Geraldo just made obvious circumstantial claims. And he just sat there and smiled. Looking like he doesn't give a crap one way or another. It's easy to blindly trust our justice system. But yeah it's great seeing him again. He definitely gave us a lot of details on that hard evidence........ Not...... Everyone is going to assume he is guilty no matter what (still do, it's more about feelings than hard evidence). So just because he planned to take off. How is that evidence that he murdered her?
I feel so badly for Laci's mom and family to be put through all this again. Scott was convicted, he's guilty and now these idiots want to help him get out? It's shameful.
Why don't we just wait to see what they have to say before rendering guilt or innocence here. I mean, I know people couldn't do that before, hence why there's this push for a new trial.
Hey, we've all gone fishing on Christmas Eve on the same day our 8 months pregnant wife went missing and her chopped in half body was found months later in the same spot......haven't we?
That isnt what righteous anger sounds like. HEY YOU. ROMANS 3:23. And NO. NOE. YOU KNOW WE HAVENT. PS. WE CANT ChristIANIZE WHATEVER WE LIKE. The day mass you made mention of? Isnt that of the Christ. But the Antichrist celebrations. Take care. Matthew 4:19-20
@@mananimal3644I mean did your wife go missing as you told police you were golfing, and no one knew you had a boat in the water where her body was found?
Exactly. Anyone going into this claiming Scott Peterson lacked a proper defense lacks knowledge in the US judicial system. He had the BEST defense team. There was nothing they missed. He had the money and means to track down any and all witnesses, to test evidence, etc. Mark Garagos didnt miss anything. This man found a sucker and he's milking it for all its worth. The courts won't be fooled though.
You are spot on. The LA innicense project is wasting peoples time and money even bringing up the Scott Peterson case. They had him dead to rights and justice was served...
I applaud the LA innocence project. They do due diligence before they act. In almost half of the cases that the Innocence Project takes on, the clients' guilt is reconfirmed by DNA testing. Of all the cases taken on by the Innocence Project so far, about 43% of clients were proven innocent, 42% were confirmed guilty, and evidence was inconclusive and not probative in 15% of cases.
Who are you to tell anyone that they don't deserve fairness? The justice system is corrupt, and it's time that the innocent be heard. If Scott is innocent, then he should walk free!
@@mananimal3644we already did. He was found guilty and sentenced to death. He's now serving life without parole because they don't do death anymore. He had the best defense attorney in the US (Mark Garagos) defending him. We already heard the evidence, he had a fair trial, and he was found guilty of murdering Lacy and Connor. The end dude. We don't have to reopen anything today. And the courts won't - they already said a second time that he was guilty when they gave him life without parole and no new trial. You're a sucker just like whoever he swindled at the LA Innocence Project. The guy who cried on recording to his secret GF about spending his first Christmas without a family... weeks before Lacy vanished... he's guilty. He doesn't deserve a new trial because he did it.
With no real hard evidence. Guilty of an affair doesn't mean he is guilty of a murder. Everything Geraldo said didn't make much sense. Someone taking off doesn't mean they are guilty of a crime either. It was nation wide news. Everyone is going to assume he is guilty no matter what (still do, it's more about feelings than hard evidence). So just because he planned to take off How is that evidence that he murdered her? A lot of my family members know that it's possible to be easily convicted of a crime you didn't do in the United States through a jury or a judge.
@@lizdahl847 It most certainly does. Scott should walk free if he was wrongly convicted. Shame on all those who jumped to condemn this man before all the evidence was heard.
Ugh IMO he is guilty. But I also have opened my eyes to misconduct etc and IF a retrial finds wrongdoing then let him out. He served time on death row nonetheless bc of that was me and I was innocent/ state can’t prove it then no way should I be in jail. I don’t think he would chance his craziness again. But gosh I loathe him.
I’m surprised that that man Scott Peterson has had managed to survive in CDC system one of toughest systems in the states. He went in with a bad paperwork usually inmates would have take care of inmates with a bad paperwork
Maybe you are upset because he turned you down for others. But if he's innocent then the man deserves to walk free. If he was wrongly convicted then a correction needs to be made.
I always thought the two burglars who robbed the house across the street that morning did it. In fact, one of them admitted to the murder on a recorded line in jail. But the police “lost the tape.”
Here's a podcast you can watch and listen to. True Crime Matters with Tara Marie. She breaks down in 4 parts the motion that the LAIP presented to the court. It's mostly witnesses. Including declarations from the Medina's. Steve Todd made the mistake of calling Glenn Pearce from the Medina's landline phone on the 24th.
@@Kns567 It's based on the case of Sam Sheppard, who was falsely convicted for his pregnant wife's brutal murder in 1954. He was a surgeon, served ten years of his sentence and was finally acquitted when defence attorney F. Lee Bailey took on his case. He had a terrible life after he was released, he volunteered to have live cancer cells injected into him and essentially drank himself to death. He died in 1970 as a result of liver failure. Several members of his family had previously died by suicide after Sheppard was convicted. He was also a wrestler for a brief number of years, but other than that small reprieve, he would never get to enjoy his freedom. A sad case. He never really got free of prison or his tragic life.
