Road to PRS - Load Development Part 2 - Determining Powder Charge and Seating Depth

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 18 окт 2024
  • #NotaProShooter
    From F-class to PRS, the same methods of load development work. A shallow dive into the world of the Audette OCW ladder.
    Visit us on Patreon: / winninginthewind

Комментарии • 125

  • @AndrewTempleton
    @AndrewTempleton Год назад +22

    Would definitely love to see your version of load development for 100 yards, really enjoy your takes on loading throughout your videos. Keep them coming!

  • @sergeantdwz5783
    @sergeantdwz5783 Год назад +41

    Id love to see a 10-20 minute videos of it at 100 yards

    • @bsracer85
      @bsracer85 Год назад

      Yes. I have 100 yards available and 500 yards is only at a club that is full right now

    • @bitogre
      @bitogre Год назад

      I want to see this as well as my closest range that exceeds 100yards is too far away (it has a max of 500yards).

    • @cooperbybee5211
      @cooperbybee5211 Год назад

      Same!

  • @EagleEyeShooting
    @EagleEyeShooting Год назад +18

    Though accuracy is linear, I tend to focus on load development at around 700 yards. Using a 1/2 MOA plate. Majority of PRS points are gathered at 350-700 yards. I believe it's crucial to know your rifles tendencies and spend the time learning what your load does at these distances. Often, loads develop that shoot extremely well at 100 yards, fall apart at distance. Is it BC deviation?. From your F Class expirence, I would be honored to hear your expirence pertaining to this

    • @RealBartBeasley
      @RealBartBeasley Год назад +3

      Agreed here Eagle Eye. True'ing ballistics is critical for PRS. I spend more time validating/true'ing (vertical POI) than I do "developing" a load. The 6mm variants are very forgiving as it relates PRS accuracy expectations (1/2 MOA and < 20 FPS ES). If you have high confidence in your vertical ballistic, then miss is a wind adjustment, effectively removing a (horizontal) dimension I need to think about while shooting a stage. True'ing: 1. verify zero at 100; 2. True velocity at 500; 3. True BC at 1000 (or something 800+). If you can get those three points confirmed, all the dots on the curve between 100 and 1000 will spot on elevation wise.

  • @AlphaIncog
    @AlphaIncog Год назад +4

    Keith, I’d like to see it done at 100 but really enjoyed this testing at 600 as it’s easier to see the vertical dispersion. Great video!!

  • @lk9456
    @lk9456 Год назад +1

    Any video that shows ways to do things differently is good, even if the concept is the same everyone will have a way to do theirs slightly different and you have more than enough merit to be worth a watch

  • @downandout6670
    @downandout6670 Год назад +9

    Would like to see load development at 100. It’s harder to find anything beyond that around here.

  • @DarthLepard
    @DarthLepard Год назад +3

    So I have been shooting PRS for about a year now and I can tell you most people are really slowing our bullets down. I have not really seen anyone running above 2900 on Dasher, most of us are at 2800-2850 for better spotting fo trace and impacts with less recoil. I find it interesting you are running your Dasher so fast and look forward to seeing you shooting a few matches and providing feedback afterwards. Appreciate what you don on your channel.

  • @inky8123
    @inky8123 Год назад +1

    Great video! As usual. Load development at 100 would be a great comparison to this video.

  • @aaronarcher2356
    @aaronarcher2356 Год назад

    I would like to see the difference between 100 and 600. I love your videos, straight shooting in everything you show us. Just the truth.

  • @RimfireAddicted70
    @RimfireAddicted70 Год назад

    This channel is a gold mine for information and when used as a learning tool will help you from wasting time and money in your progression.

  • @cfranklin7450
    @cfranklin7450 Год назад +1

    Any content from you is good content I'll watch it all.

  • @natinnh1
    @natinnh1 Год назад

    I'll take all you have to offer Keith - Thanks for sharing your procedures -

  • @franzk.ronellenfitsch795
    @franzk.ronellenfitsch795 Год назад +1

    Thank you for guiding through your develpment process. Another video on 100 yrds would be interesting, because it comes closer to what I usually can do in Germany, where I'm forced to 100 m, where longer ranges are a bit rare. What I found in optimising my 6.5 CM loads was, that at a certain point the 100 m range will not reveal any difference, especially when targeting the seating depth, so I went up to 300 m for testing and came back with some solid results.

