"I have a hard time calling this piece rock music." Well there it is, you have unlocked the rest of what you will hear from the Beatles. First they mastered rock & roll music. Then through their inventive music and creative lyrics they broadened the definition wider and wider. "I didn't know you could do that in a rock song." You couldn't - not until the Beatles knocked down the walls. The Queen songs you have come to love would not have happened if the Beatles hadn't joyfully broken the rules of what a pop song could be. Through their example, breaking the rules became one of the defining characteristics of the genre.
Exactly. I have watched many of Amý´s videos. She really knows her stuff and she provides lots of interesting insights. But very ofted she lacks historical perspective. You need to know what pop music was like and how it was produced when the Beatles started. You just cannot apply the same standards to an early Beatles song and to Queen songs written ten years later. Without the Beatles´ revolution that music may have never been written.
We've all heard the phrase: "The Rolling Stones are the greatest Rock-n-Roll band ever." And I agree. The Beatles transcend that. McCartney once called the Stones the greatest cover band in history. He said: "We always wanted to cast a wider net." Understatement.
@@odurandina I'm guessing it might be that content/copyright would take down any lengthy Beatles segment so they had to record this one this way. I agree with your sentiment but that's my theory.
I think using the chorus for the intro sets up the main theme of the song. Then, you get a specific example of that theme (Elenore Rigby herself) which can be fleshed out. Then the chorus can come back in to remind us of what the song is about.
In 1972 I was in the 8th grade - and my young English teacher was teaching us poetry - using Eleanor Rigby as an example. When she got to the part where Eleanor *_puts on a face that she keeps in a jar by the door_* - our teacher started crying - I mean really crying. The room was deathly silent as she composed herself - and as I sat there - Eleanor Rigby became one of the favorite songs of my life - because I got it - lyrics mean things.
Gawd...and while he stands unique in that era, he had a BUNCH of 23-year-olds in his 'industry' in those years. I hope we still have those. I always wondered how Paul wrote this song - I assume "on the piano" - but he had access to cellos and violins IF he wanted. And for more experienced fingers, he had George Martin who I credit with final orchestration.
When Paul started recording Sgt Pepper, the Beatles 8th album, he was still only 24 years old. He began recording Rubber Soul, Revolver and Sgt Pepper between the ages of 23 and 24. It's outrageous.
your innocent, heartfelt analysis is truly touching. you remind me of my sister. she was a principal cellist in several orchestras (until she passed away a year ago), and the strings used to make her cry because of the simple energy, beauty, and harmonics. i'm getting tears hearing you explicate those beautiful details in her absence. thank you Amy.
This song is great in every possible way. Here and gone in 2 minutes and a few seconds. Loved your reaction. The background info was excellent. This song is one of The Beatles' songs that got EVERYBODY'S respect from around the world of music.
I think Roger Waters would respect and admire not only this song, but also Amy's brilliant analysis of and commentary on it. This universal need for connection and belonging inspires so much of Roger's lyrical composition and, here, Paul's unique and multifaceted songwriting skills. Amy's masterful, deep dive into Elanor's (and Father Mac's) story interestingly links these two artists.
