The Case is Pretty Much Over: Akerman on Trump Trial
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 май 2024
- Nick Akerman, Former Assistant US Attorney and Former Watergate Prosecutor, shares his insight on if the appearance of Speaker Mike Johnson, Governor Doug Burgum, and other Republicans attending former President Trump's court hearing calls for a judge to remove them due to potentially intimidating to a witness. Akerman also talks about Michael Cohen's second day of testimony, and states that at this point the case is pretty much over. He speaks with Kailey Leinz and Joe Mathieu on Bloomberg's "Balance of Power."
--------
More on Bloomberg Television and Markets
Like this video? Subscribe and turn on notifications so you don't miss any videos from Bloomberg Markets & Finance: tinyurl.com/ysu5b8a9
Visit www.bloomberg.com for business news & analysis, up-to-the-minute market data, features, profiles and more.
Connect with Bloomberg Television on:
X: / bloombergtv
Facebook: / bloombergtelevision
Instagram: / bloombergtv
Connect with Bloomberg Business on:
X: / business
Facebook: / bloombergbusiness
Instagram: / bloombergbusiness
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@bloombergbusi...
Reddit: / bloomberg
LinkedIn: / bloomberg-news
More from Bloomberg:
Bloomberg Radio: / bloombergradio
Bloomberg Surveillance: / bsurveillance
Bloomberg Politics: / bpolitics
Bloomberg Originals: / bbgoriginals
Watch more on RUclips:
Bloomberg Technology: / @bloombergtechnology
Bloomberg Originals: / @business
Bloomberg Quicktake: / @bloombergquicktake
Bloomberg Espanol: / @bloomberg_espanol
Bloomberg Podcasts: / @bloombergpodcasts
Bloomberg doesn't like Trump. So they interview someone who doesn't like Trump. Great journalism, Bloomberg.
Jews don't like DJT...
Can't handle the truth?
Thanks, I wondered how it would go and now don’t have to bother watching garbage journalism.
Cohen’s Lawyer says that Cohen is lying. And this is the best you have to hate Trump with. Total Joke
And Fox News says the exact opposite.
OFC.....we can always depend on FOX to provide the anti-fact, pro-DJT perspective......afterall, that's what the MAGAs are hungry for.
Of course
You mean fox marketing network...
Faux Spews russian bot propaganda
Fox paid $750 million to settle out of court for systematically misleading their audience about voting machines.
Oh i see that he missed the 14 year old prankster in the phone trolling 😂😂 .
Everything the prosecution supposedly proved is not illegal.
Right, and that's why he was charged with false accounting and election interference, both crimes. Not to mention the campaign finance violations and fraudulent tax reporting.
Lock Trump up.
You probably haven't read the court transcripts and looked at the evidence. Another case in point is that if Biden had done the exact same thing, and the prosecution had the exact same evidence, you'd probably be rabid by now. Try thinking and acting INDEPENDENTLY. Until then, you live in Trump's lie.
Yeah it is.
He also 100M in taxes. So your forefathers were killed in his place in Nam and you are paying the taxes he should be paying. Doesn’t that piss you off? Surely you’re not such a sheep?
And what law was broken?
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
This guy doesn’t even speak to what the charges actually are. Charges need to be proven. No evidence presented to prove the actual charges.
The prosecution has the receipts. The documented proof. The hard evidence.
@@CherDavis-pk5sn It is not unlawful to pay for a NDA. Happens all the time. Trump paid this with personal funds, not campaign. So what is the crime?
@@CherDavis-pk5sn You guys leave in dreamland. Couldn't wish for better opponents.
@@CherDavis-pk5sn of what?
@@gavelbanger Falsifying business records in an effort to keep all of this quiet. Yes, that's a crime, even if you don't think so.
Of course, he has vendetta, who wouldn't when you goto prison for someone.
I know. That's just human nature.
Plus being put back in prison during COVID for writing a book exposing trump's crimes.
Nobody forces him to lie and cheat! And he wanted to be Attorney General and Trump didn't give it to him.
@@stopthecrazyguy9948 Cohen has legitimate beefs. Just because you despise a person doesn't mean you're lying. Definitely understand why Trump's attorneys are going down that road. The documents are contemporaneous. Maybe the jury will ignore all that evidence. The attorneys can't deny the documents.
