Tesla Cybertruck Crash Test and Safety
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 5 фев 2025
- Note: the first clip is a Tesla Cybertruck vs 2023 Ram 1500 crew cab. Also the Cybertruck is full frontal crash testing while the 2023 Ram 1500 crew cab front moderate overlap crash testing.
The Tesla Cybertruck, known for its unique design and marketing promises, has recently been subjected to crash tests, revealing some concerns about its safety. The vehicle was claimed to be "bulletproof," "smash proof," and "crash proof" by Elon Musk in 2019. However, recent crash test footage, shared as part of the Cybertruck's official launch, shows the vehicle undergoing a full frontal crash at 35mph. The footage indicates that the Cybertruck, priced over $60,000, appears to bounce off surfaces it hits without much crumpling. This lack of crumpling has raised safety concerns, as crumpling in vehicles is crucial for absorbing shock from impacts, thereby protecting the occupants inside.
Concerns have been raised about the Cybertruck's design, suggesting that it could be dangerous for occupants in a crash due to its "indestructible" features, which might make it difficult to extract passengers after an accident.
In terms of rollover tests, Elon Musk claimed that the Cybertruck's low center of gravity prevents it from rolling over. This claim was supported by a video showing the vehicle in a rollover test at 16 mph, where it did not roll over. However, the absence of contextual information about the test conditions and comparisons with other vehicles makes it challenging to assess this claim fully. Additionally, the lack of detailed crash test performance data, such as dummy head deflections, means that conclusions about the Cybertruck's overall safety cannot be definitively drawn until organizations like the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety evaluate the vehicle. It's noteworthy that while previous Tesla models like the Model 3 and Model Y are IIHS Top Safety Picks, this does not automatically extend to the Cybertruck, given its fundamental differences from these models.
#TeslaCybertruckSafety
#CybertruckCrashTest
#ElectricVehicleSafety
Get More Great Car Videos - Subscribe: goo.gl/BSIaFc
Comparing a full frontal test (100%) overlap with a moderate overlap test is absolutely misleading.
Exactly, but minimalistic crumple cybertruck has means it will just kill the occupants everytime. Musk is a manchild moron who doesnt understand anything especially physics. People idolize him so much for no reason and just believe what he says and what he says is incredibly stupid all of the time. He is nothing but a trust fun kid born into riches and who got lucky investing, buying things off of other people and rides the honey train of it.
Yeah, full frontal is way easier.
@@mushroom032exactly
I like it! I think I’ll buy my mother in law one.
@@cjskelton7603 buy her two. Better to be safe
He said: "If you're ever in an argument with another car YOU will win"
When he really should have said: "If you're ever in an argument with another car, your CAR will win"
Yeah his fanboys think thats a good thing lmao
@@safakhan3088it's sociopathic and shows the truth behind Tesla drivers. They're deranged
@@safakhan3088 yeah, what an odd thing to say. We have these mammoth trucks on the road now and they're literally over 100% more likely than other kinds of cars to kill another driver in a collision. Totally something i'd expect to come out of his mouth though. Shouldn't even be allowed on the road. This car is dangerous.
The smart 2 will win even more.
But same as there, the occupants will find out if there actually is an afterlife at all...
crash test does NOT show the damage done to the dummies....WTF IS THE POINT THEN???
true, i'd rather survive than other car occupants
are you serious? do you know what is the use of crumple zones? it is to decrease the force for the passengers. The force on the dummies have to be enormous when even the rear suspension broke just by the impact without any use of crumple zones. This car is a serious risk on every street. Over 100 years of engineering in the car industry to make driving save and they dont give a shit, use another way just to have a special design and build a shitbox like this. We just had an deadly accident with someone who did things differently and ignored some rules of engeneering. This lead to 5 dead passengers in a submarine
@@patrickmessner are you sure the rear suspension broke? because this truck does have rear wheel steering so its rear wheels can actually move like that
All you need to do is watch the relative speeds and body angles of the crash test dummies in those two vehicles to see which vehicle does, and does not, protect its passengers from the worst effects of impact physics.
Hint: It ain't the Tesla.
@@satyrosphilbrucato9140 NO you are WRONG - you cannot conclude anything without analyzing the dummies themselves they contain devices that calculate force very accurately - only when they release those numbers can you determine if the car is safe or not - crash testing is a reliable science at this point
That's what a crash test failure looks like. The force on the vehicle was so hard it folded the rear steering. The crumple zones do not exist, and the passengers insides have turned in to a paste. But give it nice editing and it looks like a win. :D
Especially the "in the collision with another vehicle you will win". Bitch, this car weighs thrice as much as a normal car should, you're basically giving people a ram of death. Imagine how many children will fit in a blind zone under the bumper
If the Cybertruck collides with the Ram truck, the Ram truck is Cybertruck's crumple zone because the Ram truck will be crushed and sliced like a tin can by the Cybertruck.
