@@rattusgrenadus8291 bro did you not read what he said? The tension was palpable. Did you not palpabate??? Did you even watch Dune 2 if you didn’t palpabate? I palpabated twice.
@@rattusgrenadus8291 but you replied. You must care to some extent. I feel like there’s tension between us now. It’s very palpable. Let’s just palpabate and be friends
The new Feyd is a lot like the side villains you see in Chinese action movies. He’s the villain that is honorable and badass and doesn’t really go along fully with the main bad guys plans and is doing his own thing but still does evil shit
What I like about Feyd as a character was that he had a spoiled upbringing, where his success was given to him, like how his opponents in the ring were wounded. Yet he respectfully removes his armor to fight his final opponent on equal terms. And then respectfully returns Paul’s comment before battle. He definitely is a psychopath but he tries to be honorable in moments where it matters. Even if it’s all an act. At the same time, he doesn’t hesitate killing people he believes are beneath him. Reminds me a little bit of the concentration camp guard from Schindler’s list. When he started “sparing” people because for a moment it was an illusion of grandeur he put upon himself. But all he was doing was essentially placing a thin leash on himself that he could chew off at any moment and revert back to the animal he is.
Good analysis, more or less. His returning the salute was based on arrogance, but his saying "You fought well Atreidis" as he gasped his last was honor and pride. He truly was a worhty villian.
The duel in new Dune feels like a gladiator fight between two of the best in the imperium. The one in Lynch's version feels like two kids fighting in the backyard😂
If we're being honest the Lynch version is book accurate, but it's definitely less cinematic, I've read the books and I personally enjoy the fight from doing part 2 more because feyd still wouldn't have been able to kill Paul, for something like that to work Paul would have to choose to let his own heart stop, if he's not going to choose to die you kind of have to cut his head off, I don't think even Feyd rautha would have done that to an honorable opponent, so in the end you still get the feeling that Feyd didn't stand a chance because Paul wasn't trying, but it also still gives you a narratively satisfying fight, so denise velneiuve did something with dune I didn't think anyone could ever do, he kept the original intent of the duel, while also making it more satisfying to watch for a viewing audience, this is one of the few places where I feel like the movie was actually better than the book, sure they did kind of change the nature of Paul's threat against the spice fields, but overall this film had more of a satisfying climax than the book did
@@franminanicollier9431 the costumes are excellent in Lynch's version, without a doubt. Feyd's speedo, on the other hand...I like to think Sting just showed up on set in it and refused to wear anything else for that scene. Lol
Both have their charms. I love how over the top Sting played Feyd, he was clearly having the time of his life, and I also love a good 80s camp. But there is no denying for a serious climactic duel the new Dune 2 is masterful.
Just watched Part one and noticed that Paul uses the phrase "May thy Knife splint and shatter" which he got from Jamis the Fremen he killed in the end of Part 1
just watched it last night. can you explain why he said "talk to me jamis". is it like a friend who he can talk to when he needs advice through visions?
Paul saw a future where Jamis became a beloved friend, and mentor among the Fremen. That's why he cried when he had to kill him, and called out for his advice. @ENRU08
Choreography was better in the new one, but the old one looked more like a real fight and it had a conclusive ending. I still don't know how the fight ended in the new one, it seemed like Paul handed Feyd a knife, and Feyd grabbed it with his stomach. 🤷
It's strange because I was not worried for Paul in the book. The novel propelled Paul a little too high for him to realistically lose. By actually having him take damage and struggle, I was on the edge of my seat during the movie. It wasn't as clever as Feyd inadvertently trapping himself with his own hidden blade, but I still really like it.
@@alexvarnado530 Yeah it was a dumb comment, mine. It's just, I ever wondered, being a non-native english speaker, if people irl really talked like in succession or just people in the higher classes, or just people in the series, the dialogue just seemed odd
@@soyitiel no it wasn't a dumb comment at all. I'm an English speaker and that's why I was asking.. 1984 Feyd sounded so stupid. But Succession.. no. That's Hollywood. I'm also not a Billionaire so I could be wrong 🤣
Dune 1984: S.F.G Army moves + Krav Maga knife defenses. Dune 2024: More agility (Close to Capoeira or Brazilian Jiu Jitsu) + Faster attacks and defenses + Multiple different knife moves taken from martial arts
The classic duel was not as refined as the recent dune fight...but the ending was more fitting to show power and dominance. The reaction of the actors when Paul burst open Fay's chest.....pure poetry!
