I knew her story didnt up when she said she got a perm, then had a shower... which the cardinal rule of perm maintenance is that you're forbidden to wet your hair for at least 24 hours after getting a perm at the risk of deactivating the ammonium thioglycolate
I knew the pool boy who claimed to be having an affair was lying when he confirmed that he had a boyfriend, but then tried to explain that he thought we meant his best friend, but his boyfriend, who was in the courtroom, got upset and told us that he was Gay and European.
thats the vibe I got as well, otherwise she could have easily denied it and kept up with her lie with no way to prove she wrote the letter. That attorney is definitely going to lose their liscense and maybe even see some jail time and fines for that
Yeah "courts are biased against men to the point even the best father ever will lose custody to a mother who barely isn't negligent or abuses the kids, but let's just try to lose the case by discrediting the father with lies"...lol
@@charginginprogresss I mean, yes and no, you still have to discredit the father in the scenario you brought up for the court to rule in favor of the mother, it's just that the court is more likely to believe what the mother has to say when she claims to be a better fit for their children 🤔
One time in high school, we were assigned into teams to debate a hypothetical scenario. The scenario was whether or not a hypothetical high school student should drop out of school and get a job as a waitress, and I was assigned to Team Yes. My teammates and I managed to piece together a decent enough argument, but the leader of Team No really dropped the ball for his team. The entire crux of his personal argument rested on this fictional high school student somehow *losing the ability to read and write* after dropping out. Don't remember if a winner was ever declared, but he certainly didn't do his team any favors.
Losing the ability to read? XD They couldn't have just said it greatly limited her career growth options? That sounds like a really easy case to advise against dropping out, especially in our highly specialized economy where a highschool degree barely gets you a job at mcdonalds.
in high school, we had a debate about if Karl Marx should be put on trial because of bad events happened in countries attempting Communism, I was Marx, and we managed to confuse the other team and make them focus on a "communism bad" narrative for their arguments
We had a high school debate once and I don't remember the actual question very well but one guy insisted to go first on behalf of his team as if he had this major breakthrough but his entire argument was "smart people should have more rights"
I got the opposite experience the "Oh shit we're fucked". It was a Medicaid case where we were fighting to get our client the device he needed. Our key witness was his doctor. She was doing great then all of a sudden she says that our client never tried any of the other devices she said he did in earlier documents, she was just using language the company selling the device told her to use. She never told me or my partner that. After that the rest of the case was pointless as she had to try other devices and dismiss them. Didn't matter that he still needed the device. Didn't matter that the other devices were just as expensive. We were fucked and we knew it.
13:27 This is such a famously dumb way to lose that it's straight up a meme. I forget the wording that's usually used, but it's something like "What were you wearing on the night you strangled your girlfriend?" or similar. You would think that lawyers would be specifically taught about this one, since it's such a simple and obvious way to get tricked into saying 'yes' to something you'd otherwise never say yes to.
@@torgranael The attorney can shout objection leading and the judge will say sustained and the witness will be able to ignore the question. However, if the witness says "yes" it doesnt matter what the attorney or the judge says anymore. Its technically a scummy move but its still a self-own by the witness.
A favorite story that I read on this subject is the plaintiff was claiming permanent disability from an accident. He was suing his insurance company who disputed the permanence. The insurance company hired an investigator who got pictures of the plaintiff doing roof work on his house. Climbing up and down the ladder, lugging hefty tools, moving around on the roof, etc. His lawyer didn’t object to the photos being submitted as evidence and the guy looked super smug. His idiotic explanation was that as he was not a licensed contractor his work on the roof should not be counted as work. Yeah the judge wasn’t buying it.
Lawyer could just have said, "My client has good days and bad days. These must have been taken on one of the rare good days, but those are too unpredictable to hold down steady employment, and thus my client needs disability to pay the bills." That's how most disabilities work.
okay that "admit" on the questionaire is stupid. like yeah its a "gotcha" question but... thats why you dont ever answer with yes or no, you answer with yes or no and a confirmation of the question. so not "admit" but "I admit our dog was not leashed". not even a law thing, just... in general, answer your questions like that.
My "Hold it" moment I knew I would win was in a murder case. Long story short, my childhood friend had this girlfriend that was cheating on him, but she had taken a clock he made that looked like a statue to her trip overseas. When that statue came up in court, I pressed Y and shouted HOLD IT, then proceeded to dismantle the prosecutor's case piece by piece with all the evidence I had on the bottom screen!
12:21 yes, and so it happened, the friend lawyer did not notice until OP showed them the contract didnt have their signature and told them about that clause
I have a story for this. One time, as a paralegal, we were in court regarding ownership of a house and representing the Plaintiff. During the cross-examination of the Plaintiff, I realized that I accidentally also included the deed and deed history of another property that our client owned, but was not related to the case, in the trial brief. When the Defendant was being cross-examined, she said that the reason she fully owned the property was because she traded her partial ownership of the other property, which she had never said before. I pulled the deed history of the other property, to keep up and realized she was never on the deed. I quickly signed my boss to come over and saw his eyes immediately light up when he saw the deed history. They settled pretty quickly in court after that
13:42 the question is sneaky, like as kids when someone would go "does your mom know you're gay" and whoever they asked says no without thinking about it
My mother had to go on disability years back. Various health issues. There was one doctor arguing against her getting it. My mothers attorney was able to prove not only that her arguments were false. But that this doctor never actually saw or was ever in the place to observe her at all. Literally talking out her ass based on nothing.
Without fail, every single time: “Y: X, what was a time that this happened to you? Not X, but-“ Like my guy we still get something out of it regardless and it’s still relevant, stop whining.