@@hchchc22 yes but if you hit a wall you're dead
@@mranonyymuus If your Ram, F-150 or Silverado truck hits a Cybertruck, you're dead.
@@hchchc22 you say that as if you thought terrible crash safety was a good thing lol
I'm confused about the comparison to the Ram 1500 in the first clip - I'm not sure of the performance of the Ram in the test itself but:
1. Moderate overlap compared to a full frontal are two totally different tests, in which a full frontal typically crumples less
2. That looked like a good crumple zone for the Ram - passenger compartment was intact and the rest of the front end crumpled appropriately
I drive a Tesla Model Y and it's a highly rated car as far as safety goes, but I just don't see the same here with the Cybertruck
yes and the dodge hits foam boxes while the tesla hits steel.
@@ballsthatclank its not foam. Its honeycomb metal.
Indeed the first test is not comparable as for the ram it's hitzone is 1/3-1/2 width wise and half height wise
@@cLokki lol just stop it already. cybertruck is just too stiff, just look how bouncy it is after the first impact. that's deadly.
@@ady007pl What he is saying is that they need the 2 trucks to do the same test to get an actual idea of how they compare. This is like if I hit you with a 2x4 and I got hit with an orange and say I took the hit batter. Not a perfect comparison of course but hope you get the idea.
As a mechanical engineer with (129) years of experience in vehicle safety design and testing, I must say, I’ve never seen a modern vehicle as dangerous as this particular truck. It should most definitely not be allowed on public roads while it has that titanium exoskeleton profile. It’s a real threat to the people inside and outside of it. Every vehicle is dangerous to some extent, but this... well, yeah, it’s real bad.
And I drive a Tesla Model S LR, by the way... That being the polar opposite in terms of safety.
It's probably because actual engineers designed the Tesla, whereas a celebrity designed the Cybertruck
As an eng. with 29 years of experience in vehicle safety and testing I would have assumed you checked that you were looking at the correct specs before commenting.
A Prototype original concept had titanium... not the production version.
If you really have experience with "vehicle safety design" you probably noticed the crumple zones in the Cybertruck, that are the same as the Model Y. Front beam, crush cans and megacast. I guess you didn't search for it and based your conclusion on this video.
It should not be on the road just like your motorcycle. 😂
@@MKu64
"ultra-hard stainless-steel" is significantly harder (~200 GPa) versus titanium (~115 GPa),
so yes, then it's even less safe than I originally pointed out. Should have sticked with "titanium"...
@channel4ferrets
A singular detail or feature does not save a design from being outright dog-water.
Put simply, in this particular case, just look at the rear wheels during the moment of impact...
Don't need to have a fancy degree to see that the forces are clearly not being dissipated in a controlled manner!
@teslapower5461
Ok, you I'm letting off the hook, since you actually have a valid well thought out point.
Literal death trap
How specifically?
no crumple zone@@iidawgg
@@iidawggThe body does not crumple and, accordingly, does not extinguish the force of impact. So the passengers will take over all the inertia. It's like falling on concrete instead of a trampoline
Any other vehicle that’s not the cybertruck.
@@elbowbread4393 We saw the crumple zone in the front of the cyber truck in the video.
The Human takes the entire force of the crash, I like it.
Enjoy your side impact in your RAM.
Yup less Tesla geeks off the road 😊
@@SPL-6Much rather sit in the ram and not endure the forces in the tesla…
@@booxwee3804 For a side impact you want to be in a RAM than a Cybertruck? An easy Darwin award win for you!
@@SPL-6 See how the tesla doesnt move much? Yeah thats not a good thing
This thing will kill the people inside of it
It will save the people inside of it, since it’s an absolute tank of a vehicle.
Nope , it’s actually a bigger crumple zone with no engine, same with all the other Teslas that scored the highest safety ratings. That will save the occupants from harm.
@@starshipdriver8536 I don't think you understand how energy dissipation works... This looks like a crash test of a car from the 50s or 60s
@@Melanie16040 No it looks like a crash test of today, with a crumple zone doing its job.
