I’m an ex British Army private ranked soldier who struggles to believe that these chaps can’t pronounce “nuclear” correctly! 😂😂😂😂 “newcular” it ain’t fellas 😂😂😂
Come on, man, you know "new-cular" refers to two things: the NEW things to be put in Britain... and those "new" things have "cular" attachments --- like bino-cular, mole-cular, atomi-cular, thermo-new-cular, etc....
Most people I know still think nuclear war will never happen. When I talk about prepping food and water they think I am crazy being in Canada and safe from anything. When I served we pray for peace but prepare for the worse. Denial won’t make it go away
It likely wont. With that said, prepping food and water is still a good idea in these times. When you really think about it, something like a large power or internet outage is enough for society to completely go haywire. Food, flashlights, gas heater, radios, cash, water, medicine. its a good idea to have.
Prepping is a good idea regardless. Nothing at all wrong with having sufficient food and water, skills to make more, being ready for power outages, disease and illness.
Exactly. It's just bunch of nuclear scientist pretending to be mind readers and their guess is about as good as the average Joe's. If you wanted any kind of actual expert, one should ask some psychiatrist to evalute Putin and base it on that, but even that would still not be much better than a guess.
Nor do I ,the credible force here is the continued threat of using nuclear weapons not a clock it goes tick tock a nuclear weapon goes boom in a big way.I wish we had never discovered fire whilst grunting in the caves because kids with matches not a good mix .Sorry I had to belittle the human race but we seem to be loosing our sanity.Perhaps we could blame earths ongoing polarity shift for that?
Exactly. The scientist adjusting the clock are basically guessing just like everyone else. They don't have a crystal ball and can't read the mind of people making relevant decisions.
@@minkgin3370 We were already targets, I can't remember if it was Putin or The Kremlin that said that if nuclear war did break out then they would hit London first.
Biden was asked by a member of the public last year, do you think there will be a war in Europe his reply was if there is don't worry it won't affect America
The UK has enough nuclear weapons to turn the entire russian population to 0 by its own and start a nuclear winter. What Russia and the US have is just an exaggeration that serves to deter each other, dont fall into propaganda
He is 100 percent in th pocket of the WEF,and a spoilt billionaire who has never done a days graft in his life,so he will do whatever his sick masters tell him to
@@timothychung4811 On the other hand Putin has been there 21 years and has built an empire of corruption and is now dictator for life. Yeah, whinge about PM being voted out because of your ignorance
@@user-vc5zt9ci12 perfectly understood, my question is why place any nuclear weapons on Uk soil when we already have some, the deterrent is clear, tactical nuclear weapons are just another reaction to any nuclear weapons used or threatened to be used against Uk soil, if we get to that stage nothing really matters!
@@davidkennedy8929 OK, I understand. So the difference is whether we provide support if nukes are used in Europe. I'm on the side of yes as I don't think neutrality would work in the long term... therefore we need all capabilities. Just my view - I respect yours
@roywatson8133 Sometimes, it feels like Putin is the only adult in the room. I suggest we pursue a peace agreement like was in place March 2022 that BoJo & Lloyd Austin told Zelensky not to sign. It's always a mistake listening to these neo-cons from the West.
@@denniscrork318 That so called peace agreement was fake. Not all of us are willing to bend over for Putin. If you can't see what Putin is up to then more fool you.
Are you mad? We are all under the one banner it’s called NATO is does not matter what weapons are stocked anywhere attack on 1 is attack on all either way Russia wld strike the UK as we’re closer and smaller
It is ridiculous to believe that the Russians had ambitions to take all of Ukraine, let alone any other country in eastern Europe because they came in with only 150 thousand military - a ridiculously small number- which would not even ever be enough to occupy half of Ukraine. There was no danger for the WEST beyond the need for negotiations with Russia who only demanded the promise from the Ukr to never join NATO because that would bring nuclear missiles far too close to Moscou and their silos. The NATO has been salivating for decades about making a first strike as effective as possible. There are some seriously deranged people at the top in Nato. Putin avoided a situation that would have led to a first strike by NATO, leading to enough nuclear retaliation to cause a nuclear winter on the northern hemisphere...
Slick argument from a Putin apologist. In fact, ever since the special military operation broke down Russia has repeatedly threatened the West with nuclear war.
@@Leigh-ry3yb I'm likely older and wider then you. And I agree, it's going to be anyone under 41 who will end up dragged into a war they don't want to fight in. But the reality is buddy.. If you look at what's going on around the world and you compare it to historic events we're heading towards a main conflict. You can bury your head in the sand if you like but that won't change a thing. Look. I don't want war. I don't want innocent people dieing in general. But I didn't want Ukraine to get into war with Russia. I didn't want inflation or CVD19.. All of these happened and burying my head in the sand didn't do a thing. The facts are we're heading towards a conflict and it's going to take clear heads and grown ups round a table to figuire it out. Let's look at who's leading the world right now.. They can't be trusted. And putin he's not backing down despite what western media tells us. He's increasing his efforts. My guess, inflation is going to start to cause significant debt and financial pressures. Much like the great depression and what helps debt.. War! It creates demand for supplies and manufacturing. It reduces the population for a short while.
Russia has law that says they can only use nuclear as retaliation or defence. Putin has explained that he has the coordinated of the Pentagon and Whitehouse and they also have nuclear capable hypersonic missiles which USA fully admits they cannot stop. Those missiles would land before the Russians need to intercept the ones from the west. The missiles are detectable on launch. Russia has missiles aboard their submarines, probably off the coast of USA already. They may also go back to Cuba.
@Baldieman1 and who was threatening nuclear ,,and sending an underwater nuclear detonation off the English coast,and whose playing with zaporizhiia nuclear plant ,don't be fooled,you speak this rhetoric then you need to be challenged
Someone asked the other day "What would you do if you got the alarm we had 30minutes left before the nukes hit?" My answer was, get as close to where its predicted to hit as possible and hope it evaporates me in an instant.
