The Fire-Breathing Parasaurolophus Theory
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 сен 2024
- Over the years, people have suggested several ideas and theories for the purpose of the Parasaurolophus’s crest. Some of them are plausible theories, but others are just downright weird, with the weirdest one going to the fire-breathing Parasaurolophus theory.
---------------------------------------
Want more content like this? Check out my previous video exploring the Genndy Tartakovsky’s Primal Iceberg that me and my friend made!
• The Genndy Tartakovsky...
Or check out the first episode of my new series, Random Finds in Paleo Media, where I cover smaller-scaled, obscure dinosaur media!
• Random Finds in Paleo ...
---------------------------------------
Thank you to my friend Pish, for making the drawings in the beginning of the video! Check out his channel here!
/ @superpish9527
Also, Pish and I have a discord server together. Check it out here!
/ discord
---------------------------------------
- CREDITS -
Articles
Duane Gish Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.o...
TetZoo Article on Philip J. Senter’s Book
tetzoo.com/blo...
Christian Ryan Blog
animaladventure...
Paleontology World “Fire-Breathing Dinosaur”
www.paleontolo...
Videos & Clips Used
Phil Donahue and Duane Gish Debate
• DEBATE: Phil Donahue, ...
“Evolution Challenge of the Fossil Record” Lecture by Duane Gish
• Evolution Challenge of...
Bombardier Beetle Footage
• Bombardier Beetle Spra...
Forest Background Footage
• 🎼🎥 Forest Nature Green...
Forest Stream Background Footage
• 🌿 Forest Stream Woods ...
Fire Background Video
• Fire background withou...
Music
“Instrumental Underground Rap Hip Hop Beat” by DEZK BEATS
• INSTRUMENTAL UNDERGROU...
---------------------------------------
#DinosaurTheories
#DinoDiego
Quick correction/clarification:
Philip J. Senter used the term “apnotheriopia” (which means “dead beast vision”) to simply DESCRIBE the tendency of creationist authors using the monsters to interpret prehistoric creatures. The word “apnotheriopia” does NOT DEFINE this, as I said in the video, but is used to describe it. Sorry about that.
Also, Pish is the one that made all of the drawings in the beginning of the video, and with a trackpad no less. Anyways, check him out here!
ruclips.net/channel/UCnEMLGqSVty9vf8JEctgb2A
Also, come join our discord server!
discord.gg/PwM4sCKBFJ
Anyways, thanks for reading and have a nice day!
Great video I'm a Christian creationist who read this book as a kid I do appreciate you actually considering the book to some extent and not just making a mockery of it. just wanted to point out a few things. Firstly, from a creationist point of view, two animals having a similar defence mechanism makes sense as we believe that God created everything and as such certain creatures would logically be similar. Secondly, while you may view a creationist worldview as silly we view an evolutionary one the same way for example for evolution to be true flight would have had to evolve four separate times (insects, birds, bats, and pterosaurs) and Thirdly, (this one is slightly irrelevant) a lot of us believe that Dragon is nearly an old term for dinosaur and stories of them are exaggerated accounts of man interacting with dinosaurs. that's all. Keep in mind I am not a scientist or (as you may be able to tell from my profile picture) an adult. I am not trying to argue I am stating my perspective
I can't force you to believe what I believe any more than you could force me to believe what you believe and trying would likely just irritate you I can't force Christianity down your throat and part of the reason we have a poor reputation is that some of us try (which actually goes against the Bible which states that we are to speak the truth in love) Well that's all. Again great video.
@@obsidiandragon1385 This definitely puts things in a better perspective. I respect you beliefs and I'm always glad to hear other people's perspective and opinions on things, even if I don't always believe it. Glad you enjoyed the vid👍
@@DinoDiego16 Thank you
We share the same name
Now is it a theory, or a hypothesis? Because on is being thought by a few as a possibility. The other is widely accepted as the leading idea. So if it isn't widley accepted it would be a hypothesis
a herd of fire-breathing Parasaurolophus would make for an interesting and random encounter in D&D
Wild-shaping druids would have a field day with that if you'd still count them as a Beast type.
Do it.
*takes notes*
Go on...
Thanks I'm stealing this for my campaign
It would, at that.
Still more logical then my hypothesis on the reason that T-rex and other therapods that were slowly losing their arms was due to the gradual evolution of telekinesis to hold their prey still enough to deliver a killing blow. T-Rex don't need to outrun you, or grab you, you were dead the moment it locked eyes with you.
You need to publish now before someone reads this and steals your work.
I'd believe that.
than*
That’s a thing?
Small addendum: Pa-illogicalogists have linked the Telekinetic-Theropod Theory to the Clairvoyant-Calender Theory, where it's believed that the colouration of ceratopsian frills displayed a circular calendar of the future, and later species evolved bigger frills because they would be able to look further into the future (ancient Meso-American cultures would of course base their circular stone calendars on the prehistoric calendars depicted on the frills).
Consequently, theropods obtained telekinesis because the ceratopsians displayed the end of all non-avian dinosaurs at the hand of a meteorite, and telekinesis was the only thing that could possibly halted its impact.
Alas... the adaptation came too late, when the Cretaceous reached its end, Tyrannosaurus' telekinetic powers were too underdeveloped, and the frill of Triceratops still predicted doom for the dinosaurs. Now, their valiant attempt at saving the reign of the dinosaurs is remembered only by the ones who dare... to theorize.
