He hasn't played an elite season in 2yrs, and its not like he had 5 of them before that. The seasons in 2020 & 2021 where in various bubble/hub conditions. And while he's shown he's very competent in front of goal, his field kicking has been patchy and for a mid that matters. And his moderate off-field challenges, along with an ACL add questions on return. The Bulldogs should have traded him last year when they still had the year of contract remaining as some leverage. But these are the trades that help Geelong stay at the top. His potential is probably a mid-first pick of a late first and second, but he has enough question marks on him currently that a first round pick could end up being overs.
Cry harder. Just because Geelong are more success than your joke of a club. Who do you go for BTW? Maybe you didn't say because you are too embarrassed to.
Sorry but Geelong don’t have a god given right to get what they want in deals every season. You’ve won most deals in the past and basically got a free pick 7 from Gold Coast last season because Bowes chose the Cats. The Dogs can hold out for what they think is fair. If Smith reaches his potential he’s much better than pick 17
@@jsequine927 It's not about "winning" deals. It is about getting the best for our club. Geelong have done nothing different to any other club. Your club bring in players from other clubs and try to do the best deal. We offered the Bulldogs a top 20 pick when they don't have one, in a superdraft, and yet the Bulldogs piss and moan about our success and the past. How is offering a pick which would give the Bulldogs an early pick in the draft a bad thing. We never refused to give them pick 17. It just isn't good enough for the greedy Bulldogs. Don't know what team you go for, but unless you are a Bulldogs supporter, it really doesn't have anything to do with you. So Go back to your own deals.
@@jsequine927 Oh poor Footscray. Victim mentality again. Just like your suburb. Oh boo hoo. Why are you commenting so much? Centrelink closed today? Geelong people make Ford cars. Footscray people steal them.
@@jsequine927 You play hard ball on Geelong, St. Kilda and North yet I see you are using the same arguments to Carlton about Matt Kennedy that you accuse us of using on you, you hypocrites. You are a dumb club. You have no pick before 35 in a strong draft, yet could get 17 from Geelong and 25 from North, and you turn it down. You need to rebuild before Tassie come in. You aren't playing these guys, so use them as currency while they still have value. You won't get better picks than this for these players going forward, when they are a year older. Now is the time to clean up in a super draft. Besides, according to the experts, pick 30 is almost as good as pick 1 this year, so pick 17 in this draft is as good as top ten pick. If Sam Power gets these deals done, he has done a good job. If he fails to trade these three, and weakens your draft hand, then it makes him as much of a dud as a list manager as he was as a player.
There’s huge differences, first is that Shai Bolton is contracted till the end of 2028 so Richmond can keep him and also a club looking to get him will have to offer what he’s worth as a minimum where as Bailey smith is out of contract so if a deal with Geelong doesn’t happen dogs will get nothing by sending him to the draft. 2nd is Shai Bolton hasn’t been injured like Smith has missing the entirety of 2024 season. Dogs don’t have a strong position here.
@@HitchyBruh Issue is bolten is rarely good in games and smith is every game. He's 23 and other clubs will want him too, if he goes to the draft geelong wont get him so no one wins. He is worth way more than just pick 17 lmao
@@Tosicc567 nah there’s actually a good chance Geelong will still pick him up through the draft, Smith has made it clear he wants to be at Geelong so clubs won’t be looking to grab a player that doesn’t want to be there, has had multiple injuries and the fact that the draft is extra promising this time around matters too. Also no one wins? I mean at worst Geelong keep their pick, Bulldogs get absolutely nothing. Would u rather a first rounder in a strong draft or nothing? Btw I wasn’t saying Geelong’s 1st pick was great for the dogs but I do think the 1st round pick and a future 2nd or 3rd round pick is fair and dogs would accept this. My point mainly came from Smith not being worth 2 first rounders like Richmond are being offered for Shai Bolton and dogs certainly won’t get that for Smith.
@@HitchyBruh I wasnt saying he was worth 2 first rounders either but lesser players are getting that atm. Pick 17 and a future second is about right, St Kilda could genuinely pick smith up in the draft. Its just a pointless risk for the cats to make and it kinda shows they didnt want him that bad they'd risk him in the draft
Facts are the Bulldogs Have Lost him so last minute they will take pick 17 and the Cats are the best in the league at trading. Players have to want to play for you as Melbourne will find out!
If I’m the Dogs I’m making him go to the draft and if another club says we will match his money then that forces the Cats to pay what he’s worth. Hey dogs remember Ollie Henry I wished the pies just made him walk to the draft instead of being paid way unders.