I was convinced I wouldn't listen to nearly an hour of review on a 3 min song. Yet I did listen to it all. Shows how little I knew ! Hello EVERYONE, with Amy's first listen We Are All Together.😊
OK, 8 minutes in and I have to interject something important concerning the quote from engineer Geoff Emerick. Emerick is mistaken here and contradicts every other authoritative first hand source when he describes George Martin suggesting strings and having to persuade a reluctant McCartney. *Emerick here conflates the story of Yesterday with the storty of Eleanor Rigby." That;'s exactly what happened with Yesterday in 1965, right down to the detail of Paul fearing it could be "too lush, too Mancini [sic. Mantovani]". The story with Eleanor Rigby as told by John Lennon, by George Martin, and by Paul himelf, is quite different: According to John Lennon, Paul conceived the idea in the first place. ‘The violin backing was Paul’s idea,’ John said. ‘Jane Asher had turned him on to Vivaldi.’ Paul specified aspects of the score George Martin produced for the string arrangement which was based on Paul’s Vivaldi-inspired staccato piano: ‘I thought of the backing, but it was George Martin who finished it off,’ he said, adding ‘I just go bash, bash on the piano. He knows what I mean.’ He visited George Martin’s flat to rough out the score. ‘Paul told me he wanted the strings to be doing a rhythm,' said Martin. 'He played the piano and I played the piano, and I took a note of his music.’ Martin wrote out the string parts guided (he said) by the sound of a Bernard Herrmann film score. Paul also supervised the string recording session from the control room. His final instruction relayed via George Martin was to insist on ‘no vibrato,’ as he had done two years before for Yesterday. In his recent 'The Lyrics' Paul describes it like this: 'George Martin had introduced me to the string-quartet idea through “Yesterday.” I’d resisted the idea at first, but when it worked I fell in love with it. So I ended up writing “Eleanor Rigby” with a string component in mind. When I took the song to George, I said that, for accompaniment, I wanted a series of E-minor chord stabs. In fact, the whole song is really only two chords: C major and E minor. In George’s version of things, he conflates my idea of the stabs and his own inspiration by Bernard Herrmann, who had written the music for the movie “Psycho.” George wanted to bring some of that drama into the arrangement. And, of course, there’s some kind of madcap connection between Eleanor Rigby, an elderly woman left high and dry, and the mummified mother in “Psycho.”' [I should add that I'm very far from the first to notice memory errors in Emerick's essential but occasionally unreliable book, Here, There & Everywhere.]
Wow! I've always thought the staccato violins reminded me specifically of the shower scene from "Psycho" but figured I was reading- or should say listening- too much into it. Bernard Hermann is the obvious connection. Thanks!
I always found Father McKenzie was writing a sermon for Eleanor's funeral. Since she was alone, no one would attend the funeral, hence no one would hear the sermon.
@@art.is.life.eternal Maybe. And maybe he is also an adulterer. The option he is also lonely is never substantiated anywhere in the text with not a single reference in the lyrics he is, so what makes more sense... Father McKenzie is also lonely which is a supposition taken out of thin air with no lyrical backing, or is Father McKenzie just a regular priest who writes a sermon to a last farewell of Eleanor Rigby where nobody will come to listen to it because she was such a lonely person when she was alive, which is literally the lyrics?
No guitars, no drums, no rock keyboards. What other rock and roll band could pull this off? None! This is an example of the Beatles playing chess while all other bands were playing checkers.
When i hear the song, i think of the phrase "People living lives of quiet desperation", it's a song for everyone who never made it, never realized any dreams, never found their soul mate, never got any lucky breaks, they aren't really living, just existing. Paul saw the Darkside of that and commented on it.
Personally, I saw this song as the opposite. Both had lived full lives, and now all that they loved were gone so they only had themselves and were existing on memories.
@@ElementaryPenguin It can definitely happen that way too. People can have a great life, then become isolated for many reasons, including through illness, disability, poverty, loss of partner, children moving far away and not coming to visit, and death or moving away of friends - or a combination of any such factors. I know, because it happened to me! And I always used to puzzle over the song too, when I was young. I never in a million years thought I might end up as one of those 'lonely people'. Fortunately, I have found ways to make my life meaningful and full despite my circumstances, just as Eleanor Rigby was no doubt trying to do by being involved in some way with her local church, and keeping a sociable face in that jar by the door just in case a visitor should arrive...
@@duanevp"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation." Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience and Other Essays
@@thomaskoukouris4070 His songs are geared towards pop. John's are geared toward experimental. Harrison I don't know as much. I think he's kind of between the two? Ringo's work is mostly voice acting (Thomas the tank engine).