Fire breathing dinosaurs is something i like to believe is something we all may have glossed over before. I used to draw fire breathing dinosaurs as a kid and seeing this made me glad i wasn't the only one who thought so lol
The concept itself is truly interesting
Ever seen Dinosaur King?
The only fire breathing dinosaurs out there live in Japan
Or are in a Japanese video game
@@DinoGoofHybridHero7531 that was my show growing up
@@SuperKingGhidorah same
"The creationst scientist in question here is known by the name of Duane Gish and just from doing a little bit of research on the guy it didn't take me too long to realize that he himself is also a firebreathing parasaurolophus"
I swear by holy creationism that's what I thought Diego was going to say.
You never know. Maybe Gish is a reptilian👀
Dear Lord another person with good comedy this comment section is full of the stuff
I believe that Gish and people like him are afraid of their beliefs being wrong and God sending them to Hell for it.
@@DinoDiego16 A very talented reptilian.
@@DinoDiego16 hang on, I'll call David Icke...
“If an image like this pops up in my feed on any platform, I will drop everything I’m doing just to look more into it...”
WHY DO YOU THINK I CLICKED?
everybody gangsta til the Parasaurolophus covers you in oil and starts breathing fire
Doin your mom
or shooting water
O-O
@@spudato961 and fly
At least its ability won't work when it rains
Because you could simply fly away, of course.
0:29 Can we just talk about how MAGNIFICENT is that Para drawing.
It really is. I love it! 😂
Lol obvious reference to Kenshiro from the Fist of the North Star franchise. Nice though.
F a t
Is this a JOJO reference?
B L U R S E D I M A G E !
A fire-breathing Parasaurolophus would make for a pretty cool Rock/Fire-type fossil Pokémon, in my opinion.
Flaminsaurophus... nope
Phosphrolophus
It's like a wingless Charizard
Parasauraflame is the best i can do. It’s kinda flows. Parasauraflame I choose you!!! Gunna name a charizard this now…
Pyrolophus
Hello! I am the artist who drew the cover image for "Fire Breathing Dinosaurs? The Hilarious History of Pseudoscience At Its Silliest" by Phil Senter! Thank you for including his book, and my art, in your video!
I was inspired by many modern bird species that have red eyes (the Red-eyed Vireo, Asian Glossy Starling, Black-shouldered kite, to name a few). I also wanted to give the Parasaurolophus a somewhat menacing look. Considering all the stoner comments, I probably didn't succeed. Nonetheless, thank you for featuring my art and Senter's book! If you have questions about the book let me know. I know it isn't widely available due to its high cost at the moment...
And nobody cared lmfaooo
Cool stuff I hope you've developed your technique would love to see more fire breathing dinosaurs.
10:07 The combination of it's red eyes and the smoke makes it look like a stoner.
my thoughts exactly haha
That’s where the para comes from 😂
I totally love the fire breathing parasaurolophus theory, but humbly suggest that it is incorrect in one particular: specifically that rather than breathing fire the creature spewed forth incredibly foul language so obscene that the targeted predators were forced to retreat in spasms of pearl clutching offended horror, their delicate theropod sensibilities shocked to the core.
Clearly this is a far more logical theory thus you gain my upvote
Yeah maybe they weren't breathing fire, they were spiting fire
So they get roasted in a different way
This theory has all the logic required to get me on board extremely good work dear fellow
Had no idea that predatory dinosaurs were liberals
Parasauralophus was always my favorite when I was a kid, and now that I see her breathe fire, she's the most beautiful thing I've ever seen.
She? Bruh, you surely love this hadrosaur don't ya?
Beautiful creatures
@@alvaronavarro4895 since clearly no one has caught on yet it was a jurassic park reference, from when Alan Grant was speaking to Ellie about the sick triceratops.
@@observingeye9579 Oooh bruh I'm sorry for not getting the reference
@@observingeye9579 why are you covering for the freak with a lie
It's like he found a kids drawing and went "of course!"
A fire breathing para would be incredible in ARK
YES
So so true 😂🥲
And it could work as a mobile campfire and cook meat or cooking pot and you can make brews and stuff
Also got the 40th like (I think)
If you download the mod primal fear one of the dinos is a fire breathing parasaur
That's it. Some of the dinosaurs that feature in my fantasy universe will now breathe fire. This is canon because it sounds cool af.
Not just cool, but scientifically plausible too.
Dinobot style
Nice m8 a developing fantasy universe based on made up stuff and random stuff somehow made sound scientific by some guy with a small amount of actually knowledge in true sciences and mainly focusing on the Bible's information nice (just a crud joke sorry if it was harsh)
@@kerukutheweirdo1003
I also use a lot of lesser known extinct animals as fauna. Like, I could just have normal animals, but why do that when I could use any number of extinct crocodylomorphs?
Tell me more!
Shout out to that time Animal Planet made a multi day documentary about the fossil record of dragons without saying a word about it not actually being true.
Yeah saw that many years ago and it made me mad lol
I enjoyed it but I saw it where it was clearly signposted as a pseudodocumentary. Was during a spate of them from the admirable Smallpox 2002 to the utter disaster that was Mermaids- The Body Found. Now that was some mess.
