Why are here critics about Karpov? He likes to play and he is still stronger as the most of us. By the way. Karpov won in this tournament against the tournament winner Magnus Carlsen. I hope that this stop the critics ...
firendable It was a blitz game and Karpov was never a good blitzer! And Magnus was always a blitz monster. By the way: Magnus Carlsen won yesterday the Rapidchess World championship. If he win the today starting Blitz World Championship, he is the first person ever to hold all 3 titles at the same time.
Yes, karpov was for 20 years under the top 5 blitz blayer in the world. he is still under the top 200 blitz player at this moment. That is a blitz ranking that the most chess player dream to have.
Excelente video sencillo pero sustancioso entre dos grandes del Ajedrez, Karpov con ese gran historial en este deporte, con un estilo de juego tan sublime y pulcro sin lugar a dudas de lo mejores jugadores de la elite y Kramnik que nos igue regalando buenas participaciones no tan constantes pero fue quien destrono a Kasparov en el titulo mundial y eso ya es historia.
Karpov is a great player who had the title for a solid 10 years! However, Kramnik is a very accurate and solid player who has quite a few years on Karpov. And think in this game, Karpov was too aggressive too fast and over extended his pawn chain on the king side which led to a lot of weaknesses in the middle game. Which then, Kramnik started taking advantage of.
Karpov is like "I know what you're doing Kramnik - nod, nod", "Hold on, there's something else, oh, that's another trap - nod nod" , "that's right, I'm gonna.. wait, but he can still move the Queen....nod - nod" after a minute or so Karpov "never mind, lets make it quick" lol
It`s silly to compare Carlsen`s and Nakamura`s speed with Karpov. He is 60 years old. I am more than positive that none of todays top GMs will play as good as karpov or Kasparov once they reach 45+.... That`s simply because todays GMs are far less ceative and far far more into memorising the openings and lines. I am not saying that`s wrong, it`s just a new age. Btw, no one played as fast as Capablanka :)))
Quanto mi piacerebbe poter leggere qualche commento in italiano. Ma nel mio paese, tutto quello che ha a che fare con il cervello, salvo strette minoraze, è ormai bandito. Aiutateci!!! Comunque, Karpov è stato ed è un grande scacchista. Solamente, è fisiologico che con l'età che avanza, faccia fatica a competere con chi è molto più giovane di lui.
Look closely. Karpov didn't move the clock closer towards him. He simply pulled it back and pushed it forward again. Kramnik was the one who pulled it towards him.
yeah blitz is for the young like Carlsen, but karpov is one of the greatest still but i do like kramink just like his calmness. that was a great video thanks for posting
+Mac Mariano Para mí el más sorprendente caso es el de Korchnoi, que a los 80 años le ganó una partida a Caruana en plena forma y hoy a sus 84 años, sigue dando peleas participando en abiertos.
Anyone else bothered by Kramnik moving the time clock closer to his side right before the start? Karpov set it in the middle, and then Kramnik slid it more to his side.
@atrebil71 Ho detto che è inutile aspettarsi commenti in italiano su un filmato pubblicato in inglese in cui, a rigor di logica, anche un italiano commenterebbe in inglese. Per il resto mi sembra che siamo d'accordo sul fatto che saper giocare bene a scacchi non implica l'essere più intelligenti e quindi il non vedere eventuali commenti di italiani qui, con la premessa di cui sopra, non significa necessariamente che la maggior parte degli italiani sia stupida. Salutoni
Well i will say that the best blitz players are the best classical players who have deep understanding of the position. Now does age matter?? Yes if a player is active with current chess developments than yes he will have current knowlege plus experiance. So players like kasparov and karpov will anytime beat current FM and IMs and GMs (excluding the top Super GMs). But when u talk about current young top players like Carlsen and Aronian and Nakamura and Caruana, well they too have deep understanding of position and they study chess a lot which makes up for the experiance. Then these players also have stamina and activ brain and they do have novelties up their sleeves.