This was greatest deep dive into Eleanor Rigby imaginable. It’s noteworthy that in the second to last chorus they sing “Lovely People” with the more emphatic vocals. It’s to say that those lonely people are also lovable. Brilliant song. Brilliant analysis Amy. Thanks Virgin Rock
Hi Amy, I'm Marco and I'm writing to you from Italy. I've been following your channel since you opened it and I find it absolutely interesting. First of all, excuse me for the mistakes but my English is not the best. I've been a Beatles fan since I was 14, now I'm 58 and you can imagine how much I've listened to them, I couldn't wait for you to get to Revolver because as far as I'm concerned, it's from this album that the lyrics and music become more interesting. I saw the video on Taxman and I just finished Eleonor Rigby; your analyses and explanations on the musical passages are interesting and enlightening even if I'm just a terrible guitarist. I don't know if you've read Geoff Emerick's autobiography, but in that book there are explained so many technical things that he, Martin and the Beatles themselves used from Revolver to Abbey Road: for example, it was Paul who asked Geoff that the violins had to sound very "sharp" and Geoff brought the microphones very close to the instruments during the recording phase. If you want to listen to the Only Strings version, you can find it on CD 1 of Anthology 2. P.S. I'm impatient and curious about what you'll say when you get to track 14... Bye bye from Italy
One of your best reactions - well done. I think you captures all the elements of this masterpiece, including an important one as I see it: The point of having father McKenzie in the song is to have two lonely people coming to the same place in years without ever connecting. The story is that so many people pass through life without noticing each other. It's a very sad an melancholic song of missed opportunities of what life could be. And I am glad you also caught the meaning of '..was buried along with her name'. The lyrics are brilliant - so much said in so few lines, and the music match the lyrics perfectly, like you point out very clearly.
You explained it so well. Some people are skeptical when someone analyzes a piece of art, and say the reviewer reads too much into it. But many times the artist creates by instinct, and the meaning is there even if he/she didn't think of that consciously.
And then the artist reads the analysis and realizes where in themselves the art came from, even if unknown at the start. This isn't always true, but sometimes, the art is deeper than the artist knew.
This is absolutely stunning. A highly detailed, unbiased dissection and appreciation of a 60 year old piece of the soundtrack of my youth - an hour devoted to a 2 minute piece of music. A half hour passes before we get past the introduction, and I am rivited. While listening to Amy, I am convinced this is a significant event, and I'm amazed it's not been done before. Thank you.
The true genius starts with Revolver. The albums from here on in are all unique (even Let it Be). The despair and desolation at the end of this song is complete. Then the next song is so different in music and tone…and the next one, and the next one. Please, don’t miss any songs from Revolver, there is so much texture and variety.
I disagree. That genius was there from the beginning. I'm sure you're aware that every song from A Hard Day's Night was a Lennon/McCartney original. When The Beatles recorded it, John Lennon was 23 and Paul McCartney 21. The collective genius may have developed, but just consider the breadth of the songs they wrote before Revolver. What was so stunning about the early Beatles was how catchy almost all of their songs were. Just this morning, Facebook, which knows me too well, offered me a short of When I Get Home. I adore that song, and Lennon's multi tracking of the vocal is exhilarating. The guitar work and the drumming and the singing are like an absolutely wonderful assault.
@@bobtaylor170The Beatles are strange in that way. You sort of go from the highest peaks most people could imagine at the time to even higher peaks than anyone could imagine. And then you go higher. And yet it often astonishes me that after they broke up, the members all produced amazing music (even Ringo at times) but nothing that ever again had the cultural and artistic impact of what they produced together.
@@bobtaylor170I love the early stuff too but from Revolver they became a studio band and took music to a new place, using that musicality to great effect. They could always write great tunes. Many bands have been experimental but none have married that to the Beatles level of songwriting.
