*No Muslim knows whether Allah is a Trinity or not* tell us! Is Allah a being of 0 persons like a pencil! tell us! Is Allah a being of one person like a man! tell us! Is Allah a being of several persons? Bet you say you don't know = your statements are just empty claims!
@@Hannestv4607 Allah swt is not human and not trinity. He is made of light. QURAN SURAH AN NUR :35 35. “Allah is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The similitude of His light is as a niche wherein is a lamp. The lamp is in a glass. The glass is as it were a glittering star, lit from a blessed olive-tree, neither of the East nor of the West, whose oil would almost glow forth (of itself) though no fire touched it. Light upon light, Allah guides unto His Light whom He pleases, and Allah sets forth similitudes for mankind, and Allah is All-Aware of all things.” And not like a pencil, the creator is not like his creation. Hope that answers your question. Feel free to ask more questions, islam promotes using logic and not following blindly. Also islam has the answers to every question.
@@jesbinjohn4006 are these three entities dependant on each other? If answer YES then how can the creator be dependent AND BE GOD at the same time? If answer NO then why did Jesus ask father for help? Hmm
The only thing Muslims can say is "Allah is One!" So no one can say how many persons or hypostases Allah consists of! 0 or 1 or more nobody knows! no muslim knows whether Allah is a trinity or not!
All the people who follow the Bible never read the book and never try to understand it. Clearly, the Bible states that women should cover their hair (i.e., wearing a hijab), should not drink alcohol, should not eat pork, should not fornicate, should not commit adultery, should worship God by prostrating. Yet, from what I know and see, Christians clearly oppose these teachings of the Bible. What is this? Do I need to be an idiot to be a Christian?
This guy said Matthew never met Jesus ? Matthew was working as a tax collector at a tax booth when he met Jesus. The gospel explains that Jesus simply said, ''Follow me,'' and Matthew immediately decided to follow him and be a disciple.
None of them met Jesus lmao! Bible is based on unknown writers.. so if i tell u i piss purple fruitjuice u have to believe it as well since im an unknown author of this comment ❤
Please, do tell me which Biblical scholars say those writers knew Jesus. For some reason, many Christians can often tell people they don't know what they're talking about but can never actually offer any proof otherwise. I've been asking for years. None has been provided yet. I welcome those names and quotes from you@@HerrHamzus
@@HerrHamzus Bishop Faustus: “It is certain that the New Testament was not written by Christ himself, nor by his apostles, but a long while after them, by some unknown persons, who, lest they should not be credited when they wrote of affairs they were little acquainted with, affixed to their works the names of the apostles, or of such as were supposed to have been their companions, asserting that what they had written themselves, was written according to these persons to whom they ascribed it .” (Faust, lib. 2. Quoted by Rev. R. Taylor: Diegesis, p. 114.) Jonathan Morrow: . . . this Gospel is technically anonymous." However, when it comes to the four Gospels, there is no one specifically to defend (i.e., because it is technically anonymous). Martin Hengel: According to Mark” were used much earlier than previously suspected (Studies in the Gospel of Mark [Minneapolis: Fortress, 1985], 64-84). These titles were added sometime before the end of the first century, prompted most likely by the presence of two or more gospels that needed to be distinguished. Bill Mounce: It would have been nice if there were ancient publishers that had statements of authorship and dates of writing, but there weren't. Rather, we must rely on scant historical evidence, but in the case of the Gospels the evidence is not really that scant. We can comfortably believe that the traditional authorship of the four Gospels is accurate, and that means Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were in a place to know who Jesus was, what he did and what he taught. Dr. W Graham Scroggie, Moody Bible institute, Chicago, one of the most prestigious Christian evangelical missions in the world: “It is human, yet divine”; “...Yes, the Bible is human, although some out of zeal which is not according to knowledge, have denied this. Those books have passed through the minds of men, are written in the language of men, were penned by the hands of men and bear in their style the characteristics of men....” Kenneth Cragg, the Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem,. . . Not so the New testament . . . There is condensation and editing; there is choice reproduction and witness. The Gospels have come through the mind of the church behind the authors. They represent experience and history.....” (The Call of the Minaret”) Dan Wallace, conservative Christian textual scholar, Dallas Theological Seminary: Scholars have for a long time recognized that the Gospel writers *shape* their narratives, including the sayings of Jesus. A comparison of the Synoptics reveals this on almost every page. David. M. Carr, Union Theological Seminary, Colleen M. Conway, Seton Hall Univeristy: All four of the canonical gospels were originally anonymous. It was only in the second century CE, when the four gospels were published a a collection that the superscriptions were added to the gospels, attributing authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John respectively. This is also the time that traditions begin to appear about the authors, claiming that they were either original apostles of Jesus or close acquaintances of other well-known apostles. in spite of these attributions, most scholars do not think any of these men were the original gospel writers. None of the gospels is written in a style that suggests the authors was present at the events being narrated. Nor is it likely that the disciples of Jesus were able to write in Greek, the language in which the gospels were written. So we are left with the reality that the gospels were written by anonymous Christians decades after the events that they relate. Dr. Dale Martin, Yale University: The four Gospels were published anonymously… they seem to have been written with no authors names attached. We don’t know how or when these names were attached to these Gospels’ that is lost to history. Dr. David E. Aune, University of Notre Dame: The four Gospels were written anonymously between A.D. 70 and 100, and assembled into a collection about A.D. 125. The authors did not provide them with titles, others added them later. Dr. Ben Witherington, Asbury Theological Seminary: Formally speaking, all four canonical Gospels are anonymous since their authors names are not mentioned anywhere within the context of the verses themselves… The superscript of each of the four Gospels is not an original part of the document.. it was likely later appended to the scroll for identification. Raymond E. Brown, PhD, Catholic Biblical scholar: The view that the evangelists were not themselves eyewitnesses of the public ministry of Jesus would be held in about 95% of contemporary [biblical] scholarship. The designation that you find in your New Testament, such as "the Gospel According to Matthew" are the results of late-second-century scholarship attempting to identify the authors of words that had no identification. No evangelist indicated who he was. The original copies of the New Testament books have long since disappeared. Even the true identity of their authors is to a large extent a matter of debate. The time gap between the original accounts of the events and today's surviving manuscripts is a period of over 200 to 300 years. Before this time no written witnesses are available to establish the authenticity of Christian claims. With the exception, that is, of tiny papyrus fragments from the Gospel of John (three verses) and (so its is claimed) from the Gospel of Mark. Because of their fragmentary nature, they are of no great value in establishing the texts of even these two Gospels, let alone the New Testament as a whole. (The Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible) James D.G. Dunn, Emeritus Professor of Divinity in the Department of Theology at University of Durham, Minister of the Church of Scotland and Methodist preacher says "But if we are to submit our speculations to the text and build our theology only with the bricks provided by careful exegesis we cannot say with any confidence that Jesus knew himself to be divine, the pre-existent Son of God." (Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation)
I'm a 16 year old Christian who has had many conversations about Islam and Christianity with Muslim friends lately. Thank you for making this video, it has made my believe in Jesus even stronger!
@@CryOfFearBez I dont see how hes mad but Jesus Christ died because he turned fully human when he came to earth. Him diying was fully controlled and he could have gone back to heaven at any time but he decided to die and suffer for our sins .
As a Christian, I must say you answered these questions very level headedly, and each argument sounds believable. But you missed some small details in a few of your answers, and if I may, I would like to defend my faith and address them: 1. If anything in creation cannot be God, but God can do all things, is it or is it not in his power to take on a human body and interact with his creation? 2. I do not know if the Quran copied from the bible, but I do know that the Bible was originally written in Hebrew and Greek; whenever something is translated, it is not possible to translate it perfectly, synonyms in one language do not mean quite the same in another. For example, in greek there are multiple terms for love; agape = self-sacrificing love, philia = friendship love, eros = erotic love, and several more, but English only has "love" to describe all of them. Why not the same for pharoah and king, are they not both terms for rulers? I do not think a simple translation issue is a strong enough argument, you would have to go back to the original text of both works to have an argument that is worth something. 3. The books of the bible has always been 73 since the Synod of Hippo in 393 CE to now, nothing has been added, and nothing has been taken out (at least in the catholic bible). There was some confusion in the 16th century about the deuterocanonical books being inspired or not (and thus are not in the protestant bible), but archaeological findings of the Dead Sea Scrolls are just one proof that they are indeed inspired. 4. If the Christian faith was a farce, how are there historical accounts of Jesus and his disciples from an unaffiliated Jewish historian, Josephus, and at least two Roman historians, Tacitus and Tranquillas, who wrote about the events happening in Judea and Rome at that time? 5. I completely agree with you on this one. It is wrong that different Christians have rejected the bible. The bible and the traditions passed down with it are the cornerstones of our faith. You cannot reject the bible and still be a good Christian, because then where is your guide? 6. I would also agree with you here, it is unfortunate that on average we as Christians do not know our faith well. But there are the few of us who do. I hope this was not too long, and I do hope you don't mind. Thank you for being considerate and reading what I had to say.
On the translations, I believe he is referring to the various versions of the Bible that have been published. For example, the King James Bible is written as King James VI and I wanted it to read like, purposefully mistranslating words from original literature so that his rule would not be criticized or questioned. So the argument becomes, if the truth has been presented to you, why is there a need for so many versions of the same truth, in order for everyone to accept it? While works can be translated across languages to varying levels of accuracy, it begs the question why there is one Quran, yet so many versions of the Bible in its working, irrespective of language and entirely focusing on what is written?
I think I get what you're saying; why do we have so many versions of the Bible but only one Quran. That can be explained if you go back to the 15th century before the Protestant Reformation. For 1500 years, up until the PR, there was only one "edition" of the Bible that was preserved by the nuns and monks in the monasteries, and this edition is the same one Catholics currently use - not the King James Edition. But the video wasn't talking about that, it was talking about inconsistencies in translation, which is not a good argument as there are many words that mean similar things. Just as if I said "I would like a glass of milk" could also be written as "The person who is formulating this text has a thirst for the nectar of the bovine species." They both mean the same thing, the only difference is the choice of words. All I was saying was that the video's translation argument was not an argument at all, just a misunderstanding of how language works. @@penguinbabeez
No he cannot - there is a principal in metaphysics (a branch of philosophy) that states that no effect can be greater than its cause, in other words something cannot give what it does not have. For example, a human cannot give birth to a dog because it does not have a dog's dna. This principal also works in the reverse, something cannot come from something lesser. Dogs cannot be created from trees, because animals are higher beings than plants. The same principle can be applied to God: if God is indeed All powerful, he cannot create something with More power because that would imply he was lacking something that this new god has. This contradicts the principal stated above because that would mean that God is giving something he does not have. But we just said that he is ALL powerful and not lacking in anything. So no, God cannot create a being more powerful than himself as that would be a negating his title of All powerful. @@HaFii23
Was an atheist. After a lot of research and study i was Confirmed and baptised this week. This video is clear that Ali has zero idea about christianity.
"... Ali has zero idea about christianity." - LOL - While that may be true, the majority of so-called & self-proclaimed "Christians" also know zero, to very little, about their faith ("Christianity). The majority of what they think they know has been 'spoon fed' to them by "pastors" / "ministers" / Sunday School "teachers" / the institutional "church" / etc... Very few take the time and effort necessary to research and verify what they are being fed by their "leaders".
isn't funny how we know where they lived, what languages they spoke, and their life. Peter and Andrew: Where two fisherman, and were brothers. Lived in a town, Bethsaida, on the shore of the sea of galilee. They were wealthy business mean, (known because of the old equipment found scattered across the shore, used for fish business in that time). Peter was a crucial part of the early church, and was crucified upside down. Andrew, scourged then crucified. During the roman empire, Latin and greek were dominantly spoken. In the eastern byzantine empire, where Peter and Andrew lived, speaking and writing in greek were the most dominant. Peter, whos first name was Simon, came from Hebrew roots, but Andrew, the name came from Greek roots; thus providing evidence greek was spoken in the family; and the writing of the scriptures attest to this. @@nunya54
@@nunya54which scholar lmao, there’s a literal authentic chain stemming from the church father aranaius, who was a disciple of polycarp, who was an eye and ear witness of the apostle john
The overwhelming majority of Biblical scholars. There are actually no authentic chains from anyone who wrote the Bible back to Jesus. No one who wrote the Bible was an ear or eyewitness to Jesus. Their ideas don't even agree with the beliefs of the first Christians (or with each other in places). That's why the gospels have never been authenticated. There is no chain back to Jesus and the John, Matthew, Mark and Luke are not known. Those manuscripts were originally anonymous@@nickg2436 They St. Irenaeus on the authority of Polycarp also said he heard from St. John himself, that Jesus was not crucified at the time stated in the gospels but lived to be nearly fifty years old in Against Heresies. He also invented stories about other people rising from the dead to convince people Jesus did. Many Church fathers were known to lie to further Christianity and would not record the whole truth. Other gospels as well were destroyed. The original gospels as well were not seen as divine. As Luke says, they were just the writings of those who thought it good to write. The manuscripts of John have a mysterious origin and the first we know about them and evidence points to him being the author of them. The gospel of John doesn't say who John is. Christianity
We actually do, unlike MOOhamed which earliest accounts are 200 years after his death when the Quran was compiled by uthman lol, many people don’t even think he was a real person lol…….@@nickg2436
"Who do I pray to Holy Spirit or the Father" - praying to the Son, is the same as praying to the Father, just as Jesus says "if you have seen me, you have seen the Father"
@@twig4693 Jesus was the only one that lived a perfect life without sin so he became that sacrifice for all of us so that through Jesus, we can have a relationship with God. Our weakness is sin because we fall into the same trap again & again so this shows his power, not his weakness.
@@twig4693 Nobody has managed to fulfil the OLD law, God wouldn't just free us so instead He sent His only Son our LORD Jesus Christ to earth to fulfil the law be the messiah and do what none of us could do
@@LakeErie_cirE So it means that you can commit any sin, spread corruption in the land, commit war crimes, kill innocents, lie, cheat, or do anything negative imaginable; God will forgive you because Jesus died without sins/died as a sacrifice? Seriously? Why do you punish people for crimes? Just forgive them, Jesus died for those criminals too I guess.
I’m a 16 year old Christian. I’ve been having doubts about Jesus, now, I will die for Jesus. He is King. He is God. And my faith with breath inside of me until the day that I die. Thank you for this video.
Typical brainwashed Christian behaviour 😂😂 ‘he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father’ (Matthew 26:39) ‘During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.’ (Hebrews 5:7) Your Jesus prayed like a Muslim and if he is god, who did he pray to? John 20:17 "Jesus saith to her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father; but go to my brethren, and say to them, I ascend to my Father and your Father, and to my God and your God."
@@freezedupfrost6064 first of all, jesus is the son the father is in heaven, he prayed to the father because he was god in human flesh with human needs, people where struggling with sin so much that almost no one could enter heaven, god saw that and thats why he put jesus on earth, he bled out on the cross for us to wash away our sins, god put human him on earth so that he could wash our sins away and that we would be forgiven for our sins, also the bible says he is one with the father
@@yggggguug877 Yup I know the father of Jesus is god and Jesus is not god. That's exactly what you just said. And this is exactly what it's written in the Qur'an, Jesus was the messenger of Allah who was sent to save the people and offering them paradise. Jesus never says he is god and never asked anybody to worship him.
1 Corinthians 1:18 18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. Thank you lord🙏🙏🙏🙏
O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Alläh and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Alläh and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Alläh is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Alläh as Disposer of affairs. (4:171) The Messiah would never be too proud to be a servant of Allah, nor would the angels nearest to Allah. Those who are too proud and arrogant to worship Him will be brought before Him all together. (4:172) As for those who believe and do good, He will reward them in full and increase them out of His grace. But those who are too proud and arrogant, He will subject them to a painful punishment. And besides Allah they will find no protector or helper.(4:173)
@@Anonymously1648 we don't believe in Allah and your last messanger. You should respect others belief if you want them to respect yours. Happy Christmas because Jesus came to save us🎄
@@Ali17__nothing here was logical. His main arguments are I'm to dumb to understand the holy trinity therefore not real. And look guys at a historical inaccuracy yet ignores the many in the qu'ran
@@Giggleheaven his argument wasn't "I'm too dumb to understand it" it was "the trinity doesn't make sense" and there is no historical inaccuracy in the Quran.
Many issues with these arguments that I could answer as a Christian but I’ll answer the easiest one. How do we know about Jesus without the Bible? Well we certainly know about his Death and Crucifixion. Roman historian Tacitus recorded it in his work Annals, book 15, chapter 44 written in 116 AD. A non Christian historian confirmed his life, prosecution under Pilate, and his Crucifixion.
*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!* To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!
Hebr 1,2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, *by whom also he made the worlds;* as everyone can see the term Son of God refers to the Word of God = god himself! For through that God created the worlds! *what a mistake in the Qur'an!*
@@solalux5763 ah yes read a source that came 600 years after the crucifixion that claims Jesus isn't God, the crucifixion was a hoax and drop everything and follow a pedophile who was married to a 6 year old but don't worry, God sent him , this will clear up confusion
All religions presented themselves as Llies when they denied Jesus his sacrifice! God is holy and therefore inevitably always righteous. So God can never be merciful, gracious, because grace is not justice and therefore is wrong! A holy God can only be holy if he Never does wrong !! So Fact is without Jesus his SACRIFICE out of love for us we would all be lost! Only YHWH is not lying when he says he is HOLY and merciful! Who is YHWH equal? Exactly no one!! JESUS gave himself as a sin offering !! A pure life for a life !! Because we have to be holy = without guilt otherwise God will judge us fair and just !! Jesus is YHWH and thus the Creator of everything and thus has the weight to wash the whole creation clean with these pure lives (Blood) !! God bless you
You don’t need to label your self as a Christian, just read the Bible for what it says all religions are made to deceive and all have a splash of truth. The Christian church borrows way more catholic teachings than you think. The truth is in the Bible don’t get coughed up in these worldly religions If you want a good sores of truth look up kingdom in context RUclips
Your Bible tells you Jesus prayed like Muslims, go do it 👍 "And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as you will" Matthew 26:39 That also says by word that Jesus will is not God's will, how can you make them the same?
@@RbccaFaith Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, but every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 1 Corinthians 11:4-7, You are misinterpreted the verse. Read the whole book and not out of context.
@@moh6734 if you are referring to Jesus fell on his face praying to the Father. You are wrong in every way. He did not pray every 5 times daily. And spoke gibberish. If he did Pray like the Muslim, since the Quran was written 500 to 600 years after, then Muslims are praying like Jesus? Lol
@@lukain4640 the day that u Muslim will know that imran is not the father of mary that day u will open u mouth with me. And by the way u know that.. ali yeah yeah dawah and golden shower mimi hijab will never beat CP so stop acting ...💩🤡
ok you beleive in christinaity right, i haVe found COUNTLESS ERRORS IN THE BIBLE NO.1 = IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DOES IT SAY NO ONE KNOWS OF THE HOUR OTHER THAN THE FATHER, WHICH MEANS JESUS DOES NOT KNWO EVERYTHING, AND THERFORE NOT OMNISCINET AND IS NOT GOD!!! IF U WANT MORE I'LL GIVE U MORE
@@islamwhispers Before reading this reply, pls make sure you're open minded and not just here to debate bcuz that won't get us anywhere. Now to answer your question: Him being God, does NOT mean that He's the Heavenly Father....Notice how He says "No one knows of the hour other than the FATHER" (Key word: ), the Father is God and so is Jesus Christ. Which means they have the same Spiritual essence. Different Persons, yes. But the same Spiritual nature. Bcuz God is a Spirtiual Being, every Person in the Godhead has a different purpose, think of it as an entire body "If the foot should say, 'Because I am not a hand, I am not of the body,' is it therefore not of the body?" (verse: I Corinthians 12:15) Hope this answers your questions. Feel free to ask another one, not to debate Christians, but to learn about what they believe in. And do NOT forget: Not understanding ≠ Error. But it's good you're reading the Holy Bible.....even if it's to look for "mistakes"
@@islamwhispers Why would Allah allow Jesus to be crucified? You say he was a prophet, why was Biblical things real? I thought Allah would want people to worship him, why would he allow Jesus to be worshipped?
ok you beleive in christinaity right, i haVe found COUNTLESS ERRORS IN THE BIBLE NO.1 = IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DOES IT SAY NO ONE KNOWS OF THE HOUR OTHER THAN THE FATHER, WHICH MEANS JESUS DOES NOT KNWO EVERYTHING, AND THERFORE NOT OMNISCINET AND IS NOT GOD!!! IF U WANT MORE I'LL GIVE U MORE
Honestly after watching the video then running to the comments and reading them, I want to say Thank you Ali Dawah! You made us Christians stronger in our faith more than before :) This video got to be watched by every Christian who has doubts, because it will only get them closer to Christianity.
the real killer to the trinity is this : According to the trinity, jesus was FULLY GOD and FULLY HUMAN at the same time whilst on earth. If you don't agree with this, you're committing a heresy. Also according to the bible, Jesus did not know the hour whilst he was on earth. As God is all knowing, that means that it is logically impossible for Jesus to have been fully God whilst on earth, hence the trinity is incorrect.
Dude u make no sense and numbers don’t lie A religion that keep changing its principles by accepting homosexuality.. and other clear transgressions will only keep disappearing. You barely see Christianity in the west any ways
by being fully God, it mostly talks about his divinity. Because he was also fully human, he had the limitations of a human, so he couldn't know the the hour@@dresdi
a necessary part of divinity is being all knowing, you cannot have full divinity without knowing the hour + everything else. it is literally a logical error. There is no way to get around this, you cannot be God or divine in anyway unless you have all the features that make God God, unless you want to claim that jesus is some type of 'demigod'
@@Aiden_Muslim Or rather rewatch the video and see the ignorance for yourself , this man made his OWN VERSION of Christianity, that he proceeds to debunk non that nonsense apply to actual Christians you guys don’t understand our beliefs you simply try to Argue and disprove because you know that if the Bible and christianity is right , then Islam is a big embarrassing lie .... An example is all muslims are given rehearsed questions to blast Christians with but we Christians don’t even waste our time with nonsense like that when there’s people who need salvation not arguments. Secondly even the Quran doesn’t understand Christianity showing that Muhammad was like Ali Dawah Ignorant proceeding to claim the trinity included MARY , why would the TRUE LITERAL word of God butcher something like that ?? Only Muslims will ever know
@@Aiden_Muslim nah sorry. Not Muslim, Not Christian but he just debunks a made up Christianity he shaped from his own Islamic lens. I can't see this video convincing anyone out of Christianity. Most things he argued about are baseless and are basic strawmen.
Before watching this I was a Christian, and now after watching this in its entirety I am even more certain of my Christian Faith! Thank you and praise Jesus
What is your evidence from your Holy Book that Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, is God? Did he say, “I am God,” or did someone say to him, “Oh God?” Did he say, “Worship me,” or did he say, “I am the one who created you, provided for you, gave you life, and caused you to die,” or did someone say to him, “O our Creator, our Sustainer, and the Administrator of our affairs?”
You say that God was incarnated in the image of Christ, peace be upon him Did he tell you that I am God incarnate? Is this dangerous matter that results in entering Heaven or Hell not worth mentioning? Aren't his words supposed to be clear so that there is no excuse for anyone to say: I did not understand that from him because he did not say it explicitly?
You say that God was incarnated in the image of Christ, peace be upon him Did he tell you that I am God incarnate? Is this dangerous matter that results in entering Heaven or Hell not worth mentioning? Aren't his words supposed to be clear so that there is no excuse for anyone to say: I did not understand that from him because he did not say it explicitly?
When you're talking to a Christian.. Q: Who is God? A: Jesus Q: Is Jesus the son of Mary? A: Yes, Q: Who created Mary? A: God Q: Who is God? A: Jesus God Jesus was born from the mother he created(Mary) Q: Is Jesus a born son? A: Yes, Q: Who is his father? A: God Q: Who is God? A: Jesus God Jesus is the father of God Jesus and the creator of the mother he was born from hes the son of his wife Q: Is Jesus the servant of God? A: Yes, Q: Did Jesus die on the cross? A: Yes, Q: And for whom did he go up? A: To God God Jesus was crucified & ascended to God Jesus Q: Is Jesus a messenger? A: Yes, Q: Who sent him? A: God Q: Who is God? A: Jesus God Jesus was the messenger of God Jesus. God sends himself as a messenger of himself Q: Did Jesus pray when he was alive? A: Yes, Q: Whom was he praying for? A: For God Q: Who is God? A: Jesus God Jesus worships God Jesus himself Q: Does God have a beginning? A: No Q: So who was born on December 25th? A: Jesus Q: Who is God? A: Jesus God Jesus is eternal before everything but he was born in 25th Dec Q: Where is God? A: In Heaven Q: How many Gods are there in Heaven? A: God is only one. Q: Where is Jesus sitting? A: He is sitting on the right of God. Q: Is Jesus a God? A: Yes Q: So how many Gods are there in Heaven? A: Only one God Q: Where is Jesus? A: He is sitting to the right of God. Q: So how many gods are there in Heaven? A: Only one god. Still Q: Is Jesus a God? A: Yes Q: So how many seated gods are there? A: Only one God, Q: Where is Jesus? A: He is sitting next to the god. Q: How many gods are there in heaven? A: Only one. Q: Are they sitting on the same chair? A: These words are understood only by the one who has the holy spirit. God sacrificed God to God in order to save God's creation from God. God prayed to God for help but God didn't help God, and God killed God with help from humans. And that God is a father of himself and the mother of himself and the son of mother he created at the same time. He is also eternal but his birthday is...
Nearly every argument he made against so-called Christians was strawman. I have travelled the world interacting with Christians and Muslims. Typically the Muslims revert immediately to insults and profanity. Believers in Jesus would refrain from profanity. Just because the speaker does not grasp a concept does not make that concept illogical. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John all knew Jesus and we have historical record about them as well. But the most important historical record is the divine revelation itself, which remains inerrant and preserved regardless of the lies ex-Christians tell. Nearly every argument he made against Christianity is made against Islam. The speaker asked supposed Christians who supposedly claimed they didn’t need the Bible, how they knew their revelations weren’t from Satan. The same can be asked of Mohammad, who gave the verses about Allah’s 3 daughters and later rejected them because Satan had interjected them pretending to be Jabril. How did Mohammad know that other revelations he recited from Jabril were not also interjected by Satan. If the Quran is God’s Word and God’s Word cannot be corrupted, why did Uthman have to collect and destroy all the variant readings? Why did many of the variant readings of the Quran survive this attempt and can be found on display in a museum in Istanbul among other places. Again, I pray those spreading their propaganda meet up with some true believers.
@@maxsss03 pls don't disrespect 😊 I am also Muslim but I'm not gonna say 'since you're Christian you're going to hell on judgement day'😢 no my friend don't say this 😊
Exactly for all muslim , because all of your are blind and following a blind prophet name is muhammad that verse alone perfect for all muslim because all of you are blind from the heart. You prove my point thank you 😊
the moment he start explaining about trinity, is the moment i can tell he have it wrong about trinity 😅😅 pause the video, make comments and close the tab😂
@@ramymansour4179 to explain it in simple terms- you have your blood, your flesh, and your mind, are these 3 different things separate from you/ distinct from you? No , they are the parts that make you whole, in other words, you are ONE being made up of different parts and that is the same thing with the trinity. In Christianity we believe God is ONE supernatural being made up of 3 different parts/persons that make him whole
ok wait i have a question. i dont mean to hate just actual curosity. you guys believe in the holy trinity. so that god is, the father, the son and the holy spirit. yet the holy sprit is not the father or the son, the son is not the father or the holy spirit and the father is not the son or the holy sprit. and i saw someone explain this that god is all 3 of them and that he divided himself into 3 parts so: 1. why would he need to divide himself into 3 parts if hes capable of doing everything by himself? 2. how is it that if god divided himself into 3 parts that why are those 3 parts not the same?
@@nini-ux9weNo, god can't be divided... That's wrong. I will try to explain Trinity in a simple way.God has three positions called Father,Son and Holy spirit.They are distinct but one God. Also note that if someone explained Trinity as an examples of water (H20 molecules) ,egg ,avocado blah blah they are wrong. It's simple to understand actually
@@amerbasyer 15 Jesus is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. Colossians 1:15 - 17
I love that through this video there are so many Christians that are strengthening their faith instead of getting mad. It shows how strong of believers you are. Do not show hate to Muslims, for they do not know any better. Show love to them and have patience. Pray that they shall come to sense soon, into gods light.