I know, right?! I saw that damn thing a sh*t long time ago. lol
That pissed me off when at the very end they let on that the whole thing was made up. 10 year old me felt like I’d just wasted an hour and a half of my time.
Oh do you mean Dragons: A fantasy made real? The anatomy of those dragons was terrible anyway. Obviously dragons aren't actually real, but if you present yourself as a documentary about what dragons would be like if they WERE real, that kind of stuff actually matters.
To be honest, a fire breathing hadrosaur sounds like an awesome fantasy creature.
Its an awesome real life creature too.
@@trevorh6438 yeah, aside from the fire breathing
Isn’t that basically a dragon?
@@mightymsdragon2498 pretty much
sure give your herb a weapon that can destroy its food sources in hours . at least it consider a swimmer so while it could breath fire it was in the wetlands
We’re witnessing the rise of a RUclips star
Yep
Yup
Who gives a flying fuck!
@@algireaux1364 me lol
@@SirPizzaPasta not me
The best part about this hypothesis is that it proposes that an animal must have been able to breathe fire by comparing it to another animal that most definitely does not breathe fire.
"That just sounds like a dragon with extra steps"
The word dinosaur didn't come about until their discovery in the late 1800's. Before that, the only term was dragon. So who knows, perhaps dinosaurs and dragons are one and the same.
I always felt the Parasaurolophus was my favorite dinosaur, so I would KILL to see it actually breathe fire, even if that makes no sense whatsoever lmao.
It makes perfect sense, there is no proof that could suggest the impossibility, except accepting it as so publicly would embarrass a good number of elite and influential scientists and upend their carefully crafted narrative.
@@trevorh6438 I really wanna know what benefit that crafting a lie/narrative about the capabilities of random dinosaurs would give to scientists and society as a whole.
@@ramenbomberdeluxe4958 not "crafting a lie" just perpetuating established dogma that has since been disproven. And the reason is: fame, respect, and grant money.
If, supposing, all of a sudden everything we knew was shown to be false, the cognitive dissonance would be devastating to many who staked their whole lives on certain claims.
Remember when we all used to think dinos were scalely lizards, and then all of a sudden they were feathered bird relatives? It took years for the public to really accept it, and dinosaur toy manufacturers are STILL making scientifically inaccurate scalely lizard toys and passing them off as dinosaurs (see, "Your dinosaurs are wrong" playlist) Jurrassic Park Four still thinks velociraptors are humansized.. Think of things like that, and then consider that besides a consumer product that may or may not sell, high reputations of prestigious scientists who backed one theory over another might also be on the line.
@@trevorh6438 Shut up trevor
@@prixe12 You hate me because I speak the truth. And You cannot control me.
I love how displeased the rex in the thumbnail looks
The "chemical defense" of the bombardier beetle has also inspired other works of speculative wildlife such as the Spitfire Bird from the Future is Wild & Dragons from Dragons: A Fantasy Made Real
Animals that use chemical defenses like bombardier beetles and skunks usually have the defense organs in the rear so they can shoot at predators when fleeing from then.
Therefore, a fire-farting dinosaur would make more sense.
“Dude hand me a lighter”
Dinosaurs don’t fart. Well, their modern day relatives don’t fart, anyway.
Holy shit, so that's where "gish gallop" comes from! Funny how I came here to learn about some fire breathing dinosaur.
I love how this video felt very unbiased, positive, understanding and open minded. A lot of them time people allowed or even encouraged to be cruel and mean-spirited in topics like these and the civility of your discussion is refreshing
I agree with 100%!! Thanks for pointing that out! ^^
Dino Diego is probably the most chill Dinotuber out there.
0:31 vegetarian breath is invincible
Dragons: *"LOOK WHAT THEY NEED TO IMITATE A FRACTION OF OUR POWER!"*
Just saying, in earth's long history of extinct animals. Some creature probably did a more spectacular version of what one specific beetle living today does.
Good point
Yea. Judging by the fact that most tissue are not fossilised on fossils we already have makes it all the more plausible that we missed a fire-breathing dinosaur
@@sparraw5603 Hell, for all we know, Theres dragon fossils hidden deep in the earth
Name checks out
@@donutlovingwerewolf8837 For all we know more dinosaurs than they admit were improperly reconstructed and some ARE dragons
Dino Diego: pronounces worlds like parasaurolophus and sarocosuchuses right every time
Also Dino Diego: Apnotheriopia is too hard, im not even gonna try
Leviathan: big, scaly, has sharp teeth
Sarcosuchus: big, scaly, has sharp teeth.
Damn bro, what a very specific set of similarities, they're clearly the same animal, there's no way that's just a coincidence, they're the only 2 creatures in Earth's history to possess those 3 exact traits.
/s in case it wasn't obvious.
Also, the part that is semi-aquatic XD
why this comment lookin like “damn bro you got the whole squad laughing/s” it hurts
tone indicators are wasted potential
Isn't there more to the description of the leviathan than that.
@@garrickberry3175 In fact IIRC it's described as having "great fins" and specifically not being related to either snakes or crocodiles.
@@JohnRaines Hmm, so the closest animal to a Leviathan would be Kronosaurus/Pliosaurus, large, reptilian, huge fins and not related to snakes and crocodiles.
