That is not math. That is just someone who does not know anything about math. This type of person will see numerical coincidences and believe that there is a pattern there. These people say names like "Calabi-Yau Einstein Newton," but they do not even know what a proof is.
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here: idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation. Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds. Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants. The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level. At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission. ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
Today i learned temperature and force of attraction are related to each other to prove gravity. Thank you drwsld. I guess this means in winter gravity is weaker and we can jump extra high :)
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here: idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation. Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds. Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants. The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level. At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission. ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here: idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation. Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds. Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants. The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level. At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission. ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
I actually have a way to test it through satisfiability but I'm met with videos like this and my comments lol This is literally titled "dummy notes". I have a video where people can casually prove me wrong that the equation I have in previous videos correctly assigns satisfiability before variable assignment. Very easy to prove me wrong
also my comment keeps disappearing so i'll post my response to Sharur directly here: idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation. Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds. Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants. The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level. At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission. ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
@@drwsld I have a doctorate in theoretical physics and you are pulling my yang-mills plum duff. It's as plausuble as a susvara with a $100k headphone cable.
this guy drwsld lies knowing that he is lying, and he actually hopes that people will go there to insult him. most of his videos are pure rage-bating, i am a mathematician, and indeed, browsing his video for 10 minutes, i wanted to smash my laptop... this kind of fake RUclips videos feed on the attention of those who try to tell them they are wrong. They know they are, but that's how they make money.
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here: idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation. Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds. Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants. The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level. At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission. ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Can you keep reacting and debunking schizophrenics this was peak
Tanks for propping up my second (or more) channel 📺
PS You two should get on @joerogan 🤜🏾🤛🏼
That is not math. That is just someone who does not know anything about math. This type of person will see numerical coincidences and believe that there is a pattern there. These people say names like "Calabi-Yau Einstein Newton," but they do not even know what a proof is.
This would be a great “don’t do drugs” ad campaign
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here:
idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation.
Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds.
Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants.
The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level.
At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission.
ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD
ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn
and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
😱
Today i learned temperature and force of attraction are related to each other to prove gravity. Thank you drwsld. I guess this means in winter gravity is weaker and we can jump extra high :)
So also during night gravity is less and during day is more. Infact hot summer days are heavy.
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here:
idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation.
Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds.
Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants.
The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level.
At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission.
ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD
ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn
and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
I want you to talk about DACs endlessly for a while
Done
dunning-kruger moment
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here:
idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation.
Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds.
Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants.
The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level.
At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission.
ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD
ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn
and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
@@drwsld sorry bro, links are blocked by default in my youtube comments. i just approved all your comments though.
If he can solve p=np he can claim millions of dollars prize money ... but I guess it will remain unclaimed! I think this guy is joking around.
he's not
@@sharuraudio then he's a whack-a-doodle
I actually have a way to test it through satisfiability but I'm met with videos like this and my comments lol
This is literally titled "dummy notes". I have a video where people can casually prove me wrong that the equation I have in previous videos correctly assigns satisfiability before variable assignment. Very easy to prove me wrong
also my comment keeps disappearing so i'll post my response to Sharur directly here:
idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation.
Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds.
Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants.
The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level.
At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission.
ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD
ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn
and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
@@drwsld I have a doctorate in theoretical physics and you are pulling my yang-mills plum duff. It's as plausuble as a susvara with a $100k headphone cable.
this guy drwsld lies knowing that he is lying, and he actually hopes that people will go there to insult him. most of his videos are pure rage-bating, i am a mathematician, and indeed, browsing his video for 10 minutes, i wanted to smash my laptop... this kind of fake RUclips videos feed on the attention of those who try to tell them they are wrong. They know they are, but that's how they make money.
I make no money off RUclips lol
What's gravity
Numerology on crack
my comment is getting deleted repeatedly so i'll post my response to Sharur if you don't mind here:
idk if my comment was deleted, but i'm not mad at this type of content or deliberation except for the schizophrenia part. You reacted to a video titled "dummy notes" basically. I have official videos claiming 1/27 to be the MASS GAP RATE of Yang-Mills, so at the x and y, there are inputs of 1/27, and use Edward Witten's math to relate the Hamiltonian and Lattice Perturbation.
Yang-Mills is at 2D, and this video is about QUANTUM gravity, not gravity. which can be simulated at 2D. I relate absolute zero Kelvin and the volume of a gas at 0 kelvin being 0 meters cubic meters, hence me using meters and seconds.
Since im gathering someone paid you to react to this or you found it, considering most of my comments initiate insults like you did, you can at least react to my OFFICIAL videos where i derive the rates (1), (1/4), and (1/27) from an equation i made to make 0's and negatives work for the Collatz Conjecture and that these rates give me EXACT electron permittivity from Koide's Equation while the equation itself gives me answers to things like the Infinite Triangle Problem from Lewis Carroll, etc. other P=NP problems. All im saying is 1 is the 1D rate, 1/4 is the 2D rate, and 1/27 is the 3d rate for Yang-Mills and these act as quantum gravity constants.
The thing that kinda hurts or is disingenuous about the video is you omitted the part where i have a LIGO chart with the Black Hole Mass Gap at 3/80 solar masses = 0.0375 and 1/27 is 0.037. But gathering from this video, you watched one video titled "dummy notes" and went to town. You omitted alot actaully jusyt to make me look dumb (not an expert, i say multiple times these are theories in my videos). All im saying throughout my channel is 1/27 is a MASS GAP RATE in Yang-Mills and it seems to act as a QUANTUM gravity number, not traditional gravity. Just like Koide's Equation have THREE BODIES, THREE LEPTON BODIES and I'm able to use these rates and the mass 2/3 Koide got to get how many electrons belong at each energy level.
At least react to these videos before you clown me and use me in the thumbnail without linking my video in the description or asking for permission.
ruclips.net/video/Vo6iF_o33SU/видео.htmlsi=kfpAXYhDwa4CJjQD
ruclips.net/video/bAB6Y0DOmZg/видео.htmlsi=8kswCyKKFfu08mpn
and as for the P=NP thing, very easy way to prove me wrong on that. It can properly "guess" the satisfiability of a Boolean expression given a set of rules i made. just toss an expression in and prove it wrong, that's all P=NP is lol thanks, please react to the videos i just supplied, im not schizo and you reacted to a few short minutes of hours of work.
W video
Gravity is not real. No object pulls another one towards its.
You are not real. No barrymckockiner8737 exists.