Oh boo hoo. You didn't play Ollie Henry in your regular 22. He was kept down in the VFL yet you wanted a top ten pick. Either play these players in your best team or lose them. Losers like Alex Johnson were getting games ahead of him. Collingwood are the last team to talk about loyalty, when you pushed Treloar and Grundy out of the club to get out of paying what you owed them. Collingwood can't be trusted to honor a contract. How much are you offering for Dan Houston? Top ten pick or you are lowballing Port. Also, I invite the Bulldogs to walk Smith to the ND. Do it! No other club will take a risk on a guy coming off an ACL, who hasn't played well the last few seasons, who they haven't spoken too and who hasn't done a medical, doesn't want to play for them and will request a trade one year in anyway, where they will get even less (since he is a year older), when they could use that pick on a promising kid in a super draft, just to stick it up Geelong. No, watch instead as teams pick kids, and when it comes to our pick, we choose Bailey Smith. Who knows, Geelong may even do a deal with another club draft night to get higher in the draft order, to draft him sooner. Your club more than most knows that. You got Luke Ball that way. It worked then, and it will work now. But I think Bulldogs will cave and just take 17. Better than nothing. The only way they get anything from the deal is to go through us.
More than money. Couple of problems with letting him walk to the draft. First of all, he gets to stipulate his conditions. This includes refusing to meet with any clubs or refusing to take a medical. This is problematic as he already has a fractured relationship with his current club, so clubs would want to meet with him to gauge his mindset before drafting him. They'd also want a medical for a bloke coming off an ACL - no club would deal with them issues. Secondly, if the Dogs walk him to the draft, they get nothing. They'll cut their nose of to spite their face. A first rounder, even if it's a late first, is better than nothing. Geelong simply hold the balance of power in this. If he gets walked to the draft he will end up Geelong anyway. If they deal in good faith, which is better for all parties involved, then Dogs will be forced to take whatever the Cats offer. End of the day, there will be a middle ground reached. It will be more than Geelong has on the table right now and less than the Dogs want.
@@ianscott424 The same thing happened to Nick Stevens who wanted to get to Collingwood and Port let him go to the draft and it didn’t stop Carlton from taking him and he remained there for the rest of his time in the game.
@@peternut358 But here is what Geelong can do. On trade night, we can do pick swaps with another team to get higher in the draft. Like offer Gold Coast lower picks to give them points and we get a pick higher than 17 off them, so we can get Smith even earlier. Wanting to put Smith in the draft shows that the Bulldogs are even stupider than they look.
@@peternut358 Why not just send him to the draft then? I dare your list manager to announce that they will no longer deal with us and won't accept anything we offer (as you are asking for a top ten pick, which we don't have, meaning you have no intention of trading) and just say that you will walk him to the draft. Put up or shut up. I bet you won't because you are too chickenshit to follow through. You talk a good game. You don't because you NEED Geelong, more than we need you. You have no top twenty pick in a super draft, and we have one to give. Get over your pride and accept the trade. So stop with your threats because of you were going to do it, you would have done it by now.
Because he has just had an ACL and he is out of contract (if Bulldogs had really wanted him and loved him that much, they would have offered him a $1 million a year 7 year contract to stay, instead of letting him fall out of contract). You wouldn't have played him in the midfield anymore anyway if he came back. Need to keep those midfield spots for no-names like Garcia, Gallagher and Sanders.
@@dhenderson1810 what the dogs would or wouldn’t do with him is irrelevant, it’s about what he’s worth to Geelong. Obviously doggies fan bias here, but he’s a way better player than some of the people touted to be traded for better picks, not to mention cases like Lachie Weller being traded for pick 2. Everything being discussed for Smith atm is way unders.
He's uncontracted, he's got a fractured relationship with the Dogs, has had personal issues and he's coming off an ACL. Is he worth more than 17? It would be easy to make an argument to say he is. Doesn't mean that the Dogs will get it. A player is only worth what someone is willing to pay for them.
Pick 17 (which will end up in the 20s after bids) for Baz is pathetic. Bolton, Baker and Rioli going for top 12 picks + extras is absurd in comparison. What are these journos smoking?
