@@tracydaye6059 He can give the rest of the lease to his daughters if he dies before the 75 years is up but I doubt either daughter will want the upkeep of it.
True. The leasehold, however, may be assigned to his widow, or to Eugenie and Beatrice. If Andrew terminates the lease, the property reverts to the Crown Estate.
Prince Andrew does have a lease with the Crown Estate but I think it is a requirement of the lease that the property is maintained. If he cannot maintain the property that will put his lease in jeopardy.
Fergie makes me sick...who knew she's been on her back freeloading when she's got her own place from her own money from book sales and all. Don't hear her trying to convince Andrew to move to Frogmore. THOSE TWO ARE THE SAME. She really is a pig.
Really? Didn't he put his life on the line to defend you in a war? I don't think he did anything that most wouldn't do given the opportunity - chase after and consort with willing women.
Why can't Andrew work, why should others give hime money, a home. He's a loser really. If a family member, normal family, never worked, had own home, tucked off others he would be called a loser.
A thing to remember is that Andrew had a protective detail. Everything he did, everyone he saw would have been known and documented. While he may not have been convicted, the family know exactly what he did, down to the last detail. And they chose to pay to make it go away rather than take it court.
His source is all those shady people internationally that he made sweetheart deals for when he was a “trade” ambassador. The short answer…he is grifting off the lowest of the low life
If Andrew is in breach of the lease agreement then he needs to move to a property more commensurate with his ability to pay. He has been and will be continually compromised.
This is ridiculous if you sign a lease and the Owner dies (Queen) then that lease is no longer valid as the prooerty is passed over to the new owner King Charles, he has the right to evict him for repairs as he inheritated the property from his mother. Andrew like Hazbeen is a bully and conceited full of his own importance he should be banished from any Royal Residence because of his disgraceful behaviour. He cannot pass the property to his daughters he Rents does not Own. Just evict him change the locks. Let him live on his fathers farm plenty of space. He is an arrogant spoilt nobody does not work for the Royal so cut him loose.
Exactly no parent tells another person, he/she is my favourite. People just assume, like Harry was the favourite g child , or Peter Philips is the favourite.
Harry obviously thought he was her favourite grandchild, just because u entertain her makes u hervfavourute who heard the Queen say it. No mother would want her children to know that. Likes different things in them, AS they r all different.
@@EileenRae-f6x the thrashbloids have convinced u sheeple that a member of the rf as in liz son has no right to stay on palace property furthermore they've convinced u to believe that he is disrespectful to some random adulteress because he stands his grounds to stay in property which was given to him by his mother.
A millionairess has said Andrew owes her millions He pleaded poverty to get out of repaying all of a debt to her and suddenly comes out with having millions. Typical rich boy. They never want to pay for anything. He's a TOAD
@redemptivepete Well actually the husband of Eugenie is just a regular guy who has made a success of his business career but Beatrice did marry a childhood friend from the Italian aristocracy.
He should do what the King requests. His behavior was abhorrent. It is called appearance of impropriety. He is a spoiled brat and beggars cannot be choosers.
For goodness sake Andrew get a Job!! And pay for your own bills. Strange that the Queen didn't set something up for him. She just left the mess for Charles to deal with.
Whether Prince Andrew is guilty or not has never been proven. I find it outrageous that people prefer to assume the accusations of a professional (censored) are true simply because he's a royal.
I don’t think the key allegation was ‘oh, Andrew is a pedophile’. I think the key point was his association with a convicted pedophile. And there is plenty of evidence (including Andrew’s own words on Newsnight) which shows that he happily associated with Epstein. It’s that ‘happy’ association that is unacceptable for a royal. Royalty is all about image. And he has tarnished that.
All the more since the prime witness has since withdrawn her speculative accusations about another of her acquaintancies. Prínce Andrew requested trial by open court, what he got was trial by Maitliss, which is not equitable. I have no opinion about the man. I do remember his heroism in the Falklands war, and dislike a person being destroyed for life without a fair hearing.
- Everything has become more expensive, and King Charles III. thinking of letting the Royal Lodge for £8 million a year, good idea... at the same time the cost of protecting Prince Andrew increased... the Royal Lodge is falling into disrepair and Prince Andrew is not providing the necessary renovations... so there is no point in Prince Andrew being offended.
@@simayaturner6648 Any opportunity to call out Harry, the ex-royal whinging weenie, and Meghan, Duchess of Let Them Eat Cake, is an opportunity well spent.