This is Godzilla’s long lost cousin
XD XD XD
this needs more likes
He was rejected for a reason, maybe lost demons are meant to stay lost
I mean we do have electric eels, bombardier beetles (who throw chemicals), and fish who shoot water jets, as well as animals that hunt with echolocation. While I don't believe any animal did ever use fire as a weapon, it would be interesting to explore how it would in theory be possible.
I bet sharks do it
Humans used fire to hunt
@@heddalee how would that work
@@Rexred09 their fins act as waterwheels underwater, and they use them to generate surplus electricity.
@@heddalee That is completly ridiculous.
Dinosaur: *Exists*
Indian cartoons: *"I diagnose you with breath fire."*
This hypothesis makes perfect sense. Why wouldn't a herbivore have the ability to severely damage it's environment and eliminate it's own food sources?
Because cooked food tastes better, he was just on the cutting edge of evolution
@@hentaimage95 lol
Crazy theory however it gives godzilla some credibility.
Not gonna lie; this was a pretty metal concept. Glad I stumbled upon this video.
Seeing this tumbnail unlocked a long forgotten memory of mine, when i was fascinated by dinosaurs as a kid.
My dad who is a christian used to read me stories from the bible and once told me how there is a fire breathing monster described in the bible. He also said how its speculated that that could be the parasaurolophus and for a long time i believed that. I was very young and didn't have much of an opinion of my own lol.
I had totally forgotten that this theory even existed, thank you for this video, you have my subscription
As a Christian, I really appreciate your kindness and gentleness to Christians who are rather ignorant on this science, and it is obvious you are going out of your way to be polite. That takes genuine character and true kindness. I believe God is real, but a lot, if not most, of the creationist science is ridiculous.
But I understand Christians who are rejecting it. It’s not easy to understand science while also believing in God, even though Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday and the discoverers of the human genome certainly all did. But we all have confirmation bias, and unfortunately the church tries to convince that everyone think absolutely as they do which is absolutely anti-science.
But I do believe there is a God and science shows how amazing his creation is how much we all truly do have purpose. God loves each and every one of us and we should show that same love and compassion to others.
If you, as a Christian, study the bible back to front and take everything you read as real physical events that only physical beings were involved in. You would, in fact, be able to find vast amounts of scientific data that proves all historical events in the bible to be true.
If you, as a Christian, study Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology; I promise you, that you will find all the evidence you need to prove the existence of an omniscient entity as the origins of existence in the universe.
I agree, I think that science is our way of understanding how God's creation works. I certainly don't think people should reject science, but realize how it actually supports God's word.
I don't mean any disrespect to you or your religion, but I am curious on your thinking. I personally have neve read the Bible, so I may be ignorant about its contents, but to my knowledge there are many instances in the Bible that directly conflict with scientific evidence. As someone who believes in the Bible and science, how do rectify these contradictions? Again, I don't mean any disrespect, nor do I want to come across as bashing your religion, but I am genuinely very curious.
@@swanqlord3048 I personally don't think that science necessarily contradicts the Bible, but every Christian interprets scripture differently to some degree, so I think the best idea would be to study the Bible yourself and make your own conclusions. As a disclaimer, I am no expert on the Bible nor am I a scientist, but I think I have adequate understanding of both to make my conclusions. As a side note, some of the greatest scientists in the world are devout Christians, so, maybe that speaks for itself. Thanks to everyone out there keeping discussions respectful, God bless!
@@swanqlord3048 where are the contradictions? The Bible clearly describes first contact with an alien specices
I owned this book as a child. I do remember the fire breathing picture vividly as well as the Cowboy one, I also thought it was so cool to see humans and dinosaurs together.
I was obsessed with dinosaurs as a child, but my fundamentalist parents only provided me with creationist material.
It’s only been in the last 10 years my interest has be renewed to continue my learning, but now without the religious propaganda.
I love pigger nussy ❣️
7:01 is Thag Simmons getting ready to learn what a Thagomizer actually does.
oh gosh, that poor Bombardier beetle has been co-oped so many times by creationists. Its hilarious
Well it is a pretty amazing creature. The little outlets where the chemicals mix fluctuate at incredible speeds to only let out small amount of the liquids at a time because if they just stayed open the beetle would literally explode itself.
This is one thing in the bible I really wish was true. I can just imagine a quetzalcoatlus flying by and roasting some herbivore herd like smaug from lotr. I do wonder if this idea has made its way to literature and fiction
Yeah that would be fucking sick
I would watch a animated or live action movie (if done right) take in a biblical glance. Sure it’ll be inaccurate and might cause a slight stur, but dang! It’ll be a interesting unique take on a dinosaur settings!
I had this book when I was a kid! I think my mom bought it for me because she wanted my newly developing interest in dinosaurs to not upset the carefully crafted christian viewpoint she had built in me at the time. I liked a lot of the illustrations, but even as a child, the parasaurolophus breathing fire thing always had me skeptical.
Imagine the dino actually used to spit fire. This dude was ahead of his time.