@nuttywalls8190 Poland also lobbied for a permanent US base, offering to pay $2 billion in construction costs. Plus Poland is buying F-35As, Abrams tanks, 500 HIMARS launchers, Patriot and on and on. Also spending 4% of GDP on its military Poland knows better than just about everyone else what Moscow is.
Fear can be the main source of problems in some situations. When your adversaries realize that you often take decisions based on fear, they can keep provoking your fear to weaken your reasons... leading to unreasonable and illogical decisions.
Adolf Puttin has been threatening Nato with nuclear war for over 18 months. Nato should get prepared for nuclear war. We are fools if we don't. Hey Russia if we burn so does Russia
@@jdocean1 my gripe is not with Americans it’s with our politicians they waisted enough blood and treasure in Iraq and Afghanistan and let’s be honest we were told to go to be a fig leaf for just another American war.
@@jdocean1The US is indeed the 'master' of the EU. They will do whatever their US overlords tell them to do. The US has their own masters to listen to, why else are we complicit in mass genocide in Gaza?
England overall really needs to step up its defense game. It is not the military powerhouse it once was, they don't have to be big, just leaner and meaner. Making their new carriers fuel based instead of nuclear was a huge mistake.
@@corinnewebb6424yep. RAF Lakenheath. It's been knowledge since last year (Check out - Air and Space Institute (ASI ) 💫🚀 Newark-upon-Trent Training Centre. It's part of the training for the next level of RAF Bomber command - Lancaster - Vulcan - ICMB - Space 🧑🚀✈️👩🏻🚀🚀🛰🌌 I'm from Newark The Town has always been encircled by many various RAF Airbases over time. Including *Syerston ( Vulcan crash disaster), *Winthorpe ( now a Air Museum and hosts Europe's largest Show ground events/ markets - antique fairs, Classic motoerbikes, cars shows etc)
Why bother? Trump will leave Nato. Stationing the weapons here for a year is just a useless expenditure. The UK needs to start building new warheads and delivery vehicles immediately.
@@jjefferyworboys8138 We see him as a corrupt woman abusing gangster wanna be, he's more likely to be a Putin ally because he says nice things to him. I have nothing against Americans other than one dumb orange one.
@@sithsabers and the uk will never let nato down even if the states does we faught the germans alone we can fight some eskimos..... ukraine has half the population too the uk.... imigine what the entirety of nato would do too russia it would take the entire BRICS too fight nato and even at that china be the only real issue
Nuclear weapons should be stationed in Ukraine, never mind the UK. Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons to Russia in a non military aggression pact with Russia, a pact that Russia has broken, therefore all deals should be now off the table between Russia and Ukraine.
Russia broke that agreement when they sold out to the CIA who started training , arming and funding their army in readiness for a war - the azov nazi’s under instructions from zelensky have also murdered 20000 ethnic Russian civilians living in the donbas
Times Radio what's up with all the interruptions with the mouse cursor and screen settings that sporadically pop up here and there in some of your videos??
And it will get ignored as ww3 is at stake here the west needs to grow a backbone and i ain’t talking military! These idiots protesting at the slightest thing will be the reason if we end up in a war we will loose there soft snowflakes that need to understand it’s a deterrent to stock the weapons not a provocation
@@stephenhookings1985 The UK doesn't have tactical nukes. The method for dropping the nukes was bombers, the UK no longer has bombers capable of dropping tactical nukes.
Who will be killed and who will suffer? The public ! The top politicians and rich people have bunkers to hide. 21 Century and only less than a century ago we know the sufferings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki...but these politicians don't have any brains or morals
Quite a few British politicians and in particular ex high ranking Army officers, definitely live in the past and still dream of bygone days when Brittain was a force on the world stage. Those days when the UK could just send a gun boat are long gone gents. All this warmongering talk about confronting Rissia / China are pure nonsense. It would be much wiser for the Britts to drop all sanctions against Russia and China, and make the best possible business deals with thost two nations, before their so called "Big Ally" beats them to it. Wake up UK !!!
Very well said!! The tories from mid 80's to early and mid 90's disbanded lots of regiments of the army and handed over the army jobs to civilians. Now there's acute shortage of military personnel
How about, and here’s a radical idea, we stop trying to actively start nuclear war? How about we admit our failings and provocations and broken promises and actually, hear me out here, listen to the grievances and try and get a negotiated end to a slaughter that we, by proxy, started and that we have actively encouraged and kept going. Our hands ain’t clean in this. Not by a long shot.
@@No1sonuk Before making a comment like this actually understand history. Appeasement was necessary for two reasons. Firstly WW1 was still in living memory. Nobody wanted a rerun of the slaughter of 1914 to 1918 so the politicians played to the gallery. But secondly, and more importantly, Britain was in no position to go to war due to criminal neglect of the military, much like today to be honest. Chamberlain needed time to rebuild the British military and the only way he could do it was to play for time and give Germany what they wanted. By giving in to Germany in 1938 he allowed Britain time to get their military to a somewhat better position for when war actually started in 1939. Without Chamberlains actions Britain would have fallen in 1940, well to be more accurate have been forced to the peace table, and the world would be a very different place. Because Chamberlain died in 1940 he became a convenient scapegoat because he wasn’t around to defend himself and his actions were distorted and lied about. The truth is somewhat different to what you have been taught.
@@jimjoelliejack makes a huge difference! we have our own nukes we dont need americans that are well known for causing mayhem in europe to have there fingers on the trigger button of weapons stationed here simply because the cave dwellers in iraq syria and afghan are kicking your bases out
The danger with Trump is not that he would use these weapons, it is that he would withdraw any commitment to European defense, withdraw these weapons, which essentially is to agree that Russia should be free to do what they have been doing in Syria, Georgia, and Ukraine in the rest of Eastern Europe. He would present withdrawal of defense commitments as a pro-peace move, just like the Soviet Union used to do to try and counter deployment of nuclear weapons to Europe in the 1980s.
