I don't think I reject Jordan Peterson as a Canadian. I wish he'd go somewhere, sit down, shut up and disappear from the public eye. Also, why is he dressed like he's going to go fight Batman?
Because he knows that Batman's greatest weakness is his psychological damage derived from the loss of his parents. Batman can't attack someone who is simply using words to completely dismantle the mantled Batman who hides his emotional turmoil beneath the cowl.
It's not that JP can't say the hateful things he does, the Canadian court has - the way I see it, at least - ruled that he can't force the association of psychologists to be affiliated with the things he says. JP is just a bit cranky that he can no longer legally pretend his bigoted remarks are in any way professionally endorsed by his peers.
That's extremely fair. My father adores Jordan peterson, and I've listened to everything JP has put out there. I agree with a lot of things, however I disagree with some topics as well. I feel wholeheartedly, blindly agreeing with everything JP says is a slippery slope. It's good to be cautious and skeptical with everything people say.
Precisely. When you cloak yourself in your profession or speak on behalf of that profession, that comes with certain obligations and responsibilities. Now, if I'd been on the licensure board, I would've sanctioned Peterson the moment he started lying about C-16 and trans people and blatantly disregarding all corrections and critiques in that regard. They've been super lenient with him in my book.
@@Victoriaghhlike what do you agree with him? His entire career is just grifting that’s why he works for Daily Wire now because no serious network can put up with his bigotry!
Oh, don't get me wrong. I dispise the hate he has for the lgbt community. That's my largest gripe. I really enjoy his Bible philosophy, even though I'm not religious, I do enjoy learning about religion, and everyone's interpretations.
I study religions of all cultures and found myself really enjoying his historical and religious ramblings. Extremely easy to listen to. I don't find pleasure in his political side.
As a Canadian, I am mandated by tradition to say, "Sorry" for this rapidly deteriorating husk of a mammal. Narcissists are always the Victim or the Hero of their narratives, never the Antagonist.
@@nathanduclos5045 One wonders who these people are. I thought my brother was becoming a soldier in the Peterson army. He read something Peterson wrote twenty years ago. I sent my brother links to videos of Peterson balling his eyes out and my brother was cured!
"Blaming others for your problems is a complete waste of time. When you do that, you don’t learn anything! You can’t grow and you can’t mature." Jordan Peterson
When he used to play hide the ball, he would say, in many ways, politics is an expression of psychology. He sure shows a lot of negative emotion and he seems to have the "axiomatic presupposition" that his negative emotions are justified. "It isn't obvious to me" he's doing "precisely" what he accuses the "radical left" of doing.
I have freedom of speech in America. However, I can not publicly talk about the industry I regulate. Further, I cannot even talk privately about the proprietary information that I know about said industry or its participants. I can quit and blather all I want. I just can't do both. An adequately functioning adult understands this limitation.
@@kaptivatingstudios676 So.. you're not an adequately functioning adult, then? Idk if you know this, but "the invisible hand of the free market" can't do everything. We have laws and regulations to protect businesses and people from bad actors. It's proprietary information; do you know what proprietary means? Because the reason that you wouldn't want that information released is literally build into the definition of the word... so if you understand it, then you should understand why. And if you understand why, I'm not sure why you said "[you] don't see why not" "Shouldn’t you be able to share your opinions about businesses or voice objections or even praise?" That's also not what anyone was talking about. When you purposefully misunderstand/don't understand someone for the sake of making an argument, it makes you look like kinda silly. Do you understand that they're not saying that they're literally not allowed to talk about the industry they regulate in any capacity, at any time, no matter what, no exceptions, not even a single word? Because that'd be nonsensical. I don't even know what industry they're in, but I don't need to in order to know that what they meant is that there are certain things (or categories of things) that they can't talk about. This could be to protect trade secrets, future company plans, classified information [from govt contractors], something simple like employee security, or any number of things I'm not considering. (they'd almost certainly be allowed to praise someone/something related to their industry)
I thought a similar thing when he refused to delete his Twitter post about Elliot page saying he would rather die in his stupid dramatic fashion. His post was against twitters terms of service, terms he agreed to. I would have thought a phd holder would have been able to easily comprehend this. Instead of crying persecution.
Yes, there are limitations on free speech. If you are part of a business deal and you know a stock is about to tank, you can't tell everyone you know it's about to tank so they pull their money from the stock. It's called insider trading and it's illegal. You could argue free speech but insider trading law would supersede it. Peterson's ability to keep his license is predicated on meeting certain professional requirements. If he doesn't want to meet those requirements because he wants to say whatever he wants, then f*cking give up your license, dude. Blame it on the unreasonable academic elites like you always do and f*ck off.
because he is defending the power hierarchies that serve his audience and telling them that they are indeed entitled to run shit and be on top because they inherently deserve to be on top.
A large part is also that he draws on legitimacy from having recently been a clinical psychologist in "good standing." He knows his credentials affect his income and boost his lies.
I thought it was interesting how his daughter was just sitting there, listening - not agreeing, nor asking him for any questions or clarifications. It almost appeared as if he was throwing her a bone to boost her online audience/presence/platform, and at the same time was glad to have a very friendly atmosphere to just say whatever the hell he wanted without any pushback. I feel it honestly reveals a lot about what he feels about himself versus what he knows, deep down, is true. He likely wouldn't have said half the crap he did on some other program. He would have dialed it back, knowing that he would have been called to task by any true "interviewer" or show host (that wasn't his daughter, I mean).
It's hilarious to see wimpy dorks such as him, Shapiro, Walsh, Carlson et. al.try to talk tough,it reminds me of William F. Buckley Jr. threatening Gore Vidal.
his conversation with roger penrose was pretty telling. when he is talking with a person who is truly intelligent and informed you can see him fall apart very quickly.
@@pinksparkle6891 That's what radicals always say. In theory, they are always for freedom. But then the end justifies the means and all of a sudden authoritarian tactics are legit. The catastrophes of the 20th century came into being because of smug people like you, who believed that this time they really knew better that all others.
Did this guy have a "rule for life" about assuming that other people know more than you do? He literally said "I considered maybe I'm wrong and then decided I absolutely know I'm informed then the legal experts who decided my case!" He's like a live example of conservative brain rot
@@perryroberts4353 He wears it to be seen so it's part of it. But sorry. Not beautiful. And no amount of comment defending him is going to change that.
He's like a real life Shakespearean tragedy.. a train wreck that you can't look away from. Dude has been in the most pathetic extended tailspin for years now. It's getting kinda hard to watch honestly lol, I'm a little worried he's going to lose his marbles on air one of these days
Imagine being a trained doctor of psychotherapy and not even knowing enough about commonly prescribed psychoactive medicine to know that Clonazepam is addictive. He doesn't even know about fields that are incredibly tangential and relevant to his own.
"You can't be a psychologist and have a "sorry not sorry" mentality". So true... That's like being a drivers ed instructor and having a drinking problem!
Jordan Peterson's evil villain alias would be Dr. Confusion where he would distract Batman with his endless monologue, talk about his psychological issues regarding his parents, all the while his henchmen would be doing something nefarious elsewhere.
@@sophiophile Oh yes of course. The crying would be on top of everything else to make poor Batman feel even worse for hitting a geriatric old man that is simply using logic and reason to overwhelm his bat senses.
We view people through a glass darkly based on our own biases and experiences, granted, but she's always struck me as someone who has been socialized to use even her own loved ones as ladders to further her own success, and who will devour Daddy's corpse without much sentimentality for the nutrients when the time comes, like an anaconda with perfectly-groomed eyebrows.
@@havefunbesafe , I imagine she loves and idolizes him in her way, but I personally can't imagine an adult child who had genuine empathy, concern, and love for their parent enabling them the way she has, unless she's *truly* as deluded as he is. As it stands, she really does come across to me as using him to launch her own brand.
@@dinosaysrawr Oh, so a woman as maneater. I've never heard that before. Watch out boy, she'll eat you up! And does she have RBF? What's next? Black widow, bombshell, ball and chain..?
I'm quite pro-free speech. But if you use your credentials to legitimize utter bullshit in your own field of study which harms people that is malpractice and your credentials should be taken away.
I used to be woot woot free speech but these right wingers stirring up such a moral panic against LGBTQ and BLM groups the last few years has me convinced that the government has a duty to protect vulnerable groups from hate mobs and lone wolf extremist attacks. It’s not hard to see the internet haters are directing the crazies to lash out.. how many shootings end with the FBI combing through their search history to find Shapiro, Tim pool, Matt Walsh, Libs of Tic Toc before we see what is right in front of our faces.. it’s exactly what isis was doing with terrorism.. hate preaching needs to be stopped. They are directing the attacks pretty much.
@@Jack-hv3uj thank you, for once, someone with actual common sense and critical thinking. Carl Jung once said "thinking is hard, so most people judge" and when you look at it nowadays most of these podcasts aint about critical thinking, they just about perpetuating judgement in the form of "reacting to so and so's online breakdown"
What kind of things has JP said that is utter bullshit? What has he said that is complete bs because the stuff I’ve heard him say so far has been pretty much true.