Hello, Virginia. I'm Brazilian, I'm 67 years old, and I've been listening to the Beatles since I was a child, because my older sister was a Beatlemaniac. Only when I was an adult and more mature did I realize how brilliant they were. I understood that Eleanor Rigby's lyrics portrayed the human loneliness created by the cosmopolitan society that emerged 6,000 years ago, when it became "sedentary" and isolationist, unlike prehistoric times, when we were "nomads - hunter-gatherers", we lived in groups and everything was for everyone. In some tribes there was not even the pronoun "I", but only "we". As I said, I'm referring to the lyrics, because I've never heard anyone explain the melody like you. I thought your explanations were brilliant. Congratulations. Olá, Virgínia. Sou brasileiro, tenho 67 anos e ouço Beatles desde criança, pois minha irmã mais velha era beatlemaníaca. Somente quando adulto e mais maduro percebi quão geniais eles foram. Entendi que a letra de Eleanor Rigby retratava a solidão humana criada pela sociedade cosmopolita surgida há 6000 anos, quando se tornou "sedentária" e isolacionista, ao contrário da pré-história, quando éramos "nômades - caçadores coletores", vivíamos em grupo e tudo era para todos. Em algumas tribos sequer havia o pronome "eu", mas apenas "nós". Como disse, refiro-me à letra, pois jamais ouvi quem explicasse a melodia como você. Achei brilhante suas explicações. Parabéns.
The quiet desperation reminds me of a William Blake poem. "I wander through each charter'd Street, near where the charter'd Thames does flow, and mark in every face I meet, marks of weakness, marks of woe.."
Re: weddings. It used to be common in the UK for women to congregate at churches for weddings, to see the spectacle, comment on the wedding dress, flowers, etc. I guess it was kind of a free show for them, where they could imagine themselves in a similar situation. Perhaps the kind of thing that a friendless spinster might yearn for.
Frank Zappa, known for his eclectic and often satirical musical style, once expressed his thoughts on The Beatles' song "Eleanor Rigby." He admired the song's composition and the way it blended classical elements with rock music. Zappa acknowledged that The Beatles' ability to integrate orchestral instruments, like the string quartet in "Eleanor Rigby," demonstrated their innovative approach to music. He also appreciated the song's dark and introspective lyrics, which were a departure from the typical pop themes of the time.
A very insightful analysis. It's amazing to see someone, on their first listen, notice aspects of this music that I've missed, even after listening to this song for most of my life. I think we often pick up on certain internal patterns in great music unconsciously when listening. It's similar to how Paul McCartney, who wrote this song without any formal knowledge of musical structure or harmony. Apparently guided by his intuition. Or whatever it is that gives someone this kind of talent,
And the First World War. A woman's expectations were marriage and children. So many men lost in the wars left women out of society even as they grieved.
Perhaps even more significantly, Eleanor Rigby would have been one of that generation of young women who had their future torn away from them, when their young husbands, lovers, and fiancés where killed in the trenches of WW I. I recall, as a child in the 1960s, the legions of older maiden aunts, who were of that generation. Eleanor Rigby was one of them, perhaps haunted by that wedding that might, in another world, have been hers along with a family.
Thank you for this, Amy. I love the way that you broke the song down and, with your classically trained ear, offered a different perspective on a classic song.
Again it was very pleasant to watch this reaction 👌😃 The intensity in this song ... you named it strikingly well. I really got goosebumps sometimes when you pointed this out ... A vivid colourful street scene ... people walking in both directions ... isolated, no connection to each others ... great description 😊👍 No place for melisma in the music, so appropriate! The eloquence of the Beatles ❤️😊👌
You've outdone yourself with this analysis. In '66, hearing this for the first time, I cried. Years later, John Prine's song ' Hello in There' evoked the same response. Cheers, --bd
I love your breakdown! That "sigh" sound of the hopes and dreams fizzling out and dissipating could also symbolize the rice falling at the wedding and the soil falling at the grave- those few moments that jump out at us amidst the monotony of our lives and seem to give us a moment of excitement or hope before drifting away.....
