I really enjoy your videos Steve. You have a great knack of talking too your audience rather than talking at them. I learn a lot just listening too you. Keep up the great work Steve.
Good combination, I used a similar setup years ago with a Mamiya 645 because I couldn’t afford a wideangle 😕. I think that experience made me favour longer focal lengths and gave me a dislike for unnecessary space around the main subject.
@@SteveONions that's interesting! I got to favor longer focal lengths as well, but it was after using an ultra wide lens (18mm full frame equivalent) on one of my first digital cameras as my only lens for quite a while. I think standard lenses are underrated in landscape photography :) Cheers.
I think really wide lenses are very hard to use effectively and a lot of people who use them do so because they think you must have one. The standard lens is by far my most used optic, especially on large format.
the 'rambling' bit was actually very interesting. I would love to see the 23mm in action, will have a look through your other videos maybe there is one with it.
That’s a fine collection of Bronica gear, Steve. I think you made a good decision with the two lenses there. I love shooting in my Mamiya 7 (totally agree about the larger neg over 35mm) but I only have one lens at the moment, the 80mm. It makes life simpler but there are times I could do with something a little longer. Keep up the good work and I enjoyed the 10 minute ramble at the start ;-)
Thanks Craig. I generally find the wide, standard, tele combination covers most things but they are hefty. Oddly enough the 4x5 outfit is lighter especially if I use the 6x12 back.
The 65mm F4 PS is my most used lens on the SQ-A. I decided to try the focal length after reading that David Plowden used that focal length the most on his Hasselblad for most of his work back in the day. He's one of my favorite photographers and our typical subject matter is very much in line so I decided to try 65mm out. The quality of the 65mm one for Bronica was really very nice so that's what I've gone with most of the time. Very highly recommended.
@@Rainyfeels I love both lenses but they are never in the bag at the same time. I use the 65mm for most things and the 80mm goes on the camera when it's the only thing I want to take since it's so light and because of the recessed front on the lens, it doesn't really require a lens hood. The 80mm makes a great walking around lens.
Hi Steve, great video. I just became a proud owner of a Bronica SQ-ai (with an 80mm lens) as of two days ago.Beautiful camera. Really happy that I found your video , very educational. Thank you for sharing it.
I’m enjoying watching your adventures with lighter kits. I am not a landscape photographer, but I do get out for a lot of woodlands photography. I am a one camera, one prime lens shooter and carry no bag or tripod when I go out. As you said in one of your videos, photography is a bonus on such outings. Getting out in nature is my primary objective. Oh yes, and I’m largely a 35mm shooter. With one camera clung over my shoulder, I can walk for miles and miles.
Thanks for the video...very informative and well presented... one of the best photography channels I have come across.... Keep up with the excellent work.
Steve, your videos are really inspiring. And seeing you how you enjoy your photography gear, makes me think on getting something similar. But I don't have your talent so I will keep with my gear. I have seen this video more than once, and always, I ended with a lovely taste. Thank you for sharing your videos.
Thank you so very much, dear, sir, for this excellent YT video for considering limiting the choice for more lightweight landscape photography! Very good and interesting facts about Zenza Bronica equipment of optimum choice to keep the weight on the lighter side! Wishing you all the best, and stay both safe and healthy! Best regards from Sweden! PS. Dear, sir, may I add this; that your early-morning captures were outstandingly beautiful! Highly enjoyable and very well done YT-video, in every measure!
Wonderful tutorial. I have a similar set up with the Bronica GS-1 and have been pondering which lenses I want to take with me, so this is a good starting point. Beautiful images too. I have subscribed to your channel as well. Thank you.
i love your photos in this video. i use a rollei sl66 with the holy trinity (50, 80, 150). i also thought about a 60mm lens as a replacement for my 50mm and 80 lens, but i can live with the weight and i always use all of my lenses. cant live without it. :)
Can’t disagree with that lens choice, pretty much the same for me for many years. I’ll only be taking the lightweight setup on specific trips from now on.
Steve, exactly my equivalent kit with my RB67. 2 lenses, 85 and 35 equiv, 1 extra loaded back, couple rolls of film. The viewfinder preview ap on my iphone not only gives me the crop of my lenses but also shows me the image in the film stock especially in b&w, so valuable. The reflective meter is pretty accurate, accurate enough for b&w. If not, have a gossen meter the size of a couple of small match boxes. Both work fine but if I know getting precise on zone placement then the sekonic. My metal tripod has a sling so goes over my shoulder. My 135 equiv 250 mm never leaves the studio.
I’m still mixing and matching the Bronica lenses to suit the situation and often take just two. I do like the 50,80,150 combination if I’m not going too far but I also rarely take the 250mm.
Good choice for the minimum gear selection. Think I will try the same with my Mamiya RB67. One 65mm and one 150mm. I will take along the prism finder to shoot high. Interesting talk in the beginning, as many of us want to see what the other guy has in his kit...lol. Thanks for the walk and conversation. Keep well.
Thanks for sharing your enthusiasm for film, film cameras and photography in general. I'm old school at heart and started using film cameras again. I've got a Rolleiflex 6002 and Rollei TLR E2, I still really enjoy the B/W film processing as well. Keep up the very inspiring videos.
First off, beautiful shots as always Steve. Do you have any experience with the SQ 110mm macro? I'm in a similar situation where I only want to carry two lenses and I'm trying to decide between getting the 150mm or the 110mm macro because I like doing macro, but 110mm is a bit short for a telephoto (60mm equivalent).
I’ve never used the 110 but have considered getting one from time to time. The 1:1 version is expensive and large so I’ve recently got the S-18 extension tube but I am wary of it getting locked onto my lens as many people have reported. A close up filter works very well too if you stop the lens right down.
Well done, as usual, Steve. I did not find your discussion of lens selection rambling, not in the least. Good to hear your logic. I face similar choices and can usually come up with a three lens-set (usually 35, 50, 105mm) but not a two-lens set. I generally view the 35 and 50 as able to back-up one-another and thus far have been reluctant to narrow it to two. Best wishes for the Holiday Season to you and your family and for a healthy and enjoyable 2019.
Just bought an SQ-Ai with 80mm. Used to have one in the old days sold it to fund digital, my bad. Looking to get 150, 65 and 40 to make a set wit 2 backs one for B&W the other for Provia slide film. Your work and these videos have inspired me. BTW I also have a Fujifilm GFX 50s which is awesome but not quire the same.
Watched this again due to, as you know, having just bought an SQAi, as I was interested in guidance on expansion ....really helpful Steve and you have already saved me from making expensive mistakes... which yellow filter do you use? and do you bother with a skylight filter ( in the old days we were advised to use one but in recent years the advice has changed) . Thanks for helping to keep film alive
Hope the Bronica journey is going well Malcolm. Most yellow filters aren’t numbered these days but the main two are a No8 and a No12 with the latter being a deeper shade. I think the typical filter is more of a 12 as my own No8’s are very subtle indeed. As for the skylight, no point these days as the colour is best adjusted in post processing. All the best.
Very interesting insights into film photography equipment. I was born into the digital era so I have to say my knowledge and experience of the film world is extremely limited. Videos like this really perk my interest however. Absolutely fascinating!
Cheers James. There’s not that much difference between film and digital, mostly it is in the ability to preview shots which is why I do this on my iPhone.
Great video as always. My OCD can’t ignore that the photo you have mounted above your fireplace doesn’t appear to be centred with the fireplace. 🤣 Great to see another Bronica shooter. I can’t get enough of mine.