Patrick Stewart should have been cast as the emperor in Dune Part 2. Walker didn't have much to do, and didn't add anything unique, so it would have been a cool nod to this film.
Sting' s interpretation of Feyd is much more interesting to watch: he is alive, fun-loving and emotional, not robotic doll-like monster, with fiery colored shock of hair. He definitely attracted attention.
Denis Villeneuve's version is awesome and it doesn't even need Hans Zimmer's soundtrack for it! Too bad the old version is so incredibly cheesy. Edit: Mixed them up of course, fixed now...
@@richardshiflett5181 Big mistake, cause yes, the production for TV was cheap, and the costumes were horrendously flamboyant, but it brought the story closer to the book than even the recent films. If these recent movies would had mixed some of the good things the TV mini series had done, it would had been so much better.
@@jeanvaljean6433 Because it is. The issue is that many people's adaptations fare differently hitting on the message, but ultimately they all fail. You can even see how George Lucas did when he "Borrowed" from DUNE to MAKE Star Wars. Perhaps if you actually read DUNE you would understand why the source material IS indeed superior. Villenueve clearly skimmed the books and just did his interpretation, cause his films as good as they look are still as dumb as the past adaptations.
Dune 2 was more influenced by old school Hong Kong action movies, fast and brutal. While the Dune 1984 version was more influenced by Akira Kurosawa styles, slow and methodical.
I prefer the new one, it's more quiet and more personal. It lets the context be the exposition especially without music. The old one is too noisy, and then Feyd jumps around like a babboon announcing that he'll kill Paul, instead of you know, doing it?
The fight choreography in Lynch's version is a joke. Before anyone comments, though, I'm not telling you what you should or shouldn't like. I'm saying that I find whatever that was quite amusing. Feel free to disagree
Paul and Feyd fighting in the 1984 version totally reminds me of fighting with my older brother 💀 “I will kill you!” - Cringely bites my opponent’s fingers like a Fuckn maniac 😂
My thought is you weren’t alive in 84 to see this film back then. It was pretty good for 40 years ago and Lynch in my opinion had a better atmosphere and better characters. There is nothing intimidating in my opinion of the Barron in the new dune film. Lynch’s Barron for instance was so much better. As much as I like skarsgard in his other roles he is just playing Brando here from Apocalypse Now. I do like some of the new ideas in this film but the first half of the film is just a slowed up version of the 84 dune. And that’s fine but it’s not fair to rip the movie. Try making a model of a sandworm 40 years ago without the technology you have today. Lets see how you do.
@@DailyShit. my thoughts on the original movie. You have yours I have mine. Looks like for different reasons. A lot of people like the older version. It was pretty cool to see this 40 years ago. And lynch is brilliant whatever he does. Was it perfect. No. But at the time it was pretty cool.
Some B.S. Lynch thought of...the Voice doesn't really split floors...nor does it work through 'weirding modules', which was the real treason of the 1984 film
@@abhishekghosh2686There's more to a movie than production value. This fight is nicely paced, the costumes look fantastic, the acting is generally good. There are even a few clever moments in the choreography.
@@PeacePetal "This fight is nicely paced, the costumes look fantastic, the acting is generally good. There are even a few clever moments in the choreography." ....Every single sentence you just said, the exact opposite is true...at least on planet Earth
The Lynch version is so camp and over the top, it has it's place but to pretend the it's in the same league as Villeneuve's Dune as a piece of cinema is crazy. Sting was abysmal 😂
The new film is better in almost everything except this duel, Paul and Chani, i actually like more the old version of the duel because it looks more natural while the new one just looks like a cliche final fight between the hero and the evil boss. The old version's Paul suits more what would you expect to see in Lisan Al Gaib, the old Chani actually seems like a better depiction of Chani, honestly I disliked Zendaya as Chani.
I agree with your take on Chani, Zendaya is the worst part of the new movie. But Timothee is perfect as Paul, the old actor felt so stiff, I look at him and I don't see Paul, I just see a generic looking 80s teen heartthrob.