  • @gregoryjackson6166
    @gregoryjackson6166 Год назад

    Outstanding series on Road to PRS! I found the information very interesting, although I am still relatively new to load development, I've learned a World Book Enclopedia set of information! I've just found the right node for my rifle, RPR in 6.5 creedmoor using Berger 144gn LRHT bullets over H-4350, 41.6; in Lapua brass. Thank you for sharing your knowledge.
    G. Action Jackson, MPA
    MSGT/USMC, Ret.

  • @fencingcoach3w
    @fencingcoach3w Год назад

    100Y, yes please. Our club, here in the UK, has ranges out to 600Ys. But, as we only have use of the ranges for a couple of hours per week all but the 100Y range are reserved for competition use during the season. Thank you for all the great content... Peter

  • @davidunderwood3605
    @davidunderwood3605 Год назад +2

    Nice going. And yes 100 yard load development would be great if not inconvenience to your normal routine. 100 yards is normal range for around many here without travel to far far away.

  • @lukas-ik7qe
    @lukas-ik7qe Год назад +3

    Hi there, load development at 100 yards in detail would be awesome! Thanks in advance!

  • @timdixon4883
    @timdixon4883 Год назад +4

    Yes please for the 100 yard video for load development . Thank you

  • @lyndonfisher1974
    @lyndonfisher1974 Год назад +1

    Yes, would LOVE a 100 yard series. You have talked before at starting at 100, then 300, 600, 1000........because things change.......but..is shooting at 100 and then moving up, the same procedure and conclusion as 100 yards and perfecting Accuracy and Precision ?....

  • @Pilottoproperties
    @Pilottoproperties Год назад

    Yes please would love to see the 100 yard development

  • @DadWil
    @DadWil Год назад +1

    Thanks ... I'm looking forward to your review of the Eagle Eye ammo...

  • @judodavid1
    @judodavid1 Год назад +1

    Thank you for the knowledge

  • @misterlewgee8874
    @misterlewgee8874 Год назад +1

    Love your stuff Keith..
    Thank you .

  • @rothgyr4360
    @rothgyr4360 Год назад

    I'd love to see your data from 100 yds, especially when compared with 600. Glad to see you dipping into PRS!

  • @robertbrewer2055
    @robertbrewer2055 Год назад

    Yes the 100yd testing would be great to see. I'm not a good enough shooter to do my load work up at 600yd.
    It's also more opportunity to see how you interpret the groups. I think I've made good choices with the load development I've done so far, but I'm always curious if I missed something or put too much weight on others. Thank you for the great content.

  • @andriesgrove8651
    @andriesgrove8651 Год назад

    100 meter load development - YES PLEASE Show us the way

  • @dennissawyer8496
    @dennissawyer8496 Год назад

    Im particularly interested in this series of videos as im just breaking in a new dasher. 👍🏼

  • @AlexSwan
    @AlexSwan 8 месяцев назад

    I'd be interested in seeing more detail on how to find the right powder charge prior to playing with seating depth. Is it really just a matter of going as close as possible to max pressure?

  • @dabbidefault
    @dabbidefault Год назад

    I would really much like to see the 100 yard load dev and a more detail in the seating depth testing, also elaborate more on how to choose where you want to be in the powder node

  • @joshjackson8266
    @joshjackson8266 9 месяцев назад

    Would like to see the 100 yard load developement. Cheers & merry christmas!

  • @sakischergkeletzis5494
    @sakischergkeletzis5494 Год назад

    It would be great to see a video like this!

  • @johanloock9690
    @johanloock9690 Год назад

    Thanks Keith. Yes please.

  • @ramonocampo6921
    @ramonocampo6921 Год назад +1

    Yes please and thank you

  • @H.R.6688
    @H.R.6688 Год назад

    I'd like to see the 100 yard development. Honestly, anything you make or do is cool with me.

  • @CaptainCreampie69
    @CaptainCreampie69 Год назад +3

    I would love to see how you would load for for “normal” guns like an AR10/AR15 in things like 6.5 creedmoor, 308 Winchester, 300 Blackout and 223 Remington at 100 yards as it is what I shoot a ton. Would love to hear what you think about progressive machines too like the Dillon Xl750 or the RL1100 as that is what I use. I have been reloading now for 4 years and am now getting curious about the accuracy side of it while still pumping out volume. Thanks for the content!