My dad’s custody case was sort of the opposite of a “Got You” thing and more like a nightmare for everybody that’s involved. He was poor because he was basically taking care of the big needs for my siblings by himself. She didn’t take them to dentists, doctors, or anything, and he needed to raise three kids by himself, so he had resorted to researching and representing himself in court. Luckily for him, she lied to her lawyers and constantly cycled them out so she wouldn’t need to pay any major fees. Every new guy that came in was ready with a “solid case” and the judge would immediately tell the lawyer “Your arguments have been given already. We are just here to talk about some custody concerns.” She was uncooperative, annoying and none of the kids liked her. As much as the courts wanted to keep the kids with their mother, my dad remarried within the time these custody battles were happening and it was apparent that it was best for the kids to go with my dad. She wasn’t happy, but there wasn’t a single person in that court room that didn’t think Justice was served.
i have a cop friend who was handling a stabbing incident while questioning the stabber was asked: "Did you stab thee victim?" she answered yes the next question: "Did you commit the crime?" answer no I laughed about that for like 2 months
10:25 in video...the judge who used the pun on shells while saying "on any plans they may be hatching" placed an Easter egg in her ruling and hence a hidden pun among other puns!
Fighting for custody as a man without a lawyer is like trying to beat an NBA team with your friends who all have sprained ankles😭 you’re not winning unless it’s outright given to you by the opposition😂
This isn't a "HOLD IT" moment although they tried making it out like that. I once had to testify as a kid in a case, I was only 11 but I was smart. I used the phrase "out of harm's way" which I'd heard many times before on TV. As soon as I said it, the guy stopped me and asked me where I'd heard that phrase from and I mumbled something about a book, because I didn't want to admit that I'd heard it watching WWE.
7:56 said $1800 but on screen it showed $800. But given that it was 3 * (2 * $300) it was obviously $1800, but it did throw me for a loop there for a second.
Needed to get a restraining order many years ago. The judge had not given any of them out that day yet; all denied. I came in with documents, recordings, and witness statements. He proceeded to "double down". Order granted. Of course, it only made things worse, so bad I had to leave town, that I honestly can't recommend it. However getting that company office transfer (he was harassing my workplace as well) ended up being the best thing that ever happened. I got the promotion of my dreams by being in the right place at the right time in front of the right people (regional director), which wouldn't have happened without that 1000mi relocation!
In court one of my brothers EX friends left a nasty note in our mail box. It was a he said she said case. When the EX friend got on the stand our lawyer said whit if I told you the mother had seen him put the letter in the mail box (she had not). The EX friend then said she could not have seen me put it in the mail box because I put it there really late at night! He admitted to doing it so it would not matter what my mother had said anymore.
14:05 that's a pheonix wright type trial. Hold it‼️ You say you never saw the knife yourself.... 💥⚡️ _THEN HOW WERE YOU ABLE TO DESCRIBE WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE?!_ ⚡️💥🫵
I once underpaid 3 of my 5 employees accidentally and they were decided in court to pay ME the amount I underpaid. I don't know how, I wasn't in the court, I only knew of it after and compensated them most of the money back.
12:31 I don’t think this is a win at all; it’s just deceptive BS. I’d think a reasonable person could interpret that as a question about the dog not being leashed at the time of the incident, without the loaded implication.
In case people are unaware, Officers who make DUI arrests get paid by Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the National Highway Training and Safety Administration.
I was thinking he was probably friends with the other dude in the fight, which is why he didn't get involved because he would have had to arrest them both. But then still wanted to help his buddy. But I wouldn't put it past any cop literally drinking on the job to do that for any kind of reason, even just for the hell of it.
I FUCKING KNEW IT. I always called Buffalo Wild Wings "BD3's" and nobody in my entire life believed me that anybody else called it that. I was honestly starting to think that I had some Mandela effect going on about the name and where I heard it from.
i wish i could give you an answer but when i asked at one point, to a waiter, they couldn't really give me an answer. so at this point i dunno why :/ i guess its up to speculation, but my reasoning (or thinking) is that there's 3 words in the name, hence BW3's.
Confidentiality is between clients and their attorneys. Exchanges and events elsewhere(such as court) are not covered. Also, there are some instances where you are okay if you do not identify a client by name.
Your generally fine if you keep identifiable information such as the name of client or case. Better though, Reddit let’s you basically be completely anonymous, so they would need to be able to prove that they broke confidentiality which is basically impossible.
As long as it stay anonymous, its okay. Moreover court records are accessible to the public. So anything that happen during court or any event in between that not require confidentiality from the party involved is not a break of confidentiality. Its like when you go to the dentist and your dentist recalling their past cases without mentioning any names, perfectly legal.
Fathers win in a few instances: - They are extremely smart and resourceful with a lot of evidence - The mother is just that awful - They get lucky on where their case is being held Or a mixture of each. But it's a well known fact that the court system is bias against fathers due to the laws being made when people still thought men were only worth what they could earn and women were only worth being homemakers. Laws are quick to be made but slow to be changed. Hoping your outcome was a positive one
@@cc_snipergirl my outcome was a positive one, thanks. My dad married a woman who he thought would be a great mom, but when she relapsed into her meth addiction we noped tf out.