Healthcare professionals have to practice according to a Code of Ethics. We all have them. If you don’t practice accordingly you can lose your license. He should just give up his license if he can’t act like a professional. I just scanned his code of ethics. He went against a few requirements. The worst is slurring those physicians. That’s a no no. If they think a professional is doing anything unethical they can not broadcast it. They are allowed to talk with the other professional but they can’t broadcast it. And the way he treats others is definitely enough to get his license revoked.
I think the issue here is that his own profession is captured by 'trans' ideology. England, Sweden, and Finland have all done systematic reviews of the evidence and found no evidence for 'transitioning' minors and that the harm it has caused is not justifiable. And France, Norway, and Denmark are also putting the brakes on these medical interventions. The suicide rate is x19 higher post-transition and often occurs w/i 5-10 yrs after transition. The 'trans' agenda is promoted primarily by wealthy, male, heterosexual cross-dresser sexual fetishists, autogynephiles/transvestic fetishists. (To follow the money see The 11th Hour Blog). Men who often have other paraphilias. These men invade women's single-sex spaces and supplant women's and LGB's sex-based rights--including women's sports. Most of these men are genitally-intact. And they promote mutilating 'transitioning' of minors that is not justified by the evidence. Many of these minors are just gay or lesbian who are 'sex lobotomized' by the 'gay conversion therapy' of 'transitioning.' 'Transgenderism' is misogynist and homophobic to its core. It is a medical scandal that I hope results in more legislation banning it and lawsuits that will curtail it. See reduxxdotinfo and the IEA interview w/ Helen Joyce, author of 'Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality' to understand what 'trans' 'gender identity' is really about. See Women's Liberation Front and LGB Alliance, LGB United, Women's Declaration International USA. These are liberal orgs. that are women's rights advocate and for same-sex attracted men and women (LGB).
Every professional is required to be "re-educated". It's called Continuing Professional Development. In fact Professional Ethics is a mandatory component of CPD.
Any American psych org will gladly license him. We believe in freedom and truth unlike the nazi fascists. At least the sane one here that aren't brainwashed by the alphabet cult.
@@BDub2024 I'm not Canadian, but my feeling is that pretty much nothing that he says is based in any fact or even honest reason. The Canadian law that he complains "compels speech" just plain doesn't. To say so is like saying the 2d amendment to the US Constitution MANDATES that all Americans must have guns, it just doesn't say that. Then he goes on to talk about how certain surgeons are "butchers" because they perform gender reassignment surgery, which would apply equally to any surgeon, especially those who perform any elective surgery whatsoever, cosmetic surgery, breast enhancement, anything really. Former Trump spokesperson Kaley McEnany had an elective radical mastectomy because her mother had breast cancer and she tested positive for genetic markers. Was her surgeon a "butcher" for "hacking off" (terminology Peterson has actually used in discussion) her healthy breasts? What about the children? Children mostly can't get ANY surgery on their own, parental consent is mostly required, and that goes for gender reassignment surgery, which is so rarely performed on minors it's fair to say it isn't. So that's just a red herring. But what about breast surgery on teenage girls? That also requires consent, but usually it's a case of breast reduction where a girl's breasts come in uncomfortably large, or they have breast cancer, or they are getting enhancement, which Jordan doesn't complain about. Bottom line: nobody is being "butchered", least of all kids, it just isn't happening. This goes into politics where he excoriates anyone with ideas that don't fit a very narrow conservative orthodoxy, as crazed marxists and communists, which is plain ludicrous. Joe Biden is ideologically much closer to conservative than he is to socialist, and communism hasn't even entered the chat. But all that he talks about are evil leftists and cultural marxists, bogeymen he makes up clearly to suit an agenda. So his penchant for hyperbolic rhetoric seems quite purposeful, more like he's trying to ACHIEVE something than simply express himself, and that's called "politics", not honest expression or debate. So while I agree that intelligent discussion is critical, I disagree that Jordan participates in it. I would welcome him to participate in a genuine dialogue, but he seems to have abandoned that for a much more pragmatic path. His preference toward extreme rhetorical exaggeration just makes him seem like an erratic madman. That's what I think anyway.
@@BDub2024 Surely you realize the flaw in your reasoning? Children need surgery the same as anyone else: to save their lives. Kids need heart surgery, they need to have a burst appendix removed. But it's always sunny with parental consent or in lieu of that, court consent when the parent is not available or not capable. Surgery on children is not happening outside these strictures Society should surely protect the young and the weak, that's a given, and we do. I don't see what the argument is here.
JP is soooo close to getting it when he explains it. He factually lays it out that a professional organization has rules against what he does and then is confused by it. He has such a strong moral high ground on the wrong side of things. My dude, just rescind your membership and grift in peace.
@@BeverlySummers10 . Exactly. You don't know the rule. And neither does Ontario College of Psychologists. Nor does Jordan. Only fascists dis-bar professionals for being "disrespectful" of politicians.
@@The_Vitruvian if it was just his comments about politicians, you would have a point and I’d be inclined to agree. However, in his case, it might be all the other, not politically centric, hateful crap he said that’s getting him into trouble.
I wish that David would have pointed out the other glaring fact about how disingenuous Jordan is being. This is a provincial certification and the Ontario government is currently a right wing party. Blaming the federal government for this is obviously disingenuous and Jordan knows that. Nothing but grift.
Absolutely, he knows he's wrong but like a spoiled child cannot accept the reality of the situation. He has to make a choice, be a doctor or be a blowhard.
Is the College even a government entity? I'd be interested to know if professional licensing bodies are actually part of government. I know they are usually formed under a provincial act but are they actually part of government? Now I'm genuinely curious.
@@Happytravellerkimmydoes it need to be? If Peterson signed to a code of ethics, then its similar with bringing any other profession into disrepute, from doctors, to engineering and football players.
Remember that part in 1984, where Winston got kicked out of the yact club because he wouldn't stop pooping his pants. This is just like that, it really makes you think.
Canadian here, and I think David here is the closest thing to a left-wing reactionary new media has. He's audience captured much like Tim Pool and others, only from a deeply left-wing perspective.
right, that would be left wing loons. Forcing people to use specific speech is a violation of freedom of speech but Justine Trudeau doesn't care if her country is a totalitarian kingdom.
He also cries...like a lot...and according to "Alpha Males", crying is a sign of a weak male. JBP basically cannot fit into the rigid standards he set for himself.
I have a friend that just entered his second year of college. And he had been to a JP lecture and had taken notes. That utterly terrified me that this lunatic is touring college campuses speaking to college students and spreading his brand if cancer for a profit.
@@adamp108I'd love to see those notes to see how incoherent, meandering psychobabble can be translated into somethig meaningful. In my ed. psychology 401 class,years ago, the easiest way to get an "A" was to go on a "retreat" and blow the prof or be a big suck-up if you were a guy - no lie.
How is JP a lunatic?! There are tens of millions of people who disagree with you are they 'lunatics' as well!? JP given MILLIONS of people a purpose in life and is in my opinion one of the greatest men of our generation, calling JP a lunatic is a spit in the face to the millions who love him.
As a Canadian, I can say for all of us that we are happy to take Jordan Peterson back to our land. …our large, mostly unpopulated and entirely internet-free land. I’m certain that we can house him somewhere that would befit his unique perspective.
I'm surprised he hasn't been taken to court for revealing the complainants personal information over twitter when he posted the notice the college of psychologists had sent him. He or someone on his staff had used the shape tool in acrobat to black out name, addresses, telephone numbers and emails but all you had to do was open the document in a pdf editor and delete the boxes to see the info.
To my opinion it is not a problem that he developed this "tv personality". The problem is that he insists that it is legit psychology. In my opinion, he engages in mental pornography, so it should be mentioned at the beginning of each of his programs.
@@runnermcturtle5893 Mental pornography? I don't think anyone gets addicted or captivated by his lectures even though he says some good things here and there and may motivate some people. Bit of a weird comparison lol
16:33 I’ve been thinking this every time she's onscreen, but the way you can see his daughter's soul just leave her body and almost hear her inner monologue of “I wonder when he'll finally run out of gas” will never stop being funny to me. Like you know that woman has sat through thousands of these rants at the family dinner table.
Peterson stuck in his own hero journey at the 'Goddess' phase, trapped by motherly support of wife and daughter, Anima issues in obsession with female body dysphoria. Carl Jung would have a field day.
He strikes me as the type who sits silently at family meals, inviting his family, to do all the talking, thereby allowing him to sit in silence judgment.