Ali Dawah: "God cannot be in His creation" Also Ali Dawah: "How Allah enters His creation every third part of the night, only Allah knows" Conclusion: God and Allah are not the same 😂
First of all, Jesus making a bird from clay is umbilical. And God took on the human from to make his dwelling among us; which was necessary to be the sacrifice for us to be cleansed from our sins. When God decided to take on his human form, he voluntarily restricted his knowledge to have a human nature, and yet fully God at the same time. (Humans don't have all wisdom, but God had to do this in order to serve us by dying for us, despite the fact we don't and never will be worthy of his grace) However, Jesus still revealed and displayed his divinity and knowledge on other occasions (John 2;25, 11;43-44)@@ebm4205 But, when Jesus resurrected, his wisdom was unlocked, and had full access to all of it. His earthy ministry restricted him because he chose to do so, and it was part of submission.
@@ebm4205I see you got that from the book of Thomas, there is a reason it's not included in the official Bible ( ask yourself why it wasn't included..... FYI, don't think it's that obvious. Do your research first before pointing out such ) I'll end here !!..... May God bless you
thats all you're going to take into account? what about the factual, historical error of the pharaoh and/or the king. if you watch hijab wood debate maybe you'll learn something.
@@abz.rehman Jesus is a prophet of God and prophets cannot lie. He said He would crucified and would raise his body from the dead 3 days later. That means either Jesus lied or that He is who He said He is, In Revelation 22, Jesus said: 12 “And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.” Is this another lie from Jesus?
mysticvagrant wrote: " On a serious note, how can he not establish the Trinity correctly? That is actually just embarressing. " He creates his own straw-man version of the Trinity and then attacks it.
Jesus meets no criteria of a god 👇 ( Matthew 4 : 1 ) Jesus was tempted ( James 1:13 ) God cannot be tempted ( John 1:29 ) Jesus was seen ( 1 John 4:12 ) No man has ever seen God ( Numbers 23:19 , Hosea 11 : 9 ) God is not a man ( Acts 2:22 ) Jesus was and is a man , sent by God ( Hebrews 5 : 8-9 ) Jesus had to grow and learn ( Isaiah 40:28 ) God doesn't ever need to learn ( 1 Corinthians 15 : 3-4 ) Jesus died ( 1 Timothy 1:17 ) God cannot die ( Hebrews 5 : 7 ) Jesus needed salvation ( Luke 1:37 ) God doesn't need salvation ( John 4 : 6 ) Jesus grew weary ( Isaiah 40:28 ) God can't grow weary ( Mark 4:38 ) Jesus slept ( Psalm 121 : 2-4 ) God doesn't sleep ( John 5:19 ) Jesus wasn't all powerful ( Isaiah 45 : 5-7 ) God is all powerful ( Mark 13:32 ) Jesus wasn't all knowing ( Isaiah 46 : 9 ) God is all knowing
@@choconada7525 he cant because its impossible. I heard a quote once i dont remember who said it „If you can explain the trinity to someone you didnt understand it“
I was once atheist, but after watching this video, I have become Christian and given my heart and soul to Jesus, he is mighty to save, and nobody goes to heaven except through him.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, I am Christian and I still am Christian the more hate to Christianity shows the more people want to get rid of it. Which God said would happen.
So strange that they will believe a religion that came 600 years after Christianity. They claim that the disciples never met Jesus. History records them dying for their beliefs.
As strange as Jesus coming so many years after Moses? The Bible wasn't complete as we know it until hundreds of years after the 600 years. So that's kind of strange too.
@@nunya54 That is a lie! All the prophets pointed towards the messiah. No one pointed towards Muhammad. Also, the bible was compiled by 90 AD. History records the first believers of Christ dying for their beliefs. Islam is wrong.
The Bible was written over 1500 years@@vze21gwa Which Bible are you speaking off exactly and which books as many of the manuscripts, like those of John that are used most often to try to prove Jesus is God came after the time of Islam All prophets pointed towards a messiah? Not God or the son of God, right? The Jews had prophecies of two messiahs actually and those prophecies were not names but descriptions and some of those descriptions fit Jesus and some do not; some of them only fit Muhammad and no other prophet. Sorry, but there is no evidence of the first believers in Christ following or believing in him as other than a prophet of God like prophesized in the Torah and the messiah. There is no evidence of any prophet or Jesus himself ever saying he was the son of God or God. On the contrary, what Islam says about Jesus is exactly as those who first believed in Jesus say about Jesus. Islam also has nothing in it proven false. You can believe as you like, of course, but beliefs aren't evidence and Islam has evidence. Please check your facts on when the Bibles were written.
@@nunya54 Okay, here goes: 1) The oldest manuscript we have of the book of Job is 1500BC, 3500 years ago; written in Paleo Hebrew to be exact. The new testament was done by 90AD. We know this because it does not mention the destruction of the second temple. The early church fathers quoted the New Testament and the trinity. 2) The Messiah was always said to have Godly characteristics: Isaiah 9:6 refers to him as mighty God. Psalm 110, David says "My Lord said to my Lord sit at my right hand while I make your enemies into a footstool". Read Job 9:30-35. The Messiah was to have Godly characteristics. Muhammad was NOT a Jew, nor did he live near the area. God did not give Arabs any prophecies, nor did he make any covenants with them. 2B) The Jews had a problem interpreting some of the prophecies so there came about "The Two Messiah Theory" whereby they believed that there would be two Messiahs. Messiah Ben Joseph (the son of Joseph) who would be the suffering servant, and Messiah Ben David (the son of David), the conquering king. They couldn't understand that Jesus was going to come twice, once to die for our sins, the second to reign forever. 3) The first believers believed that Jesus was the son of God. So did the early Church Fathers. Polycarp for example was the Bishop of Smyrna and a disciple of John the Apostle. He believed as did Justin Martyr and Ignacius. Also, the disciples themselves did miracles. Yes, they did miracles. Peter rose Dorcas from the dead Acts 9. Paul rose Eutychus from the dead in Acts 20. The disciples were constantly telling people the miracles came as a result of Jesus Christ. 4) The Quran was written 600 years AFTER the Bible and it does have contradictions!. Surah 5:116 says that Mary is part of the trinity when that has NEVER been a core belief. Also, Surah 96 says man was created from a blood clot, while 25:54 says water. Which is it? Muhammad did no miracles at all. He could not be a prophet. Buddha, Confucius and Muhammad are all in their tombs. Jesus lives and is alive. All other faiths are works-based, except Christianity, which is grace based. 5) Jesus himself said that he was God. John 8:58 when he said "Before Abraham was 'I am'." The term "I am" is how God referred to himself. John 10:30 Jesus said "My father and I are one". The people understood what he was saying. God is a trinity, John 1. When Jesus came down from heaven he left his glory behind John 17: 1-5. He came in the form of man and took all the limitations of a man, even unto death. But, because he was sinless, death could not hold him.
@@vze21gwa I hope that you will try to learn on your own and verify information as some of those details are incorrect. Muhammad performed many miracles, just like and similar to the ones Jesus did. He also fits the criteria in the Bible to know when a person speaks from God and their are descriptions of him that do not fit anyone else. Moses, Noah, Abraham, they're all dead too and according to Christians, Jesus died as well. That does not disprove prophethood unless you're rejecting all the prophets in the Bible. Christianity is grace based but that's not what Jesus taught. That's what PAUL taught (and he was considered an apostate of the law, a heretic and a liar posing as rabbinically trained). Jesus taught salvation through repentance, obedience, faith and works AFTER God's grace and mercy just like Islam teaches and just like all the prophets before Jesus taught. Since these ideas Paul borrowed from the pagan religions where he made his religious base among, incarnation, redeemer, savior figures, begotten sons, trinities and triads, they were probably grace based faiths too as he was trying to make Christianity as easy as possible to accept and do to attract pagan converts. Drop the work and just accept Jesus though there is nowhere Jesus says that himself and James and Jude refuted Paul for teaching that. It's literally two verses that mention the Trinity and Mary is not in them. The Trinity is not mentioned in verse 5:116: And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen. See, no Trinity. Why is this mention? Because Mary WAS worshipped by Christians but not part of the Trinity. The Collyridians worshipped Mary. Catholics, who pray to Mary, worship Mary by the definition of worship in Islam. The Quran was NOT written 600 years AFTER the Bible as many manuscripts of the Bible came hundreds of years AFTER Islam, like manuscripts of John with the highest Christology. What would the time period matter though as Jesus came how many years after Moses? So the Jews are justified in rejecting Jesus and the New Testament for that same reason? Jesus himself cannot be proven to have said anything in the Bibel since John can't be proven to be real and he never met Jesus nor does he say where he heard Jesus say those things. Jesus also said to make his disciples one with God too. Bishop Faustus: “It is certain that the New Testament was not written by Christ himself, nor by his apostles, but a long while after them, by some unknown persons, who, lest they should not be credited when they wrote of affairs they were little acquainted with, affixed to their works the names of the apostles, or of such as were supposed to have been their companions, asserting that what they had written themselves, was written according to these persons to whom they ascribed it .” (Faust, lib. 2. Quoted by Rev. R. Taylor: Diegesis, p. 114.) David. M. Carr, Union Theological Seminary, Colleen M. Conway, Seton Hall University: All four of the canonical gospels were originally anonymous. It was only in the second century CE, when the four gospels were published a a collection that the superscriptions were added to the gospels, attributing authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John respectively. This is also the time that traditions begin to appear about the authors, claiming that they were either original apostles of Jesus or close acquaintances of other well-known apostles. in spite of these attributions, most scholars do not think any of these men were the original gospel writers. Raymond E. Brown, PhD, Catholic Biblical scholar: The view that the evengilists were not themselves eyewitnesses of the public ministiry of Jesus would be held in about 95% of contemporary [biblical] scholarship. The designation that you find in your New Testament, such as "the Gospel According to Matthew" are the results of late-second-century scholarship attempting to identify the authors of words that had no identification. No evangelist indicated who he was.
ensure not to pray 2 mary & joseph... it is pagan... and do not wear a cross or have a cross.. coz that is also pagan... no images or idols is permitted
Before watching this I was Christian, now I’m even more strengthened in my faith in Christianity. This man has absolutely done no research and isn’t making anysense. God help him
I heard there was an intellectually convincing preacher here so I came. After this video, I went to research on the Trinity and the Hypostatic union, and it strengthened my faith in Christianity.
CHRISTIANITY and Judaism are the WORLD'S MOST DEVASTATING SCAMS/FORGERIES/DECEPTIONS/FALSEHOODS: CHRISTIANITY and Judaism are by far, not just the world's biggest scams but also the WORLD'S MOST BARBARIC SCAMS that have existed for more than TWO THOUSAND YEARS that have been responsible in the DEATHS of over THREE HUNDRED MILLION PEOPLE and HUNDREDS of TRILLIONS of dollars in destruction all over the world. Read, a multi-award-winning and wirld's renowned expert on the New Testament, PROFESSOR Dr. Bart Erhman's FORGERY and COUNTERFORGERY OXFORD University Press; Joseph Wheless' FORGERY in CHRISTIANITY published by Alfred A Knopf. By far the world's MOST ATROCİOUS religion is CHRİSTİANİTY, whose followers, implementing BİBLİCAL GENOCİDAL commandments, have killed over 😮😮😮 THREE HUNDRED MİLLİON 😮😮😮 Native Americans, Africans, İndians, Afghans, Middle Eastern, etc. since 1490, followed by ATHEİSM, yes it is a religion based on ABSURDİTİES, in just 100 years have been responsible for the deaths of over 100 MİLLİON of mostly Russians and Chinese. İf not because of a series of wars against the CHRİSTİANS, ISLAM would have been the WORLD'S MOST PEACEFUL and the LEAST ATROCİOUS religion. The BİBLİCAL evidence that CHRİSTİANS are the world's most genocidal religion: With CHRİSTİANS go straight to the JUGULAR: 😳😳😳😳😳 The BABY-MASSACRING ETHNİC-CLEANSING GENOCİDAL 😳😳😳😳😳 verses of the BIBLE "Now therefore KILL every male among the LITTLE ONES, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the WOMEN CHILDREN, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for YOURSELVES 😮😮😮 (as SEX SLAVES)." 😮😮😮 (BIBLE: Numbers 31:17-18). (All emphases and parentheses added) 😮😮😮 Bible: CHILDREN dashed to PIECES, their wives RAVISHED 😮😮😮 "Their CHILDREN also shall be dashed to PIECES before their EYES; their houses shall be spoiled, and their WIVES RAVISHED." (Bible: Isaiah 13:16) 😮😮😮 Bible: DESTROY everything that BREATHES 😮😮😮 "Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an INHERITANCE, you shall not leave alive anything that BREATHES. “But you SHALL UTTERLY DESTROY them ..... " (Bible: Deuteronomy: 20:16-17) 😮😮😮 Bible: DESTROY everything that BREATHES 😮😮😮 "So Joshua smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and of the springs, and all their kings: he left none remaining, but UTTERLY DESTROYED all that breathed, as the Lord GOD of Israel COMMANDED." (Bible: Joshua 10:40) 😮😮😮 Bible: Have NO PITY on the fruit of the WOMB 😮😮😮 " "Their bows also shall dash the young men to pieces; and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eye shall not spare children." (Bible: Isiah 13:18) 😮😮😮 Bible: SLAY INFANT and SUCKLING 😮😮😮 "Thus saith the LORD of hosts.............Now go and smite Amalek, and UTTERLY DESTROY all that they have, and spare them not; but SLAY both man and woman, INFANT and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." (Bible: I Samuel 15:2-3) 😮😮😮 Bible: SLAY little CHILDREN 😮😮😮 "And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity: SLAY UTTERLY old and young, both maids, and LITTLE CHILDREN, and woman: ..... ." (Bible: Ezekiel 9:5-6) 😮😮😮 Bible: WOMEN PLUNDER for YOURSELVES 😮😮😮 "When the Lord delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the males .... As for the WOMEN, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as PLUNDER for yourselves." (Bible: Deuteronomy 20:13-14) 😮😮😮 Bible: PREGNANT women RIPPED up 😮😮😮 "Then Menahem smote Tiphsah, and all that were therein, and the coasts thereof from Tirzah: because they opened not to him, therefore he smote it; and all the WOMEN therein that were with CHILD he RIPPED up." (Bible: 2 Kings 15:16) 😮😮😮 Bible: DASHETH thy LITTLE ones against the STONES 😮😮😮 "Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Bible: Psalms 137:9) 😮😮😮 Bible: SLAY utterly.... little CHILDREN, WOMEN 😮😮😮 "And the Lord said unto him, ..... And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity: SLAY UTTERLY old and young, both maids, and little CHILDREN, and women: ....." (Bible: Ezekiel 9:4-6) Bible: DESTROY every WOMAN, VIRGINS brought to CAMP "And this is the thing that ye shall do, Ye shall UTTERLY DESTROY every male, and EVERY WOMAN that hath lain by man. And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four hundred young VIRGINS, that had known no man by lying with any male: and they brought them unto the CAMP to Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan." (Bible: Judges 21:11-12) and MANY more in the BIBLE.
With CHRISTIANS, go straight to the JUGULAR: AMERICAN HOLOCAUST Just one of the NUMEROUS MONSTROUS results of believing in CHRISTIANITY and the BIBLE as the FİNAL AUTHORITY upon every Christian and Jew: ATROCITIES of ASTRONOMICAL Magnitude perpetrated by CHRISTIANS: AMERICAN HOLOCAUST: The bodies of 😳😳😳😳😳 WOMEN and CHILDREN MUTILATED in the MOST HORRIBLE MANNER 😳😳😳😳😳 CHRISTIANS have been responsible for the deaths of more than a 😳😳😳😳😳 HUNDRED MILLION 😳😳😳😳😳 Native Americans: WOMEN and CHILDREN'S bodies MUTILATED in the MOST HORRIBLE MANNER 😳😳😳😳😳 PROF. D. Stannard: All the killers were CHRISTIAN 😳😳😳😳😳 Extracts from: "American Holocaust Columbus and the Conquest of the New World", Professor D. Stannard, OXFORD University Press (All emphases added) " All the killers were Christian. . . . The Nazi system was the consequence of a movement of ideas and followed a strict logic; it did not arise in a void but had its roots deep in a tradition that prophesied it, prepared for it, and brought it to maturity. That tradition was inseparable from the past of Christian, civilized Europe.14 " (Pg. 153) " I saw quite a number of infants in arms killed with their mothers. I should judge there were between 400 and 500 Indians killed .... Nearly all, men, women, and CHILDREN were scalped. I saw one WOMAN whose PRIVATES had been MUTILATED. The bodies were horribly cut up [testified Lucien Palmer, a Sergeant with the First Cavalry's Company C] SKULLS BROKEN in a good many; I judge they were broken in after they were killed, as they were shot besides. I do not think I saw any but what was scalped; saw fingers cut off [to get the rings off them], saw several bodies with privates cut off, women as well as men. I saw a LITTLE BOY covered up among the Indians in a trench, still ALIVE. I saw a MAJOR in the 3rd regiment take out his pistol and BLOW OFF the top of his head. I saw some men unjointing fingers to get rings off, and cutting off ears to get silver ornaments." (Page 132) 😳😳😳😳😳 "The DEAD BODIES of women and CHILDREN were afterwards MUTILATED in the MOST HORRIBLE MANNER 😳😳😳😳😳 [testified David Louderback, a First Cavalry Private] . I saw only eight. I could not stand it; they were cut up too much ..... All manner of DEPREDATIONS were inflicted on their persons [said John S. Smith, an interpreter], they were scalped, their BRAINS knocked out; the men used their knives, 😳😳😳😳😳 RIPPED OPEN WOMEN, 😳😳😳😳😳 CLUBBED their LITTLE children, knocked them in the head with their guns, beat their brains out, mutilated their bodies in every sense of the word . . . worse mutilated than any I ever saw before, the WOMEN all cut to PIECES .... [C]hildren two or three months old; all ages lying there, from sucking infants up to warriors. " (Page 133)
no, pharaohs were not kings for them, the ancient egyptions thought they were god in human form. that is why there body was preserved so that even in the hereafter they could remain human and with all there valuables.
🔴 *The Apostle Paul's Terrible Error* 🔴 📍In the Old Testament: =>the Holy Place contains: Table of Showbread (Showbread on it) + Candlestick + Altar of Incense. =>the Holy of Holies contains: Ark of the Covenant " Hebrews 9:2-4 " *“²For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary. ³ And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; ⁴ Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant”.* There are three errors : - Firstly, Paul mentioned the Table *AND* the Showbread, knowing that the latter is *ON* the Table. (Exodus 25:30 “And thou shalt set *upon* the table shewbread before me alway.”) - The second error is that Paul mentioned the golden censer in the Holy of Holies. Moreover, If we suppose that the golden censer is an element in the Holy of Holies, why was it not mentioned in the Torah or in the Jewish heritage? It is not logical that it's not mentioned in the Torah and then Paul mentioned it after that. The fourth verse mentioned the golden censer then the Ark of the Covenant which contained the Golden Pot, Aaron’s Rod, and the Tablets of the Stone; if the golden censer was of Aaron’s legacy, then Paul should have mentioned it among the contents of the Ark of the Covenant, not in the Holy of Holies. - The third error is that Paul did not mention the Altar of Incense at all. - *Father Matta El Meskeen. The Epistle to the Hebrews: Explanation and Study, pp. 519-520:* the Altar of Incense: the Apostle Paul did not mention it here, and the reasons and interpretations differed.... and in Hebrews 9:4, he mentioned a golden censer, baffling the commentators, because it is known that the Altar of Incense is in the Sanctuary. - *John Gill's Exposition:* but here a difficulty arises, how this can be said to have been in the holy of holies, and within the vail, when, according to Moses, it was without the vail, and was only carried within on the day of atonement; and so Philo the Jew (a) places it in the other part of the tabernacle; and it seems as if it was to avoid this difficulty, that the Ethiopic version has removed it from this verse to verse the second, and put it among the things that were in the holy place. - *Franz Delitzsch. Commentary On The Epistle To Hebrews, pp. 54-55:* Such being the Hellenistic usage, and in particular that that of Josephus and Philo, whose phraseology has so many points of resemblance to that of other author, it seems impossible to escape the conclusion that θυμιατηριον means here the incense-altar, and nothing else. It would be, moreover, a quite inexplicable omission in this connection, had he said nothing about it. But if θυμιατηριον here I the altar of incense, the sacred writer appears to be involved in the grosse error of supposing that this golden altar, of which Philo says correctly that it stood between the golden candlestick and the holy table… and Bleek draws thence the conclusion that he could not have been a Jew of Palestine: but even supposing him to have been an Alexandrine Jew, he must have been a monster of ignorance and forgetfulness to be capable of such a mistake. - *Ellicot’s Commentary for English Readers:* The incense-altar and the ark are coupled together, and the word which describes their relation to the Holiest Place is that which, a little later in this verse, distinctly signifies "containing." So weighty is this consideration that many have been unable to avoid the conclusion that the writer has erred in this matter of detail; and various suppositions have been resorted to in explanation of his mistake. - *Expositor's Greek Testament:* ... and the versions of Symmachus and Theodotion in Exodus 31 use θυμιατήριον for “altar of incense”. Besides, the form of the word indicates that it could be used of anything on which incense is offered. It was, therefore, understood of the “altar” by Clement Alex. and other fathers; by Calvin, who says, “quo nomine altare suffitus vel thymiamatis potius intelligo quam thuribulum;” and by most modern scholars. As has frequently been urged it is incredible that in describing the furniture of the tabernacle there should be no mention of the altar of incense. Difficulty has been felt regarding the position here assigned to it, for in fact it stood outside the veil; and the author has been charged with error. ✴️One of the commentators say that Paul mentioned the golden censer in the Holy of Holies for fear of theft and to be in a safe place, and this is very funny because the commentator forgot that the Candlestick and the Table are plated with gold. Therefore, the commentary is ridiculous, because even if the golden censer was moved to the Holy of Holies for fear of theft, the Candlestick and the Table are plated with gold too (Exodus 25). 🔴 The question remains, why did Paul not mention the Altar of Incense? There are two solutions, the sweetest of which is bitter; either Paul did not write by inspiration or he is an ignorant liar.
*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!* To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!
Thank you heavenly Father for sending Jesus to show the example of how to serve you. Thank you that NO one can refute that Christ was without sin. No man has ever been without sin no even muhammad . Thank you God that you are not limited and that you actually communicate with those who accept that Jesus died for the atonement of sin. Every other belief can't rejoice in knowing their prayers get answered, they don't heal the sick and without accepting Christ they have no assurance of being free from sin.
Jesus peace be upon him prayed to God with his head on the ground... If he is the example of how to serve God according to Christianity, why aren't you? In the bible it says that you shouldn't have pork or drink alcohol, why are the Christians still eating and drinking that what is forbidden? In the bible it says that woman should cover their hair, why aren't they? The muslims are more Christian than the Christians themselfs.. Jesus (PBUH) was a muslim.. Nowhere in the bible Jesus says ''I am God'' or '''Worship me"' and if the bible wasn't corrupted we muslims would read everyday from it just like the Quran (the LAST and COMPLETED testament)
@@Ines-kw5sx because you're taking out of context,that's the old testament, When Jesus died, the curtain of the temple was torn, which means, we don't have to go to Jerusalem to pray every time, we don't have to cover our hair anymore, there are two commandments, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul and with all thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself, which technically amounts to the 10 commandments and more. so Jesus sacrified so that we can have acces to God, being forgiven of our sin trough Him
@@HandsomeT-z4l There is absolutely nothing wrong with the old testaments, where did i say that, maybe you got it wrong, the new testament complete the first one and both are the Word of God
Hi just here to say that I'm a PROUD Christian and I love Jesus Christ forever. I'm going through the worst days of my life rn, but I would never denounce Jesus and Christianity not even for a second.
Before when i was not muslim ,i also felt as you ...sad , depressed, anoxios/scared ,lazy ,empty ,suicidal thoughts, no happiness. But when i turn to Allah(God) my life changed opposite ,Jesus also turned to God and used to pray and cry to Him even Bible says it,you should follow teachings of Jesus who was also a muslim .you should educate yourself about Islam , because why not learn about worlds number 1 religion with the most population ,you still have a chance ❤ Btw at least Islam makes sense and has answers for everything you need in you life . You will learn who are you ,why God created you ,what is your purpose ,etc... Don't waste and play with your time ,education will not hurt you it can only help you❤
youre going through the worst days , its a sign lmao, turn to god only and stop worshiping the messenger (Jesus) who came so that you can worship god not him
@@whozhio7878 Quran is a twisted copy of Bible dude. The sole purpose of Quran is to damage the word of true God. Don't worry, my problems are nothing compared to what many others are going through in this world. Thanks for your care. Going with what you said, except a few Arab countries, Muslim countries are the worst to live in the world. Why is that so? Lmao. Also, u seems to be true Muslim like others as you literally said Lmao when somebody said he's in pain. Hope you have beautiful hoori waits for you in paradise. 🤣
@@Mohammad-793 Don't waste your time with him. In the end each of us have a grave of our own, let him see what he will find in the end being a polytheist.
not related to this topic but i have noticed how people who believe in islam are very discipline but some people who claim they are Christians do the most non Christian like behavior and if you insult islam in any way or form in an islamic country there would be serious consequences but us Christians have become too tolerant and if someone wears a shirt "jesus was gay" you would be fine.
Greetings and Blessings, Well Christianity is not a forced religion and so true Christians are not going to punish oppositional behavior because Vengeance is the Lord's. He will repay. Besides, the Bible is clear that unbelievers have a spirit of disobedience working within them... There are only children of God and children of the Devil. So, the rebellion and hatred are inevitable and too be expected as Jesus warned his disciples about it. Also, there is no such thing as a Christian nation because the Christian mandate is to make disciples of all nations teaching them to obey what Christ commanded. Love God and Love their neighbor as themselves. I don't expect rebellious people to accept God's ways and standards... they haven't encountered Him and been spiritually transformed by Him... so someone wearing a t-shirt such as you mentioned would just be in alignment with the God haters that the Bible talks about from Romans 1. Punishment, Fear, and Force to get someone to adhere to one's religion is not anything a Christian would condone. -Blessings from Tajji in Tanzania
i think you shouldn't tell this to make christians look better (or to be proud of it for being "too" tolerant, maybe). those christians joking like that probably feeling dorky and more special just because they can disrespect their god only for the sake of being funny. it's really weird. and this what makes christians and muslims different. just because you can, doesn't mean you should. you know homosexuality is forbidden in bible too right? and now maybe you and those christians should start seeing the christian jesus as "god" and stop looking at petty jokes as a funny thing. maybe this is why bibles get edited so many times into so many verses because some christians just can't handle the "strict" rules of their religion so they make it easier for their satisfactions.
@@1.7jt I didn't say this to make other Christians proud of being very tolerant though and I think the Bible gets edited to help some readers understand it better because if I read the original Bible it would be quite a difficult task to do so.