Total misunderstanding of what Trump is doing. He is rightly tired of the relative freeloaders in the majority of NATO not even spending the agreed-upon 2%.
sensible assistance to an absolutely key ally given that the UK only has like 5 tanks and 3 infantrymen remaining in-country. we have to provide a deterrence until the UK can conscript its way out of the mess they're in; and we'll probably have to do something similar ourselves
According to the latest 2021 United Kingdom census, 3,801,186 Muslims live in England, or 6.7% of the population. The Muslim population again grew by over a million compared to the previous census.
When u receive benefits then breeding like rats will happen ,its a sharp drop from the previous census when they were paying tax credits to unlimited children
Strange statement! Do you know how many Muslims died in WW2 fighting for Breat Britain. Thousands of tribal Muslims from border area of Afghanistan where brought to England from then British India(which is now Pakistan)to take part in the war without their next of kin knowing where they were going
@@jetli740most of Europe spent the peace dividend on chips and beer. Now they haven't got any forces at all. The Belgian general says his guys will be throwing stones at the Russians since that's all they have.
I have tried to think through this Nuclear threat from a defence point of view as opposed to the attack hypothesis.All I come up with is,' first one in best dressed',Which means the complete unannounced annihilation of the entire country that keeps making the threat before it carries it out because I can see no other defence that would work sadly.In other words doing this would render this threat impossible to carry out. Off course this means one must also know were the subs where at the time and other off shore counter threats and be-able to annihilate them at the same time, a big ask.Its a complex issue from the point of defence regards the humanitarian and legal prospective but I don't think the secondary reaction,'defence' is the option regards such threats unfortunately and thats the stage of reality we are at at present.
@@franzmenzies5268 You could be right the odds are not good to avoid retaliation.Tell me what defence does one have against an invader who sends nukes instead of conventional forces then?.Just sometimes outsiders are a good bet they pay huge dividends and in this case it very well could be humanities very existence.So I think those odds as slim as they may be might just justify the risk.I respect your opinion and I hope we never have to make a decision regards this choice.
Of course the threat of reaction is the only viable option. First strike that would be guaranteed to take out all subs etc. is simply impossible and is the reason even places like NK were able to get nukes: first strike simply is too risky and likelyhood of it failing are much higher than it succeeding. The cost of failure is also huge, so first strike isn't really a rational consideration.
Don’t you think we should learn to steer boats before we start playing with pocket sized nukes. It’s like giving a kid a hand grenade before he can ride his bike. Fun fact: Zelensky has a gold fish called Captain Birdseye
The wepons we have today as compared to that time in history are far more distructive.The leathality and infastucture damage left in its wake would take years then.So, yes, we have had many wars they just dont last as long infact were at a point where a global conflict could be over in a blink of an eye now.
yes im from the uk and see no sense in this other than getting american boots on our ground we dont mind you yanks but we dont want your nukes make yourselves a target not everybody else
Well Putin has been upping the threat all along and the poor innocent USA as ever is forced to respond. NEVER let it be said the USA would act to provoke conflict in any other nation merely for economic power.
This talk about nukes prove one thing people here are ignorant the whole world will perish moving to uk does not make any situation better nukes to uk does not make it any safer
I have been thinking that with the possibility that the US will not support NATO and Europe in the event of a future European war, then the UK and France having an independent nuclear deterrent will not be enough, and if they choose to do go this way, other countries such as Germany or Poland should be prepared to go nuclear as well.
possibly the US has their finger on the trident button not the UK, so we would not have any say on other nucs. It does make the UK a front target giving the US time to defend itself.
they already said they wont. trump will win next election and pull everything out from europe hes already said so,,, always same bs america start the wars and let europe deal with then
I have many nukes in my garage just to keep my neighbors at bay. It works well, they don't even come over to borrow a hammer or even some sugar. Incidentally, my cat built them. He's a nuclear physicist, and highly intelligent on other matters as well. He's a Russian blu, to boot🙀
In the 1960's there was a joke passed around in the RAF which advised: "The treatment for gonorrhea/syphilis is to swallow an atomic pill. Next morning you wake up with a new clear weapon."
It is great that NATO is enlarged to help the US military complex sell more weapons and occupied more military bases. It's a great sell job for military suppliers, meanwhile the UK is economical broke. I wonder where the critical and pragmatic thinking is if there is any left at all.
![KAYTRANADA - Witchy (feat. Childish Gambino) [Official Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jGK3YVmGZ3Y/mqdefault.jpg)
I’m an ex British Army private ranked soldier who struggles to believe that these chaps can’t pronounce “nuclear” correctly! 😂😂😂😂 “newcular” it ain’t fellas 😂😂😂
Yeah, It should be nook-leer or knew-cleigeh
Come on, man, you know "new-cular" refers to two things: the NEW things to be put in Britain... and those "new" things have "cular" attachments --- like bino-cular, mole-cular, atomi-cular, thermo-new-cular, etc....
It *is* pronounced Nu-ku-ler, and I'm starting to understand why you never made it past private
Respect due Mark.
Yes, it's exasperating and worrying. Do you think he knows how it ought to be pronounced? He doesn't seem to know much about the subject, after all.
"it may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." Henry Kissinger
"The people are useless eaters" Henry Kissenger
@@liamcoyle6458 Was he talking of all those the US killed?
Got this on a t shirt and wear it proudly 😅
"With allies like America who needs enemies" - Me!
Very true
Nice to know the US doesn't require permission!.... Who's doubting we are not running our country 😂
@@steveblanchard7293That makes the UK a target, for sure !
@@lottielane2486 Our position in the North Atlantic and posession of nuclear weapons already makes us a target.