As a psychologist, he must know that overcoming the biological will to live, letting go of one's multiple attachments to life as well as to loved one's, is no painless, easy or simple task and that it would take a whole lot of mental courage and guts (not to mention, a whole lot of unresolvable subjective angst and suffering or a complete loss of hope) to even begin to overcome those factors and consider a self-exit, even if one were faced with an incurable terminal illness. How can he not know this as a psychologist, let alone ask someone to just "go do it" when any DIY option is far from easy or simple? No one should be asking anyone to go _-I-L-L themselves. Period. Especially not a psychologist. The reason programs like MAID are there, is to provide people with the right to choose a voluntary, painless, guaranteed, peaceful and compassionate exit from life, at a time of their choosing, where they can find closure with loved ones, say their goodbyes and so that they don't have to resort to ill-reasoned or gruesome and painful methods of self exiting. There is no peaceful DIY method available to most people on this planet and he ought to know this as a psychologist. What if one of his patients was someone that was dealing with a terminal condition, terrible unresolvable suffering, nearing end of life and was asking for the means to a peaceful exit? Would he ask them to go just go _I-L-L themselves!? What kind of psychologist doesn't understand the actual logistics of a DIY exit? He really should NOT be asking ANYONE to "just go _I-L-L themselves"! and definitely not in a kermit-like voice.
Your argument is ridiculous. Everything you say about suicide is correct and tragic. He was pointing out the hypocrisy of the person's comment about population, which is the hypocrisy outlined by the [working class] philosopher Professor Scruton about privileged left wing people: everyone must not live/spend their money BUT NOT ME. That is what Peterson was pointing out. He was not encouraging that person to top themselves, so your argument is disingenuous.
@@sarahdlp524 No actually it is not. Certain ideologically, religiously or politically motivated people (not all, but some) seem to say this very thing, as if it’s some sort of a “rebuttal” to the topics that they are ideologically opposed to. It seems like they say this sort of thing during arguments about climate change, population (I guess… as you pointed out), or on topics like MAID, etc., etc. Maybe it’s a knee jerk reaction to positions they don’t agree with on an ideological basis, but as a psychologist, he ought to know better than to say it in the first place to anyone at all, regardless of their political orientation, their beliefs, etc. Really no one should be saying this to anyone else for any reason at all. Period. I mean, he’s a clinical psychologist! I don’t hate him (or anyone for that matter), I just disagree with him. Just because I disagree with someone, doesn’t mean that I must hate them. The fact is that there are many ways to point out to someone that they are being hypocritical on any topic WITHOUT resorting to telling them that they could or should just go commit su-i___ as an ideologically motivated rebuttal. Given the very fact that actually doing so, in practical terms, is neither easy nor painless at all. It’s a callous thing for a psychologist to be saying. That’s the point. There is no painless, guaranteed, peaceful off-switch. He ought to know that as a psychologist, but he tends to say it nevertheless, as a so-called “rebuttal”. This is a common ideologically motivated retort by some, but should not be used as a retort at all. That’s the point. I hope that makes more sense. Look, I have empathy and love for him as a person, despite disagreeing with him on many topics, knowing that he has been through a lot of suffering in his life, like any other person on this planet. But I don’t think anyone should use this as some kind of a “rebuttal” or comeback. No one that wishes to live, should be asked to “go _ILL themselves. It should not be said as a rebuttal and not even as a joke. That’s the point. He’s a clinical psychologist!
Exactly! They weren’t restricting his right to express political opinions, they were saying his tweets were unprofessional and degrading. There’s a huge difference.
For me it was the trucker strike that did it. Anyone who comes out against labor - for me - is significantly disassociated from reality. He is an academic - and everything revolves around "HIS" superior intellect.
I won't claim to have a good idea of what she used to look like, but will offer that I didn't recognize her until someone mentioned who Peterson was talking to.
Her face looks stiff and painful from all the botox. Well shes a rude person anyway now her face matches the inside. And the Michael Jackson nose = uncanny valley vibes
I think the Rational National is assigning too kuch intelligence to JP. Yes, this is a transparent grift, but Peterson is also a deeply unwell man and always has been even before the medically-induced coma. Dude is genuinely insane, but also a grifter.
He's insane, I honestly don't know how expect to not get in shit and post misinformation as a PSYCHOLOGIST. Like wtf does he think that they were gonna do. It's dangerous especially as someone with a psychology title.
@@legendzero9000 curiosity for posterity's sake. You're all watching the cult of personality. He got respect. He got a following. He got a whole lot of money. It changed him.
He walked away from his practice and hopped onto the right wing gravy train many years ago. He only uses the title to add some intellectual veneer to his reactionary bigotry.
@@steven5054 What exactly are you driving at? Is your entire basis for this stance simply your disagreement? Reflect on the fact that this situation could impact you or someone you align with, potentially silencing discussions on societal matters. Keep in mind that he frequently echoes the majority's viewpoints. Stripping a professional's license carries immense weight, regardless of patient interaction. It's meant to remain apolitical, yet the court's disposition appears to contradict that principle. It’s mind bugling and will cause a chilling effect
As another Canadian I have always found Peterson pompous, arrogant and in love with the sound of his own voice and the belief in the superiority of his intellect, and like many professions there are rules you need to follow if you want speak in a capacity that doesn't follow the rules that everyone must adhere to if you want to remain a professional who belongs to it, at least he didn't start to cry even though he does a lot of whining
@@buddyguy4723what's the definition of a man ? I mean that's a whishy washy question that's dressed up to look like a gotcha question. It means different things to different people. I know women with out a uterus doesn't mean they arnt women . Just a thinly valed attempt to cover their hate grift .
@@itcouldbelupus2842 How does your response do the work of convincing me to shift my view? I have educated myself on this issue, it's precisely BECAUSE I have educated myself on this issue that I have the view that I do. Condescending to people doesn't actually persuade them of anything. Moreover, the view that "you can't question X if you don't know anything about X...", questioning can be and often is the first step to understanding. What a silly comment you've made.
@@cleomenes01 You don't want to be convinced and I'm not trying to convince you, I already know for a fact that you gave not educated yourself on this topic, you've obviously learned everything you know about the subject from dishonest conservative political pundits. Which means you're either very gullible, willfully ignorant or dishonest yourself. Doesn't matter how eloquent I am, nothing I say will change your mind, no amount of facts will change your mind. Conservatives only change their mind when they have enough personal experiences that force them to face their cognitive dissonance and consider rethinking Their original positions. Conservative only care about their feelings, not facts.
As it is, no one takes him seriously or should, but that suit...smh. Auditioning to be a villian in the next DC universe film? I hope his daughter breaks away from her insane dad & makes a better life for herself. Run now!
She is an adult now, if she hasn't run from him, she's won't. Unfortunately, most of the damage to her has already been done while growing up. She herself has mental health issues and is promoting pseudo-science. She put JBP on an all-meat diet, which I'd argue really harmed him. When you spend so much time with toxic people, you don't see the toxicity inherent in their environment.
Also we do not have a constitution we have a charter. It is different because it is a different country. If you are going to talk about a different country the basic is to look at the rules of that country.
Yeah, what a fool for thinking he has the right to free speech, and for making an attempt to fight for that right on behalf of all Canadians. He's just not as smart as you, I guess.
his little moment of clarity before doubling down literally doing the "no, its the kids who are wrong" meme but about the law and a judge is sending me
Are we not going to talk about the strange suit he’s wearing?! 😂 btw, I’m a LCSW/therapist. When we acquire our licensure, we are bound by the ethics board that we acquired said licensure from. When he decided to go against that code of ethics, he also decided to give up his licensure, and if something were taught about an undergraduate, graduate school and PhD programs all over not just the United States but the world.
There is _no way_ he got to where he is without knowing the ethical requirements of his profession or its governing body. He's loving this martyrdom bullshit and taking advantage of his followers' ignorance.
Which specific ethical requirements did he violate in his conduct? And also, do these specific ethical requirements extend beyond his practice as a clinical psychologist into his personal life and opinions?
As a Canadian, I can say that I don't agree with all of Peterson's views and current platform on Ben Shapiro's network. I don't agree with him platforming Netanyahu and other US conservatives. However, I do like Peterson's position on Canada's PM Justin Trudeau and a lot of what he wrote in his Rules of Life book. Some useful things in there. He offers a unique perspective on the cult of wokeness. I think what Ema and other libs try to do is basically say EVERYTHING he says is wrong.
@@soulknife20 "Unique" in that its from a psychological point of view. Most won't comment or voice their opinion on it because of the repercussions. But having multiple genders and forcing people to use pronouns is a cult.
I love how all the freaks come out of the woodwork when someone agrees with Peterson on something. Libs and wokesters are desperate to shut down any criticism on pronouns. @@kevinskiles2033
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
Jordan Peterson isn't the victim. The victim is anyone who is subjected to his whiny-ass hot takes.
...his voice.
@@lamontcranston3177 Yes, his voice makes his unbelievably horrific takes even worse.
if he stuck to his ass rather than his mouth he would make a lot more sense
in this case his daughter. But i'm pretty sure she legit almost killed him back during covid so probably couldn't happen to a better victim
Over your head is it?