1 - Whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi (Glory be to Allah and Praise Him) a hundred times during the day, his sins are wiped away, even if they are like the foam of the sea [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:168] 2 - whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi, Subhan-Allahi 'l-`adheem (Glory be to Allah, and Praise, Glory be to Allah, the Supreme) Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Two words are light on the tongue, weigh heavily in the balance, they are loved by the Most Merciful One " [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:67] 3. La Hawla wa la Quwatta illa Billah (There is no Might or Power except with Allah) [the above is] a treasure from the treasures of Paradise.[Sahih al-Bukhari; al-Fath al-Bari #11:213] 0
1. So if you go kill someone for no reason, then you can say it 100 times that day and your sin will be wiped away...Moreover,you can kill multiple times and just say the phrase 100 times each and get away with it in heaven. Hahhahahaha nice trick xD
@@24archfiend I dont think you understand. It wont work if you dont say it from heart. You have to try your best to not do those sins again and then say that 100 times during the day to get your sins wiped. You cant just kill people and then say it and then kill more people the next day
Un no he didn’t just because you don’t understand the trinity doesn’t mean Christianity is not true, why didn’t he say anything about the historical facts? And that’s another thing even though you don’t know which John wrote the book of John that doesn’t mean none of them met Jesus, but it’s pretty obvious it was the apostle because he wrote pretty much everything about Jesus so that means he was with him all the time. The reason I believe Muhammad is that Jesus had already talked about false prophets in the beginning and BAM. 6 Centuries later Muhammad comes up with Quran. Bruh give me break if you want to say Muhammad is right then he at least had to be around Jesus. But he wasn’t and this is 600 years later. Just to sum it up, without the Bible you have no Quran. If your God was so true then he wouldn’t had made mistakes, and correcting everything in the Koran, you cant say that about In the New Testament either because Jesus was already prophesies from the beginning
@@justabenzndat5575 No he never. No Christian believes in "3 God's," not Christian believes that the persons aren't "self sufficient," and "don't have 1 will," You think he debunked our faith when He never even actually spoke about what we truly believe in the video.
I was having a hard time as a christian. After watching your video, my faith in Jesus stared growing again & I felt better than ever before. Keep up the good work Ali Dawah, you're making our Christian Community (umma in devil term) only stronger
@@badshahSelamet can I ask whether or not you have actually looked yourself for any information or whether you've just blindly believed what you've been told. I could happily sit here and tell you all the relevant proof that would disprove all his idealogies and more but you wouldn't believe me. Instead try researching for yourself using non bias sources and not looking for the answer you want
@@badshahSelamet he won't debate scholars as his knowledge is very limited and he's already been exposed for what he is. If this is the best Islam has got to offer then no wonder you have a tsunami of apostasy happening .
lets see you try to praise Isa a.s (jesus) in Yawm Al Qiyama, only a few signs left, most of the signs mentioned by the prophet has come true. Hold onto your cross and see where it leads you, or accept Allah and submit your life to him and seek forgiveness.
no "Muslim friend" is accepting christianity it's quite the opposite LOL Islam is the fastest growing religion even in christian majority countries like the US and continents like Europe
@@1faaiz110 YES.. IT IS PROPHECIED IN THE BIBLE in the last days... false religion will cover the whole world to the extent that true religion becomes so rare
You wish. No Muslims are accepted Christianity. We will not believe in a god that came out of a woman private part pussy. We are too intelligent. You so stupid you say 1+1+1= 1. Sorry that your god is crying to "ALLAH ALLAH WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME " Mathew 27 : 46
You sure ? I see a lot of empty church and a lot of full mosque around me 😏 You should do some research about the fastest growing religion in the world.
I see so many Christians in denial mode and saying "I was Christian before this video and I am still Christian" and some even say "My faith in Christianity is increased". Look what ALLAH (S.W.T) tells about these kinds of ignorant and close minded people. " Those who deny the truth are like animals which hear nothing in your call but the sound of a voice, without understanding its meaning. They are deaf, dumb and blind. They understand nothing". [Surah Baqarah:171] "It is not the eyes that are blind, but their hearts which are in their breasts" (heart). [Surah Hajj:46] "As for those who are bent on denying the truth, it makes no difference to them whether you warn them or not, they will not believe". [Surah Baqarah :6] "God has sealed their hearts and their ears, and over their eyes there is a covering. They will have a terrible punishment." [Surah Baqarah:7] there are many more verses about it. ALLAH (S.W.T) KNOWS BEST. MAY ALLAH (S.W.T) GUIDE US ALL AND KEEP US (MUSLIM'S) FIRM ON OUR RELIGION (ISLAM). AMEEN YA RABBULAYLAMEEN.
I actually though this video was going to challenge some of my thoughts but they haven't changed them at all. He literally got the breakdown of the Holy Trinity completely wrong😭 But we shouldn't condemn him but pray for him so that the Lord may open his eyes.
@@islam12539 He said that one day we pray to God, then to Jesus, then to the Holy Spirit, when they're all one. And sorry for the late response I never saw your comment. Everyone else in the comments are saying the exact same thing btw
Judism - we don't accept Jesus as messiah Islam - we accept Jesus as a prophet not God because the new testament is corrupted Meanwhile Christianity - For whoever exalts will be humbled and whoever humbles will be exalted. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God loved the world so much that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not die but have eternal life.
I love how most of the comments mostly (christian people) are just copying and pasting the same comment with no valid proof or evidence that his argument is false or wrong Thanks ali dawah for strengthing my faith in my religion
okay first off the whole "god cant eat god cant sleep" argument, its crazy saying what god can or cant do. ali dawah doesnt decide what god can do or not. second he literally supports p*edophillia. I wish that was slander however i have seen clips not even out of context. god gave us a law. the law was ineffective so god came to earth in human form to die for our sins. in islam the law wasnt effective so they changed a couple of the laws, no human can follow the law fully as we all sin. muhammed randomly changing the law serves no purpose. plus its the testimony of jews romans and christians, (who said jesus claimed to be god) vs arab warlord who married a 6 year old
How do we know that this guy is wrong? 1. His explanation of the Trinity is wrong. The trinity works similar to the Sun, there's the Sun in the sky, the sunrays that come down to your room and the solar panel which powers your house. The Sun is God, the rays that come down are Jesus and the solar panel is the Holy Spirit. The sun is in the sky, but it's also in your room and your house is being powered by the Sun. The rays come from the Sun, and the power comes from the rays. If you had read the Bible honestly you would have seen the order is that Jesus comes from the Father. The Sun is not dependent on the rays. The rays come down to us because if the Sun did, we'd die. 2. I've never heard this claim before but I'd like to point out the Bible also says woe to the one who changes the word of God. "These are added in"? Really? Modern day Quran's which have been translated to English also have things added in because more words are needed to convey one word from Arabic. The changes aren't that drastic unless you're talking about some crazy translation made to purposely mess with the Word of God. Ah, the classic king, Pharoah, argument, the Bible wasn't written in English, it was written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. The word Pharoah, is from the Egyptian word 'Pe-ra' which means great house. As with all words, this term evolved over time to eventually become the term used for the king of Israel. But I would also like to point out that the Joseph story wasn't written as the story was happening, it was written at a later date, when the term Pharoah had likely become known. Did the Bible copy from the Quran? Well comparing the two, I'd say the Quran copied from the Bible, seeing as the Torah had been around for a good while. The Quran is basically like the Bible but with many many additions that form a foundation for the faith (e.g. Abraham and Ishmael building the Kaaba), if the Bible had copied from the Quran, there would have been more information in the Bible than the Quran. You get my drift, the changes are so random and normally have to do with the beliefs that would later be expounded on. 3. Refer to point 1. But logically speaking, let's look at Isa (Jesus in the Quran), why is he the only prophet who was raised to Allah? Even the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) died. This is what sets Jesus apart from all other traditions, the fact that He was raised to the father. The Quran talks about the Injeel (Gospel) and calls it a divine scripture [even though it's not the Quran] which Isa was given to guide His followers. So from a logical point why don't all Muslims read the Gospel seeing as this prophet who was born of a woman who never knew a man, did many miracles and was raised to Allah had teachings? Because there they'd find He is the messiah and came to take away their sins but that would counter their foundational beliefs. If prophets spoke the word of God, in that case why could they be beaten, killed, etc? The Bible says God moved on holy men to write the scriptures, like a prophet has a voice and appearance which differs from another, the same happens with writings. The word of God has been translated into differet languages and still changes the lives of those who read it. Words must be changed because words change meaning over time. Calling someone gay once meant they were happy, so an old book changing the word gay to happy does not make it corrupted. The sixty six books are confirmed in the scripture, in that in the old testament, the golden lampstand which represents the word of God has sixty six knobs on it. The original eighty two books contained writings that were historical accounts or ficticous stories or unecessary additions without verifiable proof of their sources. It's like how Sunni muslims don't use Hadith al-Thaqalayn. Your poison analogy is fallacious, if things from something holy are taken out, it makes it less holy not poison. Why would the disciples write autobiagraphies when they were following the son of God? Makes no sense. 4. Wow there are three John's?! Really disproves Christianity! Islam doesn't have this name confusion simply because the Quran doesn't mention a lot of names aside from the person the book is about and the patriachs. I have never heard of the new Jerome commentary, therefore it's dishonest to make it sound like every Christian knows what you're talking about. This could be said about the Musilim faith too: "I'm getting information from the hereafter by people I don't know, from a book that they wrote inspired by God that's full of what I think to be mistakes and they are telling me about a God that makes no sense." This is basically what religion is, that's where faith comes in. Believing your arguments are true is Janazah. 5. Christians who reject the Bible are not a good example of Christians. It would be as unfair if I said Muslims have now started bombing places. Jesus doesn't need to match in people's visions. When Jesus appeared to his disciples he transformed himself so they couldn't recognize him. People can see Jesus in different ways. Muslims in Iraq have shared testimonies of seeing Jesus and converting to Christianity. They know it's Jesus by what he tells them to do, Satan wouldn't tell you he'd take away your sins and help you live a righteous and holy life. P.s. this would also happen f you'd asked people who claimed they saw Muhammad (peace be upon him) what he looked like. 6. True because of two things. No. 1. Most Christians today aren't really Christians, they were just born into a Christian family. No. 2. Because the foundation of Christianity is faith not logic and faith doesn't have to make sense. The Bible says faith comes by hearing and hearing the word of God and without faith it is impossible to please God. So friend faith isn't the best for winning arguments and winning arguments is not the goal of Christianity. Feel free to contact me for more questions, arguments or whatever at e.i.joel1316[at]G-mail[dotcom]. God bless
I wish I was there and could have told him about his misconceptions about my God ( With the Grace of God ) . Hopefully one day I'll talk to him face 2 face
@@Fazemuj4132 here is your contradiction 👇👇👇 PROPHET SAID : BITE FATHER'S DCIK ( VULGARITY AT PEAK ) HADITH : AL-MUFRAD 963 GRADE : SAHIH best role model of humanity ??? NOW GO AND CRY IN ONE CORNER 🤗🤗🤗
@@Couragethecowardlydog509 Qur’an 55:56 (also describing the condition of paradise): In them are women limiting [their] glances, untouched before them by man or jinni (Sahih International) Abu Umama narrated: "The Messenger of God said, 'Everyone that God admits into paradise will be married to 72 wives; two of them are houris and seventy of his inheritance of the [female] dwellers of hell. All of them will have libidinous sex organs and he will have an ever-erect penis.' " (Sunan Ibn Majah, Book 39) Ali dawahs religion promotes sex brotherel in heaven and ali dawah gets debunked at speakers corner😘🤣
I like how since Christians are finding the truth of Islam you are lying that you converted from Islam to Christianity to make yourselves feel better 😂
@@johnmurphy588 ‘he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father’ (Matthew 26:39) ‘During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.’ (Hebrews 5:7) your Jesus prayed to a god like a muslim
@@freezedupfrost6064 Why you acting like muslims created the whole concept of prostrating and falling to face whilst praying? Pagans prayed to their gods while prostrating long before islam. The Israelites would prostrate in prayer to Yahweh long before islam came. Read Ezra 10:1 "Now while Ezra was praying and making confession, weeping and PROSTRATING himself before the house of God, a very large assembly, men, women, and children, gathered to him from Israel; for the people wept greatly." you try to use the verse Matthew 26:39 as a proof that jesus is an islamic prophet yet muslims don't pray to God as Father, Jesus is the one here calling God my Father Is Allah the Father of Jesus?
@@johnmurphy588 Jesus has no literal father, a god can't impregnate a woman. Main point wasn't that Jesus is a Islamic prophet, main point is that he isn't god. If he was he wouldn't be praying to something else by letting out loud cries and falling on his face
@@RbccaFaith you follow what you think he said, we follow what we think he said, one is right one is wrong or they're both wrong, I don't want to start a discussion over wich faith its better only god will decide if there is even a god
You can stay Christian .. no one is trying to convert you.. all Muslims have the duty to convey the message not covert. Just be truthful to yourself and think about the soundness of trinity… because i m thinking.. without biases.. but not making any sense to me..
It is very easy to refute Islam! Because the God of Islam does not know that according to Christianity God incarnated True love = the love of God! *God himself went to the cross for you out of love for you as a human being* Philippians 2:5-8
Matthew 17:21 KJV: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting." Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in א (original handwriting), B, θ, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Ethiopic manuscripts. It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient - C, D, K, L - as well as some other mss of the ancient versions. It is believed to have been assimilated from Mark.[12] Matthew 18:11 KJV: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost." Reason: This verse is lacking in א, B, L (original handwriting), θ, ƒ1, ƒ13, some old Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Georgian manuscripts, and such ancient sources as the Apostolic Canons, Eusebius, Jerome, and others. It is found in some other sources, not quite so ancient, such as D, K, W, X, and the Latin Vulgate. It is not found in any manuscript before the 5th century.[13] According to Bruce Metzger, "There can be little doubt that the words [...] are spurious here, being omitted by the earliest witnesses representing several textual types... [This verse was] manifestly borrowed by copyists from Luke 19:10."[14] Matthew 23:14 KJV: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation." Reason: This verse is very similar to Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47. This verse is lacking altogether in א,B,D,L,Z,θ, ƒ1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic manuscripts, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. It appears before verse 13 in K,W, and several New Testament minuscules. It appears after verse 13 in ƒ13, some Italic and Syriac and Coptic manuscripts. The fact that it is absent from the most ancient sources of multiple text types and that the sources that do contain the verse disagree about its placement, as well as the fact that it is a repetition of verses found elsewhere, show "that verse 14 is an interpolation derived from the parallel in Mark 12:40 or Luke 20:47 is clear."[14] Mark 7:16 KJV: "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear." Reason: This verse is nearly identical with verses 4:9 and 4:23. This verse here is lacking in א,B,L,Δ (original handwriting), some Coptic mss. It is included in manuscripts only slightly less ancient, A,D,K,W,ƒ1,ƒ13, Italic manuscripts, the Vulgate, some other ancient versions. As it is missing in the very oldest resources and yet is identical to verses that remain, many editors seem confident in omitting its appearance here.[citation needed] Mark 9:44 and 9:46 KJV: "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." (The verses are identical to each other, and to 9:48, which is still in the main text) Reason: Both verses 44 and 46 are duplicates of verse 48, which remains in the text. Verses 44 and 46 are both lacking in א,B,C,L,W,ƒ1, and some manuscripts of the ancient versions, but appear in somewhat later sources such as A,D,K,θ, some Italic manuscripts and the Vulgate. It is possible that verse 48 was repeated by a copyist as an epistrophe, for an oratorical flourish.[15] The UBS text assigns this omission a confidence rating of A. Mark 11:26 KJV: "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses." Reason: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15. This verse appeared in the Complutensian Polyglot and most Textus Receptus editions but Erasmus omitted it and noted that it was missing from 'most' Greek manuscripts.[16] The verse is not in א,B,L,W,Δ,Ψ, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. The UBS edition gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. Mark 15:28 KJV: "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors."" Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. It does not appear here in any New Testament manuscript prior to the end of the 6th century.[17] Luke 17:36 KJV: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left." Reason: It is possible that this verse is a repetition of Matthew 24:40. Even the King James Version had doubts about this verse, as it provided (in the original 1611 edition and still in many high-quality editions) a sidenote that said, "This 36th verse is wanting in most of the Greek copies." This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (1516-1535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st-3rd editions (1546-1550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), the margins of Stephanus' 4th edition (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's editions (1565-1604).[18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20] John 5:3-4 Main article: John 5 § Interpolation (verses 3b-4) KJV: "3[...] waiting for the moving of the water. 4For an Angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had." (Not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.) Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek manuscripts that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [meaning occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the manuscripts that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording.[21] The UBS text gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. This verse was omitted from Edward Harwood's Greek NT (1776), marked as doubtful in Griesbach's editions (1777), and thereafter generally relegated to a footnote, enclosed in brackets, or omitted completely. Henry Alford wrote, "The spuriousness of this controverted passage can hardly be questioned."[22] Without the words at issue the context simply states that a swimming or bathing pool in or near Jerusalem was a gathering place for sick and crippled people, some of whom sought to get into the pool (either for physical comfort or for ritual cleansing) and it was there that Jesus performed miraculous healing. However, the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. This passage in John 5 is the only mention of this pool - no such miraculous pool is mentioned in Josephus or other histories.[23] The words in question do not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and in those manuscripts that contain them they are sometimes marked as doubtful, and differ from manuscript to manuscript "with that extreme variation in the reading which so often indicates grounds for suspicion".[24] The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, א, A (original hand), B, C (original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Verse 4 ("For an angel ...") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ("waiting for the stirring of the water ...") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (14th century), and an Egyptian manuscript. The concluding words of verse 3 but not any of verse 4 appear in D, 33 (9th century), and some Latin manuscripts. The entire italicized passage appears in C (third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), Δ,Θ,Ψ, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts - S,Λ,Π, and a few others - contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. Among the manuscripts that contain this sentence-and-a-half, there are many variations and permutations.[25] The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: "... a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. 5And a certain man was there ...", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. Several modern versions similarly relegate those words to a footnote, and some others (such as Moffatt) include the words in the main text but are enclosed in brackets with an explanation in a footnote.
well lemme explain to you "so called hypocrites" that it makes no sense because we know there are several errors in the Bible and the Qur'an is still error free If the Qur'an was copied from the Bible then where are those errors ? And I have a best friend who is Christian when I asked him about Trinity he said only one sentence I don't believe in trinity ???????? May Allah guide you
@@ClaytonBigsby89 I am a Christian but in this scenario, the word "Us" is translated from the Hebrew word "Ehohim," meaning God. In Hebrew, addressing yourself as a plural symbolized power. Therefore, God referred to himself as "Ehohim" which translates to a plural.
LOL this guy knows nothing.. the trinity is not dependent on each other nor created. Show me where it says that. You make up your own questions and your own answers. The bible clearly says in the beginning was the word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. You haven't debunked anything.
Words of god? Whys ur god’s book verses been taken out Matthew 17:21 KJV: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting." Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in א (original handwriting), B, θ, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Ethiopic manuscripts. It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient - C, D, K, L - as well as some other mss of the ancient versions. It is believed to have been assimilated from Mark.[12] Matthew 18:11 KJV: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost." Reason: This verse is lacking in א, B, L (original handwriting), θ, ƒ1, ƒ13, some old Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Georgian manuscripts, and such ancient sources as the Apostolic Canons, Eusebius, Jerome, and others. It is found in some other sources, not quite so ancient, such as D, K, W, X, and the Latin Vulgate. It is not found in any manuscript before the 5th century.[13] According to Bruce Metzger, "There can be little doubt that the words [...] are spurious here, being omitted by the earliest witnesses representing several textual types... [This verse was] manifestly borrowed by copyists from Luke 19:10."[14] Matthew 23:14 KJV: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation." Reason: This verse is very similar to Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47. This verse is lacking altogether in א,B,D,L,Z,θ, ƒ1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic manuscripts, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. It appears before verse 13 in K,W, and several New Testament minuscules. It appears after verse 13 in ƒ13, some Italic and Syriac and Coptic manuscripts. The fact that it is absent from the most ancient sources of multiple text types and that the sources that do contain the verse disagree about its placement, as well as the fact that it is a repetition of verses found elsewhere, show "that verse 14 is an interpolation derived from the parallel in Mark 12:40 or Luke 20:47 is clear."[14] Mark 7:16 KJV: "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear." Reason: This verse is nearly identical with verses 4:9 and 4:23. This verse here is lacking in א,B,L,Δ (original handwriting), some Coptic mss. It is included in manuscripts only slightly less ancient, A,D,K,W,ƒ1,ƒ13, Italic manuscripts, the Vulgate, some other ancient versions. As it is missing in the very oldest resources and yet is identical to verses that remain, many editors seem confident in omitting its appearance here.[citation needed] Mark 9:44 and 9:46 KJV: "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." (The verses are identical to each other, and to 9:48, which is still in the main text) Reason: Both verses 44 and 46 are duplicates of verse 48, which remains in the text. Verses 44 and 46 are both lacking in א,B,C,L,W,ƒ1, and some manuscripts of the ancient versions, but appear in somewhat later sources such as A,D,K,θ, some Italic manuscripts and the Vulgate. It is possible that verse 48 was repeated by a copyist as an epistrophe, for an oratorical flourish.[15] The UBS text assigns this omission a confidence rating of A. Mark 11:26 KJV: "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses." Reason: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15. This verse appeared in the Complutensian Polyglot and most Textus Receptus editions but Erasmus omitted it and noted that it was missing from 'most' Greek manuscripts.[16] The verse is not in א,B,L,W,Δ,Ψ, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. The UBS edition gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. Mark 15:28 KJV: "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors."" Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. It does not appear here in any New Testament manuscript prior to the end of the 6th century.[17] Luke 17:36 KJV: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left." Reason: It is possible that this verse is a repetition of Matthew 24:40. Even the King James Version had doubts about this verse, as it provided (in the original 1611 edition and still in many high-quality editions) a sidenote that said, "This 36th verse is wanting in most of the Greek copies." This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (1516-1535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st-3rd editions (1546-1550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), the margins of Stephanus' 4th edition (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's editions (1565-1604).[18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20] John 5:3-4 Main article: John 5 § Interpolation (verses 3b-4) KJV: "3[...] waiting for the moving of the water. 4For an Angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had." (Not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.) Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek manuscripts that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [meaning occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the manuscripts that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording.[21] The UBS text gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. This verse was omitted from Edward Harwood's Greek NT (1776), marked as doubtful in Griesbach's editions (1777), and thereafter generally relegated to a footnote, enclosed in brackets, or omitted completely. Henry Alford wrote, "The spuriousness of this controverted passage can hardly be questioned."[22] Without the words at issue the context simply states that a swimming or bathing pool in or near Jerusalem was a gathering place for sick and crippled people, some of whom sought to get into the pool (either for physical comfort or for ritual cleansing) and it was there that Jesus performed miraculous healing. However, the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. This passage in John 5 is the only mention of this pool - no such miraculous pool is mentioned in Josephus or other histories.[23] The words in question do not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and in those manuscripts that contain them they are sometimes marked as doubtful, and differ from manuscript to manuscript "with that extreme variation in the reading which so often indicates grounds for suspicion".[24] The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, א, A (original hand), B, C (original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Verse 4 ("For an angel ...") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ("waiting for the stirring of the water ...") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (14th century), and an Egyptian manuscript. The concluding words of verse 3 but not any of verse 4 appear in D, 33 (9th century), and some Latin manuscripts. The entire italicized passage appears in C (third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), Δ,Θ,Ψ, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts - S,Λ,Π, and a few others - contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. Among the manuscripts that contain this sentence-and-a-half, there are many variations and permutations.[25] The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: "... a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. 5And a certain man was there ...", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. Several modern versions similarly relegate those words to a footnote, and some others (such as Moffatt) include the words in the main text but are enclosed in brackets with an explanation in a footnote.
"Debunked Christianity in Just 1 Minute" when asked about the Trinity he immediately makes the mistake of saying The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit are three seperate Gods. This guy needs to learn what the Trinity is.
Verse have been taken out from the bible Matthew 17:21 KJV: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting." Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in א (original handwriting), B, θ, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Ethiopic manuscripts. It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient - C, D, K, L - as well as some other mss of the ancient versions. It is believed to have been assimilated from Mark.[12] Matthew 18:11 KJV: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost." Reason: This verse is lacking in א, B, L (original handwriting), θ, ƒ1, ƒ13, some old Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Georgian manuscripts, and such ancient sources as the Apostolic Canons, Eusebius, Jerome, and others. It is found in some other sources, not quite so ancient, such as D, K, W, X, and the Latin Vulgate. It is not found in any manuscript before the 5th century.[13] According to Bruce Metzger, "There can be little doubt that the words [...] are spurious here, being omitted by the earliest witnesses representing several textual types... [This verse was] manifestly borrowed by copyists from Luke 19:10."[14] Matthew 23:14 KJV: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation." Reason: This verse is very similar to Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47. This verse is lacking altogether in א,B,D,L,Z,θ, ƒ1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic manuscripts, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. It appears before verse 13 in K,W, and several New Testament minuscules. It appears after verse 13 in ƒ13, some Italic and Syriac and Coptic manuscripts. The fact that it is absent from the most ancient sources of multiple text types and that the sources that do contain the verse disagree about its placement, as well as the fact that it is a repetition of verses found elsewhere, show "that verse 14 is an interpolation derived from the parallel in Mark 12:40 or Luke 20:47 is clear."[14] Mark 7:16 KJV: "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear." Reason: This verse is nearly identical with verses 4:9 and 4:23. This verse here is lacking in א,B,L,Δ (original handwriting), some Coptic mss. It is included in manuscripts only slightly less ancient, A,D,K,W,ƒ1,ƒ13, Italic manuscripts, the Vulgate, some other ancient versions. As it is missing in the very oldest resources and yet is identical to verses that remain, many editors seem confident in omitting its appearance here.[citation needed] Mark 9:44 and 9:46 KJV: "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." (The verses are identical to each other, and to 9:48, which is still in the main text) Reason: Both verses 44 and 46 are duplicates of verse 48, which remains in the text. Verses 44 and 46 are both lacking in א,B,C,L,W,ƒ1, and some manuscripts of the ancient versions, but appear in somewhat later sources such as A,D,K,θ, some Italic manuscripts and the Vulgate. It is possible that verse 48 was repeated by a copyist as an epistrophe, for an oratorical flourish.[15] The UBS text assigns this omission a confidence rating of A. Mark 11:26 KJV: "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses." Reason: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15. This verse appeared in the Complutensian Polyglot and most Textus Receptus editions but Erasmus omitted it and noted that it was missing from 'most' Greek manuscripts.[16] The verse is not in א,B,L,W,Δ,Ψ, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. The UBS edition gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. Mark 15:28 KJV: "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors."" Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. It does not appear here in any New Testament manuscript prior to the end of the 6th century.[17] Luke 17:36 KJV: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left." Reason: It is possible that this verse is a repetition of Matthew 24:40. Even the King James Version had doubts about this verse, as it provided (in the original 1611 edition and still in many high-quality editions) a sidenote that said, "This 36th verse is wanting in most of the Greek copies." This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (1516-1535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st-3rd editions (1546-1550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), the margins of Stephanus' 4th edition (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's editions (1565-1604).[18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20] John 5:3-4 Main article: John 5 § Interpolation (verses 3b-4) KJV: "3[...] waiting for the moving of the water. 4For an Angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had." (Not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.) Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek manuscripts that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [meaning occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the manuscripts that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording.[21] The UBS text gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. This verse was omitted from Edward Harwood's Greek NT (1776), marked as doubtful in Griesbach's editions (1777), and thereafter generally relegated to a footnote, enclosed in brackets, or omitted completely. Henry Alford wrote, "The spuriousness of this controverted passage can hardly be questioned."[22] Without the words at issue the context simply states that a swimming or bathing pool in or near Jerusalem was a gathering place for sick and crippled people, some of whom sought to get into the pool (either for physical comfort or for ritual cleansing) and it was there that Jesus performed miraculous healing. However, the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. This passage in John 5 is the only mention of this pool - no such miraculous pool is mentioned in Josephus or other histories.[23] The words in question do not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and in those manuscripts that contain them they are sometimes marked as doubtful, and differ from manuscript to manuscript "with that extreme variation in the reading which so often indicates grounds for suspicion".[24] The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, א, A (original hand), B, C (original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Verse 4 ("For an angel ...") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ("waiting for the stirring of the water ...") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (14th century), and an Egyptian manuscript. The concluding words of verse 3 but not any of verse 4 appear in D, 33 (9th century), and some Latin manuscripts. The entire italicized passage appears in C (third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), Δ,Θ,Ψ, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts - S,Λ,Π, and a few others - contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. Among the manuscripts that contain this sentence-and-a-half, there are many variations and permutations.[25] The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: "... a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. 5And a certain man was there ...", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. Several modern versions similarly relegate those words to a footnote, and some others (such as Moffatt) include the words in the main text but are enclosed in brackets with an explanation in a footnote.