Always take video/picture of aparent when you move in and out Also the fact it took the mom admitting she fed her kids cat food to give the dad custody is wild
I once got off a charge when a public defender had a got ya moment on the Chicago police. This was almost 20yrs ago, keep in mind NO ONE is the same person they were 20yrs ago, you just hope to be better. I'll start with a friend of mine that was killed infront of me when we were hanging out at a park playing Basketball when I was 20yrs old. It's a long horrible story on it's own but to keep it short, it left me traumatized with ZERO faith the police will keep me safe. Fast foward 2yrs and me and a friend are walking down the street near the neighborhood my late friend was killed, and im carrying my own gun. Of course I did have a permit, but I was set on not be victimized ever again. The Chicago police stopped us and immediately started frisking us even though we weren't causing problems or being loud or doing ANYTHING WRONG. However I knew I was busted anyway and didn't fight them or resist or try to run. Fast foward to my very first court date, and I'm infront of a public defender and he's asking me why I had the gun. I explained to him about my late friend and he just silently stared me in the eyes for a long moment. He then said ok, and walked away. Now im infront of the judge with the police officer that arrested me. It was a probable cause hearing (I don't know what they actually call it, but thats the best way to describe it) and the judge is going over the evidence with the PD and the cop. The cop wrote in his statement that he was sitting at a red light traveling north, as I was J walking going south and that's why he stopped me, and fun my gun. When it was my PD's turn to ask the cop about his evidence, it was glorious lol. He asked the cop, "so, if you were sitting at a red light traveling north, and he's traveling south...how could he be J walking when he had the walk signal? You violated his rights". The cop tried to say something about a call over a shooting that was literally over ten blocks away from where he saw me. Before the cop even stopped talking the judge said "no probable cause" and banged her gavel. The cop threw his hands in the air out of disbelief, but probable cause is a constitutional thing...sooo...lol. It happened so quickly, I had no idea what happened and thought I heard the judge wrong. So I asked the bailiff wtf just happened and he told me I beat the case. I let out a big "YEAH BOY!" And he quickly reminded me im not free until I'm processed out, and I stfu. Lol never been in trouble since dgaf if you dont believe me.
My apartments has attached garages on the opposite side of the building as our front door so in order to do anything with our vehicle we have to park in front of our single car garage because we have too much stuff and big dogs for our truck to fit inside the garage. I will park in front of it every now and then for an hour or 2, but because it's a fire lane my neighbors have called to have my truck towed 3 different times. Nobody comes and knocks on the door or tries to say anything and the first 2 times ok whatever yea I was parked out there a little long annoying but I get why they did it it's a fire lane and I was parked there for over an hour with my garage closed, but this last time it was only out there for 30 minutes with our garage open, but because it was only half way open they still towed it and it was only out there because I left to go to my doctors appointment but I had to get sick before I got out of the parking lot so I just parked in front of the garage so I could go get sick in the bathroom before I left. Was in the bathroom 30 minutes before I was ready to leave and truck is gone. We have always figured out how to come up with the money that day even though we are poor AF and can't even keep up with our bills but we have had to pay $561 every single time it's been towed even though it doesn't even sit in the lot for 24 hours. I hate people everyone is so fake.
Are you sure it's your neighbors and not a predatory towing service? Maybe you can get your return investment like these guys lol but also where do you live where there's a fire lane in front of your house? That seems like a really poor design
13:11 question should have really been worded in a fashion where at the end of the question it says something like "on the day your dog is being accused of biting my client". Cause if that case was not already an obvious case, then their is no way that question would hold up in court.
Subscribed just for the comment at 3:17. We're applying to new places, paying application fees, and it feels like an absolute scam (not to mention so many more problems)
Me not as a lawyer in small claims, I filed lawsuit against a guy who sold me a RV that was not suited for living. When I filed a lawsuit I turned in all my evidence made copies of evidence and mailed him the copy the moron, then proceeds to mail me the one piece of evidence I was missing the title, the guy thought he would send the title after the period in which the court would allow anybody to turn in evidence. The court date comes the judge says I’m only gonna reward you $300. I respectfully object I asked the judge can I turn in this title that was sent to me by the defendant the judge asks why I didn’t turn it in before I explain the con in which the defendant is trying to pull the judge then says OK Ivan look back at my complaint form in which the defendant submitted find in one of the paragraphs. The defendant says the title is clean. I pointed out to the judge. I said your honor if you would please look at page, blank sentence, blank. The defendant states, the title is clean, but according to state law a clean title, does not have the words salvage across it in red lettering, therefore the defendant perjured himself in front of this court. The judge immediately rewarded me $1800 plus court cost and as a FU to the defendant they put it on his credit for 12 years.
Most abusive parents know what they’re doing is wrong or at least will be seen as bad. The fact that the “mother” thought feeding a child cat food would be seen as a good thing makes me wonder what she doesn’t say to people
5:03 Now becaue technology improved so much you can state that the girl herself cut these together with help of ai,to get rid of him. If i would be the guys lawyer,i woulda said prove it to me,that it weren't cut together from his earlier voicemails. How would they ever prove that?
5:33 same thing happened with my uncle he was at a bar and he knew he couldn’t drive home so he open his front car door to unlock the backseat (he was going to sleep in the back and once he was sober drive home) and got a DUI because when he open the car he had his keys on him so now (he not drunk even that often) he puts his keys under his tire even puts a bit of snow dirt or pebble to make sure no one can find the key
That won't stop them from doing a he-said-she-said. They just have to say he had his key. But if he wants, he can attach a strong magnet to his key and stick it to the underside of the car. What he could really do though is just record himself walking to his car explaining his intent and keep recording until he's inside the car.
If I was the lawyer questioning the cop about the knife he could describe in such detail, I would have asked what happened to the knife. Where is it now? Is there an evidence lockup it was put into? Is there a paper trail? Are there photographs of the knife or body cam footage of my client wielding the knife? Stuff like that
Love to see landlords eat shit. My family went broke because our landlord sued us for "trashing the place..." and used it to buy the house a hot tub and repaint the entire thing. She evicted us to give the house to her daughter as a sweet sixteen. When my mom mentioned moving soon because we were struggling, she let us skip rent a couple times because "you're all just so sweet." Turned out, she wanted to make sure we didn't leave before she was ready to pull this stunt, and let us keep the house tidy until it was time.