The key difference is that the tigers players are contracted. Meaning RIchmond can dictate the value or else they keep them. Smith is uncontracted so can leave for nothing. Dogs really don't have much leverage, not to mention the baggage that Bailey comes with (drugs, mental health) and a dodgy ACL
Baker for Pick 14 is not a better player than Smith... Neither is Rioli for Pick 6 and maybe more. Also a 29 year old Tom Barrass is "apparently" worth a first round pick and a 2nd. Smith is 6 years younger and has way more potential. The media just want us to roll over and accept a pick in the mid 20's, yet if it was the other way around they'd want us to stump up 3 first round picks... Geelong can offer up SDK or Dempsey and it's a fair deal.
Seriously, pick 17 for Bailey smith is sh1te. R1 plus a round 2 …… I’m sick of jay clarke and commentators come up with their biased opinions. How much do Geelong pay these guys.
Lmaooo, offer up SDK, fair deal? You’re out of your mind, dogs would need to give Bailey smith, a 1st round and 2nd round pick for Geelong to even consider that deal which they’d likely still deny. SDK is worth more than Smith and Geelong will look to keep him for the rest of his career just as Andrew Mackie said. Also only in your dreams Geelong would offer up Dempsey. Bailey Smith been meh the last 2 years with 0 games played last season, suffered 2 ACL tears in the left and then an ACL tear to his right knee. Pick 15-20 and potentially a future 2nd or 3rd round pick is quite fair, Bulldogs don’t have a lot of options as he’s out of contract, first round pick around 20 is better than letting him go to the draft where they’ll get nothing for him and Geelong would probably get him anyway. At best dogs would get 1st round pick and like a future 2nd round pick
@@keithwilson4966 SHite? Hasnt played for 2 yrs mate, & has numerous ongoing injuries, drug & mental issues. Get real. He may never play again at this rate. No, what will happen is that you will take whatever we offer & thank us for taking a huge risk off your hands. Or go to the draft & get NOTHING 4 him. 17 or nothing. No skin off our nose. 🤣
Sure, in the fantasy land where players don't have to consent to trades. Maybe WC could do the same with Barrass? Just trade him to the highest bidder?
He is out of contract and leaving. The dogs may have to take unders because of that fact. The cats do not have to (and won’t) pay overs like in your silly trade proposals . Having said that, he is worth slightly more than pick 17.
Comparing smith to baker is crazy😅
Comparing things to things is craaaaazzzzyyyyuu
Smith clears such a ridiculous comparison
agreed. take 17
He hasn't played an elite season in 2yrs, and its not like he had 5 of them before that. The seasons in 2020 & 2021 where in various bubble/hub conditions. And while he's shown he's very competent in front of goal, his field kicking has been patchy and for a mid that matters. And his moderate off-field challenges, along with an ACL add questions on return.
The Bulldogs should have traded him last year when they still had the year of contract remaining as some leverage.
But these are the trades that help Geelong stay at the top. His potential is probably a mid-first pick of a late first and second, but he has enough question marks on him currently that a first round pick could end up being overs.
Has there ever been a journalist shilling harder for his team than Jon Ralph? Richmond should put him on the payroll.
It's a bit much, isn't it?
Scott Gullan trying to say pick 17 is a good deal for the Dogs… and everyone should just kow tow to Geelong who trade stars in every season
@@jsequine927 I am pretty sure Gullan is a bulldogs supporter.
17 for Smith after pretending for 2 years that Esava was Buddy 2.0 with his market value. Did Mackie do an internship with Dodoro?
Well we did get Humphries and Mannagh soooooo........
Cry harder.
Just because Geelong are more success than your joke of a club.
Who do you go for BTW? Maybe you didn't say because you are too embarrassed to.
@@philsoutlook and the sky is blue but how’s that or what you said relevant to what I said?
@@mjhall41241 COPE 🎻
What's Bailey Smith worth? Let me dive in to a series of unfounded assumptions and attempt to pass this off as football trading expertise.
Well said.
And the irrelevant question: "Is it fair?"
Maybe we don't need daily updates on this complete nonentity of trade period.
Geelong is offering a first round pick.
17 is a first round pick.
It is a super draft this year.
Meaning 17 this year is better than most years.
Sorry but Geelong don’t have a god given right to get what they want in deals every season. You’ve won most deals in the past and basically got a free pick 7 from Gold Coast last season because Bowes chose the Cats. The Dogs can hold out for what they think is fair. If Smith reaches his potential he’s much better than pick 17
@@jsequine927 It's not about "winning" deals. It is about getting the best for our club.
Geelong have done nothing different to any other club. Your club bring in players from other clubs and try to do the best deal.