  • @kihara4244
    @kihara4244 Год назад +3

    It would be great if you can do 100m load dev video....I only have 100m and 200m range available which makes ladder testing "impossible"

  • @wm.traynor1143
    @wm.traynor1143 Год назад

    FWIW, I did "load development" at 1000 yards and called it quits, when I shot Full-bore.
    Pig hunting rifles were tested at 100 yards, which was about a maximum range.

  • @CacheCropp
    @CacheCropp 5 месяцев назад

    I appreciate your insight and videos. I would appreciate a deeper dive into the whole statistical sample size/confidence interval for load development. Besides simply increasing our sample sizes to 10-20, can we confidently say there are seating depth nodes and velocity nodes?

  • @francoisdavel1786
    @francoisdavel1786 Год назад

    I would love to see the 100m process. I agree it will be entertaining.

  • @clausziegler5720
    @clausziegler5720 Год назад

    100yard load development would be great, because that is the range which is easily accessible for me.

  • @austincoxhead4828
    @austincoxhead4828 Год назад

    Love to see a 100 yard load development

  • @brennancusick2390
    @brennancusick2390 Год назад

    I would like to see 100 yard load development as well.

  • @OFFTHEBEATENPATH1977
    @OFFTHEBEATENPATH1977 Год назад

    Would love to see load development at 100 yards. Also would love to hear your comments about when you’re doing the load development on the new barrel. I.e. how many rounds do you shoot through the barrel before starting load development?

  • @joethearcticfox
    @joethearcticfox Год назад

    I learn more when I watch people do things that I don't, so I say carry on at 600 yards.

  • @hispeedbullet2661
    @hispeedbullet2661 Год назад +2

    I’m interested in load development at 100 yards. Thanks!

  • @jeffreybossingham1732
    @jeffreybossingham1732 Год назад

    love you channel thank you

  • @rickroberts2182
    @rickroberts2182 Год назад

    Definitely interested in your 100 yard load development methodology. What type of external trigger are you using with the LabRadar @ the 2:30-2:40 timeframe??

  • @sautoter411
    @sautoter411 Год назад +2

    100 yds please, very imformative vids

  • @shootloadrepeat
    @shootloadrepeat 2 месяца назад

    What are your thoughts on fire forming new brass and changing your recipe to shoot out of fired vs unaired brass? Is there a big difference?

  • @SnapD24
    @SnapD24 Год назад +2

    I'm interested to see the differences. I thought it would be the same process though.

  • @jesperdegn
    @jesperdegn 11 месяцев назад

    Hello, I really like the way you approch the "best load" on PRS.
    How do you decide the bullet seating depth on the initial test (in Germany the saying goes: to be precise start off with 0.1mm back from the lands, and then go on for seating depth with the best load).
    What is your choise?
    Also I see 8 shots on each testing roung (you made 5 rounds with different loads?). You mention the loads 32.0 - 32.2 - 32.4 - 32.6 - 32.8 and 33.0 (which make 6 ). How does that fit tiogether? Or better What was in the load #1, #2 - #8? Or do I misinterpret that?
    Best regards, Jesper

  • @trigerfingers1911
    @trigerfingers1911 Год назад +1

    Agree… load development at 100 would be good to see, since that it all I have available.

  • @rdsii64
    @rdsii64 Год назад

    Considering I can only get to a 100 yard range on anything close to a regular basis, I would love to see a video on load development done at 100 yards.

  • @areynolds35
    @areynolds35 6 месяцев назад

    Love your videos! What software and hardware, assuming it is more than just software, do you use that allows you to show your plotted points of impact?

  • @emoryzakin2576
    @emoryzakin2576 Год назад

    I'd personally love to see 100 yard load development

  • @peterbriggs3408
    @peterbriggs3408 Год назад

    Would also like to see your take on the videos from hornady saying that you.only.really.get to see group sizes for significantly higher shot counts - would love you to compare your seating group tests for 5 rounds and 20 rounds to see if they make sense

  • @jonathanhutchings81
    @jonathanhutchings81 Год назад

    Would love to see 100 yard development

  • @RabbitSlayer48
    @RabbitSlayer48 Год назад

    Yes i would like to see load development at 100 and i would also like to see it for more of a varnint gun. A 204 ruger, 20 practical, 22 creed, or similar. Everything is prs, elr, f class, or benchrest on RUclips.

  • @Krzysztof_Ocalewski
    @Krzysztof_Ocalewski Год назад

    It would be awesome if you make video about load development on 100 yards :)

  • @toddb930
    @toddb930 Год назад

    Another vote for load development at 100 yards. When you do seating depth testing were you making 0.006" steps?