@@No1sonukYes only 2 Countries in Europe have Nuclear Weapons, Scotland and France. The ones near Glasgow are owned by USA.
I'm American and I swear the UN might as well be running our country , with the open borders and the BS going on
power does what it wants .. the British did in its Empire days
Most people I know still think nuclear war will never happen. When I talk about prepping food and water they think I am crazy being in Canada and safe from anything. When I served we pray for peace but prepare for the worse. Denial won’t make it go away
It likely wont. With that said, prepping food and water is still a good idea in these times. When you really think about it, something like a large power or internet outage is enough for society to completely go haywire. Food, flashlights, gas heater, radios, cash, water, medicine. its a good idea to have.
Keep us scared ,seems to be the objective,and we must hate putin.
Prepping is a good idea regardless. Nothing at all wrong with having sufficient food and water, skills to make more, being ready for power outages, disease and illness.
Agree with above responses. While I don’t think it will happen, I am also prepared with lots of ammo, food, water, basic meds, etc.
@@The_ZeroLine well you can never have too much of any of those things. Good luck 🤞
I don't think the "Doomsday clock" is a credible source for gauging threat
Exactly. It's just bunch of nuclear scientist pretending to be mind readers and their guess is about as good as the average Joe's. If you wanted any kind of actual expert, one should ask some psychiatrist to evalute Putin and base it on that, but even that would still not be much better than a guess.
Nor do I ,the credible force here is the continued threat of using nuclear weapons not a clock it goes tick tock a nuclear weapon goes boom in a big way.I wish we had never discovered fire whilst grunting in the caves because kids with matches not a good mix .Sorry I had to belittle the human race but we seem to be loosing our sanity.Perhaps we could blame earths ongoing polarity shift for that?
I always think of the Iron Maiden song "Two minutes to midnight" when they bring that one up.
@@tolrem I remember that song ,'in the year 25 25 if man is still alive'.2024 is the year of the Scorpio.
Exactly. The scientist adjusting the clock are basically guessing just like everyone else. They don't have a crystal ball and can't read the mind of people making relevant decisions.
Well done, now Putin knows where to strike first !!!
.great….make us the target. Did anyone ask us if we stick up for Ukraine.
Exactly. Thanks. Where will Putin strike the USA because they are their nukes or the place they are coming from. Idiotic. 80s here we come again.
I think they have already planned potential nuclear targets years ago.
@@minkgin3370 We were already targets, I can't remember if it was Putin or The Kremlin that said that if nuclear war did break out then they would hit London first.
@@yourma2000and Moscow get hit at the same time
Who
Wins ?
America smartly avoids any damages in its home land.
Biden was asked by a member of the public last year, do you think there will be a war in Europe his reply was if there is don't worry it won't affect America
Russia would still strike it, just for fun!
America would also be devastated by Russian nukes when this nuclear war eventually happens and it's coming !!!
So wouldn't we all.
The UK has enough nuclear weapons to turn the entire russian population to 0 by its own and start a nuclear winter. What Russia and the US have is just an exaggeration that serves to deter each other, dont fall into propaganda
I am so sick of our current crime minister
He is 100 percent in th pocket of the WEF,and a spoilt billionaire who has never done a days graft in his life,so he will do whatever his sick masters tell him to
But you love Pooty don't you?
Which ones? They come and go within months...
@@timothychung4811 On the other hand Putin has been there 21 years and has built an empire of corruption and is now dictator for life. Yeah, whinge about PM being voted out because of your ignorance
Why would they do this when we have our own nuclear weapons?
dont be so sure about that weapons that you have are yours. They were given by U.S
You can never have too many toys.
Literally explained in the video. We only have large strategic nukes from subs. These will be land based tactical nukes
@@user-vc5zt9ci12 perfectly understood, my question is why place any nuclear weapons on Uk soil when we already have some, the deterrent is clear, tactical nuclear weapons are just another reaction to any nuclear weapons used or threatened to be used against Uk soil, if we get to that stage nothing really matters!
@@davidkennedy8929 OK, I understand. So the difference is whether we provide support if nukes are used in Europe. I'm on the side of yes as I don't think neutrality would work in the long term... therefore we need all capabilities. Just my view - I respect yours
Why can’t people pronounce nuclear as opposed to nucular weapons
Because your pronunciation is wrong
@@leonodonoghueburke4276 I'd suggest yours is. It's not a silent 'A' in nucleAr.
"Nu-clear"! Not nu-cu-ler!
It is YOUR ignorance, not "other people's pronunciation".
In case you need to be educated how nuclear work just to get you fully prepared when things go booooobbo😂😂😂😂@@leonodonoghueburke4276
The state of the world now. I would not bring a child into this fiasco. Such tragic times.😢
The madness continues
blame it on madman putin
baggie trousers😮
Clown has no idea what deterrence means. Would hand over Eastern Europe to Russia in the name of peace. 🤡
@roywatson8133 Sometimes, it feels like Putin is the only adult in the room. I suggest we pursue a peace agreement like was in place March 2022 that BoJo & Lloyd Austin told Zelensky not to sign. It's always a mistake listening to these neo-cons from the West.
@@denniscrork318 That so called peace agreement was fake. Not all of us are willing to bend over for Putin. If you can't see what Putin is up to then more fool you.
We dont want them bloody making us more of a target ffs😢
Exactly.
Are you mad? We are all under the one banner it’s called NATO is does not matter what weapons are stocked anywhere attack on 1 is attack on all either way Russia wld strike the UK as we’re closer and smaller
@Dom-py6tr It certainly won’t help matters imho
@Dom-py6trThe US is not free or safe either.
I get you. But we've been a target for a very very long time. ☮️🕊️
Russia is not our enemy
Amazing how they don't pronounce "nuclear" properly.
Pity these people dont work as hard for peace.