The only one that takes. The good side. Of the queen. And prince. Phillip. Is. Princess Ann. She is. Brilliant. She calls a. Spade a spade. Just like her father. Then has the love of the monarchy. Like her mother she should have been. Queen. It’s a pity. Thst was not allowe d.
Andrew is a disgrace and should never represent the royal family again. His behaviour brought a lot of shame onto the family and he doesn’t seem to regret what he did.
Thank you- zero has been proven- PA may have a terrible public persona, though IMO only, I think he’s being attacked for clicks & to take the pressure off H (now that the King wants to pave a way back for him).
@@rileyperkins2724However, he socialised with known Peadophiles! Not acceptable behaviour for a Prince of the realm. He was friends & mixed with Epstein, Maxwell, John Luc Brunel, Weinstein, Peter Nygard to name but a few! That in itself is not only really bad choices, but why would anyone choose to mix with peadophiles? And, so many of them!
ALL PRIVILEGE FAMILIES HAVE A ANDREW AND A HARRY. THEY ARE ALWAYS GETTING INTO ONE MESS AFTER ANOTHER. KEEP THEM OUT OF THE WAY. PAY THEM AN ALLOWANCE TO GET LOST FOREVER.
It was Beatrice's idea for Andrew to do that awful interview...I dont think his daughters are the brightest. And Fergie...the original grifter does him no favours. I dont see him as being the major problem. Harry on the other hand...he's still putting out bs and trying to shade the Monarchy while using all its privilege.
Andrew knew before his mom past away that his brother was not going to pay his way. He had 3-4 years to figure out how to make a income for himself & did absolutely nothing. He was suppose to be doing regular repairs to the mansion he was living in or lose his lease. It has been over 5 years. If Andrew had just moved into a normal size cottage within their gaurded grounds. Then Charles would still be helping out.
All happening with Nasty Andrew now is going to happen to William with Harry once he's king, unless K. Charles puts a stop to demands made by both these obnoxious entitled grifters.
LOL "I haven't seen anything on that scale since the queen's funeral.." You're kidding, right? You're old enough to remember the funeral of Princess Diana smh
Prince Andrew has had a legal lease on Royal Lodge, with the Crown Estate, which owns it (not the monarch), since 2002. So long as he is not in breach of the terms of that lease, he cannot be evicted by KC3, and his late mother could not have evicted him either. Nor would she have attempted to, I am sure. Andrew has to live somewhere, whether or not he is a working royal, and there is no doubt that the late Queen did not view Royal Lodge as 'too grand' for her second son to live in as a bachelor, considering that her own mother lived there alone, as a widow, until her death. In fact, the Queen Mother also had Clarence House in London to live in, so Royal Lodge was effectively just her weekend country retreat. Princess Anne lives in Gatcombe Park with only her husband, which is not much smaller than Royal Lodge, and the Edinburghs' Bagshot Park is huge, dwarfing Royal Lodge, with only 4 people resident (or 2, considering Lady Louise is now at university and James is at boarding school).
I think I read that part of the lease agreement was that Prince Andrew was to properly maintain the property. He hasn't. Wouldn't this be grounds for terminating the lease?
Why does Fergie live with him if they’re divorced. She has her own property. Why can’t Andrew live in her mansion. They both must be an embarrassment for their daughters.
She’s (Fergie) had lived on the “Coattails” of the Monarchy for decades. She rents out her mansion for millions, while living in the 30 room castle with her ex. How convenient 😂
“The late Queen Elizabeth always had a soft spot for Andrew, who seems to have a way of persuading her to do what he wants. This time, a senior Insider told me, he had a treacherous request. “He (Andrew) tried to persuade the Queen to block Prince Charles from marrying Camilla by being quite poisonous, mean, unhelpful, and very nasty about Camilla”. His claims included that she was insufficiently aristocratic and that she was not to be trusted.” From "Camilla: From Outcast to Queen Consort", Angela Levin: They were dark and strange times when paranoia became reality and this was a worry. Andrew lobbied very hard with the hope that Charles would not become king when his mother died, and that William would wear the crown. Andrew’s behavior was very, very negative and extremely unpleasant to the Queen, who disagreed. I was told it was one of the rare occasions he didn’t get his way. Nonetheless, he was apparently very angry he couldn’t run the country in some way. He remained so hostile to Camilla’s emergence and acceptance that is doubtful it has ever been forgiven”. Harry and Andrew provide plenty of fodder for the anti-monarchists.