@@starshipdriver8536 For one, the windshield completely shattered which did not happen to the ram (referring to the ram's full frontal crash test) but that would be forgivable except for the fact that car windshields are built to not have shards flying everywhere (aka a basic safety feature they've had for years). That sad excuse for a truck doesn't have a crumple zone that is up to par, just compare it to the crash happening right next to it. Being a tank of a vehicle is provably more dangerous for everyone involved in a crash. Also no side airbags I guess. Why would you make excuses for tesla when you could demand something better? You said that tesla usually scores high with these tests, hold them to that standard instead of ignoring actual issues.
Why does this video compare a full frontal impact on one vehicle with a partial overlap on another? Also, crumple zones on a vehicle are a good thing.
Not in america bigger and heavier = safe
@@matous2542 Yeah, rattling about in your big safe car like a table tennis ball in a paint tin is definitely the safe option.
@@matous2542 you know nothing about this subject, you are just either a Tesla investor or a Musk Fan
"it doesn't roll over"
*tests at a speed I do stops on my bike with* 16mph
*almost rolls over*
Bro when are you driving sideways
@@piersonhauser5760 when it rains sideways obviously.
However on that test - other vehicles roll over.
@@MKu64the test is for checking what happens with the car when it rolls over, not if the car will roll over at a certain speed. They haven't shown a roll over test here. "It doesn't roll over" then fucking make it that's the entire point aaaaaaaaa
This thing should be banned ASAP
The worst part is that the dummies that buy it will die in a crash but the damage this car will do to (MODERN) AND SAFE cars spits in the face of safe design of crumple zones and how cars have developed over the last 60 years
Point being,the buyer of a cybertruck may not care about their own safety however,it effectively destroys the idea of vehicle safety in general making it a direct threat to life for any other driver out there
This car .....clearly breaks many traffic and road laws and shouldn't be on any road,how the hell it passed regulations i have no idea,i guess being bullet proof is a bigger priority in good ole USA,doesnt matter how it looks and who cares about anyone else
First of all, you're a complete idiot. These two videos are totally different. The cyberjunk is hitting a full frontal wall and the ram is hitting a moderate overlap. Secondly, Tesla makes literally the safest cars in the world. That's a factual statement. The video of the F-150 lightning doing the same test as the cyber truck did is actually comparable because it hits a full frontal wall which the ram did not do in this video and they demonstrate a rollover test. The Ford performs the exact same way as the cyberjunk does in this video and for the rollover test when it gets hit, not the sliding at 15 mph, for the t-bone test, the Cyber truck doesn't even get lifted off the ground but the F-150 lightning does. So yeah just off of the test and how the full frontal is more extreme cyberjunk is the safest not to mention the fact that the front is at a lower angle which is a big reason why everybody's talking about the cyberjunk not being allowed in the UK because trucks that have a high front increase risk of injury to pedestrians whereas the cyber truck has one of the lowest. If not, the lowest which means it's actually safer
Always wanted to drive a coffin
Comparing a Telsa full barrier crash to another vehicle (RAM) performing a moderate overlap test is idiotic. The moderate overlap test the RAM is shown in is exponentially more demanding.
The 35 MPH full barrier (Tesla shown) crash is an archaic test . The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) have moved on to more real-world tests: the small overlap and moderate overlap. These are done at 40 MPH; that's approximately 35% more force than a test at 35 MPH. These two tests represent scenarios how cars crash in the real world and are much more challenging than an old fashioned (full) barrier crash. A full barrier crash is done by manufacturers because that is what the NHTSA/DOT requires. IIHS doesn't even do barrier tests any more as they are irrelevant compared to the results of overlaps tests. So the video Tesla released just proves they passed the bare government minimum testing to make a production vehicle.
Why are the overlap tests more demanding? A moderate overlap concentrates 100% of the crash on only 45% of the vehicles front structure; a small overlap test, on only 15% of the vehicle structure. It takes serious energy management engineering to pass these tests since only part of the car structure is available for energy management, compared to using the entire front of the car to absorb crash forces. For example, any late 1960's car will pass a full barrier test at 30 MPH with only seat belts. A moderate or small overlap test would tear such a car in two.
All manufacturers test for small and medium overlap in their own labs (plus a full barrier test at speed higher than 35 MPH) for their own purposes, but few release that footage. So manufacturers wait until IIHS (or Euro NCAP) does these tests as privately funded to accept their accolades or in many cases provide excuses (See the furor over the IIHS test of the Mercedes C class of 2012).
As for what is shown in the Tesla video, modern engineering requires a very stiff passenger compartment zone with advanced airbags working with progressive deforming zones optimized for the three types of crashed tests. So you should see little or no door or pillar deformation.