I don't think I reject Jordan Peterson as a Canadian. I wish he'd go somewhere, sit down, shut up and disappear from the public eye. Also, why is he dressed like he's going to go fight Batman?
Because he knows that Batman's greatest weakness is his psychological damage derived from the loss of his parents.
Batman can't attack someone who is simply using words to completely dismantle the mantled Batman who hides his emotional turmoil beneath the cowl.
He is dressed like a gay version of the Riddler
@@dustinsindledecker154 You should call him a trans version of the Riddler to really piss him off.
Dressing like a 90s cartoon villain is doing wonders for his brand
It looks like he has a side gig as a Ringmaster at a down-at-the-heels, second-rate traveling circus.
He's worth $10M and has 8.3M followers.
@@BAsed_AFro You're mistaking wealth with something here...what is it though?
@@Documentary81 And how many covid jabs have you had so far there?
@@BAsed_AFro I had two personally.
It's not that JP can't say the hateful things he does, the Canadian court has - the way I see it, at least - ruled that he can't force the association of psychologists to be affiliated with the things he says. JP is just a bit cranky that he can no longer legally pretend his bigoted remarks are in any way professionally endorsed by his peers.
That's extremely fair. My father adores Jordan peterson, and I've listened to everything JP has put out there. I agree with a lot of things, however I disagree with some topics as well. I feel wholeheartedly, blindly agreeing with everything JP says is a slippery slope. It's good to be cautious and skeptical with everything people say.
Precisely. When you cloak yourself in your profession or speak on behalf of that profession, that comes with certain obligations and responsibilities.
Now, if I'd been on the licensure board, I would've sanctioned Peterson the moment he started lying about C-16 and trans people and blatantly disregarding all corrections and critiques in that regard. They've been super lenient with him in my book.
@@Victoriaghhlike what do you agree with him? His entire career is just grifting that’s why he works for Daily Wire now because no serious network can put up with his bigotry!
Oh, don't get me wrong. I dispise the hate he has for the lgbt community. That's my largest gripe. I really enjoy his Bible philosophy, even though I'm not religious, I do enjoy learning about religion, and everyone's interpretations.
I study religions of all cultures and found myself really enjoying his historical and religious ramblings. Extremely easy to listen to. I don't find pleasure in his political side.
As a Canadian, I am mandated by tradition to say, "Sorry" for this rapidly deteriorating husk of a mammal.
Narcissists are always the Victim or the Hero of their narratives, never the Antagonist.
also Canadian, and my boss worships this guy, its so stupid to think hes smart
Peterson has lost the plot. Very normal but engaging too!
As a fellow Canadian, I can say I support Jordan Peterson to his right of free speech.
@@stephenjohnson2236 Not about "free speech" and you are NOT Canadian.
@@nathanduclos5045 One wonders who these people are. I thought my brother was becoming a soldier in the Peterson army. He read something Peterson wrote twenty years ago. I sent my brother links to videos of Peterson balling his eyes out and my brother was cured!
It boggles my mind that there are people taking life advice from such a fragile, angry, bitter person
It boggles my mind that there are people taking life advice from a guy dressed like a 1960s Batman villain.
Have to agree with you there. WTF is up with that jacket?@@atalcot1
Sam Seder fragile angry bitter?
@@oatnoid😂😂😂😂 GOBSHITE!!!
He’s the Incel King. They love him. He agrees women should be subordinate to men.
Peterson ACTUALLY turning into a Batman villain is insaaane
A Batman villain from the old Adam West show from the 1960s. And somehow more ridiculous than King Tut.
Red Skull? I thought that was a Captain America villain, not Batman
@@thirdlegstalliano It was, I was just referring to his suit looking like two face/joker
@@worst00oo00 as long as he ends up beaten into a coma into Arkham asylum
No surprise the incel school-shooters love him.
"Blaming others for your problems is a complete waste of time. When you do that, you don’t learn anything! You can’t grow and you can’t mature." Jordan Peterson
Zinger.... 💯👏👏👏
how long until someone makes a "jordan peterson vs jordan peterson" video highlighting all the times he has been ignoring his own past advice
@@rishabhanand4973 “Inopportune questioning can confuse without enlightening.” Jordan Peterson
These people's claims are idealogical insanity, they are taking everything out of context just like the college of psychologists
When he used to play hide the ball, he would say, in many ways, politics is an expression of psychology. He sure shows a lot of negative emotion and he seems to have the "axiomatic presupposition" that his negative emotions are justified. "It isn't obvious to me" he's doing "precisely" what he accuses the "radical left" of doing.
Jordan Peterson is a case study in the dangers of taking yourself too seriously. The man has become a parody of himself.
Worse than parody. Parody yes but also he has destroyed anything good he has done and lost his credibility. It is a sad sight!!!!
@@opinion4755 I guess speaking the truth is destructive.
Kermit the Fraud
@@Lerian_V No.
Believing oneself to know the _whole_ truth is destructive.
@@Lerian_V He's just whining like a baby that can't get his way, it has nothing to do with truth.
I asked a friend of mine, a working Professor at a Canadian University, what academics thought of Jordan Petersen. He replied, “We don’t”.
For years, as a nurse, I had to sign a Christian morality clause to work at a local hospital. Have my free speech rights been violated?
Your freedom of religion probably has…
what is a Christian morality clause?
@@dco1487”I won’t provide care to those dirty gays, or anyone I don’t believe in.”
Yes
Honestly, probably. Bit that is far from being a doctor and saying that other professionals are monsters and should be killed.
I have freedom of speech in America. However, I can not publicly talk about the industry I regulate. Further, I cannot even talk privately about the proprietary information that I know about said industry or its participants. I can quit and blather all I want. I just can't do both. An adequately functioning adult understands this limitation.
I don’t see why not. Shouldn’t you be able to share your opinions about businesses or voice objections or even praise?
@@kaptivatingstudios676 So.. you're not an adequately functioning adult, then?
Idk if you know this, but "the invisible hand of the free market" can't do everything. We have laws and regulations to protect businesses and people from bad actors. It's proprietary information; do you know what proprietary means? Because the reason that you wouldn't want that information released is literally build into the definition of the word... so if you understand it, then you should understand why. And if you understand why, I'm not sure why you said "[you] don't see why not"
"Shouldn’t you be able to share your opinions about businesses or voice objections or even praise?"
That's also not what anyone was talking about. When you purposefully misunderstand/don't understand someone for the sake of making an argument, it makes you look like kinda silly. Do you understand that they're not saying that they're literally not allowed to talk about the industry they regulate in any capacity, at any time, no matter what, no exceptions, not even a single word? Because that'd be nonsensical. I don't even know what industry they're in, but I don't need to in order to know that what they meant is that there are certain things (or categories of things) that they can't talk about. This could be to protect trade secrets, future company plans, classified information [from govt contractors], something simple like employee security, or any number of things I'm not considering.
(they'd almost certainly be allowed to praise someone/something related to their industry)
I thought a similar thing when he refused to delete his Twitter post about Elliot page saying he would rather die in his stupid dramatic fashion. His post was against twitters terms of service, terms he agreed to. I would have thought a phd holder would have been able to easily comprehend this. Instead of crying persecution.
You absolutely can . What are you talking about. Is very, very little things that you can do .
Yes, there are limitations on free speech. If you are part of a business deal and you know a stock is about to tank, you can't tell everyone you know it's about to tank so they pull their money from the stock. It's called insider trading and it's illegal. You could argue free speech but insider trading law would supersede it. Peterson's ability to keep his license is predicated on meeting certain professional requirements. If he doesn't want to meet those requirements because he wants to say whatever he wants, then f*cking give up your license, dude. Blame it on the unreasonable academic elites like you always do and f*ck off.
Why does anyone take him seriously
Because he makes MAGAts feel good about themselves.
because he is defending the power hierarchies that serve his audience and telling them that they are indeed entitled to run shit and be on top because they inherently deserve to be on top.
A large part is also that he draws on legitimacy from having recently been a clinical psychologist in "good standing." He knows his credentials affect his income and boost his lies.
Because life gets difficult at times and everyone needs a strong daddy now and again.
Of course only people who think and try to understand take him seriously. Parrots like yourself can't understand that.
I thought it was interesting how his daughter was just sitting there, listening - not agreeing, nor asking him for any questions or clarifications. It almost appeared as if he was throwing her a bone to boost her online audience/presence/platform, and at the same time was glad to have a very friendly atmosphere to just say whatever the hell he wanted without any pushback. I feel it honestly reveals a lot about what he feels about himself versus what he knows, deep down, is true. He likely wouldn't have said half the crap he did on some other program. He would have dialed it back, knowing that he would have been called to task by any true "interviewer" or show host (that wasn't his daughter, I mean).
A symbiotic relationship defined.
She's enabling him. It's the typical dysfunctional narcissistic family unit
The funniest moment was when he yelled "BRING IT ON!!!"