Hi Steve, I have no axe to grind here, but I am just now in the market for a 6x6 camera, and I have looked for months to find a Hasselblad in my price range. Not to be, But... I stumbled upon this video recently about the Bronica SQa, and started looking at images on 500px. Is it just me, or do the images out of this camera, look better than the images out of the Hassy? They seem sharper, more contrasty, and overall very pleasing.
Hi Monty. It’s. It not easy to sum up the differences between the systems, they are similar in a lot of ways to be honest. I owned a Hasselblad for 4 years and loved using it, great lenses too. I never shot colour in it though so cannot do a full comparison with the Bronica
Very interesting thought process. Back when I was somewhat active I really liked having a pretty long lens for segregating detail when I couldn't physically get closer but I can see that quite a lot can be done with a slightly short and a slightly long. Would love to see what you could do with just a fixed lens TLR and a tripod. 🙂 P.S. regarding the prism finder could you not just set up the camera sideways on the tripod and view the finder from the side?
I also like the short telephoto for a lot of work, it removes unecessary elements from the frame. I do have a TLR video or two out there and yes, you can tilt the WLF on it's side and dispense with the prism finder altogether!
Hi Steve! Just curious why did you opt for the bronica over the hasselblad? I'm not a hassyfanboy but wouldn't an all mechanical be favored for an electrical in landscape? Cheers
I used to have a Hasselblad outfit Simon and it was also very good. There’s not much between the two cameras and both have strengths and weaknesses, bit of a toss up as to which is best.
I have a Bronica EC with the 50mm f4 Nikkor lens. Awesome. My main lens is a Vega 12b 90mm 2.8 on a Kiev 6c with a waistlevel finder only. Light weight. The waist level finder on the Kiev has the ability to focus at eye level too. I Use Kodak Portra 800 and meter with a Hanimex Sekonic Selenium meter. So no batteries to worry about with the Kiev. 58mm filters on the Vega 90mm lens
Another great informative video, where in N wales is it please, thats where I live (N Wales), just had a massive clearout of my 35mm camera collection enabling me to buy a Bronica ETRS system and Bronica SQ-A system, cant wait for some time off this weekend to get to use them. Always wanted one since 1988 when I was chairman of a camera club, well now its happened. keep up the good videos really enjoy them
Great work and good to see another Bronica and large format user. I'm using a darkroom for printing and also scanning negs to print on an Epson 3880....do you have a preference for your work (I.e darkroom v. scanning)
Hmm, darkroom v scanning. The later is a lot easier and I can make an infinite number of manipulations prior to output but a well execute darkroom print is still my preferred medium.
A couple of years ago I drove down to Essex to pick up a 5x4 enlarger I'd bought from a professional still working with film (I believe he once worked for Ilford). He showed me a 16x12 darkroom print he'd made of a studio shot of a newly wed couple in a staged mid-waltz. The quality of the printed image took my breath away...it was stunning.....I was instantly thinking Pan F or FP4 on a large format camera of some description developed in some sort of exotic secret developer.....The reality was HP5 on a 35mm Canon F1 developed in stock ID11....and the other (much more significant) reality was that he was just brilliant at his craft....I learned a lot that day...in just a couple of minutes
It’s remarkable what can be done with years of skill and a knowledge of how to extract the best from your equipment. On occasion I’ve made darkroom prints from 35mm that look like the best medium format shots.
Great stuff as usual and wonderful square compositions (thanks for pointing out how much I need to improve mine). You've also got me thinking of dusting off my 150mm and having a go with it.
I used the Bronica SQ system for quite a while, i have to say the 150mm PS was probably my favourite part of the system, absolutely beautiful lens and i agree the 50mm was always a complete letdown for me, moved over to the RZ67 about 2 years ago so you can probably guess i never had the issue of weight and wanted to make myself suffer a bit more
awesome video Steve. Back in my wedding days I had 2 ETRS bodies and 1 ETRSi a 150mm 75mm and a 50mm plus 4 backs. 7 years ago I had a massive clear out of old kit, I only kept the ETRSi the 75 and 50mm plus 1 back.......I've just today loaded a 16 year old roll of Kodak Portra 160 not sure how the film will hold up but enjoying having a shoot. Cracking photos mate the shot at 15:00 is stunning top work mate.
Steve O'Nions get the photos back today the lab say as a ball park to half the iso for every ten years fingers crossed there will be something on there agreed tho my old film cams fell so solid compared to the digis but the main thing I’m enjoying is the simplicity no scrolling through endless menus no charging batteries just a hand held meter set the iso the speed and aperture then go make photos it’s quite liberating 📷✊🏻❤️🚐
Love the square format. There's nothing quite like the feel of a waist-level camera and the tiny click of a in-lens shutter. I'm pretty much married to the hassy 500c system and get shear enjoyment while using it in the field. There is something about shooting with a 60 year old camera that just feels so good. Also, I tried some of your composition techniques last year and had some good results. (my film developing needs improvement though) Thanks for a little insight.
Hi Steve, I've been through a similar process of trying to cut down equipment. With my Intrepid 4x5, I limited myself from the outset to just two lens, namely 90mm and 150mm. For my Mamiya RZ67, I have four film backs and four lenses - 50mm, 65mm, 110mm, and 180mm. I hardly ever carried more than three but I want to get that down to two. I may try either taking 50mm and 110mm, or 65mm and 180mm, depending upon the location and subject matter. I got rid of the prism awhile ago because of the weight and bulk - yes it is a a problem using the WLF with a high tripod position but you have to accept some compromises. I'm also planning to reduce to two film choices, namely FP4+ and Portra 400, so I'll never need more than two backs.
Good choices Kevin, slimming down the film stock is just as important in my opinion as it makes scene selection easier not to mention reducing the developing hassle later. BTW I enjoy your blog posts :)
really interesting! im keen to shoot some landscapes with medium format too! Very useful video! A Bronica SQAi might be added to the list haha thanks Steve :-)
Lovely gear!, but I'm also trying to limit myself in the options and develop a workflow where I deal with the limitations, developing more the creativity. Besides using a 35mm Nikon system, I'm just barely starting with medium format film and have only a zoom for the Mamiya 645. Beautiful images and video Steve, thanks!!!!
I also use 35mm Nikon extensively alongside medium and large format, they all have their strengths. You are right to focus on the creativity, the camera is just an extension of that.
Nice ramble... both in the house and out in the field :). Have been interested to see what "you have in the bag" so thanks for that. Some nice images and your choice of lens didn't seem to inhibit you shooting - go with what you have at the time. When you mentioned mountains I did expect to see you up a mountain not on the beach mind :) Loved the image with Moelwyn Mawr & Moelwyn Bach in the background, it's a pity that peninsular does not open up a bit more to inc the iconic Cnicht in that view , which has a great angle to look at from that area. Do you take the Bronica up in the hills? Anyway, great vlog to watch on this wet n windy Sunday morning, thx.
Hi Alan. I went for the coast thanks to the forecast and good angle on the sunrise at this time of year. I have lugged a full Bronica outfit up mountains before but it get tiring as the day wears on and adds a lot of pressure on my knees during the descent. I agree that the view could do with opening up a bit more but that’s something we are stuck with.
Hello Steve, I have just fallen over your channel in searches for film photography, great channel and I have sub’d. I mainly shoot an Ebony 4x5 but also have an ETRS. Out of interest, why did you exchange/sell the Hasselblad kit for the Bronica which is the same film format? Kind regards Graham.
Interestingly I’ve an upcoming video comparing the Hasselblad and Bronica 😊. The reason I no longer have the former is due to going digital (briefly) and selling it.
Hi Steve, I was wondering, why did you prefer the Bronica over the Hasselblad? Do you see any difference between the two when it comes to image quality?