WHY is every single video on every single platform 4 mins long. This is so annoying. They don't even include everyone's responses in this "interview." Drives me absolutely crazy. I just want to watch the full interviews. This isn't tiktok. Ughhhhh...
Did he have enemies who'd care enough to frame him? What could be the motive? Did he cheat at golf and a disgruntled player decided that Scott had putted his last game? lol
He wasn’t on the Mexican border. He was meeting his Dad & brother at a golf course in San Diego. He was arrested at the golf course in San Diego. FACTS.
Laci had two ribs fractured at the time of death or shortly thereafter that is not consistent with the whole "soft kill" theory. Her shoulder bone was injured well after death. Then, there is the missing neck, which isn't consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. How about Laci's uterus that was at least 10 cm smaller than it should have been? So that explains the incision to remove Conner. The injured 9th rib, also postmortemis in the same location where such an incision would have been made. To top it off. Scott couldn't have killed Laci. Conners GA is proof of that. Conner was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Alison Galloway the States own expert and forensic anthropologist, determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. How is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th? Plenty of incriminating evidence against S Todd and G Pearce existed. Lt. Aponte gave a signed statement to defense investigators which said the prisoner had been interviewed by MPD, and that MPD had received a copy of the taped phone conversation. Instead of this information being disclosed during discovery. The only information provided to the defense about his tip was a simple notation on a CD which included 10,000 other tips about the case. -Merlin, the trailing dog owned by Cindee Valentin, trailed Laci's scent to the Gallo Winery in the airport district, on the night of December 26. Not far from the burglars residence. -December 31, a gold Croton watch, identical to Laci’s watch which disappeared the same day she did, was pawned by Deanna Renfro. Highly unlikely this is just a coincidence. It gets better. The families of Deanna Renfro, Steven Todd and the Tenbrinks know one another. -Diane Jackson reported seeing 3 men with a VAN and a SAFE in front of the Medina’s house at 11:40 a.m. on December 24. There is no debating this. The burglary happened the same day Laci disappeared. Both Todd and Pearce pled guilty to burglary charges 12-24-02. They both received reduced sentences. - S Todd would have received 25 years for his third offense. So why did he get 8 years and 8 months, far less than 25 years. Pearce received only 180 days, yet he was another career criminal. -Tom Harshman, who lived in Modesto, was driving with Elizabeth Harshman between 2 and 4 p.m. on the afternoon of December 24. He saw a young pregnant woman being forced into a van. He turned around and went back to the spot hoping to find the van still there and hoping to get more information about the license plate number. But they were gone. 1. He called police (911 MPD) that same day. 2. Tried again December 28. 3. December 28, he also called the Laci tip line twice. His first call on this date was listed incorrectly under the name Harsh and was given Bates Stamp number 14789. The call was given to Detective Holmes. Harsh(man) said that he had called 3 or 4 days earlier on the day that he had seen a pregnant young woman being pushed into a van. There had been a man standing over her as she squatted to urinate with her back up against a chain-link fence. The man was described as 30’s, tall, thin, with ponytail, dirty blonde to gray hair, scrubby looking. When she finished, the woman was shepherded back to the driver’s door of the car, where another man’s arm was seen pulling her into the car. He said the young woman was wearing black pants and a red shirt. He said she had a scared look on her face." 4. Jan 3rd, he went to the Command Post in the park and relayed this to the officer on duty. Over 40,000 pages in the discovery and nothing about this report was in it. 5. February 2003, Harshman’s wife spoke to a relative of hers who lived in New York about the sighting of Laci Peterson near the corner of Scenic and Claus. Mrs. Harshman’s relative shared this story with an NYPD detective. This NYPD detective was so concerned that he contacted the MPD and spoke personally to Detective Grogan on February 14, 2003. What did Grogan do with the information? Nothing at all 6. pre-trial hearings in May of 2004, DA Investigator Kevin Bertalotto noticed the Harshman tip and insisted that Grogan call Tom Harshman and speak to him personally. Grogan did this on May 18, 2004. An audiotape and a transcription of his conversation with Harshman to the defense on May 20, 11 days before the beginning of the trial.
That intrrviewer the other night shpuld have asked him who he thought the real killer was. If they sound robotic computerized and lawyered up that can be revealing. Usually innocent people will express anger thats real toward the person. Like polly klaas father. When they tell who they think did it. Some innocent people though can sound ubaffected and unemotional . Which can be misleading.
He’s probably guilty but if you put Geraldo on your network you have zero credibility as an organization. We were hoping NN would be real news. But it’s turned into mainstream cable crap.
I agree. That GR is projecting. Let's put it this way. I got his number. I have all their numbers. Fake News. They are not in the pursuit of justice or truth.
Let’s ask some Hollywood writers if they’d make a movie based on Scott’s story or if they’d pass. My money is on them passing because it’s simply not believable.
Scott Peterson is 💯 guilty for killing Laci and Connor! He went fishing in the bay and her torso washed up on the shoreline and Connors body washed up on the shoreline near his mother's and I have to say that is the first thing that I believe that he is 💯 guilty of killing them both. So I have to agree with Geraldo that Scott Peterson is guilty and he needs to be locked up in prison for what he did to her and the baby.