What a dork lmao
It's hilarious to see wimpy dorks such as him, Shapiro, Walsh, Carlson et. al.try to talk tough,it reminds me of William F. Buckley Jr. threatening Gore Vidal.
He appears to believe that no one anywhere knows more than he does.
As all narcissists do.
He seems to believe ethics don't apply to him.
Delusions of grandeur? Bipolar?
@@TheDivayentaA little bit of both, perhaps.
his conversation with roger penrose was pretty telling. when he is talking with a person who is truly intelligent and informed you can see him fall apart very quickly.
Just revoke the license.
The odds of him becoming less insane are pretty low.
You shouldn't be able to take away a persons credentials. Just because you don´t like his opinion.
@@poopoppyIt’s beyond a mere opinion at this point. If you can call discrimination and bigotry an “opinion” it’s an issue.
@@poopoppy you should absolutely be able to take away someone's credentials. Like when a doctor commits malpractice or a lawyer.
@@pinksparkle6891 That's what radicals always say. In theory, they are always for freedom. But then the end justifies the means and all of a sudden authoritarian tactics are legit. The catastrophes of the 20th century came into being because of smug people like you, who believed that this time they really knew better that all others.
@@catStone92 He said clearly "Just because you don´t like his opinion", nothing about malpractice.
Did this guy have a "rule for life" about assuming that other people know more than you do? He literally said "I considered maybe I'm wrong and then decided I absolutely know I'm informed then the legal experts who decided my case!" He's like a live example of conservative brain rot
He seriously is the epitome of brain rot
Well, considering some of his advice is "clean your room" and "don't lie" I imagine the subtitle for his books is "...For Thee, Not for Me."
The source of so much of his ideology is “I thought really hard about this and came to X conclusion.” No actual facts.
@@SgtWicket the source of Jordan Petersons ideology is largely Christian nationalism
He's a narcissist who thinks he's exempt from the rules that guide everyone else.
😂😂😂 i love how he wrote his name on his clown suit so he didnt forget whos it was.
It's layers of irony that I'm sure he doesn't get. It's a joker suit, if the joker was completely clueless.
@@raincadeifythe Emperor with new clothes on.
Fool, joker: someone who has the courage to speak power to the kin.@@edp3202
The Benzos definitely did something to his brain. He clearly can’t control his emotions like a normal adult
My young daughter just said that Jordan Peterson’s suit is “Ronald McDonald Goes to the Met Gala.”
I showed it to her because she loves fashion.
Only my sweet Peewee could pull off that jacket!RIP😢
And that is what you think this story is about?
@@perryroberts4353 He wears it to be seen so it's part of it. But sorry. Not beautiful. And no amount of comment defending him is going to change that.
@@spacecat6022😂
@@spacecat6022 Tell your young brother that his opinion has changed my view and now I see that Jordan Peterson is a dumb dumb
Why is it the people who yell about "free speech'' have absolutely no idea how it works?
They often do, which makes their behavior even worse.
ALWAYS!!! Never fails. 😂
Because to them free speech is just a buzzword
Free speech to them is never being criticized for saying something stupid.
How does free speech work in your view then? Genuinely curious
There's something about Jordan Peterson that is profoundly funny to me.
I'm concerned for any person who doesn't think he's funny tbh
Is it his funny sounding voice
He's like a real life Shakespearean tragedy.. a train wreck that you can't look away from. Dude has been in the most pathetic extended tailspin for years now. It's getting kinda hard to watch honestly lol, I'm a little worried he's going to lose his marbles on air one of these days
it's not his circus director outfit, that's actually kinda sad.
@@jojomang8333
Says the 9 to 5 rando with average wage who NOBODY takes seriously in his own life 😂
Jordan Peterson appeared on the show wearing a clown suit so there would be no misunderstanding.
I love when someone speaks out against the queer community while wearing the gayest looking suit in the universe. Quite dandy actually.
Jordan Peterson is proof that being an expert in one field doesn't make you an expert in anything else.
Imagine being a trained doctor of psychotherapy and not even knowing enough about commonly prescribed psychoactive medicine to know that Clonazepam is addictive. He doesn't even know about fields that are incredibly tangential and relevant to his own.
If his license is now in question that would mean that he is not even an expert on the field he claims.
Imagine being an expert in room cleaning, while having empty pill bottles scattered on the floor of your room!
I wouldn't even call him an expert in psychology.
He's also the worst psychologist have ever seen and heard, and I've seen a lot, lol! Also, kinda studying it myself too, but nevermind! 😉
He literally designed himself a suit, signed it, and made his daughter platform him...😂 I'm embarrassed for her.
That's why I like to call him J. Peterman. I bet he was wearing his Himalayan walking shoes as well
It looks like Reyholms suit in the IT crowd 😂
The high opinion he has of that logo as some work of genius is embarrassing to begin with.
Looks like Ronald McDonald became an N7
Or maybe more like Shadow the Hedgehog ----ed Ronald sideways
@@thirdlegstalliano He should be wearing an Urban Sombrero.
It is amazing how far free speech warriors will take it. He literally is lying about people who should be suing him for defamation.
Let's start calling them what they are... free speech terrorists
i'm guessing peterson has never been to jail for this kind of reaction to social media course LOL
Who did he lie about?
@@alwaysovercomingbear4809 for one he’s literally lying about the college of psychologists which allows him to practice lmao
@alwaysovercomingbear4809 Whenever you call somebody criminals Who have not even been charged with a crime that's called defamation
Emma’s impression is hilarious combined with her “re-education camp” 😂 line 😂😂😂
Sometimes I just need to hear from a woman with a sharp brain and a command of the language calling the mindfuck of the patriarchy.
Brutal and I loved it! 🤣
An absolute disgrace with no accountability. No one made him become a clinical psychologist and assume the responsibilites that come with it.
At this point it’s not a nervous break down it’s just shitty behavior. When are we going to stop making excuses for these people?
It can be both. Guy clearly has mental health issues. Doesn’t mean he isn’t a piece of shit.
When are we going to admit that it can be both at the same time. He’s not right in the head plus he’s a shitty person.
It's also ableist
Which unfortunately folks haven't realized sabotages progress in this fight.
@@Talentedtadpole do you mean that calling it a nervous breakdown is ableist?
@@Talentedtadpole it’s not ableist to see that someone with clear mental issues is also a terrible person.
JP is a very sick man
"You can't be a psychologist and have a "sorry not sorry" mentality". So true... That's like being a drivers ed instructor and having a drinking problem!
*drinking opportunity
Dude is looking more and more like a Batman villain every day.
In real estate I’m required to take online classes every 4 years to keep my license. Will the oppression never end?
Why is his Daughter even in the video with him? He doesn’t let her speak.
enabler , also she's in it for the cash, likely doesn't give a damn about anything else
Jordan Peterson's evil villain alias would be Dr. Confusion where he would distract Batman with his endless monologue, talk about his psychological issues regarding his parents, all the while his henchmen would be doing something nefarious elsewhere.
Don't forget the crying.
@@sophiophile Oh yes of course. The crying would be on top of everything else to make poor Batman feel even worse for hitting a geriatric old man that is simply using logic and reason to overwhelm his bat senses.
He would make a great WWE villian
He's giving Riddler vibes.
@@MSCCABut Riddler is not a Fascist 😂
It must be so hard being victimised while making millions of dolars. No wonder he cries so much.
He can buy so many Stalin portraits now.
😂
He's the intellectual jessie smollet. Some blue hairs beat him up during his lectures. Poor guy can't recycle 50s paranoia without pushback
@@robertredmon5409 There's a reason that people call the cultist stupid. Thanks for the example.
i guess cancel culture is just lets make someone rich and famous who has no business being famous
I’m a licensed psychologist and I can tell you that Jordan’s daughter looks like she’s 9 years old when her father is speaking…it’s heartbreaking.
What are you talking about?
We view people through a glass darkly based on our own biases and experiences, granted, but she's always struck me as someone who has been socialized to use even her own loved ones as ladders to further her own success, and who will devour Daddy's corpse without much sentimentality for the nutrients when the time comes, like an anaconda with perfectly-groomed eyebrows.
@@dinosaysrawr wow!! Yes, perhaps.
@@havefunbesafe , I imagine she loves and idolizes him in her way, but I personally can't imagine an adult child who had genuine empathy, concern, and love for their parent enabling them the way she has, unless she's *truly* as deluded as he is. As it stands, she really does come across to me as using him to launch her own brand.
@@dinosaysrawr Oh, so a woman as maneater. I've never heard that before. Watch out boy, she'll eat you up! And does she have RBF? What's next? Black widow, bombshell, ball and chain..?
What do we meeeeean by the word “Jordan”? What do we meeeeean by the word “Peterson”? And how can we somehow tie Raskolnikov into this? *starts crying
That's funny.
I'm quite pro-free speech. But if you use your credentials to legitimize utter bullshit in your own field of study which harms people that is malpractice and your credentials should be taken away.