Harry didn't sleep with young women. Andrew he is pediphale. Harry did what his father did. Charles wrote a book Prince of Wales. Ad granted interview admitting on his cheating ways on national television. So let stop with hypocrites, BS ad double standard. Andrew he suppose to be in jail if the Queen didn't pay off the girl
The Sussexes have shown us how well the Royal family do their jobs, by showing us how not to do it. They have made the Royal family more popular by trying to bash them snd destroy them, so we have had to stand up for them. No own likes a bully.
This guy said re Andrew “You have been convicted of nothing ion courts, nothing has been proven” . That will be because of that small matter of him paying millions of pounds to an accuser he claims that he never met. From the guy who also claims he didnt sweat 😂
He did so because his mother told him to to avoid the stink of a court hearing during her Jubilee year. He wanted to challenge his accuser in court. A woman who since had to withdraw another speculative claim she made against another who was able to fight back. I have no idea if whether he's guilty or not. I do know that the destruction of a man's life on hearsay is wrong
Andrew and Harry: both spares and never needed. It has to be tough growing up knowing you're only there in case your older sibling dies, but you're not important enough to be in on all the details of the job everyone hopes you'll never be doing. It's a psychological nightmare of a position to be forced to maintain your entire life, not to mention emotionally crippling. You're needed maybe but never wanted for yourself. And do not take this as an excuse for bad behavior. There are always better choices to be made. I'm speaking strictly about the circumstances that forced the personality growth in one direction or another. Before anybody decides who is evil in these circumstances, ask your own self: what choices would *I* have made? and how do I *know?*
Not a fan of Andrew's but a lease is a lease. The next time you start spouting about how desperate Harry is to return to the royal family remember this conversation. There is nothing there for the spare except to be the fall guy.
I personally find it rather disgusting that it appears people refuse to take the word of a prince whereas they happily seem to believe the accusations of a professional s!ut.
Do people really care about the affairs of the British Royals? If this really the most important issue in British society, perhaps more concern over poverty and the health crisis should given priority. Guess what the world did not stop when the Queen died and many could not care less about the coronation palava.
@@armchairguru1921 Yes, I think he would. How this actually works out I'm not sure, but I always got the impression that the recipient - heir should and would distribute what could be distributed, but I also believe the majority of the inheritance is actually property and 'fixed assets' so not a lot of liquidity. And the family do have access to the private estates of Sandringham and Balmoral, albeit at the Monarch's agreement.
Why do you keep talking about andrew its the kings problem if it was me i would just let the building fall down. Are you so short of news it's a private matter between the king and his brother
He and the archbishop need to learn to survive on zero hours contracts paid at minimum wage in tshirt printing factories and domestic service in the BnBs and entertainment establishmentsfrequented by their associates, whilst at the same time living in and managing their own slummy, overpriced accomodation with the aid of the benefit system alone
Andrew is so dumb. If he would be cooperative with the King he would probably get some sympathy within the family and perhaps gain a little respect from the public for simply being agreeable.
Sorry, but I find the phrase "Working Royal" hilarious. "Ongoing Genetic Inbreeding Experiment" would be more accurate. One Hell of a paper potentially to be written, there.
Andrew has a 75 year lease with the Crown Estate. He cannot be evicted by Charles. As long as Andrew meets the terms of the lease, to the satisfaction of the Crown Estate, he cannot be evicted. Why are people still talking about this? Charles does not own Windsor - it is owned by the British taxpayers and operated by the Crown Estate for the use of the royal family.
Tax payers only own it by an arrangement by KingGeorge V. When King Charles swore in he was asked if he gave up his properties if we owned it why ask him? Might mean, we only own whikst he is King?.
Geneviève, Il faut: - cesser d’écrire en majuscule, c’est l’équivalent de hurler plutôt que de parler (minuscules) - prendre vos médicaments car vous semblez être dérangée Cordialement
£1Million per year pocket money for doing nothing !
Not a bad job
A million identical a lot these days, many people get paid many millions for doing not a lot.
DEMANDEZ LE A WILLY ET KAKATE
Makes the British tax payer look very generous.
yah the late queen knowing she had bone cancer thought i will deal with it another year. seriously you people
Leech! Another Mummy’s boy! Why was the Queen so careless as a Mother? They are not what they appear to be!
Reporting on Family bickering when there is more going on the country to worry about
He cant hand it to his daughters ITS NOT HIS to give
Isnt it a crown estate????