I used to think SP was 💯 guilty until I watched a documentary that shed light on a few other things. If you really think about it the only reason he was found guilty was because of Amber Frye's testimony there was not a shred of physical evidence. I think had I been a juror I wouldn't have been able to say for sure he was guilty or not guilty. I think everyone wants to just automatically think he's guilty without looking into some other sources, things aren't always what they seem.
Geraldo has been so wrong so many times that I actually kind of want him to get sued into oblivion for this. As a purported “journalist,” if Peterson is exonerated ( a long shot, certainly - but none of us know the exact details of what actually happened - we don’t) he should have Geraldo’s empty wrinkle bag on his mantle. Either way- this is about as unprofessional as it gets.
They are a bunch of liars. They don't want people to think for themselves. If there is evidence let's have an open mind. The innocence Project took his case.
Just the fact he was lying to the other woman about not being married, and weird action around Christmas makes no sense saying that he is innocent. Geragos is a classic sleazy lawyer for his angle.
Guilty of an affair doesn't mean he is guilty of a murder. Everything Geraldo said didn't make much sense. Someone taking off doesn't mean they are guilty of a crime either. It was nation wide news. Everyone is going to assume he is guilty no matter what (still do, it's more about feelings than hard evidence). So just because he planned to take off How is that evidence that he murdered her? A lot of my family members know that it's possible to be easily convicted of a crime you didn't do in the United States through a jury or a judge.
@@deegee2416you should just use a different judicial system, like China. Your family wouldn't have much to say about a democratic judicial system with jurors then. 😂
If my husband went missing, I wouldn't lie about my whereabouts. If I went fishing, I'd say so. I wouldn't lie about golfing. I would cry on every news station while I searched night and day for my family. Scott didn't. It's a lot more than an affair. He also told his GF that it was his first Christmas without his family - weeks before Lacy vanished. They weren't even separated. Where had he predicted they'd be December 25th if not around their decorated tree?
@@tishwitch And that's the problem. That is where it all started-that alleged affair. I'm talking about hard evidence. Not subjective feelings on what you think you would have done with or without your husband, or what you would have told who or who not. And how you react to a different situation. The cops can and will lie. Why would you tell the cops anything you did that day? What's strange is that I knew another guy. When I was not so smart and thought our government did and could do no wrong. They lied, saying that he confessed to murder. It never happened. And when they finally released what he actually said, he said nothing of the sorts. Why would they not want him to have a fair trial? Maybe people have been watching too many Dirty Harry movies. Where people's rights truly don't matter. And the government likes to play hero and tell who can and who won't show up for a jail visit. Is it possible that our government thinks it's okay to lie because they believe the guy doesn't deserve a fair trial? They just don't want to get caught and they think it's justified. Not only they don't want to get caught. They don't want it to end up on the internet to show them in a bad light.
@@deegee2416 why would you tell the cops anything? Because if you're not involved, you're entire focus should be on helping police and the public find your pregnant spouse (and nearly born son). That's why silly. It's to help build an accurate timeline and account of Lacy's day, to find her alive. The cops didn't care about the affair, until it became relevant because HE lied. He could have said nothing. But he chose to lie, he didn't choose quiet. That's why the focus was all over him. And when he "coincidently" lied about fishing where the family's bodies washed up? And he hid a BOAT then fled? That's a circumstantial murder case, and his inevitable conviction.
That interviewer the other night shoukd gave asked him whoif they sound vomputerized and robotic. If they sound lawyered up do you believe the real killer was. Sometimes that can be revealing❤
then why did he lie about being in Europe to Amber and said his wife died before it was told to world and the fact he was looking at the ocean - come on
Baby killer buys a boat weeks before his wife vanishes, he's making homemade cement anchors in the storage unit which they never found, (because they are attached to Lacey at the bottom of the bay) he goes fishing on Christmas Eve all alone 90 miles away while his 8 month pregnant wife is home alone and tells no one, he tells his lover that he's a widow before Lacey even goes missing, he's watching porn the day after she's reported missing, during the vigil for his missing pregnant wife, he's on the phone with is lover pretending to be in Paris. Lets see, what else: he rents a car and goes to the bay to watch the police searches of the water, he sells Lacey's car, he dye's his hair red, he has 15k cash in the car along with zip ties, a shovel, clothing, a map of his lovers house, fake ID's, family member's credit cards and he's arrested on the boarder of Mexico.