'aesthetic' is not the right word...you're one of those ppl who prefers kitsch camp and bad acting...it's okay, there's no accounting for taste, or lack of it.....and you're hardly the only one, it's for people like you why Hollywood cranks out such cheap crap on a regular basis...the problem is, they're ruining the cinematic experience for those who have an eye for quality
Chalamet just isn't a commanding presence on screen, and Butler was a poor stand-in for Sting. The brilliant, opulant art direction added immeasurably to the dramatic tension in 1984.
@@88fejiit’s inferior no offense it’s just seems too goofy and cheese y and over the top compared to Villanueves version. Btw this is coming from a guy who thinks Dune Part 2 is overrated.
@@88feji "I'm sure there are also many intelligent people who loves the 1984 version more"....I don't know how many tbh... More like people with no taste or discernment, who prefer cheap kitsch camp and bad acting...I'm sorry but that's the only logical conclusion for anybody who prefers this over Villeneuve's version...it's not even in the same league...even Lynch admitted this film was a disaster and disowned it
It was a different time, people had different tastes back then. I noticed that the 1984 dune holds the viewer's hand a lot. Lots of exposition and dialogue. The modern dune lets the viewer figure a lot of details out on their own
@@MultiAxianit’s a different time doesn’t really work when their are films from 1984 that have beautiful practical effects and acting and energetic fight scenes. Not to mention there’s films way older than the 80s that managed to do it too. A lot of this old action is closer to a stage play
@@T-h-a-t_G-u-y This was crap even for the time...trust me I saw it in the theatres, that was the general reaction back then...why do you think it bombed?....'Blade Runner' came out 2 years before this and had much better effects, better acting, better everything
@@solen5529 The acting in the first one is 100% better, the new acting is a bunch of feminine babies that act like they're in the bold and the beautiful, which is majority of actors these days, it sucks real acting with good emotion is never coming back.
Развлечения
The fight choreography for that fight in Dune 2 was perfection. The tension in the theater was palpable.
For sure. I palpabated the entire time.
fr i appreciated how it looked like every fight ever
@@rattusgrenadus8291 bro did you not read what he said? The tension was palpable. Did you not palpabate??? Did you even watch Dune 2 if you didn’t palpabate? I palpabated twice.
@@CoyotebullPup i feel like you're either on the spectrum or dont know what palpable means either way idc
@@rattusgrenadus8291 but you replied. You must care to some extent. I feel like there’s tension between us now. It’s very palpable. Let’s just palpabate and be friends
The new Feyd was more honorable and way more intimidating
Yeah Sting on the other hand went over the top, making it quite campy, even though I like campy stuff in movies
honorable no a cannable and crazy person it was the onley interesting part of the movie. tacky as hell most of the fights were too easy.
The new Feyd is a lot like the side villains you see in Chinese action movies. He’s the villain that is honorable and badass and doesn’t really go along fully with the main bad guys plans and is doing his own thing but still does evil shit
@@Nicholas_Chen_ That was the 1980s
He talked a lot less, and was more economical with his movements, both of which really added to his intimidation factor.
1:19 It’s the finger bite for me, and Paul’s hilarious grunt, and Sting’s evil laugh. So over the top, so camp, I love it 🤣
Dune 2 final fight was so good.
What I like about Feyd as a character was that he had a spoiled upbringing, where his success was given to him, like how his opponents in the ring were wounded. Yet he respectfully removes his armor to fight his final opponent on equal terms. And then respectfully returns Paul’s comment before battle.
He definitely is a psychopath but he tries to be honorable in moments where it matters. Even if it’s all an act. At the same time, he doesn’t hesitate killing people he believes are beneath him.
Reminds me a little bit of the concentration camp guard from Schindler’s list. When he started “sparing” people because for a moment it was an illusion of grandeur he put upon himself. But all he was doing was essentially placing a thin leash on himself that he could chew off at any moment and revert back to the animal he is.
I agree but have to note, I thought he was amused by Paul's comment and a bit mocking when he repeated it back to him.
@@Blashmack I was wondering that too. I’m 50/50 on whether or not he was mocking
Good analysis, more or less. His returning the salute was based on arrogance, but his saying "You fought well Atreidis" as he gasped his last was honor and pride. He truly was a worhty villian.