@@tracydaye6059 He can give the rest of the lease to his daughters if he dies before the 75 years is up but I doubt either daughter will want the upkeep of it.
@@janetblack4215 Only if it is stated in the lease. But I doubt either one would want it.
True. The leasehold, however, may be assigned to his widow, or to Eugenie and Beatrice. If Andrew terminates the lease, the property reverts to the Crown Estate.
CECI EST VRAI POUR TOUS LE SEUL QUI A SA MAISON A LUI C'EST HARRY
@genevievetaulier2892 and even that is questionable
Don't want him back as a working royal. His daughters seem to have achieved good lives of their own. No need to worry about them.
Prince Andrew does have a lease with the Crown Estate but I think it is a requirement of the lease that the property is maintained. If he cannot maintain the property that will put his lease in jeopardy.
And if he can, he entitled to keep his lease.
Andrew should be open about who is paying for Royal Lodge. Highly unlikely it is coming from him or Fergie, the royal grifters.
His real estate son in law edoardo
Does that make Fergie and Andrew the real ‘O. G.’ ?
I guess PH and OM even come in 2nd place as Royal grifters?
Fergie makes me sick...who knew she's been on her back freeloading when she's got her own place from her own money from book sales and all. Don't hear her trying to convince Andrew to move to Frogmore. THOSE TWO ARE THE SAME. She really is a pig.
@@inahandbasket288as usual you can’t write without Harry Meghan!
Andrew makes me sick. He is disgraceful.
Really? Didn't he put his life on the line to defend you in a war? I don't think he did anything that most wouldn't do given the opportunity - chase after and consort with willing women.
Il a fait comme les autres, mais lui c'est fait prendre, c'est tout. Il en sait beaucoup sur tous c'est pourquoi il est toujours là.
Why can't Andrew work, why should others give hime money, a home. He's a loser really. If a family member, normal family, never worked, had own home, tucked off others he would be called a loser.
A thing to remember is that Andrew had a protective detail. Everything he did, everyone he saw would have been known and documented. While he may not have been convicted, the family know exactly what he did, down to the last detail. And they chose to pay to make it go away rather than take it court.
Innocent people don't pay out millions.
@@clydewilson5907Didn't they pay off rather than have a court case when our Queen was dying. I think that was the reason - regardless or not of guilt
Innocent people do pay out millions if a scandalous and prejudicial court trial coincides with their mother's Jubilee.
@@kmm62627 That's how it's done. The rich pay off and claim to be innocent. Don't buy the Poor Queen excuse.
They did pay as they thought there would by extension do damage to the monarchy. They like being where they are and quash any threat.
I feel confident that as soon as William is King that lease will go quickly away.
I don5 understand. Why he refuses. To move. Into. Frogmore. The lodge is far too big forvthe onevman
He bought a 75 year lease on that property; that's why,
Andrew needs to write his Memoir. "My life, high on the seas" make his own $$$
He is desperate to hang on to the title and prestige.
VOUS PARLER DE QUI DE CHARLOT OU DES WILLY ?
POUR CES DEUX INCAPABLE NOTOIRE CA MARCHE
@@genevievetaulier2892
At least they didn't take part in Jeffrey Epstein escapades like
Randy Andy..😉
His source is all those shady people internationally that he made sweetheart deals for when he was a “trade” ambassador. The short answer…he is grifting off the lowest of the low life
His behavior ,irrespective of his Luck 🍀 of birth, was not only disrespectful to his family , but also to his Country ,🙈🇬🇧
And to the young women he disrespected his entire life ..
he was never taught accountability. He has no self respect - how can he respect anyone else.
If Andrew is in breach of the lease agreement then he needs to move to a property more commensurate with his ability to pay. He has been and will be continually compromised.
This is ridiculous if you sign a lease and the Owner dies (Queen) then that lease is no longer valid as the prooerty is passed over to the new owner King Charles, he has the right to evict him for repairs as he inheritated the property from his mother. Andrew like Hazbeen is a bully and conceited full of his own importance he should be banished from any Royal Residence because of his disgraceful behaviour. He cannot pass the property to his daughters he Rents does not Own.
Just evict him change the locks.
Let him live on his fathers farm plenty of space. He is an arrogant spoilt nobody does not work for the Royal so cut him loose.
That is a Crown property and the Queen nor King Charles has ownership.
Why do you all keep saying about the Queen's favourite son ? Who of us who have children would want to be known as having a favourite child . !!