Hi Jarmal. There’s little to choose between the Blad and Bronica but I sold the former in 2012 and when I got back into film I couldn’t afford to buy another one 😕. The Bronica is more modern and has some advantages in terms of electronically timed shutter speeds down to 16 seconds and tends to need less maintenance. On the other hand the Blad has a more extensive range of lenses and accessories and the likes of the 50mm Distagon CF FLE is superior to the equivalent 50mm Zenzanon. Overall I’d call it a draw but the Blad has the greater prestige and sadly a much higher price tag too.
@@SteveONions Ah check thank you fort he response! I was wondering if the Zeiss lenses in general might be superior than the Zenzanons, but it seems that can only be judged on a lens to lens basis. Love your videos btw!
What a beautiful system you have. But how do you compare the Bronica lenses with the Zeiss ones for Hasselblad? Do they deliver comparable image quality?
It’s a close call with the lenses. The latter Zeiss lenses are all excellent, i was particularly impressed with the 50mm Distagon CF FLE which is a lot better than the equivalent Bronica. The other Bronica lenses I have are definitely on par with the Zeiss equivalents though.
I'm right there with you I have the 50mm S but it's going to get sold or traded for something for my GS-1 outfit. My favorites for the SQ system are the 80mm PS and 150mm PS and I carry those the most with an unmetered prism and two or three backs (although I have 5 backs). I got the waist level finder but I had the same issue as you with tripod height so I tend to just use the prism finder unless I'm shooting hand held walking around. I have the 65mm PS also which is a nice lens but it doesn't get used as much, I should get it out more really. I think ultimately I'll stick to 3 lenses for my SQAI and get rid of that 50mm S which I never have really loved. my GS-1 kit has the 65mm and 100mm PG lenses so far and I'm hoping to get a 150mm or 200mm PG as well and then call it a day on that kit too. It's fun to have a complete kit but often I go there and then stuff just collects dust so I'm trying to be more practical about my gear purchases .... that saved money can go to film.
I keep trying out different lens combinations with the Sq but like you I prefer the 80 and 150 overall. I have tried to love the 65 but it’s a hefty beast and it rarely comes out sadly.
Nice interesting video and great photographs, One of the things I love about my Rolleiflex along with the weight is the lens choice is decided for me .
Loved the look through your kit, nice collection, I've got SQai 2 backs 3 lenses (150 80 & 50 all PS) been after a prism for a while now. Loved the bay curve image at 15:00
I used a simple kit, one lens, a 50mm f4 Nikkor wide angle lens and a Bronica EC camera. Slik 88 tripod with a Linhof ball head. My friend had the Bronica 50mm lens which wasn't sharp at all. The Nikkor was incredibly crisp.
I’ve also got the 50mm Zenzanon S Neil and it definitely isn’t that sharp. The Zeiss 50mm CD FLE on the Blad is in a different league. The 40mm Zenzanon PS really does shine though.
I was longing for a medium format system, but I couldn't decide on what I wanted. My criteria were: * Not Hasselblad expensive. * MUST be fully mechanical, no reliance on electronics. * I wanted a very wide angle on 6x6, a normal lens and a tele lens. * I wanted the option to shoot 6x4.5 * I wanted a prism viewfinder as an option * Ideally, common issues can be fixed at home myself I chose the Bronica S2A, the 40mm, 75mm and 200mm Nikkor lenses, a 6x6 and 6x4.5 back and the prism finder as an option. I looked at the SQAi too, it was a contender.
Great video Steve but you're showing your age. I remember when you would have carried the entire kit up a mountain. NO, seriously. I liked your thought process on this one. It was good to hear your reasons for leaving out certain elements of the kit. It's going to be interesting to see how this develops. Nice shots also.
Hi Steve, I have a similar setup with Mamiya 645. I started out with the 645 and acquired many of the same types of lenses (35, 45, 80, 150, and 180mm zoom lens). I typically haul 2 lenses 35 or 45mm + 150mm similar to you. I don’t use the prism finder. I prefer waist level and the weight is really high. Still All the men’s choices and film choices doesn’t get you away from the problem you outlined in the beginning. There is still something nice about the single lens and film choice and that simplicity.
I also had that lens line up when I shot with the M645 and typical just took 3 of them at a time. If I go with a single lens I prefer a camera with it built in such as a TLR or folder.
That's similar with my ETRS. My 55 rarely gets used but the 75 and 150 are regularly in use.
5 лет назад
For a moment I thought you were going to ditch the tripod also! I would have included the normal lens, but yes for the rest, I think making themed photoshoots like this is the way to go :) That said I always bring a 35mm camera too for the snapshotting leisure I can't have with my Bronica! You don't make detail photography? You have no macro rings or lenses. Thank you for your great videos that I enjoy a lot. I especially like the rhythm and calm of those. Cheers!
Thanks Joel. I carry a small closeup lens for those rare occasions I need to get very close to the subject. I also carry 35mm on short trips but generally stick to one format at a time.
If that had been me as soon as I finished recording the first bit I would have started sneaking stuff back in, because...well...maybe. I'm trying to build up my ETRSi system but I’m a long way behind you. I have considered getting another larger camera but the 645 gives me decent lenses and I've decided I want one good complete system much like yours. I have the blue and black filter case and I love it. Gorgeous images Steve, and a brilliant video and I found it all very interesting indeed and I think you’ve helped me with regard to future purchases.
Thanks Mark. I think 645 has more than enough image quality for most situations and it still quite portable. I just struggle with flipping the camera on its side for vertical shots.
I was surprised you left the prism viewfinder. I just don't know if I could shoot an upside down image and I hadn't even considered the additional height it provides above the tripod. I guess you get use to that over time? It seems it would be difficult to compose and focus. I love that format though. Great shots even with the houses.
Hi Steve, I am considering the 50mm PS rather than the S have you any experience of this lens? You say the S is not sharp, is it so bad that it is not worth looking at?
I’ve considered the PS version but everything I read tells me they are optically identical. The S has the convenient 67mm filter which is why I use it. The lens is not as good as others in the range and I avoid f22 completely having done a set of tests. It is never pin sharp like the 80 and 150mm. The 40mm PS is sharper overall and can be used at f/22 so despite the awkward 95mm filter thread I am using it more and more. If you really need a good 50mm I’m afraid it has to be something like a Zeiss Distagon CF FLE but for that you’ll also need a Hasselblad 😕
@@SteveONions Thanks for the feedback Steve, I have gone for th 40mm S version, not sure it'll take filters though there appears to be a permanent petal Les hood attached. I'll see when it arrives later this week. I really enjoy your film stuff particularly the Bronica excursions.
@@SteveONions Hi Steve, I just thought you'd like to see my first shot with my new SQ-Ai I posted it here, realphotographersforum.com/forum/threads/medium-format-film-first-shot.24221/
I did a couple more trips with the outfit Neville but reverted back to the 50, 80, 150 lenses and also the prism finder. It’s barely any heavier if I just carry one back to be honest.
I have a newbee question. I have Bronica ETRS with 50, 75 and 150mm. Will they be good (compatibile) for SQ body. ETRS is 4.5x6 format so, in theory, it should cover 6cm circle. But i have no way to check this (very little info on internet). Maybe, in future, i will buy SQ so having already good lenses would helped me a lot.
Hi Aleksander. Unfortunately the Bronica SQ and ETRS cannot share lenses so you would need to purchase new ones if you go for the Square format camera.
Great video Steve and some lovely images you got. I'm thinking of starting out with large format having never tried it before. I'm just wondering if you do your own developing or do you digitize your images in lightroom/photoshop.