Can anyone imagine if a BMW (Or all) had a bar in their dealerships and customers were signing papers of their newly purchased vehicle(s) and all the DUIs that would be coming out of all these dealerships alone!? LOL
13:18 that's just... scummy, like, what if the person is innocent? yeah you win but only because you asked a gotcha question they weren't prepared for, you don't really prove anything. Any lawyer asking that kind of question should have their license revoked frankly. There are people who go to prison over shit like that and it's not funny or cute.
Depends on your personality. Both need extreme attention to detail and good information parsing. Also both come with wildly different specialties you can get into, like different parts of law or the body. Lawyers do better if they have good people skills but can distance themselves from emotional situations. You cannot take anything personally. You need to be very quick-witted, well-spoken, and organized. You will be the master of paperwork and obtaining random obscure knowledge. Always learning. You'll be dealing with the public just like you do in a service industry job, except your job is to instruct them on legal matters. Also, you will be broke for a handful of years after graduating. Think Daredevil but without the superhero bits. Surgeons work with their hands, but also need to be good at communicating as well as being level-headed. You need to be kind and compassionate, as you aren't only interacting with patients when they are on your table. You should have good hand-eye coordination, be adaptable, and have high stamina as things can change in an instant and surgeries can take a long time. Surgeons need to be good leaders to be able to lead everyone on their team. Pressure is very high, as is the risk of hurting someone or being sued. But it can be very rewarding as you help people heal.
Guys check out our new channel, better stories on there. www.youtube.com/@ReallySparked
Gas Gas Gas AI Cover when?
Dedi Amkaming AI Cover when?
What is with the nauseating, headache and seizure inducing background?
Nice
I knew her story didnt up when she said she got a perm, then had a shower... which the cardinal rule of perm maintenance is that you're forbidden to wet your hair for at least 24 hours after getting a perm at the risk of deactivating the ammonium thioglycolate
Legally Blonde!
I knew the pool boy who claimed to be having an affair was lying when he confirmed that he had a boyfriend, but then tried to explain that he thought we meant his best friend, but his boyfriend, who was in the courtroom, got upset and told us that he was Gay and European.
😅😂
Great job Elle
I don't wash my hair every time I shower
In the last story, it sounds like the attorney came up with the idea of lying about the husband and pressured the wife to go along with it.
thats the vibe I got as well, otherwise she could have easily denied it and kept up with her lie with no way to prove she wrote the letter. That attorney is definitely going to lose their liscense and maybe even see some jail time and fines for that
Yeah "courts are biased against men to the point even the best father ever will lose custody to a mother who barely isn't negligent or abuses the kids, but let's just try to lose the case by discrediting the father with lies"...lol
@@charginginprogresss I mean, yes and no, you still have to discredit the father in the scenario you brought up for the court to rule in favor of the mother, it's just that the court is more likely to believe what the mother has to say when she claims to be a better fit for their children 🤔
“This is big problem, we ship crap to customer” LOL💀💀💀
💀 💀 💀
One time in high school, we were assigned into teams to debate a hypothetical scenario. The scenario was whether or not a hypothetical high school student should drop out of school and get a job as a waitress, and I was assigned to Team Yes.
My teammates and I managed to piece together a decent enough argument, but the leader of Team No really dropped the ball for his team.
The entire crux of his personal argument rested on this fictional high school student somehow *losing the ability to read and write* after dropping out.
Don't remember if a winner was ever declared, but he certainly didn't do his team any favors.
It's funny, that kid stayed in school, and yet it didn't teach him what would actually happen if he left
Losing the ability to read? XD They couldn't have just said it greatly limited her career growth options? That sounds like a really easy case to advise against dropping out, especially in our highly specialized economy where a highschool degree barely gets you a job at mcdonalds.
in high school, we had a debate about if Karl Marx should be put on trial because of bad events happened in countries attempting Communism, I was Marx, and we managed to confuse the other team and make them focus on a "communism bad" narrative for their arguments
No would be the easier argument and he still failed what
We had a high school debate once and I don't remember the actual question very well but one guy insisted to go first on behalf of his team as if he had this major breakthrough but his entire argument was "smart people should have more rights"
You had an opportunity. You could have taken the Ace Attorney "Hold it!" sound effect.
You had an opportunity, and you missed it.
I heard it in my head anyway
@@dankweaboo1105same
I got the opposite experience the "Oh shit we're fucked". It was a Medicaid case where we were fighting to get our client the device he needed. Our key witness was his doctor. She was doing great then all of a sudden she says that our client never tried any of the other devices she said he did in earlier documents, she was just using language the company selling the device told her to use. She never told me or my partner that. After that the rest of the case was pointless as she had to try other devices and dismiss them. Didn't matter that he still needed the device. Didn't matter that the other devices were just as expensive. We were fucked and we knew it.
Ah, so you had an experience from the "Why didn't you tell us that sooner?" variety of lawyer videos. Condolences.
That truck at 2:30 really just went, "Nah screw you buddy." XD
Would have been slightly cooler if you used the actual “Hold it!” line from the Ace Attorney games.
Who's tho? Some are more epic than others (looking at you gadot and klavier)
@@CafeLiquerstreams Phoenix Wright’s, of course.
That should have been the thumbnail and I am beyond disappointed
Nahh, OBJECTION! is better
I WAS SO DISAPPOINTED WHEN IT WASNT PHOENIX WRIGHT 😭😭😭😭
Divorce courts are extremely biased against men and many lawyers take advantage of that
Family courts also
Thats a myth.