Exactly no parent tells another person, he/she is my favourite. People just assume, like Harry was the favourite g child , or Peter Philips is the favourite.
Harry obviously thought he was her favourite grandchild, just because u entertain her makes u hervfavourute who heard the Queen say it. No mother would want her children to know that. Likes different things in them, AS they r all different.
No responsible parent should need to have a "favourite". Not very good judgement going on somewhere.
@@alanbradley9621all Henry’s delusion. He thought a lot of himself IMO.
The
House is in despair . Andrew needs to removed . King Charles is the right. Andrew is arrogant and is disrespectful.
How? His mother gave it to him and now his brother's concubine wants it. So he says NO. its cowmilla the disrespectful one here.
@@ekanem3116oh dont be so ignorant and daft 🙄🙄
@@ekanem3116 he cant afford the upkeep of it he is a disgrace and expects the tax payer to foot the bill
How this is a crow property and it is not for Camille ,have some respect 🇨🇦
@@EileenRae-f6x the thrashbloids have convinced u sheeple that a member of the rf as in liz son has no right to stay on palace property furthermore they've convinced u to believe that he is disrespectful to some random adulteress because he stands his grounds to stay in property which was given to him by his mother.
But the Teddy Bears have gotten used to the place .
A millionairess has said Andrew owes her millions He pleaded poverty to get out of repaying all of a debt to her and suddenly comes out with having millions. Typical rich boy. They never want to pay for anything. He's a TOAD
……same as his useless nephew………
Please don't talk over each other.
He could afford to pay a woman he had never met £10 million so surely Andrew can afford the upkeep on his house
I think his Mother Queen Elizabeth found the money paid to Virginia but he is fortunate to have sons in law who are wealthy .
@@annewalden3795 "Fortunate" ....... who else were his daughters gonna mix with? 😂😂😂
@redemptivepete Well actually the husband of Eugenie is just a regular guy who has made a success of his business career but Beatrice did marry a childhood friend from the Italian aristocracy.
The Queen did .... she paid it
It was £12 M. His mummy paid it. She also paid the French woman off that he owed £5 M for the ski lodge to
He should do what the King requests. His behavior was abhorrent. It is called appearance of impropriety. He is a spoiled brat and beggars cannot be choosers.
He hasn't got his mother to bail him out now!
The daughters are super wealthy they certainly don’t need any more money than they already have!
For goodness sake Andrew get a Job!! And pay for your own bills.
Strange that the Queen didn't set something up for him. She just left the mess for Charles to deal with.
Whether Prince Andrew is guilty or not has never been proven. I find it outrageous that people prefer to assume the accusations of a professional (censored) are true simply because he's a royal.
I don’t think the key allegation was ‘oh, Andrew is a pedophile’. I think the key point was his association with a convicted pedophile. And there is plenty of evidence (including Andrew’s own words on Newsnight) which shows that he happily associated with Epstein.
It’s that ‘happy’ association that is unacceptable for a royal. Royalty is all about image. And he has tarnished that.
All the more since the prime witness has since withdrawn her speculative accusations about another of her acquaintancies. Prínce Andrew requested trial by open court, what he got was trial by Maitliss, which is not equitable. I have no opinion about the man. I do remember his heroism in the Falklands war, and dislike a person being destroyed for life without a fair hearing.
A professional (censored) who has since tried and been forced to withdraw a similar speculative accusation against another of her acquaintancies.
@@HelenAlison-b7t Yep. And don't forget the infamous 'lost' photograph.
- Everything has become more expensive, and King Charles III. thinking of letting the Royal Lodge for £8 million a year, good idea... at the same time the cost of protecting Prince Andrew increased... the Royal Lodge is falling into disrepair and Prince Andrew is not providing the necessary renovations... so there is no point in Prince Andrew being offended.
VOUS COMME LECHE VOUS ETES CHAMPIONNE
Oprah was what made me have zero respect for the Sussex's, I can't stand them since that moment.
This is about the pervert. Not the Sussex’s…great deflection though.
@@simayaturner6648 Any opportunity to call out Harry, the ex-royal whinging weenie, and Meghan, Duchess of Let Them Eat Cake, is an opportunity well spent.
@@simayaturner6648
Meghan was a Yacht Girl on Epstein's Yacht, prior to meeting Harry, so she obviously met Andrew before Harry...
@@simayaturner6648always!
Andrew should live on a pension as he is a senior now, right?
He served in the Navy long enough to earn a pension as well.