Now, I am a believer of objectivity, that of which Paleontology persists on following if or until a theory is rewritten or proven wrong. Gish had something going there with his theory--maybe Hadrosaurs like _Parasaurolophus_ could concentrate some kind of projectile from their mouth. It's not something we haven't seen with the Camel and Alpaca before--including some lizards and birds. If these animals use regurgitation and spitting as a defense mechanism why condemn Duane Gish's theory for its reputation? It's paleontologists like Philip J. Senter that should be teaching the next generation of scientists to appreciate such speculations & theories, therein forming our own decisions and research not destroying another's credibility. That's is what Paleontology is at the end of the day: Art formed around facts & logic.
Spitting Cobras spit like the name says. It's a poison that blinds, from a fair distance too. Dinosaurs are a fertile field for speculations as they are so far in the past and only left fossils and a few impressions in rock. Maybe one of 'em could spit acid from its stomach. Who knows? Anythings possible.
@@jamesmacleod9382 That is why we use their modern descendants or animals occupying those niches as reference. Several birds and reptiles utilize their excrements as a special defense. However, these studies come minor considering Paleontologists depend on research we do know instead of what we don't.
Wow, blast from the past, I definitely had this book as a kid, it was one of many that sparked a love of dinosaurs. Still do love dinosaurs, and still a Christian, but not a young earth creationist type, in spite of how awesome fire-breathing dinosaurs sound. It's a combination of weird, funny, and frustrating seeing how they try to twist evidence to fit a hyper "literal" interpretation of the Bible, and they still have to bring in a bunch of random stuff that's not even in the Bible to make it work (i.e. calculating the age of the earth at 6,000 years or whatever).
The Bible isn't a science textbook, and isn't trying to be one. If you read the writings of the early church fathers its clear that many of them already understood the Genesis creation account symbolically/poetically. Frankly, to me it is much more in keeping with my understanding of God that he would create a universe of mind-boggling complexity, where life can develop, adapt and "be fruitful and multiply across the earth" as Genesis puts it, rather than plonking down everything fully formed in one "literal" week and hoping nothing changes or the whole thing breaks down.
Sorry to ramble, thanks for taking a look at the book, it was fun to see again.
The Bible may not be scientific, but Pliny the Elder's Naturalis Historia is.
Amen, brother.
Fair point. But considering the holes in the Theory of Evolution both that and religion require an equal amount of faith to commit to. Plus evolutionists have had equally wacky hypotheseses over the years so I fail to see why creationists are seen as the crazy ones.
you have a very interesting perspective!
@@zanyraccoon6361 because evolution is backed by evidence and science whereas creationism is backed by a fantasy book. creationism literally requires magic for their "theories" to make sense. also what "holes" in the theory of evolution? that comment in combination with your use of the term evolutionists which only creationists use makes me think you're just a creationist type who never bothered to learn anything about evolution
Friendly reminder that the combustion is not "spontaneous" if it only happens in the presence of oxygen and chemicals. Otherwise great video!
Doesn't it just refer to a fire starting with no external heat source?
Gish is pretty infamous within theological circles as being a great example of what not to do. Also just so everyone knows the dragon verse wasn’t literal lol and was just a fanciful way to describe something. (Because job is likely not literal but that still debated)
I had this book growing up!! It was one of my favorites because it had so much info in it and the little maps of where the dinosaurs were from.
Not gonna lie, I understood that the fire breathing thing in was just a neat idea in the book, but I later went to a creationist conference where the guy fully claimed that they had found a fossil of a fire breathing dinosaur. I was pretty disappointed when I got older and found there was no such discovery.
RIP fire breathing dinosaurs, you would have been so cool!
I got a dinosaur creationism book as a gift once. It was a A-Z book and all it tried to do was convince kids that evolution is wrong instead of opening their minds to new possibilities. Like saying coelophysis bones are everywhere in the world cause of the flood and instead of having an actual dinosaur on L, he put Leviathan...
Tbf evolutionist books do that too
@@jarofdirt8359 most books directed towards kids don't call out the bible or attack God. They simply teach the science and theories behind dinosaurs
Remember Parasaurolophus appearing as a toy in Godzilla 2014, now looks like too much coincidence
In a fictional setting I'd love the idea of dinosaurs being a type of dragon, allowing it to share the same fire breathing capabilities typically associated with the traditional winged dragons. I'm sure Monster Hunter has done something akin to this.
I always loved that book. While I never believed Parasaurolophus could breathe fire, even as a small child, and thought it always made more sense for the crest to be related to acoustics, it's obviously a very cool idea and that image is pretty awesome. Most of the rest of that book is pretty great, though, particularly the dinosaur pictures. I just like dinosaur pictures.
I had this very book as a kid, and I found it fascinating. Though my ideas on history have changed over the years, it was one of the first books on Dinosaurs I read and it inspired my fascination with paleontology. Regardless of the accuracy or contents, I'm still quite fond of the book as it's really what brought me here today. Honestly I was incredibly shocked when I saw a page from it as the thumbnail and the memories flooded back. Fantastic Video and a really fair look at the topic.
I wouldn't discount the fire breathing on the account of it being harmful to the user, nature has a way of not caring how harmful it is as long as it promotes survival. From lizards spraying their own blood and having easily detached limbs, to certain sea creatures voiding their bowels to escape, it doesn't matter how self harming it is as long as it helps them survive.
I think it's unlikely any dinosaurs we know of would breathe some sort of fire, but I'm sure there could be one out there somewhere, after all we have barely scratched the surface on extinct species.