As for the rear seat passengers, a vehicle of this price range should have rear seat airbags. They rear wheel behavior? The thing has rear wheel steering, so either the steering mechanism broke or deformed, which meaningless to the result of the test.
If Tesla was truly proud of the Cyber Trucks crashworthiness, they would release video of their internal small and moderate overlap test results.
how can this be legal in eu. there is no way and there shouldnt be. Just rename Freedom Truck and keep that shit in the US.
Who in his same nind would buy an american pickup truck in EU? There are too few places to turn on this thing.
it's not legal in the eu. Pedestrian safety on frontal hit -- the front is too sharp
it's not legal in EU. Sharp edges are prohibited (needs to be round with a something like at least 2.4 mm radius). And I guess with a few pedestrians accidents and a good layer, this won't be allowed in the US as well.
What scares me the most is the side impact crash test . NO deformation of anything (to protect the battery front catching fire). All the energy goes to the people inside the car :(
@@LeMrGuimsNo crumple zone! Cybertruck tough! Other car crumple! (Read that in The Hulk's voice).
RIP the Cybertruck backseat passengers tho
Front ones dont have legs and cant open this stupid door😂
Why didn't they do an equal test and show it hitting the same object as the Ram did instead of a flat wall? Show what happens when a lower object only impact the wheels and misses the front end.
elon musk saying "and if you're ever in an argument with another car you will win" is sickening. this car should be illegal.
Yikes. CT crash looks very violent for the passengers. It looks overly rigid. Stopping faster meaning more G's for the passengers.
You crash in this thing and you will become mush
Hey, but "you will win"...
When they sell this thing after you hit something at 20MPH the money they make will pay for dumping your flash bag remains.
yeah, but the CT is hitting a bare wall, while the Ram is hitting a short white cushion that obviously deforms and crumples upon impact. The Ram got a free external crumple zone. We need to see direct comparisons of trucks doing the exact same test. Maybe CT does suck, but this isn't a good comparison.
@@stevew9041 That's a cement block, not a cushion; the "cushion" you're seeing is the _Ram_ crumpling and deforming as it hits the block, which is what it's supposed to do to protect the occupants. It's the NHTSA's standard test for a moderate-overlap collision, which is broadly considered more damaging and dangerous to occupants than even a full-frontal collision with a stationary wall.
The kid on the back seat got decapitated, but hey at least "you won".
Another Gas guzzler fanatic lying about the test results that he literally just watched ^
@@lanceanthony198 there are no results. What are the dummy injury values?
@@Ebbelwoyfrom the looks of it he didn't actually get decapitated but he did get folded in half.
Yh
@@REAL-UNKNOWN-SHINOBI Probably a Paraplegic or Quadriplegic after the crash.🤷
btw for people think somehow this is safe, It's not, because when the car is hitting the wall, the force is so strong it'll kill you.
Thats it! The Car legitematly becomes the wall and you crash into your own car.
yep, you can even see by the dummies, how they all immediatly just going full speed into a dashboard, its gonna have more harme then safety
Y'all are idiots. These two videos are misleading as the cyberjunk is hitting a full frontal wall and the ram is hitting an overlap. If you look at the F-150 lightning video that hits a wall, it literally does the same thing
How so? Did you see how much G's were pulled? Or are you just mindlessly hating it because it doesn't look like every other truck on the market?
This comment describes the Dunning kruger effect
Oh wow, this car has no safety, who would have thought, what a surprise, wow
oh yea it was you spitting blatant misinformation in the replies to other comments lol
Mark my words somebody gonna die with in 40 mph in the truck
wonder what the 15 MPH bumper test on a cyber truck will reveal??
Musk thinks he can omit consevation of energy
You think your crumble zones are a benefit in a fatal side impact.
Why on the first clip the cybertruck is doing a full front crash while the other car is doing a moderate overlap. Those are 2 different crashes and the other car has a good advantage
The cybertrucks crumple zones seem to be the passengers inside, I can't wait to see how badly this goes
“I can’t wait to see people get hurt” is crazy
that's pretty much with any truck performing a full frontal crash........
I noticed the side impact test was also cherry picked to show better results. Notice before impact that the wheels of the 3500 pound car are steered approx 45 degrees to lessen the impact force to the side of the cybertruck. Would like to see full side T bone impact with the wheels straight.
That's how this test is made for all cars tested.
What happened to the rear wheels in the full front crash? How did they hit the front of the wheel well in such a low speed impact 😳
The Cybertruck has rear wheel steering. So during impact, the rear wheels are essentially turning because of the force of impact.