The only one that takes. The good side. Of the queen. And prince. Phillip. Is. Princess Ann. She is. Brilliant. She calls a. Spade a spade. Just like her father. Then has the love of the monarchy. Like her mother she should have been. Queen. It’s a pity. Thst was not allowe d.
Entitlement invites temptations. It is good to be normal. Less headaches.
The boy Andrew is a wast of space
He allegedly has been taking backhanders for years as a trade envoy! For favours , so someone has given him money to pays bills!
Andrew is a disgrace and should never represent the royal family again. His behaviour brought a lot of shame onto the family and he doesn’t seem to regret what he did.
In other cultures his behaviour wittiest bring si much shame he would be ousted at the least! He is a waste of space.
He doesn’t represent the RF anymore. What exactly are you arguing for???
Ah, the thing of it is, we don't know what he did; there has been no proof offered, and nothing proven against him.
Thank you- zero has been proven- PA may have a terrible public persona, though IMO only, I think he’s being attacked for clicks & to take the pressure off H (now that the King wants to pave a way back for him).
@@rileyperkins2724However, he socialised with known Peadophiles! Not acceptable behaviour for a Prince of the realm. He was friends & mixed with Epstein, Maxwell, John Luc Brunel, Weinstein, Peter Nygard to name but a few! That in itself is not only really bad choices, but why would anyone choose to mix with peadophiles? And, so many of them!
Mummy isn’t here anymore to protect Andy.
Charles should be tough on Harry
yes
Andrew as a non working royal is not entitled to an allowance. His mother had made an exception for Andrew.
The allowance is from their personal accounts not the crown purse.
@Hava744 She didn't give the other children or grandchildren allowances. She babied Andrew. He should have got a job.
He did fight in the Falklands
@@janetblack4215Tesco is hiring.
ALL PRIVILEGE FAMILIES HAVE A ANDREW AND A HARRY. THEY ARE ALWAYS GETTING INTO ONE MESS AFTER ANOTHER. KEEP THEM OUT OF THE WAY. PAY THEM AN ALLOWANCE TO GET LOST FOREVER.
So fully agree with you. I feel exhausted with this carry on. Please GO.
It was Beatrice's idea for Andrew to do that awful interview...I dont think his daughters are the brightest. And Fergie...the original grifter does him no favours. I dont see him as being the major problem. Harry on the other hand...he's still putting out bs and trying to shade the Monarchy while using all its privilege.
Oprah stroking the race card. Diddy much?
Andrew knew before his mom past away that his brother was not going to pay his way. He had 3-4 years to figure out how to make a income for himself & did absolutely nothing. He was suppose to be doing regular repairs to the mansion he was living in or lose his lease. It has been over 5 years. If Andrew had just moved into a normal size cottage within their gaurded grounds. Then Charles would still be helping out.
All happening with Nasty Andrew now is going to happen to William with Harry once he's king, unless K. Charles puts a stop to demands made by both these obnoxious entitled grifters.
How is the taxpayer on the hook???? Would that not be public information?
Bad choice for a “favored son.”
Prince Andrew deserves at best a hovel, or a prison cell. And my favourite ‘Royal’ is Harry.
LOL "I haven't seen anything on that scale since the queen's funeral.." You're kidding, right? You're old enough to remember the funeral of Princess Diana smh
The Queen screwed up she's gonna shut off. Taking care of this and not left it for her family to have to clean up after Andrew..
Prince Andrew has had a legal lease on Royal Lodge, with the Crown Estate, which owns it (not the monarch), since 2002. So long as he is not in breach of the terms of that lease, he cannot be evicted by KC3, and his late mother could not have evicted him either. Nor would she have attempted to, I am sure. Andrew has to live somewhere, whether or not he is a working royal, and there is no doubt that the late Queen did not view Royal Lodge as 'too grand' for her second son to live in as a bachelor, considering that her own mother lived there alone, as a widow, until her death. In fact, the Queen Mother also had Clarence House in London to live in, so Royal Lodge was effectively just her weekend country retreat. Princess Anne lives in Gatcombe Park with only her husband, which is not much smaller than Royal Lodge, and the Edinburghs' Bagshot Park is huge, dwarfing Royal Lodge, with only 4 people resident (or 2, considering Lady Louise is now at university and James is at boarding school).
I think I read that part of the lease agreement was that Prince Andrew was to properly maintain the property. He hasn't. Wouldn't this be grounds for terminating the lease?
