Also Robbie, Manchester United finished 3rd last season and look where they are now!!! Maybe the Glazers don’t care about that club. Maybe they refused to back Ten Hag???
I would swap with Man. Utd for sure. And I would swap Ange for Poch, but it is obvious Ange has got the nod. Ange is good at selling hopes and dreams which keeps the fans off Levy's back. I think Daniel Levy is scared stiff of Spurs actually winning anything, because he would see that to maintain that top level approach would mean continually spending. Ange might be a motivator but Poch. is a coach, and if your focus is on young players we desperately need a coach, with progressive tactical thinking. I have said repeatedly all season that Ange is too stubborn with his team system and tactics, and it is unrealistic to expect anything next season other than what we have seen since the Chelsea game this last season. I would take Poch. back in a heartbeat. He built us up from nowhere, and new when the team needed renewal. It is totally unfair to say that he had lost the plot when he was sacked. He new what was required but the board wouldn't back him at the time due to the cost of the new stadium. He was the manager and stood up for what our team was calling out for. He should be applauded not berated, for what he saw was in the best interests of the team. He was badly treated and deserves another go, if he would in fact accept it, if offered. He is also a great coach and with the current young talent that we have, and the new scouting set-up he never had, I could really see us going places. Ange despite all his rhetoric cannot manage one game a week. On the other hand Poch. with the talent that we now have, plus a couple of astute signings that we are going to get anyway, will be able to manage multiple games in a week, as he has demonstrated in the past. With Poch. I could feel confident, with Ange even with his good start, I have never felt comfortable, because of his stubbornness, and the huge gaps his tactics leave all over the place. He is a squeaky-bum manager. We should be a club getting the manager Poch. to train us; not a club to give someone Ange their first crack at the big-time, wasting even more time of our player's career's. COYS.
Robbie, if Daniel Levy really cares about the club, he would be paying the money for needed players and would not haggle with the prices!!!
Let's hope the manager is backed🤞
Also Robbie, Manchester United finished 3rd last season and look where they are now!!! Maybe the Glazers don’t care about that club. Maybe they refused to back Ten Hag???
He's likely getting sacked after the final from what I'm reading
@@LilywhiteLane whether win or lose!!
I would swap with Man. Utd for sure. And I would swap Ange for Poch, but it is obvious Ange has got the nod.
Ange is good at selling hopes and dreams which keeps the fans off Levy's back.
I think Daniel Levy is scared stiff of Spurs actually winning anything, because he would see that to maintain that top level approach would mean continually spending.
Ange might be a motivator but Poch. is a coach, and if your focus is on young players we desperately need a coach, with progressive tactical thinking.
I have said repeatedly all season that Ange is too stubborn with his team system and tactics, and it is unrealistic to expect anything next season other than what we have seen since the Chelsea game this last season.
I would take Poch. back in a heartbeat. He built us up from nowhere, and new when the team needed renewal.
It is totally unfair to say that he had lost the plot when he was sacked. He new what was required but the board wouldn't back him at the time due to the cost of the new stadium. He was the manager and stood up for what our team was calling out for. He should be applauded not berated, for what he saw was in the best interests of the team.
He was badly treated and deserves another go, if he would in fact accept it, if offered.
He is also a great coach and with the current young talent that we have, and the new scouting set-up he never had, I could really see us going places.
Ange despite all his rhetoric cannot manage one game a week.
On the other hand Poch. with the talent that we now have, plus a couple of astute signings that we are going to get anyway, will be able to manage multiple games in a week, as he has demonstrated in the past.
With Poch. I could feel confident, with Ange even with his good start, I have never felt comfortable, because of his stubbornness, and the huge gaps his tactics leave all over the place. He is a squeaky-bum manager.
We should be a club getting the manager Poch. to train us; not a club to give someone Ange their first crack at the big-time, wasting even more time of our player's career's. COYS.
A lot of good points made there mate,agree with a lot of what you've said👍