Hi David. It was an odd journey that started when I gave up the darkroom and film in 2012 due to suffering with chest problems and hypersensitivity to the chemicals. Just about everything was sold and I went digital but within 2 years I was totally dissatisfied with my photography which had deteriorated (and was still going south). I decided I would try a hybrid workflow and rather than spend £3k on another Hasselblad setup I went with the Bronica which cost around £600 for the same spec. I’d say it was pretty much a draw when comparing the two systems , the Bronica being better regarding the electronic shutter (16 sec max and each lens totally accurate) whilst the Blad had a more compact body and importantly a superior 50mm (CF-FLE). I can’t see me moving back to a Blad unless someone gave me one and I would miss a lot of the Bronica features but I really miss that 50mm.
@@SteveONions thanks for the reply. I bought a Bronica system about 10 years ago for not very much. It goes in and out of rotation for me so it's nice to see exceptional work being made with it.
Enjoyed watching this and the images are lovely as always. I am looking forward to seeing more of your minimalist trips. I also surprisingly found a prism finder essential when I take my Hasselblad - also helps as mine has the light meter integrated. In general I have been a huge fan of taking only one camera and one lens for my trips. If I am taking the Hasselblad I might add an extension tube or a teleconverter. After having done that for quite some time now and finding it so liberating and noticing that I usually go with the same focal length anyway, I finally decided to go really minimal with my whole camera set-up and am currently reducing it to my Sony RX1, my Hasselblad 2000 with only one lens, and my 4x5 with one lens (possibility for a second depending on the decision about my 8x10). Thanks for sharing your thoughts :-)
That’s a good collection of cameras Isabel, all capable of superb images. I find that I can manage with fewer lenses as the format increases in size. I like a couple of zooms with Micro 4/3 and 3 primes ideally with the Bronica. I want to get down to two lenses with the 4x5 and probably stick with just one on the 8x10.
Steve O'Nions I think the advantage of LF is that you can really use some of the lenses on both formats. I have a 229 for the 4x5 and a 305 for the 8x10 but that would also be a lovely tele on the 4x5. It is easy for me as I prefer the normal to long focal lengths anyway, so no need for anything wide. Wishing you luck with the 'downsizing' of the Bronica collection ;-) I did that for my Hasselblad some years ago...from 7 lenses down to first 3, then 2 and finally just one. It is possible ;-)
The lenses aren’t compatible unfortunately Norman. I’m not familiar with the S2a, it was the earlier generation model and very rare in the UK from what I’ve seen (never actually come across one in person). .
norman tesch I would say no, there’s little difference unless you are a dedicated 6x6 shooter. The 645 format is almost perfect for portraits so I would stick with the ETRS.
Hi , can you hel me please , I have Bronica sq-ai and it's new I try first test rool HP5 and images soft I mean not sharp eenaff, I think I have a problem incorrect fitted focusing glass, or any suggesting, can you make a video about this problem or help with explain how to fitted Focusing glass, thank you
Hi Roman and sorry to hear about the focussing screen. To determine if it is indeed the screen you could shoot a roll of film using the distance scales on the lens, one at infinity and other gradually closer. Shoot the same scenes using the focus screen and compare the sharpness. They should be the same and if not the screen and focus should be checked by a repairman.
Fascinating insight into film photography Steve. Really enjoyed watching you go through your gear and discuss the merits of your equipment. I really liked your image "Bay Curves" at 15:02. Beautifully simple with the leading line of the curve taking your eye up to the house in the distance. Great work Steve. :-)
Hi Steve. Interesting stuff. I guess we're all guilty of carrying too much kit, most of which rarely comes out of the bag. Your approach here is really logical and something we can all learn from ! You've produced a set of lovely images so I hope you feel the experiment worked. Very informative video Steve. Many thanks for sharing. P.S. That looks a cracking location - was it Anglesey?
Thanks Tim. The location is next to Porthmadog and very easy to get to, just a couple of minutes from a handy car park and lots of different viewpoints.
@@SteveONions looks super i had the etrsi years ago the images were fab im getting back into film again just bought on flea bay a yashica fm with a ml yashica 50mm 1.4 lets see what that does, i need somewhere to develop BW here in austria but i might send it to blighty. im driving the wife nuts buying cameras. Keep up the good work.
Man, I know that feeling, but it's like a freedom off your shoulders when you just pair down to absolutely the essentials. It feels really good.
I love it too, it just makes life so much easier (until you realise that the perfect composition needs one of the lenses you left at home 😉)
I really enjoy your videos Steve. You have a great knack of talking too your audience rather than talking at them. I learn a lot just listening too you. Keep up the great work Steve.
Thank you.
Pretty similar to my kit. I got rid of the 50mm and 250mm, and kept just the 80mm and 150mm (love this one). Good video!
Good combination, I used a similar setup years ago with a Mamiya 645 because I couldn’t afford a wideangle 😕. I think that experience made me favour longer focal lengths and gave me a dislike for unnecessary space around the main subject.
@@SteveONions that's interesting! I got to favor longer focal lengths as well, but it was after using an ultra wide lens (18mm full frame equivalent) on one of my first digital cameras as my only lens for quite a while. I think standard lenses are underrated in landscape photography :) Cheers.
I think really wide lenses are very hard to use effectively and a lot of people who use them do so because they think you must have one.
The standard lens is by far my most used optic, especially on large format.
the 'rambling' bit was actually very interesting. I would love to see the 23mm in action, will have a look through your other videos maybe there is one with it.
Your work is absolutely stunning Steve, thanks for keeping the film landscape shooters dreams alive!
Thanks Ross.
That’s a fine collection of Bronica gear, Steve. I think you made a good decision with the two lenses there. I love shooting in my Mamiya 7 (totally agree about the larger neg over 35mm) but I only have one lens at the moment, the 80mm. It makes life simpler but there are times I could do with something a little longer. Keep up the good work and I enjoyed the 10 minute ramble at the start ;-)
Thanks Craig. I generally find the wide, standard, tele combination covers most things but they are hefty. Oddly enough the 4x5 outfit is lighter especially if I use the 6x12 back.
I am impressed with your collection of SQAi equipment. I appreciate you making this video.
Thanks Erich.
Great stuff! I liked seeing you go through your gear and your thought process on what to take and leave behind. Cheers!
Loved the Bay Curves image. I think that shot is the perfect example of how the square format can work with landscapes.
Thanks Jon, the whole location seems to lend itself to the 1:1 format.
The 65mm F4 PS is my most used lens on the SQ-A. I decided to try the focal length after reading that David Plowden used that focal length the most on his Hasselblad for most of his work back in the day. He's one of my favorite photographers and our typical subject matter is very much in line so I decided to try 65mm out. The quality of the 65mm one for Bronica was really very nice so that's what I've gone with most of the time. Very highly recommended.
Do you prefer it over the 80? Ever miss the extra stop of light? I'm buying a kit now and deciding between 80 & 65mm
@@Rainyfeels I love both lenses but they are never in the bag at the same time. I use the 65mm for most things and the 80mm goes on the camera when it's the only thing I want to take since it's so light and because of the recessed front on the lens, it doesn't really require a lens hood. The 80mm makes a great walking around lens.
Hi Steve, great video. I just became a proud owner of a Bronica SQ-ai (with an 80mm lens) as of two days ago.Beautiful camera. Really happy that I found your video , very educational. Thank you for sharing it.
Hope you have fun with your new Bronica.
Beautiful Images from that trip. Impossible to choose which one is the best, of those 2 wonderful shots.
Thank you.
That is a huge selection of SQ gear. True, I'm not a fan of my 50mm either, and now I know why.
Great video. Thanks.