@@hokyoseihow so
You mean religious courts?
@@derpygoatman for starters, there are no dedicated divorce courts, at least in most Asian countries
13:27 This is such a famously dumb way to lose that it's straight up a meme. I forget the wording that's usually used, but it's something like "What were you wearing on the night you strangled your girlfriend?" or similar. You would think that lawyers would be specifically taught about this one, since it's such a simple and obvious way to get tricked into saying 'yes' to something you'd otherwise never say yes to.
I thought questions like that were simply forbidden in an actual trial.
@@torgranael Not a lawyer, so I'm not _sure,_ but I _think_ there are some rules it would theoretically violate? Shit's complicated.
@@torgranaelI think it's a major case of leading the witness, which any attorney should be on top of.
@@torgranael The attorney can shout objection leading and the judge will say sustained and the witness will be able to ignore the question.
However, if the witness says "yes"
it doesnt matter what the attorney or the judge says anymore.
Its technically a scummy move but its still a self-own by the witness.
They are considered leading questions and are forbidden during direct examination but not cross examination
A favorite story that I read on this subject is the plaintiff was claiming permanent disability from an accident. He was suing his insurance company who disputed the permanence. The insurance company hired an investigator who got pictures of the plaintiff doing roof work on his house. Climbing up and down the ladder, lugging hefty tools, moving around on the roof, etc. His lawyer didn’t object to the photos being submitted as evidence and the guy looked super smug. His idiotic explanation was that as he was not a licensed contractor his work on the roof should not be counted as work. Yeah the judge wasn’t buying it.
Lawyer could just have said, "My client has good days and bad days. These must have been taken on one of the rare good days, but those are too unpredictable to hold down steady employment, and thus my client needs disability to pay the bills."
That's how most disabilities work.
okay that "admit" on the questionaire is stupid. like yeah its a "gotcha" question but... thats why you dont ever answer with yes or no, you answer with yes or no and a confirmation of the question.
so not "admit" but "I admit our dog was not leashed".
not even a law thing, just... in general, answer your questions like that.
100 questions on a dog bite. Like it was clearly a gotcha questionare.
My "Hold it" moment I knew I would win was in a murder case.
Long story short, my childhood friend had this girlfriend that was cheating on him, but she had taken a clock he made that looked like a statue to her trip overseas. When that statue came up in court, I pressed Y and shouted HOLD IT, then proceeded to dismantle the prosecutor's case piece by piece with all the evidence I had on the bottom screen!
i think you need to review the meaning of the word interesting and then tell the whole story lol
@@sinsley1 pretty sure TwilightWolf was referring to a video game ace Attorney lol
@@noheroheretryagain837 ah ok
The giveaway is the phrases “pressed Y” and “bottom screen.” You don’t need to press Y to do things in real life.
@@erickpoorbaugh6728 It's not the giveaway, it's the punchline.
If someone is ever so stupid in a lawsuit than I'll say "did you graduate from Phoenix Wright?"
At least Pheonix can prove his case. Yeah, it’s in weird and very… _unusual_ ways but he is a good attorney.
No they’re Country U alumni
12:21 yes, and so it happened, the friend lawyer did not notice until OP showed them the contract didnt have their signature and told them about that clause
I hereby summon all Ace Attorney fans who clicked because of the reference
I HAVE BEEN SUMMONED!
Damn you. XD
Here i am
Hello
Cinder Block
Yes this is a reference.
I have a story for this. One time, as a paralegal, we were in court regarding ownership of a house and representing the Plaintiff. During the cross-examination of the Plaintiff, I realized that I accidentally also included the deed and deed history of another property that our client owned, but was not related to the case, in the trial brief. When the Defendant was being cross-examined, she said that the reason she fully owned the property was because she traded her partial ownership of the other property, which she had never said before. I pulled the deed history of the other property, to keep up and realized she was never on the deed. I quickly signed my boss to come over and saw his eyes immediately light up when he saw the deed history. They settled pretty quickly in court after that
13:42 the question is sneaky, like as kids when someone would go "does your mom know you're gay" and whoever they asked says no without thinking about it
Missed opportunity to use ace attorney music.
It’s so funny when people admit awful things in court
Hey, don't ridicule people for making mistakes that ultimately lead to justice being served. You'll make them stop doing it!
9:32 that one really *cracked* me up
My mother had to go on disability years back. Various health issues. There was one doctor arguing against her getting it. My mothers attorney was able to prove not only that her arguments were false. But that this doctor never actually saw or was ever in the place to observe her at all. Literally talking out her ass based on nothing.
"X, what was a time that this happened to you?"
Without fail, every single fucking time - "Not X, buuuuut~!"
I mean, they're still relevant
True, but we still get an interesting and relevant story from it, so I'm not bothered
Without fail, every single time:
“Y: X, what was a time that this happened to you?
Not X, but-“
Like my guy we still get something out of it regardless and it’s still relevant, stop whining.
My dad’s custody case was sort of the opposite of a “Got You” thing and more like a nightmare for everybody that’s involved. He was poor because he was basically taking care of the big needs for my siblings by himself. She didn’t take them to dentists, doctors, or anything, and he needed to raise three kids by himself, so he had resorted to researching and representing himself in court. Luckily for him, she lied to her lawyers and constantly cycled them out so she wouldn’t need to pay any major fees. Every new guy that came in was ready with a “solid case” and the judge would immediately tell the lawyer “Your arguments have been given already. We are just here to talk about some custody concerns.” She was uncooperative, annoying and none of the kids liked her. As much as the courts wanted to keep the kids with their mother, my dad remarried within the time these custody battles were happening and it was apparent that it was best for the kids to go with my dad.