Thank you for speaking out about that.
non of those examples are particularly debilitating to the user, assuming they don't get eaten they can still eat and move just about as well as they could before. Getting bad mouth burns would mean the animal wouldn't be able to eat properly if at all.
What about goth possums that cut themselves knowing that you will find them so sad and pathetic that you will leave them alone? I know it's true because a creationists scientist told me about it!
@@etinarcadiaego7424 lol hell yea, goth animals are the true creatures of the earth.
What do you think about this: herbivore digestion creates lots of flamable methane (natural gas). Herbivore dinosaurs also had large smooth quartzite stone in some kind of gullet. Stones, which if struck together would spark. And light any flammable gas in the area. I really don't know, but the idea crossed my mind yesterday.
Do a video about David Peter's crazy reconstructions.
+1
+1
+5
+69
+420
Big animal = dragon
Creationist moment
why do people love the idea of dragons, weird
Because humans from hundreds of years ago found fossils of dinosaurs from millions of years ago and didn't understand where they came from so they chalked it up to dragons. Chinese emperors had fossils ground up and stirred into a tea because they thought it would give them the powers of a dragon. Kings sent out knights to kill dragons because they found dinosaur tooth fossils, then blamed dragons on dead livestock instead of making fences bigger so lions couldn't sneak in for a quick meal. Dragons are a universal concept because dinosaurs were all over the world.
I mean… creationists are nutjobs, but dragons were a universal theory around the entire world.
@@arandomuser8364 Nutjobs? Explain, please.
@@savageboosterstudios pseudo-science lunatics basically. But before I get burned at the stake, I want to clarify that christians and creationists are two different kind of people. (just in case, I don’t wanna be misinterpreted and called an “anti-christian bigot” again)
I could just imagine Jurassic Park becoming a reality and all the scientists being awestruck when the Paras actually do start breathing fire on everything.
While I'm not religious myself, I appreciate how kind you have been about religious ideologies and their historical inaccuracies.
Fire-breathing Parasaurolophus seems like something that would combine with group of other dinosaurs to form a giant robot
Since I don’t think anyone has mentioned it, the verse in the book is from Job 41, which is talking about the Leviathan. To TLDR it, it’s a sea serpent that’s more or less God’s most powerful creature, at least on earth. It was irresponsible of him to use it for this argument about a obviously unrelated animal, as the Leviathan is specifically mentioned as a sea creature.
Why didn't my bible have these creatures in it, it just had boring humans
@@raptorjesus2516 just need to know where to look
I remember having that book as a kid, amongst many other books like it. I thought it was super cool, and i loved the pictures. However growing up under creationism and intense religion really left me out of learning actual science and how the world worked. Im 22 now and still trying to re-educate myself
Good luck.
Yeah, actual science. “The culture war doesn’t exist but it hurts people. White doesn’t exist, but white privilege does. Gender doesn’t exist but misgendering me is violence. CRT doesn’t exist, but don’t you dare remove it from our curriculum. Cancel culture doesn’t exist, and if you don’t shut up you’re canceled.” University Leftism is a religion, good luck learning that bunk
@@Tempusverum That is an extremely bad faith way to describe the humanities and social studies. You should try actually understanding these fields instead of taking fear-mongering propaganda at face value
LOVE that thumbnail:
“Ugh! No! It feels really bad! I don’t like it!”
i loved this book as a younger kid. the cowboys and the pterasaurs is so beautiful, this left me obsessed with sci fi and outlandish creatures living at our side. so it was a small step to Dune etc.
I have indeed wondered how seemingly defenseless dinosaurs, well, defended their selves. I mean, what would keep carnivorous dinosaurs from just walking up and chomping them?
I know I'm not getting anything from replying to a (at the time of writing) 6 month old comment, but hadrosaurs are more ungodly big than we give them credit for. Also, the slap of a hadro's tail, while not as deadly as thyreophorans, would still have a chance of plugging a carnivore's life support and make it meet God early
@@goji5052 Yeah, I reckon. Or maybe they could run a bit faster or something. There obviously had to be some way they had of surviving a meat eater attack, or there wouldn't have been so many of 'em.
hadrosaurs like para could kick HARD
You know, this video reminded me of a quote from Jack Horner, Comparing science and religion isn't like comparing apples and oranges - it's more like apples and sewing machines.
I can't exactly say I agree with this, in fact, I'd argue that comparing religion to science is like comparing a green apple to a red one. They both fundamentally are the same in terms of providing answers for the origin of our existence. I don't agree with the thought process that science should completely surpass religion nor vice versa.
Whilst an argument could be said that most creationist theories are rather baffling, to say the least, people act as if there haven't been any such theories in the scientific field either, or should I remind everyone that we once believed this diverse group of prehistoric animals to all be nothing more than giant Iguanas? No theory can be ruled out unless there is a 100% possibility that it can not be fact. I urge everyone to keep an open mind and don't close the doors to such possibilities. That being said, a fire breathing Dinosaur is a bit out of the realm of belief in my opinion.
Also that evolution used to be effected 100% by the environment ie cut off rat tails enough and the rat's tails will shrink till they have no tail.
@@Dawleyllama That's micro-evolution, also, where'd you get this information?