@@stopthecrazyguy9948 Not just back in prison, they put him in solitary confinement.
I'm guessing the politicians were there to be visible to the jury members and Trump, not Cohen. Cohen isn't going to be intimidated.
But the jury might!
The jury was probably wondering, WTF? Why are there coup plotters in the court?
100@ImTheDudeMan471 ........ And many of them need PARDONS!
You mean until his lie about the phone call bit him in the ass, right?
They were there to audition for running mate to trump. And the thing is he will not choose anyone of them
Clones drinking the Kool-Aide 🫡‼️
That's all the suck ups that are hoping to score a cabinet position or cushy ambassador post at a close ally.
@@davidmccarthy6061 Exactly 💯‼️ 🫡
These people have no conscience, something needed to be classed as a
human being.
Like the sign behind them said, bootlickers. Part of a human centipede.
Akerman stil has not said what crime has been proven Trump committed? Prosecutors have not presented any evidence that Trump committed a crime. This whole trial is a joke. The DOJ said Trump committed no crime, hence we will not prosecute. The DA in the southern district of New York said the same thing. Plus the statues of limitation’s has expired, so how can a trial even be legal? We all know this is election interference. Biden needs all the help he can get.
What's the crime? Nothing
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
Election interference and falsifying accounts.
Altering business records illegally to hide the affairs prior to an election.
A snapshot of political villains! 😳
Why does it matter if they proved “Catch & kill”, “hush money’, etc. happened when it’s not illegal??
Were kangaroo courts ever about law or justice?
It was booked AFTER the election.
They’re saying that if he did it before, he’ll do it for this election. They haven’t even figured out what charge to throw at him yet
Because the utilization of the conspiracy to hide the info from the public before the election IS illegal.
"Real men respond to testimony by being sworn in and taking the stand in court. Oh...wait. Nevermind"
I wonder how big of a hissy fit tRump threw after reading this post from Stormy 😂😂😂
That was definitely a zinger.
"Real men don't use butt jokes when typing out a response. Childish" Must be why you have no idea how the criminal justice system works. You are a kid
@@PetePineda "Butt jokes"?? English is CLEARLY not your first language as I don't even know what you mean by "butt jokes". As for how the criminal justice system works.. pray tell what you mean as again, I have no idea what you are trying to say. That tRump is prohibited by the gag order to testify?
Lastly, "you are a kid"? That is your comeback?? Seriously???
You say that because your wife and stormey were in business together. Once your wife had her rotten teeth removed, she started to make a few dollars.
Stormy has provided us with solid evidence of DJT's moral and physical deficiencies, and both are found to be utterly disgusting at best.
A little prison detour on the road to hell. (It's a coming!)
Cope harder bud.
Is this guy clueless?
yes he has to be because I've read Cohen's testimony and in no way did he prove anything.
he is not only clueless he is delusional also .
What is the crime?
Denial
@@jimako6 Denial of what?
This aged like milk.
And fish
Trump knows more felons than a prison warden.
and every one of the sons of bitches should be in prison. Cohen and the ho bag, and every democrat that has lied, coerced, changed or withheld documents. The Jan 6th committee. Never in American history has so many lies been told about a presidential candidate. The good part is, he's going to kick the fuk out of joe Biden at election time.
Trumped up duds
Trump the assaulter of women (per a jury)
Trump brags about assaulting women (I grab them by the P - when you’re a star they let you get away with it)
Trump cheats on Melania when preggers or right after she gives birth to Barron with playboy bunny’s and porn stars.
American. Women. Stand. Against. Trump.
Yeah John Hillary Clinton al Sharpton
Trump cheated on every wife he ever had.
Cheated on Ivanna with Marla.
Cheated on Malta with Melania.
Cheated on pregnant Melania with a playboy bunny;
Cheated on Melania while she was home with baby Barron this time with a porn star.
America. Stands. Against. The. Cheater.
Akerman,If anything this is a Misdemeanor not a Felony You Quack..
It’s not up to the defense to prove a case it’s up to the prosecution Einstein. Reasonable doubt.