Thank you 🙂
I’m enjoying watching your adventures with lighter kits. I am not a landscape photographer, but I do get out for a lot of woodlands photography. I am a one camera, one prime lens shooter and carry no bag or tripod when I go out. As you said in one of your videos, photography is a bonus on such outings. Getting out in nature is my primary objective. Oh yes, and I’m largely a 35mm shooter. With one camera clung over my shoulder, I can walk for miles and miles.
I’ve quite a few 35mm one camera one lens videos coming soon Tom.
Thanks for the video...very informative and well presented... one of the best photography channels I have come across.... Keep up with the excellent work.
Thank you.
Steve, your videos are really inspiring. And seeing you how you enjoy your photography gear, makes me think on getting something similar. But I don't have your talent so I will keep with my gear. I have seen this video more than once, and always, I ended with a lovely taste. Thank you for sharing your videos.
Glad you liked it and don’t put yourself down, I’m just an amateur who doesn’t get out nearly enough - we can all make great images 👍
Don't skip. It's all good 😊
Thank you so very much, dear, sir, for this excellent YT video for considering limiting the choice for more lightweight landscape photography! Very good and interesting facts about Zenza Bronica equipment of optimum choice to keep the weight on the lighter side! Wishing you all the best, and stay both safe and healthy! Best regards from Sweden!
PS. Dear, sir, may I add this; that your early-morning captures were outstandingly beautiful! Highly enjoyable and very well done YT-video, in every measure!
Thank you. Interestingly I’m revisiting the lightweight setup first used here, it just seems to feel right.
You have a very good sense of composition. Very classy. 👍
Thanks Clement.
You put so much work into your videos that you inspire me to go out and create. Thank you.
Thanks Edwin, I could not have asked for more 🙂
Love the second photo with the subtle red phone box on the cliff...
Thanks Michiel.
Wonderful tutorial. I have a similar set up with the Bronica GS-1 and have been pondering which lenses I want to take with me, so this is a good starting point. Beautiful images too. I have subscribed to your channel as well. Thank you.
Thank you.
i love your photos in this video. i use a rollei sl66 with the holy trinity (50, 80, 150). i also thought about a 60mm lens as a replacement for my 50mm and 80 lens, but i can live with the weight and i always use all of my lenses. cant live without it. :)
Can’t disagree with that lens choice, pretty much the same for me for many years. I’ll only be taking the lightweight setup on specific trips from now on.
Steve, exactly my equivalent kit with my RB67. 2 lenses, 85 and 35 equiv, 1 extra loaded back, couple rolls of film. The viewfinder preview ap on my iphone not only gives me the crop of my lenses but also shows me the image in the film stock especially in b&w, so valuable. The reflective meter is pretty accurate, accurate enough for b&w. If not, have a gossen meter the size of a couple of small match boxes. Both work fine but if I know getting precise on zone placement then the sekonic. My metal tripod has a sling so goes over my shoulder. My 135 equiv 250 mm never leaves the studio.
I’m still mixing and matching the Bronica lenses to suit the situation and often take just two. I do like the 50,80,150 combination if I’m not going too far but I also rarely take the 250mm.
Hi Steve. I only just discovered your channel today. I really enjoy how you cover different parts of the process in each film. Great stuff. Thanks.
Thanks Tim, I try to keep a balance of the equipment, process and location and above all make it entertaining. I’m glad you like it 👍
My god, very nice pictures really ..... I’m a new follower. 👍
Thank you 🙂
Good choice for the minimum gear selection. Think I will try the same with my Mamiya RB67. One 65mm and one 150mm. I will take along the prism finder to shoot high. Interesting talk in the beginning, as many of us want to see what the other guy has in his kit...lol. Thanks for the walk and conversation. Keep well.
I’d agree with decision to carry the Prism Wayne, I really missed it and have started carrying it again.
with the RB you really gotta be selective because it's already a tank :)
Great video thanks - stayed for all the gear stuff too !
Another good one. Presently shooting an old but still sharp etrs. May have to upgrade. Thank you sir.
Thanks for sharing your enthusiasm for film, film cameras and photography in general. I'm old school at heart and started using film cameras again. I've got a Rolleiflex 6002 and Rollei TLR E2, I still really enjoy the B/W film processing as well. Keep up the very inspiring videos.
Thanks Alex, I hope you have fun with the Rollei.
First off, beautiful shots as always Steve. Do you have any experience with the SQ 110mm macro? I'm in a similar situation where I only want to carry two lenses and I'm trying to decide between getting the 150mm or the 110mm macro because I like doing macro, but 110mm is a bit short for a telephoto (60mm equivalent).
I’ve never used the 110 but have considered getting one from time to time. The 1:1 version is expensive and large so I’ve recently got the S-18 extension tube but I am wary of it getting locked onto my lens as many people have reported.
A close up filter works very well too if you stop the lens right down.
I absolutely love your film work and all you put into it. Thanks for sharing
Thanks Tony.
Well done, as usual, Steve. I did not find your discussion of lens selection rambling, not in the least. Good to hear your logic. I face similar choices and can usually come up with a three lens-set (usually 35, 50, 105mm) but not a two-lens set. I generally view the 35 and 50 as able to back-up one-another and thus far have been reluctant to narrow it to two. Best wishes for the Holiday Season to you and your family and for a healthy and enjoyable 2019.
Thanks Frank and all the best to you too.
Just bought an SQ-Ai with 80mm. Used to have one in the old days sold it to fund digital, my bad. Looking to get 150, 65 and 40 to make a set wit 2 backs one for B&W the other for Provia slide film. Your work and these videos have inspired me. BTW I also have a Fujifilm GFX 50s which is awesome but not quire the same.
Very nice, thank you for your time and effort!
My pleasure!
Enjoyed the video Steve. Also thought the images were stronger than I've seen in a while. Hope you're pleased with them.
Thanks, the location was well suited to the square format.
Watched this again due to, as you know, having just bought an SQAi, as I was interested in guidance on expansion ....really helpful Steve and you have already saved me from making expensive mistakes... which yellow filter do you use? and do you bother with a skylight filter ( in the old days we were advised to use one but in recent years the advice has changed) . Thanks for helping to keep film alive
Hope the Bronica journey is going well Malcolm. Most yellow filters aren’t numbered these days but the main two are a No8 and a No12 with the latter being a deeper shade. I think the typical filter is more of a 12 as my own No8’s are very subtle indeed.
As for the skylight, no point these days as the colour is best adjusted in post processing.
All the best.
Keep up your good work Steve, it's really inspiring. From Norway :)
Thank you.
Love your informative videos and your sincerity
Thank Rick.
Quite a lens collection!
I think the 150 works nicely, perhaps a 100-135 ? Would be ideal.
Not used the Bronica system, thanks for the insight.
Hmmm, I saw a 110 macro in a shop yesterday .......must resist 🙂
Very interesting insights into film photography equipment. I was born into the digital era so I have to say my knowledge and experience of the film world is extremely limited. Videos like this really perk my interest however. Absolutely fascinating!
Cheers James. There’s not that much difference between film and digital, mostly it is in the ability to preview shots which is why I do this on my iPhone.
I enjoyed the gear related part, you should do more of these.
Thanks.
Should of included the tripod too, if you have more than one to choose from!
Very nice images!
Great video as always. My OCD can’t ignore that the photo you have mounted above your fireplace doesn’t appear to be centred with the fireplace. 🤣 Great to see another Bronica shooter. I can’t get enough of mine.
Haha, I must level that picture!
Nice Bronica kit. I'm trying to downsize my landscape kit by using my Sony A7rIII with Loxia lenses.
Lovely lenses
Hi Steve, I have no axe to grind here, but I am just now in the market for a 6x6 camera, and I have looked for months to find a Hasselblad in my price range. Not to be, But... I stumbled upon this video recently about the Bronica SQa, and started looking at images on 500px. Is it just me, or do the images out of this camera, look better than the images out of the Hassy? They seem sharper, more contrasty, and overall very pleasing.