I used to be woot woot free speech but these right wingers stirring up such a moral panic against LGBTQ and BLM groups the last few years has me convinced that the government has a duty to protect vulnerable groups from hate mobs and lone wolf extremist attacks. It’s not hard to see the internet haters are directing the crazies to lash out.. how many shootings end with the FBI combing through their search history to find Shapiro, Tim pool, Matt Walsh, Libs of Tic Toc before we see what is right in front of our faces.. it’s exactly what isis was doing with terrorism.. hate preaching needs to be stopped. They are directing the attacks pretty much.
These people's claims are idealogical insanity, they are taking everything out of context just like the college of psychologists
@@Jack-hv3uj thank you, for once, someone with actual common sense and critical thinking. Carl Jung once said "thinking is hard, so most people judge" and when you look at it nowadays most of these podcasts aint about critical thinking, they just about perpetuating judgement in the form of "reacting to so and so's online breakdown"
What kind of things has JP said that is utter bullshit? What has he said that is complete bs because the stuff I’ve heard him say so far has been pretty much true.
@yakobelt Seriously? He lies about government legislation and has transitioned to running a cult.
Sweet clown suit, though.
With that ridiculous suit, Jordan's transformation into a 1960s Batman villain is complete.
No, Red Skull is a Captain America villain, not a Batman villain
It's a wonderful suit. Give it a rest.
It's a step up from dressing like a dick tracy villian like he used to.
Healthcare professionals have to practice according to a Code of Ethics. We all have them. If you don’t practice accordingly you can lose your license. He should just give up his license if he can’t act like a professional.
I just scanned his code of ethics. He went against a few requirements. The worst is slurring those physicians. That’s a no no. If they think a professional is doing anything unethical they can not broadcast it. They are allowed to talk with the other professional but they can’t broadcast it. And the way he treats others is definitely enough to get his license revoked.
I think the issue here is that his own profession is captured by 'trans' ideology. England, Sweden, and Finland have all done systematic reviews of the evidence and found no evidence for 'transitioning' minors and that the harm it has caused is not justifiable. And France, Norway, and Denmark are also putting the brakes on these medical interventions. The suicide rate is x19 higher post-transition and often occurs w/i 5-10 yrs after transition.
The 'trans' agenda is promoted primarily by wealthy, male, heterosexual cross-dresser sexual fetishists, autogynephiles/transvestic fetishists. (To follow the money see The 11th Hour Blog). Men who often have other paraphilias. These men invade women's single-sex spaces and supplant women's and LGB's sex-based rights--including women's sports. Most of these men are genitally-intact. And they promote mutilating 'transitioning' of minors that is not justified by the evidence. Many of these minors are just gay or lesbian who are 'sex lobotomized' by the 'gay conversion therapy' of 'transitioning.' 'Transgenderism' is misogynist and homophobic to its core.
It is a medical scandal that I hope results in more legislation banning it and lawsuits that will curtail it. See reduxxdotinfo and the IEA interview w/ Helen Joyce, author of 'Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality' to understand what 'trans' 'gender identity' is really about. See Women's Liberation Front and LGB Alliance, LGB United, Women's Declaration International USA. These are liberal orgs. that are women's rights advocate and for same-sex attracted men and women (LGB).
I’ve never seen someone wail and cry so much about what’s probably going to amount to sitting through PowerPoints for half an afternoon.
🤡🤡🤡
What's it like being an NPC?
As a “daft Canadian” I call him Kermit P. Benzodiazepine
I love to wear a jacket with my own signature on it.
Jordy Peterson has mastered the art of sensory assault.
Every professional is required to be "re-educated". It's called Continuing Professional Development. In fact Professional Ethics is a mandatory component of CPD.
Why is his daughter sexualizing herself on a podcast with her father by wearing makeup?
How does he figure that this board is OBLIGATED to certify him?
He doesn't have a legal right to certification.
Any American psych org will gladly license him. We believe in freedom and truth unlike the nazi fascists. At least the sane one here that aren't brainwashed by the alphabet cult.
@@BDub2024 Its not really intelligent discussion he engages in, it's overblown rhetoric that most of his followers accept.
@@BDub2024 I'm not Canadian, but my feeling is that pretty much nothing that he says is based in any fact or even honest reason.
The Canadian law that he complains "compels speech" just plain doesn't. To say so is like saying the 2d amendment to the US Constitution MANDATES that all Americans must have guns, it just doesn't say that.
Then he goes on to talk about how certain surgeons are "butchers" because they perform gender reassignment surgery, which would apply equally to any surgeon, especially those who perform any elective surgery whatsoever, cosmetic surgery, breast enhancement, anything really.
Former Trump spokesperson Kaley McEnany had an elective radical mastectomy because her mother had breast cancer and she tested positive for genetic markers.
Was her surgeon a "butcher" for "hacking off" (terminology Peterson has actually used in discussion) her healthy breasts?
What about the children? Children mostly can't get ANY surgery on their own, parental consent is mostly required, and that goes for gender reassignment surgery, which is so rarely performed on minors it's fair to say it isn't. So that's just a red herring.
But what about breast surgery on teenage girls?
That also requires consent, but usually it's a case of breast reduction where a girl's breasts come in uncomfortably large, or they have breast cancer, or they are getting enhancement, which Jordan doesn't complain about.
Bottom line: nobody is being "butchered", least of all kids, it just isn't happening.
This goes into politics where he excoriates anyone with ideas that don't fit a very narrow conservative orthodoxy, as crazed marxists and communists, which is plain ludicrous. Joe Biden is ideologically much closer to conservative than he is to socialist, and communism hasn't even entered the chat. But all that he talks about are evil leftists and cultural marxists, bogeymen he makes up clearly to suit an agenda.
So his penchant for hyperbolic rhetoric seems quite purposeful, more like he's trying to ACHIEVE something than simply express himself, and that's called "politics", not honest expression or debate.
So while I agree that intelligent discussion is critical, I disagree that Jordan participates in it. I would welcome him to participate in a genuine dialogue, but he seems to have abandoned that for a much more pragmatic path.
His preference toward extreme rhetorical exaggeration just makes him seem like an erratic madman.
That's what I think anyway.
@@itsROMPERS...well said. Thank you.
@@BDub2024 Surely you realize the flaw in your reasoning? Children need surgery the same as anyone else: to save their lives.
Kids need heart surgery, they need to have a burst appendix removed. But it's always sunny with parental consent or in lieu of that, court consent when the parent is not available or not capable.
Surgery on children is not happening outside these strictures
Society should surely protect the young and the weak, that's a given, and we do.
I don't see what the argument is here.
He literally dresses bipolar now..
JP is soooo close to getting it when he explains it. He factually lays it out that a professional organization has rules against what he does and then is confused by it. He has such a strong moral high ground on the wrong side of things.
My dude, just rescind your membership and grift in peace.
What rule did he break exactly?
@@The_Vitruvian I don't know the exact verbiage but, something in their ethics code about respectful language and unjust discrimination.
@@BeverlySummers10 . Exactly. You don't know the rule. And neither does Ontario College of Psychologists. Nor does Jordan. Only fascists dis-bar professionals for being "disrespectful" of politicians.
@@The_Vitruvian if it was just his comments about politicians, you would have a point and I’d be inclined to agree. However, in his case, it might be all the other, not politically centric, hateful crap he said that’s getting him into trouble.
@@The_VitruvianNot knowing the exact verbiage is not the same as not knowing the rule. They have a clear code of conduct
Christ; he’ a narcissist who is addicted to social media. They need to just take his license away; he’s going to play the victim anyway
Please have David back on more, he was great on the Majority Report.
I’d like to imagine he wore that actual suit to the professional hearing as well
And everyone laughed at him
I’m sure it helped his case.. proving his sanity 💯
@@dustinsindledecker154What's wrong with the suit? Do you not like it because of who's wearing it?
I wish that David would have pointed out the other glaring fact about how disingenuous Jordan is being. This is a provincial certification and the Ontario government is currently a right wing party. Blaming the federal government for this is obviously disingenuous and Jordan knows that. Nothing but grift.
Absolutely, he knows he's wrong but like a spoiled child cannot accept the reality of the situation. He has to make a choice, be a doctor or be a blowhard.
Is the College even a government entity? I'd be interested to know if professional licensing bodies are actually part of government. I know they are usually formed under a provincial act but are they actually part of government? Now I'm genuinely curious.
@@Happytravellerkimmydoes it need to be?
If Peterson signed to a code of ethics, then its similar with bringing any other profession into disrepute, from doctors, to engineering and football players.
@@heathwirt8919 That choice was made decades ago. Peterson has always been a FLAKE.
These people's claims are idealogical insanity, they are taking everything out of context just like the college of psychologists
Didn’t he call the doctors “butchers” ?
Yep. In regard to the surgeon who did Elliot Page's top surgery. Also describes that surgery as criminal. He's a deeply unserious person.