@@deejin25 I almost forgot about that. Good memory
The duel in new Dune feels like a gladiator fight between two of the best in the imperium. The one in Lynch's version feels like two kids fighting in the backyard😂
If we're being honest the Lynch version is book accurate, but it's definitely less cinematic, I've read the books and I personally enjoy the fight from doing part 2 more because feyd still wouldn't have been able to kill Paul, for something like that to work Paul would have to choose to let his own heart stop, if he's not going to choose to die you kind of have to cut his head off, I don't think even Feyd rautha would have done that to an honorable opponent, so in the end you still get the feeling that Feyd didn't stand a chance because Paul wasn't trying, but it also still gives you a narratively satisfying fight, so denise velneiuve did something with dune I didn't think anyone could ever do, he kept the original intent of the duel, while also making it more satisfying to watch for a viewing audience, this is one of the few places where I feel like the movie was actually better than the book, sure they did kind of change the nature of Paul's threat against the spice fields, but overall this film had more of a satisfying climax than the book did
Everyone praising the new version, but you know what the new one doesn't have? Michael Bolton on drums.
And the costumes. I think I prefer the costume designs of the older movie.
@@franminanicollier9431 the costumes are excellent in Lynch's version, without a doubt. Feyd's speedo, on the other hand...I like to think Sting just showed up on set in it and refused to wear anything else for that scene. Lol
@@falgalhutkinsmarzcal3962 I, too, will decide that is the canon reason lol
That was A Michael Bolton, not THE Michael Bolton.
and Captain Picard!
That had to STING.
I'll see myself out
Please do josh
Both have their charms. I love how over the top Sting played Feyd, he was clearly having the time of his life, and I also love a good 80s camp. But there is no denying for a serious climactic duel the new Dune 2 is masterful.
ok boomer
@@jorgeimancilla3170uncalled for
@@cykrya5156 OG Dune looks and feels like a bad parody 🤷🏻♂️
Just watched Part one and noticed that Paul uses the phrase "May thy Knife splint and shatter" which he got from Jamis the Fremen he killed in the end of Part 1
Chip* and shatter
He also beat his chest twice in the say way before attacking too.
just watched it last night. can you explain why he said "talk to me jamis". is it like a friend who he can talk to when he needs advice through visions?
u mean part one? I think that the visions he had where like different possible futures e.g. where he is friends with jamis and so one.@@ENRU08
Paul saw a future where Jamis became a beloved friend, and mentor among the Fremen. That's why he cried when he had to kill him, and called out for his advice. @ENRU08
Wait wait wait the old Paul holding the knife as if he's going to fight voldemort... What was he thinking😂
Choreography was better in the new one, but the old one looked more like a real fight and it had a conclusive ending. I still don't know how the fight ended in the new one, it seemed like Paul handed Feyd a knife, and Feyd grabbed it with his stomach. 🤷
I love both. I just wish it was a bit longer in the new one, the choreography was awesome. And Feyd is METAL as fuck 🤘🤘
it is actually much longer than shown here, the clip in the video is just a short section shown in the promos
Yeah make it longer and I would have had a heart attack in IMAX.
@@mollywoodshots6503 hell yeah 🤘
That one dude has got some pretty heavy duty eyebrows 😂😂
😅😅
That's Thufir Hawat. The mentat characters in Lynch's Dune had bushy hair and eyebrows, as well as the stained lips.
What I love about David lynches version are the bizarre changes that aren't even in the book lol
@@jeannebrady909the new dune really deleted this character entirely
Anthony Davis granpa
"I will bend like a reed in the wind" is the coolest line. Can't be topped.
Imagine no music and Feyd is yelling to a silent and calm room I WIELLL KELLL HEEMMMM
It's strange because I was not worried for Paul in the book. The novel propelled Paul a little too high for him to realistically lose. By actually having him take damage and struggle, I was on the edge of my seat during the movie. It wasn't as clever as Feyd inadvertently trapping himself with his own hidden blade, but I still really like it.
Why did they have to talk like that in the most weird times? Even in the 80s they had to have been like... what😂
You ever watched succession?
@@soyitiel just to clarify, I was just talking about the 80s version and the dumb shit Sting was saying as Feyd. But yes I have seen succession
@@alexvarnado530 Yeah it was a dumb comment, mine. It's just, I ever wondered, being a non-native english speaker, if people irl really talked like in succession or just people in the higher classes, or just people in the series, the dialogue just seemed odd
@@soyitiel no it wasn't a dumb comment at all. I'm an English speaker and that's why I was asking.. 1984 Feyd sounded so stupid.