Harshman Grogan testimony GERAGOS: And they have witnessed the incident, and don't know if they have called Modesto PD yet or not, correct? GROGAN: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. JUDGE: Does he say what time of the day that was? GERAGOS: This was at 10:08? GROGAN: That would be 10:08 a.m. GERAGOS: So, at this point, Mr. Harshman has called on the 28th at 6:50 said he saw a woman being forced into a van, gave a description of the van. Then approximately two months later a New York City police detective says, I have talked to, presumably, Harshman's wife who may have witnessed the incident, correct? GROGAN: Yes. He got the information from a friend of Miss Harshman's, Mr. Harshman's wife, I believe. GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically you contacted him on May 18th, 2004, correct? GROGAN: Yes. GERAGOS: And he, when you contacted him, he told you that the same day he called into the police department. You put it down at 12:28, right? GROGAN: Yes, based on that tip. GERAGOS: I don't think you ever saw this. I'm just going to show this to you. When I went through the tip lines, at 14789, it looks like somebody called in, but the name that was written down was Thomas Harsh. Do you see that? GROGAN: I see it. GERAGOS: Okay. You hadn't seen that before right now, had you? GROGAN: No. GERAGOS: Okay. It says, reporting that three or four days ago he saw a pregnant lady being pushed into a van. Caller given to Detective Holmes. You were not aware that Harsh had indicated that it was three or four days prior to the 28th when he had actually phoned in; isn't that correct? GROGAN: No, I don't think so. GERAGOS: Okay. This is the first time that you have seen that, because when the caller, whoever took down the information, they just wrote Harsh as opposed to Harshman, correct? GROGAN: Correct. GERAGOS: Okay. And he said that he, specifically, on the same day that he had called in, he had seen a van parked on the south side of Scenic, west of Claus, which he described as a 70s, American-made model, beige in color, correct? GROGAN: Is that the tip that you are reading from top? GERAGOS: No. I'm at 4527. GROGAN: Yes.
Thank you, Geraldo, it was great seeing you again, I'm glad you remember the truth too, he most definitely did do it to two lives.
Geraldo just made obvious circumstantial claims. And he just sat there and smiled. Looking like he doesn't give a crap one way or another. It's easy to blindly trust our justice system. But yeah it's great seeing him again. He definitely gave us a lot of details on that hard evidence........ Not...... Everyone is going to assume he is guilty no matter what (still do, it's more about feelings than hard evidence). So just because he planned to take off. How is that evidence that he murdered her?
I feel so badly for Laci's mom and family to be put through all this again. Scott was convicted, he's guilty and now these idiots want to help him get out? It's shameful.
Why don't we just wait to see what they have to say before rendering guilt or innocence here.
I mean, I know people couldn't do that before, hence why there's this push for a new trial.
Don’t protect a man who LET HIS FRIENDS DIE
That’s a despicable human being. Selfish to the core
@@joseabreu-nn5cu what friends? What happened?
Hey, we've all gone fishing on Christmas Eve on the same day our 8 months pregnant wife went missing and her chopped in half body was found months later in the same spot......haven't we?
That isnt what righteous anger sounds like. HEY YOU. ROMANS 3:23. And NO. NOE. YOU KNOW WE HAVENT. PS. WE CANT ChristIANIZE WHATEVER WE LIKE. The day mass you made mention of? Isnt that of the Christ. But the Antichrist celebrations. Take care. Matthew 4:19-20
I went hunting this past Christmas Eve. I went hiking on Christmas Eve so I guess that makes me guilty of murder😂
@@mananimal3644I mean did your wife go missing as you told police you were golfing, and no one knew you had a boat in the water where her body was found?
Being mean is not conclusive evidence of murder. Sorry 🤷🏿♂️
I mean in my family we have a tradition of hunting on thanksgiving morning every year ..
Guilty!! SP made cement anchors in his storage shed
Boats use anchors. It doesn't prove anything.
Shame on the LA innocence project. Wasting people's time, energy, & money on someone who got more due process than most will ever receive.
Exactly. Anyone going into this claiming Scott Peterson lacked a proper defense lacks knowledge in the US judicial system. He had the BEST defense team. There was nothing they missed. He had the money and means to track down any and all witnesses, to test evidence, etc. Mark Garagos didnt miss anything. This man found a sucker and he's milking it for all its worth. The courts won't be fooled though.
You are spot on. The LA innicense project is wasting peoples time and money even bringing up the Scott Peterson case. They had him dead to rights and justice was served...
How do _you_ know?
I applaud the LA innocence project. They do due diligence before they act.
In almost half of the cases that the Innocence Project takes on, the clients' guilt is reconfirmed by DNA testing. Of all the cases taken on by the Innocence Project so far, about 43% of clients were proven innocent, 42% were confirmed guilty, and evidence was inconclusive and not probative in 15% of cases.
Who are you to tell anyone that they don't deserve fairness? The justice system is corrupt, and it's time that the innocent be heard. If Scott is innocent, then he should walk free!
He is guilty. Can't get past the cement pails in the boat storage and the boat no one knew about
Shouldn’t you wait to hear all the evidence bf you condemn an innocent man. 🤷🏿♂️
@@mananimal3644we already did. He was found guilty and sentenced to death. He's now serving life without parole because they don't do death anymore. He had the best defense attorney in the US (Mark Garagos) defending him. We already heard the evidence, he had a fair trial, and he was found guilty of murdering Lacy and Connor. The end dude. We don't have to reopen anything today. And the courts won't - they already said a second time that he was guilty when they gave him life without parole and no new trial. You're a sucker just like whoever he swindled at the LA Innocence Project.
The guy who cried on recording to his secret GF about spending his first Christmas without a family... weeks before Lacy vanished... he's guilty. He doesn't deserve a new trial because he did it.
I’m innocent.
@@Incel_81 you're a weirdo sitting at home streaming your gaming. But the real Scott Peterson is rotting in prison for the murders he committed.