@gpbiancoli Se io faccio un commento in Italiano su un qualcosa pubblicato da un Inglese, sarei un maleducato? Mi pare assurdo. Per il resto, non mi considero un qualunquista solo perchè registro che nel mio Paese un generale degrado culturale. E non mi considero intelligente, solo perchè gioco a scacchi.
@atrebil71 visto che l'autore ha pubblicato in inglese, è normale, oltre che buona educazione, commentare in inglese, anche se si è italiani. Inoltre due appunti: 1) il tuo commento sull'Italia è qualunquista e questa superficialità è ancora peggio del "non essere intelligenti" 2) giocare bene a scacchi non significa essere più intelligenti della norma. Significa allenarsi e studiare per saper giocare bene a scacchi. Punto. Non è che, visto che sai giocare a scacchi, ti credi intelligente? Ciao
+Danilo Albergaria Kasparov won, coz he was near the table and both of them (kramnik and Karpov) agreed that kasparov is the winner. After the game kasparov shows the best answer and that why he won. this is chess bejbe :D
karpov - one of the all time greats, on the very top.
Not is not
@@now1769 he is
Why are here critics about Karpov?
He likes to play and he is still stronger as the most of us.
By the way. Karpov won in this tournament against the tournament winner Magnus Carlsen.
I hope that this stop the critics ...
firendable
It was a blitz game and Karpov was never a good blitzer! And Magnus was always a blitz monster.
By the way:
Magnus Carlsen won yesterday the Rapidchess World championship. If he win the today starting Blitz World Championship, he is the first person ever to hold all 3 titles at the same time.
Karpov was excellent blitz player what are you saying?:)
Yes, karpov was for 20 years under the top 5 blitz blayer in the world.
he is still under the top 200 blitz player at this moment. That is a blitz ranking that the most chess player dream to have.
+FrankyBKK actually karpov was also a good blitz player. he beat kasparov in blitz tournaments many times .
firendable At 13 years old.
Karpov and Kramnik - legends!
I like karpov, he has a good style
But karpov said
Style?, I have no style
- Anatoly karpov
(Search in his qoutes)
@@imagirlbtwuwu8053 They said the same about Fischer, too. In reality, both of them had rather distinctive styles.
Love Karpov,a legend of the English opening and all round nice fellow, he should be the head of fide .
Excelente video sencillo pero sustancioso entre dos grandes del Ajedrez, Karpov con ese gran historial en este deporte, con un estilo de juego tan sublime y pulcro sin lugar a dudas de lo mejores jugadores de la elite y Kramnik que nos igue regalando buenas participaciones no tan constantes pero fue quien destrono a Kasparov en el titulo mundial y eso ya es historia.
Karpov is my favorite chess players of all times!
Mine too!
He's the player I most admire... truly a man who understands chess, understands the board... has lots of respect for the game... :]
the young karpov (especially 1978- 1982) cannot be beaten by anyone in blitz & in a long games
Karpov is a great player who had the title for a solid 10 years! However, Kramnik is a very accurate and solid player who has quite a few years on Karpov.
And think in this game, Karpov was too aggressive too fast and over extended his pawn chain on the king side which led to a lot of weaknesses in the middle game. Which then, Kramnik started taking advantage of.
Karpov is like "I know what you're doing Kramnik - nod, nod", "Hold on, there's something else, oh, that's another trap - nod nod" , "that's right, I'm gonna.. wait, but he can still move the Queen....nod - nod" after a minute or so Karpov "never mind, lets make it quick" lol
It`s silly to compare Carlsen`s and Nakamura`s speed with Karpov. He is 60 years old. I am more than positive that none of todays top GMs will play as good as karpov or Kasparov once they reach 45+.... That`s simply because todays GMs are far less ceative and far far more into memorising the openings and lines. I am not saying that`s wrong, it`s just a new age. Btw, no one played as fast as Capablanka :)))
Karpov is very strong player> but he is very old man/// years give some times
Kramnik looking at Karpov like "So you were beaten three times by who? hehehehehehehehehe"
Quanto mi piacerebbe poter leggere qualche commento in italiano.