They love to turn things upside down, with a straight face. It's their greatest skill.
Nick Ackerman. Former Assistant Special Watergate Prosecutor. Is this the guy who suborned perjury from John Dean? The guy who had ex-parte meetings and communications with judge John Sirica? Who withheld from attorneys for Richard Nixon, Bob Haldeman, and Bob Erlichman the fact that John Dean kept changing his story? Who knew that John Dean was to be indicted for organizing the Watergate break-ins (there were at least two) but withheld the indictment when a new, political prosecutor decided to suborn perjury to Get Nixon? Well, at least Bloomberg didn't bring in John Dean himself as the expert on lawfare against a president. Thumbs down, for obvious reasons.
lol! You know, I lived through Nixon. His corruption effectively ended my childhood and I would dig him up to this day to prosecute his sorry self.
Now if you were versed in Watergate and Nixon, you would know that everything Orangesama bin Chaos has done makes Nixon look like a Choirboy
You really need to get some books.
And the crime is? Mr. Prosecutor, surely you can do better than that.
What is the crime?????????
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
Being Donald Trump....And wanting to make America Great Again!.....The left and most of the people commenting are insane TDS...
Your slowness is nobody else's fault but yours
Falsifying business records
So we are imprisoning a former president because of a disagreement on whether to classify an expense as a reimbursement or legal fee? Our justice system is two-tiered based on whether you bootlick for the authoritarian state or not.
So says Trump who has so much credibility!
@Just_Sayin959 that is not what Trump says, that is the case.
the case hasn't reached a verdict yet. and even if convicted, it's a separate question whether he would receive jail time.
What is clear, is that this isn't a disagreement with the classification of an expense, the evidence clearly shows the intent to hide a payment as a legal fee (grossing up). Whether the jury believes the prosecution has met it's burden of proof, is yet to be determined.
@@charlesborlase2238why does he need to hide it. An NDA is not illegal!!
@@jenny6253 why hide it? because he didn't want it to cost him votes prior to the 2016 election.
I still can’t figure out the crime
No crime needed in a kangaroo court.
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
@@NYyankeeboi Nailed it.
What crime is he being charged with? Have they said yet?
Mr Ackerman couldn't be more wrong.
...you are right.
Akerman turned out to be completely wrong as CROSS destroyed Cohen with his own lies.
Two questions ……………what crime has Donald Trump been charged with? nobody knows 4 weeks in. Secondly, if he shouldn’t have paid for it with personal funds and marked it as legal fees, you’re saying the opposite must be true. He should’ve used campaign funds
Sick people.
@@VisionClearly CROSSEYED YOU ON COHEN'S CROSS!
User your better judgement - Cohen's not on trial
He's a 🤡 🤡
This fellow is nuts, though he might reflect the jurors outlook. If O.J. can be found innocent anything is possible.
Especially when he was.
Having a New Your Jury is like having an all white jury in Alabama!!
O.J. was black.
TrumPuppets on parade.
Fox noise and the traitor chump’s dodo lackeys.
Snakes supporting a fellow snake. Shame on all of you swamp creatures.
Trump2034!
Biden is obama puppet
All dressed the same.
Cult Attire ??
The Nappy Gang.
Why not give Donny the " special treatment" of having cameras in the courtroom. He loves cameras right? That way he doesn't have to run out and LIE about what really happened inside the courtroom!!
Liberals didn't want the cameras so they can now control the narrative so blind lemmings such as yourself won't know the true facts.
The Judge banned cameras in the courtroom. He didn't want to help Trump.
LOL.
I'm hoping for a conviction and a very long sentence. I WANT him to be elected.
@@msimon6808 Wasn't the judge, it's the law.
With cameras we can watch him sleep
So if he goes to prison, does that mean he will be reelected? I don't get it.
But what--weeks into this case--is the second crime that resurrects the book entry charge and raises this to the level of felony??
Oh, look! Four men in cheap blue suits, and silly, red ties. Cute!
@ardentynekent2099, At least they're not wearing the U.S. flag as clothing like Trump supporters, as if that makes them patriots instead of the insurrectionists they are.
At least look like honest observers.