@@savageboosterstudios No, I am not talking about micro-evolution. I am talking about inheriting traits that were passed down due to physical alterations during it's lifespan. As to where I heard it Highschool and Charles Darwin. Darwin talked about giraffes and that their long necks were due to stretching and my science teacher explained it as if cutting off tails from rats. ie NOT via mutation. (yes, I know this is not accurate, this is in response to dinosaurs being giant lizards)
@@Dawleyllama Oh so it's hypothesizing, not actual fact. The way you said it made it seem like you were stating it as fact.
@@savageboosterstudios I wouldn't even consider it hypothesizing. Just straight up wrong.
As soon as I saw the thumbnail, somehow, I knew creationists were involved.
No idea why but this made me remember fossil fighters. I loved that game.
The issue isn’t that the creation models of dinosaurs open up crazy new possibilities, the issue is how many people take creation models seriously due to almost total lack of evidence.
It sounds more like he made a Pokemon rather then a "real" dino
…… I like where this is going.
@@RogueT-Rex8468 same
As a creationist myself, please do not let Gish represent all of us. Thank you for not completely making fun of him or our beleifs, like most other people in this field. The Bible has countless metaphors and poetry-like literature, so it could have been talking about something else entirely, or maybe that verse was taken out of context. Again, thank you for being respectful and kind when discussing this and please don't let Gish represent everyone😀✝️
Who cares what the unsaved world thinks and if they are respectful to the truth. Don't be like this. This is effeminate. Christ said the world will hate us. Eventually it will chop off the heads of the true believers for refusing the mark of the beast. Truth is not compatible with this world. The bible says Satan is the god of this world. Hence why we are commanded to not be of the world. The world isn't our friend, we are not commanded to respect it nor does it matter if it respects us, infact the bible says whatever is highly esteemed by man is an abomination in the sight of God (Luke 16:15). It also says whosever is a friend of the world is an enemy of God (James 4:4). The mark of the beast is the c shot and whosever takes it is doomed without forgiveness. Repent of your sins and seek Christ and be closer to Him than ever before in these last days
bruh idk how people can still be creasionist in this day and age isn't there enough proof?
You all sound like fanatics when you quote your bible XD
maybe there is a god or something but if it's the case he doesn't give a shit about us get over it
@@thimb5433 you're not gonna make any progress by disrespecting people.
@@prylosecorsomething3194 yeah I am sorry if that’s rude but come on it’s not that hard 😂
To be fair, the man predicted the video game called Fossil Fighters in about twenty years before the game came to existence
To put it oversimplified, in the game there’s an island where a machine (commandeered by alien technology) revives dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals with elemental abilities (fire, water, earth, air, and neutral)
I was in high school debate for three years. The way we defined spreading was speaking as fast as possible to give as many arguments in your allotted time as possible.
I'm happy about this, Parasaurolophus just got a well deserved buff.
Omg, kaijus are real!
Para-zilla existed everyone!
Let's hope something does the same thing with evolution somehow in some place in the world and go on a rampage via semi-aquatic evolutionary traits anyway.
Thanks for a video game idea!
Lol ur welcome
Bruh, the fire breathing thing is talking about Leviathan, who is a Satan metaphor, because he is the great serpent and stuff, even his theology is wacky.
So parasaurolophus is Satan?
@@weirdshrimpnumber9755 that is one of the hottest takes of the century.
Leviathan is not satan. He's a satan-like figure but straight up predates the concept of Satan
To my knowledge, the most likely explanation for what leviathan was is a crocodile, it fits very well with how an ancient would view it. similarly, behemoth could be describing a hippo
This makes sense to me, and isn't my own idea, just adding info to the discussion :-)
Yay I'm so happy your channel is growing
Wow 6 months later you reached 27k subs! Amazing!
Even if Parasaurolophus did have something similar to bombardier beetles, it would likely just spray burning chemicals, not fire. I don't understand the jump from beetle to full on fire
An overall crazy idea,
But at least there was some attempted credibility by comparing it with the Bombadier Beetle
Yeah.
This is legit the coolest theory
Y'know I'd love this concept being homaged in something like Jurassic Park, but in a more logical sense, like a new breed of Parasaurolophus that's part bombardier beetle where, instead of breathing fire like a dragon, it spits out a liquid similar to what the beetle sprays out of its mouth with the power of a fire hose.
Would love an in depth video on the other theories about the Parasaurolophus crest.
The persistence of dragons in ancient mythology is undeniable. It would be foolish to dismiss it simply because we currently do not understand it.
the persistence of multi headed monsters in mythology is undeniable so I guess three headed dogs must be real 😂
I think my favorite part is seeing the reviews of the 5 stars in this book XD like "science minded kid" who said that? Honestly I think that kid would found it hilarious.
A very interesting video, honestly it would be great if there was a fire-breathing dinosaur XD, but I don't think they needed it since the claws and fang seem to be enough
Need has got nothing to do with it.
Some snakes are poisonous only when they ingest a certain type of animal that lives in a very specific spot while others of the very same species without that animal in its diet are nonpoisonous.