We offered the Bulldogs a top 20 pick when they don't have one, in a superdraft, and yet the Bulldogs piss and moan about our success and the past.
How is offering a pick which would give the Bulldogs an early pick in the draft a bad thing. We never refused to give them pick 17. It just isn't good enough for the greedy Bulldogs.
Don't know what team you go for, but unless you are a Bulldogs supporter, it really doesn't have anything to do with you. So Go back to your own deals.
@@jsequine927 Oh poor Footscray. Victim mentality again. Just like your suburb.
Oh boo hoo.
Why are you commenting so much? Centrelink closed today?
Geelong people make Ford cars. Footscray people steal them.
@@jsequine927
You play hard ball on Geelong, St. Kilda and North yet I see you are using the same arguments to Carlton about Matt Kennedy that you accuse us of using on you, you hypocrites.
You are a dumb club. You have no pick before 35 in a strong draft, yet could get 17 from Geelong and 25 from North, and you turn it down.
You need to rebuild before Tassie come in. You aren't playing these guys, so use them as currency while they still have value. You won't get better picks than this for these players going forward, when they are a year older. Now is the time to clean up in a super draft.
Besides, according to the experts, pick 30 is almost as good as pick 1 this year, so pick 17 in this draft is as good as top ten pick.
If Sam Power gets these deals done, he has done a good job. If he fails to trade these three, and weakens your draft hand, then it makes him as much of a dud as a list manager as he was as a player.
@@dhenderson1810 your so mad 🎻 😂😂😂😂 GEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLOOONNNNGGGGGGGG😘
Lol in the NFL if you do an ACL you won't even get a 5th round draft pick- it's a death sentence
I don’t know why teams even bother dealing with Geelong in trade week
Because your players would rather play for us than for you.
Maybe fix your own club up.
😂
@@dhenderson1810 maybe focus on not choking a 6 goal lead to play in a grand final
@@kokmuncher6702 Maybe focus on actually making a preliminary final.
@@dhenderson1810 I got for Brisbane 🤡🤡
This gullan bloke has no idea
He’s gotta go.
Hes some random bloke from the pub. Amateur hour
What most people are forgetting is his done an acl and his out of contract
Thanks for keeping us updated and is Hawthorn still going to try to get Smith ?
These guys really need a trade to talk about 😂
Freo want to pay 2 firsts for bolten and the cats are trying only pick 17... Are you kidding me lmao
There’s huge differences, first is that Shai Bolton is contracted till the end of 2028 so Richmond can keep him and also a club looking to get him will have to offer what he’s worth as a minimum where as Bailey smith is out of contract so if a deal with Geelong doesn’t happen dogs will get nothing by sending him to the draft. 2nd is Shai Bolton hasn’t been injured like Smith has missing the entirety of 2024 season. Dogs don’t have a strong position here.
@@HitchyBruh Issue is bolten is rarely good in games and smith is every game. He's 23 and other clubs will want him too, if he goes to the draft geelong wont get him so no one wins. He is worth way more than just pick 17 lmao
@@Tosicc567 nah there’s actually a good chance Geelong will still pick him up through the draft, Smith has made it clear he wants to be at Geelong so clubs won’t be looking to grab a player that doesn’t want to be there, has had multiple injuries and the fact that the draft is extra promising this time around matters too.
Also no one wins? I mean at worst Geelong keep their pick, Bulldogs get absolutely nothing. Would u rather a first rounder in a strong draft or nothing? Btw I wasn’t saying Geelong’s 1st pick was great for the dogs but I do think the 1st round pick and a future 2nd or 3rd round pick is fair and dogs would accept this. My point mainly came from Smith not being worth 2 first rounders like Richmond are being offered for Shai Bolton and dogs certainly won’t get that for Smith.
@@HitchyBruh I wasnt saying he was worth 2 first rounders either but lesser players are getting that atm. Pick 17 and a future second is about right, St Kilda could genuinely pick smith up in the draft. Its just a pointless risk for the cats to make and it kinda shows they didnt want him that bad they'd risk him in the draft
You are overpaying.
These guys a blowing smoke circles. What do they and the others like Barrett do for days when nothing is happening? Ping Pong?
It's embarrassing.
"play the mental health card".... what a soul less statement.
Quintessential Sports Journalism.
Mental health didn't matter to Geelong with respect to Tim Kelly.
Geelong will bend Bulldogs over more than a prisoner in the showers.