Bagshot park is amazing, I hope Edward has a long enough lease to pass it to his children or hopefully William will allow James to take a lease.
@@LeslieMacDonald-gg2kgHow do you know he hasn’t?
@@skhephner There are pictures all over the internet showing how the property has gone downhill.
Why does Fergie live with him if they’re divorced. She has her own property. Why can’t Andrew live in her mansion. They both must be an embarrassment for their daughters.
she rents her house out for a huge fee they deserve one another nobody wants them
She’s hanging on to his coattails for relevance.
She’s (Fergie) had lived on the “Coattails” of the Monarchy for decades. She rents out her mansion for millions, while living in the 30 room castle with her ex. How convenient 😂
Send him to Ukraine
Council flat, tower block, no security, but allow him 1 mil. a year. Could be interesting
Andrew is a smug disgrace, he still believes he should be respected as he is a royal!!! You must be joking 😡
I think he must be mates with Lord Ally. That would explain the lot. 🤣🤣🤣
Was it really necessary to mention the traitor Harry?!!!
What treason did he actually commit? Do you even know what treason is?
Andrew the royal couch potato
It’s funny how their favourite royals are non royal origins.
I don't feel anything for him and his family .
Why look somber when nothing has been proven against him? Let him enjoy life! I loved seeing him and Fergie as joyful as in the good old days.
the term " working Royal " is pathetic, all it entails is chatting and cutting ribbons and this is "working!"
“The late Queen Elizabeth always had a soft spot for Andrew, who seems to have a way of persuading her to do what he wants. This time, a senior Insider told me, he had a treacherous request. “He (Andrew) tried to persuade the Queen to block Prince Charles from marrying Camilla by being quite poisonous, mean, unhelpful, and very nasty about Camilla”. His claims included that she was insufficiently aristocratic and that she was not to be trusted.”
From "Camilla: From Outcast to Queen Consort", Angela Levin: They were dark and strange times when paranoia became reality and this was a worry. Andrew lobbied very hard with the hope that Charles would not become king when his mother died, and that William would wear the crown.
Andrew’s behavior was very, very negative and extremely unpleasant to the Queen, who disagreed. I was told it was one of the rare occasions he didn’t get his way. Nonetheless, he was apparently very angry he couldn’t run the country in some way. He remained so hostile to Camilla’s emergence and acceptance that is doubtful it has ever been forgiven”.
Harry and Andrew provide plenty of fodder for the anti-monarchists.
Harry didn't sleep with young women. Andrew he is pediphale. Harry did what his father did. Charles wrote a book Prince of Wales. Ad granted interview admitting on his cheating ways on national television. So let stop with hypocrites, BS ad double standard. Andrew he suppose to be in jail if the Queen didn't pay off the girl
The Sussexes have shown us how well the Royal family do their jobs, by showing us how not to do it. They have made the Royal family more popular by trying to bash them snd destroy them, so we have had to stand up for them. No own likes a bully.
Well that is one thing I agree with Andrew. Camilla should have remained an outcast! She brought as much shame as Andrew to the Royals!
I won’t watch anything that Chris Ship is on because he is team Sussexx and anti-Royal
The BRF need to go.
BLATENT HYPOCRISY - STOP THE WITCH HUNT AGAINST ANDREW
This guy said re Andrew “You have been convicted of nothing ion courts, nothing has been proven” . That will be because of that small matter of him paying millions of pounds to an accuser he claims that he never met. From the guy who also claims he didnt sweat 😂
He did so because his mother told him to to avoid the stink of a court hearing during her Jubilee year. He wanted to challenge his accuser in court. A woman who since had to withdraw another speculative claim she made against another who was able to fight back. I have no idea if whether he's guilty or not. I do know that the destruction of a man's life on hearsay is wrong
What about re-housing him in the Tower of London.
How about with epstein
Andrew and Harry: both spares and never needed. It has to be tough growing up knowing you're only there in case your older sibling dies, but you're not important enough to be in on all the details of the job everyone hopes you'll never be doing. It's a psychological nightmare of a position to be forced to maintain your entire life, not to mention emotionally crippling. You're needed maybe but never wanted for yourself.
And do not take this as an excuse for bad behavior. There are always better choices to be made. I'm speaking strictly about the circumstances that forced the personality growth in one direction or another. Before anybody decides who is evil in these circumstances, ask your own self: what choices would *I* have made? and how do I *know?*
Not a fan of Andrew's but a lease is a lease. The next time you start spouting about how desperate Harry is to return to the royal family remember this conversation. There is nothing there for the spare except to be the fall guy.