Hi Monty. It’s. It not easy to sum up the differences between the systems, they are similar in a lot of ways to be honest. I owned a Hasselblad for 4 years and loved using it, great lenses too. I never shot colour in it though so cannot do a full comparison with the Bronica
Very interesting thought process. Back when I was somewhat active I really liked having a pretty long lens for segregating detail when I couldn't physically get closer but I can see that quite a lot can be done with a slightly short and a slightly long.
Would love to see what you could do with just a fixed lens TLR and a tripod. 🙂
P.S. regarding the prism finder could you not just set up the camera sideways on the tripod and view the finder from the side?
I also like the short telephoto for a lot of work, it removes unecessary elements from the frame.
I do have a TLR video or two out there and yes, you can tilt the WLF on it's side and dispense with the prism finder altogether!
Hi Steve! Just curious why did you opt for the bronica over the hasselblad? I'm not a hassyfanboy but wouldn't an all mechanical be favored for an electrical in landscape? Cheers
I used to have a Hasselblad outfit Simon and it was also very good. There’s not much between the two cameras and both have strengths and weaknesses, bit of a toss up as to which is best.
I have a Bronica EC with the 50mm f4 Nikkor lens. Awesome.
My main lens is a Vega 12b 90mm 2.8 on a Kiev 6c with a waistlevel finder only. Light weight.
The waist level finder on the Kiev has the ability to focus at eye level too. I Use Kodak Portra 800 and meter with a Hanimex Sekonic Selenium meter. So no batteries to worry about with the Kiev.
58mm filters on the Vega 90mm lens
Another great informative video, where in N wales is it please, thats where I live (N Wales), just had a massive clearout of my 35mm camera collection enabling me to buy a Bronica ETRS system and Bronica SQ-A system, cant wait for some time off this weekend to get to use them. Always wanted one since 1988 when I was chairman of a camera club, well now its happened. keep up the good videos really enjoy them
It was filmed at Borth-y-Gest, a great sunrise location. Hope you’ve managed to get out with the Bronica’s today.
Great work and good to see another Bronica and large format user. I'm using a darkroom for printing and also scanning negs to print on an Epson 3880....do you have a preference for your work (I.e darkroom v. scanning)
Hmm, darkroom v scanning. The later is a lot easier and I can make an infinite number of manipulations prior to output but a well execute darkroom print is still my preferred medium.
A couple of years ago I drove down to Essex to pick up a 5x4 enlarger I'd bought from a professional still working with film (I believe he once worked for Ilford). He showed me a 16x12 darkroom print he'd made of a studio shot of a newly wed couple in a staged mid-waltz. The quality of the printed image took my breath away...it was stunning.....I was instantly thinking Pan F or FP4 on a large format camera of some description developed in some sort of exotic secret developer.....The reality was HP5 on a 35mm Canon F1 developed in stock ID11....and the other (much more significant) reality was that he was just brilliant at his craft....I learned a lot that day...in just a couple of minutes
It’s remarkable what can be done with years of skill and a knowledge of how to extract the best from your equipment. On occasion I’ve made darkroom prints from 35mm that look like the best medium format shots.
Great stuff as usual and wonderful square compositions (thanks for pointing out how much I need to improve mine). You've also got me thinking of dusting off my 150mm and having a go with it.
Thanks Frank. I’d be lost without the 150mm.
I used the Bronica SQ system for quite a while, i have to say the 150mm PS was probably my favourite part of the system, absolutely beautiful lens and i agree the 50mm was always a complete letdown for me, moved over to the RZ67 about 2 years ago so you can probably guess i never had the issue of weight and wanted to make myself suffer a bit more
I find the SQ heavy enough so rather you than me lugging the 6x7 around 😊
awesome video Steve. Back in my wedding days I had 2 ETRS bodies and 1 ETRSi a 150mm 75mm and a 50mm plus 4 backs. 7 years ago I had a massive clear out of old kit, I only kept the ETRSi the 75 and 50mm plus 1 back.......I've just today loaded a 16 year old roll of Kodak Portra 160 not sure how the film will hold up but enjoying having a shoot. Cracking photos mate the shot at 15:00 is stunning top work mate.
I bet the images will come out fine Paul, not something I'd be willing to bet on with a modern camera in 20 years time.
Steve O'Nions get the photos back today the lab say as a ball park to half the iso for every ten years fingers crossed there will be something on there agreed tho my old film cams fell so solid compared to the digis but the main thing I’m enjoying is the simplicity no scrolling through endless menus no charging batteries just a hand held meter set the iso the speed and aperture then go make photos it’s quite liberating 📷✊🏻❤️🚐
Love the square format. There's nothing quite like the feel of a waist-level camera and the tiny click of a in-lens shutter. I'm pretty much married to the hassy 500c system and get shear enjoyment while using it in the field. There is something about shooting with a 60 year old camera that just feels so good. Also, I tried some of your composition techniques last year and had some good results. (my film developing needs improvement though) Thanks for a little insight.
Thank you. I did enjoy using my Hasselblad’s
Hi Steve, I've been through a similar process of trying to cut down equipment. With my Intrepid 4x5, I limited myself from the outset to just two lens, namely 90mm and 150mm. For my Mamiya RZ67, I have four film backs and four lenses - 50mm, 65mm, 110mm, and 180mm. I hardly ever carried more than three but I want to get that down to two. I may try either taking 50mm and 110mm, or 65mm and 180mm, depending upon the location and subject matter. I got rid of the prism awhile ago because of the weight and bulk - yes it is a a problem using the WLF with a high tripod position but you have to accept some compromises. I'm also planning to reduce to two film choices, namely FP4+ and Portra 400, so I'll never need more than two backs.
Good choices Kevin, slimming down the film stock is just as important in my opinion as it makes scene selection easier not to mention reducing the developing hassle later. BTW I enjoy your blog posts :)
really interesting! im keen to shoot some landscapes with medium format too! Very useful video! A Bronica SQAi might be added to the list haha
thanks Steve :-)
Thanks Gareth and I hope you manage a film shoot sometime soon.
Steve O'Nions Cheers mate. I’ll have a nose through your other vids soon 👍🏻😊
Hi Steve! Another great video, thank you.
Cheers Frank.
Lovely gear!, but I'm also trying to limit myself in the options and develop a workflow where I deal with the limitations, developing more the creativity. Besides using a 35mm Nikon system, I'm just barely starting with medium format film and have only a zoom for the Mamiya 645. Beautiful images and video Steve, thanks!!!!
I also use 35mm Nikon extensively alongside medium and large format, they all have their strengths. You are right to focus on the creativity, the camera is just an extension of that.
Yes, very enjoyable, I watched it all.
Nice ramble... both in the house and out in the field :). Have been interested to see what "you have in the bag" so thanks for that. Some nice images and your choice of lens didn't seem to inhibit you shooting - go with what you have at the time. When you mentioned mountains I did expect to see you up a mountain not on the beach mind :) Loved the image with Moelwyn Mawr & Moelwyn Bach in the background, it's a pity that peninsular does not open up a bit more to inc the iconic Cnicht in that view , which has a great angle to look at from that area. Do you take the Bronica up in the hills? Anyway, great vlog to watch on this wet n windy Sunday morning, thx.
Hi Alan. I went for the coast thanks to the forecast and good angle on the sunrise at this time of year. I have lugged a full Bronica outfit up mountains before but it get tiring as the day wears on and adds a lot of pressure on my knees during the descent.
I agree that the view could do with opening up a bit more but that’s something we are stuck with.