  • @JJ-tf2qs
    @JJ-tf2qs 11 месяцев назад

    Hey Keith, maybe I missed it and some of your videos are maybe even this video. When you do the powder charge test do you shoot one shot from each powder charge round robin style aiming at the same spot? Also I am shooting burger VLD hunting bullets. Would you start 15 in the lands while doing the powder charge test with these bullets? Thanks for your knowledge

    • @winninginthewind
      @winninginthewind  11 месяцев назад

      I typically run VLDs 10 into the lands. Yes, at 600 yards, I do a round robin of powder charges and see where they land reference each other, but I do the entire series at least 3 times to see if the result is consistent from one series to the next.

  • @isaacctll
    @isaacctll Год назад

    Do the 100 yard development!!!

  • @ruffen1365
    @ruffen1365 Год назад

    I would back down to 850ms max. Low recoil and spotting misses/plate tilt is the name of the game. Unless you are Morgun, it really makes things easier.

  • @jeffmiller2433
    @jeffmiller2433 Год назад

    Testing at 100 is very important, as sometimes the wind can be too gusty for proper long range development.

  • @JohnVK5JAK
    @JohnVK5JAK Месяц назад

    As usual, a good lesson. Is the spread sheet you used for plotting speeds and spread available for download?

    • @winninginthewind
      @winninginthewind  Месяц назад +1

      I make those as I go. I really don't have a fixed format.

    • @JohnVK5JAK
      @JohnVK5JAK Месяц назад

      @@winninginthewind I don't suppose you'd have one sheet and graph page I could 'steal' from you to see the columns and formulas etc? I'm only a 'basic' excel user

  • @Pilottoproperties
    @Pilottoproperties Год назад

    When doing powder charge first do you have a regular seating depth you keep uniform for the test until it comes time to do seating depth after you find the correct charge?

  • @cooperbybee5211
    @cooperbybee5211 Год назад

    I'd like to see the Audette ocw explained at length in excruciating detail.

  • @turckskidoo
    @turckskidoo Год назад

    Yes please

  • @bobturner5124
    @bobturner5124 Год назад

    YES!!!!!!!!!

  • @brucepooley9651
    @brucepooley9651 5 месяцев назад

    What software are you using that graphs and gives bullet groupings per load?

  • @benadams4942
    @benadams4942 Год назад

    Yes, 100 yard testing. That's the only distance for testing that I have available.

  • @chrisrobinson2172
    @chrisrobinson2172 11 месяцев назад

    I would really like to see it done at 100 yards since that's the only distance I ever do load work at. Once done the distance confirming begins to verify the load. Mainly because I'm a hunter I guess.

  • @raynovanderwalt
    @raynovanderwalt Год назад

    Yes please for 100yd load development

  • @icep34ch
    @icep34ch Год назад

    Beginner Reloader here: (maybe stupid question but):
    I want to reload .308 with ttsx 150 grain and vitha n135. Hunting ,200m max range , fast but accurate.
    Reloaddata recommend 39.4 grain max load, expirienced friend recommend 42 grain from quickload.
    Dont understand the difference. He says Reloaddata are way understated.
    I am insecure now where i shut Start and End with my powdercharge.

  • @juliusjames5577
    @juliusjames5577 Год назад +2

    Factory ammo😱! How do you sleep at night?

  • @soonersteve3733
    @soonersteve3733 11 месяцев назад

    Is that a Foundation stock I see in the video? That is my choice. 100 yard would be nice.

  • @rrsars7277
    @rrsars7277 Год назад

    Yes

  • @mikecollins8241
    @mikecollins8241 10 месяцев назад

    I'd like to see a video where you start with 50 pieces of brass, 100 (1 box) bullets and an appropriate powder, and develop a "hunting" load... say 2" 3 shot group at 200 yards and still have 20-25 bullets left to load for actual use ;) anything in the .308 family/ case size/ for deer sized game..

    • @winninginthewind
      @winninginthewind  10 месяцев назад

      ruclips.net/video/a26qAvSq2Vw/видео.html
      I fired 22 rounds, and have a 4.25" group at 600 yards... Those Barnes bullets are like magic in my rifle. It's a 308 to boot!

  • @bobmcconkey8666
    @bobmcconkey8666 Год назад

    Yes, show some 100 yard work, perhaps even comparing what you just did at 600 yards.