He also compared them to Mangela.
@@CosmicNihilMengele, yes. The Nazi monster.
When is Jordan Peterson finally going to explain why no Canadians have been arrested for misgendering people???
That was cool of Jordan to cosplay as the 6th Doctor from Doctor Who.... 🤣
Remember that part in 1984, where Winston got kicked out of the yact club because he wouldn't stop pooping his pants. This is just like that, it really makes you think.
Remember when in room 101 when they put the cage of trans affirming care in front of him until he became a they/them
@@GrimReader You and Imac are hilarious.
Thanks for having David on. It's nice to see my fellow Canadians who are not RW grifters.
Canadians unite, eh!
Canadian here, and I think David here is the closest thing to a left-wing reactionary new media has. He's audience captured much like Tim Pool and others, only from a deeply left-wing perspective.
Jordan Peterson rw?
right, that would be left wing loons. Forcing people to use specific speech is a violation of freedom of speech but Justine Trudeau doesn't care if her country is a totalitarian kingdom.
Yeah, he is just another lefty loony.
How is he an authority on masculinity and sit like he does?
Lol😂
He's made of felt, foam and stuffing. We can't expect much in terms of posture.
@@HarryDirtay You forgot: he's full of sh*t, too😉
Repressed homosexuality often manifests as imagined hyper masculinity.
He also cries...like a lot...and according to "Alpha Males", crying is a sign of a weak male. JBP basically cannot fit into the rigid standards he set for himself.
I have a friend that just entered his second year of college. And he had been to a JP lecture and had taken notes. That utterly terrified me that this lunatic is touring college campuses speaking to college students and spreading his brand if cancer for a profit.
@@adamp108I'd love to see those notes to see how incoherent, meandering psychobabble can be translated into somethig meaningful. In my ed. psychology 401 class,years ago, the easiest way to get an "A" was to go on a "retreat" and blow the prof or be a big suck-up if you were a guy - no lie.
How is JP a lunatic?! There are tens of millions of people who disagree with you are they 'lunatics' as well!? JP given MILLIONS of people a purpose in life and is in my opinion one of the greatest men of our generation, calling JP a lunatic is a spit in the face to the millions who love him.
As a Canadian, I can say for all of us that we are happy to take Jordan Peterson back to our land.
…our large, mostly unpopulated and entirely internet-free land. I’m certain that we can house him somewhere that would befit his unique perspective.
Saskatchewan?
I'm surprised he hasn't been taken to court for revealing the complainants personal information over twitter when he posted the notice the college of psychologists had sent him. He or someone on his staff had used the shape tool in acrobat to black out name, addresses, telephone numbers and emails but all you had to do was open the document in a pdf editor and delete the boxes to see the info.
Stupid comment. Did he reveal the info or did the idiot who decided to remove the redacted edits like you described reveal the info?
To my opinion it is not a problem that he developed this "tv personality". The problem is that he insists that it is legit psychology. In my opinion, he engages in mental pornography, so it should be mentioned at the beginning of each of his programs.
@@runnermcturtle5893 so you think that YOUR OPINION should be stated at the beginning of HIS talks? Make that make sense.
@@runnermcturtle5893 Mental pornography? I don't think anyone gets addicted or captivated by his lectures even though he says some good things here and there and may motivate some people. Bit of a weird comparison lol
@anacc3257 you're either one of his sycophants attempting to cover for him or have yet to meet one.
16:33 I’ve been thinking this every time she's onscreen, but the way you can see his daughter's soul just leave her body and almost hear her inner monologue of “I wonder when he'll finally run out of gas” will never stop being funny to me. Like you know that woman has sat through thousands of these rants at the family dinner table.
Don't blame her for trying to kill him tbh
Her crazy Dad and his insane rants are her meal ticket. Without him, she'd probably become an Only girl.
Didn't she call him on twitter though? That tells us that she's at least incredibly annoyed with all the nastiness that he's spewing all the time.
Peterson stuck in his own hero journey at the 'Goddess' phase, trapped by motherly support of wife and daughter, Anima issues in obsession with female body dysphoria.
Carl Jung would have a field day.
He strikes me as the type who sits silently at family meals, inviting his family, to do all the talking, thereby allowing him to sit in silence judgment.
As a psychologist, he must know that overcoming the biological will to live, letting go of one's multiple attachments to life as well as to loved one's, is no painless, easy or simple task and that it would take a whole lot of mental courage and guts (not to mention, a whole lot of unresolvable subjective angst and suffering or a complete loss of hope) to even begin to overcome those factors and consider a self-exit, even if one were faced with an incurable terminal illness. How can he not know this as a psychologist, let alone ask someone to just "go do it" when any DIY option is far from easy or simple?
No one should be asking anyone to go _-I-L-L themselves. Period. Especially not a psychologist.
The reason programs like MAID are there, is to provide people with the right to choose a voluntary, painless, guaranteed, peaceful and compassionate exit from life, at a time of their choosing, where they can find closure with loved ones, say their goodbyes and so that they don't have to resort to ill-reasoned or gruesome and painful methods of self exiting. There is no peaceful DIY method available to most people on this planet and he ought to know this as a psychologist.
What if one of his patients was someone that was dealing with a terminal condition, terrible unresolvable suffering, nearing end of life and was asking for the means to a peaceful exit? Would he ask them to go just go _I-L-L themselves!? What kind of psychologist doesn't understand the actual logistics of a DIY exit? He really should NOT be asking ANYONE to "just go _I-L-L themselves"! and definitely not in a kermit-like voice.
Your argument is ridiculous. Everything you say about suicide is correct and tragic. He was pointing out the hypocrisy of the person's comment about population, which is the hypocrisy outlined by the [working class] philosopher Professor Scruton about privileged left wing people: everyone must not live/spend their money BUT NOT ME. That is what Peterson was pointing out. He was not encouraging that person to top themselves, so your argument is disingenuous.
@@sarahdlp524 No actually it is not. Certain ideologically, religiously or politically motivated people (not all, but some) seem to say this very thing, as if it’s some sort of a “rebuttal” to the topics that they are ideologically opposed to. It seems like they say this sort of thing during arguments about climate change, population (I guess… as you pointed out), or on topics like MAID, etc., etc. Maybe it’s a knee jerk reaction to positions they don’t agree with on an ideological basis, but as a psychologist, he ought to know better than to say it in the first place to anyone at all, regardless of their political orientation, their beliefs, etc. Really no one should be saying this to anyone else for any reason at all. Period. I mean, he’s a clinical psychologist! I don’t hate him (or anyone for that matter), I just disagree with him. Just because I disagree with someone, doesn’t mean that I must hate them.
The fact is that there are many ways to point out to someone that they are being hypocritical on any topic WITHOUT resorting to telling them that they could or should just go commit su-i___ as an ideologically motivated rebuttal. Given the very fact that actually doing so, in practical terms, is neither easy nor painless at all. It’s a callous thing for a psychologist to be saying. That’s the point. There is no painless, guaranteed, peaceful off-switch. He ought to know that as a psychologist, but he tends to say it nevertheless, as a so-called “rebuttal”. This is a common ideologically motivated retort by some, but should not be used as a retort at all. That’s the point. I hope that makes more sense.
Look, I have empathy and love for him as a person, despite disagreeing with him on many topics, knowing that he has been through a lot of suffering in his life, like any other person on this planet. But I don’t think anyone should use this as some kind of a “rebuttal” or comeback.
No one that wishes to live, should be asked to “go _ILL themselves. It should not be said as a rebuttal and not even as a joke. That’s the point. He’s a clinical psychologist!
I love Emma’s Jordan impression so much. It always makes me cackle
Came here to say the same thing. You beat me to it!
The suit signals, he has he completely accepted his clown status?
He needs a pair of those whacky old school rental bowling shoes to go with that jacket
For sure! Bowling or Clown shoes are a must with this get-up!
Emma's Jordan Peterson is pretty good.
Everything about Emma is pretty and good 😂
That suit should be enough to disbar him.
He may not need the licence but he sure needs the attention.
They could’ve banned him for that jacket alone.
Exactly! They weren’t restricting his right to express political opinions, they were saying his tweets were unprofessional and degrading. There’s a huge difference.
David looks like a human/normal Ron Desantis
For me it was the trucker strike that did it. Anyone who comes out against labor - for me - is significantly disassociated from reality. He is an academic - and everything revolves around "HIS" superior intellect.
Which trucker strike?
When was this?
@@hhiippiittyy There was a national trucking strike in Canada this year.
@@pjamesbda
Damn. I am outta' the loop. Ty.
pseudo-academic
So wait, you support Peterson then? He supported the strike, and the Canada government went evil authoritarian police state on them.
I know this is messed up as a leftist... but I didnt' even recognize Jordan Petersons daughter, she's had so much work done
I won't claim to have a good idea of what she used to look like, but will offer that I didn't recognize her until someone mentioned who Peterson was talking to.