Cement pails? Say wha? 😂
Yep we remember! Guilty AF!!!
Geraldo quickly walks back the " a Fetus is a person" remark.
You can't have it both ways.
at 8-9 months pregnant...wasn't she that far along?
indeed, Trudoh! Take care.
@@lynnhubbard844 8 months.
Scott Peterson is 100 percent guilty!!
agree
With no real hard evidence. Guilty of an affair doesn't mean he is guilty of a murder. Everything Geraldo said didn't make much sense. Someone taking off doesn't mean they are guilty of a crime either. It was nation wide news. Everyone is going to assume he is guilty no matter what (still do, it's more about feelings than hard evidence). So just because he planned to take off How is that evidence that he murdered her? A lot of my family members know that it's possible to be easily convicted of a crime you didn't do in the United States through a jury or a judge.
Nah, 110%.
Guilty till proven not guilty
What a DINGBAT
Ask Amber Frey what she thinks.
She's for the streets. He was stupid to get with her. He has paid severely for his cheating ways and bad taste in women.
Amber Frey has a history of nude photo shoots.
New trail for the Menendez Brothers not Scott P.
EXACTLY! Why waste time and resources on this guy when they deserve to have their case reviewed?
I’ll never contribute to that cause.
Oh remember he told Amber, he lost his wife?? Helloooooooooooooo he is guilty as charged!!
Guys lie when they're cheating on their 8-month's pregnant wife, lady.
@Silence 5:53Thats a big whopper lie though😮😮 _Duder_Gooder
He might be innocent.
@@Student____2025__1 Might doesn't work in the court of law though.
@@lizdahl847 It most certainly does. Scott should walk free if he was wrongly convicted. Shame on all those who jumped to condemn this man before all the evidence was heard.
I AGREE 💯 WE KNOW THE TRUTH. RIP L ACI & CONNOR
“Great hair panel”…. The ONLY thing we can be sure of in this case! 😂 Thank you Jesse Weber AKA Captain of the Great Hair Panel!! 😊❤
But Geraldo is the captain of the hair panel. 😁
Seriously? Next they'll be saying Drew Peterson is innocent.
Or Jodie Arias.... because why not?
It seems to be all about feelings now.n
Or Casey Anthony 😢
Or O. J. @@cherylmilke313
Obviously the LA innocent project does not think he is obviously guilty or they wouldn't be taking the case.
Guilty
I’m innocent
We'll see.
Exactly how did he qualify? Disgusting case. Watch original info on case
Geraldo is a liar too
Ugh IMO he is guilty. But I also have opened my eyes to misconduct etc and IF a retrial finds wrongdoing then let him out. He served time on death row nonetheless bc of that was me and I was innocent/ state can’t prove it then no way should I be in jail. I don’t think he would chance his craziness again. But gosh I loathe him.
If Laci's DNA is on that mattress it's a slam dunk he gets a get out of jail free card.
😂😂😂😂
@@sophie8394 That remark was for especially for Giraldo.
He is guilty af
Please don't use crude expressions on here. Also, Scott Peterson deserves to walk free if he was wrongly convicted.
150% guilty.
I’m surprised that that man Scott Peterson has had managed to survive in CDC system one of toughest systems in the states. He went in with a bad paperwork usually inmates would have take care of inmates with a bad paperwork
Interesting theories, because VERY FEW PRISONERS UNDERSTAND KNOW WHAT RIGHTEOUS ANGER IS, NO DOUBT. Carry on . . .
Lol ... True " dat" @ Jrforeveris
I believe it's because he was on death row for most of it?
He is probably kept away from other inmates.
@@Silence_Duder_GooderI wanted to say that.
Omg the world has gone nuts…Scott Peterson iswhere he belongs
No the world has not gone nuts it's the people in the world.
He's guilty AF...this won't matter, he's not getting out ffs, enough of this garbage.
Awww, they cut Jesse off. What’s up with that?
Love all you guys been waching you guys for years great job guys ❤😊
For once I agree with Geraldo.
Sad ....most of Laci's family have passed away now
Only her father and step.father. Sharon Amy Brent and her many friends are all a live and know he is guilty!
@@patbrown2699 Also Scott mother passed away ,I think.
Guilty.
I’m innocent.
@@Incel_81 So is Hunter, Mendez, Joe, Hillary, Fauci and Fanny.
Love this channel!
Don’t forget all the women who probably visit him
Maybe you are upset because he turned you down for others. But if he's innocent then the man deserves to walk free. If he was wrongly convicted then a correction needs to be made.
I always thought the two burglars who robbed the house across the street that morning did it. In fact, one of them admitted to the murder on a recorded line in jail. But the police “lost the tape.”
Yup, and the innocence project does their homework.
Never happened. Stop making up sh**😮
Lost is a little too kind. I think they call it deep sixed.
Here's a podcast you can watch and listen to. True Crime Matters with Tara Marie. She breaks down in 4 parts the motion that the LAIP presented to the court. It's mostly witnesses. Including declarations from the Medina's. Steve Todd made the mistake of calling Glenn Pearce from the Medina's landline phone on the 24th.