Great points. Love your work.
Hello Steve, I have just fallen over your channel in searches for film photography, great channel and I have sub’d. I mainly shoot an Ebony 4x5 but also have an ETRS. Out of interest, why did you exchange/sell the Hasselblad kit for the Bronica which is the same film format? Kind regards Graham.
Interestingly I’ve an upcoming video comparing the Hasselblad and Bronica 😊. The reason I no longer have the former is due to going digital (briefly) and selling it.
Hi Steve, I was wondering, why did you prefer the Bronica over the Hasselblad? Do you see any difference between the two when it comes to image quality?
Hi Jarmal. There’s little to choose between the Blad and Bronica but I sold the former in 2012 and when I got back into film I couldn’t afford to buy another one 😕. The Bronica is more modern and has some advantages in terms of electronically timed shutter speeds down to 16 seconds and tends to need less maintenance. On the other hand the Blad has a more extensive range of lenses and accessories and the likes of the 50mm Distagon CF FLE is superior to the equivalent 50mm Zenzanon. Overall I’d call it a draw but the Blad has the greater prestige and sadly a much higher price tag too.
@@SteveONions Ah check thank you fort he response! I was wondering if the Zeiss lenses in general might be superior than the Zenzanons, but it seems that can only be judged on a lens to lens basis.
Love your videos btw!
What a beautiful system you have. But how do you compare the Bronica lenses with the Zeiss ones for Hasselblad? Do they deliver comparable image quality?
It’s a close call with the lenses. The latter Zeiss lenses are all excellent, i was particularly impressed with the 50mm Distagon CF FLE which is a lot better than the equivalent Bronica. The other Bronica lenses I have are definitely on par with the Zeiss equivalents though.
I'm right there with you I have the 50mm S but it's going to get sold or traded for something for my GS-1 outfit. My favorites for the SQ system are the 80mm PS and 150mm PS and I carry those the most with an unmetered prism and two or three backs (although I have 5 backs). I got the waist level finder but I had the same issue as you with tripod height so I tend to just use the prism finder unless I'm shooting hand held walking around. I have the 65mm PS also which is a nice lens but it doesn't get used as much, I should get it out more really. I think ultimately I'll stick to 3 lenses for my SQAI and get rid of that 50mm S which I never have really loved. my GS-1 kit has the 65mm and 100mm PG lenses so far and I'm hoping to get a 150mm or 200mm PG as well and then call it a day on that kit too. It's fun to have a complete kit but often I go there and then stuff just collects dust so I'm trying to be more practical about my gear purchases .... that saved money can go to film.
I keep trying out different lens combinations with the Sq but like you I prefer the 80 and 150 overall. I have tried to love the 65 but it’s a hefty beast and it rarely comes out sadly.
Good video, thank you. But were only going to take one roll of Ektar?!
I think I only shot one roll 🤔
Nice interesting video and great photographs, One of the things I love about my Rolleiflex along with the weight is the lens choice is decided for me .
Less is best a lot of the time Harry.
Loved the look through your kit, nice collection, I've got SQai 2 backs 3 lenses (150 80 & 50 all PS) been after a prism for a while now.
Loved the bay curve image at 15:00
Thanks David.
At the end the 80mm is the only must have in the medium format.
comparing the 2 cameras, is the SQAi BODY much larger than the ETRSi?
I’m not sure to be honest, I’ve never held the ETRSi but I think the weight is quite similar.
I used a simple kit, one lens, a 50mm f4 Nikkor wide angle lens and a Bronica EC camera. Slik 88 tripod with a Linhof ball head.
My friend had the Bronica 50mm lens which wasn't sharp at all.
The Nikkor was incredibly crisp.
I’ve also got the 50mm Zenzanon S Neil and it definitely isn’t that sharp. The Zeiss 50mm CD FLE on the Blad is in a different league. The 40mm Zenzanon PS really does shine though.
hi Steve, considering if you have a choice between sq-a and sq-b, which would you go for? Thanks!
Tricky. Probably the SQ-A unless the B was a very late unused model - some are mint.
@@SteveONions Thanks mate!
That was a happy ramble....
😊
I was longing for a medium format system, but I couldn't decide on what I wanted.
My criteria were:
* Not Hasselblad expensive.
* MUST be fully mechanical, no reliance on electronics.
* I wanted a very wide angle on 6x6, a normal lens and a tele lens.
* I wanted the option to shoot 6x4.5
* I wanted a prism viewfinder as an option
* Ideally, common issues can be fixed at home myself
I chose the Bronica S2A, the 40mm, 75mm and 200mm Nikkor lenses, a 6x6 and 6x4.5 back and the prism finder as an option.
I looked at the SQAi too, it was a contender.
Hope the S2A works for you, a great set of lenses there.
Great video Steve but you're showing your age. I remember when you would have carried the entire kit up a mountain. NO, seriously. I liked your thought process on this one. It was good to hear your reasons for leaving out certain elements of the kit. It's going to be interesting to see how this develops. Nice shots also.
Stuff has started to creep back into the outfit already. I think the biggest savings are to be had in the tripod and vlogging gear.
You can't leave out the vlogging gear. How would we follow you.
Hi Steve, I have a similar setup with Mamiya 645. I started out with the 645 and acquired many of the same types of lenses (35, 45, 80, 150, and 180mm zoom lens). I typically haul 2 lenses 35 or 45mm + 150mm similar to you. I don’t use the prism finder. I prefer waist level and the weight is really high. Still All the men’s choices and film choices doesn’t get you away from the problem you outlined in the beginning. There is still something nice about the single lens and film choice and that simplicity.
I also had that lens line up when I shot with the M645 and typical just took 3 of them at a time. If I go with a single lens I prefer a camera with it built in such as a TLR or folder.
Steve O'Nions Exactly, I am on a business trip to US today and have my Rolleiflex for just that reason.
That's similar with my ETRS. My 55 rarely gets used but the 75 and 150 are regularly in use.
For a moment I thought you were going to ditch the tripod also!
I would have included the normal lens, but yes for the rest, I think making themed photoshoots like this is the way to go :)
That said I always bring a 35mm camera too for the snapshotting leisure I can't have with my Bronica!
You don't make detail photography? You have no macro rings or lenses.
Thank you for your great videos that I enjoy a lot. I especially like the rhythm and calm of those. Cheers!
Thanks Joel. I carry a small closeup lens for those rare occasions I need to get very close to the subject. I also carry 35mm on short trips but generally stick to one format at a time.
Once had a Mamiya RB67 with 5 lenses which was a good workout.
But nice video and photos, keep snapping!!
Just looking at an RB67 makes me feel tired.
lovely compositions!
If that had been me as soon as I finished recording the first bit I would have started sneaking stuff back in, because...well...maybe. I'm trying to build up my ETRSi system but I’m a long way behind you. I have considered getting another larger camera but the 645 gives me decent lenses and I've decided I want one good complete system much like yours.
I have the blue and black filter case and I love it.
Gorgeous images Steve, and a brilliant video and I found it all very interesting indeed and I think you’ve helped me with regard to future purchases.
Thanks Mark. I think 645 has more than enough image quality for most situations and it still quite portable. I just struggle with flipping the camera on its side for vertical shots.
Loved the first image
Cheers Martin.
I was surprised you left the prism viewfinder. I just don't know if I could shoot an upside down image and I hadn't even considered the additional height it provides above the tripod. I guess you get use to that over time? It seems it would be difficult to compose and focus. I love that format though. Great shots even with the houses.
I’ve ended up packing the prism finder again Philip, couldn’t manage without it.
Hi Steve, I am considering the 50mm PS rather than the S have you any experience of this lens? You say the S is not sharp, is it so bad that it is not worth looking at?