She wasn’t happy, but there wasn’t a single person in that court room that didn’t think Justice was served.
i have a cop friend who was handling a stabbing incident while questioning the stabber was asked: "Did you stab thee victim?" she answered yes the next question: "Did you commit the crime?" answer no I laughed about that for like 2 months
I got motion sickness from the game you were playing, so i guess im listening to these as a podcast from now on lol
It's called Clustertruck
Yeah, that was a bad choice of game to use, in my opinion.
We gonna talk about Buffalo wild wings having better cams for one place then all banks combined?
10:25 in video...the judge who used the pun on shells while saying "on any plans they may be hatching" placed an Easter egg in her ruling and hence a hidden pun among other puns!
Fighting for custody as a man without a lawyer is like trying to beat an NBA team with your friends who all have sprained ankles😭 you’re not winning unless it’s outright given to you by the opposition😂
Aye, but this time I challenged them all to a game of hockey.
This isn't a "HOLD IT" moment although they tried making it out like that. I once had to testify as a kid in a case, I was only 11 but I was smart. I used the phrase "out of harm's way" which I'd heard many times before on TV. As soon as I said it, the guy stopped me and asked me where I'd heard that phrase from and I mumbled something about a book, because I didn't want to admit that I'd heard it watching WWE.
There's gotta be a better way to censor than just replacing the words with "unalive" and "female dog"
There was “Minecraft”, but the FBI literally called that one out.
7:56 said $1800 but on screen it showed $800. But given that it was 3 * (2 * $300) it was obviously $1800, but it did throw me for a loop there for a second.
Needed to get a restraining order many years ago. The judge had not given any of them out that day yet; all denied. I came in with documents, recordings, and witness statements. He proceeded to "double down". Order granted. Of course, it only made things worse, so bad I had to leave town, that I honestly can't recommend it. However getting that company office transfer (he was harassing my workplace as well) ended up being the best thing that ever happened. I got the promotion of my dreams by being in the right place at the right time in front of the right people (regional director), which wouldn't have happened without that 1000mi relocation!
crazy how saying sorry was the real reason she needed to say sorry
In court one of my brothers EX friends left a nasty note in our mail box. It was a he said she said case. When the EX friend got on the stand our lawyer said whit if I told you the mother had seen him put the letter in the mail box (she had not). The EX friend then said she could not have seen me put it in the mail box because I put it there really late at night! He admitted to doing it so it would not matter what my mother had said anymore.
14:05 that's a pheonix wright type trial.
Hold it‼️
You say you never saw the knife yourself....
💥⚡️ _THEN HOW WERE YOU ABLE TO DESCRIBE WHAT IT LOOKED LIKE?!_ ⚡️💥🫵
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAT?!!!
It's kinda like the clock statue from the first trial.
9:35 Looks like they were walking on Eggshels
First guy pulled an updated autopsy report moment.
Story 12: every child deserves a parent but not every adult deserves to be a parent
I once underpaid 3 of my 5 employees accidentally and they were decided in court to pay ME the amount I underpaid. I don't know how, I wasn't in the court, I only knew of it after and compensated them most of the money back.
you need to work on your lies
I'm only halfway in and already three stories involving cops having me repeat my new mantra: "END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY NOW!"
Surf Wisely.
Loving that clustertruck. So unusual see such an obscure as background.
Ah that's what it was called, I remember that time my said he might get it all those years ago.
Honestly, all your vids make me feel safe and happy, dunno why... Keep doing you ❤
The beautiful ace attorney reference in the question.
Never thought I could get the experience of motion sickness from the comfort of my home, but here we are.
I wished you played the HOLD IT! sound effect
really goes to show that you just CAN NOT trust the cops, ever
Am I the only one who thought of ace attorney when I saw the thumbnail?
12:31 I don’t think this is a win at all; it’s just deceptive BS. I’d think a reasonable person could interpret that as a question about the dog not being leashed at the time of the incident, without the loaded implication.
missed opportunity to have objection funk play in the background
In case people are unaware, Officers who make DUI arrests get paid by Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the National Highway Training and Safety Administration.
I was thinking he was probably friends with the other dude in the fight, which is why he didn't get involved because he would have had to arrest them both. But then still wanted to help his buddy. But I wouldn't put it past any cop literally drinking on the job to do that for any kind of reason, even just for the hell of it.
random fun fact: bww or buffalo wild wings is also called bw3's where i live, they also have very good food.
in other words, have a good day :]
I FUCKING KNEW IT. I always called Buffalo Wild Wings "BD3's" and nobody in my entire life believed me that anybody else called it that. I was honestly starting to think that I had some Mandela effect going on about the name and where I heard it from.
I'm curious, what's the 3 for? Since there's only two Ws in the name
i wish i could give you an answer but when i asked at one point, to a waiter, they couldn't really give me an answer. so at this point i dunno why :/ i guess its up to speculation, but my reasoning (or thinking) is that there's 3 words in the name, hence BW3's.
@@IvoryAxolotlTwitch I guess it's another one of life's mysteries lol. Thanks anyway.
doesnt this break confidentiality or something
edit: thanks repliers this stuff is pretty cool and i'm glad y'all can share with me :)
Confidentiality is between clients and their attorneys. Exchanges and events elsewhere(such as court) are not covered. Also, there are some instances where you are okay if you do not identify a client by name.
As far as I am aware, court records are accessible to the public, therefore do not count for confidentiality.