I interpreted the face in a jar by the door the same way you did…the face you put on to show the world as you leave your front door. Paul may have been thinking of cold cream, but the line says so much more than that.
First time viewer. A reactor who actually knows music, music theory and it's development over centuries and deep dives into contemporary masterpieces such as this. Scribed.
Eleanor Rigby redefined what so many people did with strings in rock/pop music for ages...even to this day! 50 years later when Radiohead did "Burn The Witch" they sought something to break out of the Eleanor Rigby mold and I think they managed it. Some other key string/orchestral parts in popular music that spring to mind include Moody Blues "The Night" (1967), Serge Gainsbourg's 1971 album, and Elton John's Madman Across The Water, also from 1971. Appreciate your detailed thematic analysis on this one, you had different assumptions than I did on some things that will change how I listen to this in the future!
The strings are very reminiscent of the striking ones in Psycho the Hitchcock movie from 1960. Very abrupt and striking .. which fits in with the subject matter perfectly.. distressing and stark at the same time .. genius … no one had heard this type of “pop” music in 1966 and follows on from the bitterness from Taxman perfectly
Well, that's what Paul and George Martin have said - it was Paul's sonic idea, transmitted to GM, who translated it, inspired by the famous Psycho 'stabbing' shower scene music by Bernard Herrmann, into a strings arrangement, which was then edited by Paul to get the exact sound he heard in his head.. Although I'm not entirely sure whether it was Paul or George who first got the Psycho idea...
I recall watching a TV show at the time where someone did a dramatic recitation of the lyrics to Eleanor Rigby. Reading your comment now, I believe it was Ginsberg.
I was glad to hear that, I remember when Ginsberg praised the lyrics of Dylan's A Hard Rain's a-Gonna Fall. I always wondered what he would think of some Beatles songs, since Ginsberg was interested in rock poetry.
It's expressive, it's profound, and it's also simple in its writing. And the string arrangement suit perfectly well to this lyrics. Great song by the Beatles. Thank you for this analysis. Regards from Argentina.
Not a criticism, but you never got back to the 'modal' character of the vocal melody. It goes through C# rather than the more usually expected C natural as the 6th note in the key of E minor. This means it's in the Dorian mode. Perhaps that's what Paul felt gave it a slightly exotic, maybe Eastern feel. But this mode (scale) can be heard in traditional British and Irish music, and also in some Gregorian chant, which makes an interesting connection with the characters in the song.
Revolver is a very existential album. It's about consciousness, life, death, spirituality, etc. It's extremely bold, especially at the time. Even Taxman mentions death. One extra point about Eleanor Rigby is that the high staccato strings are reminiscent of the film Psycho. Anyway, I'm keen to see what she thinks of "Got To Get You Into My Life" and "Tomorrow Never Knows", although I can't imagine her saying much about the last song's music as it stays on one chord and has lots of special effects.
You're right, but there are exceptions: Day tripper for instance ... and there you have A hard day's night : as far as I know, John wrote the whole song, and Paul sings the bridge (if you like).
I was around seven when this came out and my family had the album; this song always scared the crap out of me and, being around seven years old, I had no idea why. Your musical breakdowns are very nice to hear. Be well.
A most pleasing analysis, Amy! Eleanore Rigby is one of my fave Beatles songs and I must have listened to it over a thousand times (no exaggeration!) I gained a lot from your take, musically, of course, but also from your rather articulate "sense" of the song itself. I am enriched. My genuine thanks! 🙂
I just stumbled across your masterful deconstruction of this classic of the Beatles repertoire. As a Boomer, I remember where I was when the originality of the song struck me--standing on a dock looking out over a lake. It was not long before I hit the subscribe button, as I would like to listen to at least one of your videos a day, time permitting. The year prior to the release of Revolver 1965, the Fab 4 released an album, Rubber Soul, that brought a new level of sophistication to their music, and Revolver is in a way the culmination of that transformation. I see you have done some takes on songs from that album. The shift was prompted by the group's experience in the US tour and their decision to cease touring. Hence it was produced with far more studio time devoted to any previous album. It look forward to viewing your dissection.