@@bruhmanthetruthprovider2201 John 5:7-8 Main article: Johannine Comma KJV: "7For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the holy Ghost, and these three are one. 8And there are three that bear witness in earth, ..." Modern versions: (omitted from main text and not in a footnote) Reason: A multitude of books have been devoted to just this verse, including A Vindication of I John V, 7 from the Objections of M. Griesbach [by Thomas Burgess] (1821, London); Das Comma Ioanneum: Auf Seine Hewrkunft Untersucht [The Johannine Comma, an examination of its origin] by Karl Künstle (1905, Frieburg, Switz.); An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture by Sir Isaac Newton (published posthumously 1785); Letters to Mr. Archdeacon [George] Travis in answer to his Defence of the Three Heavenly Witnesses by Richard Porson (1790, London); A New Plea for the Authenticity of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses or Porson's Letters to Travis Eclectically Examined by Rev. Charles Forster (1867, London), Memoir of The Controversy respecting the Three Heavenly Witnesses, I John V.7 ˈ by 'Criticus' [Rev. William Orme] (1830, London), reprinted (1872, Boston, "a new edition, with notes and an appendix by Ezra Abbot" ); and The Three Witnesses - the disputed text in St. John, considerations new and old by Henry T. Armfield (1893, London).[50] Eberhard Nestle, writing in Germany at the end of 19th century, said, "The fact that it [the Comma Johanneum] is still defended even from the Protestant side is interesting only from a pathological point of view."[51] F.H.A. Scrivener, usually regarded as a defender of the KJV text, said of this verse, "The authenticity of [this verse] will, perhaps, no longer be maintained by anyone whose judgment ought to have weight; but this result has been arrived at after a long and memorable controversy, which helped keep alive, especially in England, some interest in Biblical studies."[52] The UBS gives this omission a confidence rating of A. Early Church Fathers did not mention this verse, even when gathering verses to support the Doctrine of the Trinity.[53] This verse first appears, not in a New Testament manuscript, but in a fifth century Confession of Faith, and after that it was assimilated into mss of the Latin Vulgate, but it was (because of the lack of Greek documentary support) omitted from the first two "Textus Receptus" printed editions of the New Testament (namely those edited by Erasmus, 1516 and 1519),[54] as well as some other very early Textus Receptus editions, such as Aldus 1518, Gerbelius 1521, Cephalius 1524 and 1526, and Colinaeus 1534.[55] Stephanus (Robert Estienne), in his influential Editio Regia of 1550 (which was the model edition of the Textus Receptus in England),[56] was the first to provide an apparatus showing variant readings and showed this verse was lacking in seven Greek manuscripts.[57] Martin Luther rejected this verse as a forgery and excluded it from his German translation of the Bible while he lived - it was inserted into the text by other hands after his death.[58] The first appearance of the Comma in the main text of a Greek New Testament manuscript is no earlier than the 15th century.[59] Doubts about its genuineness were indicated in printed Greek New Testaments as early as that of the first two editions (1515 and 1519) of Erasmus of Rotterdam, who simply left the verse out because he could not find a Greek manuscript containing it, providing a comment that "this is all I find in the Greek manuscripts".[60] Expressions of doubt also appeared in the edition of Stephen Courcelles (Étienne de Courcelles), in 1658, and from Johann Jakob Griesbach's edition of 1775. Most critical editions relegated the Comma to a footnote or otherwise marked it as doubtful.[61] The American Bible Union,[62] a Baptist organization, omitted this verse from the new English translation of the New Testament it published in 1865. The Roman Catholic Church was slightly more resistant about yielding up this verse; an 1897 decision of the Holy Inquisition forbade a Catholic "to deny or even express doubt about the authenticity of" the Johannine Comma, but this was effectively reversed by a declaration of the Holy Office on June 2, 1927, which allowed scholars to express doubts and even denials of the genuineness of the Comma, tempered by the fact that the Vatican would have the final authority.[63] The 1966 Jerusalem Bible omits the Comma without a footnote. The spurious nature of this verse is so notorious[64] that even the Revised Version of 1881 did not bother to include nor provide a footnote for this verse, and many other modern versions do likewise. Ezra Abbot wrote, "It may be said that the question [of excluding this verse] is obsolete; that the spuriousness of the disputed passage had long been conceded by all intelligent and fair-minded scholars. This is true, but a little investigation will show that great ignorance still exists on the subject among the less-informed in the Christian community."[65] Even the two leading editions of the so-called Majority Text (Robinson & Pierpont, and Hodges & Farstad) omit this verse (the Hodges & Farstad edition acknowledge the 'Textus Receptus' version of this verse in a footnote). Other omitted verses Matthew 20:16 (b) KJV: "16[...] for many be called, but few chosen." Modern versions (RV): (omitted without a footnote). Reason: These familiar words are not in א, B,L,Z, several cursives, Sahidic, and some Boharic and Ethiopic manuscripts, but appear in slightly more recent manuscripts such as C,D,W,θ, and Latin manuscripts. Tischendorff's 1841 Greek NT was reportedly the first printed edition to omit this clause. The same words appear in Matthew 22:14. Mark 6:11 (b) KJV: "11And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the Day of Judgement, than for that city. 12And they went out, and preached that men should repent." RV: (omits second sentence of verse 11). Reason: Many (perhaps most) modern versions emulate the Revised Version and simply omit the sentence in question, without any explanatory comment. This is a complete sentence and yet it did not receive, in the Textus Receptus editions, a verse number of its own. It does not appear here in the majority of important codices, such as א,B,C,D,L,W,Δ,Θ, and Latin, Sahidic, and some Syriac and Boharic manuscripts. It does, however, appear in some significant manuscripts, including ƒ1,13, A, two very old Latin manuscripts, and some Syriac and Boharic manuscripts, and with slight differences in minuscule 33 (9th century). It was already doubted even before the KJV; this sentence does not appear in Wycliff (1380), the Bishops' Bible (1568), and the Rheims (1582). Westcott and Hort omitted it and did not even mention it in their Appendix volume, nor is it mentioned in Scrivener's Plain Introduction to Criticism of the New Testament, nor is it mentioned in Metzger's Commentary, nor does it get even a footnote in the Souter[66][failed verification] or UBS Greek New Testament. Henry Alford's edition of the New Testament includes this sentence in the main text, but bracketed and italicized, with the brief footnote: "omitted in most ancient authorities: probably inserted here from Matthew 10:15."[67] The same two sentences do appear, without any quibbling about their authenticity, in Matthew 10:14-15, and it is plausible that some very early copyist assimilated the sentence into Mark, perhaps as a sidenote subsequently copied into the main text. In any case, its omission from Mark 6:11 does not affect its unchallenged presence in Matthew 10:15. Luke 4:8 (b) KJV: "And Jesus answered and said unto to him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve." Modern versions (RV): (omits the words "Get thee behind me, Satan:"). Reason: The emphasized words, although by now a very familiar quotation, are omitted from the RV and most other modern versions; it was also omitted by the Wycliffe (1380) and Rheims (1582) versions. This clause is not found in א,B,D,L,W,Ξ, ƒ1, several cursives, and Latin, Sahidic, and many Syriac and Boharic manuscripts. It is present in A,Θ,Ψ,ƒ13, and some Italic manuscripts. It is believed probable that the clause was inserted here by assimilation because the corresponding version of this narrative, in Matthew, contains a somewhat similar rebuke to the Devil (in the KJV, "Get thee hence, Satan,"; Matthew 4:10, which is the way this rebuke reads in Luke 4:8 in the Tyndale (1534), Great Bible (also called the Cranmer Bible) (1539), and Geneva (1557) versions), whose authenticity is not disputed, and because the very same words are used in a different situation in Matthew 16:23 and Mark 8:33. The omission of this clause from Luke 4:8 in critical texts is so well-established that no comment about the omission appears in the Appendix to Westcott & Hort, in Scrivener's Plain Introduction to Textual Criticism, or in the UBS New Testament.[citation needed]
I was Christian before watching and I believed in Jesus and Holy Trinity as one God, but now I am still Christian and believe in that even more. My faith in Jesus, God and Holy spirit grows even more and stronger.
@@thislogicfr You don't get to demand very specific verses that would be fitting personally to you lol. Not a Christian at all but trinity and its dynamic is way too obvious in the Bible. Even first century Christians such as Ignatius of Antioch wrote about the deity of Christ, Holy Spirit and of Father yet talked about one God with strict monotheistic interpretation. You don't get to demand aother religion a standard you put on your own, you cannot try to prove a religion looking from a very sided view of another. have you even really studied any theology your life? Can you give me very specific verses on how Quran demands you pray the Salah 5 times a day please? Since it is a pillar of Islam, I would require specific cases on how many times a day, the rakaat of all the Salah and the way to pray them by rules. Also how to take wuduu. These are vital for the religion so please give me the quranic verses specifying its strict rules.
@@thislogicfrread the whole book because if we mention verses for example john 10:30 or Revelation 22:13 or John 8:48-59 but as most Muslims do they will ignore it and interpet it wrongly. That's why I suggest for you to read the Bible because context>verse. I hope you have good day/life. May God bless you sir
"The Quran was revealed by ANGEL Gabriel" 1813 Il Corinthians 11 And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an ANGEL. Galatians 1 But even if we, or an ANGEL from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.
The Bible was never meant to be the "Word of God." It's just a consolidated collection of many different books. The Council of Nicaea, a council of Christian bishops from 1,700 years ago, decided to determine which biblical books were canonical and which were not. They decided to leave out the Apocrypha and the Gnostic writings, despite their contents being highly significant.
Remember, only the wise can get those in, although in books such as Esdras, and the lost book of eden, as well as Enoch, and the book of the Macabees spoke about the messiah (the elect one), Reasoning on the belief in God, and all the other topics that'll help society. As it is written; " My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge " and we all know God gifts wisdom to those he loves. Peace be unto you, Stay safe-bless.
@@deygnymedes9827 not to say only the wise can read them, for, their out and anyone can- but to read them, and the "bible" and to still hold truth to the promises God makes and still hold true to the roots of his word, without taking away or adding to it, and teaching, and informing it to both young and old alike takes someone with a fair bit of wisdom, while making all seem as natural as possible- without religion. If you are able to read them and trace back to everything to the bit called the bible, and hold firm your belief in Yeshua (Jesus) and conversate about what was written and relate it to all aspects in life to even save or open the mind of a non-believer, consider it a blessing because god gives knowledge and wisdom to those he loves- as written in ecclesiasties.
The council of Nicaea did not decide the Canon. The fuck are you even on about? The gnostic writings come 300-400 years after Christ and cannot be traced back to a single Apostle. Nicaea was a council that was called by the Emperor due to Arius, a prominent bishop, saying that Christ was not begotten but made. He said that he was still the Son of God but not eternal. It doesn’t help your case. Stop watching online scam artists.
It is a myth that the council of Nicaea chose the books of the Bible. The council of Nicaea didn't even talk about the Canon. That was the council of Carthage if I remember right. The council of Nicaea was organized by Constantine to answer the question about Aryan and if his views were heretical. He did so in order to unify the church. The church though, condemned him outright which was against Constantine's hopes. He was disappointed. Constantine's sister was an Ayrian and convinced him to become one also. The myths about Constantine are prevalent but they are myths, in this regard.
The father who created the whole universe, The son who teach us how to live like and The holy spirit who stay with us for blessing all time. There are not 3 gods, there is only one god who has three faces. thank you🙂
Uh... isn't god capable of doing all 3? and his "son" is not a god and it's not "his son" , We muslims believe that Jesus was a messenger of god like many others
@@xKuusouka many others? so everyone born with only mortal mothers? everyone one had holy spirit? everyone mentioned as sinless and the most purest creature? they have the title as word of god and spirit of god?! you even dont know the quran! quran claiming how jesus is part of the god! because he is the word and the spirit of the god! non of other prophets has this nor holy spirit nor word! even quran claiming how jesus is who will judge the humanity in the last day and evne how he will be the only one who will defeat the evil in the last day! not muhammed nor others!
As a Christian, I have two issues that really prevent me from ever converting to Islam. In the first sourates it is written that the Quran is a book coming from God even Though we know Mohamed could not have written the Quran himself and that the Quran was written by his successor after oral transmission from Mohamed. That means that some sourates don't come from the mouth of the prophet Mohamed? Why is it "this book" and not"these words"? The Quran is crystal clear, the Arabic "ktb" means book and nothing else. The whole Jesus case is really disturbing. If he was not crucified then the purpose of his messianic mission is not fulfilled. Islam does not only reject the divinity of Jesus Christ but also his title of Messiah, because he would not fulfill what the prophets of the old testament said about the messiah. I struggle to understand a Christ who was not crucified, and who will come for destroying the christians in the laterdays.
Jesus Chris fulfilled his duty, every prophet that came to this planet. Had 1 mission, which is to deliver the message which is to worship God only and not associate with him partners. God is perfect and he doesn't need another creature to be perfect. Which is why only he deserves to be worshipped. AND DO not lie! Jesus in Islam is described as the messiah(AL-MASIH in arabic) Just like God saved prophet Jonah, Abraham, many other prophets. He saved Jesus! yall claim to love Jesus but yall dont even follow MOST of his teachings!! You guys follow the church and not read your own bible. most of christians are not circumcised/consume alcohol, drugs/gambling/and tons of other major sins one of them is allowing LGBTQ to get married and have rights. Jesus own mother may God be pleased with her, has a whole chapter in the Quran and she is highly respected. We just dont believe she is divine. If Jesus is divine cause he was born miraculously then Adam is Divine, Yahya(John the baptist) is divine.... those are all human beings, they are dependent ! they depend on food, sleepiness, etc to live ! God is beyond all that, to associate partners with him is very disrespectful, thats why he forgives all sins(if you repent) except associating partners with him
@@youmysonbish DO you read bible? I show you scripture from Bible about Jesus Will you accept it or Still just call it corrupt? Bible claim him to be God and every knee will bow and confess him as lord. I know you muslim normally you do not read just recite what People say.
@@ZaynElAbideen but that is the very thing that i don't understand. When the prophet Muhammad told, because he was speaking to his companions and not reading or writing, saying "This book is...", well, but there was no book at the moment he was speaking. The book came after. Did he assumed that someone was going to write down his words? Why is it referred as a book and not as "words" or "speech"? At the moment the prophet Muhammad was speaking, there was no book, but words. I find it very very confusing.
@@D-03IbrahimSiddiqi I saw his beautiful gown and he was so bright. The room was so bright. He is so beautiful . So nice. When I was there I was at home. Most of my life I felt like I don't belong and most people didn't like me. I didn't wanna come back because it was so beautiful there. Best experience ever
@@ziproxyy 2 simple examples. Moon didn't split. Jesus was crucified.. and if he was not, your god is a liar and a deceiver because he led billions of people to hell by letting them think that it wasnt Jesus but someone who looked like him...crazy stuff..
@@RealDamianXD 2 simple examples. Moon didn't split. Jesus was crucified.. and if he was not, your god is a liar and a deceiver because he led billions of people to hell by letting them think that it wasnt Jesus but someone who looked like him...crazy stuff..
@@shroomitechromee"How shall Allah guide a people who disbelieved after their belief and had witnessed that the Messenger is true and clear signs had come to them? And Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people." Quran 3:86
@@teatusnoone6332 Who's YHWH? Why did he pray like a muslim then? ‘he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father’ (Matthew 26:39) ‘During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.’ (Hebrews 5:7) ?
May Allah SWT bring ease in your efforts.. As and when I watch any of your videos, I get so happy and enlightened that sincere duas for you come out from my heart .. God bless you all..
@@iluvucuzjesus5347 What ever, but the fact is Ali Dawah is one of those, whom Allah SwT Himself chose to get to Hidayat. So to Allah SWT, he must be a special person.. It hardly matters, what people think and say about a person..
![GEEK TIMË [OFFICIAL AUDIO]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ry-6RvkH880/mqdefault.jpg)
It's not the eyes that are blind but the heart.💯
*No Muslim knows whether Allah is a Trinity or not* tell us! Is Allah a being of 0 persons like a pencil!
tell us! Is Allah a being of one person like a man!
tell us! Is Allah a being of several persons?
Bet you say you don't know = your statements are just empty claims!
😂
@@Hannestv4607 Allah swt is not human and not trinity.
He is made of light.
QURAN SURAH AN NUR :35
35. “Allah is the Light of the heavens and the earth. The similitude of His light is as a niche wherein is a lamp. The lamp is in a glass. The glass is as it were a glittering star, lit from a blessed olive-tree, neither of the East nor of the West, whose oil would almost glow forth (of itself) though no fire touched it. Light upon light, Allah guides unto His Light whom He pleases, and Allah sets forth similitudes for mankind, and Allah is All-Aware of all things.”
And not like a pencil, the creator is not like his creation.
Hope that answers your question.
Feel free to ask more questions, islam promotes using logic and not following blindly.
Also islam has the answers to every question.
@@jesbinjohn4006 are these three entities dependant on each other?
If answer YES then how can the creator be dependent AND BE GOD at the same time?
If answer NO then why did Jesus ask father for help?
Hmm
The only thing Muslims can say is "Allah is One!" So no one can say how many persons or hypostases Allah consists of! 0 or 1 or more nobody knows! no muslim knows whether Allah is a trinity or not!
He's understanding of the trinity really shows that people will only believe what they want to believe
It’s simple to understand but makes no sense
Like a criminal who ma. reed. With slaves, and underrage
And claimed to be a prophet
@@asapzak6554 it has sense but your god is not omnipotent and this is the reason why for you it has no sense...
@@gipsymelody1268 What do you mean XD. Our god is omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent.
i never heard a Christian in my intire life saying that they do not need the bible.
I've heard many say it after actually reading or studying it but it doesn't make sense how they can still be Christian then
@@nunya54 if someone says that means they are not Christian
All the people who follow the Bible never read the book and never try to understand it. Clearly, the Bible states that women should cover their hair (i.e., wearing a hijab), should not drink alcohol, should not eat pork, should not fornicate, should not commit adultery, should worship God by prostrating. Yet, from what I know and see, Christians clearly oppose these teachings of the Bible. What is this? Do I need to be an idiot to be a Christian?
I heard many and I ask them why, they say they've, A met Jesus, B asked for a sign and got it or some other theistic belief about Christianity
I have heard sooo many
This guy said Matthew never met Jesus ? Matthew was working as a tax collector at a tax booth when he met Jesus. The gospel explains that Jesus simply said, ''Follow me,'' and Matthew immediately decided to follow him and be a disciple.
There is no Biblical scholar that says Matthew or any other gospel writer met Jesus. They did not.
None of them met Jesus lmao! Bible is based on unknown writers.. so if i tell u i piss purple fruitjuice u have to believe it as well since im an unknown author of this comment ❤
@@nunya54How to say you don’t know anything about New Testment history without telling me you don’t know anything about New Testament history:
Please, do tell me which Biblical scholars say those writers knew Jesus. For some reason, many Christians can often tell people they don't know what they're talking about but can never actually offer any proof otherwise. I've been asking for years. None has been provided yet. I welcome those names and quotes from you@@HerrHamzus
@@HerrHamzus
Bishop Faustus: “It is certain that the New Testament was not written by Christ himself, nor by his apostles, but a long while after them, by some unknown persons, who, lest they should not be credited when they wrote of affairs they were little acquainted with, affixed to their works the names of the apostles, or of such as were supposed to have been their companions, asserting that what they had written themselves, was written according to these persons to whom they ascribed it .” (Faust, lib. 2. Quoted by Rev. R. Taylor: Diegesis, p. 114.)
Jonathan Morrow: . . . this Gospel is technically anonymous." However, when it comes to the four Gospels, there is no one specifically to defend (i.e., because it is technically anonymous).
Martin Hengel: According to Mark” were used much earlier than previously suspected (Studies in the Gospel of Mark [Minneapolis: Fortress, 1985], 64-84). These titles were added sometime before the end of the first century, prompted most likely by the presence of two or more gospels that needed to be distinguished.
Bill Mounce: It would have been nice if there were ancient publishers that had statements of authorship and dates of writing, but there weren't. Rather, we must rely on scant historical evidence, but in the case of the Gospels the evidence is not really that scant. We can comfortably believe that the traditional authorship of the four Gospels is accurate, and that means Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were in a place to know who Jesus was, what he did and what he taught.
Dr. W Graham Scroggie, Moody Bible institute, Chicago, one of the most prestigious Christian evangelical missions in the world: “It is human, yet divine”; “...Yes, the Bible is human, although some out of zeal which is not according to knowledge, have denied this. Those books have passed through the minds of men, are written in the language of men, were penned by the hands of men and bear in their style the characteristics of men....”
Kenneth Cragg, the Anglican Bishop of Jerusalem,. . . Not so the New testament . . . There is condensation and editing; there is choice reproduction and witness. The Gospels have come through the mind of the church behind the authors. They represent experience and history.....” (The Call of the Minaret”)
Dan Wallace, conservative Christian textual scholar, Dallas Theological Seminary: Scholars have for a long time recognized that the Gospel writers *shape* their narratives, including the sayings of Jesus. A comparison of the Synoptics reveals this on almost every page.
David. M. Carr, Union Theological Seminary, Colleen M. Conway, Seton Hall Univeristy: All four of the canonical gospels were originally anonymous. It was only in the second century CE, when the four gospels were published a a collection that the superscriptions were added to the gospels, attributing authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John respectively. This is also the time that traditions begin to appear about the authors, claiming that they were either original apostles of Jesus or close acquaintances of other well-known apostles. in spite of these attributions, most scholars do not think any of these men were the original gospel writers. None of the gospels is written in a style that suggests the authors was present at the events being narrated. Nor is it likely that the disciples of Jesus were able to write in Greek, the language in which the gospels were written. So we are left with the reality that the gospels were written by anonymous Christians decades after the events that they relate.
Dr. Dale Martin, Yale University: The four Gospels were published anonymously… they seem to have been written with no authors names attached. We don’t know how or when these names were attached to these Gospels’ that is lost to history.
Dr. David E. Aune, University of Notre Dame: The four Gospels were written anonymously between A.D. 70 and 100, and assembled into a collection about A.D. 125. The authors did not provide them with titles, others added them later.
Dr. Ben Witherington, Asbury Theological Seminary: Formally speaking, all four canonical Gospels are anonymous since their authors names are not mentioned anywhere within the context of the verses themselves… The superscript of each of the four Gospels is not an original part of the document.. it was likely later appended to the scroll for identification.
Raymond E. Brown, PhD, Catholic Biblical scholar: The view that the evangelists were not themselves eyewitnesses of the public ministry of Jesus would be held in about 95% of contemporary [biblical] scholarship. The designation that you find in your New Testament, such as "the Gospel According to Matthew" are the results of late-second-century scholarship attempting to identify the authors of words that had no identification. No evangelist indicated who he was.
The original copies of the New Testament books have long since disappeared. Even the true identity of their authors is to a large extent a matter of debate. The time gap between the original accounts of the events and today's surviving manuscripts is a period of over 200 to 300 years. Before this time no written witnesses are available to establish the authenticity of Christian claims. With the exception, that is, of tiny papyrus fragments from the Gospel of John (three verses) and (so its is claimed) from the Gospel of Mark. Because of their fragmentary nature, they are of no great value in establishing the texts of even these two Gospels, let alone the New Testament as a whole. (The Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible)
James D.G. Dunn, Emeritus Professor of Divinity in the Department of Theology at University of Durham, Minister of the Church of Scotland and Methodist preacher says "But if we are to submit our speculations to the text and build our theology only with the bricks provided by careful exegesis we cannot say with any confidence that Jesus knew himself to be divine, the pre-existent Son of God." (Christology in the Making: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Doctrine of the Incarnation)
I'm a 16 year old Christian who has had many conversations about Islam and Christianity with Muslim friends lately. Thank you for making this video, it has made my believe in Jesus even stronger!
Still trinity is pagan
Me too MashaAllah 😂
@@IndieBeggining he meant jesus of the bible... not the coward con man in ur Quran
@@BlackJ1234 I'm Christian
@@IndieBeggining ur a trinitarian christian?... coz they also use pagan beliefs
Thank you for making this video. I was atheist and I am now Christian. Glory be to God.
how bad is bro's debate that he made an atheist to a Christian?😭 W bro
@@dicegamez8216 lol
lol bro's mad btw how does a god die?
@@CryOfFearBez I dont see how hes mad but Jesus Christ died because he turned fully human when he came to earth. Him diying was fully controlled and he could have gone back to heaven at any time but he decided to die and suffer for our sins .
Underated comment ! 😅
As a Christian, I must say you answered these questions very level headedly, and each argument sounds believable. But you missed some small details in a few of your answers, and if I may, I would like to defend my faith and address them:
1. If anything in creation cannot be God, but God can do all things, is it or is it not in his power to take on a human body and interact with his creation?
2. I do not know if the Quran copied from the bible, but I do know that the Bible was originally written in Hebrew and Greek; whenever something is translated, it is not possible to translate it perfectly, synonyms in one language do not mean quite the same in another. For example, in greek there are multiple terms for love; agape = self-sacrificing love, philia = friendship love, eros = erotic love, and several more, but English only has "love" to describe all of them. Why not the same for pharoah and king, are they not both terms for rulers? I do not think a simple translation issue is a strong enough argument, you would have to go back to the original text of both works to have an argument that is worth something.
3. The books of the bible has always been 73 since the Synod of Hippo in 393 CE to now, nothing has been added, and nothing has been taken out (at least in the catholic bible). There was some confusion in the 16th century about the deuterocanonical books being inspired or not (and thus are not in the protestant bible), but archaeological findings of the Dead Sea Scrolls are just one proof that they are indeed inspired.
4. If the Christian faith was a farce, how are there historical accounts of Jesus and his disciples from an unaffiliated Jewish historian, Josephus, and at least two Roman historians, Tacitus and Tranquillas, who wrote about the events happening in Judea and Rome at that time?
5. I completely agree with you on this one. It is wrong that different Christians have rejected the bible. The bible and the traditions passed down with it are the cornerstones of our faith. You cannot reject the bible and still be a good Christian, because then where is your guide?
6. I would also agree with you here, it is unfortunate that on average we as Christians do not know our faith well. But there are the few of us who do.
I hope this was not too long, and I do hope you don't mind. Thank you for being considerate and reading what I had to say.
On the translations, I believe he is referring to the various versions of the Bible that have been published. For example, the King James Bible is written as King James VI and I wanted it to read like, purposefully mistranslating words from original literature so that his rule would not be criticized or questioned. So the argument becomes, if the truth has been presented to you, why is there a need for so many versions of the same truth, in order for everyone to accept it? While works can be translated across languages to varying levels of accuracy, it begs the question why there is one Quran, yet so many versions of the Bible in its working, irrespective of language and entirely focusing on what is written?
nicely said
I think I get what you're saying; why do we have so many versions of the Bible but only one Quran. That can be explained if you go back to the 15th century before the Protestant Reformation. For 1500 years, up until the PR, there was only one "edition" of the Bible that was preserved by the nuns and monks in the monasteries, and this edition is the same one Catholics currently use - not the King James Edition. But the video wasn't talking about that, it was talking about inconsistencies in translation, which is not a good argument as there are many words that mean similar things. Just as if I said "I would like a glass of milk" could also be written as "The person who is formulating this text has a thirst for the nectar of the bovine species." They both mean the same thing, the only difference is the choice of words. All I was saying was that the video's translation argument was not an argument at all, just a misunderstanding of how language works. @@penguinbabeez
If God is able to do everything, can God cease to exist or create another God more powerful than him?
No he cannot - there is a principal in metaphysics (a branch of philosophy) that states that no effect can be greater than its cause, in other words something cannot give what it does not have. For example, a human cannot give birth to a dog because it does not have a dog's dna. This principal also works in the reverse, something cannot come from something lesser. Dogs cannot be created from trees, because animals are higher beings than plants.
The same principle can be applied to God: if God is indeed All powerful, he cannot create something with More power because that would imply he was lacking something that this new god has. This contradicts the principal stated above because that would mean that God is giving something he does not have. But we just said that he is ALL powerful and not lacking in anything.
So no, God cannot create a being more powerful than himself as that would be a negating his title of All powerful. @@HaFii23
Was an atheist. After a lot of research and study i was Confirmed and baptised this week. This video is clear that Ali has zero idea about christianity.
