This montage is SO WONDERFUL. Michelle Monahan is the real deal, from America's Heartland, not having lost her innocence, no matter the topic. It's like a hyperian spring, always flowing cool delicious water, here experiences and nonjudgmental reactions to her many experiences. "Is this Heaven? No, it's Iowa."
This guy's brain is wired at the speed of light. I hadn't even processed that the she'd said - "...but, I can pretend my a** off" when... - "Don't do that! Pretend something else!"
well ofc the IDF barbies tries to invite other celebs to visit israel... but old fergie is still irish enough to be professionally cynical of israel even in this short bit. good on him!
I don’t think he is tainted by Qatar media via Aljazeera , and groomed CNN, and BBC reporters. You should go and visit the west bank, which is Judea and Sumaria according to the bible and the Jews.
You feel sorry? For people who must not watch as much television and movies as you do? I feel for you. These actors were very minor actors in their time and now long forgotten. Like you and I.
I’m not sure how the recent conflict that “began” with Hamas’ attack and all that encompasses these present and recent events makes his joke about his show, which can be described as having content that pushes the boundaries of modern normative standards of “western” or American society …that its operation occurring in a place people refer to as the “holy land” …that might be a recipe for some conflict there. I guess I can’t say with knowledge from experience about these places, but surely it is not a stretch of imagination to think that perhaps the the moral zeitgeist of modern America exists in such a way that this type of boundary pushing media…which goes farther than American standards even allow…that placing its operations within Israel or any other regional state would in fact cause problems because of irreconcilable differences between cultural morality belief structures. Please explain how what he said offends you. Also, about the present conflict going back 1400 years…despite there being an unbroken interconnection between the people and events across time that connects then with now…I don’t think framing present circumstances as having a foundation based on things that happened something so far outside present lived experiences. There surely is a connection but hamas did not attack Israel civilians in modern times because of someone named Mohammed failed to convince the Jews to follow him. The “start” of conflict that you cite did not exist in a vacuum and events that transpired prior to this event cited surely can be just as similarly framed as the beginning of that event epoch. And while both statements are technically true, at least insofar as they do share connection across time, neither has much relevance or bearing on the organization of society today. You could just go back forever until time began citing every event that precedes another as the basis for all events extending through all time even far into the future. It probably isn’t helpful either to frame present times and events from what essentially is a biblical timeframe for understanding things today. If you have the belief indoctrinated into you that is what is important in the world today…it seems like it would be difficult to ever step outside the cyclical or historical continuing narration of transgressions that presently act to perpetuate conflict between disparate groups of people. Maybe Mohammed was not supposed to convince the Jews to follow him…which that idea might run contrary to longstanding religious beliefs and worldview of individuals that engage in religious activities. In any case nobody of a rational mind is incensed to find motivation for actions that occurred beyond the scope of their own lived experience. Like nobody is trying to get retribution for Jesus being killed…or at least any sane person would not. The same is true about any historical character regardless of the locus of their existence in society… To frame present circumstances as having an intrinsic or direct relation to things so far removed in time also denigrates or is indifferent to all of the other events and people that lived and occurred between then and now. Each discreet or “separate” event across all of those lives lived within the conflicted groups is more accurately cited as the reason for the present circumstances. Even if I were to defer to this claim about 1400 years ago as being true…I think that the social systems or apparatuses that has led a person to reference a dispute between two groups that goes back so far…is at least a facilitating agent or mechanism that would allow such an enduring embrace of hate to exist for so long…that it is the belief system of certain religious groups that is the real agent acting to perpetuate something 1400 years ago…like the fact that you want to talk about Mohammed in reference to the present day events I say is the real problem. Perhaps a belief in which so many people are inspired to commit violence and hold hatred in their hearts over such timescales…maybe such beliefs…about god…might not be anything more than a tradition of belief system which has nothing beyond what humanity has created and sustained in those stories. For to me…to speak of god in really any way or context like you could possibly know or anyone either alive dead or yet to come to be could ever know…is pretentious and arrogant on such an existential level. To think you know or anyone knows about god and that what you believe about god is only what you believe because you have been told that by someone, who was similarly told all the way back to whatever events happened as far back as these stories go…is ignorance and the opposite of enlightenment. It is sacrificing your own agency to transact it for the feeling of comfort or security that comes with knowing of things…of anything of all things. In this case to know things that are ultimately unknowable to us…and the discomfort of that irreconcilable state of ignorance which is not knowing something…is so great…that it is predominately preferable for what is apparently a super majority of all individuals…to prefer the comfort of the stories we have about god, because it is not a pleasant position to not understand the fullest account of one’s own existence.