Here here. ☮️
NATO, killing people in a peaceful way.
Putin don’t know peace Putin only knows strength … once you show him strength then he goes back to his dog house
Spot on.
Exactly.
Isn't this guy is the one who says Iraq has WMD along side Tony Blair
That was George bush
wrong country clown
It is ridiculous to believe that the Russians had ambitions to take all of Ukraine, let alone any other country in eastern Europe because they came in with only 150 thousand military - a ridiculously small number- which would not even ever be enough to occupy half of Ukraine. There was no danger for the WEST beyond the need for negotiations with Russia who only demanded the promise from the Ukr to never join NATO because that would bring nuclear missiles far too close to Moscou and their silos. The NATO has been salivating for decades about making a first strike as effective as possible. There are some seriously deranged people at the top in Nato. Putin avoided a situation that would have led to a first strike by NATO, leading to enough nuclear retaliation to cause a nuclear winter on the northern hemisphere...
finally, someone who gets it
We have to worry about the west and nato not putin
Exactly, these people & the MSM are absolutely crazy.
Slick argument from a Putin apologist. In fact, ever since the special military operation broke down Russia has repeatedly threatened the West with nuclear war.
Listen to yourselves if you only new what America are capable of.
Look out “just stop oil”
Here comes “Ban the Bomb”. 😮😂
care to try to make sense of what you wrote
fly the flag and rejoice we must ban the bomb
@@iohnxxxx Banning nuclear bombs worldwide is impossible
@@iohnxxxx We?.. Who precisely? Russia? China? North Korea?
☮️
They are making sure we are in this upto our necks.
We always have been ,now please put your big pants on
We always have been.. Even without nukes on land! We have nukes and that makes us a target
@@srjwariGrow up these disgusting warmongers need to worry about those of us who will fight this.
@@Leigh-ry3yb I'm likely older and wider then you. And I agree, it's going to be anyone under 41 who will end up dragged into a war they don't want to fight in.
But the reality is buddy.. If you look at what's going on around the world and you compare it to historic events we're heading towards a main conflict.
You can bury your head in the sand if you like but that won't change a thing.
Look. I don't want war. I don't want innocent people dieing in general. But I didn't want Ukraine to get into war with Russia.
I didn't want inflation or CVD19.. All of these happened and burying my head in the sand didn't do a thing.
The facts are we're heading towards a conflict and it's going to take clear heads and grown ups round a table to figuire it out.
Let's look at who's leading the world right now.. They can't be trusted. And putin he's not backing down despite what western media tells us. He's increasing his efforts.
My guess, inflation is going to start to cause significant debt and financial pressures. Much like the great depression and what helps debt.. War!
It creates demand for supplies and manufacturing. It reduces the population for a short while.
@@Leigh-ry3ybyou're going to fight this? Ok then. From the sofa probly.
NO SUPPORT FOR NEO-CON WARS
Everyone sees right through you
This speaker is the kind of people pushing to escalation and will celebrate lighting the match but the first to run away once it's lit!
Russia has law that says they can only use nuclear as retaliation or defence. Putin has explained that he has the coordinated of the Pentagon and Whitehouse and they also have nuclear capable hypersonic missiles which USA fully admits they cannot stop. Those missiles would land before the Russians need to intercept the ones from the west. The missiles are detectable on launch. Russia has missiles aboard their submarines, probably off the coast of USA already. They may also go back to Cuba.
That's complete nonsense
@@thankstrek5759 No it is not,the geezer is willing a nuclear war ffs
Great description of vladolf Putler. Or, "uncle bunker" as the Russ' call him
@Baldieman1 and who was threatening nuclear ,,and sending an underwater nuclear detonation off the English coast,and whose playing with zaporizhiia nuclear plant ,don't be fooled,you speak this rhetoric then you need to be challenged
Someone asked the other day "What would you do if you got the alarm we had 30minutes left before the nukes hit?" My answer was, get as close to where its predicted to hit as possible and hope it evaporates me in an instant.
It's less then 4 minutes mate. i would just run. Towards the blast.
Its the 80's all over again
Me too. But we won't have 30 minutes. We'll be lucky if we get 3 minutes. And no way of knowing where it's going to hit. Sorry. Time up. ☮️🕊️
I'd have that sort of mentality if I was stuck in En-gland for ANY reason!
NO to nukes, madness!
UK like to escalate nothing to something threaten,
Poland has been openly asking to host B-61s for more than a year.
@nuttywalls8190 Poland also lobbied for a permanent US base, offering to pay $2 billion in construction costs.
Plus Poland is buying F-35As, Abrams tanks, 500 HIMARS launchers, Patriot and on and on.
Also spending 4% of GDP on its military
Poland knows better than just about everyone else what Moscow is.
@Chuck_Hooks exactly
@nuttywalls8190putins friends benefit from this war
@nuttywalls8190 ??
@nuttywalls8190 Putler guy?
Wow these jokers are recommending nuclear war, England has two aircraft carriers which dont work and 70 tanks and an army less than 10% of Russia.
Can this government please stop poking the damm bare. I know the government doesn't give a damm about the people's opinion, but JUST STOP!!
I know, right? Russia keeps escalating a battle it can't win. What are they thinking?
ps. 'DEMOCRACY': is based on the precept that two morons are smarter than one genius.
I don't remember giving anyone else the right to have a war.Who is anyone on this earth to dictate to us .
Fear can be the main source of problems in some situations. When your adversaries realize that you often take decisions based on fear, they can keep provoking your fear to weaken your reasons... leading to unreasonable and illogical decisions.
Adolf Puttin has been threatening Nato with nuclear war for over 18 months. Nato should get prepared for nuclear war. We are fools if we don't. Hey Russia if we burn so does Russia
They can stick their nuclear missiles back where the sun don't shine
Well said. ☮️🕊️
Not the ol' nuclear weapon threat again
Our elites are out of touch and mad. The people won't be following them.