1000% agree!
A lease contingent upon Andrew’s ability to finance the ongoing maintenance and repairs of Royal Lodge.
@@judith3218We understand- and if he does maintain it will you still be upset?
Andrew Fergie and the daughters cannot be trusted. Let them look after
Daddy Fergie bought a house a year ago let them live there.
I personally find it rather disgusting that it appears people refuse to take the word of a prince whereas they happily seem to believe the accusations of a professional s!ut.
What a load of rubbish.
Some other two more urgently need removal. King has favourites not acting in best interests of his Country and def am not a fan of Andrew.
Exactly but he should be more concerned w “H” imo.
Do people really care about the affairs of the British Royals? If this really the most important issue in British society, perhaps more concern over poverty and the health crisis should given priority. Guess what the world did not stop when the Queen died and many could not care less about the coronation palava.
I don't understand that Andy Airmiles can transfer a lease to his daughters as he doesn't OWN the property
He will get all that by my money
Prince Andrew has a valid lease. Why should he leave??? Because is brother says so
looks like his lease is up in 2078
Grinning like a cheshire cat with his beady eyes
So... Still waiting for the answer to why he's clinging on to Royal Lodge. The Sun resorting to clickbait here?
The Royals have more than enough properties.
Andrew is not as bad was Prince Harry the liar
They all own too much. One can only live in one place at a time. Bunch of low life's. Let's get rid of this ludicrous institution.
Could you please explain why Andrew wouldn't have inherited some money from his mother?
It is agreed that the Monarch leaves their entire estate to the next Monarch, and thereby does not pay inheritance tax.
@@crazyplantlady7985 Would Charles not be honour-bound to share some of his mother's private assets with his siblings?
@@armchairguru1921 Yes, I think he would. How this actually works out I'm not sure, but I always got the impression that the recipient - heir should and would distribute what could be distributed, but I also believe the majority of the inheritance is actually property and 'fixed assets' so not a lot of liquidity. And the family do have access to the private estates of Sandringham and Balmoral, albeit at the Monarch's agreement.
Andrew is just like Harry----a grifting spare out to create trouble. When is the king going to do something about Harry?
Why do you keep talking about andrew its the kings problem if it was me i would just let the building fall down. Are you so short of news it's a private matter between the king and his brother
The building is owned by the taxpayer via the Royal Estate, not the king. It's not a private matter when it's our property
A royal fraud and creep.
He and the archbishop need to learn to survive on zero hours contracts paid at minimum wage in tshirt printing factories and domestic service in the BnBs and entertainment establishmentsfrequented by their associates, whilst at the same time living in and managing their own slummy, overpriced accomodation with the aid of the benefit system alone
Camila is not royal.
And ?
Neither was the Previous Queen’s Mother, nor are the Princess of Wales, the Duchess of Edinburgh etc. So what?
Andrew is so dumb. If he would be cooperative with the King he would probably get some sympathy within the family and perhaps gain a little respect from the public for simply being agreeable.
Where is Matt?
He was away covering William and Earth Shot while this show as being taped.
Pathetic
1 mill a year. 😂 thats not enough? Hf greed much.
So what was the Real reason????
Whaaaat Camilla?? My goodness!
Refuse to move Andy, Frogmore is beneath you. It only has 7 bathrooms. Claim squatters rights if you have to.
Sorry, but I find the phrase "Working Royal" hilarious.
"Ongoing Genetic Inbreeding Experiment" would be more accurate. One Hell of a paper potentially to be written, there.
Harry is the only likable royal.
The British way .
Andrew has a 75 year lease with the Crown Estate. He cannot be evicted by Charles. As long as Andrew meets the terms of the lease, to the satisfaction of the Crown Estate, he cannot be evicted. Why are people still talking about this? Charles does not own Windsor - it is owned by the British taxpayers and operated by the Crown Estate for the use of the royal family.
Tax payers only own it by an arrangement by KingGeorge V. When King Charles swore in he was asked if he gave up his properties if we owned it why ask him? Might mean, we only own whikst he is King?.
ANDREW DOIT ECRIRESES MEMOIRES ET TOUS LES FAIRE TOMBER
Geneviève,
Il faut:
- cesser d’écrire en majuscule, c’est l’équivalent de hurler plutôt que de parler (minuscules)
- prendre vos médicaments car vous semblez être dérangée
Cordialement