I’ve considered the PS version but everything I read tells me they are optically identical. The S has the convenient 67mm filter which is why I use it.
The lens is not as good as others in the range and I avoid f22 completely having done a set of tests. It is never pin sharp like the 80 and 150mm.
The 40mm PS is sharper overall and can be used at f/22 so despite the awkward 95mm filter thread I am using it more and more.
If you really need a good 50mm I’m afraid it has to be something like a Zeiss Distagon CF FLE but for that you’ll also need a Hasselblad 😕
@@SteveONions Thanks for the feedback Steve, I have gone for th 40mm S version, not sure it'll take filters though there appears to be a permanent petal Les hood attached. I'll see when it arrives later this week. I really enjoy your film stuff particularly the Bronica excursions.
I think you will be happy with it and the angle of view is still quite natural unlike extreme wide angles.
@@SteveONions It's about 23mm in FF terms which is wide enough for most stuff. Just not sure about the filters though.
@@SteveONions Hi Steve, I just thought you'd like to see my first shot with my new SQ-Ai I posted it here, realphotographersforum.com/forum/threads/medium-format-film-first-shot.24221/
couple of years old this video, did you do a follow up after trying the combination a few times?
I did a couple more trips with the outfit Neville but reverted back to the 50, 80, 150 lenses and also the prism finder. It’s barely any heavier if I just carry one back to be honest.
Gorgeous photos, as an inveterate adder of kit, I recognise the dilemma of what to take. I just wish I had a bearer!
I have a newbee question. I have Bronica ETRS with 50, 75 and 150mm. Will they be good (compatibile) for SQ body. ETRS is 4.5x6 format so, in theory, it should cover 6cm circle. But i have no way to check this (very little info on internet). Maybe, in future, i will buy SQ so having already good lenses would helped me a lot.
Hi Aleksander. Unfortunately the Bronica SQ and ETRS cannot share lenses so you would need to purchase new ones if you go for the Square format camera.
@@SteveONions :( bugger
Are your images strait out of the camera Steve,or have you scanned them and done a little bit of work to them ?Either way your images are stunning :)
Thank you. They are all manipulated as the scan I make produces a very flat result in order to maintain both shadow and highlight detail.
Great video Steve and some lovely images you got.
I'm thinking of starting out with large format having never tried it before.
I'm just wondering if you do your own developing or do you digitize your images in lightroom/photoshop.
I do my own developing and scan using an Epson v700 for digital and also enlarge in the darkroom.
Enjoying your videos and work. Curious what made you switch from Hasselblad to Bronica.
Hi David. It was an odd journey that started when I gave up the darkroom and film in 2012 due to suffering with chest problems and hypersensitivity to the chemicals. Just about everything was sold and I went digital but within 2 years I was totally dissatisfied with my photography which had deteriorated (and was still going south).
I decided I would try a hybrid workflow and rather than spend £3k on another Hasselblad setup I went with the Bronica which cost around £600 for the same spec. I’d say it was pretty much a draw when comparing the two systems , the Bronica being better regarding the electronic shutter (16 sec max and each lens totally accurate) whilst the Blad had a more compact body and importantly a superior 50mm (CF-FLE).
I can’t see me moving back to a Blad unless someone gave me one and I would miss a lot of the Bronica features but I really miss that 50mm.
@@SteveONions thanks for the reply. I bought a Bronica system about 10 years ago for not very much. It goes in and out of rotation for me so it's nice to see exceptional work being made with it.
Enjoyed watching this and the images are lovely as always. I am looking forward to seeing more of your minimalist trips. I also surprisingly found a prism finder essential when I take my Hasselblad - also helps as mine has the light meter integrated. In general I have been a huge fan of taking only one camera and one lens for my trips. If I am taking the Hasselblad I might add an extension tube or a teleconverter. After having done that for quite some time now and finding it so liberating and noticing that I usually go with the same focal length anyway, I finally decided to go really minimal with my whole camera set-up and am currently reducing it to my Sony RX1, my Hasselblad 2000 with only one lens, and my 4x5 with one lens (possibility for a second depending on the decision about my 8x10). Thanks for sharing your thoughts :-)
That’s a good collection of cameras Isabel, all capable of superb images.
I find that I can manage with fewer lenses as the format increases in size. I like a couple of zooms with Micro 4/3 and 3 primes ideally with the Bronica. I want to get down to two lenses with the 4x5 and probably stick with just one on the 8x10.
Steve O'Nions I think the advantage of LF is that you can really use some of the lenses on both formats. I have a 229 for the 4x5 and a 305 for the 8x10 but that would also be a lovely tele on the 4x5. It is easy for me as I prefer the normal to long focal lengths anyway, so no need for anything wide. Wishing you luck with the 'downsizing' of the Bronica collection ;-) I did that for my Hasselblad some years ago...from 7 lenses down to first 3, then 2 and finally just one. It is possible ;-)
Thanks Isabel, I hope to simplify things in the coming year.
Wonderful , as usual. What cable release do you use?
Thanks Daryl. I think the cable release here is made by Hama.
im looking at the bronica s2a...will all those lenses fit on that camera? can you also get the viewfinder for the s2a?? thanks
The lenses aren’t compatible unfortunately Norman. I’m not familiar with the S2a, it was the earlier generation model and very rare in the UK from what I’ve seen (never actually come across one in person). .
@@SteveONions i am curently using the bronica etrsi 645. do you think its worth it to upgrade for portraits??
norman tesch I would say no, there’s little difference unless you are a dedicated 6x6 shooter. The 645 format is almost perfect for portraits so I would stick with the ETRS.
Nice Vlog Steve
Hi , can you hel me please , I have Bronica sq-ai and it's new I try first test rool HP5 and images soft I mean not sharp eenaff, I think I have a problem incorrect fitted focusing glass, or any suggesting, can you make a video about this problem or help with explain how to fitted Focusing glass, thank you
Hi Roman and sorry to hear about the focussing screen. To determine if it is indeed the screen you could shoot a roll of film using the distance scales on the lens, one at infinity and other gradually closer. Shoot the same scenes using the focus screen and compare the sharpness. They should be the same and if not the screen and focus should be checked by a repairman.
Fascinating insight into film photography Steve. Really enjoyed watching you go through your gear and discuss the merits of your equipment. I really liked your image "Bay Curves" at 15:02. Beautifully simple with the leading line of the curve taking your eye up to the house in the distance. Great work Steve. :-)
Thanks Julian, it’s one of those locations that you can’t really go wrong with.
Great video. I’m curious what app you used for metering
Usually it is a dedicated Sekonic spot meter but also I’ll use MyLightMeter on the iPhone. .
Hi Steve. Interesting stuff. I guess we're all guilty of carrying too much kit, most of which rarely comes out of the bag. Your approach here is really logical and something we can all learn from ! You've produced a set of lovely images so I hope you feel the experiment worked. Very informative video Steve. Many thanks for sharing. P.S. That looks a cracking location - was it Anglesey?
Thanks Tim. The location is next to Porthmadog and very easy to get to, just a couple of minutes from a handy car park and lots of different viewpoints.
@@SteveONions Many thanks Steve. That's really helpful.
nice one and interesting too. is that camera a more modern version of the etrs version ?
Hi Robbie. It is from the same generation as the ETRS, just a 6x6 version.
@@SteveONions looks super i had the etrsi years ago the images were fab im getting back into film again just bought on flea bay a yashica fm with a ml yashica 50mm 1.4 lets see what that does, i need somewhere to develop BW here in austria but i might send it to blighty. im driving the wife nuts buying cameras. Keep up the good work.
Good luck with the Yashica Robbie.