He's INNOCENT.
No
Jmo: innocent people don’t try to disappear they fight for their good name and reputation.
Have you ever heard the story of Dr. Richard Kimble?
@@Silence_Duder_Gooder no I don’t think I have.
@@Kns567, have you ever seen the Harrison Ford movie, "The Fugitive"? Anyway, if you haven't researched the man, do so. See what he did.
@@Kns567 It's based on the case of Sam Sheppard, who was falsely convicted for his pregnant wife's brutal murder in 1954. He was a surgeon, served ten years of his sentence and was finally acquitted when defence attorney F. Lee Bailey took on his case. He had a terrible life after he was released, he volunteered to have live cancer cells injected into him and essentially drank himself to death. He died in 1970 as a result of liver failure. Several members of his family had previously died by suicide after Sheppard was convicted. He was also a wrestler for a brief number of years, but other than that small reprieve, he would never get to enjoy his freedom. A sad case. He never really got free of prison or his tragic life.
Ma'am, not everyone is the same. Scott Peterson deserves to walk free if he was wrongly convicted.
They did Jesse Weber dirty
WHY is every single video on every single platform 4 mins long. This is so annoying. They don't even include everyone's responses in this "interview." Drives me absolutely crazy. I just want to watch the full interviews. This isn't tiktok. Ughhhhh...
Absolutely agree 💯
Anytime someone says Obviously guilty, means we better review it Lol
Geraldo knows all about lying dogs….
How many cement anchors did SP make??
I made a few but they were for something else. I didn’t kill my wife!!!
One.
He made one and then used the rest on his driveway
@@Incel_81 Where is Scott Peterson? Is this the account he is using in jail? Why did the name change?
Maybe Scott was framed.
Did he have enemies who'd care enough to frame him? What could be the motive? Did he cheat at golf and a disgruntled player decided that Scott had putted his last game? lol
Why did Geragos just say yesterday that Scott was NOT going south to Mexico--that he was going NORTH.....????
Like geraldo has credibility lol
He wasn’t on the Mexican border. He was meeting his Dad & brother at a golf course in San Diego. He was arrested at the golf course in San Diego. FACTS.
Geraldo Rivera at 80 years looks better and is sharper than both Donald Trump and Joe Biden.
Show us the reciepts.
Geraldo, if it was a slam dunk why weren't the witness list handed over etc. Blame the prosecutor, he was screwing the lead investigator weirdo
Laci had two ribs fractured at the time of death or shortly thereafter that is not consistent with the whole "soft kill" theory. Her shoulder bone was injured well after death. Then, there is the missing neck, which isn't consistent with any known disarticulation in aqueous environments. How about Laci's uterus that was at least 10 cm smaller than it should have been? So that explains the incision to remove Conner. The injured 9th rib, also postmortemis in the same location where such an incision would have been made. To top it off. Scott couldn't have killed Laci. Conners GA is proof of that. Conner was determined to be alive until Jan 3rd by both the States expert and the Medical examiner? Furthermore, Dr Charles March testified there is no way that Scott and Laci Peterson's unborn baby could have died any earlier than Dec. 29, 2002. Dr Alison Galloway the States own expert and forensic anthropologist, determined the baby could have even been alive as far along as Jan 14th. How is he guilty if Laci was alive after the 24th?
Plenty of incriminating evidence against S Todd and G Pearce existed.
Lt. Aponte gave a signed statement to defense investigators which said the prisoner had been interviewed by MPD, and that MPD had received a copy of the taped phone conversation. Instead of this information being disclosed during discovery. The only information provided to the defense about his tip was a simple notation on a CD which included 10,000 other tips about the case.
-Merlin, the trailing dog owned by Cindee Valentin, trailed Laci's scent to the Gallo Winery in the airport district, on the night of December 26. Not far from the burglars residence.
-December 31, a gold Croton watch, identical to Laci’s watch which disappeared the same day she did, was pawned by Deanna Renfro. Highly unlikely this is just a coincidence.
It gets better. The families of Deanna Renfro, Steven Todd and the Tenbrinks know one another.
-Diane Jackson reported seeing 3 men with a VAN and a SAFE in front of the Medina’s house at 11:40 a.m. on December 24. There is no debating this. The burglary happened the same day Laci disappeared. Both Todd and Pearce pled guilty to burglary charges 12-24-02. They both received reduced sentences.
- S Todd would have received 25 years for his third offense. So why did he get 8 years and 8 months, far less than 25 years. Pearce received only 180 days, yet he was another career criminal.
-Tom Harshman, who lived in Modesto, was driving with Elizabeth Harshman between 2 and 4 p.m. on the afternoon of December 24. He saw a young pregnant woman being forced into a van. He turned around and went back to the spot hoping to find the van still there and hoping to get more information about the license plate number. But they were gone.
1. He called police (911 MPD) that same day.
2. Tried again December 28.
3. December 28, he also called the Laci tip line twice. His first call on this date was listed incorrectly under the name Harsh and was given Bates Stamp number 14789. The call was given to Detective Holmes. Harsh(man) said that he had called 3 or 4 days earlier on the day that he had seen a pregnant young woman being pushed into a van. There had been a man standing over her as she squatted to urinate with her back up against a chain-link fence. The man was described as 30’s, tall, thin, with ponytail, dirty blonde to gray hair, scrubby looking. When she finished, the woman was shepherded back to the driver’s door of the car, where another man’s arm was seen pulling her into the car. He said the young woman was wearing black pants and a red shirt. He said she had a scared look on her face."