"... Ali has zero idea about christianity." - LOL - While that may be true, the majority of so-called & self-proclaimed "Christians" also know zero, to very little, about their faith ("Christianity). The majority of what they think they know has been 'spoon fed' to them by "pastors" / "ministers" / Sunday School "teachers" / the institutional "church" / etc... Very few take the time and effort necessary to research and verify what they are being fed by their "leaders".
U were atheist ? Lol why u christians resort to lies u never been atheist u were christian and still one
🙏🏼
Proud of you
The heavens are joyous with you !!!🕊🕊🕊✝️✝️✝️❤️❤️❤️👑👑👑
Bro christians having a field day with this one 💀
Right?? It's easy to debate with the muslims but we must have a respectful manner with them as God tells us to.
@@crusaderknight6928Is that soo...... Then go try debating with a imam and see what response you get.
@@Daslolx1 You think I'll cave when things get heated?? That's cute lol.
@@Daslolx1why don't you debate with me
I will give you my dis cord
Wanna debate little kid ?
@@Daslolx1yall always say to debate with an imam. You guys are sheep to the devil.
"we dont know who matthew mark luke and john is"
bro what 💀
It's true. No one knows who they are. The majority of Biblical scholars attest to this.
isn't funny how we know where they lived, what languages they spoke, and their life. Peter and Andrew: Where two fisherman, and were brothers. Lived in a town, Bethsaida, on the shore of the sea of galilee. They were wealthy business mean, (known because of the old equipment found scattered across the shore, used for fish business in that time). Peter was a crucial part of the early church, and was crucified upside down. Andrew, scourged then crucified. During the roman empire, Latin and greek were dominantly spoken. In the eastern byzantine empire, where Peter and Andrew lived, speaking and writing in greek were the most dominant. Peter, whos first name was Simon, came from Hebrew roots, but Andrew, the name came from Greek roots; thus providing evidence greek was spoken in the family; and the writing of the scriptures attest to this. @@nunya54
@@nunya54which scholar lmao, there’s a literal authentic chain stemming from the church father aranaius, who was a disciple of polycarp, who was an eye and ear witness of the apostle john
The overwhelming majority of Biblical scholars. There are actually no authentic chains from anyone who wrote the Bible back to Jesus. No one who wrote the Bible was an ear or eyewitness to Jesus. Their ideas don't even agree with the beliefs of the first Christians (or with each other in places). That's why the gospels have never been authenticated. There is no chain back to Jesus and the John, Matthew, Mark and Luke are not known. Those manuscripts were originally anonymous@@nickg2436 They
St. Irenaeus on the authority of Polycarp also said he heard from St. John himself, that Jesus was not crucified at the time stated in the gospels but lived to be nearly fifty years old in Against Heresies. He also invented stories about other people rising from the dead to convince people Jesus did. Many Church fathers were known to lie to further Christianity and would not record the whole truth. Other gospels as well were destroyed. The original gospels as well were not seen as divine. As Luke says, they were just the writings of those who thought it good to write.
The manuscripts of John have a mysterious origin and the first we know about them and evidence points to him being the author of them. The gospel of John doesn't say who John is. Christianity
We actually do, unlike MOOhamed which earliest accounts are 200 years after his death when the Quran was compiled by uthman lol, many people don’t even think he was a real person lol…….@@nickg2436
"Who do I pray to Holy Spirit or the Father" - praying to the Son, is the same as praying to the Father, just as Jesus says "if you have seen me, you have seen the Father"
Why would God create a human version of himself and allow himself to die. This does not show his power but shows his weakness.
For where two or three are come together in my name, there am I among them. MATTHEW 18:20
@@twig4693 Jesus was the only one that lived a perfect life without sin so he became that sacrifice for all of us so that through Jesus, we can have a relationship with God. Our weakness is sin because we fall into the same trap again & again so this shows his power, not his weakness.
@@twig4693 Nobody has managed to fulfil the OLD law, God wouldn't just free us so instead He sent His only Son our LORD Jesus Christ to earth to fulfil the law be the messiah and do what none of us could do
@@LakeErie_cirE So it means that you can commit any sin, spread corruption in the land, commit war crimes, kill innocents, lie, cheat, or do anything negative imaginable; God will forgive you because Jesus died without sins/died as a sacrifice? Seriously? Why do you punish people for crimes? Just forgive them, Jesus died for those criminals too I guess.
was an Atheist and i was actually leaned towards islam, while getting as much information to debate Christians. i ended up becoming a christian.
You were an athiest and now you lean to Islam , did you find evidence for God ? Or you were non-religious but still believe in a creator
what prayer is the nikah of 3rd december ramadan?
@@wsaid_7912read his comment he is not saying he's "Muslim" now
@@ScottBanj He said he was was still learning about islam meaning he still wasnt a fully developed muslim. Also to me this sounds like buull crap
@@ScottBanjI think it's just bunch of salty Christians didn't like what they heard
I’m a 16 year old Christian. I’ve been having doubts about Jesus, now, I will die for Jesus. He is King. He is God. And my faith with breath inside of me until the day that I die. Thank you for this video.
is jesus is god then he should know everything
but jesus doesnt know the hour
Typical brainwashed Christian behaviour 😂😂
‘he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father’ (Matthew 26:39)
‘During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.’ (Hebrews 5:7)
Your Jesus prayed like a Muslim and if he is god, who did he pray to?
John 20:17 "Jesus saith to her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father; but go to my brethren, and say to them, I ascend to my Father and your Father, and to my God and your God."
@@freezedupfrost6064Wallahi they are so blind. It’s actually kind of scary when you talk to the Christian’s bc they are brainwashed.
@@freezedupfrost6064 first of all, jesus is the son the father is in heaven, he prayed to the father because he was god in human flesh with human needs, people where struggling with sin so much that almost no one could enter heaven, god saw that and thats why he put jesus on earth, he bled out on the cross for us to wash away our sins, god put human him on earth so that he could wash our sins away and that we would be forgiven for our sins, also the bible says he is one with the father
@@yggggguug877 Yup I know the father of Jesus is god and Jesus is not god. That's exactly what you just said.
And this is exactly what it's written in the Qur'an, Jesus was the messenger of Allah who was sent to save the people and offering them paradise. Jesus never says he is god and never asked anybody to worship him.
So many contradictions in this response...
It’s disappointing to see how the world can deceive people from the truth ✝️
Islam is a big lie covered up with lies.Listen to (Christian Prince debates) on RUclips to really learn how crazy Islam really is
I was thinking the same thing brother
What contradictions
@@Pipodecatan S 6:115 no one can change Allah's words(there's one)
@@runemaster1054 Nono,I mean what contradictions is the guy with the fish picture talking about
1 Corinthians 1:18
18 For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
Thank you lord🙏🙏🙏🙏
Bible is white supremacy
amen
Alcohol is a hell of a drug.
O People of the Scripture, do not commit excess in your religion or say about Allah except the truth. The Messiah, Jesus the son of Mary, was but a messenger of Alläh and His word which He directed to Mary and a soul [created at a command] from Him. So believe in Alläh and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better for you. Indeed, Alläh is but one God.
Exalted is He above having a son. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And sufficient is Alläh as Disposer of affairs. (4:171)
The Messiah would never be too proud to be a servant of Allah, nor would the angels nearest to Allah. Those who are too proud and arrogant to worship Him will be brought before Him all together. (4:172)
As for those who believe and do good, He will reward them in full and increase them out of His grace. But those who are too proud and arrogant, He will subject them to a painful punishment. And besides Allah they will find no protector or helper.(4:173)
@@Anonymously1648 we don't believe in Allah and your last messanger. You should respect others belief if you want them to respect yours. Happy Christmas because Jesus came to save us🎄
I was struggling with my faith in Christianity, But after hearing your video you just solidified it.
Clearly blindhearted u are scared that u have to change u can’t denie the truth but believe me I will reject at judgement day
If this solidifies your faith even more, then you are as dumb as a rock
So listening to logical arguments makes you believe in lies more?
@@Ali17__nothing here was logical. His main arguments are I'm to dumb to understand the holy trinity therefore not real. And look guys at a historical inaccuracy yet ignores the many in the qu'ran
@@Giggleheaven his argument wasn't "I'm too dumb to understand it" it was "the trinity doesn't make sense"
and there is no historical inaccuracy in the Quran.
Many issues with these arguments that I could answer as a Christian but I’ll answer the easiest one. How do we know about Jesus without the Bible? Well we certainly know about his Death and Crucifixion. Roman historian Tacitus recorded it in his work Annals, book 15, chapter 44 written in 116 AD. A non Christian historian confirmed his life, prosecution under Pilate, and his Crucifixion.
I will suggest you to read Quran to clear all confusions about his crucifixion
*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!*
To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!
Hebr 1,2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, *by whom also he made the worlds;*
as everyone can see the term Son of God refers to the Word of God = god himself! For through that God created the worlds! *what a mistake in the Qur'an!*
@@solalux5763 ah yes read a source that came 600 years after the crucifixion that claims Jesus isn't God, the crucifixion was a hoax and drop everything and follow a pedophile who was married to a 6 year old but don't worry, God sent him , this will clear up confusion
All religions presented themselves as Llies when they denied Jesus his sacrifice!
God is holy and therefore inevitably always righteous. So God can never be merciful, gracious, because grace is not justice and therefore is wrong! A holy God can only be holy if he Never does wrong !! So Fact is without Jesus his SACRIFICE out of love for us we would all be lost! Only YHWH is not lying when he says he is HOLY and merciful! Who is YHWH equal? Exactly no one!!
JESUS gave himself as a sin offering !! A pure life for a life !! Because we have to be holy = without guilt otherwise God will judge us fair and just !! Jesus is YHWH and thus the Creator of everything and thus has the weight to wash the whole creation clean with these pure lives (Blood) !! God bless you
Which true Christian rejected the Bible? This is madness!
yeah right there are very less true Cristian i am 90% sure you probably support lgbt
You don’t need to label your self as a Christian, just read the Bible for what it says all religions are made to deceive and all have a splash of truth.
The Christian church borrows way more catholic teachings than you think.
The truth is in the Bible don’t get coughed up in these worldly religions
If you want a good sores of truth look up kingdom in context RUclips
Your Bible tells you Jesus prayed like Muslims, go do it 👍
"And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as you will"
Matthew 26:39
That also says by word that Jesus will is not God's will, how can you make them the same?
@@RbccaFaith Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, but every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.
1 Corinthians 11:4-7,
You are misinterpreted the verse. Read the whole book and not out of context.
@@moh6734 if you are referring to Jesus fell on his face praying to the Father. You are wrong in every way. He did not pray every 5 times daily. And spoke gibberish.
If he did Pray like the Muslim, since the Quran was written 500 to 600 years after, then Muslims are praying like Jesus? Lol
Problem I have is that he 'debunked" the trinity using Islamic lenses
I want this ali dawah to debate with Christian Prince 👌
@@hikandaykan1279 That boy David Wood?
@@lukain4640 the day that u Muslim will know that imran is not the father of mary that day u will open u mouth with me.
And by the way u know that.. ali yeah yeah dawah and golden shower mimi hijab will never beat CP so stop acting ...💩🤡
@@lukain4640 that yute got smashed
How so? I thought it was rather the opposite
OH MY!!! THANK YOU SO MUCH. AFTER SEEING THIS VIDEO, I WENT FROM A CHRISTIAN TO A EVEN STRONGER CHRISTIAN!!!! THANK YOU GOD FOR BRINGING ME TODAY🙏🙏🙏
Amen🙏🏼
ok you beleive in christinaity right, i haVe found COUNTLESS ERRORS IN THE BIBLE
NO.1 = IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DOES IT SAY NO ONE KNOWS OF THE HOUR OTHER THAN THE FATHER, WHICH MEANS JESUS DOES NOT KNWO EVERYTHING, AND THERFORE NOT OMNISCINET AND IS NOT GOD!!!
IF U WANT MORE I'LL GIVE U MORE
@@islamwhispers Before reading this reply, pls make sure you're open minded and not just here to debate bcuz that won't get us anywhere. Now to answer your question: Him being God, does NOT mean that He's the Heavenly Father....Notice how He says "No one knows of the hour other than the FATHER" (Key word: ), the Father is God and so is Jesus Christ. Which means they have the same Spiritual essence. Different Persons, yes. But the same Spiritual nature. Bcuz God is a Spirtiual Being, every Person in the Godhead has a different purpose, think of it as an entire body "If the foot should say, 'Because I am not a hand, I am not of the body,' is it therefore not of the body?" (verse: I Corinthians 12:15) Hope this answers your questions. Feel free to ask another one, not to debate Christians, but to learn about what they believe in.
And do NOT forget: Not understanding ≠ Error. But it's good you're reading the Holy Bible.....even if it's to look for "mistakes"
@@islamwhispers If Allah created Jesus, why would he allow people to believe He is God (Jesus was before Prop. Muhammad).
@@islamwhispers Why would Allah allow Jesus to be crucified? You say he was a prophet, why was Biblical things real? I thought Allah would want people to worship him, why would he allow Jesus to be worshipped?
Why was I able easily debunk all of this guys arguments if anything this video made my faith in Jesus stronger. Thanks man and God bless.
nah dude, you cannot respond to these arguments even.
honestly I would love to see you debunk him
debunk it if you know
Watch the video where Sam shamoun reacted to this video
He destroys him
ok you beleive in christinaity right, i haVe found COUNTLESS ERRORS IN THE BIBLE
NO.1 = IF JESUS IS GOD, WHY DOES IT SAY NO ONE KNOWS OF THE HOUR OTHER THAN THE FATHER, WHICH MEANS JESUS DOES NOT KNWO EVERYTHING, AND THERFORE NOT OMNISCINET AND IS NOT GOD!!!
IF U WANT MORE I'LL GIVE U MORE
Honestly after watching the video then running to the comments and reading them, I want to say Thank you Ali Dawah! You made us Christians stronger in our faith more than before :) This video got to be watched by every Christian who has doubts, because it will only get them closer to Christianity.
the real killer to the trinity is this : According to the trinity, jesus was FULLY GOD and FULLY HUMAN at the same time whilst on earth. If you don't agree with this, you're committing a heresy. Also according to the bible, Jesus did not know the hour whilst he was on earth. As God is all knowing, that means that it is logically impossible for Jesus to have been fully God whilst on earth, hence the trinity is incorrect.
Dude u make no sense and numbers don’t lie A religion that keep changing its principles by accepting homosexuality.. and other clear transgressions will only keep disappearing. You barely see Christianity in the west any ways
christian theology is complete nonsense, it's a wonder it even became the most adhered to religion @@Shazz288
by being fully God, it mostly talks about his divinity. Because he was also fully human, he had the limitations of a human, so he couldn't know the the hour@@dresdi
a necessary part of divinity is being all knowing, you cannot have full divinity without knowing the hour + everything else. it is literally a logical error. There is no way to get around this, you cannot be God or divine in anyway unless you have all the features that make God God, unless you want to claim that jesus is some type of 'demigod'
Literally everything he said was wrong💀
Re-watch the video with an open-mind.
@@Aiden_Muslim Look at the objections with an open-mind.
@@hans8025 "Literally everything he said was wrong 💀"
Nice objection.
@@Aiden_Muslim Or rather rewatch the video and see the ignorance for yourself , this man made his OWN VERSION of Christianity, that he proceeds to debunk non that nonsense apply to actual Christians you guys don’t understand our beliefs you simply try to Argue and disprove because you know that if the Bible and christianity is right , then Islam is a big embarrassing lie .... An example is all muslims are given rehearsed questions to blast Christians with but we Christians don’t even waste our time with nonsense like that when there’s people who need salvation not arguments. Secondly even the Quran doesn’t understand Christianity showing that Muhammad was like Ali Dawah Ignorant proceeding to claim the trinity included MARY , why would the TRUE LITERAL word of God butcher something like that ?? Only Muslims will ever know
@@Aiden_Muslim nah sorry. Not Muslim, Not Christian but he just debunks a made up Christianity he shaped from his own Islamic lens. I can't see this video convincing anyone out of Christianity. Most things he argued about are baseless and are basic strawmen.
Before watching this I was a Christian, and now after watching this in its entirety I am even more certain of my Christian Faith! Thank you and praise Jesus
Well said. I, too, feel stronger in my Christian faith because Jesus is my God and Saviour and no one can replace Jesus.
What is your evidence from your Holy Book that Jesus Christ, peace be upon him, is God?
Did he say, “I am God,” or did someone say to him, “Oh God?”
Did he say, “Worship me,” or did he say, “I am the one who created you, provided for you, gave you life, and caused you to die,” or did someone say to him, “O our Creator, our Sustainer, and the Administrator of our affairs?”
You say that God was incarnated in the image of Christ, peace be upon him
Did he tell you that I am God incarnate? Is this dangerous matter that results in entering Heaven or Hell not worth mentioning?
Aren't his words supposed to be clear so that there is no excuse for anyone to say: I did not understand that from him because he did not say it explicitly?
You say that God was incarnated in the image of Christ, peace be upon him
Did he tell you that I am God incarnate? Is this dangerous matter that results in entering Heaven or Hell not worth mentioning?
Aren't his words supposed to be clear so that there is no excuse for anyone to say: I did not understand that from him because he did not say it explicitly?
Bro...... Wth XD
When you're talking to a Christian..
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
Q: Is Jesus the son of Mary?
A: Yes,
Q: Who created Mary?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
God Jesus was born from the mother he created(Mary)
Q: Is Jesus a born son?
A: Yes,
Q: Who is his father?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
God Jesus is the father of God Jesus and the creator of the mother he was born from hes the son of his wife
Q: Is Jesus the servant of God?
A: Yes,
Q: Did Jesus die on the cross?
A: Yes,
Q: And for whom did he go up?
A: To God
God Jesus was crucified & ascended to God Jesus
Q: Is Jesus a messenger?
A: Yes,
Q: Who sent him?
A: God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
God Jesus was the messenger of God Jesus. God sends himself as a messenger of himself
Q: Did Jesus pray when he was alive?
A: Yes,
Q: Whom was he praying for?
A: For God
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
God Jesus worships God Jesus himself
Q: Does God have a beginning?
A: No
Q: So who was born on December 25th?
A: Jesus
Q: Who is God?
A: Jesus
God Jesus is eternal before everything but he was born in 25th Dec
Q: Where is God?
A: In Heaven
Q: How many Gods are there in Heaven?
A: God is only one.
Q: Where is Jesus sitting?
A: He is sitting on the right of God.
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So how many Gods are there in Heaven?
A: Only one God
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting to the right of God.
Q: So how many gods are there in Heaven?
A: Only one god. Still
Q: Is Jesus a God?
A: Yes
Q: So how many seated gods are there?
A: Only one God,
Q: Where is Jesus?
A: He is sitting next to the god.
Q: How many gods are there in heaven?
A: Only one.
Q: Are they sitting on the same chair?
A: These words are understood only by the one who has the holy spirit.
God sacrificed God to God in order to save God's creation from God.
God prayed to God for help but God didn't help God, and God killed God with help from humans.
And that God is a father of himself and the mother of himself and the son of mother he created at the same time. He is also eternal but his birthday is...
Lol nice
Very nice
Very nice my brother 👍😂😊
See, you cant take any of them seriously after that.
@@Tzimiskes3506 over the throne. but you how about you explain my comment?
He created a strawman and debunked the strawman. I pray to God, he meets some real believers.
You are an emotional brainwashed person , not logical who accept the truth
Indeed
What is the strawman?
Nearly every argument he made against so-called Christians was strawman. I have travelled the world interacting with Christians and Muslims. Typically the Muslims revert immediately to insults and profanity. Believers in Jesus would refrain from profanity. Just because the speaker does not grasp a concept does not make that concept illogical. Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John all knew Jesus and we have historical record about them as well. But the most important historical record is the divine revelation itself, which remains inerrant and preserved regardless of the lies ex-Christians tell. Nearly every argument he made against Christianity is made against Islam. The speaker asked supposed Christians who supposedly claimed they didn’t need the Bible, how they knew their revelations weren’t from Satan. The same can be asked of Mohammad, who gave the verses about Allah’s 3 daughters and later rejected them because Satan had interjected them pretending to be Jabril. How did Mohammad know that other revelations he recited from Jabril were not also interjected by Satan. If the Quran is God’s Word and God’s Word cannot be corrupted, why did Uthman have to collect and destroy all the variant readings? Why did many of the variant readings of the Quran survive this attempt and can be found on display in a museum in Istanbul among other places. Again, I pray those spreading their propaganda meet up with some true believers.
@@answersfromscriptureonline
Stop drama and lying Christian , it won't help you , not today
I am truly sick of your lies
i was christian before watching this video, and now im christian
we will see what u say on the day of judgement), might be really hot the place youre headed.
@@maxsss03 pls don't disrespect 😊 I am also Muslim but I'm not gonna say 'since you're Christian you're going to hell on judgement day'😢 no my friend don't say this 😊
@@maxsss03 you have to agree this videos arguments are goofy. He keeps saying what god cant do. As if he has any right to put limits on almighty god
@@maxsss03 calm down hbb no need for that let them be we can give advice of Islam if they don’t want khalas let them be
That's because you are brainwashed 😂
It's not the eyes that are blind but the heart.😞
Exactly for all muslim , because all of your are blind and following a blind prophet name is muhammad that verse alone perfect for all muslim because all of you are blind from the heart. You prove my point thank you 😊
the moment he start explaining about trinity, is the moment i can tell he have it wrong about trinity 😅😅
pause the video, make comments and close the tab😂
What you expect from a Muslim?😂 Even they don't understand their Koran 😆 and their Mohammad was illiterate unlettered 😂🤣
This is literally the same thing I just did🤣. it's the literal opposite, I feel like he knows it as well but it doesn't fit his argument
Enlighten us please
@@ramymansour4179 to explain it in simple terms- you have your blood, your flesh, and your mind, are these 3 different things separate from you/ distinct from you? No , they are the parts that make you whole, in other words, you are ONE being made up of different parts and that is the same thing with the trinity. In Christianity we believe God is ONE supernatural being made up of 3 different parts/persons that make him whole
@@shazamoroh7923 still doesnt make sense lol
Anyone else watching purely to defend against these bad arguments?
☦️🙏🏻
Yess. I'm here
ok wait i have a question. i dont mean to hate just actual curosity. you guys believe in the holy trinity. so that god is, the father, the son and the holy spirit. yet the holy sprit is not the father or the son, the son is not the father or the holy spirit and the father is not the son or the holy sprit. and i saw someone explain this that god is all 3 of them and that he divided himself into 3 parts so:
1. why would he need to divide himself into 3 parts if hes capable of doing everything by himself?
2. how is it that if god divided himself into 3 parts that why are those 3 parts not the same?
@@nini-ux9we he isn’t divided, they are all entirely God.
@@nini-ux9weNo, god can't be divided... That's wrong.
I will try to explain Trinity in a simple way.God has three positions called Father,Son and Holy spirit.They are distinct but one God. Also note that if someone explained Trinity as an examples of water (H20 molecules) ,egg ,avocado blah blah they are wrong.
It's simple to understand actually
Infinity divided by infinity is still infinity
Also thanks for increasing my Faith in Our Lord Jesus Christ
hindu commenting on idek
Thanks, rajesh
Subhanallah,
So you want to wait until the moment Jesus descended to earth to break the crucifix? Jesus himself said to not worship him as God.
@@amerbasyer 15 Jesus is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. 17 And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist.
Colossians 1:15 - 17
I love that through this video there are so many Christians that are strengthening their faith instead of getting mad. It shows how strong of believers you are. Do not show hate to Muslims, for they do not know any better. Show love to them and have patience. Pray that they shall come to sense soon, into gods light.
I think it's more they can't answer the Trinity either. No one really can.
@LakylakJesus is fully man AND fully God. When we worship Jesus we worship God.
Is only one god Jesus is not God I never he was god
@@nunya54 i can literally answer it to you in several different ways in hopes that your lack of ability to think still allows you to understand lol
@@sk1.432 how do you feel that your prophet that you worship molested and raped a poor little girl? Or are all muslims pedophiles?
Ali Dawah: "God cannot be in His creation"
Also Ali Dawah: "How Allah enters His creation every third part of the night, only Allah knows"
Conclusion: God and Allah are not the same 😂
A creature can't be a creator, but how did Jesus create a bird from clay? Make it make sense
First of all, Jesus making a bird from clay is umbilical. And God took on the human from to make his dwelling among us; which was necessary to be the sacrifice for us to be cleansed from our sins. When God decided to take on his human form, he voluntarily restricted his knowledge to have a human nature, and yet fully God at the same time. (Humans don't have all wisdom, but God had to do this in order to serve us by dying for us, despite the fact we don't and never will be worthy of his grace) However, Jesus still revealed and displayed his divinity and knowledge on other occasions (John 2;25, 11;43-44)@@ebm4205 But, when Jesus resurrected, his wisdom was unlocked, and had full access to all of it. His earthy ministry restricted him because he chose to do so, and it was part of submission.
@@ebm4205I see you got that from the book of Thomas, there is a reason it's not included in the official Bible ( ask yourself why it wasn't included..... FYI, don't think it's that obvious. Do your research first before pointing out such )
I'll end here !!.....
May God bless you
He said a whole lot of NOTHING! 🔥🔥🔥🔥
On a serious note, how can he not establish the Trinity correctly? That is actually just embarressing.
thats all you're going to take into account? what about the factual, historical error of the pharaoh and/or the king. if you watch hijab wood debate maybe you'll learn something.
yup
@@abz.rehman
Jesus is a prophet of God and prophets cannot lie. He said He would crucified and would raise his body from the dead 3 days later. That means either Jesus lied or that He is who He said He is,
In Revelation 22, Jesus said:
12 “And behold, I am coming quickly, and My reward is with Me, to give to every one according to his work. 13 I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last.”
Is this another lie from Jesus?
mysticvagrant wrote:
" On a serious note, how can he not establish the Trinity correctly? That is actually just embarressing. "
He creates his own straw-man version of the Trinity and then attacks it.
@@rickdavis2235 so we've established that Jesus is a prophet sent from god yes?
Jesus meets no criteria of a god
👇
( Matthew 4 : 1 ) Jesus was tempted
( James 1:13 ) God cannot be tempted
( John 1:29 ) Jesus was seen
( 1 John 4:12 ) No man has ever seen God
( Numbers 23:19 , Hosea 11 : 9 ) God is not a man
( Acts 2:22 ) Jesus was and is a man , sent by God
( Hebrews 5 : 8-9 ) Jesus had to grow and learn
( Isaiah 40:28 ) God doesn't ever need to learn
( 1 Corinthians 15 : 3-4 ) Jesus died
( 1 Timothy 1:17 ) God cannot die
( Hebrews 5 : 7 ) Jesus needed salvation
( Luke 1:37 ) God doesn't need salvation
( John 4 : 6 ) Jesus grew weary
( Isaiah 40:28 ) God can't grow weary
( Mark 4:38 ) Jesus slept
( Psalm 121 : 2-4 ) God doesn't sleep
( John 5:19 ) Jesus wasn't all powerful
( Isaiah 45 : 5-7 ) God is all powerful
( Mark 13:32 ) Jesus wasn't all knowing
( Isaiah 46 : 9 ) God is all knowing
When you meet him in eternity, what will you say with all the head knowledge ?
This religion should've died when Ahmed Deedat tore it to pieces.
@@7heLoveofGod mate, just read the Quran for once
@@Tzimiskes3506 mate, where did you get that from?
Subhan Allah how absent minded are the Christians who follow the Bible
"Christianity did not destroy paganism; it adopted it."
this just rose my faith in Christ towards eternity!
They don't even understand the trinity
@@kidtech123 yes the silly Muslims😂 do not understand the Trinity. Even their false prophet Mohammad was illiterate unlettered 🤣islam stupidity 🤣😂
@@kidtech123 then can u tell me what's that? logically
@@choconada7525 he cant because its impossible. I heard a quote once i dont remember who said it „If you can explain the trinity to someone you didnt understand it“
No one understands the Trinity. This has been a problem since Tertullin said it.
I was once atheist, but after watching this video, I have become Christian and given my heart and soul to Jesus, he is mighty to save, and nobody goes to heaven except through him.
bro has always been a christian
Really proves your ignorance
@@Goat_Dips you owned him
ignorance goes brr
@@Shazz288 Well 3 sides but 1 triangle. Each with different angles. I hope that's a good example for you.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts, I am Christian and I still am Christian the more hate to Christianity shows the more people want to get rid of it. Which God said would happen.