I LOVE this channel. I have been a Beatles Fan my whole life. It’s so nice to have a fresh set of ears listening and analyzing their music. I love that you are following the songs and in order so we can better understand their growth. I also like that you are not reading anything BEFORE the song. Also, Howard Goodall is a composer and music historian. He had a good documentary on how the Beatles changed Pop,Rock, AND Classical music. People who like this channel will really like that documentary. Amy, you should watch it, but AFTER the 150 series is completed.
I pictured Eleanor Rigby as a very old and very poor woman, picking up the rice from a stranger's wedding to wash and cook at home. I don't imagine her as always having been alone, but rather having outlived everyone she cared about, everyone who cared about her. That she was "buried along with her name" means she had no sons, or that if she did she outlived them -- she's the last Rigby. I think it's implied that she had no daughters either. A spinster? Perhaps. A woman who lost the people she loved in the world wars? Also a possibility. I think the sermon that no one will hear is the sermon for Eleanor's funeral. No one really cares about her, not even him -- he's darning his socks while he works on the sermon rather than giving it his whole attention. "What does he care?" That's not certain, since the verse comes before the revelation that Eleanor has died. It's possible that that means his ordinary Sunday sermons fall on deaf ears, but I don't think the story has to be strictly linear. Also, there was a real Eleanor Rigby in Liverpool -- she was buried in a cemetery where John Lennon played as a child. It's possible he took Paul there when they were teenagers and Paul subconsciously remembered seeing her headstone, though his conscious reasons for choosing the name were the ones you mentioned. "Father McKenzie" was originally "Father McCartney" but they decided that didn't sound right, so Paul went through the phone book looking for other names that scanned the same.
This was a big one and I loved your reaction. Amazing what Paul and George Martin were able to do with such a simple structure. I think George Martin has earned his title as the 5th Beatle with you Amy.😉 I enjoyed your comments on the lyrics. Yeah, I don't think Father McKenzie is delivering his sermon to an empty church. It is just that they don't really hear what he is saying, and neither side connects with the other. This does bring it closer to the poetic vibe in "Sound of Silence" with people speaking without listening. Great reaction! I'm glad you enjoyed it so much and found so many things to say about it. Very nice closing words.
Top 10 song for me for sure. I always saw Eleanor Rigby as the church secretary listening to this song. Dorian mode is what I think it is. The C# in the verse melody with a song that basically has 2 chords, Em and C. How do they get away with that, and make it sound that good? A perfect string arrangement by George Martin, the movement of the violins later in the song, and using the cellos to play the melody and shadow Paul's voice in the third verse. Plus, George picks the right ensemble for the job. I've heard full orchestras play this, but the only way it sounds right to me is to do it with a string octet, and I think Paul's honest, sort of naive voice really helps here. What would be cool with a full orchestra would be if they could use this as an introduction or allegro giving the third person perspective, and have the next section be more serene music (use the flutes, woodwinds, etc.) that speaks to the woman's and the priest's first person POV of their lot in life, and then a conclusion that revisits the theme from this song and puts it all together. What really made me happy is that I was thinking of Vivaldi's "Winter" at work today, and the immediacy of the strings in that piece, and how well that portrays the desolation of winter. Thinking of this song did remind me of that, if only because it is portraying loneliness with music. String-wise, I'd always heard he wanted something that sounded like Bernard Herrmann's score for "Psycho". I prefer the comparison to Vivaldi, and apparently, I also need to start listening to more of Schubert's work. I think you are really going to like the rest of this album.