@@WillSorel1that's not what happened here.
@@speterg2his explanation makes sense. Four wheel steering means rotation in the rear versus a straight axle rear end
Probably because there's an individual motor on each wheel instead of a unified shaft.
The control rods on the rear wheels got absolutely destroyed due to excessive g-force. Essentially, Cybertruck is built like a brick, and it has about as effective crumple zones as a brick.
Normal cars have crumple zones for a reason. If I was crashing into a solid wall like that id much rather be in the other truck
Yikes, frontal impact looks horrific! Why no rear or curtain airbags deployed?
I would guess there aren't any
Airbags are only deployed where needed usually, because they can also cause injuries themselves. (remember: they are inflated by an explosive charge). In a frontal Crash side Airbags dont help because you are not thrown sideways, and the rear Seats were not occupied in the Video so no need to deploy the airbags in the back either.
@@unitrader403 they are not deployed in the sideways collision either
@@unitrader403 There are countless videos of other cars doing the exact same crash test where all the airbags do deploy.
I guess we'll have to wait for the official NCAP results as everyone is just arguing about how it looks at the moment, and really the data is all that counts.
They are only deployed if needed. Tesla uses heaps of sensors to determine the size and weight of the passenger and their seating position to determine whether or not they trigger an airbag and how they trigger it. It not like a normal car where they just trigger all of them. They also will do updates as they gather more data from real world crashes so they get safer as time goes on
Dude.... if it isn't the car to absorb the impact energy; guess what? Your body will absorb it.
then look up how all the other trucks dont crumble on a full front test... the ram here is only hitting a third of his car... the tesla 100% cause full wall... stupid compare video
except it did.. 0:15
This comparison is pure disinformation because of the ridiculous FULL-WIDTH METAL WALL vs a normal partial overlap test for the ram.
The Tesla test was done by them. Not the NHTSA. I was looking for the government test. But they haven't. I wonder why. You can see that the test equipment is different. Obviously to help Tesla
No side airbags on the Tesla. Not good.
It does indeed have side curtain airbags, it just doesnt need it for a full offset frontal crash. Look...
1) in the video
2) at the post-crash Cybertrucks that were on a flatbed
Looks like they will need an airbag on the back side of the front seat for the cyber truck to save injuy for the rear occupant.
That is strange!
For those who don't know any vechicle crashing into a immovable object is terrifying regardless of vechicle size it is more worse than crahsing into a brick wall or a house.
This thing will never be allowed to enter the EU market just because it has a very high chance of killing pedestrians in a collision at very low speeds, and yes that's a thing here, cars are designed with that in mind as well.
Must be nice for that to be a consideration
If only someone remembered that car cumplind down is actually a good thing - it absorbs the energy of the crash...
Well in America laws of physics works differently😂
Enjoy your side impact.
I don’t see side window airbag deployment vs ice truck. Why?
Modern cars only deploy necessary airbags in order to keep them ready for a second impact.
Since it was full frontal, no side impact sensor triggered sideairbags
Did this guy really just brag with the result of THIS crash test? Oh dear...
Yes, and if you're saying that you obviously don't know anything about crash test, the cyberjunk is hitting a full-on wall in the ram is hitting a small overhead compare the cyberjunk to the F-150 test which actually hits a wall and the F-150 lightning is the exact same thing
Ahhh a video that shows 90% of youtubers are actually engineers with 30+ years in the business. You guys are hilarious. 😂
yeah i feel weird why they dont make company rather than stay in youtube talk like engineer
Moderate overlap compared to a full frontal? Why is that? Those are completely different tests. If you look at other full frontal tests of similar trucks, you can see that tesla did the same.
I think it would've made more sense to compare a 35 Mph Full-Overlap crash test of a Cybertruck to a 35 Mph Full-Overlap (not Moderate Overlap) crash test of an "equivalent" vehicle, like another EV truck. Not only is the Ram being tested in a different testing configuration, but it also doesn't have the added weight of a large EV battery. NHTSA has tested the F-150 Lightning in a 35 Mph Full-Overlap scenario and the comparison would be valid to compare the Tesla to the F-150 Lightning. (Price points aside)
You know what weight the Ram _does_ have? A pushrod V8 engine that was designed in the 1960s, which I promise you more than offsets the weight of an EV battery pack. Guess where it is in the truck? In the front, taking up the vast majority of space that could otherwise be used as a crumplezone. By all accounts, it should be more dangerous in _any_ frontal collision than a comparably-sized EV truck that can devote most or all of the space forward of the cabin to crash mitigation.