I applaude your journalism telling where the nuclear weapons be sited, very good, very very good, now we can all share the informants know how. 👏
What Russian threat, have I missed something???
I think you have ,sorry to inform you, but in your absence Putin invaded Ukraine.
No just no we need a government that acts in the interests of the people of this country not whatever our American masters tell us
We’re not your masters. We’d like to think we’re friends with mutual interests.
@@jdocean1 my gripe is not with Americans it’s with our politicians they waisted enough blood and treasure in Iraq and Afghanistan and let’s be honest we were told to go to be a fig leaf for just another American war.
@@jdocean1The US is indeed the 'master' of the EU. They will do whatever their US overlords tell them to do. The US has their own masters to listen to, why else are we complicit in mass genocide in Gaza?
You'll end up with Russian masters if you're not careful 😂
Right, partners even brothers with England. I think that is how most Americans feel. Same sentiment with France, they are family.@@jdocean1
If you have kids, it doesn't look like the future is great.
there is no threat your just causing a threat
Should rebuild Greenham airbase which had the longest runway in Europe. It even has hardened bunkers for missile storage.
Yeah. Greenham is no more. But not to worry we'll have them at Lakenheath. 😱☮️🕊️
England overall really needs to step up its defense game. It is not the military powerhouse it once was, they don't have to be big, just leaner and meaner. Making their new carriers fuel based instead of nuclear was a huge mistake.
@@corinnewebb6424yep.
RAF Lakenheath.
It's been knowledge since last year
(Check out -
Air and Space Institute (ASI ) 💫🚀 Newark-upon-Trent Training Centre.
It's part of the training for the next level of
RAF Bomber command -
Lancaster
-
Vulcan
-
ICMB
-
Space
🧑🚀✈️👩🏻🚀🚀🛰🌌
I'm from Newark
The Town has always been encircled by many various RAF Airbases over time.
Including
*Syerston ( Vulcan crash disaster), *Winthorpe ( now a Air Museum and hosts Europe's largest Show ground events/ markets - antique fairs, Classic motoerbikes, cars shows etc)
So true!
Machrihanish on West of Scotland was also used I believe.
Why bother? Trump will leave Nato. Stationing the weapons here for a year is just a useless expenditure. The UK needs to start building new warheads and delivery vehicles immediately.
Trump sees the UK as a very close ally.
Uk and usa will stand together regardless of nato
@@jjefferyworboys8138 We see him as a corrupt woman abusing gangster wanna be, he's more likely to be a Putin ally because he says nice things to him. I have nothing against Americans other than one dumb orange one.
@@jjefferyworboys8138 UK is a Nato Nation. If Trump leaves Nato or discredits article 5 it's a back stab for the UK all the same.
@@sithsabers and the uk will never let nato down even if the states does we faught the germans alone we can fight some eskimos..... ukraine has half the population too the uk.... imigine what the entirety of nato would do too russia it would take the entire BRICS too fight nato and even at that china be the only real issue
Putin is too scared to ever use a nuke.
Nuclear weapons should be stationed in Ukraine, never mind the UK. Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons to Russia in a non military aggression pact with Russia, a pact that Russia has broken, therefore all deals should be now off the table between Russia and Ukraine.
Russia broke that agreement when they sold out to the CIA who started training , arming and funding their army in readiness for a war - the azov nazi’s under instructions from zelensky have also murdered 20000 ethnic Russian civilians living in the donbas
All this started in 2014 , after the failed military coup by USA, they also tried the same trick in turkey the following year- go Russia 🇷🇺
@@muckle8Seeing you Russian trolls everywhere just proves that Mad Vlad is crying 😂
@@muckle8 Nicely pasted there Putin bot, enjoy your potatoe this month and keep warm lol
@@oasis67you mean people who don't believe the propaganda, all this talk prove Ukraine is getting slapped
Times Radio what's up with all the interruptions with the mouse cursor and screen settings that sporadically pop up here and there in some of your videos??
Time to annex Kaliningrad.
Rename it, New Texas.
go for it, talk is cheap
Don't you think the people of U.K. should have a say whether they want to be a USA aircraft carrier or not
The people of the U.K. have such a weak miitary that they should be thankful that anyone would be on their side.
Hamish is back with more gibberish, as if the Spring/Summer Offensive wasn't enough for him.
I wonder if my grandad has received deja vu...
Remember in 2022 when Russia and Belarus threatened to nuke the UK
Never happened, they stated they have the same deterrent. As your prime minister said shed happily nuke a state, implying russia
@@bryandimery6509 it did happen they even had a video, look it up.
yup, and then shortly afterwards putin had a hissy fit because the queen didn't invite him to her birthday.
@@jamesdawson2510so they did not actually threaten to nuke the UK, you are just trying to help push propaganda
talk about never happened@@bryandimery6509
NATO makes Europe safer? yeah right pull the other one
My friends in Suffolk are not impressed and say they will join any protest organised. Don’t think they will be the only ones.
And it will get ignored as ww3 is at stake here the west needs to grow a backbone and i ain’t talking military! These idiots protesting at the slightest thing will be the reason if we end up in a war we will loose there soft snowflakes that need to understand it’s a deterrent to stock the weapons not a provocation
P.S tell Karen I said hi 👋
what a pie of uk already has nuclear weapons
So take out a tactical battlefield target with a monster strategic weapon?
We have the big strategic nukes, these ones they're talking about are small tactical nukes.
France and UK have tactical ones too. But it is academic because they wouldn't be used for long.
France and UK have tactical ones too. But it is academic because they wouldn't be used for long.
@@stephenhookings1985 The UK doesn't have tactical nukes. The method for dropping the nukes was bombers, the UK no longer has bombers capable of dropping tactical nukes.
We dont want nukes 😢what on earth is happening to this world ???