Where did God say that?
@@nunya54 Its general knowledge that Satan wants to get rid of the truth and good in this world
@@Remixzed Yes but that doesn't prove Christianity true. Christianity goes against the first commandment which is what would please Satan.
This is not hate my brother..this is facts😂
@@nunya54 John 15:18
So strange that they will believe a religion that came 600 years after Christianity. They claim that the disciples never met Jesus. History records them dying for their beliefs.
As strange as Jesus coming so many years after Moses? The Bible wasn't complete as we know it until hundreds of years after the 600 years. So that's kind of strange too.
@@nunya54 That is a lie! All the prophets pointed towards the messiah. No one pointed towards Muhammad. Also, the bible was compiled by 90 AD. History records the first believers of Christ dying for their beliefs. Islam is wrong.
The Bible was written over 1500 years@@vze21gwa Which Bible are you speaking off exactly and which books as many of the manuscripts, like those of John that are used most often to try to prove Jesus is God came after the time of Islam
All prophets pointed towards a messiah? Not God or the son of God, right? The Jews had prophecies of two messiahs actually and those prophecies were not names but descriptions and some of those descriptions fit Jesus and some do not; some of them only fit Muhammad and no other prophet.
Sorry, but there is no evidence of the first believers in Christ following or believing in him as other than a prophet of God like prophesized in the Torah and the messiah. There is no evidence of any prophet or Jesus himself ever saying he was the son of God or God. On the contrary, what Islam says about Jesus is exactly as those who first believed in Jesus say about Jesus. Islam also has nothing in it proven false. You can believe as you like, of course, but beliefs aren't evidence and Islam has evidence.
Please check your facts on when the Bibles were written.
@@nunya54 Okay, here goes:
1) The oldest manuscript we have of the book of Job is 1500BC, 3500 years ago; written in Paleo Hebrew to be exact. The new testament was done by 90AD. We know this because it does not mention the destruction of the second temple. The early church fathers quoted the New Testament and the trinity.
2) The Messiah was always said to have Godly characteristics: Isaiah 9:6 refers to him as mighty God. Psalm 110, David says "My Lord said to my Lord sit at my right hand while I make your enemies into a footstool". Read Job 9:30-35. The Messiah was to have Godly characteristics. Muhammad was NOT a Jew, nor did he live near the area. God did not give Arabs any prophecies, nor did he make any covenants with them.
2B) The Jews had a problem interpreting some of the prophecies so there came about "The Two Messiah Theory" whereby they believed that there would be two Messiahs. Messiah Ben Joseph (the son of Joseph) who would be the suffering servant, and Messiah Ben David (the son of David), the conquering king. They couldn't understand that Jesus was going to come twice, once to die for our sins, the second to reign forever.
3) The first believers believed that Jesus was the son of God. So did the early Church Fathers. Polycarp for example was the Bishop of Smyrna and a disciple of John the Apostle. He believed as did Justin Martyr and Ignacius. Also, the disciples themselves did miracles. Yes, they did miracles. Peter rose Dorcas from the dead Acts 9. Paul rose Eutychus from the dead in Acts 20. The disciples were constantly telling people the miracles came as a result of Jesus Christ.
4) The Quran was written 600 years AFTER the Bible and it does have contradictions!. Surah 5:116 says that Mary is part of the trinity when that has NEVER been a core belief. Also, Surah 96 says man was created from a blood clot, while 25:54 says water. Which is it? Muhammad did no miracles at all. He could not be a prophet. Buddha, Confucius and Muhammad are all in their tombs. Jesus lives and is alive. All other faiths are works-based, except Christianity, which is grace based.
5) Jesus himself said that he was God. John 8:58 when he said "Before Abraham was 'I am'." The term "I am" is how God referred to himself. John 10:30 Jesus said "My father and I are one". The people understood what he was saying. God is a trinity, John 1. When Jesus came down from heaven he left his glory behind John 17: 1-5. He came in the form of man and took all the limitations of a man, even unto death. But, because he was sinless, death could not hold him.
@@vze21gwa I hope that you will try to learn on your own and verify information as some of those details are incorrect. Muhammad performed many miracles, just like and similar to the ones Jesus did. He also fits the criteria in the Bible to know when a person speaks from God and their are descriptions of him that do not fit anyone else. Moses, Noah, Abraham, they're all dead too and according to Christians, Jesus died as well. That does not disprove prophethood unless you're rejecting all the prophets in the Bible. Christianity is grace based but that's not what Jesus taught. That's what PAUL taught (and he was considered an apostate of the law, a heretic and a liar posing as rabbinically trained). Jesus taught salvation through repentance, obedience, faith and works AFTER God's grace and mercy just like Islam teaches and just like all the prophets before Jesus taught. Since these ideas Paul borrowed from the pagan religions where he made his religious base among, incarnation, redeemer, savior figures, begotten sons, trinities and triads, they were probably grace based faiths too as he was trying to make Christianity as easy as possible to accept and do to attract pagan converts. Drop the work and just accept Jesus though there is nowhere Jesus says that himself and James and Jude refuted Paul for teaching that.
It's literally two verses that mention the Trinity and Mary is not in them. The Trinity is not mentioned in verse 5:116: And [beware the Day] when Allah will say, "O Jesus, Son of Mary, did you say to the people, 'Take me and my mother as deities besides Allah?'" He will say, "Exalted are You! It was not for me to say that to which I have no right. If I had said it, You would have known it. You know what is within myself, and I do not know what is within Yourself. Indeed, it is You who is Knower of the unseen. See, no Trinity. Why is this mention? Because Mary WAS worshipped by Christians but not part of the Trinity. The Collyridians worshipped Mary. Catholics, who pray to Mary, worship Mary by the definition of worship in Islam.
The Quran was NOT written 600 years AFTER the Bible as many manuscripts of the Bible came hundreds of years AFTER Islam, like manuscripts of John with the highest Christology. What would the time period matter though as Jesus came how many years after Moses? So the Jews are justified in rejecting Jesus and the New Testament for that same reason?
Jesus himself cannot be proven to have said anything in the Bibel since John can't be proven to be real and he never met Jesus nor does he say where he heard Jesus say those things. Jesus also said to make his disciples one with God too. Bishop Faustus: “It is certain that the New Testament was not written by Christ himself, nor by his apostles, but a long while after them, by some unknown persons, who, lest they should not be credited when they wrote of affairs they were little acquainted with, affixed to their works the names of the apostles, or of such as were supposed to have been their companions, asserting that what they had written themselves, was written according to these persons to whom they ascribed it .” (Faust, lib. 2. Quoted by Rev. R. Taylor: Diegesis, p. 114.)
David. M. Carr, Union Theological Seminary, Colleen M. Conway, Seton Hall University: All four of the canonical gospels were originally anonymous. It was only in the second century CE, when the four gospels were published a a collection that the superscriptions were added to the gospels, attributing authorship to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John respectively. This is also the time that traditions begin to appear about the authors, claiming that they were either original apostles of Jesus or close acquaintances of other well-known apostles. in spite of these attributions, most scholars do not think any of these men were the original gospel writers.
Raymond E. Brown, PhD, Catholic Biblical scholar: The view that the evengilists were not themselves eyewitnesses of the public ministiry of Jesus would be held in about 95% of contemporary [biblical] scholarship. The designation that you find in your New Testament, such as "the Gospel According to Matthew" are the results of late-second-century scholarship attempting to identify the authors of words that had no identification. No evangelist indicated who he was.
If you are generous, honest and unbiased then you'll definitely find the truth if you look for it .
You are right, brother. Praise Jesus.
@@wolfgray-r9c Amen
@@wolfgray-r9c When you mix Alcohol & Religion, you'll get Christianity. 😵💫
If you add a few kids and a priest to that.. 🤷♂️
he's found the truth wym
@@higherup9862 when you mix up everything you earwithout knowing to separate things between true and sin/false, you get ignorance
Thank you for making this video now I will go to church even more than before and pray to even god more, thank you for strengthening my faith!
ensure not to pray 2 mary & joseph... it is pagan... and do not wear a cross or have a cross.. coz that is also pagan... no images or idols is permitted
@@BlackJ1234 shut up
@@BlackJ1234 ensure not to pray to muhamad and
@@xar2608 what r u on about dawg muslims dont pray to muhammed
@@xar2608no one prays to Mohammed 😭😭😭😭
I'm so grateful for this video
Thanks to Ali dawah I'm a stronger Christan 🙌🙌
Praise be to Jesus Christ!!!
no he just turned you into a full cope addict. keep believing in a jewish sky daddy who had probably turned into a fossil.
“Delusion”
@@ALS313 terrorist
@@ALS313 ayo no disrespect pls 😢
@@maryiakanwal8700 I don’t attack Christians, I attack the corrupters of Christianity
Moses: Hear O Israel, Lord, our God is one.
Jesus: Hear O Israel, Lord, our God is one.
Muhammad: Say: God is One.
Peace, be upon them all.
Exactly the thinking we need! Thank you! ❤❤
Muhammad was a false prophet.
Before watching this I was Christian, now I’m even more strengthened in my faith in Christianity. This man has absolutely done no research and isn’t making anysense. God help him
Prophet Jesus the servant of Allah and your prophet Muhammad the last prophet of Allah

Uhm how is he not making any sense. He just proved the religion false ... You might be suffering inside from conflict and denial.
I heard there was an intellectually convincing preacher here so I came. After this video, I went to research on the Trinity and the Hypostatic union, and it strengthened my faith in Christianity.
Alternate title: Muslim misunderstands Christianity for 7:53
common sense isnt really common now
@@iranickid kaha se? Kuchh sahih nahi bola usne
CHRISTIANITY and Judaism are the WORLD'S MOST DEVASTATING SCAMS/FORGERIES/DECEPTIONS/FALSEHOODS:
CHRISTIANITY
and Judaism are by far, not just the world's biggest scams but also the
WORLD'S
MOST
BARBARIC
SCAMS
that have existed for more than
TWO THOUSAND YEARS
that have been responsible in the
DEATHS
of over
THREE HUNDRED MILLION
PEOPLE
and
HUNDREDS
of
TRILLIONS
of dollars in destruction all over the world.
Read, a multi-award-winning and wirld's renowned expert on the New Testament,
PROFESSOR
Dr. Bart Erhman's
FORGERY
and
COUNTERFORGERY
OXFORD
University Press;
Joseph Wheless'
FORGERY
in
CHRISTIANITY
published by Alfred A Knopf.
By far the world's
MOST ATROCİOUS religion is CHRİSTİANİTY,
whose followers, implementing BİBLİCAL GENOCİDAL commandments, have killed over
😮😮😮
THREE HUNDRED MİLLİON
😮😮😮
Native Americans, Africans, İndians, Afghans, Middle Eastern, etc. since 1490,
followed by
ATHEİSM,
yes it is a religion based on ABSURDİTİES, in just 100 years have been responsible for the deaths of over
100 MİLLİON
of mostly Russians and Chinese. İf not because of a series of wars against the CHRİSTİANS,
ISLAM
would have been the
WORLD'S MOST PEACEFUL
and the
LEAST ATROCİOUS
religion.
The BİBLİCAL evidence that CHRİSTİANS are the world's most genocidal religion:
With CHRİSTİANS go straight to the JUGULAR:
😳😳😳😳😳
The
BABY-MASSACRING ETHNİC-CLEANSING GENOCİDAL
😳😳😳😳😳
verses of the
BIBLE
"Now therefore KILL every male among the LITTLE ONES, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.
But all the WOMEN CHILDREN, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for YOURSELVES
😮😮😮
(as SEX SLAVES)."
😮😮😮
(BIBLE: Numbers 31:17-18). (All emphases and parentheses added)
😮😮😮
Bible: CHILDREN dashed to PIECES, their wives RAVISHED
😮😮😮
"Their CHILDREN also shall be dashed to PIECES before their EYES;
their houses shall be spoiled,
and their WIVES RAVISHED." (Bible: Isaiah 13:16)
😮😮😮
Bible: DESTROY everything that BREATHES
😮😮😮
"Only in the cities of these peoples that the LORD your God is giving you as an INHERITANCE, you shall not leave alive anything that BREATHES. “But you SHALL UTTERLY DESTROY them ..... "
(Bible: Deuteronomy: 20:16-17)
😮😮😮
Bible: DESTROY everything that BREATHES
😮😮😮
"So Joshua smote all the country of the hills, and of the south, and of the vale, and of the springs, and all their kings: he left none remaining, but UTTERLY DESTROYED all that breathed, as the Lord GOD of Israel COMMANDED." (Bible: Joshua 10:40)
😮😮😮
Bible: Have NO PITY on the fruit of the WOMB
😮😮😮
" "Their bows also shall dash the young men to pieces; and they shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eye shall not spare children." (Bible: Isiah 13:18)
😮😮😮
Bible: SLAY INFANT and SUCKLING
😮😮😮
"Thus saith the LORD of hosts.............Now go and smite Amalek, and
UTTERLY DESTROY
all that they have, and spare them not;
but SLAY both man and woman, INFANT and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." (Bible: I Samuel 15:2-3)
😮😮😮
Bible: SLAY little CHILDREN
😮😮😮
"And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity: SLAY UTTERLY old and young, both maids, and LITTLE CHILDREN, and woman: ..... ." (Bible: Ezekiel 9:5-6)
😮😮😮
Bible: WOMEN PLUNDER for YOURSELVES
😮😮😮
"When the Lord delivers it into your hand, put to the sword all the males .... As for the WOMEN, the children, the livestock and everything else in the city, you may take these as PLUNDER for yourselves." (Bible: Deuteronomy 20:13-14)
😮😮😮
Bible: PREGNANT women RIPPED up
😮😮😮
"Then Menahem smote Tiphsah, and all that were therein, and the coasts thereof from Tirzah: because they opened not to him, therefore he smote it; and all the WOMEN therein that were with CHILD he RIPPED up." (Bible: 2 Kings 15:16)
😮😮😮
Bible: DASHETH thy LITTLE ones against the STONES
😮😮😮
"Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Bible: Psalms 137:9)
😮😮😮
Bible: SLAY utterly.... little CHILDREN, WOMEN
😮😮😮
"And the Lord said unto him, ..... And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity:
SLAY UTTERLY old and young, both maids, and little CHILDREN, and women: ....." (Bible: Ezekiel 9:4-6)
Bible: DESTROY every WOMAN, VIRGINS brought to CAMP
"And this is the thing that ye shall do, Ye shall UTTERLY DESTROY every male, and EVERY WOMAN that hath lain by man.
And they found among the inhabitants of Jabeshgilead four hundred young
VIRGINS,
that had known no man by lying with any male: and they brought them unto the CAMP to Shiloh, which is in the land of Canaan." (Bible: Judges 21:11-12)
and MANY more in the BIBLE.
With CHRISTIANS, go straight to the JUGULAR:
AMERICAN HOLOCAUST
Just one of the NUMEROUS
MONSTROUS
results of believing in CHRISTIANITY and the BIBLE as the FİNAL AUTHORITY upon every Christian and Jew:
ATROCITIES of ASTRONOMICAL Magnitude perpetrated by
CHRISTIANS:
AMERICAN HOLOCAUST:
The bodies of
😳😳😳😳😳
WOMEN and CHILDREN MUTILATED in the MOST HORRIBLE MANNER
😳😳😳😳😳
CHRISTIANS
have been responsible for the deaths of more than a
😳😳😳😳😳
HUNDRED MILLION
😳😳😳😳😳
Native Americans:
WOMEN and CHILDREN'S bodies MUTILATED in the MOST HORRIBLE MANNER
😳😳😳😳😳
PROF. D. Stannard: All the killers were
CHRISTIAN
😳😳😳😳😳
Extracts from:
"American Holocaust
Columbus and the Conquest of the New World",
Professor D. Stannard,
OXFORD
University Press
(All emphases added)
" All the killers were Christian. . . .
The Nazi system was the consequence of a movement of ideas and followed a strict logic; it did not arise in a void but had its roots deep in a tradition that prophesied it, prepared for it, and brought it to maturity. That tradition was inseparable from the past of Christian, civilized Europe.14 " (Pg. 153)
" I saw quite a number of infants in arms killed with their mothers.
I should judge there were between 400 and 500 Indians killed ....
Nearly all, men, women, and CHILDREN were scalped.
I saw one WOMAN whose PRIVATES had been MUTILATED. The bodies were horribly cut up [testified Lucien Palmer, a Sergeant with the First Cavalry's Company C]
SKULLS BROKEN
in a good many; I judge they were broken in after they were killed, as they were shot besides. I do not think I saw any but what was scalped; saw fingers cut off [to get the rings off them], saw several bodies with privates cut off, women as well as men.
I saw a LITTLE BOY covered up among the Indians in a trench, still ALIVE. I saw a MAJOR in the 3rd regiment take out his pistol and BLOW OFF the top of his head.
I saw some men unjointing fingers to get rings off, and cutting off ears to get silver ornaments." (Page 132)
😳😳😳😳😳
"The DEAD BODIES of women and CHILDREN were afterwards MUTILATED in the MOST HORRIBLE MANNER
😳😳😳😳😳
[testified David Louderback, a First Cavalry Private] . I saw only eight. I could not stand it; they were cut up too much .....
All manner of
DEPREDATIONS
were inflicted on their persons [said John S. Smith, an interpreter], they were scalped, their BRAINS knocked out; the men used their knives,
😳😳😳😳😳
RIPPED OPEN WOMEN,
😳😳😳😳😳
CLUBBED their LITTLE children,
knocked them in the head with their guns, beat their brains out, mutilated their bodies in every sense of the word . . . worse mutilated than any I ever saw before,
the WOMEN all cut to PIECES
.... [C]hildren two or three months old; all ages lying there, from sucking infants up to warriors. " (Page 133)
As for those who persist in disbelief, it is the same whether you warn them or not-they will never believe. [2:6]
Aren’t pharaohs just the word for king or emperor in ancient Egypt when it comes to translation saying pharaoh or king is basically the same thing.
And don't ignore the 100+ contradiction in bible
the word itself is the problem. Not the meaning. the word was never use(or maybe exist) during Joseph era.
no, pharaohs were not kings for them, the ancient egyptions thought they were god in human form. that is why there body was preserved so that even in the hereafter they could remain human and with all there valuables.
@@neo7538 the same for the word "kings"
no, not at all
Alhamdulillah ♥️✨ for Islam , Jesus pbuh is a prophet of Allah
Then why would a prophet make himself equal with God?
In John 10:30 Jesus said: "I and My Father are one"
@@wolfsondjukic4164 In John, John said. John did not know Jesus. Who did he hear this from that Jesus said it?
@@nunya54That's Phillip who ask that where Jesus reply Have you still not know me Philip? 🙂
@@wolfsondjukic4164 John 14:28 the father is greater than I
@@wolfsondjukic4164 idk why u believe ur 40 authors
After watching this my faith in Christianity has grown much much more, Jesus Is King❤️🙏🏽
yet you can’t explain how
@@khalidomar984 what do u want to knwo? Jesus is the way truth and the life.....
@@christiscoming7590 damn near every christian don’t even respect their own religion and it’s rules it’s sad
🔴 *The Apostle Paul's Terrible Error* 🔴
📍In the Old Testament:
=>the Holy Place contains: Table of Showbread (Showbread on it) + Candlestick + Altar of Incense.
=>the Holy of Holies contains: Ark of the Covenant
" Hebrews 9:2-4 " *“²For there was a tabernacle made; the first, wherein was the candlestick, and the table, and the shewbread; which is called the sanctuary. ³ And after the second veil, the tabernacle which is called the Holiest of all; ⁴ Which had the golden censer, and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold, wherein was the golden pot that had manna, and Aaron’s rod that budded, and the tables of the covenant”.*
There are three errors :
- Firstly, Paul mentioned the Table *AND* the Showbread, knowing that the latter is *ON* the Table. (Exodus 25:30 “And thou shalt set *upon* the table shewbread before me alway.”)
- The second error is that Paul mentioned the golden censer in the Holy of Holies. Moreover, If we suppose that the golden censer is an element in the Holy of Holies, why was it not mentioned in the Torah or in the Jewish heritage? It is not logical that it's not mentioned in the Torah and then Paul mentioned it after that. The fourth verse mentioned the golden censer then the Ark of the Covenant which contained the Golden Pot, Aaron’s Rod, and the Tablets of the Stone; if the golden censer was of Aaron’s legacy, then Paul should have mentioned it among the contents of the Ark of the Covenant, not in the Holy of Holies.
- The third error is that Paul did not mention the Altar of Incense at all.
- *Father Matta El Meskeen. The Epistle to the Hebrews: Explanation and Study, pp. 519-520:* the Altar of Incense: the Apostle Paul did not mention it here, and the reasons and interpretations differed.... and in Hebrews 9:4, he mentioned a golden censer, baffling the commentators, because it is known that the Altar of Incense is in the Sanctuary.
- *John Gill's Exposition:* but here a difficulty arises, how this can be said to have been in the holy of holies, and within the vail, when, according to Moses, it was without the vail, and was only carried within on the day of atonement; and so Philo the Jew (a) places it in the other part of the tabernacle; and it seems as if it was to avoid this difficulty, that the Ethiopic version has removed it from this verse to verse the second, and put it among the things that were in the holy place.
- *Franz Delitzsch. Commentary On The Epistle To Hebrews, pp. 54-55:* Such being the Hellenistic usage, and in particular that that of Josephus and Philo, whose phraseology has so many points of resemblance to that of other author, it seems impossible to escape the conclusion that θυμιατηριον means here the incense-altar, and nothing else. It would be, moreover, a quite inexplicable omission in this connection, had he said nothing about it. But if θυμιατηριον here I the altar of incense, the sacred writer appears to be involved in the grosse error of supposing that this golden altar, of which Philo says correctly that it stood between the golden candlestick and the holy table… and Bleek draws thence the conclusion that he could not have been a Jew of Palestine: but even supposing him to have been an Alexandrine Jew, he must have been a monster of ignorance and forgetfulness to be capable of such a mistake.
- *Ellicot’s Commentary for English Readers:* The incense-altar and the ark are coupled together, and the word which describes their relation to the Holiest Place is that which, a little later in this verse, distinctly signifies "containing." So weighty is this consideration that many have been unable to avoid the conclusion that the writer has erred in this matter of detail; and various suppositions have been resorted to in explanation of his mistake.
- *Expositor's Greek Testament:* ... and the versions of Symmachus and Theodotion in Exodus 31 use θυμιατήριον for “altar of incense”. Besides, the form of the word indicates that it could be used of anything on which incense is offered. It was, therefore, understood of the “altar” by Clement Alex. and other fathers; by Calvin, who says, “quo nomine altare suffitus vel thymiamatis potius intelligo quam thuribulum;” and by most modern scholars. As has frequently been urged it is incredible that in describing the furniture of the tabernacle there should be no mention of the altar of incense. Difficulty has been felt regarding the position here assigned to it, for in fact it stood outside the veil; and the author has been charged with error.
✴️One of the commentators say that Paul mentioned the golden censer in the Holy of Holies for fear of theft and to be in a safe place, and this is very funny because the commentator forgot that the Candlestick and the Table are plated with gold. Therefore, the commentary is ridiculous, because even if the golden censer was moved to the Holy of Holies for fear of theft, the Candlestick and the Table are plated with gold too (Exodus 25).
🔴 The question remains, why did Paul not mention the Altar of Incense? There are two solutions, the sweetest of which is bitter; either Paul did not write by inspiration or he is an ignorant liar.
*Who explains to us why the Koran says Christians believe God has a biological son!*
To all Muslims! Son of God means NOT SON! What is called the son of God is the word of God = god himself! Which has nothing to do with a child (son)! Thus, the Son of God is incarnated as the human Jesus and the human Jesus is therefore referred to as a son, which does not mean a son!
Where do I start? Theres so much to unpack... Still a christian ❤
Start with learning about Paul. The true founder of Christianity.
@@nunya54 oh yh start with a rapist the creator of islam
"it is the hearts that are blind, not the eyes."
Nope.. his brain is also blind
if I asked a Muslim to explain that. They will run away because you know that referred to themselves blind fath😂🤣 without lies Islam dies 🥴
@@blessing21Wdym explain it??? The verse is literally so clear. This is why ur a Christian bc u can’t understand simple verses lol. 😂
@@Idkkk555 you didn't understand what I said 🤣. Remember your Mohammad was uneducated 😂🤣 just like you Muslims no knowledge 🤣🤣
I swear Islam for brainless muslims have no intelligent 😂😂😂.No thanks to pagaism allah 🤣🤣🤣🤣. An educated muslims is an ex muslims.
Thank you heavenly Father for sending Jesus to show the example of how to serve you. Thank you that NO one can refute that Christ was without sin. No man has ever been without sin no even muhammad . Thank you God that you are not limited and that you actually communicate with those who accept that Jesus died for the atonement of sin. Every other belief can't rejoice in knowing their prayers get answered, they don't heal the sick and without accepting Christ they have no assurance of being free from sin.
Jesus peace be upon him prayed to God with his head on the ground... If he is the example of how to serve God according to Christianity, why aren't you? In the bible it says that you shouldn't have pork or drink alcohol, why are the Christians still eating and drinking that what is forbidden? In the bible it says that woman should cover their hair, why aren't they? The muslims are more Christian than the Christians themselfs.. Jesus (PBUH) was a muslim.. Nowhere in the bible Jesus says ''I am God'' or '''Worship me"' and if the bible wasn't corrupted we muslims would read everyday from it just like the Quran (the LAST and COMPLETED testament)
@@Ines-kw5sx because you're taking out of context,that's the old testament, When Jesus died, the curtain of the temple was torn, which means, we don't have to go to Jerusalem to pray every time, we don't have to cover our hair anymore, there are two commandments,
Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul and with all thy mind, and thy neighbor as thyself, which technically amounts to the 10 commandments and more. so Jesus sacrified so that we can have acces to God, being forgiven of our sin trough Him
I argue that this is not the best action when a significant portion of people seeing this site see you from a different perspective
@@deborahle9723I ask you what wrong with the old Testament ? Isn't is that the word of God too? If you deny that you deny God, and Isa/Yesus.
@@HandsomeT-z4l There is absolutely nothing wrong with the old testaments, where did i say that, maybe you got it wrong, the new testament complete the first one and both are the Word of God
Hi just here to say that I'm a PROUD Christian and I love Jesus Christ forever. I'm going through the worst days of my life rn, but I would never denounce Jesus and Christianity not even for a second.
Worship God like Jesus did. Your life will get better. May God guide you.
Before when i was not muslim ,i also felt as you ...sad , depressed, anoxios/scared ,lazy ,empty ,suicidal thoughts, no happiness.
But when i turn to Allah(God) my life changed opposite ,Jesus also turned to God and used to pray and cry to Him even Bible says it,you should follow teachings of Jesus who was also a muslim .you should educate yourself about Islam , because why not learn about worlds number 1 religion with the most population ,you still have a chance ❤
Btw at least Islam makes sense and has answers for everything you need in you life .
You will learn who are you ,why God created you ,what is your purpose ,etc... Don't waste and play with your time ,education will not hurt you it can only help you❤
youre going through the worst days , its a sign lmao, turn to god only and stop worshiping the messenger (Jesus) who came so that you can worship god not him
@@whozhio7878 Quran is a twisted copy of Bible dude. The sole purpose of Quran is to damage the word of true God. Don't worry, my problems are nothing compared to what many others are going through in this world. Thanks for your care. Going with what you said, except a few Arab countries, Muslim countries are the worst to live in the world. Why is that so? Lmao. Also, u seems to be true Muslim like others as you literally said Lmao when somebody said he's in pain. Hope you have beautiful hoori waits for you in paradise. 🤣
He is the Truth the Way and the Life, your struggles can't compare to the joy that is coming Much love✝️❤️
Thank you my friend. I was a muslim now I converted to Christianity and you made my faith stronger in Christianity!
Bros mad
Okay buddy, thanks for sharing (:
Hahahahaha
You're lying so much kid
But in islam we don't lie it's forbidden 😊
Tell me if you really were a Muslim what are the conditions in islam to be a Muslim
@@Mohammad-793 Don't waste your time with him.
