Call it Bob - Microbiologists #6

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 окт 2024

Комментарии • 51

  • @myrrdyn
    @myrrdyn 6 лет назад +30

    Welcome back, videos from nottinghamscience!

  • @medcologytutorials2636
    @medcologytutorials2636 6 лет назад +1

    Please make a separate channel for biomedical subjects as they are very interesting and easily relateable.😇😊🔬🔬

  • @NeonsStyleHD
    @NeonsStyleHD 6 лет назад

    It is amazing. The potential for this technology is limitless. This technology has so many applications from removing pollution, to providing complex materials to a base on another planet. Awesome work, well done, your parents must be very proud of you both.

  • @projectmalus
    @projectmalus 6 лет назад +1

    Thanks, would love to see more on microbiology.

  • @dexterrity
    @dexterrity 6 лет назад

    Hell yeah, it's so great seeing this passion for science. These are my kind of people!

  • @Diplomkeks
    @Diplomkeks 6 лет назад +3

    Please do more Microbiology! Maybe on an seperate channel?

    • @1998wiwi
      @1998wiwi 6 лет назад +1

      As a biotechnologist I've always found it to be sorta disappointing there's no biology related channel

  • @Mrmayhembsc
    @Mrmayhembsc 6 лет назад +4

    Is there any documentation showing their research? LOve to have look at the chemical reactions/ pathway.

    • @1998wiwi
      @1998wiwi 6 лет назад

      You publish the results once you're done with your experiment, dummy

  • @MrRayne911
    @MrRayne911 6 лет назад +9

    They are such dorks... I love them.
    And is she the voice of C.V.R.I.E.?

    • @Simbosan
      @Simbosan 6 лет назад

      No, it's Latka and Simka

  • @RMoribayashi
    @RMoribayashi 6 лет назад

    When they mentioned creating an organism that ate CO2 it reminded me of Isaac Asimov's book Foundation and Earth. The protagonists visited one of the first planets terraformed by humans, Abandoned as long as 10,000 years before, the only life they encounter is a moss-like material hypersensitive to CO2. An unassuming green fuzz barely noticeable in the shady areas where it accumulated came very close to killing them.

  • @PinkChucky15
    @PinkChucky15 6 лет назад

    Very interesting!

  • @jessicadayla
    @jessicadayla 6 лет назад

    Awesome! I'm getting into similar kinds of research myself (ok, completely different, genetic disease research, but still)

  • @theblackbaron4119
    @theblackbaron4119 6 лет назад

    The scaling up might be the biggest issue since it might be not directly proportional. To be more specific, would that amount needed quadruple or would it only increase at certain incremental thresholds. Maybe the end result eats a lot more resources and energy than it's possible for being market competitive. I bet further testing is going to show. I'm just saying that there might be some unpleasant aspects on a bigger scale.
    For example , what if the organisms behave differently in a large mass with surplus of nutrition and the right atmosphere.

  • @marek-marcosvetevool1045
    @marek-marcosvetevool1045 6 лет назад +16

    so they wear protective glasses while interview but not when working

    • @Leophred
      @Leophred 6 лет назад +5

      I can be wrong, but it think it is lab policy to wear eye protection at all time when you are in the lab.

    • @bonez565
      @bonez565 6 лет назад +2

      Normal glasses can be sufficient for lab work in some cases.

    • @1998wiwi
      @1998wiwi 6 лет назад +3

      Whether you even need glasses depends on what you work with. As a microbiologist you don't need to wear them all that much.

    • @DrRuthC
      @DrRuthC 4 года назад +1

      It depends on the lab you are in. In some labs they are compulsory, in others they are not.

  • @Timbyte
    @Timbyte 6 лет назад

    wow. more pls.

  • @thanasisbethanis
    @thanasisbethanis 6 лет назад

    These two probably the two most opposite accents in the world! Haha

  • @AlexCFaulkner
    @AlexCFaulkner 6 лет назад +1

    I watch the whole video and still have no idea what they're talking about...

