"the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation for increasing work productivity and reducing anxiety/depression in the workplace". WOW, people really would do anything to say that they care for the well-being of their employees, anything but to pay them more.
I will suggest if you can make a video on how to use PRISMA SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW in social sciences research. I read that not all the 27 step can be included in once writings.
My prof said I have to hand in a Prisma-Statement of my sources with Excel. Do I just have to put in the numners of the pages on the checklist for every spurce or do I need to write something inside
In the PRISMA model, identification involves collecting a broad set of potentially relevant studies through systematic searches across various sources. Screening, on the other hand, narrows down these studies by removing duplicates and excluding those that do not meet the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. While identification casts a wide net, screening ensures only eligible studies move forward for analysis.
My first time viewing this, or being exposed to this format, at 10:48 you mentioned it says you must present it as a systematic review, meta-analysis or both? You then changed your title from just "systematic review..." to include meta-analysis, I'm not seeing that in the checklist, as it clearly says "Identify the report as a systematic review", can you help me clarify why you did this? Or is this because you did both? Thanks
I think this is the only transparent and genuine explanation available on RUclips. Thank you, Sir!
"the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation for increasing work productivity and reducing anxiety/depression in the workplace".
WOW, people really would do anything to say that they care for the well-being of their employees, anything but to pay them more.
I will suggest if you can make a video on how to use PRISMA SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW in social sciences research. I read that not all the 27 step can be included in once writings.
Thanks for the wonderful explanation of Prisma. I want to know the process of identifying common papers from two different databases.
How do we identify and remove the duplicates?
My prof said I have to hand in a Prisma-Statement of my sources with Excel. Do I just have to put in the numners of the pages on the checklist for every spurce or do I need to write something inside
the most difficult part is the one finding articles, and finding nothing at times.
NICE PROFESSOR
Do we have to mention page numbers only in the checklist where we have mentioned which section?
Hi, would you be able to explain how you would go about removing duplicates?
Are you using END note - there are some videos on that
Thank you very much for the video!
Can systematic reviews as references at the data extraction be included in a systematic review
What if I am doing a qualitative systematic review, the result of individual studies can it be the summary table?
Nicely explained? Sir, do i need to fill up the PRISMA checklist for all the included studies or just for my SR as you suggested in this lecture?
For the Systematic Review
thanks a lot for explanation !
When to use PICO and PICo . Can we use spider and spice in management studies
Prisma statement is only for medical or even management studies can use . Do we need to register our title .
sir what is the difference between screening and identification
In the PRISMA model, identification involves collecting a broad set of potentially relevant studies through systematic searches across various sources. Screening, on the other hand, narrows down these studies by removing duplicates and excluding those that do not meet the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. While identification casts a wide net, screening ensures only eligible studies move forward for analysis.
How do you score a study using PRISMA? Does a study receive a score out of 27, 1 point for each item that it fulfills?
How to remove duplicate s from Refworks? I have renamed the file names already, will it effect?
My first time viewing this, or being exposed to this format, at 10:48 you mentioned it says you must present it as a systematic review, meta-analysis or both? You then changed your title from just "systematic review..." to include meta-analysis, I'm not seeing that in the checklist, as it clearly says "Identify the report as a systematic review", can you help me clarify why you did this? Or is this because you did both? Thanks
Can you send me your study ?
Could you plz send me the doucment to me?