Thank you for the explanation. I have been frustrated with the "made up" and confusing language by the creators of this software. After using CAD for some 35 years, I am of the opinion that some Autodesk manager went to his subordinates and told them to reinvent the wheel. They have made things far more complicated with names and icons.
I've been a Fusion 360 user from the start. This is the best explanation of what is really needed. Been doing it wrong all these years, getting lost modifying parts in assemblies. Much better than the 'experts' method. Thank you.
Ive come to a simular conclusion after struggling to maintain a clean timeline in order to make changes in complex designs. I like the nameing convention you use and I wish I saw this video earlier.
Fantastic tutorial, thanks very much. How the hell they came up with the word component, just blows me away. You've saved me a lot of confusion and frustration.
Thanks for the fresh rethinking of the Fusion basics and also illustrating a good organizational habit to make "New Component" before starting on a part. 👍
Great Tutorial thanks, I'm only new to Fusion 360 but I'm glad I found this before I developed too many bad habits. This gives the design a great structure.
Thx James, keep in mind you don't need to name the part inside the part folder, the only time you need to name the part inside the folder is if you are using Mastercam. Mastercam picks up the name of the part, not the part folder. Watch this video to see how I do it.. ruclips.net/video/mHhmoulky6Q/видео.html
![Master Autodesk Fusion: Understanding Bodies vs Components [UPDATED!!]](/img/1.gif)
Very clear, thank you
You're Welcome!
Thank you for the explanation. I have been frustrated with the "made up" and confusing language by the creators of this software. After using CAD for some 35 years, I am of the opinion that some Autodesk manager went to his subordinates and told them to reinvent the wheel. They have made things far more complicated with names and icons.
You're Welcome!
Great explanation. Now I understand it much better. Thanks a lot 😀
You're welcome!
@paramtrx Your logic is...well, logical. Thanks for your view on this. I agree with it and I will try to adapt it.
You're Welcome! Thanks for the comment.. LLAP!
10/10 explanation. I watched several videos before this, and this is the only one that made sense, thank you :)
You're welcome!
I've been a Fusion 360 user from the start. This is the best explanation of what is really needed. Been doing it wrong all these years, getting lost modifying parts in assemblies. Much better than the 'experts' method. Thank you.
You're welcome!
Ive come to a simular conclusion after struggling to maintain a clean timeline in order to make changes in complex designs. I like the nameing convention you use and I wish I saw this video earlier.
Thanks!
Fantastic tutorial, thanks very much. How the hell they came up with the word component, just blows me away. You've saved me a lot of confusion and frustration.
You're welcome!
I'm a beginner to Fusion360 and already confused about these terms. Thanks, this helps me understand what is going on.
You're welcome!
This video was a great help to me. I didn't realize how much so until I tried your suggestion, but now I'm a believer. And a new subscriber.
Awesome Thanks!
Thanks for the fresh rethinking of the Fusion basics and also illustrating a good organizational habit to make "New Component" before starting on a part. 👍
You're welcome, have fun with it!
Thanks! This helps me, as a new Fusion user, quite a bit. Looks like you didn't continue on with these videos which is kind of a shame. Thanks again!
You're welcome!
Great Tutorial thanks, I'm only new to Fusion 360 but I'm glad I found this before I developed too many bad habits. This gives the design a great structure.
You're welcome! I appreciate your comment Paul, Thx!
Thank you for this video and great information!
You're welcome! Thanks for the comment Karen!
Great Job! Straight to the Point!
Thanks!
Good terms of reference, I learned some more ,thanks
You're Welcome!
Excellent explanation!
Thanks!
some other software must be using "part" so they had to be different. I do like what you're saying (I'm still getting used to naming everything)
Thx James, keep in mind you don't need to name the part inside the part folder, the only time you need to name the part inside the folder is if you are using Mastercam. Mastercam picks up the name of the part, not the part folder. Watch this video to see how I do it.. ruclips.net/video/mHhmoulky6Q/видео.html