Facts are the Bulldogs Have Lost him so last minute they will take pick 17 and the Cats are the best in the league at trading. Players have to want to play for you as Melbourne will find out!
The trade gossip goes on and coming into the last three days. Watch the deals drop and player's move to a new club .😊
Can Collingwood offer pick 13 for Smith?
They can, but ultimately it's Smith that has to accept going to Collingwood - which he won't.
Just shorten the trade week ffs
If I’m the Dogs I’m making him go to the draft and if another club says we will match his money then that forces the Cats to pay what he’s worth. Hey dogs remember Ollie Henry I wished the pies just made him walk to the draft instead of being paid way unders.
Oh boo hoo.
You didn't play Ollie Henry in your regular 22. He was kept down in the VFL yet you wanted a top ten pick.
Either play these players in your best team or lose them. Losers like Alex Johnson were getting games ahead of him.
Collingwood are the last team to talk about loyalty, when you pushed Treloar and Grundy out of the club to get out of paying what you owed them. Collingwood can't be trusted to honor a contract.
How much are you offering for Dan Houston? Top ten pick or you are lowballing Port.
Also, I invite the Bulldogs to walk Smith to the ND. Do it!
No other club will take a risk on a guy coming off an ACL, who hasn't played well the last few seasons, who they haven't spoken too and who hasn't done a medical, doesn't want to play for them and will request a trade one year in anyway, where they will get even less (since he is a year older), when they could use that pick on a promising kid in a super draft, just to stick it up Geelong.
No, watch instead as teams pick kids, and when it comes to our pick, we choose Bailey Smith.
Who knows, Geelong may even do a deal with another club draft night to get higher in the draft order, to draft him sooner.
Your club more than most knows that. You got Luke Ball that way. It worked then, and it will work now.
But I think Bulldogs will cave and just take 17. Better than nothing. The only way they get anything from the deal is to go through us.
More than money. Couple of problems with letting him walk to the draft.
First of all, he gets to stipulate his conditions. This includes refusing to meet with any clubs or refusing to take a medical. This is problematic as he already has a fractured relationship with his current club, so clubs would want to meet with him to gauge his mindset before drafting him. They'd also want a medical for a bloke coming off an ACL - no club would deal with them issues.
Secondly, if the Dogs walk him to the draft, they get nothing. They'll cut their nose of to spite their face. A first rounder, even if it's a late first, is better than nothing.
Geelong simply hold the balance of power in this. If he gets walked to the draft he will end up Geelong anyway. If they deal in good faith, which is better for all parties involved, then Dogs will be forced to take whatever the Cats offer.
End of the day, there will be a middle ground reached. It will be more than Geelong has on the table right now and less than the Dogs want.
@@ianscott424 The same thing happened to Nick Stevens who wanted to get to Collingwood and Port let him go to the draft and it didn’t stop Carlton from taking him and he remained there for the rest of his time in the game.
@@peternut358 But here is what Geelong can do.
On trade night, we can do pick swaps with another team to get higher in the draft.
Like offer Gold Coast lower picks to give them points and we get a pick higher than 17 off them, so we can get Smith even earlier.
Wanting to put Smith in the draft shows that the Bulldogs are even stupider than they look.
@@peternut358 Why not just send him to the draft then?
I dare your list manager to announce that they will no longer deal with us and won't accept anything we offer (as you are asking for a top ten pick, which we don't have, meaning you have no intention of trading) and just say that you will walk him to the draft.
Put up or shut up.
I bet you won't because you are too chickenshit to follow through. You talk a good game. You don't because you NEED Geelong, more than we need you.
You have no top twenty pick in a super draft, and we have one to give. Get over your pride and accept the trade.
So stop with your threats because of you were going to do it, you would have done it by now.
Bailey Smith was 7th pick in his draft? How is he now worth so much less with years of experience under the belt?
He was in a great draft year too.
Because he has just had an ACL and he is out of contract (if Bulldogs had really wanted him and loved him that much, they would have offered him a $1 million a year 7 year contract to stay, instead of letting him fall out of contract).
You wouldn't have played him in the midfield anymore anyway if he came back. Need to keep those midfield spots for no-names like Garcia, Gallagher and Sanders.
@@dhenderson1810 what the dogs would or wouldn’t do with him is irrelevant, it’s about what he’s worth to Geelong. Obviously doggies fan bias here, but he’s a way better player than some of the people touted to be traded for better picks, not to mention cases like Lachie Weller being traded for pick 2. Everything being discussed for Smith atm is way unders.