To some, the art of tattoos have sentimental significance, where the pain is insignificant in comparison to that person's loss. To others, perhaps a rite of passage has occurred culturally, and the pain is a requirement in the completion of said right. For many others, the skill of the artist may hold admirational value, the colors used, and even the art itself may have special meaning. In ALL CASES, people who get tattoos share a kinship, or an understanding. An accepted level of mental/physical/spiritual and emotional discipline has to be achieved in order to ascend to a new chapter in one's life. This kind of discipline is not for the weak. People who have tatts are often looked upon as strange or troubled. Nothing could be further from the truth. Watch what happens when you politely ask someone what theirs means. Each and every has a unique story. Anyway, I hope this helps a little.
To most I think it's just a social fad they need to feel like they belong and for some to show how brave they were to get them. Walking billboards for artists who hope to keep selling to others.
Some are beautiful on women, and some are battle awards for men. The rest to me is just a fad. A trend that shows the parrots people can be. Like the word literally among the braindead. Their most often used word to describe something that they want you to believe that's not really interesting or unbelievable in the first place.
![The Late Late Show w/ Craig Ferguson! [Part 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/DBTsbFoLtgo/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Late Late Show w/ Craig Ferguson! [Part 2]](/img/tr.png)
This montage is SO WONDERFUL. Michelle Monahan is the real deal, from America's Heartland, not having lost her innocence, no matter the topic. It's like a hyperian spring, always flowing cool delicious water, here experiences and nonjudgmental reactions to her many experiences. "Is this Heaven? No, it's Iowa."
Indeed, charming burble, charming woman.
She is absolute dream! Such a classy and unpredictably charming!
Michelle Monaghan is soooo beautiful and adorable!
Amazing personality & her laugh is contagious!
Have a big crush on Alona for years
I don't know who that Red-Top-Bicycle-Tattoo girl is, but her laughter and sense of humor is so captivating!
Edit: Melissa Benoist
later on... Supergirl
Alona Tal starts at 2:36
You improved the internet.
And they cut the ending where she throws the Frisbee, if u want to see the whole clip, search ' Jay leno fly ' Alona Tal
The dress was nothing special
Alona is gorgeous
Aisha is gorgeous
Michelle Monaghan is just adorable
I think he was the best talk show host, l wish there were more shows to watch .
The girl with the red top and black skirt is adorable….
She was great as Supergirl:
ruclips.net/video/7dc46DPEymA/видео.htmlsi=sUVlGyfpr07TgLCO&t=106
How old she is?!
@@freebee9172
36 years old now .. she was on Glee 2012 - 2014
Craig stopped doing his show 2014 _(so maybe 26 here)_
10:05 is during her. Wish she'd bicycle ride for us in that skirt!
My first 2 French teachers were from Normandy & Paris. When the school hired a third French from Canada my old French teachers were disgusted.
Tell your old french teacher the french canadians savez their butts in WWII. Show some respect. 😉
-That would be a lot for a guy to deal with!
-Craig....In the eighties.
Wahaha was lmao! 🤣🤣
He's always so damn quick and witty.
Alona Is a badass.
Alona Tal starts at 2:36
Craig was awesome
27:24
Jenna Coleman - most beautiful on this planet (and all other planets as well) EVER ❤❤
No sixty year old man would not want to be with Raquel Welch.
Michelle Monaghan is just lovely
Yes, she is.