But Succession.. no. That's Hollywood. I'm also not a Billionaire so I could be wrong 🤣
Because David Lynch is a wonderful insane man.
Somebody call The Police!
It always made me laugh the way Patrick Steward begged "Puh-leease!!!"
Harnokken ANIMAL!
The fate of the universe is decided by the outcome of this fight.
The first dune fight scene was about perfect control and adaptability
Shit movie
Everyone knows it, even the director lmao.
In his wildest dreams he could never top sting as feyd😂
Dune 1984: S.F.G Army moves + Krav Maga knife defenses.
Dune 2024: More agility (Close to Capoeira or Brazilian Jiu Jitsu) + Faster attacks and defenses + Multiple different knife moves taken from martial arts
Can't forget the cheesy chit-chat in the '84 version (why?!).
The classic duel was not as refined as the recent dune fight...but the ending was more fitting to show power and dominance. The reaction of the actors when Paul burst open Fay's chest.....pure poetry!
If ever there were a definition of eyebrows, that one guy was it
Patrick Stewart should have been cast as the emperor in Dune Part 2.
Walker didn't have much to do, and didn't add anything unique, so it would have been a cool nod to this film.
The old one feels like a comedy😂
It is. An unintentional comedy
It always cracked me up the Fremen brought drums with them in the 1984 movie.
Military and drums....no more odd than military with bagpipes.
Dune TV Series actually had the superior fight.
Sting' s interpretation of Feyd is much more interesting to watch: he is alive, fun-loving and emotional, not robotic doll-like monster, with fiery colored shock of hair. He definitely attracted attention.
I thought that I was going to get the whole 2024 fight for a second.
"compared" means that I can see the "Dune 2" part I imagine
The drum guys tho😂🤦♂️
In the new fight Paul takes more damage. For dramatic effect and so Paul can get closer for a kill.
Denis Villeneuve's version is awesome and it doesn't even need Hans Zimmer's soundtrack for it!
Too bad the old version is so incredibly cheesy.
Edit: Mixed them up of course, fixed now...
Now I know where Zod got the I Will Kill Him from
Still wish the version had Paul using the voice snd splitting Feyd s body like in the 1984 version with Sting.
Yeah i wanted paul to use the voice too hes supposed to be superhuman
Hell yea like not asking for too much but at least let him COOK.
The voice can't do that though. It was just something Lynch invented. The voice only works on people
DUNE : PART TWO WAS SO SO SO SO SO GOOD!
Why is it that these comparison videos decide to neglect the 2000 SyFy version?
We pretend it never happened
@@richardshiflett5181 Big mistake, cause yes, the production for TV was cheap, and the costumes were horrendously flamboyant, but it brought the story closer to the book than even the recent films. If these recent movies would had mixed some of the good things the TV mini series had done, it would had been so much better.
@@EternalRomanWhy do people pretend that the source material is always superior
@@jeanvaljean6433 Because it is. The issue is that many people's adaptations fare differently hitting on the message, but ultimately they all fail. You can even see how George Lucas did when he "Borrowed" from DUNE to MAKE Star Wars. Perhaps if you actually read DUNE you would understand why the source material IS indeed superior. Villenueve clearly skimmed the books and just did his interpretation, cause his films as good as they look are still as dumb as the past adaptations.
1:20 to bite a man’s fingers😂😂😂
Dune 2 was more influenced by old school Hong Kong action movies, fast and brutal.
While the Dune 1984 version was more influenced by Akira Kurosawa styles, slow and methodical.
1:18 I never understood why Paul pretty much just gave his fingers to Feyd for him to BITE!
Really liked the fight in Dune 2 but something about the original just does it for me.
i love both
I like 2024’s better imo
The Lynch film is bizarrely closer to the book despite its flaws.
l’ve seen both,the DV version is better overall but l like the end of 1984 w the Voice 😉
one of my favorite movies as a child is utter trash to me now.
what makes it so much worse xD
You grew up
You now have no imagination....sad
Mannnnn, I was expecting that force push sooooo bad in Dune 2. It never came 😢
He’s not Black Bolt
Dune 2 version is a better final fight
I prefer the new one, it's more quiet and more personal. It lets the context be the exposition especially without music. The old one is too noisy, and then Feyd jumps around like a babboon announcing that he'll kill Paul, instead of you know, doing it?