The Beatles are quite worthy of this professional-level critical analysis, and you are more than worthy of being the one to do it. This is a remarkable treasure-trove of insight and knowledge. Thank you, from a lifetime Beatles fan who is learning something new from every word you speak! I am only 20min into this, but I had to pause to comment before my thoughts moved any further along. Back to it...
Brilliant analysis, Amy. You made me see things even I didn't think of after 58 years of listening to this! Or may be I did, but never quite recognised it. Can't wait for Here, There and Everywhere!
in my own timeline of Beatle history, "Eleanor Rigby" and "Yellow Submarine," which appear on Revolver, mark the beginning of the psychedelicized Victoriana-Edwardiana of the group's middle period. Not only were the songs released, at the time of the album's release, as a double-A single; they were followed by the double-A "Penny Lane" and "Strawberry Fields," which furthered their themes and were recorded when the Sgt. Pepper project was getting under way. "Sgt. Pepper" was the period's high point (obviously) and was followed by the single of "Hello Goodbye" and the Lewis-Carroll-ish "I am the Walrus." Those two songs were included on "Magical Mystery Tour," which was released right after them and with which this period fades away. The song "Magical Mystery Tour" itself, with its psychedelicized bus trip of the kind with which, I'll guess, the Beatles were familiar in their Liverpool childhoods, is more or less the period's ending, the group's last treatment of the English life that, in a way, this music swept into history. Compare, with the "Sgt Pepper" cover, the unpsychedelic Northern England brass band at the following: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_brass_band#History From Liverpool and Manchester, in the early 1800s, came the first phase of the modern industrial world. From Liverpool again, via the Beatles, came the goodbye to it. Hello, Goodbye.
In at least one interview Paul went on the explain the ''face' in the 'jar by the door' as being cold cream. He adds "My mum’s favourite cold cream was Nivea, and I love it to this day. That’s the cold cream I was thinking of in the description... I was always a little scared by how often women used cold cream". Thanks for your detailed analysis. Earlier this morning I was checking my references for a book I have been writing relating to an aspect of Bristol's history. The reference was to the warehouse of Rigby & Evens which was certainly in the same street as the Old Vic. This afternoon your talk popped up (I'd forgotten this track was going to be next) How about that for a coincidence?!
I have always considered this song a direct response to The Rolling Stones "Paint it Black" which came out a few months earlier. Rock music started to turn away from the sunshine and rainbows and delving into real topics of real life that there is sadness, loneliness, depression and heartbreak out there.
In one of the interviews with Paul, he said that he and George Martin had discussed composer Bernard Herman with regard to the sound of the violins that they were trying to achieve. PS I wis you could see A Hard Days Night, so you could see the guys and exoerience their personalities
As always another interesting reaction. I have a few comments on the lyrics. I had read that Paul had the first two verses and wasn't sure where to go with the last verse. To sum up the storyline, supposedly he got help from his bandmates. And even though he knew it had to do with loneliness, it was George Harrison who came up with the line "look at all the lonely people". Also, Paul's original line was Father McCartney and later changed to McKenzie.
Having seen the first few minutes of this video, I can't wait to see your reaction when you finally realise the opening chord is Am, the relative minor of C! Given that the song progresses to Em, I would have laid odds on you spotting that.
It did! For the first time ever, serious music critics began to sit up and took notice. Until then, pop music was regarded with disdain, as cheap flash-in-the-pan trash for the youngsters who didn't know any better, to be discarded and forgotten tomorrow. No-one ever imagined a classical musician would be sitting down in 50 or 60 years time giving a 'pop' song serious analysis, or that people of all ages would still be listening and falling in love with it.
I watch her reactions (good on a musical level} but she doesn't have the context of the importance of one Beatles song vs another. Which ones were instant classics, and hits for all time (like Eleanor) or which ones were just good album tracks..