Your generally fine if you keep identifiable information such as the name of client or case. Better though, Reddit let’s you basically be completely anonymous, so they would need to be able to prove that they broke confidentiality which is basically impossible.
As long as it stay anonymous, its okay. Moreover court records are accessible to the public. So anything that happen during court or any event in between that not require confidentiality from the party involved is not a break of confidentiality. Its like when you go to the dentist and your dentist recalling their past cases without mentioning any names, perfectly legal.
holy sh*t, that last one tho
Something funny
You said that boyfriends never win the child unrepresented, my dad did that exactly.
Fathers win in a few instances:
- They are extremely smart and resourceful with a lot of evidence
- The mother is just that awful
- They get lucky on where their case is being held
Or a mixture of each. But it's a well known fact that the court system is bias against fathers due to the laws being made when people still thought men were only worth what they could earn and women were only worth being homemakers. Laws are quick to be made but slow to be changed. Hoping your outcome was a positive one
@@cc_snipergirl my outcome was a positive one, thanks. My dad married a woman who he thought would be a great mom, but when she relapsed into her meth addiction we noped tf out.
Always take video/picture of aparent when you move in and out
Also the fact it took the mom admitting she fed her kids cat food to give the dad custody is wild
I once got off a charge when a public defender had a got ya moment on the Chicago police. This was almost 20yrs ago, keep in mind NO ONE is the same person they were 20yrs ago, you just hope to be better. I'll start with a friend of mine that was killed infront of me when we were hanging out at a park playing Basketball when I was 20yrs old. It's a long horrible story on it's own but to keep it short, it left me traumatized with ZERO faith the police will keep me safe. Fast foward 2yrs and me and a friend are walking down the street near the neighborhood my late friend was killed, and im carrying my own gun. Of course I did have a permit, but I was set on not be victimized ever again. The Chicago police stopped us and immediately started frisking us even though we weren't causing problems or being loud or doing ANYTHING WRONG. However I knew I was busted anyway and didn't fight them or resist or try to run. Fast foward to my very first court date, and I'm infront of a public defender and he's asking me why I had the gun. I explained to him about my late friend and he just silently stared me in the eyes for a long moment. He then said ok, and walked away. Now im infront of the judge with the police officer that arrested me. It was a probable cause hearing (I don't know what they actually call it, but thats the best way to describe it) and the judge is going over the evidence with the PD and the cop. The cop wrote in his statement that he was sitting at a red light traveling north, as I was J walking going south and that's why he stopped me, and fun my gun. When it was my PD's turn to ask the cop about his evidence, it was glorious lol. He asked the cop, "so, if you were sitting at a red light traveling north, and he's traveling south...how could he be J walking when he had the walk signal? You violated his rights". The cop tried to say something about a call over a shooting that was literally over ten blocks away from where he saw me. Before the cop even stopped talking the judge said "no probable cause" and banged her gavel. The cop threw his hands in the air out of disbelief, but probable cause is a constitutional thing...sooo...lol. It happened so quickly, I had no idea what happened and thought I heard the judge wrong. So I asked the bailiff wtf just happened and he told me I beat the case. I let out a big "YEAH BOY!" And he quickly reminded me im not free until I'm processed out, and I stfu. Lol never been in trouble since dgaf if you dont believe me.
My apartments has attached garages on the opposite side of the building as our front door so in order to do anything with our vehicle we have to park in front of our single car garage because we have too much stuff and big dogs for our truck to fit inside the garage. I will park in front of it every now and then for an hour or 2, but because it's a fire lane my neighbors have called to have my truck towed 3 different times. Nobody comes and knocks on the door or tries to say anything and the first 2 times ok whatever yea I was parked out there a little long annoying but I get why they did it it's a fire lane and I was parked there for over an hour with my garage closed, but this last time it was only out there for 30 minutes with our garage open, but because it was only half way open they still towed it and it was only out there because I left to go to my doctors appointment but I had to get sick before I got out of the parking lot so I just parked in front of the garage so I could go get sick in the bathroom before I left. Was in the bathroom 30 minutes before I was ready to leave and truck is gone. We have always figured out how to come up with the money that day even though we are poor AF and can't even keep up with our bills but we have had to pay $561 every single time it's been towed even though it doesn't even sit in the lot for 24 hours. I hate people everyone is so fake.
Are you sure it's your neighbors and not a predatory towing service? Maybe you can get your return investment like these guys lol but also where do you live where there's a fire lane in front of your house? That seems like a really poor design
Deja Vu, I've just been in this place before
Story 11 is my favourite XD
13:11 question should have really been worded in a fashion where at the end of the question it says something like "on the day your dog is being accused of biting my client". Cause if that case was not already an obvious case, then their is no way that question would hold up in court.
Subscribed just for the comment at 3:17. We're applying to new places, paying application fees, and it feels like an absolute scam (not to mention so many more problems)
"hold it" is when you press someone, that's when you haven't figured out the case and are pressing every statement
Me not as a lawyer in small claims, I filed lawsuit against a guy who sold me a RV that was not suited for living. When I filed a lawsuit I turned in all my evidence made copies of evidence and mailed him the copy the moron, then proceeds to mail me the one piece of evidence I was missing the title, the guy thought he would send the title after the period in which the court would allow anybody to turn in evidence. The court date comes the judge says I’m only gonna reward you $300. I respectfully object I asked the judge can I turn in this title that was sent to me by the defendant the judge asks why I didn’t turn it in before I explain the con in which the defendant is trying to pull the judge then says OK Ivan look back at my complaint form in which the defendant submitted find in one of the paragraphs. The defendant says the title is clean. I pointed out to the judge. I said your honor if you would please look at page, blank sentence, blank. The defendant states, the title is clean, but according to state law a clean title, does not have the words salvage across it in red lettering, therefore the defendant perjured himself in front of this court. The judge immediately rewarded me $1800 plus court cost and as a FU to the defendant they put it on his credit for 12 years.
