Charles Murray: Right questions and wrong answers | LIVE STREAM
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 11 сен 2024
- On January 8, Charles Murray will celebrate his 75th birthday and retire as the W. H. Brady Scholar, shifting to an emeritus role at AEI. In his lecture, Dr. Murray will reflect on his inner dialogue from Thai villages in the 1960s through landmark books such as “Losing Ground” (Basic Books, 1984), “The Bell Curve” (Free Press, 1994), and “Coming Apart” (Crown Forum, 2012) - and on how his values have shaped the questions he asked and how the answers he found have shaped his values.
Please join AEI for a uniquely personal perspective on Charles Murray’s career as seen from the inside.
Subscribe to AEI's RUclips Channel
www.youtube.co...
Like us on Facebook
/ aeionline
Follow us on Twitter
/ aei
For more information
www.aei.org
Third-party photos, graphics, and video clips in this video may have been cropped or reframed. Music in this video may have been recut from its original arrangement and timing.
In the event this video uses Creative Commons assets: If not noted in the description, titles for Creative Commons assets used in this video can be found at the link provided after each asset.
The use of third-party photos, graphics, video clips, and/or music in this video does not constitute an endorsement from the artists and producers licensing those materials.
AEI operates independently of any political party and does not take institutional positions on any issues. AEI scholars, fellows, and their guests frequently take positions on policy and other issues. When they do, they speak for themselves and not for AEI or its trustees or other scholars or employees.
More information on AEI research integrity can be found here: www.aei.org/about/
#aei #news #politics #government #education #livestream #live #opinion #charlesmurray #libertarian #libertarianism #science #socialscience #speech
Murray is decent, brilliant and cares deeply about America
Thank you Mr. Murray.
class act...hard to believe he's violently protested.
Min 27:30
Happiness: lasting and justified satisfaction with life as a whole.
At 59:10, the reference to the "Remnant" is to the Bible, specifically to Isaiah 10 & 11. Nock's article is expressly based on this Biblical source, being titled "Isaiah's Job."
High IQ people often suffer from depression.
So do people with high expectations force onto them. Oh! Wait that's due to their environment. SILLY ME. I guess high IQ is debatable.
47:30 "... Terminal state of institutional schlorosis"
*sclerosis
Meta-studies show heritability follows averages of all other heritability of traits ranging from a low estimate of 40% to a high of 80%. Take the average call it around 60%.
Define: "Meta-studies", please.
Robert Jones Are you serious? Meta-studies are review studies, usually of all major relevant peer reviewed journal articles on a specific subject. IQ is one of the most studied and most reliable psychometric measures and is thus considered by psychologists to be highly reliable.
Yeah I'm fucking serious. Meta can mean anything, anybody wants it to mean in this realm of philosophy. We're talking about philosophy of mind here, with respect to cognitive dissonance, via these social bubbles. Sensation & Perception and the false sense that everyone's world must be similar to only what you experience.
Meta is a bullshit word, like spiritualism, if its range cannot be defined, and or quantified. It means whatever... pre-abstract. Thus the term needs to be simplified and differentiated from other similar, but more appropriate words.
Regardless, it's a bullshit term. So when people use bullshit terms, I ask them to define them... so as to steer clear any righteous claims or political rhetoric.
Let's not act like defining terms is an issue. If you've got problems with people asking what you mean, then you don't belong in this discussion. So take your pretentious bullshit and try to shove it back up your ass.
IQ began as a eugenics movement... Professionals can't even define intelligence... But I'm just supposed to take your word for it because... "most people don't ask me to define words". Too bad, I'm not most people. That's an appeal to numbers, possibly an appeal to authority, and an appeal to antiquity. A 3-in-1 fallacy... But you know better, right?
I'm a scientist and I care about intellectual honesty. I care about objective data. I care about the truth. I will never know the full truth, but I can work towards it.
As a political psychologist in computational research... I can't say I'm convinced IQ or even intelligence, exists.
-----
Peer Review: As if peer review actually knows what's it's talking about. Remember... They're full of over-privileged know-it-alls, that have been regurgitating the same shit for the past 60 years, with no end in sight, yet... Their theory fails, today. Peer review is corrupt, and just another wing of the elite.
By the way, my IQ is 72.
Robert Jones Remind me to never annoy or agitate Robert Jones. Yikes......
Ry Guy lol, poor fella was triggered
UBI makes me a little uneasy. How about a UBI that is a multiplier on what is earned, with the typical graduations/brackets associated w income? Better to have people work and try to improve themselves, rather than calculate that UBI alone is sufficient and watch TV.
In fact, self reporting and the existing UBI experiments do not confirm this perspective. 84% of people engage in work if they are guaranteed a minimum basic income. over 90% of people think other people will just be lazy. In essence, people are not lazy, they just think other people are. This is a non-controversial result and has been repeated in Finnland, Canada and New Zealand.
@@GingerDrums 2 years later, i am no longer open minded about UBI. It's a socialist scam, and people can have my money for free w no conditions. A little thing called inflation makes ubi a simple wealth transfer for hard working people to bums.
"The Government has an endless array of favors to sell to the private sector." How many favors has the AEI bought?
I want to know 1st, how many of the 25% upper class is Jewish
Why?
Murray's ideal of character is arbitrary as it is "convenient", the Goldberg types would have cried against fighting a king over taxes, it wouldn't be civilized they would say, they would make every excuse possible to lose the day.