Voss shows who is boss | Kangaroos v Lions, 2003 | AAMI Classic Last Two Mins
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 1 май 2018
- The star-studded Lions face the Kangaroos in a frantic finish at Telstra Dome. Both Digby Morrell and Michael Voss have five goals on the board for their respective teams, but the latter has the final say on a remarkable match.
For more video and news as it breaks, head to afl.com.au
Follow us on Instagram: / afl
Like our Facebook page: / afl
Follow us on Twitter: / afl
Add us on Snapchat - aflofficial
Find out where you can watch AFL games here: afl.to/2lm0nog 
Спорт
if he kicked the goal it would've been the best win ever
I bloody love the 03 scoreboard yoooo it's so nice
Lol at how the commentators were going off about the deliberate call. These days, that would be deliberate without doubt, and they would be complaining if it WASN'T penalised. It was quite obviously deliberate to me.
"These days" it would be, but back then deliberate was paid about as much as kicking in danger. I was at this game, I can tell you half the crowd was losing it at that call. And if they weren't, they certainly lost it when that North player did basically the same thing later, to no call. Both Roos and Lions fans didn't know what was going on. Good game, good memories, but how the umpires got off that field unscathed I'll never know..
The rules at the time weren’t the same as now and Scott was seeking to gain ground onto a wing that had Lions on it. If there weren’t any Lions lateral to the centre of the ground on the side Scott kicked the ball, then yes. It would be a free. And even still, umpiring is meant to be consistent, the kick by the Kangaroos a minute later was just as deliberate and not paid. So no consistency. Davey’s push in the back after a mark paid should’ve been a 50m penalty. No reason for any player to push someone after a mark.
But still well fought game by both sides. Especially the Roos to take it up to the greatest side of all time like that 🦁👍🏻
You seem to understand this was decades ago, so I don't understand the point you're making? Yes we know "these days" they pay it.
Point is that decades ago they had the wrong perception of deliberate.
I reckon the siren sounded just before he kicked it!
The game is stopped by the Umpires whistle not the siren
@@aidanfuller5630 why that rule exists I don't know. Such a stupid rule. North Melbourne were robbed of a victory but it was in 03 so ehhhh
I was there at that game
If you go to 4:52 the man up top to the left a bit is my uncle
Wow lots of poor kicks by both sides.
skills across the board in the AFL were pretty average til the late 2000s
@@Dr_Footbrake The media would have you believe skill level is at an all time low
@Soussy *bad defending
@@getyaphinsup well yes . . . That *would* explain why scoring is down significantly despite the skill level across the league being far higher.
LOL Petrie
3:59 Robbins kept his feet he is my dad
Was Drew Petrie on LSD?
2022 AFL is barely watchable these days - a once great game destroyed.
I agree
Sooo many sloppy kicks
You try playing elite footy for 3 hours. I'm sure you'd be a podalic sniper.
How exactly does Voss show he is boss? By kicking a goal after the siren? lol.
By winning a brownlow and 3 premierships in a row.
@@justicedemocrat9357 that would be better reflected in a game where he didn't miss a match winning opportunity
April 12 2003
North Melbourne 16 13 109
Brisbane Lions 16 13 109
87 viewer 3 commenter go swans
Lol lol
Siren clearly went before he kicked it. North robbed of 2 points
The game doesn't stop until the umpire blows the whistle.
@@_tim doesn't matter.
Siren sounds = game over.
@@_tim Wait, really?
@@BadgerFromOz that’s what we were always told to play by. Play to the umpires whistle, they’re the ones controlling the game. Timekeeper may let them know the time has ended but they still have to acknowledge it for the play to stop.
@@BadgerFromOz that’s what we were always told to play by. Play to the umpires whistle, they’re the ones controlling the game. Timekeeper may let them know the time has ended but they still have to acknowledge it for the play to stop.
Extra time? I would have liked to have gotten a winner in Extra Time. A draw is a nothing result for what was such a great game of Aussie Rules football.
But why should two teams get more time to score enough points to win if they couldn't during the time set for a match? Should a close loser be allowed more time to score more because they almost won?
WillTheMallet, you only have to look at the faces of the players after a match has ended in a draw/tie to see that a draw is a nothing result. The players are very puzzled, and don't know whether they should be feeling elated or devastated. Most of those players I reckon would prefer to either win or lose than to guts it out for 120 minutes just to get a nothing result. Playing Extra Time when the scores are level at the end of Regulation Time gives them the opportunity to do just that. It gives the fans the opportunity to come away from the match a lot more satisfied that they were able to see a proper result too. A far better outcome than the nothing result which we get from a tie.
Easily the world’s gayest sport🇬🇧🇬🇧
Not like soccer though huh. Real mans game that one🤫🤫🤫
And soccer isn't
@@truth3092you're right it isn't
Dean Laidley says hi.
Stop using foreigners like voss etc at port..use locals i say.