  • @seanski44
    @seanski44 6 лет назад

    nice vid :)

  • @bepowerification
    @bepowerification 6 лет назад +9

    just imagine what would be possible in 100 years if all the nations in the world would unite, live in peace and spend all their money on research.. sadly the only thing that could make us do it is an extraterrestrial threat to all humans.

  • @forknowledge6959
    @forknowledge6959 6 лет назад

    Looks like the beginning of Resident Evil (movies/video game)

  • @vlogerhood
    @vlogerhood 6 лет назад

    Brady, are those students in Nottingham as a function of the UK's inclusion in the Euro-zone? Is there research funded by the EU? Will their research now be in danger because of Brexit?

  • @1998wiwi
    @1998wiwi 6 лет назад +1

    Oh come on, make some sort of biology related channel already.

  • @PetraKann
    @PetraKann 6 лет назад +2

    biodegradeable plastic will eventually decay back into the environment producing CO2/Ch4

    • @fyshlearnstoskate
      @fyshlearnstoskate 6 лет назад +1

      To be recycled by the same bacteria that created it.

    • @gryyphyn8639
      @gryyphyn8639 6 лет назад

      Great idea: take away the primary growth mechanism of flora, literally the point of transpiration, and feed it to genetically engineered bacteria whose mutation cycle is not understood to produce bottles for overpriced tap water.
      Keep researching but pick something a bit more intelligent to devote your efforts to. How about engineering bacteria to destroy petroleum products in salt water and turn those in to polymers? That's a much better use of your energy.

    • @fyshlearnstoskate
      @fyshlearnstoskate 6 лет назад

      Wouldn't hurt to take a few billion tons of co2 out of the atmosphere whilst working on bacteria that can process polluted sea water. I doubt we could reduce the co2 in the atmosphere to the point of of killing off plants. The scale of production would have to be insanely huge to deplete the atmosphere and ocean of 100+years of industrial co2 production and keep up with current production levels. Or we could just trawl all the plastic thats already in ocean.

    • @fyshlearnstoskate
      @fyshlearnstoskate 6 лет назад

      Also I'm assuming you intend to keep your genetically engineered bacteria who's mutation cycle is unknown contained and not release it into the environment. Pumping and purifying mass amounts of sea water is significantly harder and more dangerous for the environment than pumping and removing c02 from the atmosphere.

  • @AndrewTSq
    @AndrewTSq 6 лет назад

    wasnt this how umbrella corp started?

  • @samueldevulder
    @samueldevulder 6 лет назад

    French accent detected!

  • @kallansi4804
    @kallansi4804 6 лет назад +5

    she's beautiful

  • @lindsaykennard6620
    @lindsaykennard6620 6 лет назад +1

    Sad to hear a scientist refer to CO2 as a pollutant and detracts from the video and no thought appears to be given to the necessity of CO2 to plant life and as Climate does change occur as it inevitably will the benefits to agriculture as the level rises with greater crop yields and less reliance on irrigation.

    • @H0A0B123
      @H0A0B123 6 лет назад +1

      Ex Animus, I don't think plants would be affected that much if CO2 increased more. They'll probably thrive. Earth has been in a greenhouse state for billions of years in the past.

    • @H0A0B123
      @H0A0B123 6 лет назад +1

      I'm talking about "(which they have) exceed the biosphere's capability". Just saying that the biosphere can easily take more CO2

    • @H0A0B123
      @H0A0B123 6 лет назад +1

      When some animals go instinct we don't say that the biosphere is dying. It's called natural selection.

    • @H0A0B123
      @H0A0B123 6 лет назад +1

      probably auto correct or something. anyway, what's your issue? I'm just stating history. nothing new.

    • @MrRayne911
      @MrRayne911 6 лет назад +1

      if there is a toxic amount of co2 to humans in the air the plants will grow better by a maximum of around 20 percent. no human life but 20 percent bigger plants. noice

  • @charlesdorval394
    @charlesdorval394 6 лет назад

    Very interesting!