In the end each of us have a grave of our own, let him see what he will find in the end being a polytheist.
not related to this topic but i have noticed how people who believe in islam are very discipline but some people who claim they are Christians do the most non Christian like behavior and if you insult islam in any way or form in an islamic country there would be serious consequences but us Christians have become too tolerant and if someone wears a shirt "jesus was gay" you would be fine.
Greetings and Blessings, Well Christianity is not a forced religion and so true Christians are not going to punish oppositional behavior because Vengeance is the Lord's. He will repay. Besides, the Bible is clear that unbelievers have a spirit of disobedience working within them... There are only children of God and children of the Devil. So, the rebellion and hatred are inevitable and too be expected as Jesus warned his disciples about it. Also, there is no such thing as a Christian nation because the Christian mandate is to make disciples of all nations teaching them to obey what Christ commanded. Love God and Love their neighbor as themselves. I don't expect rebellious people to accept God's ways and standards... they haven't encountered Him and been spiritually transformed by Him... so someone wearing a t-shirt such as you mentioned would just be in alignment with the God haters that the Bible talks about from Romans 1. Punishment, Fear, and Force to get someone to adhere to one's religion is not anything a Christian would condone. -Blessings from Tajji in Tanzania
i think you shouldn't tell this to make christians look better (or to be proud of it for being "too" tolerant, maybe). those christians joking like that probably feeling dorky and more special just because they can disrespect their god only for the sake of being funny. it's really weird. and this what makes christians and muslims different. just because you can, doesn't mean you should. you know homosexuality is forbidden in bible too right? and now maybe you and those christians should start seeing the christian jesus as "god" and stop looking at petty jokes as a funny thing. maybe this is why bibles get edited so many times into so many verses because some christians just can't handle the "strict" rules of their religion so they make it easier for their satisfactions.
@@1.7jt I didn't say this to make other Christians proud of being very tolerant though and I think the Bible gets edited to help some readers understand it better because if I read the original Bible it would be quite a difficult task to do so.
Cause our religion teaches us to love the people we hate . Not like Islam
Doesnt that tell you what a violent religion islam is?
1 - Whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi (Glory be to Allah and Praise Him) a hundred times during the day, his sins are wiped away, even if they are like the foam of the sea [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:168]
2 - whoever says SubhanAllahi wa biHamdihi, Subhan-Allahi 'l-`adheem (Glory be to Allah, and Praise, Glory be to Allah, the Supreme)
Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) said: "Two words are light on the tongue, weigh heavily in the balance, they are loved by the Most Merciful One " [Sahih al-Bukhari; #7:67]
3. La Hawla wa la Quwatta illa Billah (There is no Might or Power except with Allah)
[the above is] a treasure from the treasures of Paradise.[Sahih al-Bukhari; al-Fath al-Bari #11:213]
0
1. So if you go kill someone for no reason, then you can say it 100 times that day and your sin will be wiped away...Moreover,you can kill multiple times and just say the phrase 100 times each and get away with it in heaven. Hahhahahaha nice trick xD
@@24archfiend I dont think you understand. It wont work if you dont say it from heart. You have to try your best to not do those sins again and then say that 100 times during the day to get your sins wiped. You cant just kill people and then say it and then kill more people the next day
@@notrock6151 true
@@notrock6151 So were your prophet's pedophilic attacks on 9-year-old Aisha forgiven or did he not ask for forgiveness?
That's nice dear do you want sugar with that?
Uhh I don’t see how he debunked Christianity he just used an insane amount of rhetoric. 😐
He legit proved that the trinity the main center of Christianity is wrong wdym
Un no he didn’t just because you don’t understand the trinity doesn’t mean Christianity is not true, why didn’t he say anything about the historical facts? And that’s another thing even though you don’t know which John wrote the book of John that doesn’t mean none of them met Jesus, but it’s pretty obvious it was the apostle because he wrote pretty much everything about Jesus so that means he was with him all the time. The reason I believe Muhammad is that Jesus had already talked about false prophets in the beginning and BAM. 6 Centuries later Muhammad comes up with Quran. Bruh give me break if you want to say Muhammad is right then he at least had to be around Jesus. But he wasn’t and this is 600 years later. Just to sum it up, without the Bible you have no Quran. If your God was so true then he wouldn’t had made mistakes, and correcting everything in the Koran, you cant say that about In the New Testament either because Jesus was already prophesies from the beginning
@@justabenzndat5575 No he never. No Christian believes in "3 God's," not Christian believes that the persons aren't "self sufficient," and "don't have 1 will," You think he debunked our faith when He never even actually spoke about what we truly believe in the video.
I was having a hard time as a christian. After watching your video, my faith in Jesus stared growing again & I felt better than ever before. Keep up the good work Ali Dawah, you're making our Christian Community (umma in devil term) only stronger
Without lies Islam……😂
You are joking right?😂
@@majedamkieh Ali is a goofy liar
@@Yeshuaisthetruth33 nope he was saying facts and you can search for it
@@Yeshuaisthetruth33where did he lie?
Damn, I didn't know Ali was a pathological liar, guess he can just add it to his resume of other great qualities
cuz what u on bout?
@@arma8762 the lies
@@isftv7883 Oh really? Why can't your "scholars" prove him wrong? If he's lying, catch him, expose him. But instead, they get exposed.
@@badshahSelamet can I ask whether or not you have actually looked yourself for any information or whether you've just blindly believed what you've been told. I could happily sit here and tell you all the relevant proof that would disprove all his idealogies and more but you wouldn't believe me. Instead try researching for yourself using non bias sources and not looking for the answer you want
@@badshahSelamet he won't debate scholars as his knowledge is very limited and he's already been exposed for what he is. If this is the best Islam has got to offer then no wonder you have a tsunami of apostasy happening .
Damn I feel more confident to be Christian praise the lord
lets see you try to praise Isa a.s (jesus) in Yawm Al Qiyama, only a few signs left, most of the signs mentioned by the prophet has come true. Hold onto your cross and see where it leads you, or accept Allah and submit your life to him and seek forgiveness.
@@BeratMost no he is not my god or my saviour Jesus is so I know your religion very very well and it’s just a no for me.
may allah guide you
Blind faith detected here
@@tabaarietti9980 ah u meant him i thought u answering to me my bad
Thank you for this video. This is why more muslim friends are accepting Christianity.
destruction xD...
no "Muslim friend" is accepting christianity it's quite the opposite LOL
Islam is the fastest growing religion even in christian majority countries like the US and continents like Europe
@@1faaiz110 YES.. IT IS PROPHECIED IN THE BIBLE
in the last days... false religion will cover the whole world to the extent that true religion becomes so rare
You wish. No Muslims are accepted Christianity. We will not believe in a god that came out of a woman private part pussy. We are too intelligent. You so stupid you say 1+1+1= 1.
Sorry that your god is crying to "ALLAH ALLAH WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME " Mathew 27 : 46
You sure ? I see a lot of empty church and a lot of full mosque around me 😏 You should do some research about the fastest growing religion in the world.
I see so many Christians in denial mode and saying "I was Christian before this video and I am still Christian" and some even say "My faith in Christianity is increased".
Look what ALLAH (S.W.T) tells about these kinds of ignorant and close minded people.
" Those who deny the truth are like animals which hear nothing in your call but the sound of a voice, without understanding its meaning. They are deaf, dumb and blind. They understand nothing".
[Surah Baqarah:171]
"It is not the eyes that are blind, but their hearts which are in their breasts" (heart).
[Surah Hajj:46]
"As for those who are bent on denying the truth, it makes no difference to them whether you warn them or not, they will not believe".
[Surah Baqarah :6]
"God has sealed their hearts and their ears, and over their eyes there is a covering. They will have a terrible punishment."
[Surah Baqarah:7]
there are many more verses about it.
ALLAH (S.W.T) KNOWS BEST.
MAY ALLAH (S.W.T) GUIDE US ALL AND KEEP US (MUSLIM'S) FIRM ON OUR RELIGION (ISLAM). AMEEN YA RABBULAYLAMEEN.
Ameen😔
I actually though this video was going to challenge some of my thoughts but they haven't changed them at all. He literally got the breakdown of the Holy Trinity completely wrong😭 But we shouldn't condemn him but pray for him so that the Lord may open his eyes.
What did he get wrong about the Trinity?
@@islam12539no response 😂
so if someone is curious about it and let’s say he might wna join Christianity and wants to know more, you just say “no response”???
@@islam12539 He said that one day we pray to God, then to Jesus, then to the Holy Spirit, when they're all one. And sorry for the late response I never saw your comment. Everyone else in the comments are saying the exact same thing btw
@@balsack5102 Didn't see their comment
'Whoever is silent, he is saved.' - The Prophet.
Pig be upon him
whats ur discord @ and tag pls reply plspllspl34ojnwf4wc
Judism - we don't accept Jesus as messiah
Islam - we accept Jesus as a prophet not God because the new testament is corrupted
Meanwhile
Christianity - For whoever exalts will be humbled and whoever humbles will be exalted.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God loved the world so much that he gave his only Son, so that everyone who believes in him may not die but have eternal life.
why would god have a son? just asking
To understand what LOVE, FORGIVENESS AND SACRIFICE. Really are..
To give us gospel to have a eternal life
Because GOD is the images of us...
@@vilmarjohns.irigan60 cap
@@vilmarjohns.irigan60 when you can't argue about something
@@RbccaFaith genesis 1:26 And God said Let us make man in our image, after our likeness..
In the word LET US what you think GOD talking with..?..
He left Islam and publically accepted Jesus.. Hallelujah!
I love how most of the comments mostly (christian people) are just copying and pasting the same comment with no valid proof or evidence that his argument is false or wrong
Thanks ali dawah for strengthing my faith in my religion
okay first off the whole "god cant eat god cant sleep" argument, its crazy saying what god can or cant do. ali dawah doesnt decide what god can do or not. second he literally supports p*edophillia. I wish that was slander however i have seen clips not even out of context. god gave us a law. the law was ineffective so god came to earth in human form to die for our sins. in islam the law wasnt effective so they changed a couple of the laws, no human can follow the law fully as we all sin. muhammed randomly changing the law serves no purpose. plus its the testimony of jews romans and christians, (who said jesus claimed to be god) vs arab warlord who married a 6 year old
How do we know that this guy is wrong?
1. His explanation of the Trinity is wrong. The trinity works similar to the Sun, there's the Sun in the sky, the sunrays that come down to your room and the solar panel which powers your house. The Sun is God, the rays that come down are Jesus and the solar panel is the Holy Spirit. The sun is in the sky, but it's also in your room and your house is being powered by the Sun. The rays come from the Sun, and the power comes from the rays. If you had read the Bible honestly you would have seen the order is that Jesus comes from the Father. The Sun is not dependent on the rays. The rays come down to us because if the Sun did, we'd die.
2. I've never heard this claim before but I'd like to point out the Bible also says woe to the one who changes the word of God. "These are added in"? Really? Modern day Quran's which have been translated to English also have things added in because more words are needed to convey one word from Arabic. The changes aren't that drastic unless you're talking about some crazy translation made to purposely mess with the Word of God.
Ah, the classic king, Pharoah, argument, the Bible wasn't written in English, it was written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. The word Pharoah, is from the Egyptian word 'Pe-ra' which means great house. As with all words, this term evolved over time to eventually become the term used for the king of Israel. But I would also like to point out that the Joseph story wasn't written as the story was happening, it was written at a later date, when the term Pharoah had likely become known.
Did the Bible copy from the Quran? Well comparing the two, I'd say the Quran copied from the Bible, seeing as the Torah had been around for a good while. The Quran is basically like the Bible but with many many additions that form a foundation for the faith (e.g. Abraham and Ishmael building the Kaaba), if the Bible had copied from the Quran, there would have been more information in the Bible than the Quran. You get my drift, the changes are so random and normally have to do with the beliefs that would later be expounded on.
3. Refer to point 1. But logically speaking, let's look at Isa (Jesus in the Quran), why is he the only prophet who was raised to Allah? Even the prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) died. This is what sets Jesus apart from all other traditions, the fact that He was raised to the father. The Quran talks about the Injeel (Gospel) and calls it a divine scripture [even though it's not the Quran] which Isa was given to guide His followers. So from a logical point why don't all Muslims read the Gospel seeing as this prophet who was born of a woman who never knew a man, did many miracles and was raised to Allah had teachings? Because there they'd find He is the messiah and came to take away their sins but that would counter their foundational beliefs.
If prophets spoke the word of God, in that case why could they be beaten, killed, etc? The Bible says God moved on holy men to write the scriptures, like a prophet has a voice and appearance which differs from another, the same happens with writings. The word of God has been translated into differet languages and still changes the lives of those who read it. Words must be changed because words change meaning over time. Calling someone gay once meant they were happy, so an old book changing the word gay to happy does not make it corrupted.
The sixty six books are confirmed in the scripture, in that in the old testament, the golden lampstand which represents the word of God has sixty six knobs on it. The original eighty two books contained writings that were historical accounts or ficticous stories or unecessary additions without verifiable proof of their sources. It's like how Sunni muslims don't use Hadith al-Thaqalayn.
Your poison analogy is fallacious, if things from something holy are taken out, it makes it less holy not poison.
Why would the disciples write autobiagraphies when they were following the son of God? Makes no sense.
4. Wow there are three John's?! Really disproves Christianity! Islam doesn't have this name confusion simply because the Quran doesn't mention a lot of names aside from the person the book is about and the patriachs.
I have never heard of the new Jerome commentary, therefore it's dishonest to make it sound like every Christian knows what you're talking about.
This could be said about the Musilim faith too: "I'm getting information from the hereafter by people I don't know, from a book that they wrote inspired by God that's full of what I think to be mistakes and they are telling me about a God that makes no sense." This is basically what religion is, that's where faith comes in.
Believing your arguments are true is Janazah.
5. Christians who reject the Bible are not a good example of Christians. It would be as unfair if I said Muslims have now started bombing places.
Jesus doesn't need to match in people's visions. When Jesus appeared to his disciples he transformed himself so they couldn't recognize him. People can see Jesus in different ways. Muslims in Iraq have shared testimonies of seeing Jesus and converting to Christianity. They know it's Jesus by what he tells them to do, Satan wouldn't tell you he'd take away your sins and help you live a righteous and holy life. P.s. this would also happen f you'd asked people who claimed they saw Muhammad (peace be upon him) what he looked like.
6. True because of two things.
No. 1. Most Christians today aren't really Christians, they were just born into a Christian family.
No. 2. Because the foundation of Christianity is faith not logic and faith doesn't have to make sense. The Bible says faith comes by hearing and hearing the word of God and without faith it is impossible to please God. So friend faith isn't the best for winning arguments and winning arguments is not the goal of Christianity.
Feel free to contact me for more questions, arguments or whatever at e.i.joel1316[at]G-mail[dotcom].
God bless
I wish I was there and could have told him about his misconceptions about my God ( With the Grace of God ) . Hopefully one day I'll talk to him face 2 face
INTELLIGENT people are the most CONFUSED people
AND
IDIOTS are the most CONFIDENT of all .
I CAN SEE THAT !
And who are you????
If he is confused you will say he hasn't done his research lollll. You are the most contradictory person ever
@@Fazemuj4132 here is your contradiction 👇👇👇
PROPHET SAID : BITE FATHER'S DCIK ( VULGARITY AT PEAK )
HADITH : AL-MUFRAD 963
GRADE : SAHIH
best role model of humanity ???
NOW GO AND CRY IN ONE CORNER 🤗🤗🤗
@@Fazemuj4132 what happened ?? everything looking contradictory now ?? 😂😂😂👇👇👇
AL-MUFRAD 963
As a Christian I can confirm that no true Christian rejects the Bible
Damn watching this I thought I would doubt my faith. Hallelujah Im still Christian nothing changed.
It didn't even make me doubt a bit none of his answers were sensible
@@Couragethecowardlydog509 Qur’an 55:56 (also describing the condition of paradise):
In them are women limiting [their] glances, untouched before them by man or jinni (Sahih International)
Abu Umama narrated: "The Messenger of God said, 'Everyone that God admits into paradise will be married to 72 wives; two of them are houris and seventy of his inheritance of the [female] dwellers of hell. All of them will have libidinous sex organs and he will have an ever-erect penis.' " (Sunan Ibn Majah, Book 39)
Ali dawahs religion promotes sex brotherel in heaven and ali dawah gets debunked at speakers corner😘🤣
@@PapalEnjoyer 😂 “Libidinous organs” and an “ever erect penis” i am dead 🤣
@@Couragethecowardlydog509 yep thats islam🤣
@@PapalEnjoyer we are against adultery bro
I was born into Islam and have found the love and mercy of the triune God. Hallelujah
I like how since Christians are finding the truth of Islam you are lying that you converted from Islam to Christianity to make yourselves feel better 😂
Jesus the way the truth and the life.
@@johnmurphy588 ‘he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father’ (Matthew 26:39)
‘During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.’ (Hebrews 5:7)
your Jesus prayed to a god like a muslim
@@freezedupfrost6064 Why you acting like muslims created the whole concept of prostrating and falling to face whilst praying? Pagans prayed to their gods while prostrating long before islam. The Israelites would prostrate in prayer to Yahweh long before islam came. Read Ezra 10:1 "Now while Ezra was praying and making confession, weeping and PROSTRATING himself before the house of God, a very large assembly, men, women, and children, gathered to him from Israel; for the people wept greatly."
you try to use the verse Matthew 26:39 as a proof that jesus is an islamic prophet yet muslims don't pray to God as Father, Jesus is the one here calling God my Father
Is Allah the Father of Jesus?
@@johnmurphy588 Jesus has no literal father, a god can't impregnate a woman.
Main point wasn't that Jesus is a Islamic prophet, main point is that he isn't god. If he was he wouldn't be praying to something else by letting out loud cries and falling on his face
Thanks for reminding me to Pray to Jesus before bed, as a Crhistian this video enlightened me and now I'm still a Crhistian
If Christian means a person who follow the teaching of jesus, then Muslim are more Christian than Christians themselves
@@RbccaFaith you follow what you think he said, we follow what we think he said, one is right one is wrong or they're both wrong, I don't want to start a discussion over wich faith its better only god will decide if there is even a god
You can stay Christian .. no one is trying to convert you.. all Muslims have the duty to convey the message not covert. Just be truthful to yourself and think about the soundness of trinity… because i m thinking.. without biases.. but not making any sense to me..
@@sadik6490 just let these human worshipers alone😂
It is very easy to refute Islam! Because the God of Islam does not know that according to Christianity God incarnated
True love = the love of God!
*God himself went to the cross for you out of love for you as a human being*
Philippians 2:5-8
Thank you for making this video i wad Christian before watching:now im still Christian
me when ali dawah tells me my religion is false because there is 3 johns 😰
Matthew 17:21
KJV: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting."
Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in א (original handwriting), B, θ, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Ethiopic manuscripts. It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient - C, D, K, L - as well as some other mss of the ancient versions. It is believed to have been assimilated from Mark.[12]
Matthew 18:11
KJV: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost."
Reason: This verse is lacking in א, B, L (original handwriting), θ, ƒ1, ƒ13, some old Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Georgian manuscripts, and such ancient sources as the Apostolic Canons, Eusebius, Jerome, and others. It is found in some other sources, not quite so ancient, such as D, K, W, X, and the Latin Vulgate. It is not found in any manuscript before the 5th century.[13] According to Bruce Metzger, "There can be little doubt that the words [...] are spurious here, being omitted by the earliest witnesses representing several textual types... [This verse was] manifestly borrowed by copyists from Luke 19:10."[14]
Matthew 23:14
KJV: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."
Reason: This verse is very similar to Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47. This verse is lacking altogether in א,B,D,L,Z,θ, ƒ1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic manuscripts, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. It appears before verse 13 in K,W, and several New Testament minuscules. It appears after verse 13 in ƒ13, some Italic and Syriac and Coptic manuscripts. The fact that it is absent from the most ancient sources of multiple text types and that the sources that do contain the verse disagree about its placement, as well as the fact that it is a repetition of verses found elsewhere, show "that verse 14 is an interpolation derived from the parallel in Mark 12:40 or Luke 20:47 is clear."[14]
Mark 7:16
KJV: "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear."
Reason: This verse is nearly identical with verses 4:9 and 4:23. This verse here is lacking in א,B,L,Δ (original handwriting), some Coptic mss. It is included in manuscripts only slightly less ancient, A,D,K,W,ƒ1,ƒ13, Italic manuscripts, the Vulgate, some other ancient versions. As it is missing in the very oldest resources and yet is identical to verses that remain, many editors seem confident in omitting its appearance here.[citation needed]
Mark 9:44 and 9:46
KJV: "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." (The verses are identical to each other, and to 9:48, which is still in the main text)
Reason: Both verses 44 and 46 are duplicates of verse 48, which remains in the text. Verses 44 and 46 are both lacking in א,B,C,L,W,ƒ1, and some manuscripts of the ancient versions, but appear in somewhat later sources such as A,D,K,θ, some Italic manuscripts and the Vulgate. It is possible that verse 48 was repeated by a copyist as an epistrophe, for an oratorical flourish.[15] The UBS text assigns this omission a confidence rating of A.
Mark 11:26
KJV: "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses."
Reason: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15. This verse appeared in the Complutensian Polyglot and most Textus Receptus editions but Erasmus omitted it and noted that it was missing from 'most' Greek manuscripts.[16] The verse is not in א,B,L,W,Δ,Ψ, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. The UBS edition gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A.
Mark 15:28
KJV: "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors.""
Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. It does not appear here in any New Testament manuscript prior to the end of the 6th century.[17]
Luke 17:36
KJV: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left."
Reason: It is possible that this verse is a repetition of Matthew 24:40. Even the King James Version had doubts about this verse, as it provided (in the original 1611 edition and still in many high-quality editions) a sidenote that said, "This 36th verse is wanting in most of the Greek copies." This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (1516-1535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st-3rd editions (1546-1550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), the margins of Stephanus' 4th edition (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's editions (1565-1604).[18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20]
John 5:3-4
Main article: John 5 § Interpolation (verses 3b-4)
KJV: "3[...] waiting for the moving of the water. 4For an Angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had." (Not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.)
Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek manuscripts that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [meaning occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the manuscripts that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording.[21] The UBS text gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. This verse was omitted from Edward Harwood's Greek NT (1776), marked as doubtful in Griesbach's editions (1777), and thereafter generally relegated to a footnote, enclosed in brackets, or omitted completely.
Henry Alford wrote, "The spuriousness of this controverted passage can hardly be questioned."[22] Without the words at issue the context simply states that a swimming or bathing pool in or near Jerusalem was a gathering place for sick and crippled people, some of whom sought to get into the pool (either for physical comfort or for ritual cleansing) and it was there that Jesus performed miraculous healing. However, the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. This passage in John 5 is the only mention of this pool - no such miraculous pool is mentioned in Josephus or other histories.[23] The words in question do not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and in those manuscripts that contain them they are sometimes marked as doubtful, and differ from manuscript to manuscript "with that extreme variation in the reading which so often indicates grounds for suspicion".[24]
The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, א, A (original hand), B, C (original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Verse 4 ("For an angel ...") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ("waiting for the stirring of the water ...") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (14th century), and an Egyptian manuscript. The concluding words of verse 3 but not any of verse 4 appear in D, 33 (9th century), and some Latin manuscripts. The entire italicized passage appears in C (third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), Δ,Θ,Ψ, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts - S,Λ,Π, and a few others - contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. Among the manuscripts that contain this sentence-and-a-half, there are many variations and permutations.[25]
The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: "... a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. 5And a certain man was there ...", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. Several modern versions similarly relegate those words to a footnote, and some others (such as Moffatt) include the words in the main text but are enclosed in brackets with an explanation in a footnote.
“Because we don’t copy” that seems like taking credit for writing the book
well lemme explain to you "so called hypocrites" that it makes no sense because we know there are several errors in the Bible and the Qur'an is still error free If the Qur'an was copied from the Bible then where are those errors ? And I have a best friend who is Christian when I asked him about Trinity he said only one sentence I don't believe in trinity ???????? May Allah guide you
Silly muslims don't want to be reminded of the truth. They can't face it then they lies just like without lies deception islam dies.
As soon as he blatantly lied 4 or 5 times, I checked out. Got through 3 minutes
Exactly and the Muslims in the comments are just making me laugh 😂
@@aniso228 3 Gods?
So why does the Bible say, let US make man in our image
@@ClaytonBigsby89 I am a Christian but in this scenario, the word "Us" is translated from the Hebrew word "Ehohim," meaning God. In Hebrew, addressing yourself as a plural symbolized power. Therefore, God referred to himself as "Ehohim" which translates to a plural.
@@bradye.5511 so do you think Jesus Christ the son is no different than God? Even though they interacted as different beings in the gospels?
"من يهدي الله فهو المهتد ومن يضلل فلن تجد له وليا مرشدا
LOL this guy knows nothing.. the trinity is not dependent on each other nor created. Show me where it says that. You make up your own questions and your own answers. The bible clearly says in the beginning was the word and the Word was with God and the Word was God. You haven't debunked anything.
Words of god? Whys ur god’s book verses been taken out
Matthew 17:21
KJV: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting."
Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in א (original handwriting), B, θ, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Ethiopic manuscripts. It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient - C, D, K, L - as well as some other mss of the ancient versions. It is believed to have been assimilated from Mark.[12]
Matthew 18:11
KJV: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost."
Reason: This verse is lacking in א, B, L (original handwriting), θ, ƒ1, ƒ13, some old Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Georgian manuscripts, and such ancient sources as the Apostolic Canons, Eusebius, Jerome, and others. It is found in some other sources, not quite so ancient, such as D, K, W, X, and the Latin Vulgate. It is not found in any manuscript before the 5th century.[13] According to Bruce Metzger, "There can be little doubt that the words [...] are spurious here, being omitted by the earliest witnesses representing several textual types... [This verse was] manifestly borrowed by copyists from Luke 19:10."[14]
Matthew 23:14
KJV: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."
Reason: This verse is very similar to Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47. This verse is lacking altogether in א,B,D,L,Z,θ, ƒ1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic manuscripts, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. It appears before verse 13 in K,W, and several New Testament minuscules. It appears after verse 13 in ƒ13, some Italic and Syriac and Coptic manuscripts. The fact that it is absent from the most ancient sources of multiple text types and that the sources that do contain the verse disagree about its placement, as well as the fact that it is a repetition of verses found elsewhere, show "that verse 14 is an interpolation derived from the parallel in Mark 12:40 or Luke 20:47 is clear."[14]
Mark 7:16
KJV: "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear."
Reason: This verse is nearly identical with verses 4:9 and 4:23. This verse here is lacking in א,B,L,Δ (original handwriting), some Coptic mss. It is included in manuscripts only slightly less ancient, A,D,K,W,ƒ1,ƒ13, Italic manuscripts, the Vulgate, some other ancient versions. As it is missing in the very oldest resources and yet is identical to verses that remain, many editors seem confident in omitting its appearance here.[citation needed]
Mark 9:44 and 9:46
KJV: "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." (The verses are identical to each other, and to 9:48, which is still in the main text)
Reason: Both verses 44 and 46 are duplicates of verse 48, which remains in the text. Verses 44 and 46 are both lacking in א,B,C,L,W,ƒ1, and some manuscripts of the ancient versions, but appear in somewhat later sources such as A,D,K,θ, some Italic manuscripts and the Vulgate. It is possible that verse 48 was repeated by a copyist as an epistrophe, for an oratorical flourish.[15] The UBS text assigns this omission a confidence rating of A.
Mark 11:26
KJV: "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses."
Reason: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15. This verse appeared in the Complutensian Polyglot and most Textus Receptus editions but Erasmus omitted it and noted that it was missing from 'most' Greek manuscripts.[16] The verse is not in א,B,L,W,Δ,Ψ, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. The UBS edition gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A.
Mark 15:28
KJV: "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors.""
Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. It does not appear here in any New Testament manuscript prior to the end of the 6th century.[17]
Luke 17:36
KJV: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left."