She seems so unhappy
@@dustinsindledecker154 well she did struggle with depression and other issues and her father and her used it as a means for television spotlight.
Her face looks stiff and painful from all the botox. Well shes a rude person anyway now her face matches the inside. And the Michael Jackson nose = uncanny valley vibes
Nice to see David on the show.
Again he AGREED to this contract. They are not foisting anything upon him. He knows this stuff and he's taking advantage of the public's ignorance.
I think the Rational National is assigning too kuch intelligence to JP. Yes, this is a transparent grift, but Peterson is also a deeply unwell man and always has been even before the medically-induced coma. Dude is genuinely insane, but also a grifter.
He's insane, I honestly don't know how expect to not get in shit and post misinformation as a PSYCHOLOGIST. Like wtf does he think that they were gonna do. It's dangerous especially as someone with a psychology title.
What's your diagnosis? Insane is more legal defense term, than a precision clinical diagnosis.
@taiji1478 Dude the guy posts constant misinformation does it even matter what diagnosis it is at this point.
@@legendzero9000 curiosity for posterity's sake. You're all watching the cult of personality. He got respect. He got a following. He got a whole lot of money. It changed him.
It's not the job of a psychologist to give their political opinions or prescriptions.
Up yours woke moralist
What about:
Medical Doctors,
Dentists,
Pharmacists,
Optometrists,
Veterinarians,
Chiropractors,
Naturopathic Doctors,
Psychologists,
Social Workers,
Registered Nurses,
Nurse Practitioners,
Licensed Practical Nurses,
Midwives,
Medical Laboratory Technologists,
Radiological Technologists,
Physiotherapists,
Occupational Therapists,
Speech-Language Pathologists,
Dietitians,
Audiologists,
Psychometrists,
Medical Radiation Technologists,
Respiratory Therapists,
Paramedics,
Professional Engineers,
Architects,
Lawyers,
Paralegals,
Teachers,
Early Childhood Educators,
Financial Advisors/Planners,
Real Estate Agents,
Funeral Directors/Embalmers.
Well, whose job is it to voice political opinions other than press spokespersons? Does everyone else have no right to participate in open discourse?
He walked away from his practice and hopped onto the right wing gravy train many years ago. He only uses the title to add some intellectual veneer to his reactionary bigotry.
@@steven5054 What exactly are you driving at? Is your entire basis for this stance simply your disagreement? Reflect on the fact that this situation could impact you or someone you align with, potentially silencing discussions on societal matters. Keep in mind that he frequently echoes the majority's viewpoints. Stripping a professional's license carries immense weight, regardless of patient interaction. It's meant to remain apolitical, yet the court's disposition appears to contradict that principle. It’s mind bugling and will cause a chilling effect
As another Canadian I have always found Peterson pompous, arrogant and in love with the sound of his own voice and the belief in the superiority of his intellect, and like many professions there are rules you need to follow if you want speak in a capacity that doesn't follow the rules that everyone must adhere to if you want to remain a professional who belongs to it, at least he didn't start to cry even though he does a lot of whining
Love seeing David on here. great synergy!
It's prick in Canada
Remember when his daughter was partying with Andrew Tate in Romania during COVID lockdown? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
Dressing like he's enacting an evil plan......."I have you now Batman! myaa. You'll never escape...........THE CONTRARIAN!"
For the last time, Red Skull is a Captain America villain, not a Batman villain
"It appears that you're right, Dr Peterson. Despite your paranoid delusions you haven't broken the law."
"No, I'm right here! Oppress me, Bat Daddy!"
'THE CUNTRARIAN'
This is a glimpse into his daughters life growing up...just sitting there being berated, having to nod along silently on her own show.
can you tell me the definition of female
@@buddyguy4723predictable as ever
@@Hazel-rf4es thanks for volunteering a no. good job
@@buddyguy4723what's the definition of a man ? I mean that's a whishy washy question that's dressed up to look like a gotcha question. It means different things to different people. I know women with out a uterus doesn't mean they arnt women . Just a thinly valed attempt to cover their hate grift .
@@buddyguy4723if you have to come on RUclips to try and find out what a female is, you must really be stupid.
Buy a dictionary Bub!!!
Trans "affirmative" care deserves to be questioned tbh, I don't think that's a controversial view.
You should actually understand something before questioning it, it's controversial to have an opinion based on utter ignorance.
Educate yourself.
@@itcouldbelupus2842 How does your response do the work of convincing me to shift my view? I have educated myself on this issue, it's precisely BECAUSE I have educated myself on this issue that I have the view that I do. Condescending to people doesn't actually persuade them of anything. Moreover, the view that "you can't question X if you don't know anything about X...", questioning can be and often is the first step to understanding. What a silly comment you've made.
@@cleomenes01 You don't want to be convinced and I'm not trying to convince you, I already know for a fact that you gave not educated yourself on this topic, you've obviously learned everything you know about the subject from dishonest conservative political pundits.
Which means you're either very gullible, willfully ignorant or dishonest yourself.
Doesn't matter how eloquent I am, nothing I say will change your mind, no amount of facts will change your mind.
Conservatives only change their mind when they have enough personal experiences that force them to face their cognitive dissonance and consider rethinking Their original positions.
Conservative only care about their feelings, not facts.
@@cleomenes01 Where have you found your information? WPATH. This is a standard of care in western countries.
Why does he even care? He’s rich and just tweets and makes RUclips videos all day. (He doesn’t care. He just wants to be victimized.)
As it is, no one takes him seriously or should, but that suit...smh. Auditioning to be a villian in the next DC universe film?
I hope his daughter breaks away from her insane dad & makes a better life for herself. Run now!
She milks her daddy for clicks
She is an adult now, if she hasn't run from him, she's won't. Unfortunately, most of the damage to her has already been done while growing up. She herself has mental health issues and is promoting pseudo-science. She put JBP on an all-meat diet, which I'd argue really harmed him. When you spend so much time with toxic people, you don't see the toxicity inherent in their environment.
Canada does not have freedom of speech, we have freedom of expression. A Canadian would know that. But he's so Ameribrained.
what's the difference?
(not snark, I really don't know)
Also we do not have a constitution we have a charter. It is different because it is a different country. If you are going to talk about a different country the basic is to look at the rules of that country.
Yeah, what a fool for thinking he has the right to free speech, and for making an attempt to fight for that right on behalf of all Canadians. He's just not as smart as you, I guess.
Aren’t speech and expression two words that mean the same thing?
Don't force him on us. 😁
his little moment of clarity before doubling down literally doing the "no, its the kids who are wrong" meme but about the law and a judge is sending me
Imagine having Jordan Peterson for your therapist :O
he uses the Berating Technique with some Belittling school.
. . . or your prof. Good gawd, I'd be going to the Dean or at least the section prof. The guy is an abomination.
nightmare on kermit street
This is a flippant comment, I know, but wherever Mikhaila got her Russian Lip Flip procedure done...they did a really good job.
That suit is ridiculous. JP has become a villain lol
Why is he dressed like a face card?
He’s a 3 dressed up as a 9
@@terrymckenzie8786 A 2 dressed up as a joker.
I just thought he became the new Ronald McDonald for canada.
Are we not going to talk about the strange suit he’s wearing?! 😂 btw, I’m a LCSW/therapist. When we acquire our licensure, we are bound by the ethics board that we acquired said licensure from. When he decided to go against that code of ethics, he also decided to give up his licensure, and if something were taught about an undergraduate, graduate school and PhD programs all over not just the United States but the world.
There is _no way_ he got to where he is without knowing the ethical requirements of his profession or its governing body. He's loving this martyrdom bullshit and taking advantage of his followers' ignorance.
I think it's supposed to be from the cover of his Maps of Meaning book
Ethics to not have freedom of speech?
No thanks!
Which specific ethical requirements did he violate in his conduct? And also, do these specific ethical requirements extend beyond his practice as a clinical psychologist into his personal life and opinions?
As a Canadian, I can say that I don't agree with all of Peterson's views and current platform on Ben Shapiro's network. I don't agree with him platforming Netanyahu and other US conservatives. However, I do like Peterson's position on Canada's PM Justin Trudeau and a lot of what he wrote in his Rules of Life book. Some useful things in there. He offers a unique perspective on the cult of wokeness. I think what Ema and other libs try to do is basically say EVERYTHING he says is wrong.
If by unique, you mean out of touch, uninspired, and not based in any reality, then sure.
@@soulknife20 "Unique" in that its from a psychological point of view. Most won't comment or voice their opinion on it because of the repercussions. But having multiple genders and forcing people to use pronouns is a cult.
@@23ofSeptember
Give an example of 1 person who's been forced to use pronouns they don't agree with.
@@23ofSeptember Did you ever bother reading Bill C-16?
I love how all the freaks come out of the woodwork when someone agrees with Peterson on something. Libs and wokesters are desperate to shut down any criticism on pronouns. @@kevinskiles2033