"despite being released in 1992, dinosaurs by design was actually really easy to obtain" that's because creationists don't change their ideas when new evidence comes out so this is still their most current literature.
would just like to say that we don't have to change because we haven't found evidence that actually contradicts the core of what we believe
@@obsidiandragon1385 It's impossible to find evidence for or against the supernatural since the definition of supernatural is everything outside the realm of science (science being the only means of explaining anything). No one is trying to take your beliefs about god away from you but it's pretty obvious to anyone who's willing to apply skepticism to every idea they consider, including the ideas they cherish, that the only reason to believe in the young earth concept or any other aspect of magical creationism is fear of not living forever. This is why the only people who don't believe evolution makes any sense as an explanation for our origins are people who believe in some magical afterlife and even many religious people acknowledge that evolution makes sense. The idea of finding evidence for the supernatural goes against the notion of faith since faith means believing regardless of the evidence and if the supernatural is real, it isn't bound by laws of physics and can therefor contradict any proven evidence and still be true. The fact that you try to find evidence for your beliefs proves you have no actual faith. Just because you can't muster any faith is no excuse for promoting anti-informative propaganda just to tell yourself "it's believable because lot's of people believe it" like people do with the bible its self
@@Where_is_Waldo "The fact that you try to find evidence for your beliefs proves you have no actual faith. Just because you can't muster any faith is no excuse for promoting anti-informative propaganda just to tell yourself "it's believable because lot's of people believe it" like people do with the bible its self" What? are you saying you would find me more reasonable if I believed the Christianity blindly? though I do agree with your assessment of the super natural
@@obsidiandragon1385 I wouldn't find you idea more reasonable but your reason for believing the idea would be more in line with the idea and you might stop trying to cram you unreasonable idea into reasonable curriculum
@@Where_is_Waldo oh ok so I assume you believe in eternal matter then instead of eternal God? since the big bang or whatever you believe kick-started reality must have come from somewhere right? at times it seems like what you believe takes more faith to believe in then what I believe
As a Christian who loves dinosaurs, I’ve spent a lot of time trying to figure out how dinosaurs fit into Christianity, but I really don’t know enough about either side to make a fair conclusion. I guess I’ll know when I’m dead! Haha! But as for the Leviathan, I think it is more likely just a metaphor used to teach, rather than an actual beast.
There's in a line in scripture I forgot which one but it says something like Cain hunted animals to extinction. Or something along those lines, and that would be where that fits
Look in the book of JOB n GOD describes Leviathan. And Behemoth. They are both his creations so how what he is talking about.
The Creation story is a metaphor not to be taken literary. That's the way I and many Christians see it.
@@Epsilonsama No, not really.
I think that Dinosaurs by Design book is a reprint of an older creationist book called, "Dinosaurs, Those Terrible Creatures." I had this book when I was a kid. It also had the fire breathing parasaurolophus. But the artwork was much cooler tbh.
I once wished upon the RUclips algorithm gods to recommend me good small channels more. I have been blessed over and over again.
fire breathing dinosaurs would explain the concept of dragons....
Not really? Unless you think animals that went extinct 66 million years ago somehow influenced early humans through abilities that no-one would have even known about until recent times?
@@Raptorworld22 you sure they went extinct???
@@npc1374 Considering the orgy of evidence that says so, I'm pretty sure we can say with relative certainty that animals with no proof of being alive can be counted as extinct
A fire breathing hadrosaur sounds biblical
Indeed
4:35 Maybe you should read it and find out what it is referencing. We gotta read everything for context when learning about things that people believe. Weather we believe it after or not is not important during the exploration process. The important part is that we read and observe all of the evidences and context of what we are looking at thoroughly before going further into the subject. I do believe in the theory of the horn sound being made from its head.
I also follow the theory of the crest being used to communicate intimate aggressors and predators and other utilities.
Interesting. There have been many theories on dinosaurs over the years. I remember when sauropods were thought to live in water and eat sea weed because it was thought they were too heavy to walk on land and it would be safer because T-Rex couldn't swim. I remember the Parasaurolophus air-storage theory for swimming underwater. It makes you wonder. What natural defense did hadrasaurs like Parasaurolophus against predators? Could they outrun them? The hot chemicals is not the craziest dinosaur theory I've heard over the years.
To me it looks like a goat with horns (or just one i guess). I bet they used that horn like a rhino uses his.
Okay this was some grade a fun and silliness lol. But here's an interesting Bible/dinosaur theory that actually has some weight to it. Some people compare the biblical beast Behemoth to that of a Brontosaurous because of some of the specific details used to describe it. It was said to eat vegetation, unable to be tamed by man and it had a tail which "swung like a cedar". A bronto matches that description so i thought that was neat and it is very likely that a bronto was the animal God was talking about.
I grew up being taught this stuff. In one of his other books he said that ancient Chinese civilizations used Triceratops as beasts of burden.... He had a lot of interesting theories and is responsible for a lot of the extreme creationist beliefs in conservative christian circles.
I love how someone hears about Leviathan and thinks "ancient crocodile" instead of just " nile crocodile". I mean, christ, they are just far away enough to be encountered by ancient Mesopotamians, without being familiar to them. It's like medieval Europeans and Elephants.
I imagine Fire Type Pokémon wouldn’t have that many predators
But...water type Pokémon?
I read once about fiery breath in a human :: a parson's breath sometimes caught fire when he blew the altar candles out. The cause proved to be inflammable gas coming up from a stomach ulcer. A surgical operation stopped it from happening.
I need more Dino channels in my life