Who will be killed and who will suffer? The public ! The top politicians and rich people have bunkers to hide. 21 Century and only less than a century ago we know the sufferings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki...but these politicians don't have any brains or morals
Please don’t respond to paid Russian Bots.
Ignore them don’t fund them because they are paid per response.
@jameslynch7826 Is it good pay?
yes we are paid handsomely,slava russia@@boota1979
Putin could see this as a threat.
About time people and countries stopped worrying about what Putin thinks.
Good for him he likes to threaten others
So now we are a target......A little island that could be peppered with nuclear bombs......Fantastic!
Quite a few British politicians and in particular ex high ranking Army officers, definitely live in the past and still dream of bygone days when Brittain was a force on the world stage. Those days when the UK could just send a gun boat are long gone gents. All this warmongering talk about confronting Rissia / China are pure nonsense. It would be much wiser for the Britts to drop all sanctions against Russia and China, and make the best possible business deals with thost two nations, before their so called "Big Ally" beats them to it. Wake up UK !!!
Very well said!! The tories from mid 80's to early and mid 90's disbanded lots of regiments of the army and handed over the army jobs to civilians. Now there's acute shortage of military personnel
You don't seem to understand that Brtiain is not Britian alone. It has allies, and its biggest ally is the strongest army in the world.
Strongest army in the world ? You mean China is an ally of the UK. Really ?@@itheuserfirst3186
Thats the way to go. US cannot be threatened by russia
How about, and here’s a radical idea, we stop trying to actively start nuclear war? How about we admit our failings and provocations and broken promises and actually, hear me out here, listen to the grievances and try and get a negotiated end to a slaughter that we, by proxy, started and that we have actively encouraged and kept going. Our hands ain’t clean in this. Not by a long shot.
Appeasement didn't work out too well in 1939. What makes you think it would work now?
@@No1sonuk Before making a comment like this actually understand history. Appeasement was necessary for two reasons. Firstly WW1 was still in living memory. Nobody wanted a rerun of the slaughter of 1914 to 1918 so the politicians played to the gallery.
But secondly, and more importantly, Britain was in no position to go to war due to criminal neglect of the military, much like today to be honest. Chamberlain needed time to rebuild the British military and the only way he could do it was to play for time and give Germany what they wanted. By giving in to Germany in 1938 he allowed Britain time to get their military to a somewhat better position for when war actually started in 1939. Without Chamberlains actions Britain would have fallen in 1940, well to be more accurate have been forced to the peace table, and the world would be a very different place.
Because Chamberlain died in 1940 he became a convenient scapegoat because he wasn’t around to defend himself and his actions were distorted and lied about. The truth is somewhat different to what you have been taught.
Uk government should not allow this to happen . The uk should be neutrality
STOP SAYING NUCULAR, IT'S NUCLEAR
If NATO or the Brits intervene in Ukraine, these will be the last days for London😂😂😂
Keep topping up the anxiety Times Radio, exactly what everyone needs, or are you on commission for an increase in the nation’s uptake of SSRIs?
That’s good of the Yanks,that makes us even more of a target
Putins been threatening to nuke us multiple times already, what’s the difference? 🤷♀️
FFS you already are a target, it makes no difference
We where a target the day we helped Ukraine
@@jimjoelliejack makes a huge difference! we have our own nukes we dont need americans that are well known for causing mayhem in europe to have there fingers on the trigger button of weapons stationed here simply because the cave dwellers in iraq syria and afghan are kicking your bases out
Well no, it gives us strength, would you mess with the USA ?
UK should stay out of it
Not in my name, nobody wins a war…people wake up.
"Doomsday clock reset to 90 seconds to midnight"
No, it remained at 90 seconds to midnight, the same position it has been for a Year or 2 already
Top Secret , here is where the missiles are going to be stored .
Russia has right to defend itself
The rhetoric is absolutely deafening
I thought uk 🇬🇧 had nukes already
"Do you believe the story in The Telegraph?" "I think I probably believe it."
Listening to times radio, who have gotten EVERYTHING wrong on ukraine is a REAAAAALLY smart idea
Why should someone listen to a poor, primitive PROPAGANDA-CHENNEL...🤣🙆
care to cite examples of "EVERYTHING".
Wow,and my first comment were deleted already...🤣😂
Examples? 🤡
@@drecepy6213 was it racist? Cause its alotta racist comments on this channel
Nuclear weapons have kept the peace?! How many wars have we had since 1945?
A lot!
We are talking our way into WW3....
Why would Putin use a Nuke in Ukraine. Please explain, as this make no sense at this stage in the conflict.
Fear fear fear 😂😂😂😂
When someone fires a missile at you you fire a missile back to where it came from, you don’t check who actually owns it first…
The danger with Trump is not that he would use these weapons, it is that he would withdraw any commitment to European defense, withdraw these weapons, which essentially is to agree that Russia should be free to do what they have been doing in Syria, Georgia, and Ukraine in the rest of Eastern Europe. He would present withdrawal of defense commitments as a pro-peace move, just like the Soviet Union used to do to try and counter deployment of nuclear weapons to Europe in the 1980s.
Please… stop believing everything you read in the liberal media…
Total misunderstanding of what Trump is doing.
He is rightly tired of the relative freeloaders in the majority of NATO not even spending the agreed-upon 2%.
Thank god there's someone with some common sense totally agree.👍@@Chuck_Hooks
@@Chuck_Hooksnot anymore.
@@slavcpanigaz846not anymore what ?
sensible assistance to an absolutely key ally given that the UK only has like 5 tanks and 3 infantrymen remaining in-country. we have to provide a deterrence until the UK can conscript its way out of the mess they're in; and we'll probably have to do something similar ourselves
No one seems to be able to pronounce "nuclear" correctly these days
Keep worrying about the important things.
This Times Radio channel is posting WW3 alerts daily and around the clock. How can this end well?
