You really don't need AI for that. You just need to observe the situation without any investment in the outcome. The problem with "just" is that people always want something. It doesn't matter whether the outcome you prefer is justified... it still clouds your judgement.
Not long after this recording, ChatGPT indroduced plugins. The Wolfram Alpha plugin was one of the first & was released in collaboration with OpenAI. It's impressive how it enhances ChatGPT's basic functionality.
It will compete and displace white collar jobs on a large scale within five years. Law uses semantics not accessible to average people and this is ChatGPT's sweet spot. I write patents and was quite surprised how well it performed and feed me relevant information. Right now ChatGPT can't produce information without a human having to edit its "errors" but it will quickly get better and will require less and less human input.
I am surprised that ChatGPT uses what seems to amount to “brute force” statistical regression and extrapolation on a word by word basis and the fact that it works is a function of the semantics inherent in its training data. Or am I wrong? Anyway Wolfram talked about how integrating the logic itself could be a more efficient way of doing this, rather than having the logic a byproduct of the connections developed during training. Or am I wrong about this too? I really want to understand this.
@@SpamMouse That's called adblocker. I want to filter out wokeholes and other ideological idiots, preferable from my life, but I'll settle for online filters.
X suspended my new account for nothing but drawings of inventions. I guess that means my theory of everything is right. All my new writing will go to substack from now on... This sucks...
Yeah it’s getting very difficult to train it on any more data because the internet is polluted with bogus data it created. It will not learn anything new, it would only learn incorrect information that makes it dumber. Same problem Wikipedia has. Often a Wikipedia article will have incorrect information submitted, and other sources will use that information and repost it citing Wikipedia. Then it is difficult to know which is true because the internet now believes in the false information
If it could call wolfram alpha 🤣🤣 Amazing how this guy manages to insert himself and his product into "the next big thing" at a moments notice as if he was some kind of insider behind the scenes with a really deep understanding of chat GPT and its developers like they kept Steve in the loop with the experiments they tried, etc. Hint: he wasn't, and his understands is no better than the vast majority of other people.
@@dai19721 These films have profoundly and permanently changed the life perspective of countless people across the world. What have you done that is more successful than that?
@@dai19721 The films successfully changed the way of seeing the world of countless people from all over the world. It was a paradigm shift for many, many people. What have you done?
Main Episode With Stephen Wolfram (March 2023): ruclips.net/video/xHPQ_oSsJgg/видео.html
Curt, I thought youd like this... mind blowing math.
ruclips.net/video/FUHkTs-Ipfg/видео.htmlsi=yGpj8bci4r8v0qWg
I want an AI to tell me when a politician is lying, and what is typically gained from those sorts of lies.
Plot twist.. politicians are already ais
Even ChatGPT would say ”when a politician open his/her mouth”
Mouth is moving.
Money in politicians pocket.
Anything else?
You really don't need AI for that. You just need to observe the situation without any investment in the outcome. The problem with "just" is that people always want something. It doesn't matter whether the outcome you prefer is justified... it still clouds your judgement.
Or how many words can be said to give a non answer to a question lol
Not long after this recording, ChatGPT indroduced plugins. The Wolfram Alpha plugin was one of the first & was released in collaboration with OpenAI. It's impressive how it enhances ChatGPT's basic functionality.
what the heck can it do ?
It will compete and displace white collar jobs on a large scale within five years. Law uses semantics not accessible to average people and this is ChatGPT's sweet spot. I write patents and was quite surprised how well it performed and feed me relevant information. Right now ChatGPT can't produce information without a human having to edit its "errors" but it will quickly get better and will require less and less human input.
Is it just me or does GPT's brain look like a map of Matter and dark Matter in the Universe.
Good clip. Ty
The obvious question from a guy cleaning the roomba store would be... why GPT does not explain itself in a video ? :)
The same way most people can't represent themselves in terms of who they think they are.
I am surprised that ChatGPT uses what seems to amount to “brute force” statistical regression and extrapolation on a word by word basis and the fact that it works is a function of the semantics inherent in its training data. Or am I wrong? Anyway Wolfram talked about how integrating the logic itself could be a more efficient way of doing this, rather than having the logic a byproduct of the connections developed during training. Or am I wrong about this too? I really want to understand this.
Yeah I doubt he's right. Look at the argument against the stochastic parrot fallacy on google. Also, Geoff Hinton's newly released talk
I want AI to filter out nonsense from my online experience.
An anti-advertising filter.
@@SpamMouse That's called adblocker. I want to filter out wokeholes and other ideological idiots, preferable from my life, but I'll settle for online filters.
@@Run.Ran.Run1 That would be So cool. 👍 Anti-SJW filter would sell for millions.
@@SpamMouse 👍
brillant speaking.
Seeing the robot turn and look towards the camera at the end was super creepy. 😂
Is MindFest happening again this March?
Dear Curt, please have a chat with Chris Letho regarding recent videos. 👍
X suspended my new account for nothing but drawings of inventions. I guess that means my theory of everything is right. All my new writing will go to substack from now on... This sucks...
No, it's a new opportunity! A new chapter. Where can we find you? 🙂
@@funkymunky and thank you for the kind words. I really needed some today. ❤️
@@billschwandt1 ❤️
@@billschwandt1 Is it "Reality Ragtime" on Substack? Much love ❤️
What do you mean? Are you going to put your ideas on RUclips too?
I'm interested in any new ideas.
What will happen to Chat GPT when more and more content on the web is from Chat GPT - it will learn from itself?
Yeah it’s getting very difficult to train it on any more data because the internet is polluted with bogus data it created. It will not learn anything new, it would only learn incorrect information that makes it dumber. Same problem Wikipedia has. Often a Wikipedia article will have incorrect information submitted, and other sources will use that information and repost it citing Wikipedia. Then it is difficult to know which is true because the internet now believes in the false information
How can it "learn" from a closed data set?
If it could call wolfram alpha 🤣🤣 Amazing how this guy manages to insert himself and his product into "the next big thing" at a moments notice as if he was some kind of insider behind the scenes with a really deep understanding of chat GPT and its developers like they kept Steve in the loop with the experiments they tried, etc. Hint: he wasn't, and his understands is no better than the vast majority of other people.
Clicked this link because you LIED to me and added GPT-5 to your title. Big hit to your credibility
I’ll never be able to trust again 😢
Yeah brah, this poster is a fucking lying McTard brah q
New Zeitgeist film premiere in March
give me a break. it failed
@@dai19721 The films didn't fail. Your expectations were unrealistic.
@@dystopiaeatsmoney no seriously....they failed.
@@dai19721 These films have profoundly and permanently changed the life perspective of countless people across the world.
What have you done that is more successful than that?
@@dai19721 The films successfully changed the way of seeing the world of countless people from all over the world.
It was a paradigm shift for many, many people.
What have you done?