4. Jan 3rd, he went to the Command Post in the park and relayed this to the officer on duty. Over
40,000 pages in the discovery and nothing about this report was in it.
5. February 2003, Harshman’s wife spoke to a relative of hers who lived in New York about the sighting of Laci Peterson near the corner of Scenic and Claus. Mrs. Harshman’s relative shared this story with an NYPD detective. This NYPD detective was so concerned that he contacted the MPD and spoke personally to Detective Grogan on February 14, 2003. What did Grogan do with the information? Nothing at all
6. pre-trial hearings in May of 2004, DA Investigator Kevin Bertalotto noticed the Harshman tip and insisted that Grogan call Tom Harshman and speak to him personally. Grogan did this on May 18, 2004.
An audiotape and a transcription of his conversation with Harshman to the defense on May 20, 11 days before the beginning of the trial.
That intrrviewer the other night shpuld have asked him who he thought the real killer was. If they sound robotic computerized and lawyered up that can be revealing. Usually innocent people will express anger thats real toward the person. Like polly klaas father. When they tell who they think did it. Some innocent people though can sound ubaffected and unemotional . Which can be misleading.
He’s probably guilty but if you put Geraldo on your network you have zero credibility as an organization. We were hoping NN would be real news. But it’s turned into mainstream cable crap.
I can't believe you give a platform to Geraldo.. No wonder you can't be taken serious as a "news" outlet.
I agree. That GR is projecting. Let's put it this way. I got his number. I have all their numbers. Fake News. They are not in the pursuit of justice or truth.
News nation is a tabloid entertainment network more than a news network. Just like most American “news” channels
Let’s ask some Hollywood writers if they’d make a movie based on Scott’s story or if they’d pass. My money is on them passing because it’s simply not believable.
Scott Peterson is 💯 guilty for killing Laci and Connor! He went fishing in the bay and her torso washed up on the shoreline and Connors body washed up on the shoreline near his mother's and I have to say that is the first thing that I believe that he is 💯 guilty of killing them both. So I have to agree with Geraldo that Scott Peterson is guilty and he needs to be locked up in prison for what he did to her and the baby.
The female reporter is a disgrace to the profession.
Mr Rivera San Quentin ain't no cushy life...
I used to think SP was 💯 guilty until I watched a documentary that shed light on a few other things. If you really think about it the only reason he was found guilty was because of Amber Frye's testimony there was not a shred of physical evidence. I think had I been a juror I wouldn't have been able to say for sure he was guilty or not guilty. I think everyone wants to just automatically think he's guilty without looking into some other sources, things aren't always what they seem.
Geraldo has been so wrong so many times that I actually kind of want him to get sued into oblivion for this. As a purported “journalist,” if Peterson is exonerated ( a long shot, certainly - but none of us know the exact details of what actually happened - we don’t) he should have Geraldo’s empty wrinkle bag on his mantle.
Either way- this is about as unprofessional as it gets.
*_"he should have Geraldo’s empty wrinkle bag on his mantle."_*
😝😝😝😝😝
I bet he still thinks OJ is guilty too.
Not in San Quentin anymore guys?!?
I like the work the innocence project but this Is making me second guess this organization.
Holy makeup Jesse Webber
Got fired from Fox News...straight to News Nation. Hahaha
This panel of failed talking heads.
They are a bunch of liars. They don't want people to think for themselves. If there is evidence let's have an open mind. The innocence Project took his case.
But you're here watching them
@@SunFlower-sf1go...I do like to watch comedies, and this fits the bill.
Just the fact he was lying to the other woman about not being married, and weird action around Christmas makes no sense saying that he is innocent. Geragos is a classic sleazy lawyer for his angle.
Guilty of an affair doesn't mean he is guilty of a murder. Everything Geraldo said didn't make much sense. Someone taking off doesn't mean they are guilty of a crime either. It was nation wide news. Everyone is going to assume he is guilty no matter what (still do, it's more about feelings than hard evidence). So just because he planned to take off How is that evidence that he murdered her? A lot of my family members know that it's possible to be easily convicted of a crime you didn't do in the United States through a jury or a judge.
@@deegee2416you should just use a different judicial system, like China. Your family wouldn't have much to say about a democratic judicial system with jurors then. 😂
If my husband went missing, I wouldn't lie about my whereabouts. If I went fishing, I'd say so. I wouldn't lie about golfing. I would cry on every news station while I searched night and day for my family. Scott didn't. It's a lot more than an affair. He also told his GF that it was his first Christmas without his family - weeks before Lacy vanished. They weren't even separated. Where had he predicted they'd be December 25th if not around their decorated tree?
@@tishwitch And that's the problem. That is where it all started-that alleged affair. I'm talking about hard evidence. Not subjective feelings on what you think you would have done with or without your husband, or what you would have told who or who not. And how you react to a different situation.