The moderate overlap crash is considered a _more_ dangerous and damaging crash than the full-frontal collision; if the Ram is coming off safer in moderate overlap than the Cybertruck is in full-frontal, that means the Ram would be even safer still in a full-frontal collision.
The comparison is lopsided in the Cybertruck's favor, and it still loses.
@@SigmAnalog Engines are located in the crumple zone and aren't going to prevent crumple zones existance.
@@randomcrashingfacility31 Compared to a car with _no_ engine in front?
@@SigmAnalog can perform better, same or worse. depends on the design.
@@randomcrashingfacility31 As can be seen in the crash test footage, yes...
Interesting how the barriers the two vehicles run into is completely different. No agenda here.
Definitely not a good comparsion, but Elon fakes stuff all the time too so...
When you look at the Cybertruck factory tours, you see it has mounting for crush cans, a front impact beam and a front megacast with crumple zone, just like the Model Y (only a little larger). There is a fully designed crumple zone in the Cybertruck. Instead of trusting me, look it up and compare.
I mean I literally just watched a crash test dummy absorb the full impact.
Fully designed is useless though if the crumple zone fails to crumple so badly, a 30 mph frontal collision breaks the rear suspension.
@Chrischi3TutorialLPs the crumple zone doesn't even touch the front trunk/cooler.
"Believe not your lying eyes"
The rear occupants died, they don't even have an airbag, the front occupants were very badly injured. This stainless steel box is a coffin.
Now we know why insurance on the Cybertruck is at least $4,000 a year. I'm not sure how Tesla expects to sell thousands of those trucks.
Because Elon could shit on a paper plate and his cultists would line up to buy it for thousands of bucks a plate.
You're just making numbers up and not to mention the fact that you'd literally have to be in an accident that's major for the cybertruck repair, unlike other cars or trucks
@@thehumanrebuildd Yeah, it also weighs 4 tons, is armored so well, if the Ukrainans got hold of it they would mount some machine guns and use it to storm russian trenches, and compensates for excessive armor by having no crumple zone. Not to mention how badly this thing will fuck you up if you're not in a car.
@@Chrischi3TutorialLPs ? That literally goes for any truck that can fuck you up. I love all of y'all. Dumbasses are complaining about the cyberjunk being deadly and y'all are complaining about the Ford F-150 lightning or the rivian or the Hummer which literally weighs 2 tons more than this and is literally bigger
If the truck going 20 or 30 mph if a person was in the truck he will be soup
Good job bro
What is the first one comparing? It’s different crash tests.
Why do a side impact at 38 mph? Someone blew a stop sign and smashed into my colorado at 25 mph and they had the rebuild the whole back end and replace a bed panel. Didn't have the truck for six months due to parts being on back order. Speaking of which how much does it cost to repair a Cybertruck and how much is insurance because of this?
it does not have side air bags?
I really want one. But bro! i don't want to die fr. Also he said it doesn't roll over, but at 16mph it almost did. If it was going 20 it probably would have.
It only goes so far until it rolls back on to it's wheels, it won't completely go on to the roof. It may look like if it was going a little faster that it would completely roll but it wouldn't, check the roll tests on the other teslas
@@matthewtants6025 So I did what you said.... The Model 3 and the Model X (only ones I watched) really were able to turtle themselves backup. Only thing is, why is this test at 16 mph on the Cybertruck? Clearly the Model X and 3 were subjected to worse in their tests. It seems so random even converted to KM/H it isn't a clean number. The only context that I can find on that is that the Ford Expedition rolled twice at 30 mph and rough energy calculator tells me that an object of equal mass has 3.5 times more energy to disburse at 30 mph vs 16 mph. I'm skeptical that Tesla wouldn't have shown us higher speeds if the end results were positive.
@@johnramsey2009 you are correct tbh, it's just weird. The whole release of the cybertruck just feels dodgy
I wouldn't trust all these armchair "engineers". Tesla is known for superior safety. Would be quite the surprise if CT fails miserably. It's the same engineers at work. I bet you 10 the CT will have excellent safety score, on par or better than the competitors. Put in an order if you like it, you'll have plenty of time to decide before they get to your spot in the line.
“it almost rolled over, it would have at 20mph” like you know the performance of this vehicle better than the people who designed and certified it 😂. How about you apply your atrophied brain
You could not pay me to ride in this thing.