Those are not cheap suits. I'm guessing the only suit you have ever come into contact with is cargo shorts and a Limp Bizkit t-shirt. Nick Akerman is wearing a quality jacket. That suit likely cost him $2000. The linen shirt and silk tie, probably another $500. Akerman has been around for a long time, and is highly respected on both sides of the aisle. You're trying to poke stupid holes in a cinderblock wall that doesn't care if you exist.
you do dumb better than the orange turd.
@@BrandonOsborn404I trust you know the number 1 from the number 4. You don't need a number theory class for that.
Akerman says Trump is guilty because he's guilty. Seems like a causation fallicy...
Seems like the truth.
@@stopthecrazyguy9948 Is that what your feelings tell you?
If your a witness giving testimony why does it matter if you want to see the defendant convicted. At the end of the day it's the evidence that convicts not what the witness wants.
Trials are won during jury selection. Evidence is irrelevant.
Because a biased witness is motivated to lie, which is what is happening with Cohen.
I didnt hear a single crime in his breakdown of the evidence.
This case is absolutely dependent on the theory that writing “legal expenses” on a disclosure was both incorrect accounting (according to the federal election commission its not) and that trump directed it, AND that trump did this in 2017 specifically to effect the outcome of an election that had already occurred.
Any attempt to describe the evidence in ways that dont address at least one of those points is gaslighting. There never was any controversy over the hush money payments themselves. This case rests on the legal argument that a book keeping entry in 2017 was done to influence the outcome of the election in 2016.
I'm sure Big Don will clear all this up when he testifies next week.....oh wait, that's right, can't put a Big Liar on the stand....too funny
They already did, Cohen!!
Trump is too dumb to put on the stand.
@@hollayevladimiroff131 Weak comeback. Cohen found his cojones. tRump?.....not so much....he'll never testify.
@@hollayevladimiroff131 He lied to protect Trump when he still thought Trump had his back.
Now he’s lying when he thinks the DNC has his back. Lol
Rats will eat their own leg to get off a sticky trap.
Huh? The defense has no theory? the prosecution has proved nothing! The NDA is legal. You’re a lawyer??
Are you a lawyer?
@leighg9274……Akerman is a joke. Of course NDA’s are legal. Does he not know this? His TDS is making him insane. Akerman should know if the witness, Michael Cohen is an admitted perjurer, it crushes the prosecutions case. Still….what crime has been proven?????
"the prosecution has proved nothing!" Huh? No see, no hear, therefore you better shut your chops as well.
@michelebella677 Does he have to be? Allan Dershowitz, a lawyer and Harvard law professor, says this case is bs and lawfare from the jump. So will his credentials suffice?
Kind of blows a hole in that right wing media nonsense, doesn’t it?
So, what is the crime committed by Trump?
What about the idea that no actual crime was committed? Does that carry any weight?
That's the defence's contention.
Democrats don't care that there was no crime committed. They want Trump found guilty of something, even if it is a fake crime.
Truth carries no weight as far as the establishment and its drones are concerned
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
Just because you bury your head in the sand and refuse to acknowledge the documents in evidence, the timeline of calls and actions, and supporting incriminating testimony doesn't make the case the made up fantasy you wish for.
Nick talked about the "theory of the case". The prosecution hasn't disclosed to ANYONE what the underlying "felony" is. How can you have a prosecutorial "theory of the case" without an underlying criminal charge? The only prosecution "theory of the case" is "orange man bad"; let's hope we can find 12 people in overwhelmingly blue NYC with severe TDS to convict him, which, of course, will be thrown out on appeal.
Dream on. There is no way Trump walks on this one. He's guilty as hell and everyone knows it.
@@maryegarcia2432 guilty of what crime?
Geez you people aren't following the trial. Look up the charges against Trump. It's easy on Google search 🙄
@@bessforman1773'TRUMP is charged in a New York State Supreme Court indictment with 34 counts of Falsifying Business Records in the First Degree."
Falsifying business records
THE MAN CONTINUES TO CALL ME A LIAR!!! I had to admit to Lying and to Criminal Acts which we did together!!! I went to Jail!!! And, I must not admit to saying he should go to Jail??? Wow!!!