First guest was just enjoying whatever Craig was saying 😂
Who's the lady on 00:28:34
Edit: She looks phenomenal
Jenna Coleman
This guy's brain is wired at the speed of light. I hadn't even processed that the she'd said
- "...but, I can pretend my a** off" when...
- "Don't do that! Pretend something else!"
Aloha Tao what is amazing as Jo Beth in the sitcom supernatural. Finding out she served in the Israeli Armed Forces stun me though
31:12 "Dr. Hugh" Brilliant ⭐
who's the one who did a half strip at 14:46?
Her name is Dana DeLorenzo. She played the role of "Beth, the CBS Executive" in multiple episodes.
@@tomahost thanks! oh she played kelly maxwell on ash vs evil dead, that was a fun show!
@@alveolate That is another great show!
Who is 39:00 ?
Look at the originals.
Search:
Michelle Monaghan - Very Adorable & Fun Girl - 8/8 Visits In Ch. Order
Aisha Tyler not saying "phrasing" when craig said "mouth organ" is a great disappointment.
The picture of Craig on the phone is annoying, otherwise well Done.
well ofc the IDF barbies tries to invite other celebs to visit israel... but old fergie is still irish enough to be professionally cynical of israel even in this short bit. good on him!
Scottish
He is Scottish born not Irish, so not poisoned that much.
I don’t think he is tainted by Qatar media via Aljazeera , and groomed CNN, and BBC reporters. You should go and visit the west bank, which is Judea and Sumaria according to the bible and the Jews.
The fuck?
Wah, wah, 😭
Filey is on the exact opposite side of the UK to Blackpool.
Rachel Welch had to be the most beautiful woman ever geeeeeeeez
after Sophia Loren
I feel sorry for people who watch this in the distant future and have no idea who the guests are.
You feel sorry? For people who must not watch as much television and movies as you do? I feel for you. These actors were very minor actors in their time and now long forgotten. Like you and I.
@@mikeyoung9810 I sense an overwhelming level of chronic depression.
The girl from Glee has the most infectious laugh…but she’s too young for Craig to flirt with so he doesn’t know what talk about.
So where is Alona Tal?
She starts @2:40 ( pink dress)
Anyone know who is the chic in the red top @9:05 ?
@@TheXanthoman Melissa Benoist
5:23 2024 this didn't age well ..
Why. The whole reason he’s talking about it is because everybody know the conflict has been brewing and active there for decades now
@@victorvolobuev507 ~140 decades
@@ef2718 140 decades? How so?
@@victorvolobuev507 Ever since Mohamad failed to convince Jews to adopt him as a leader.
I’m not sure how the recent conflict that “began” with Hamas’ attack and all that encompasses these present and recent events makes his joke about his show, which can be described as having content that pushes the boundaries of modern normative standards of “western” or American society …that its operation occurring in a place people refer to as the “holy land” …that might be a recipe for some conflict there. I guess I can’t say with knowledge from experience about these places, but surely it is not a stretch of imagination to think that perhaps the the moral zeitgeist of modern America exists in such a way that this type of boundary pushing media…which goes farther than American standards even allow…that placing its operations within Israel or any other regional state would in fact cause problems because of irreconcilable differences between cultural morality belief structures.
Please explain how what he said offends you.
Also, about the present conflict going back 1400 years…despite there being an unbroken interconnection between the people and events across time that connects then with now…I don’t think framing present circumstances as having a foundation based on things that happened something so far outside present lived experiences.
There surely is a connection but hamas did not attack Israel civilians in modern times because of someone named Mohammed failed to convince the Jews to follow him. The “start” of conflict that you cite did not exist in a vacuum and events that transpired prior to this event cited surely can be just as similarly framed as the beginning of that event epoch. And while both statements are technically true, at least insofar as they do share connection across time, neither has much relevance or bearing on the organization of society today. You could just go back forever until time began citing every event that precedes another as the basis for all events extending through all time even far into the future.