I would love to see Cap Pricard/Profes Xavier whup some 🫏
Usul no longer needs the weirding module.
The fight choreography in Lynch's version is a joke. Before anyone comments, though, I'm not telling you what you should or shouldn't like. I'm saying that I find whatever that was quite amusing. Feel free to disagree
This fight was the only mostly right thing they did
Paul and Feyd fighting in the 1984 version totally reminds me of fighting with my older brother 💀
“I will kill you!” - Cringely bites my opponent’s fingers like a Fuckn maniac 😂
Lynch forgot that Paul isn’t actually a god, he just pretends to be
the old one looks like they having a parade 😂😂😂😂😂
i prefer the new one
What I thought was missing from the new version, despite them showing the arena fight, was that Feyd cheats!
Oh no! Dune directed by David Lynch is a comic movie versus Dune directed by Villeneuve
Time and production differences. It is not Lynch's fault entirely
My thought is you weren’t alive in 84 to see this film back then. It was pretty good for 40 years ago and Lynch in my opinion had a better atmosphere and better characters. There is nothing intimidating in my opinion of the Barron in the new dune film. Lynch’s Barron for instance was so much better. As much as I like skarsgard in his other roles he is just playing Brando here from Apocalypse Now. I do like some of the new ideas in this film but the first half of the film is just a slowed up version of the 84 dune. And that’s fine but it’s not fair to rip the movie. Try making a model of a sandworm 40 years ago without the technology you have today. Lets see how you do.
they did not have the technology then
@@Harry-fe9ecwow. Just wow. This is crazy delusional
@@DailyShit. my thoughts on the original movie. You have yours I have mine. Looks like for different reasons. A lot of people like the older version. It was pretty cool to see this 40 years ago. And lynch is brilliant whatever he does. Was it perfect. No. But at the time it was pretty cool.
Was that Micheal Bolton on the Drums?
What was the haduken move Paul pulls at the end of the 1980s version? Splits the floor for good measure.
Some B.S. Lynch thought of...the Voice doesn't really split floors...nor does it work through 'weirding modules', which was the real treason of the 1984 film
Lynch being Lynch
Feyd did the original "Nah I will win"
Honestly they’re both good.
Nop
Hell no😂😂 old one is so cringe and Paul holding the knife as if he's about enchant a spell on voldemort 😂
@@abhishekghosh2686There's more to a movie than production value. This fight is nicely paced, the costumes look fantastic, the acting is generally good. There are even a few clever moments in the choreography.
@@PeacePetal "This fight is nicely paced, the costumes look fantastic, the acting is generally good. There are even a few clever moments in the choreography." ....Every single sentence you just said, the exact opposite is true...at least on planet Earth
The Lynch version is so camp and over the top, it has it's place but to pretend the it's in the same league as Villeneuve's Dune as a piece of cinema is crazy. Sting was abysmal 😂
My Sting's waifu is still perfect
bro i hate to say it but the old movie looks so goofy compared to the 2024 version. I cringe everytime i see a scene from the old one
The Cast, boiz and girls. Thats it! Newest DUNE didnt get closer, what a shame
The cast yeah, but the set design, costumes and fight scenes beats it all the way.
The fight of Dune II is better but a "real" fight is not a coreography.
what is it with the scream at the end? lmao
Jose Ferrer played the emperor much better than Christopher Walken.
'84 version is so bad
The new film is better in almost everything except this duel, Paul and Chani, i actually like more the old version of the duel because it looks more natural while the new one just looks like a cliche final fight between the hero and the evil boss. The old version's Paul suits more what would you expect to see in Lisan Al Gaib, the old Chani actually seems like a better depiction of Chani, honestly I disliked Zendaya as Chani.
I agree with your take on Chani, Zendaya is the worst part of the new movie.
But Timothee is perfect as Paul, the old actor felt so stiff, I look at him and I don't see Paul, I just see a generic looking 80s teen heartthrob.
@@jagd7102How is Zendaya’s Chani the worst part of the movie? She does an amazing job
Sean Young was the boring, NPC, white version of Chani
@koko40800 Chani shouldn't be black either. She should be Middle Eastern.