Please specify the crime. I’ll wait
My question: WHAT IS THE CRIME?
Can Mr. Akerman tell us how Cohen supported the specific charges?
The paper trail supported the charges.
@@rathertiredofthemess2841 paper trail = Cohen?
Trump in clink by end of June then ????
For what?
That's President Trump to you!
"What they do with him on cross, at this point, is almost irrelevant." Haha. This was obviously recorded before Cohen's testimony on Thursday.
What a difference a day makes.
Brilliant prosecution. Enfeebled defense. There is no defense for Trump. 34 counts times five years each is the appropriate sentence for Trump.
Provide some proof then?
@@DingleDangle66
There are scans of checks that Trump signed with his signature of the payments made to Cohen.
Feels like the Mueller case. Remember that?
@@1happylandlord How disingenuous. The report said that he committed crimes but they couldn't charge him because he was a sitting president. This is an actual trial not an investigation.
@@DingleDangle66 Documents, notes, cheques, recorded audio, witnesses who worked with Trump. There is loads of proof backed up by undeniable evidence. You can see it all online. Trump has no defence. I hope he gets sent to prison but I doubt it.
But what’s the crime that Bragg has jurisdiction to pursue? NDAs are not illegal.
True, but falsifying documents is, then add other crimes on top of that and it's a felony.
I've known him to be a lifetime criminal/conman/grifter pos for 40+ years. Now add rapist to the list.
Boggles the mind that people would actually vote for the idiot. Brain worms?
Nobody is saying they are.
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
@@nerdyali4154 Tell him, the crime is Trump running again. If he goes away so do all the indictments because there all BS.
@@nerdyali4154What's the crime?
This group is going to be horrified a year from now when they see these pictures.
I was thinking the same thing about the people at his rallies who were wearing Donald diapers over their pants and wearing the "Real Men Wear Diapers" t-shirts.
Not going to mention the crime charged?
Trump’s Casa Nostra is more like an outhouse!💩💩
Von Shitzinpantz.
Take your foul TDS and shove it you know where.
Does anybody know what he's guilty of? I thought contracts were legal?
Three cheers for Nick! [Retired Psychologist]
"Hi Everybody, I'm Dr. Nick!"
The word defense is pronounced with accent on second syllable. NOT DEfence
.
Yea the case should have already been over, cause they have nothing connecting him to any crime!! PERIOD!!
this is political from start to finish.
It would be the exact same way of any Dem had done it, except much more rabidly pursued and prosecuted. Just imagine Obama or Biden 1) lying over 30K times, 2) having 10+ people within their personal/political organization CONVICTED/offering PLEA DEALS, 3) making private side deals with foreign powers while in office, 4) calling a bunch of Brown and Black people to the Capital and then they ransack it after the speech, and 5) giving campaign jobs to people who were previously CONVICTED - and you later pardoned. We probably would have seen the death penalty for TREASON if the Biblical GOP had gotten hold of it. Problem now is, they've twisted it AGAIN, so these very same Biblical people are supporting an adulterous sexual assailant who is anti-Constitutional and anti-law & order while claiming he is going to drain the swamp. It's just a massive three-card Monte, and there are literally millions of Americans paying/losing their hard-earned cash to support someone and (now even) a party all in on fleecing them while blaming everyone else. I've stopped myself from laughing to hard, because I'm not quite ready to die.... even if laughing.
The problem with the lawyer is that the question is whether the prosecution proved that there was a criminal intent to further another felony. Hush money happened. It was documented. That is a misdemeanor. Did that further another crime? Even if it was a campaign finance violation, was the campaign finance violation purposefully and fraudulently concealed. I don't think so. Because this is an all or nothing case, he can be found innocent of the felony and guilty of the misdemeanor due to the statue of limitations, I think this case is over.
If felonies don't fit. You have to acquit.
I can’t believe! This is still being talked about! This is so dumb
So you agree with Fake News and pornstars?
It's Historical. The first former US President almost a convicted felon. It's huge.
They’re starting to wear uniforms
It's a really creepy cult of personality. I can't wait until they all glob on face bronzer and bleach their hair.