  • @peterbriggs3408
    @peterbriggs3408 Год назад

    Yes please at 100 as that's the only practice range I have access to

  • @Bowhunter66
    @Bowhunter66 Год назад

    So much easier to read the target doing load development at 600yds or greater. However not everyone has a 600yd range so why not. I'm sure something can be learned

  • @justexisting6186
    @justexisting6186 Год назад

    Hey im still new to reloading and stuff and i got a question, why do you choose 32.4 and 32.6 when number 2 grouping is tighter?

    • @winninginthewind
      @winninginthewind  Год назад

      Because 2 was isolated, leaving little room for error either side.

    • @justexisting6186
      @justexisting6186 Год назад

      @@winninginthewind im sorry but what do you mean by isolated?

    • @winninginthewind
      @winninginthewind  Год назад

      Adjacent charges did not group with it consistently and they also showed tendencies to make bigger overall groups.

    • @justexisting6186
      @justexisting6186 Год назад

      @@winninginthewind what is the example of those said tendencies?

    • @winninginthewind
      @winninginthewind  Год назад

      #1 had 2 significant low impacts, and #3 had a high hit. Those are suggestive of an unstable condition.

  • @LCdonkeyshow
    @LCdonkeyshow Год назад +1

    Do you believe in Dave Tubb's lapping system? You know what I'm talking about?

  • @cwkerber
    @cwkerber 7 месяцев назад

    What is that powder trickler please?

  • @aleclaubscher7403
    @aleclaubscher7403 Год назад

    Very interested in the 100m

  • @tallyman15
    @tallyman15 Год назад

    Keith,
    which Zeiss scope are you using?

    • @winninginthewind
      @winninginthewind  Год назад +3

      That is an LRP S3 6-36. Stay tuned, it’s going to make another appearance on a different rifle…

  • @thegriff9425
    @thegriff9425 Год назад

    Yes. Definitely. I only have access to 100m so that would be perfect.

  • @tomlagatol4448
    @tomlagatol4448 Год назад

    600YDS isn’t available to me, so 1-2-or300yds would be fine for me and appreciated. Thanks.

  • @scotttaylor3258
    @scotttaylor3258 Год назад

    please i would love to see the load development at 100 yards I am loading for nrl hunter match as i type this

  • @scotttaylor3258
    @scotttaylor3258 Год назад

    do you lube necks before seating bullets

  • @NiteQwill_
    @NiteQwill_ Год назад +1

    Most people run 6mm slow in PRS. Not uncommon to see people run between 2750-2850.
    I personally run 6mm between 2650-2750, generally 2700.
    Traveling often for PRS matches all over the country, it's safer to run slow to avoid pressure from heat, rain, and snow that you often encounter from matches all over the US.

    • @Keithapostrophes_Dog
      @Keithapostrophes_Dog Год назад

      Rain and snow (cold) push pressures up? I gotta think about that for a minute...

    • @Keithapostrophes_Dog
      @Keithapostrophes_Dog Год назад

      I think what you meant is if one tuned their load to 2700 at 50 F the velocity wouldn't drop off much in the snow and you would have some headroom in the heat. If you tuned to 2700 at 70 F you might lose 40 fps in the snow and pick up 30 fps at 100 F. I see what you are saying. You could also look at the weather forecast where you are travelling and bump your load up or down a couple of tenths of a grain, depending on your cartrige size. Most of us don't think tuning nodes are 70-80 fps wide. That's the conundrum in my mind.

    • @ruffen1365
      @ruffen1365 Год назад

      Blown primers cost the #2 the win at the world championships, but man could that guy handle recoil like it was an air rifle.

  • @alaindiebra968
    @alaindiebra968 Год назад

    Yes Please do it at 100 yrds

  • @DLT704
    @DLT704 Год назад

    Another vote for 100/200 yards

  • @rdude1184
    @rdude1184 Год назад

    100 yards, please and thank you Sir.

  • @reeleone
    @reeleone Год назад

    You are quit with f class competitions?

  • @roddecker1900
    @roddecker1900 Год назад

    100 yes. Compare vlds? High bc hunters?( probly not) flat bottoms? .ok thats off on a tangent

  • @eugenekazayev1784
    @eugenekazayev1784 Год назад

    Only have access to 100yard range

  • @1TheNewGuy
    @1TheNewGuy Год назад

    Yes, 100 yd load development

  • @justice1327
    @justice1327 Год назад

    Yes do it at 100 yards…then take that best load and see how it does at 600.

  • @jetthreat5000
    @jetthreat5000 Год назад

    Barrel length?