Beim Frontalaufprall sind unterschiedliche Bedingungen zu sehen. Kein realer Vergleich!!!
yea this is VERY misleading to those who have zero clue about vehicle safety.
it’s quite clear to tell with the crashes of the cybertruck, they’re being gentle with it.
at higher speeds of a roll over crash, that thing will certainly roll over.
What’s wrong with you delusional people just casually making statements of fact about the physics of a vehicle that you have zero knowledge of just to argue with the official statements of the company that designed and tested it. Braindead behavior
You obviously haven't seen the t-bone video of a cyber truck and that of the F-150 lightning the cyber truck does not roll over. It doesn't even lift off the ground. The F-150 lifts off in almost completely rolls over
The most important comparison would be what's the difference in cost to repair?
look at how the rear wheels almost snap off... I bet this thing is going to have the offroad toughness of a toyota corolla.
They don't "snap off", it's just the steering rod that snaps.
@@channel4ferretsNo it’s more than that. The wheel doesn’t just snap forward, the camber changes too.
A control arm snapping like that means one of two things:
A.) That the control arm was weak, and if it was weak enough to snap from a FRONTAL collision, how the hell do you expect to tow with that thing?
B.) The force exerted on the suspension was so great that the control arm snapped, meaning the front crumple zones aren’t doing jack shit to slow the vehicle down.
Considering Elon designed the thing I’m willing to bet it’s both
@@2020_Hyundai_Prophecy_Concept The point is that the rear wheel shouldn’t be moving *at all* during a frontal collision. The Genesis G80, another electric car with rear wheel steering, did not exhibit any movement in the rear wheel like the Cybertruck does during a front moderate overlap crash test.
What this means is the crumple zone is not sufficient at slowing down the vehicle, which can prove fatal in a collision.
You can even see it in the test dummies. Notice how the front dummy hits the airbag and then slumps forward? That’s not supposed to happen; you’re supposed to bounce off the airbag.
That means that the force enacted on it was too much for the airbag to compensate, so if you were in place of that dummy, *you would be dead.*
You do not need hard data to figure this out, the video itself is evidence enough.
@@channel4ferrets there is no steering rod, buddy
@@chuck_norris The Cybertruck has rear wheel steering, so there are steering rods in the back, buddy.
Bro if you think you will crash any vehicle into a wall, then you need your drivers license revoked.
This car will kill many.
Like cars don't already kill many people
That A pillar looks absolutely lethal for pedestrians. This whole vehicle is an exercise in wrongness.
Were these tests carried out by the same testing company ?
@DPCars You must be joking right. Comparing a full frontal to a Moderate overlap.
LOBILLOS MUSICAL DE DURANGO…
wow who could've predicted that having the A pillar meet the nose of the vehicle would cause poor results from a front impact 🤯
Track id?
Oh, look - it also comes with impact-activated automatic interior decoration! 🤣
A beautiful crimson paint job!
The rear wheels clearly show the forces acting on the passengers.
Steering rod is a thin piece of metal, compared to the axle. The tires are heavy on the Cybertruck. It's not that surprising that it bends or breaks on impact.
@@channel4ferrets Human bones and especially organs are even more sensitive.
@@stg931You idiot he's saying that the cybertruck has steer by wire which means that the way that the wheel turned is not because the crash. That's just the function of it. If you look at the F-150 lightning it does the same thing
No, it doesn't. It does that because it is nearby wire so it doesn't have an axle
@@thehumanrebuildd Good luck inside your CrashTruck
Why are they comparing 2 different tests?
All the full frontal test look really similar, but sure use a moderate overlap.
Does the cybertruck not have any curtain or rear airbags for passengers?!
Even for a £100k pixelated mess, that's pretty wild.
Now way this metal deathbox on four wheels will ever be street legal in any country. Right, right? Americans?
So no crumple zones in the front so YOU absorbe the g-force...genius!
Can't wait for the Euro NCAP test. Although they probably won't allow this on European roads.
Rear wheel steering has existed for a long time already. Honda Prelude had it some 30 years ago. None of the other cars has had this much wheel movement for non impacted wheel in any crash test video I have seen. System Tesla is using has one electric motor in steering rack at the back. Either that setup went all the way to one side for wheel to move that much or something in that setup gave in permanently. Either way, this isn't good for steerability after the the crash. Not every crash ends straight into solid wall. Sometimes it is important to be able to steer after the impact to be able to prevent secondary impact. That wheel is totally useless for it and will in fact steer rear end to unpredictable direction.
Good luck steering in any car after your front steering rack is completely crushed by the impact.