I would like to know how that so called news station ever got a licence to broadcast, it's more like a Goebbels outlet.
More scared of creepy Joe than Putin.
2..05 "If Russia does use a tactical nuclear weapon in ukraine, THIS would give NATO the chance to use a tactical nuclear missile"
WHY??
Selfishness of politicians is staggering.....
Well its back to the cold war again
It’s against Low emissions regulations.It’s against Humanity
According to the latest 2021 United Kingdom census, 3,801,186 Muslims live in England, or 6.7% of the population. The Muslim population again grew by over a million compared to the previous census.
Who cares, what does that have to do with anything.
Most dont want any hassle but its the few who do are the issue .
When u receive benefits then breeding like rats will happen ,its a sharp drop from the previous census when they were paying tax credits to unlimited children
Strange statement! Do you know how many Muslims died in WW2 fighting for Breat Britain. Thousands of tribal Muslims from border area of Afghanistan where brought to England from then British India(which is now Pakistan)to take part in the war without their next of kin knowing where they were going
Poor UK still colonized by USA 😢😢
Why poor? We have the best weapons in the world because of this and afterall they are the ones speaking English.
@@UkSapyy no you dont, your new carrier barely function
@@jetli740most of Europe spent the peace dividend on chips and beer. Now they haven't got any forces at all. The Belgian general says his guys will be throwing stones at the Russians since that's all they have.
More civilized countries need to join NATO.
There aren’t any civilised countries left
they cant..... its a european alaince most countries tried to join inc russia in the past but all rejected due to geography and diplomacy
The Greenham Common Ladies, will be shaking in their Zimmer frames.
😂 -? I remember them. Left over bedraggled hippies gathered around a guy called Monsignor Kent like some harem. What a funny time that was.
I have tried to think through this Nuclear threat from a defence point of view as opposed to the attack hypothesis.All I come up with is,' first one in best dressed',Which means the complete unannounced annihilation of the entire country that keeps making the threat before it carries it out because I can see no other defence that would work sadly.In other words doing this would render this threat impossible to carry out. Off course this means one must also know were the subs where at the time and other off shore counter threats and be-able to annihilate them at the same time, a big ask.Its a complex issue from the point of defence regards the humanitarian and legal prospective but I don't think the secondary reaction,'defence' is the option regards such threats unfortunately and thats the stage of reality we are at at present.
A poor bet. The retaliation is guaranteed.
@@franzmenzies5268 You could be right the odds are not good to avoid retaliation.Tell me what defence does one have against an invader who sends nukes instead of conventional forces then?.Just sometimes outsiders are a good bet they pay huge dividends and in this case it very well could be humanities very existence.So I think those odds as slim as they may be might just justify the risk.I respect your opinion and I hope we never have to make a decision regards this choice.
Of course the threat of reaction is the only viable option. First strike that would be guaranteed to take out all subs etc. is simply impossible and is the reason even places like NK were able to get nukes: first strike simply is too risky and likelyhood of it failing are much higher than it succeeding. The cost of failure is also huge, so first strike isn't really a rational consideration.
No nukes. No nukes. No one should have them. Did we learn nothing from past history 💔
Don’t you think we should learn to steer boats before we start playing with pocket sized nukes. It’s like giving a kid a hand grenade before he can ride his bike. Fun fact: Zelensky has a gold fish called Captain Birdseye
It’s a deterrent and nothing more, NATO doesn’t need nukes to decimate Russias garbage military.
The wepons we have today as compared to that time in history are far more distructive.The leathality and infastucture damage left in its wake would take years then.So, yes, we have had many wars they just dont last as long infact were at a point where a global conflict could be over in a blink of an eye now.
Don't the UK already have them ??? They have them on their subs at least.
yes im from the uk and see no sense in this other than getting american boots on our ground we dont mind you yanks but we dont want your nukes make yourselves a target not everybody else
Well Putin has been upping the threat all along and the poor innocent USA as ever is forced to respond.
NEVER let it be said the USA would act to provoke conflict in any other nation merely for economic power.
sarcasm i presume? 😕
This talk about nukes prove one thing people here are ignorant the whole world will perish moving to uk does not make any situation better nukes to uk does not make it any safer
I have been thinking that with the possibility that the US will not support NATO and Europe in the event of a future European war, then the UK and France having an independent nuclear deterrent will not be enough, and if they choose to do go this way, other countries such as Germany or Poland should be prepared to go nuclear as well.
possibly the US has their finger on the trident button not the UK, so we would not have any say on other nucs. It does make the UK a front target giving the US time to defend itself.
Think you that’s what I been saying the hold time.
they already said they wont. trump will win next election and pull everything out from europe hes already said so,,, always same bs america start the wars and let europe deal with then
@@waltermcphee3787 You claim UK doesn't have control of their own nuclear weapons in their submarines etc?
Of course it doesn't! Do you really believe the US would give total control of the firepower of the Trident system to another country?@@cyberfunk3793
I don’t think the USA, should put the lives of the people of the UK in danger
I have many nukes in my garage just to keep my neighbors at bay. It works well, they don't even come over to borrow a hammer or even some sugar. Incidentally, my cat built them. He's a nuclear physicist, and highly intelligent on other matters as well. He's a Russian blu, to boot🙀
In the 1960's there was a joke passed around in the RAF which advised: "The treatment for gonorrhea/syphilis is to swallow an atomic pill. Next morning you wake up with a new clear weapon."
It is great that NATO is enlarged to help the US military complex sell more weapons and occupied more military bases. It's a great sell job for military suppliers, meanwhile the UK is economical broke. I wonder where the critical and pragmatic thinking is if there is any left at all.
Don't worry, the war machine will make some people very very rich!
Na I think your wong on that won
@@PureEnigma you are wrong, US use threat to sell weapon.
It's called having "allies." Russia doesn't.