The cops can and will lie. Why would you tell the cops anything you did that day? What's strange is that I knew another guy. When I was not so smart and thought our government did and could do no wrong. They lied, saying that he confessed to murder. It never happened. And when they finally released what he actually said, he said nothing of the sorts. Why would they not want him to have a fair trial? Maybe people have been watching too many Dirty Harry movies. Where people's rights truly don't matter. And the government likes to play hero and tell who can and who won't show up for a jail visit. Is it possible that our government thinks it's okay to lie because they believe the guy doesn't deserve a fair trial? They just don't want to get caught and they think it's justified. Not only they don't want to get caught. They don't want it to end up on the internet to show them in a bad light.
@@deegee2416 why would you tell the cops anything? Because if you're not involved, you're entire focus should be on helping police and the public find your pregnant spouse (and nearly born son). That's why silly. It's to help build an accurate timeline and account of Lacy's day, to find her alive. The cops didn't care about the affair, until it became relevant because HE lied. He could have said nothing. But he chose to lie, he didn't choose quiet. That's why the focus was all over him. And when he "coincidently" lied about fishing where the family's bodies washed up? And he hid a BOAT then fled? That's a circumstantial murder case, and his inevitable conviction.
Unprofessional people. Laughing. Shameful.
NEWSNATION challenge; let us see your worth to challenge the rogue 2020 election...in 3-2-1
Always love to hear from Geraldo. One of our nations best journalists of all time
And he looks great without clothes!
You're joking, right? 😝
Im guessing the innocence project just wants attention 😮
They are doing their job. The IP doesn't need attention. They are a non profit organization that focuses on exonerating wrongly convicted.
Smart mechanic 32
Lol because Geraldo knows. Good grief.
That interviewer the other night shoukd gave asked him whoif they sound vomputerized and robotic. If they sound lawyered up do you believe the real killer was. Sometimes that can be revealing❤
Kuchli 37
Cruel water 13
Cruel part 09
I always thought since day one this man was innocent.
then why did he lie about being in Europe to Amber and said his wife died before it was told to world and the fact he was looking at the ocean - come on
Well you're going to be disappointed then cause he's going nowhere and the Innocence Project will produce zero evidence.
@@cathychase663it's not against the law to lie to his hussy
Baby killer buys a boat weeks before his wife vanishes, he's making homemade cement anchors in the storage unit which they never found, (because they are attached to Lacey at the bottom of the bay) he goes fishing on Christmas Eve all alone 90 miles away while his 8 month pregnant wife is home alone and tells no one, he tells his lover that he's a widow before Lacey even goes missing, he's watching porn the day after she's reported missing, during the vigil for his missing pregnant wife, he's on the phone with is lover pretending to be in Paris. Lets see, what else: he rents a car and goes to the bay to watch the police searches of the water, he sells Lacey's car, he dye's his hair red, he has 15k cash in the car along with zip ties, a shovel, clothing, a map of his lovers house, fake ID's, family member's credit cards and he's arrested on the boarder of Mexico.
@@SunFlower-sf1goyep ! This !!
Sick tiger 92
Inigo Montoya looks old!
Harshman Grogan testimony
GERAGOS: And they have witnessed the incident, and don't know if they have called Modesto PD yet or not, correct?
GROGAN: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay.
JUDGE: Does he say what time of the day that was?
GERAGOS: This was at 10:08?
GROGAN: That would be 10:08 a.m.
GERAGOS: So, at this point, Mr. Harshman has called on the 28th at 6:50 said he saw a woman being forced into a van, gave a description of the van. Then approximately two months later a New York City police detective says, I have talked to, presumably, Harshman's wife who may have witnessed the incident, correct?
GROGAN: Yes. He got the information from a friend of Miss Harshman's, Mr. Harshman's wife, I believe.
GERAGOS: Okay. And specifically you contacted him on May 18th, 2004, correct?
GROGAN: Yes.
GERAGOS: And he, when you contacted him, he told you that the same day he called into the police department. You put it down at 12:28, right?
GROGAN: Yes, based on that tip.
GERAGOS: I don't think you ever saw this. I'm just going to show this to you. When I went through the tip lines, at 14789, it looks like somebody called in, but the name that was written down was Thomas Harsh. Do you see that?
GROGAN: I see it.
GERAGOS: Okay. You hadn't seen that before right now, had you?
GROGAN: No.
GERAGOS: Okay. It says, reporting that three or four days ago he saw a pregnant lady being pushed into a van. Caller given to Detective Holmes. You were not aware that Harsh had indicated that it was three or four days prior to the 28th when he had actually phoned in; isn't that correct?
GROGAN: No, I don't think so.
GERAGOS: Okay. This is the first time that you have seen that, because when the caller, whoever took down the information, they just wrote Harsh as opposed to Harshman, correct?
GROGAN: Correct.
GERAGOS: Okay. And he said that he, specifically, on the same day that he had called in, he had seen a van parked on the south side of Scenic, west of Claus, which he described as a 70s, American-made model, beige in color, correct?
GROGAN: Is that the tip that you are reading from top?
GERAGOS: No. I'm at 4527.
GROGAN: Yes.