In this instance I agree it's possible as the front wheels were crushed/moved that the computer was trying to turn the back wheels to assist in an "unplanned" turn haha - it is certainly not ideal but it is likely no worse than a standard car with an impact that hard.
Or to say it simply: ain't nobody gonna turn after that
Thats why people dont do crash tests with a tank 😂
Different type of test. And the axle didnt break. There is no rear axle
Can u show it more slowly please
Dang, a f150 rollover video would have been dope. Still a great video. Thank you.
I want to have the Cybertruck in Germany!
I wonder how good the pedestrian safety is with a cybertruck?
What happens in an *offset* crash at high speed (which are far more common and far more dangerous than head-on crashes)? I'm guessing, all those rigid, less-deformable panels will detach, and all those flat planes and sharp angles could intrude into the passenger cabin. It'll look like a Final Destination scene. 😱
That's called winning apparently 🤪
Looks like the Cybertruck doesn't have window curtain side airbags 🤔
Because the ford was in a moderate overlap test vs the cyber-truck at a full frontal crash it appeared that way, but is not so
Isn't the car rolling actually a good thing in a crash because it lessens the impact?
No, the passengers get tossed around in the car and ejected from the windows if they're not properly securred. You want the vehicle to gradually absorb the energy over time instead of passing it to the driver & passengers.
@@quyenluu7883 Yeah, that is what I mean. Instead of the car stoping instantly and destroying your organs, your car starts rolling.
@@itsgonnabeokay9341you're better off with the simply car sliding than rolling and dissipating energy that way.
@@itsgonnabeokay9341 And then you come to a stop rolled over and die because the car crushes you.
@@itsgonnabeokay9341 have you ever rolled a car before? It’s not fun. I’d much rather slide than tumble again
What a terrible video.
It should include the same tests, with slow mo AND high speed footage, as well as a little thing called CRASH TEST DATA.
People thinking Tesla, the brand that makes the safest vehicles, forgot everything all of a sudden. Wait for the official results and it will have 5 stars. I'd bet on it.
clearly not build by germans ... :D
No, German car makers still can't produce a car with 48 volt low-voltage system, ethernet, steer-by-wire and megacastings. But Tesla sent them the manual "how to built a 48 volt vehicle". And that's not even a joke.
@@channel4ferrets what is a " 48 volt low-voltage system " ? : )
As far as I know steer by wire is illegal in Germany because in the event of power failure you still have to have a mechanical connection enabling you to steer until you can stop the vehicle. @@channel4ferrets
For all the crap I usually give German automakers (almost exclusively about their more modern cars, to be fair), I can at least say with a degree of certainty they'd never let something _this_ awful come off the assembly line.
The best thing about this video is the retro music. I still reckon a Vovlo XC70 will protect me better than this plaything. :)
this is knowingly misinformation
Nice it has no crumple zones. Might as well drive a 52 Buick. It can be "recharged" in 5 minutes, it runs, easier to get serviced than a Tesla, costs half as much and you get all the benefits of Tesla's no-crumple technology. 😂
Why is there a comparison between two different tests? that demonstrates nothing
Musk says it's cheaper just to pay them out in stead of lawsuits
Any car will roll over when the conditions of force are met. 👀
If the energy of impact isn't deforming the metal, then it will deform the little squishy flesh bag inside...
That head dive and beck snap = sure death in a cyber truck
A 16mph roll over test…. What?
So thankful that this vehicle will never make it to Europe.
Honestly the ram did better. They compared 2 different tests and the overlap test is more damaging. But with the lack of crumple zones on the cybertruck everyone inside is now dead.
Edit: the g-forces are so severe even the rear wheels come forward. Also they only tested the rollover at 16mph? Isn't the standard for crash testing 45mph? Which also means in the comparison the ram was going faster
Really? You know this for a fact? You saw what G forces the dummies were submitted to? You know the results of the crash test?
@themonsterunderyourbed9408 its pretty obvious the ram absorbed more energy and therefore less was transferred to the dummies. You can tell by looking
@@dumbdemolition1012 The overlap test covers 1/3 of the front of the car, obviously it's going to seem less violent 🤦♂
if there are no crumple zones, why does the hood bend at 0:15 then? oh yeah must have been the wind, right?
Pedestrian killer 5000
A FULL FRONTAL IMPACT TEST VS OVERLAP TEST. These biased channels are getting out of control. Call me a tesla fan if you want to.
Honstely I think the Cybertruck is just a lost be of Musk. His task was, to proof that he can provide every, as stupid, senseless and idiotic product, and people would still buy ist, because it comes from Elon Musk.