Reason: It is possible that this verse is a repetition of Matthew 24:40. Even the King James Version had doubts about this verse, as it provided (in the original 1611 edition and still in many high-quality editions) a sidenote that said, "This 36th verse is wanting in most of the Greek copies." This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (1516-1535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st-3rd editions (1546-1550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), the margins of Stephanus' 4th edition (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's editions (1565-1604).[18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20]
John 5:3-4
Main article: John 5 § Interpolation (verses 3b-4)
KJV: "3[...] waiting for the moving of the water. 4For an Angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had." (Not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.)
Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek manuscripts that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [meaning occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the manuscripts that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording.[21] The UBS text gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. This verse was omitted from Edward Harwood's Greek NT (1776), marked as doubtful in Griesbach's editions (1777), and thereafter generally relegated to a footnote, enclosed in brackets, or omitted completely.
Henry Alford wrote, "The spuriousness of this controverted passage can hardly be questioned."[22] Without the words at issue the context simply states that a swimming or bathing pool in or near Jerusalem was a gathering place for sick and crippled people, some of whom sought to get into the pool (either for physical comfort or for ritual cleansing) and it was there that Jesus performed miraculous healing. However, the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. This passage in John 5 is the only mention of this pool - no such miraculous pool is mentioned in Josephus or other histories.[23] The words in question do not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and in those manuscripts that contain them they are sometimes marked as doubtful, and differ from manuscript to manuscript "with that extreme variation in the reading which so often indicates grounds for suspicion".[24]
The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, א, A (original hand), B, C (original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Verse 4 ("For an angel ...") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ("waiting for the stirring of the water ...") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (14th century), and an Egyptian manuscript. The concluding words of verse 3 but not any of verse 4 appear in D, 33 (9th century), and some Latin manuscripts. The entire italicized passage appears in C (third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), Δ,Θ,Ψ, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts - S,Λ,Π, and a few others - contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. Among the manuscripts that contain this sentence-and-a-half, there are many variations and permutations.[25]
The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: "... a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. 5And a certain man was there ...", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. Several modern versions similarly relegate those words to a footnote, and some others (such as Moffatt) include the words in the main text but are enclosed in brackets with an explanation in a footnote.
"Debunked Christianity in Just 1 Minute" when asked about the Trinity he immediately makes the mistake of saying The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit are three seperate Gods. This guy needs to learn what the Trinity is.
Verse have been taken out from the bible
Matthew 17:21
KJV: "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting."
Reason: The verse closely resembles Mark 9:29, but it is lacking in Matthew in א (original handwriting), B, θ, some Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Ethiopic manuscripts. It is, however, found in this place in some Greek mss not quite so ancient - C, D, K, L - as well as some other mss of the ancient versions. It is believed to have been assimilated from Mark.[12]
Matthew 18:11
KJV: "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost."
Reason: This verse is lacking in א, B, L (original handwriting), θ, ƒ1, ƒ13, some old Italic, Syriac, Coptic and Georgian manuscripts, and such ancient sources as the Apostolic Canons, Eusebius, Jerome, and others. It is found in some other sources, not quite so ancient, such as D, K, W, X, and the Latin Vulgate. It is not found in any manuscript before the 5th century.[13] According to Bruce Metzger, "There can be little doubt that the words [...] are spurious here, being omitted by the earliest witnesses representing several textual types... [This verse was] manifestly borrowed by copyists from Luke 19:10."[14]
Matthew 23:14
KJV: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."
Reason: This verse is very similar to Mark 12:40 and Luke 20:47. This verse is lacking altogether in א,B,D,L,Z,θ, ƒ1, Ethiopic, Armenian, several Italic, and Syrian and Coptic manuscripts, and the writings of several early Church Fathers. It appears before verse 13 in K,W, and several New Testament minuscules. It appears after verse 13 in ƒ13, some Italic and Syriac and Coptic manuscripts. The fact that it is absent from the most ancient sources of multiple text types and that the sources that do contain the verse disagree about its placement, as well as the fact that it is a repetition of verses found elsewhere, show "that verse 14 is an interpolation derived from the parallel in Mark 12:40 or Luke 20:47 is clear."[14]
Mark 7:16
KJV: "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear."
Reason: This verse is nearly identical with verses 4:9 and 4:23. This verse here is lacking in א,B,L,Δ (original handwriting), some Coptic mss. It is included in manuscripts only slightly less ancient, A,D,K,W,ƒ1,ƒ13, Italic manuscripts, the Vulgate, some other ancient versions. As it is missing in the very oldest resources and yet is identical to verses that remain, many editors seem confident in omitting its appearance here.[citation needed]
Mark 9:44 and 9:46
KJV: "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched." (The verses are identical to each other, and to 9:48, which is still in the main text)
Reason: Both verses 44 and 46 are duplicates of verse 48, which remains in the text. Verses 44 and 46 are both lacking in א,B,C,L,W,ƒ1, and some manuscripts of the ancient versions, but appear in somewhat later sources such as A,D,K,θ, some Italic manuscripts and the Vulgate. It is possible that verse 48 was repeated by a copyist as an epistrophe, for an oratorical flourish.[15] The UBS text assigns this omission a confidence rating of A.
Mark 11:26
KJV: "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses."
Reason: This verse is very similar to Matthew 6:15. This verse appeared in the Complutensian Polyglot and most Textus Receptus editions but Erasmus omitted it and noted that it was missing from 'most' Greek manuscripts.[16] The verse is not in א,B,L,W,Δ,Ψ, some Italic, Vulgate, Syriac, and Coptic manuscripts, and the Armenian and Georgian versions. The UBS edition gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A.
Mark 15:28
KJV: "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, "And he was numbered with the transgressors.""
Reasons: This verse is similar to Luke 22:37. It does not appear here in any New Testament manuscript prior to the end of the 6th century.[17]
Luke 17:36
KJV: "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left."
Reason: It is possible that this verse is a repetition of Matthew 24:40. Even the King James Version had doubts about this verse, as it provided (in the original 1611 edition and still in many high-quality editions) a sidenote that said, "This 36th verse is wanting in most of the Greek copies." This verse is missing from Tyndale's version (1534) and the Geneva Bible (1557). Among major Textus Receptus editions, this verse does not appear in the editions of Erasmus (1516-1535), Aldus (1518), Colinaeus (1534), Stephanus 1st-3rd editions (1546-1550), but it did appear in the Complutensian (1514), the margins of Stephanus' 4th edition (1551), and all of Elzivir's and Beza's editions (1565-1604).[18] In modern conservative Greek editions it is also omitted from the main text of Scrivener's Greek NT according to the Textus Receptus, and the two Majority Text editions. Verse 36 is included by very few Greek manuscripts of the Western text-type and by Old-Latin and Vulgate manuscripts.[19][20]
John 5:3-4
Main article: John 5 § Interpolation (verses 3b-4)
KJV: "3[...] waiting for the moving of the water. 4For an Angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had." (Not only is verse 4 omitted, but also the tail end of verse 3.)
Reason: It is considered unlikely that these words were in the original text of the Gospel. They are lacking in the "earliest and best witnesses", and several ancient Greek manuscripts that do contain them enclose them with markings indicating doubts about their authenticity, the passage contains words or expressions that appear nowhere else in John (such as the Greek words for "at a certain season [meaning occasionally]" and "stirring" and "diseases"), and the manuscripts that contain this verse differ among themselves as to the wording.[21] The UBS text gave the omission of this verse a confidence rating of A. This verse was omitted from Edward Harwood's Greek NT (1776), marked as doubtful in Griesbach's editions (1777), and thereafter generally relegated to a footnote, enclosed in brackets, or omitted completely.
Henry Alford wrote, "The spuriousness of this controverted passage can hardly be questioned."[22] Without the words at issue the context simply states that a swimming or bathing pool in or near Jerusalem was a gathering place for sick and crippled people, some of whom sought to get into the pool (either for physical comfort or for ritual cleansing) and it was there that Jesus performed miraculous healing. However, the words quoted above complicate this story by asserting that miraculous cures were already taking place at this pool in the absence of Jesus, owing to the unpredictable intervention of an (apparently invisible) angel. This passage in John 5 is the only mention of this pool - no such miraculous pool is mentioned in Josephus or other histories.[23] The words in question do not appear in the oldest manuscripts, and in those manuscripts that contain them they are sometimes marked as doubtful, and differ from manuscript to manuscript "with that extreme variation in the reading which so often indicates grounds for suspicion".[24]
The italicized words do not appear at all in p66, 75, א, A (original hand), B, C (original hand), L, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Latin Vulgate manuscripts, and in quotations of the story by several early Greek Fathers. Verse 4 ("For an angel ...") appears but without the concluding words of verse 3 ("waiting for the stirring of the water ...") in A (where it says the angel "bathed in the water" rather than "descended into the water"), L, 18 (14th century), and an Egyptian manuscript. The concluding words of verse 3 but not any of verse 4 appear in D, 33 (9th century), and some Latin manuscripts. The entire italicized passage appears in C (third hand), K (also with the angel "bathed in the water"), Δ,Θ,Ψ, and numerous other manuscripts, and some Italic, Syriac, Coptic, and Armenian manuscripts, and several Latin Fathers, Some manuscripts - S,Λ,Π, and a few others - contain the words enclosed by marks of doubt. Among the manuscripts that contain this sentence-and-a-half, there are many variations and permutations.[25]
The Revised Version (1881) omitted the italicized words from its main text, making the passage read: "... a multitude of them that were sick, blind, halt, withered. 5And a certain man was there ...", and as a side-note, "Many ancient authorities insert, wholly or in part," and here present the italicized words exactly as they appeared in the KJV. Several modern versions similarly relegate those words to a footnote, and some others (such as Moffatt) include the words in the main text but are enclosed in brackets with an explanation in a footnote.
@@6yg5 Bro copy and pasted it straight from wikipedia
@@bruhmanthetruthprovider2201 excuses?
@@bruhmanthetruthprovider2201 John 5:7-8
Main article: Johannine Comma
KJV: "7For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the holy Ghost, and these three are one. 8And there are three that bear witness in earth, ..."
Modern versions: (omitted from main text and not in a footnote)
Reason: A multitude of books have been devoted to just this verse, including A Vindication of I John V, 7 from the Objections of M. Griesbach [by Thomas Burgess] (1821, London); Das Comma Ioanneum: Auf Seine Hewrkunft Untersucht [The Johannine Comma, an examination of its origin] by Karl Künstle (1905, Frieburg, Switz.); An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture by Sir Isaac Newton (published posthumously 1785); Letters to Mr. Archdeacon [George] Travis in answer to his Defence of the Three Heavenly Witnesses by Richard Porson (1790, London); A New Plea for the Authenticity of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses or Porson's Letters to Travis Eclectically Examined by Rev. Charles Forster (1867, London), Memoir of The Controversy respecting the Three Heavenly Witnesses, I John V.7 ˈ by 'Criticus' [Rev. William Orme] (1830, London), reprinted (1872, Boston, "a new edition, with notes and an appendix by Ezra Abbot" ); and The Three Witnesses - the disputed text in St. John, considerations new and old by Henry T. Armfield (1893, London).[50] Eberhard Nestle, writing in Germany at the end of 19th century, said, "The fact that it [the Comma Johanneum] is still defended even from the Protestant side is interesting only from a pathological point of view."[51] F.H.A. Scrivener, usually regarded as a defender of the KJV text, said of this verse, "The authenticity of [this verse] will, perhaps, no longer be maintained by anyone whose judgment ought to have weight; but this result has been arrived at after a long and memorable controversy, which helped keep alive, especially in England, some interest in Biblical studies."[52] The UBS gives this omission a confidence rating of A.
Early Church Fathers did not mention this verse, even when gathering verses to support the Doctrine of the Trinity.[53] This verse first appears, not in a New Testament manuscript, but in a fifth century Confession of Faith, and after that it was assimilated into mss of the Latin Vulgate, but it was (because of the lack of Greek documentary support) omitted from the first two "Textus Receptus" printed editions of the New Testament (namely those edited by Erasmus, 1516 and 1519),[54] as well as some other very early Textus Receptus editions, such as Aldus 1518, Gerbelius 1521, Cephalius 1524 and 1526, and Colinaeus 1534.[55] Stephanus (Robert Estienne), in his influential Editio Regia of 1550 (which was the model edition of the Textus Receptus in England),[56] was the first to provide an apparatus showing variant readings and showed this verse was lacking in seven Greek manuscripts.[57] Martin Luther rejected this verse as a forgery and excluded it from his German translation of the Bible while he lived - it was inserted into the text by other hands after his death.[58] The first appearance of the Comma in the main text of a Greek New Testament manuscript is no earlier than the 15th century.[59]
Doubts about its genuineness were indicated in printed Greek New Testaments as early as that of the first two editions (1515 and 1519) of Erasmus of Rotterdam, who simply left the verse out because he could not find a Greek manuscript containing it, providing a comment that "this is all I find in the Greek manuscripts".[60] Expressions of doubt also appeared in the edition of Stephen Courcelles (Étienne de Courcelles), in 1658, and from Johann Jakob Griesbach's edition of 1775. Most critical editions relegated the Comma to a footnote or otherwise marked it as doubtful.[61] The American Bible Union,[62] a Baptist organization, omitted this verse from the new English translation of the New Testament it published in 1865. The Roman Catholic Church was slightly more resistant about yielding up this verse; an 1897 decision of the Holy Inquisition forbade a Catholic "to deny or even express doubt about the authenticity of" the Johannine Comma, but this was effectively reversed by a declaration of the Holy Office on June 2, 1927, which allowed scholars to express doubts and even denials of the genuineness of the Comma, tempered by the fact that the Vatican would have the final authority.[63] The 1966 Jerusalem Bible omits the Comma without a footnote. The spurious nature of this verse is so notorious[64] that even the Revised Version of 1881 did not bother to include nor provide a footnote for this verse, and many other modern versions do likewise. Ezra Abbot wrote, "It may be said that the question [of excluding this verse] is obsolete; that the spuriousness of the disputed passage had long been conceded by all intelligent and fair-minded scholars. This is true, but a little investigation will show that great ignorance still exists on the subject among the less-informed in the Christian community."[65] Even the two leading editions of the so-called Majority Text (Robinson & Pierpont, and Hodges & Farstad) omit this verse (the Hodges & Farstad edition acknowledge the 'Textus Receptus' version of this verse in a footnote).
Other omitted verses
Matthew 20:16 (b)
KJV: "16[...] for many be called, but few chosen."
Modern versions (RV): (omitted without a footnote).
Reason: These familiar words are not in א, B,L,Z, several cursives, Sahidic, and some Boharic and Ethiopic manuscripts, but appear in slightly more recent manuscripts such as C,D,W,θ, and Latin manuscripts. Tischendorff's 1841 Greek NT was reportedly the first printed edition to omit this clause. The same words appear in Matthew 22:14.
Mark 6:11 (b)
KJV: "11And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear you, when ye depart thence, shake off the dust under your feet for a testimony against them. Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for Sodom and Gomorrah in the Day of Judgement, than for that city. 12And they went out, and preached that men should repent."
RV: (omits second sentence of verse 11).
Reason: Many (perhaps most) modern versions emulate the Revised Version and simply omit the sentence in question, without any explanatory comment. This is a complete sentence and yet it did not receive, in the Textus Receptus editions, a verse number of its own. It does not appear here in the majority of important codices, such as א,B,C,D,L,W,Δ,Θ, and Latin, Sahidic, and some Syriac and Boharic manuscripts. It does, however, appear in some significant manuscripts, including ƒ1,13, A, two very old Latin manuscripts, and some Syriac and Boharic manuscripts, and with slight differences in minuscule 33 (9th century). It was already doubted even before the KJV; this sentence does not appear in Wycliff (1380), the Bishops' Bible (1568), and the Rheims (1582). Westcott and Hort omitted it and did not even mention it in their Appendix volume, nor is it mentioned in Scrivener's Plain Introduction to Criticism of the New Testament, nor is it mentioned in Metzger's Commentary, nor does it get even a footnote in the Souter[66][failed verification] or UBS Greek New Testament. Henry Alford's edition of the New Testament includes this sentence in the main text, but bracketed and italicized, with the brief footnote: "omitted in most ancient authorities: probably inserted here from Matthew 10:15."[67] The same two sentences do appear, without any quibbling about their authenticity, in Matthew 10:14-15, and it is plausible that some very early copyist assimilated the sentence into Mark, perhaps as a sidenote subsequently copied into the main text. In any case, its omission from Mark 6:11 does not affect its unchallenged presence in Matthew 10:15.
Luke 4:8 (b)
KJV: "And Jesus answered and said unto to him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve."
Modern versions (RV): (omits the words "Get thee behind me, Satan:").
Reason: The emphasized words, although by now a very familiar quotation, are omitted from the RV and most other modern versions; it was also omitted by the Wycliffe (1380) and Rheims (1582) versions. This clause is not found in א,B,D,L,W,Ξ, ƒ1, several cursives, and Latin, Sahidic, and many Syriac and Boharic manuscripts. It is present in A,Θ,Ψ,ƒ13, and some Italic manuscripts. It is believed probable that the clause was inserted here by assimilation because the corresponding version of this narrative, in Matthew, contains a somewhat similar rebuke to the Devil (in the KJV, "Get thee hence, Satan,"; Matthew 4:10, which is the way this rebuke reads in Luke 4:8 in the Tyndale (1534), Great Bible (also called the Cranmer Bible) (1539), and Geneva (1557) versions), whose authenticity is not disputed, and because the very same words are used in a different situation in Matthew 16:23 and Mark 8:33. The omission of this clause from Luke 4:8 in critical texts is so well-established that no comment about the omission appears in the Appendix to Westcott & Hort, in Scrivener's Plain Introduction to Textual Criticism, or in the UBS New Testament.[citation needed]
@@6yg5 Every single one of those passages is still in the KJV and older bibles lol
I was Christian before watching and I believed in Jesus and Holy Trinity as one God, but now I am still Christian and believe in that even more. My faith in Jesus, God and Holy spirit grows even more and stronger.
you're very delusional, where does it state jesus and the holy trinity are all one God???
@@thislogicfrIn the Bible. 😂
@@therealmaskriz5716 name me the verses
@@thislogicfr You don't get to demand very specific verses that would be fitting personally to you lol. Not a Christian at all but trinity and its dynamic is way too obvious in the Bible. Even first century Christians such as Ignatius of Antioch wrote about the deity of Christ, Holy Spirit and of Father yet talked about one God with strict monotheistic interpretation. You don't get to demand aother religion a standard you put on your own, you cannot try to prove a religion looking from a very sided view of another. have you even really studied any theology your life?
Can you give me very specific verses on how Quran demands you pray the Salah 5 times a day please? Since it is a pillar of Islam, I would require specific cases on how many times a day, the rakaat of all the Salah and the way to pray them by rules. Also how to take wuduu. These are vital for the religion so please give me the quranic verses specifying its strict rules.
@@thislogicfrread the whole book because if we mention verses for example john 10:30 or Revelation 22:13 or John 8:48-59 but as most Muslims do they will ignore it and interpet it wrongly. That's why I suggest for you to read the Bible because context>verse. I hope you have good day/life. May God bless you sir
"The Quran was revealed by ANGEL Gabriel"
1813
Il Corinthians 11
And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms
himself into an ANGEL.
Galatians 1
But even if we, or an ANGEL from heaven,
preach any other gospel to you than what we
have preached to you, let him be accursed.
😂😂😂
The Bible was never meant to be the "Word of God." It's just a consolidated collection of many different books. The Council of Nicaea, a council of Christian bishops from 1,700 years ago, decided to determine which biblical books were canonical and which were not. They decided to leave out the Apocrypha and the Gnostic writings, despite their contents being highly significant.
Remember, only the wise can get those in, although in books such as Esdras, and the lost book of eden, as well as Enoch, and the book of the Macabees spoke about the messiah (the elect one), Reasoning on the belief in God, and all the other topics that'll help society. As it is written; " My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge " and we all know God gifts wisdom to those he loves. Peace be unto you, Stay safe-bless.
@@Raction_ wdym "only the wise can get those in"?
@@deygnymedes9827 not to say only the wise can read them, for, their out and anyone can- but to read them, and the "bible" and to still hold truth to the promises God makes and still hold true to the roots of his word, without taking away or adding to it, and teaching, and informing it to both young and old alike takes someone with a fair bit of wisdom, while making all seem as natural as possible- without religion. If you are able to read them and trace back to everything to the bit called the bible, and hold firm your belief in Yeshua (Jesus) and conversate about what was written and relate it to all aspects in life to even save or open the mind of a non-believer, consider it a blessing because god gives knowledge and wisdom to those he loves- as written in ecclesiasties.
The council of Nicaea did not decide the Canon. The fuck are you even on about? The gnostic writings come 300-400 years after Christ and cannot be traced back to a single Apostle.
Nicaea was a council that was called by the Emperor due to Arius, a prominent bishop, saying that Christ was not begotten but made. He said that he was still the Son of God but not eternal. It doesn’t help your case. Stop watching online scam artists.
It is a myth that the council of Nicaea chose the books of the Bible. The council of Nicaea didn't even talk about the Canon. That was the council of Carthage if I remember right. The council of Nicaea was organized by Constantine to answer the question about Aryan and if his views were heretical. He did so in order to unify the church. The church though, condemned him outright which was against Constantine's hopes. He was disappointed. Constantine's sister was an Ayrian and convinced him to become one also. The myths about Constantine are prevalent but they are myths, in this regard.
Thank you for making this video. You convinced me even more that Jesus is Lord.
Glory to Jesus our Lord and Saviour.
can't forget the father and the holy spirit 🤡
Prophet Jesus the servant of Allah and your prophet Muhammad the last prophet of Allah

“Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”
John 14:6 NIV
The father who created the whole universe, The son who teach us how to live like and The holy spirit who stay with us for blessing all time. There are not 3 gods, there is only one god who has three faces. thank you🙂
did the father make everything?
Uh... isn't god capable of doing all 3? and his "son" is not a god and it's not "his son" , We muslims believe that Jesus was a messenger of god like many others
@@xKuusouka I know akhi im a muslim as well alhamdullilah
@@xKuusouka You believe BS from a person who commit many nefarious acts
@@xKuusouka many others? so everyone born with only mortal mothers? everyone one had holy spirit? everyone mentioned as sinless and the most purest creature?
they have the title as word of god and spirit of god?!
you even dont know the quran!
quran claiming how jesus is part of the god! because he is the word and the spirit of the god!
non of other prophets has this nor holy spirit nor word!
even quran claiming how jesus is who will judge the humanity in the last day and evne how he will be the only one who will defeat the evil in the last day!
not muhammed nor others!
As a Christian, I have two issues that really prevent me from ever converting to Islam.
In the first sourates it is written that the Quran is a book coming from God even Though we know Mohamed could not have written the Quran himself and that the Quran was written by his successor after oral transmission from Mohamed. That means that some sourates don't come from the mouth of the prophet Mohamed? Why is it "this book" and not"these words"? The Quran is crystal clear, the Arabic "ktb" means book and nothing else.
The whole Jesus case is really disturbing. If he was not crucified then the purpose of his messianic mission is not fulfilled. Islam does not only reject the divinity of Jesus Christ but also his title of Messiah, because he would not fulfill what the prophets of the old testament said about the messiah. I struggle to understand a Christ who was not crucified, and who will come for destroying the christians in the laterdays.
Jesus Chris fulfilled his duty, every prophet that came to this planet. Had 1 mission, which is to deliver the message which is to worship God only and not associate with him partners. God is perfect and he doesn't need another creature to be perfect. Which is why only he deserves to be worshipped. AND DO not lie! Jesus in Islam is described as the messiah(AL-MASIH in arabic)
Just like God saved prophet Jonah, Abraham, many other prophets. He saved Jesus! yall claim to love Jesus but yall dont even follow MOST of his teachings!! You guys follow the church and not read your own bible. most of christians are not circumcised/consume alcohol, drugs/gambling/and tons of other major sins one of them is allowing LGBTQ to get married and have rights.
Jesus own mother may God be pleased with her, has a whole chapter in the Quran and she is highly respected. We just dont believe she is divine.
If Jesus is divine cause he was born miraculously then Adam is Divine, Yahya(John the baptist) is divine....
those are all human beings, they are dependent ! they depend on food, sleepiness, etc to live ! God is beyond all that, to associate partners with him is very disrespectful, thats why he forgives all sins(if you repent) except associating partners with him
@@youmysonbish DO you read bible? I show you scripture from Bible about Jesus Will you accept it or Still just call it corrupt?
Bible claim him to be God and every knee will bow and confess him as lord.
I know you muslim normally you do not read just recite what People say.
@@enockt6218 exactly
@@ZaynElAbideen but that is the very thing that i don't understand. When the prophet Muhammad told, because he was speaking to his companions and not reading or writing, saying "This book is...", well, but there was no book at the moment he was speaking. The book came after. Did he assumed that someone was going to write down his words?
Why is it referred as a book and not as "words" or "speech"? At the moment the prophet Muhammad was speaking, there was no book, but words. I find it very very confusing.
Yeah quran is a illogical biol
I saw Jesus and he is the most beautiful ever!!!His light is the brightest and his love is the greatest.! THERE IS NO ONE LIKE JESUS
So like is his hair blonde or brown or white or....
Where did you see him, on the street?
@@D-03IbrahimSiddiqi I saw his beautiful gown and he was so bright. The room was so bright. He is so beautiful . So nice. When I was there I was at home. Most of my life I felt like I don't belong and most people didn't like me. I didn't wanna come back because it was so beautiful there. Best experience ever
@@Kary-k1z did u guys become best friends after this?
Those who are not capable of understanding the trinity should not speak about it
That would be no one.
Thank you for this video🙏🏼 before watching it I was a Christian and was scared of what you might say thank god I still believe in the trinity ☦️
They are lying and pointing away from the mistakes of the Qur'an..
@@llll6581 can you show a mistake in the quran?
@@llll6581 bro what. Show me where
@@ziproxyy 2 simple examples. Moon didn't split. Jesus was crucified.. and if he was not, your god is a liar and a deceiver because he led billions of people to hell by letting them think that it wasnt Jesus but someone who looked like him...crazy stuff..
@@RealDamianXD 2 simple examples. Moon didn't split. Jesus was crucified.. and if he was not, your god is a liar and a deceiver because he led billions of people to hell by letting them think that it wasnt Jesus but someone who looked like him...crazy stuff..
"It is not the eyes that are blind, but the hearts."
- Quran 22:46
yes muslims so blind they could not see ... muhammad banging a kid is the work of the devil
"Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools."
-romans 1:22
@@shroomitechromee"How shall Allah guide a people who disbelieved after their belief and had witnessed that the Messenger is true and clear signs had come to them? And Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people." Quran 3:86
Jesus love you my savior king
ما شاء الله عنكم يا اخواني ربنا يحفظكم ويثبتكم ويزيدكم علم الاسلام دين الحق اتمنى له التوفيق والثبات والسعادة والاستقامة على الإسلام
Please read the Bible, New Testament!!
God bless his soul. Pray for him to find the true knowledge
he mentioned john 3 times claiming they were different people even tho all 3 names he mentioned belong to john the apostle
He has the true knowledge and the true knowledge is jesus isn't god and he himself prayed to Allah 😂
@@freezedupfrost6064 Jesus prayed to God yes to be specific he prayed to YHWH
@@teatusnoone6332 Who's YHWH?
Why did he pray like a muslim then?
‘he fell with his face to the ground and prayed, ‘My Father’ (Matthew 26:39)
‘During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.’ (Hebrews 5:7)
?
@@freezedupfrost6064 YHWH Is the pronounced Yahweh and is the name of the God Jews and Christians pray to.
as a christian this guy knows nothing about the bible
im not even lying before watching this i was intailly doing research about religions and after watching this I can confirm i am now Christian
May Allah SWT bring ease in your efforts.. As and when I watch any of your videos, I get so happy and enlightened that sincere duas for you come out from my heart ..
God bless you all..
Ali Dawah is a fool
@@iluvucuzjesus5347 how so?
@@iluvucuzjesus5347
What ever, but the fact is Ali Dawah is one of those, whom Allah SwT Himself chose to get to Hidayat. So to Allah SWT, he must be a special person..
It hardly matters, what people think and say about a person..
@@kouserwani4912 So what your saying is character which he does NOT have does not matter .
@@iluvucuzjesus5347 prove it