Ma nel mio paese, tutto quello che ha a che fare con il cervello, salvo strette minoraze, è ormai bandito. Aiutateci!!!
Comunque, Karpov è stato ed è un grande scacchista. Solamente, è fisiologico che con l'età che avanza, faccia fatica a competere con chi è molto più giovane di lui.
Look closely. Karpov didn't move the clock closer towards him. He simply pulled it back and pushed it forward again. Kramnik was the one who pulled it towards him.
yeah blitz is for the young like Carlsen, but karpov is one of the greatest still but i do like kramink just like his calmness. that was a great video thanks for posting
not a prob karpov, u r a great chess player!!!:)
He's not made for Blitz, he may calculate every possible move but needs time. Nevertheless a Genius beyond reasoning.
He is almost 25 years older than Kramnik! When he was young, he was an excellent blitz player, and played fast in classical games, too.
3:09 see the face of the audient looking at the board.......
LOL!
I loled, notice how kramnik reaches the clock, and while karpov nods, he totally moves it towards him.
Thanks for uploading!
If one loses on time having an equal or winning position, it doesn't feel like losing. Karpov just doesn't want to make silly moves.
Great video, ty for posting!
No problem
Too slow old Karpov :(
La mayoría juega menos al llegar a viejos pero hay casos de viejos prodigios como reshevky que mantuvo un buen nivel de grande también.
+Mac Mariano Para mí el más sorprendente caso es el de Korchnoi, que a los 80 años le ganó una partida a Caruana en plena forma y hoy a sus 84 años, sigue dando peleas participando en abiertos.
I'll like to see how Kramnik will perform when he's approaching 60.
he is 50
at that level, blitz is definitely a younger man's game...
Anyone else bothered by Kramnik moving the time clock closer to his side right before the start? Karpov set it in the middle, and then Kramnik slid it more to his side.
Poor Karpov, no one is immortal.
Karpov is very serius!
infinite concentration!
nah
He's also older too. Lets not forget that guys.
Is that Ljubomir Ljubojević in the cardigan and red necktie in the front?
I wish overhead cameras were used. :)
Kramnik: King of the double-chin effect
@ivolgabb You are totally right!
father time was playing like he never heard of clocks
Kramnik is extremely handsome for a chess player who has been a world champion! Brain and beauty altogether ... I am in love with you Kramnik!
I bet at slow time controls Karpov would still beat young low level GM's.
What were the time controls for this match? And what was the end result?
@atrebil71 Ho detto che è inutile aspettarsi commenti in italiano su un filmato pubblicato in inglese in cui, a rigor di logica, anche un italiano commenterebbe in inglese.
Per il resto mi sembra che siamo d'accordo sul fatto che saper giocare bene a scacchi non implica l'essere più intelligenti e quindi il non vedere eventuali commenti di italiani qui, con la premessa di cui sopra, non significa necessariamente che la maggior parte degli italiani sia stupida.
Salutoni
Karpov had a winning position whereas kramnik's position was a bit cramped and far behind in development.
+carlo rustico Time always sucks
you can see that by 360p????
que diferencia hay entre los jugadores?
karpov win this game
양익서 why?
in this game time is left.
Karpov timed out, so Kramnik won.
The clock!!!
Сидят как будто учитель и ученик)
What don't you get vertyy ?
poor karpov. it's almost like he doesnt care about time, he just likes getting winning positions, which he had.
وربي كفو تم الدعس
What chess clocks are those?
DGT XL electronic chess clock.
what is the reason that he is in the prison??
you dont seem to be into women... but Alexandra Kosteniuk and Jennifer Shahade are extremely beautiful and they are chess geniuses
whos win?