It probably isn’t helpful either to frame present times and events from what essentially is a biblical timeframe for understanding things today. If you have the belief indoctrinated into you that is what is important in the world today…it seems like it would be difficult to ever step outside the cyclical or historical continuing narration of transgressions that presently act to perpetuate conflict between disparate groups of people.
Maybe Mohammed was not supposed to convince the Jews to follow him…which that idea might run contrary to longstanding religious beliefs and worldview of individuals that engage in religious activities. In any case nobody of a rational mind is incensed to find motivation for actions that occurred beyond the scope of their own lived experience. Like nobody is trying to get retribution for Jesus being killed…or at least any sane person would not. The same is true about any historical character regardless of the locus of their existence in society…
To frame present circumstances as having an intrinsic or direct relation to things so far removed in time also denigrates or is indifferent to all of the other events and people that lived and occurred between then and now. Each discreet or “separate” event across all of those lives lived within the conflicted groups is more accurately cited as the reason for the present circumstances.
Even if I were to defer to this claim about 1400 years ago as being true…I think that the social systems or apparatuses that has led a person to reference a dispute between two groups that goes back so far…is at least a facilitating agent or mechanism that would allow such an enduring embrace of hate to exist for so long…that it is the belief system of certain religious groups that is the real agent acting to perpetuate something 1400 years ago…like the fact that you want to talk about Mohammed in reference to the present day events I say is the real problem. Perhaps a belief in which so many people are inspired to commit violence and hold hatred in their hearts over such timescales…maybe such beliefs…about god…might not be anything more than a tradition of belief system which has nothing beyond what humanity has created and sustained in those stories. For to me…to speak of god in really any way or context like you could possibly know or anyone either alive dead or yet to come to be could ever know…is pretentious and arrogant on such an existential level. To think you know or anyone knows about god and that what you believe about god is only what you believe because you have been told that by someone, who was similarly told all the way back to whatever events happened as far back as these stories go…is ignorance and the opposite of enlightenment.
It is sacrificing your own agency to transact it for the feeling of comfort or security that comes with knowing of things…of anything of all things. In this case to know things that are ultimately unknowable to us…and the discomfort of that irreconcilable state of ignorance which is not knowing something…is so great…that it is predominately preferable for what is apparently a super majority of all individuals…to prefer the comfort of the stories we have about god, because it is not a pleasant position to not understand the fullest account of one’s own existence.
I will date woman with tattoos!!!
I can't understand why some people get tattoos. Its so painful and expensive. Weird
To some, the art of tattoos have sentimental significance, where the pain is insignificant in comparison to that person's loss. To others, perhaps a rite of passage has occurred culturally, and the pain is a requirement in the completion of said right. For many others, the skill of the artist may hold admirational value, the colors used, and even the art itself may have special meaning. In ALL CASES, people who get tattoos share a kinship, or an understanding. An accepted level of mental/physical/spiritual and emotional discipline has to be achieved in order to ascend to a new chapter in one's life. This kind of discipline is not for the weak. People who have tatts are often looked upon as strange or troubled. Nothing could be further from the truth. Watch what happens when you politely ask someone what theirs means. Each and every has a unique story. Anyway, I hope this helps a little.
To most I think it's just a social fad they need to feel like they belong and for some to show how brave they were to get them. Walking billboards for artists who hope to keep selling to others.
Not really
well i use tattoo to hide the scar on my skin
Grow a pair pan isn't that bad.
..."Have you seen a Dingus in your time?" is what he actually asked.
You left out the best parts, when they walk out in their tight dresses showing off those incredibly tight peaches and long toned legs.
Tattoos aren't pretty. They call it body art but it's more like a scar from a bad accident
That is your opinion. It is not shared by everyone.
Some are beautiful on women, and some are battle awards for men. The rest to me is just a fad. A trend that shows the parrots people can be. Like the word literally among the braindead. Their most often used word to describe something that they want you to believe that's not really interesting or unbelievable in the first place.
to me, it depends on the tattoo(s), their quality and the person
Body grafitti,
0:47 she come from somewhere hot = hell