Shaykh Khaled Abou El Fadl’s Halaqa on Hijab | Part 2

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 дек 2024

Комментарии • 43

  • @stephenconnolly1830
    @stephenconnolly1830 3 года назад +6

    @8:45 the Professor uses the Arabic terminology "Asbab al-Nuzul" the circumstances of revelation concerning the Qur'anic Ayat.

  • @mariamasha5619
    @mariamasha5619 3 года назад +18

    Thank you for stating the truth. I wore hijab thinking the covering of the head was mandatory, now I'm trying to study the verses listening to both sides (head covering compulsory or not) and the verses are clear, we must put the veil over the chest to cover it. Put your khimar around the chest to cover it. I don't know why scholars insist on the covering of the head too. May GOD Guide us.

    • @NAH-vk6pk
      @NAH-vk6pk 3 года назад

      I been wanting to see you uncovered for some time now since I guided you this is foolish guy who teaching you something out of the ordinary. It’s ok wear your underwear only and pray it’s ok. Don’t even make a shower … said satan to you and you followed.

    • @NAH-vk6pk
      @NAH-vk6pk 3 года назад +1

      For argument the prophets wives are our mothers and the best of women. So wouldn’t it be more pious and rewarding in the sight of Allah to copy their actions.?
      Do not follow your desire.!
      I dare you to make dua to Allah to open your ears and eyes to the truth and this guy is far from truthfulness.

    • @zahinelahi2655
      @zahinelahi2655 3 года назад +13

      @@NAH-vk6pk your ignorance is showing. The Quran itself says about the Prophet's wives that "You are not like any other woman". Rules are different for the Prophet and his wives. The Quran says that the Prophet's wives are not allowed to marry anyone after his death. Are you going to say we should follow this example too and ban widow marriage?

    • @tisko7188
      @tisko7188 3 года назад +7

      @@NAH-vk6pk I can see your ignorance. Please try to learn.and this guy is one of the most respected scholar. Your argument is still very vague. You just insulted him before hearing his side. Don't be an ignorant

    • @camelialasfer8077
      @camelialasfer8077 2 года назад

      C’est simple, c’est une question politique et traditionnelle

  • @sevilla7ful
    @sevilla7ful 3 года назад +4

    Thank you for this

  • @shamselnahar45
    @shamselnahar45 2 года назад +2

    My understanding of the verse 59 surah 33, is Allah wanting Muslim women to be "recognised" and covering the chest does not provide any real distinction from non Muslim women. I actually found much deeper meaning to the hijab order after I moved to live in the west. I find it really empowering that I am able to show my identity and to easily spot other Muslim women, so that we can make a community. It gives me sense of pride and responsibility for displaying the best of manners. Moreover, it provides me with an unseen boundary that no man can cross.

    • @tisko7188
      @tisko7188 2 года назад

      At that time women who are non muslims doesn't covered their cheat, they exposed their chest, so allah commanded to cover it,

    • @shamselnahar45
      @shamselnahar45 2 года назад +2

      @@tisko7188 yes, however by then all women were covering their heads. So, including the chest would have made Muslim women recognizable. Hence, if you apply the same principle today, you would be able to conclude that the devine order include covering the head and dressing modestly.

    • @tisko7188
      @tisko7188 2 года назад +1

      @@shamselnahar45 please listen to next part also and also listen to Javed Ahmed ghamidi, there are difference of opinion among the scholars, and do you know why God said to draw their jilbab so they can be recognisable, it's to recognise as free women and not slave, if you look at that time there were scoundrels at madina who would assault free women and they would say that they thought she was a slave, that why allah ordered free women to draw their jilbaab .

    • @aisham.6678
      @aisham.6678 2 года назад +2

      @@tisko7188 does that then mean Allah did not have a problem with non-free women being harrased? This explanation is not reasonable and leans towards victim blaming. "If you dont wear a specific type of clothing expect to be harrased or molested".
      I would assume that Allah has a problem with the molestation of all women regardless of their social status. The problem is the molestor.

    • @tisko7188
      @tisko7188 2 года назад +1

      @@aisham.6678 You need to lesrn the actual context. When this verse was revealed muslims did not have all the power so the muslim women were molested. Please use some common sense, god is not victim blaming, god is saying a solution for the existing problem which the women faced at that time. Molesters are the problem but most of the molesters were non muslims and they didnt obey the words of god and at that time muslims didnt completly ruled the place so god said this safety measure yo women. Actually you need to get some more idea about the social context, its 1400 and not 2021

  • @roadlesstaken6006
    @roadlesstaken6006 3 года назад

    I watched mufti menk