Karpov is not bad chess player
age is matter?
yea but not training every day even more
+cumi udang blitz is not for him i guess
+cumi udang compare Fischer at the age of 29 and after he comes back at the age of 50, yes age matters in any kind of sport.
Karpov was one of the best blitz players in the world during his prime.
Who won?
Ok, im only playing chess for fun on school brakes so im not fimilier with eny of this xD
you just have to see the score in to the title... says 0-1 which means karpov (0) and kramnik (1) cause he... kramnik was the player that won.
+athos91 good lesson in how to answer a reasonable question like a snide prat
Good question.It means that was a bad video.
@TheReddwarff100 he still so good
Well i will say that the best blitz players are the best classical players who have deep understanding of the position. Now does age matter?? Yes if a player is active with current chess developments than yes he will have current knowlege plus experiance. So players like kasparov and karpov will anytime beat current FM and IMs and GMs (excluding the top Super GMs). But when u talk about current young top players like Carlsen and Aronian and Nakamura and Caruana, well they too have deep understanding of position and they study chess a lot which makes up for the experiance. Then these players also have stamina and activ brain and they do have novelties up their sleeves.
,,Doesn ' t means if men is older that he is smarter '' .Boby Fischer after becameing the worldchampion.
Watching Karpov calculate his moves is like watching a child using their fingers to add. The older you get, the slower the brain power :0)
Who disliked this video? perhaps a blunder, trying to click "Likes"
i was waiting for someone to fart
no he is just counting the amount of takes. That simple
Kramnik shalom aleihem...
DGT XL
Karpov castles queenside with 10 seconds left
so who won?
Karpov lost his timer ran out
why do u say that?
@awe3774 why? :o
why?
@moviecritic6 who said I play chess?! by the way, I forgive you!
Karpov should not be playing Blitz. He seems like a guy who really needs his time to formulate the best possible plan; much like Kasparov.
@gpbiancoli Se io faccio un commento in Italiano su un qualcosa pubblicato da un Inglese, sarei un maleducato? Mi pare assurdo. Per il resto, non mi considero un qualunquista solo perchè registro che nel mio Paese un generale degrado culturale.
E non mi considero intelligente, solo perchè gioco a scacchi.
girls love to watch chess
At the start, they just wanna play chess!
Bueno esq Karpov ya esta grande....
i like how chess resembles a silent war
@wario356 LOL! @ Kramnik's face!
@atrebil71 visto che l'autore ha pubblicato in inglese, è normale, oltre che buona educazione, commentare in inglese, anche se si è italiani.
Inoltre due appunti:
1) il tuo commento sull'Italia è qualunquista e questa superficialità è ancora peggio del "non essere intelligenti"
2) giocare bene a scacchi non significa essere più intelligenti della norma. Significa allenarsi e studiare per saper giocare bene a scacchi. Punto. Non è che, visto che sai giocare a scacchi, ti credi intelligente?
Ciao
wow... why does he do that to himself? it's blitz.. there's no room for such long thinks. u have to play on instinct.
He's too old for game that fast.
+1
that's SOBER
someone farted oops, psychology won the game
He jokes it because of what Kramnik is wearing. Like a prison shirt.
Kramnik was in prison? are you joking ha ha
Kramnik did.
I did. 3:43
Karpov think too much
karpov slow thinking
karpov is rusty it seems
Vladimir Kramnik lebih tinggi dari Anatoly Karpov....
Karpov genius,I dont like xadrez blitz is terrible game
Too old..too slow.....
too weak, too slow
karpov just thinks to slow... that's why kramnik won!
Karpov - bot...
Kasparov 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Who won?
kramnik
+Danilo Albergaria Kasparov won, coz he was near the table and both of them (kramnik and Karpov) agreed that kasparov is the winner. After the game kasparov shows the best answer and that why he won. this is chess bejbe :D