That burned the house down thing is incredibly common
Gotta love how cops play favorites and bend the law to save their friends.
$1800 for a $300 investment? Can I get whatever advice that guy got? Cause that’s a good investment 😂
it’s bogus, unless every penny over the fees went to his attorney it’s fake
You get: funny pun
I get: a win
Most abusive parents know what they’re doing is wrong or at least will be seen as bad. The fact that the “mother” thought feeding a child cat food would be seen as a good thing makes me wonder what she doesn’t say to people
5:03 Now becaue technology improved so much you can state that the girl herself cut these together with help of ai,to get rid of him.
If i would be the guys lawyer,i woulda said prove it to me,that it weren't cut together from his earlier voicemails.
How would they ever prove that?
Undersparked: *uses the words "hold it" in the title*
Ace attorney fans: allow us to introduce ourselves
3:18 that’s pretty much all landlords
Not relevant to the subject of the video, but what is that lorry jumping thing going on in the background and where can I get it? It looks fun
CLUSTERTRUCK, made by Landfall, creators of Totally Accurate Battle Simulator and Battlegrounds
@@sniclops15 Thank you
@@sniclops15
So it was Landfall, no wonder the style was so similar.
5:33 same thing happened with my uncle he was at a bar and he knew he couldn’t drive home so he open his front car door to unlock the backseat (he was going to sleep in the back and once he was sober drive home) and got a DUI because when he open the car he had his keys on him so now (he not drunk even that often) he puts his keys under his tire even puts a bit of snow dirt or pebble to make sure no one can find the key
That won't stop them from doing a he-said-she-said. They just have to say he had his key. But if he wants, he can attach a strong magnet to his key and stick it to the underside of the car. What he could really do though is just record himself walking to his car explaining his intent and keep recording until he's inside the car.
Skip ad 0:36
If I was the lawyer questioning the cop about the knife he could describe in such detail, I would have asked what happened to the knife. Where is it now? Is there an evidence lockup it was put into? Is there a paper trail? Are there photographs of the knife or body cam footage of my client wielding the knife? Stuff like that
"od word"
sure it's not odd?
It's Odd to write Od.
17:00 Please tell me that the judge can use this case to get Sandy dis-barred
Maybe not disbarred but she could be reprimanded by the Bar
If it seems illegal, it probably is; never accept an unfair outcome unless you know it is legal.
Love to see landlords eat shit. My family went broke because our landlord sued us for "trashing the place..." and used it to buy the house a hot tub and repaint the entire thing. She evicted us to give the house to her daughter as a sweet sixteen. When my mom mentioned moving soon because we were struggling, she let us skip rent a couple times because "you're all just so sweet." Turned out, she wanted to make sure we didn't leave before she was ready to pull this stunt, and let us keep the house tidy until it was time.
0:37 least greedy landlord story
Those times where the thing you're most interested is "what game are you playing in this video?"
Seriously it looks fun.
ClusterTruck
What game is being played? It looks familiar
Clustertruck
OBJECTION!
When the prosecution pulled out the updated autopsy report
9:44 he clicked to mark where he did a second take but forgot to edit it out
he’s a horrible youtuber even tho he’s copying all of his content he can’t even edit properly LOL
Back in the future good movie
What game is that in the background? looks fun
Clustertruck, according to other comments
Can anyone imagine if a BMW (Or all) had a bar in their dealerships and customers were signing papers of their newly purchased vehicle(s) and all the DUIs that would be coming out of all these dealerships alone!? LOL
My failed hold it moment was when I dropped my infant son
Hope hes okay
Have absolutely never heard ANYBODY refer to Buffalo wild wings as bww
*Insert Phoenix Wright Ace Attorney Pursuit - Cornered here*
13:18 that's just... scummy, like, what if the person is innocent? yeah you win but only because you asked a gotcha question they weren't prepared for, you don't really prove anything. Any lawyer asking that kind of question should have their license revoked frankly. There are people who go to prison over shit like that and it's not funny or cute.
Would be nice to have link to reddit for the topic where the answers were stolen
All landlords exploit people who rent from them. Some are just more greedy than the rest.
please put the name of the game used for the gameplay in the description.
Eat your heart out Phoenix Wright
I should just try to be a lawyer. . . Hold on worst place to go for future advice but which one would be a better job. Lawyer or Surgeon?
Depends on your personality. Both need extreme attention to detail and good information parsing. Also both come with wildly different specialties you can get into, like different parts of law or the body.
Lawyers do better if they have good people skills but can distance themselves from emotional situations. You cannot take anything personally. You need to be very quick-witted, well-spoken, and organized. You will be the master of paperwork and obtaining random obscure knowledge. Always learning. You'll be dealing with the public just like you do in a service industry job, except your job is to instruct them on legal matters. Also, you will be broke for a handful of years after graduating. Think Daredevil but without the superhero bits.
Surgeons work with their hands, but also need to be good at communicating as well as being level-headed. You need to be kind and compassionate, as you aren't only interacting with patients when they are on your table. You should have good hand-eye coordination, be adaptable, and have high stamina as things can change in an instant and surgeries can take a long time. Surgeons need to be good leaders to be able to lead everyone on their team. Pressure is very high, as is the risk of hurting someone or being sued. But it can be very rewarding as you help people heal.
@@cc_snipergirl what if I can do. . . All of that?
@@SomeoneNotYoulol It's not really about what you can do then. What do you want to do?
BWW is such a good restaurant🤩