Americas best on display, thanks for the laughs America 😆
So i guess this means no one can pay hush money to anyone anymore. The Politicians should all be really really afraid. What more there is no statute of limitations, anymore.
hush money payments are fine and dandy. Just don't create fraudulent business records while you do it.
As it turned out, Thursday was devastating for the prosecution
What is the crime? They are very hard up if they have to use Cohn, he is a total liar.
laffin at this comment. Hard up? Cohen is at the center of this cheeto's efforts to keep this information from the public. Get a grip. change the channel
"Accomplished" witness??? Put the pipe down dude!!
How much did this trial cost New Yorkers 🤔
The problem for the Defense is that their client is guilty AF, supported by lots of corroborated documentary evidence. Their only hope is a rogue hold out juror.
Clowns like you come out of your coma only to mumble some stupid statement. You deserve Pinocchio Joe Bribem.
Ok Mr bigshot. Guilty of WHAT exactly? Because the prosecutor has yet to tell the defendant! LOL This is 1000% another scheme by corrupt Democrats of election interference with Trump running for office.
So do tell us...WHAT are the charges?? Hmmmmm?
Can you name the crime? So far none of the witnesses have.
Hillary Clinton was guilty, that’s why the FEC fined her $105,000. Can you please tell me why she is not in jail? “The FEC concluded that the Clinton campaign and DNC misreported the money that funded the Steele dossier, masking it as "legal services" and "legal and compliance consulting" instead of opposition research.” Maybe you haven’t heard about that one since the leftist lame stream media doesn’t report on their own.
@msimon6808 ~ Witnesses don't have to "name the crime." That's up to the prosecution.
First, it is interesting to hear a legal analyst state that the case is over before the defence has put on their case. It is an admission that this is a kangaroo court. Several things baffle me. 1) non-disclosure agreements are perfectly legal. You can call them "hush money", but that is not their legal term. 2) Calling a legal fee a legal fee is not illegal. 3) Why does a lower court have the standing to prosecute a case that clearly is Federal in nature? Why does Ney York have the right to impact the election for all states? This is clearly Machiavellian political drama at its highest. Did Stormy accept the money? Did she agree to shut her mouth? Did Cohen agree to a attorney/ client agreement? So why is Trump on trial and not Stormy and Cohen? Cheers
Nice try. Your argument falls flat. The case in court is legitimate. Face the facts, your cult leader is guilty.
@@k311ydcart3r explain why it's legitimate
The cover up of the ‘catch and kill’ by not register the transaction of money (for the catch and kill) correcly. But let his advocaat pay the bill and than pays the advocaat back under ‘legal expenses’
This is how i understand the whole thing
It’s amazing how his defenders always defend him against a thing that isn’t being charged. It’s like they don’t hear anything that didn’t come straight from a trump aligned outlet. You can barely differentiate the bots from the fools because they use the same talking points.
Nailed it.
Mr. Akerman; you are so wrong and obviously a very bad lawyer.
Is this guy serious? Exactly what crime do these documents support? We still don't know.
We blacks for biden over here 💙🇱🇷🇱🇷💙💙🇱🇷🇱🇷💙💙
As Biden said "If you ain't for me, then you ain't black".
When will you wake up to how the Dems screw you over?
Make sure you vote for Biden so you stay black.
Yeah, Biden's done so much for blacks in Chicago and NYC and St. Louis, right? More crime, more inflation, more illegals to take their jobs. And you keep voting stupid expecting better results? Get off the left-wing plantation. Mike Tyson is for Trump. Real blacks who can think are for Trump.
All men for Biden… the rest are eunuchs 😂
I have always admired Akerman.
Wish the Democratic judge was fair and let Trump speak-surely as a defendant in a criminal trial,he has more rights than anyone,via First Amendment,to defend himself.
I would be more intimidated as a juror.
What is the crime? Is it worth spending $30 million on a trial about $130,000.
The real crime is election interference.
falsifying New York business records in order to conceal damaging information and unlawful activity from American voters before and after the 2016 election.
The crime is fraudulently using campaign funds in this matter
Oh , you think this is about the amount vs court room costs ? You poor child , this is about crimes ! So keep your head in the sand if it helps you sleep while the courts deal with the real world ! 😂
@@dral9657spoken like a true narcissist.
