Why We Don't Have Free Will - The Standard Argument | JJC Smart | Philosophy of Free Will | Argmnt 2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 24 окт 2024

Комментарии • 14

  • @retheeshradhakrishnan1545
    @retheeshradhakrishnan1545 Год назад +2

    We are here to experience life. Not for our wish. When I look back in my life I know each and everything wouldn't hv happened any other way how much I force to change something. That causes distress. So I'm free now knowing that I don't have free will. I'm silent now

  • @iiTzKaran_YT
    @iiTzKaran_YT Год назад +1

    Saw you in Gaurav's video, subscribed instantly!

  • @retheeshradhakrishnan1545
    @retheeshradhakrishnan1545 Год назад +1

    Most awaited video

  • @Boris29311
    @Boris29311 Год назад +1

    Believing in free will is necessary if you're playing a role with a lot of drama.Not only is free will a feeling based on not knowing what's going to happen and not knowing how life works but also a control mechanism.

  • @bgalbreath
    @bgalbreath Год назад +1

    Spinoza accounted for the appearance of free will epistemically. We are ignorant of most of the causes of our doing what we do, which results in our impression that what we do is not subject to causes outside our control. The more we learn about causes, the less free we seem to ourselves to be. If we ever could manage to understand all the causes that are operating, the impression of freedom would disappear (if we responded to the facts rationally).

  • @jaikalra1499
    @jaikalra1499 Год назад +1

    🤯🤯

  • @justinlloyd3
    @justinlloyd3 Год назад +1

    Go look up Dan Dennett. He will set you straight. Compatibalism is the only answer to free will. This nonesense we dont have free will needs to end. It is a terrible and dangerous idea.

    • @CuriosityGuy
      @CuriosityGuy  Год назад

      If you haven't, go listen to Sam Harris debating your Dan Dennett till the end and see who "sets whom straight". Watch Alex O' Connor and Gregg Caruso "set Dennett straight" too

    • @rhysjames5130
      @rhysjames5130 2 месяца назад

      @@CuriosityGuyLMAOO. Alex O’Connor isn’t a real philosopher, he’s a podcast host who makes incredibly simple and sensationalist videos. And Sam Harris is ridiculed by most neuroscientists for peddling junk science and ridiculed by many philosophers for having an incredibly rudimentary understanding of ontology. Compatibilism is far and away the most accepted position among REAL philosophers, and it’s the only definition of free will that makes sense. The only people who say “we don’t have free will and there’s no way you can provide a coherent definition for it” are people who don’t really understand philosophy.

  • @SwatiJha-sk6fl
    @SwatiJha-sk6fl Год назад +1

    First like, first cmnt 😅