Critique of Pure Reason | Immanuel Kant

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 3 июл 2024
  • let's talk about the groundbreaking world of Immanuel Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason," a cornerstone of modern philosophy. published in 1781, this monumental work dives into the complexities of human cognition and the nature of reality. discover Kant's revolutionary ideas on the boundaries of human knowledge, the role of the mind in shaping our experiences.
    Resource and further reading: amzn.to/3xKwtUZ
    Watch all my chaotic media edits with concise analyses: • MORPH ANGELS | 1ST WAVE
    🔍 Topics Covered:
    The Limits of Human Knowledge
    Phenomena vs. Noumena
    The Role of Cognitive Categories
    Synthetic A Priori Knowledge
    Kant's Copernican Revolution in Philosophy
    The Dialectic of Reason
    Aesthetic Dimensions in Knowledge
    📚 Why Watch?
    Explore how Kant's insights challenge empiricism and rationalism, proposing a unique perspective on how we perceive and understand the world. Reflect on the implications of Kant's ideas in today's information-rich society and their relevance to ongoing debates in philosophy, science, and beyond.
    #ImmanuelKant #CritiqueOfPureReason #Philosophy #HumanCognition #Metaphysics #Epistemology #PhilosophicalInquiry #TranscendentalLogic #PhilosophyExplained

Комментарии • 26

  • @StudiousBizyMike
    @StudiousBizyMike 14 дней назад +12

    I saw something on wikipedia (epistemology):
    A man sees smoke on the horizon and reasons that there is a fire. The smoke was actually a swarm of flying [animal], but there really was a fire there as well. The question is: did the man know there was a fire?
    This critique on pure reason is an excellent primer for many kinds of thought. That's why I like this video. It brings to light amazing ideas.

    • @dethkon
      @dethkon 3 дня назад

      I say that he knew there was a fire, only because you told us that “there is a fire” and that “he reasoned that there is a fire.” And so, the answer is inherent in the question (or rather, the setup for the question).
      I know what you meant though, sorry for cheating! 😈

    • @StudiousBizyMike
      @StudiousBizyMike 3 дня назад +1

      @@dethkon That's exactly what I thought as well. He did TJB there was a fire, but he didn't know there was a fire.

  • @HimanshuSharma-oy9ss
    @HimanshuSharma-oy9ss 20 часов назад

    Your understanding and articulation of Kant's book is praise worthy. It's precise.

  • @MorphAngelsYT
    @MorphAngelsYT  23 дня назад +24

    I had to re-upload this video because I received a copyright strike on the music I used, despite having the proper license. I apologize for any comments that were deleted along with the original video.

    • @user-wk3kg6bi2g
      @user-wk3kg6bi2g 23 дня назад +4

      ah the enemy of all creators “copyright strike”

    • @dethkon
      @dethkon 3 дня назад

      Haha owned

  • @PetiteDimanche
    @PetiteDimanche 7 дней назад +2

    Dude I saw the thumbnail and clicked immediately. Very eye-catching.
    I knew it would be good❤❤❤

  • @damin1916
    @damin1916 16 дней назад +1

    One of the most mind blowing works of philosophy ever created, great video!

  • @jameslabs1
    @jameslabs1 20 дней назад +6

    Wonderful. Thanks

  • @alexandrianautocruiser8024
    @alexandrianautocruiser8024 11 дней назад +1

    Amazing introduction, thank you.

  • @SyrianBugBro
    @SyrianBugBro 20 дней назад +3

    Wow....this is so well done and thought out.
    Keep up the good work.

  • @HimanshuSharma-oy9ss
    @HimanshuSharma-oy9ss 20 часов назад

    Some unexplained phenomena summon reason, which exposes the noumena of that occurence (the phenomenon at consideration).
    Eg. We can't see sub atomic particles or xrays but our reason and experimental enquiry revealed the existence of a host of such sub atomic particles and EM radiation.
    It's interesting how matter (senses) can not itself perceive 'the manifestations of other material things' (i.e phenomena) , but at the same time it can give rise to an abstract entity (consciousness, reason, thinking, etc.) which can grasp the scientific underpinnings of these manifestations.
    It sort of demands the presence of either a dualistic nature of matter, or presence of matter + something abstract that complements matter (soul or consciousness).

  • @dylankren8046
    @dylankren8046 9 дней назад +1

    Great video. I don’t know about the assertion that the a priori conditions of experience are fairly described as revolutionary. Maybe they had been forgotten. But let’s not confuse their remembrance with some new theory.

  • @nev-bq8fh
    @nev-bq8fh 21 день назад +4

    Awesome vid !

  • @eyesontheinside5776
    @eyesontheinside5776 20 дней назад +2

    thank you so much

  • @StudiousBizyMike
    @StudiousBizyMike 14 дней назад +1

    Brilliant video!

  • @Ibnsina4425
    @Ibnsina4425 6 дней назад

    Good video...knowledgeable... Simple explantion.. Keep it bro

  • @HowardGeoff
    @HowardGeoff 9 дней назад

    This was a wonderfully put together video, keep it up!

  • @VantasChannel
    @VantasChannel 16 дней назад +1

    Beautiful editing

  • @RTMaalGurJaR
    @RTMaalGurJaR 18 дней назад +3

  • @NDAsDontCoverIllegalActs
    @NDAsDontCoverIllegalActs 6 дней назад

    By design it seems

  • @Rachel-vx8se
    @Rachel-vx8se 3 дня назад

    If reality is formed by our mind why are there things we can’t change no matter how hard we try?

    • @MorphAngelsYT
      @MorphAngelsYT  2 дня назад +1

      based on this video according to kant on crituque of pure reason, our mind shapes how we perceive reality (phenomena), but it doesn't mean we can change reality itself. the mind organizes our experiences into understandable patterns, but it can't alter the underlying "things-in-themselves" (noumena) that exist independently of our perception. so even though our perception of the world is influenced by our mental structures, the actual things we encounter remain unchanged by our wishes or efforts. actually, you can understand the whole video just by reading the thumbnail.
      "You don't see things as they are, you see things as you are."

  • @michaelvandenheuvel317
    @michaelvandenheuvel317 День назад

    So you can get away with it.

  • @markmulligan571
    @markmulligan571 14 дней назад +1

    The conscience of good and evil, shared by 95% of humanity, is the Kantian categorical imperative. It is also the Christian Holy Ghost, left to us by Christ as a Comforter pending His Return to bring us back to Paradise. It is discriminating and self-actualizing; we don't need to figure out its justification or mechanics; merely obey it. To assist us in this task, we have the universal prayer Our Father, that Christ taught us. Assuming obedience to these simple and categorical imperatives, neither we as individuals nor our governments need do anything else, study anything else, obey anything else.