@@jagd7102 Agree, Golshifteh Farahani would actually fit well in Chani's role, although Farahani is 40 i think she looks young enough.
The shout was a bit unnecessary i feel
NO WAY. THAT SHOUT DEMONSTRATED HIS NEW POWER!
And then Feyd jumped around like a monkey.
Original
Hope that Sting dont watch the Villaneuve version, the old guy dont need to be reminded that he can't act .
será duelo a muerte con cuchillos? yo creo que van a pelear con cuchillos!
I love the little twink twirl Sting does at 1:50
Sting is so terrible in this. I feel embarrassed for him just watching it.
Old feyd looked cooler
I prefer the old one. I like realism and the new Dune can be a tad over-the-top at times
lol dude, and sting yelling i will kill him, and the random dudes happening to have drums when a knife fight starts are not over the top at all
Why is Feyd the only good Harknonnin soldier? All the other ones suck
2024: Master of gold.
1984: Master of shit.
I can't be the only one who prefers the aesthetic of the old film
'aesthetic' is not the right word...you're one of those ppl who prefers kitsch camp and bad acting...it's okay, there's no accounting for taste, or lack of it.....and you're hardly the only one, it's for people like you why Hollywood cranks out such cheap crap on a regular basis...the problem is, they're ruining the cinematic experience for those who have an eye for quality
@@koko40800 I meant the costume and set design. No need to be a cunt.
@@valance10 Not being a C, just pointing that the costume and set design were also cheap
Contrarian. The “aesthetic” was all goofy cheap looking costumes
@@nixphx And? It is reminiscent of the artwork for the OG books.
Chalamet just isn't a commanding presence on screen, and Butler was a poor stand-in for Sting. The brilliant, opulant art direction added immeasurably to the dramatic tension in 1984.
"opulant" ?
Love the 1984 version ... I'm really disgusted by most Villeneuve fans, most will resort to unintelligent personal insults ... sadly
I'm sure there are also many intelligent people who loves the 1984 version more, best to ignore little immature people who wants to say otherwise ....
@@88fejiit’s inferior no offense it’s just seems too goofy and cheese y and over the top compared to Villanueves version. Btw this is coming from a guy who thinks Dune Part 2 is overrated.
They probably insult you because you insult them before even interacting with them.
1984 version is also worse in every conceivable way.
@@88feji "I'm sure there are also many intelligent people who loves the 1984 version more"....I don't know how many tbh...
More like people with no taste or discernment, who prefer cheap kitsch camp and bad acting...I'm sorry but that's the only logical conclusion for anybody who prefers this over Villeneuve's version...it's not even in the same league...even Lynch admitted this film was a disaster and disowned it
@@88feji wtf kind of opinion is this??? You actually came all the way to type that, really? What a deluded little person you are
How awful the old movie was 😂
the scene fro m1984 looks so poorly executed. Practical effects and poor acting.
It’s 1984
It was a different time, people had different tastes back then. I noticed that the 1984 dune holds the viewer's hand a lot. Lots of exposition and dialogue. The modern dune lets the viewer figure a lot of details out on their own
@@MultiAxianit’s a different time doesn’t really work when their are films from 1984 that have beautiful practical effects and acting and energetic fight scenes. Not to mention there’s films way older than the 80s that managed to do it too. A lot of this old action is closer to a stage play
@@T-h-a-t_G-u-y This was crap even for the time...trust me I saw it in the theatres, that was the general reaction back then...why do you think it bombed?....'Blade Runner' came out 2 years before this and had much better effects, better acting, better everything
@@stevensilver2880 Blade Runner came out years before just as an example.
Dune reboot is ghey
Glad Sting stayed with singing ,he sucked as an actor 👎
Dune 2 fight scene was terrible... nothing like in the book... always recreating the wheel.. always terrible...
Cry harder book purist
The new one is so clean and boring.
😂😂😂😂
It seems that someone doesn’t have money to buy tickets
Are you trying to say the old one is better? there's always that one guy looking for a way to be different smh
@@solen5529 The acting in the first one is 100% better, the new acting is a bunch of feminine babies that act like they're in the bold and the beautiful, which is majority of actors these days, it sucks real acting with good emotion is never coming back.
Always that one Mf.