It's not about what Cohen said or even did it's about what he did for Trump and there is a direct line from Trump to Stormy. Case closed.
The problem for the prosecuiion in this case is they have proven no crime. All the jury heard was the testimomy of a whore/porn star, and a serial liar, perjurer Michael Cohen.
you mean direct lie?
*The problem for the prosecuiion in this case is they have proven no crime.* *All the jury heard was the testimomy of a whore/porn star, and a serial liar, perjurer Michael Cohen.*
He never said what the crime was.
After this interview some people in white coats came to take Akerman back to his room in the nursing home.
I really want to believe Nick is right!!!
I think this former Nixon prosecutor knows what he's talking about.
Why does MIT Romney think trump schould be pardoned . unbelievable why none of the rest of us can be pardoned. Biden 24 🇺🇸
Right. Maybe if Nixon hadn't been pardoned and, instead, charged and tried back in '74, Donald may have not run for president at all.
Both Romney and Biden are blockheads.
I wonder when they're going to get to Hunters laptop It's been so long
@@tharblin what for ? Fake news trying to make him look bad that's maga bad.
I’m no fan of Mitt but he is trying to salvage what’s left of the republic.
Why don't you interview Robert Costello about this lawsuit?
That didn't age very well.
Those clowns intimidating? Ha ha ha
Look at those fools with their little red ties! Hysterical!
Navy blue suit with a red / blue tie is east coast standard. Wtf is that all you have? Lol 🤣 interlectual lightweight
Yeah, new acappella boy band:
The Four Treasons
*LOL @ "little red ties" 😂😂😂😂*
@@KristalovesTrump little red ties caught red handed - kiss the tRump with love...
little red cub scouts..pitiful slathering lick spittle fascist zombies.
Life long GOP for Biden............vote democracy
vote democracy, lawfare, and corrupt courts.
Thank the Maker I'm an American and not a Democrat.
No real GOP would vote for Biden with his open border policy
@@msimon6808 Not real bright are ya ?
You are a life long Democrat pretending to be a Republican for Biden. I see that all the time here, because you think saying that gives you credibility. It doesn't.
Well if you think trying to jail your political opponents is democratic you need help!!
This has aged very very poorly in a remarkably short amount of time.
It seems like it would be hard to have. Theory of the case when they won't tell the defense with what Trump is charged
💯💯💯
What is the frikkin' crime?
Election interference and falsifying accounts.
you're not paying attention
@@aankwenti So enlighten me.
Falsifying business records
@@nathanlillie5262 How so?
Not with a dem jury and judge
Hey Nick does it matter I'd both are proven liers😅. Not in this currupt court room. They don't have a defence against the charges, cause we don't even know what charges are. This guy is currupt and eventually it will be obvious to everyone😢
Micheal brought receipts thats strong 💙🇱🇷🇱🇷💙💙
Michael is the icing on the cake!
Michael Cohen is the icing on the cake. Thank you
Receipts for nothing illegal. Dohhhhhh!
There is NO crime. NOTHINGBURGER.
Oh, there's a crime...It's called election interference.
I think , I imply & I submit the National Esquire !
🤷♀️
Thus guy not been in courtroom. Ugh
He says A. Fox says B
Talk to people in the courtroom!
Someone has been drinking the Kool-Aid.
You think so? lol
Exactly, what Akerman said is very true. This case should be an open shut case because the evidence, facts and documents presented by the prosecutors were so clear cut proving Trump is guilty of the crimes he committed that whatever the defence has tried to do so far has no relevance to the case. Trying to point out Cohen's past and trying to paint Cohen as a liar or whatever has nothing to do with the case because the evidence,documents and facts provided in this case only matters. Cohen's past is not on trial. The defence has not been able to refute any of the evidence provided as they've all been backed up by documents, video conversations , witness Pecker, etc.. Trying to discredit Cohen does not change the facts and evidence in the case.
You really are angry at Trump.
"Guilty of the crimes he committed"
Which were what exactly?
But is that finance violation?
Mr. Ackerman everything you mentioned is completely legal. You're being foolish.