Stringer has 13 years of experience. Should be worth a first round pick?
@@hadesau7702 Stringer is 30, Smith (23) is arguably gonna be in his prime next few years.
He's uncontracted, he's got a fractured relationship with the Dogs, has had personal issues and he's coming off an ACL.
Is he worth more than 17? It would be easy to make an argument to say he is. Doesn't mean that the Dogs will get it. A player is only worth what someone is willing to pay for them.
Hegmann Ridge
Absolutely ridiculous. Baz is 100% worth more than pick 17. He won the best finals player at 21. Worth a top 10 pick minimum.
Do you give your own best player of the finals award? Cos he definitely didn’t win any award given by anyone else, look it up.
and then since 21, he has been out of form and done his acl.
Hello, three years ago.
Tim Kelly trade should be the price the Dogs set.
What's it got to do with you?
Worry about your own trades.
@@dhenderson1810 Special deals for Geelong distort the competition and equalisation measures. It impacts everyone.
Pick 17 (which will end up in the 20s after bids) for Baz is pathetic. Bolton, Baker and Rioli going for top 12 picks + extras is absurd in comparison. What are these journos smoking?
The key difference is that the tigers players are contracted. Meaning RIchmond can dictate the value or else they keep them. Smith is uncontracted so can leave for nothing. Dogs really don't have much leverage, not to mention the baggage that Bailey comes with (drugs, mental health) and a dodgy ACL
@@oliverhumphris4771Baker isn't contacted and he's one year away from free agency. Plus he's not anywhere near Bolton or Smith..
Then those clubs are overpaying for Richmond scrubbers.
Baker for Pick 14 is not a better player than Smith... Neither is Rioli for Pick 6 and maybe more. Also a 29 year old Tom Barrass is "apparently" worth a first round pick and a 2nd. Smith is 6 years younger and has way more potential. The media just want us to roll over and accept a pick in the mid 20's, yet if it was the other way around they'd want us to stump up 3 first round picks... Geelong can offer up SDK or Dempsey and it's a fair deal.
Seriously, pick 17 for Bailey smith is sh1te. R1 plus a round 2 …… I’m sick of jay clarke and commentators come up with their biased opinions. How much do Geelong pay these guys.
Lmaooo, offer up SDK, fair deal? You’re out of your mind, dogs would need to give Bailey smith, a 1st round and 2nd round pick for Geelong to even consider that deal which they’d likely still deny. SDK is worth more than Smith and Geelong will look to keep him for the rest of his career just as Andrew Mackie said. Also only in your dreams Geelong would offer up Dempsey.
Bailey Smith been meh the last 2 years with 0 games played last season, suffered 2 ACL tears in the left and then an ACL tear to his right knee. Pick 15-20 and potentially a future 2nd or 3rd round pick is quite fair, Bulldogs don’t have a lot of options as he’s out of contract, first round pick around 20 is better than letting him go to the draft where they’ll get nothing for him and Geelong would probably get him anyway. At best dogs would get 1st round pick and like a future 2nd round pick
Let him go to national draft for nothing or take what you can get and move on
@@Banterboi7 I agree dude, these guys are a disgrace.
@@keithwilson4966 SHite? Hasnt played for 2 yrs mate, & has numerous ongoing injuries, drug & mental issues. Get real. He may never play again at this rate. No, what will happen is that you will take whatever we offer & thank us for taking a huge risk off your hands. Or go to the draft & get NOTHING 4 him. 17 or nothing. No skin off our nose. 🤣
Unfair? ..you on the real world ?? Poor Baily ..millions of $$ coz he is a simp ?
If A Deal Doesn't Happen, Trade Him To A Club With A Higher 1st Rounder eg: Carlton Or Melbourne.
Sure, in the fantasy land where players don't have to consent to trades.
Maybe WC could do the same with Barrass? Just trade him to the highest bidder?
The human side of it!
What a load of rubbish.
Smith is over rated….
Worth More Than 17 So!, If Cats Want Him🤔 I Say 17+ Either Jhye Clark, Shannon Neale, Ollie Dempsey Or More Likely Connor O'Sullivan.
He is out of contract and leaving. The dogs may have to take unders because of that fact. The cats do not have to (and won’t) pay overs like in your silly trade proposals . Having said that, he is worth slightly more than pick 17.
been out of form, off an acl and out of contract. he can go to draft and the cats will get him for 17. no one is giving him more
🤣