@@phila3884 I haven't bothered to watch many of these reactions recently because with such a wealth of brilliant Beatles songs to pick from, the choices for these YT videos (as opposed to those on her paid platforms) have been so humdrum - almost as if Vlad was picking the dullest or least consequential songs he could think of for her to analyse. Of course, it could just be me - perhaps others' taste is different. I found the same with the Queen selections.
Scored by George Martin using a string octet, ( 4 violins, 2 violas, 2 cellos, ) he referenced Bernard Herrmann's Psycho music for the staccato quality. Paul wrote the song with lyrical input from John, George and Ringo. He is the main vocal with harmonies by John and George. An astonishing entry on the Revolver album. Influenced many other groups to utilize orchestral instruments, ( Rolling Stones' Ruby Tuesday for instance. ) Brilliant!😊😊😊
It's worth 3 minutes of anyone's time to listen to the strings-only Eleanor Rigby on the Beatles Anthology, where you can really appreciate the stark minimalism of George Martin's arrangement.
What I love about this song and the with the time you spent on the intro is like the saying, " you had me at hello". The intro grabs the attention and you have to learn more. Thank you. Great review.
I think the lyric: "wearing a face that she keeps in a jar by the door", perfectly explains a person like the Milkman, Postman, Rent Collector. . . Etc calling to be paid, so before she opens the door, she dons a happy face as she speaks to the caller and pays the bill but after closing the door her happy face turns sorrowful again.
"Eleanor Rigby" has always made me sad for them both. It's a melancholy song. Maybe Eleanor didn't put herself out, maybe she was shy, perhaps she was aloof, and therefore no one knew her as a person with a soul. She did all the "right" things as a member of society--that's the face that she keeps in a jar---a facade. I have heard many sermons from a Father McKinsey-type preacher---sermons that don't move the soul, that doesn't inspire, that doesn't move one to be a better person. Amy, I had watched your analysis of "Sound of Silence" and responded by saying if you liked that one, you'll like this one. So happy that you made a reference to it. One thing to remember about the Beatles is that they were so so powerful by this time that they could command pretty much whatever they wanted in the studio and they could record whatever they wanted as well. Going forward you'll hear lots of different types of music from them. Paul McCartney lived in London and would go out at night to the clubs and soak in all sorts of music and used it as inspiration.George Harrison had a growing interest in Indian music. John Lennon's favorite novelist was Lewis Carroll---he loved the play on words, painting a picture with words, making up words. It is no mistake that The Beatles were and are the Greatest of All Time.
This is an iconic song within the Beatles oeuvre, and obviously one many of us had been waiting for you to hear, Amy. Also, because this DOES pre-date "She's Leaving Home" it lends weight to arguments that 'Revolver' was the *real* turning point of innovation for the Beatles, rather than 'Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band'. I'll also just add that, re: Paul's commentary on the declining place of the church in people's lives, this is also around the time that John got into hot water because of an interview he'd recently given where he made the remark that -- from his perspective -- the Beatles seemed to have displaced religion as the main influence in young people's lives. The click-bait headline quote the media used was "The Beatles are bigger than Jesus", although of course it was far more nuanced than that. But that didn't stop the Bible Belt in America (including places like Nashville) from going apoplectic, leading to book and album burnings, threats by the KKK, etc. It was a turning point in the Beatles' popularity in the USA that made their decision to give up touring that much easier.
25 minutes on the first 10 seconds of the song - amazing
3 месяца назад+2
McCartney can write in any and every style. Think of the Bossa Nova 'Step Inside Love' -he set out specifically to write a Bossa Nova. Think of Blackbird . He set out to write an Air On A G String inspired song around a G string drone mix. His Liverpool Oratorio never gets mentioned, he just got Carl Davis to write the dots. Let Me Roll It is pure Blues. Helter Skelter is Heavy Rock. Lots of songs have church music influenced chord movements.
It has been said that Paul wanted the microphone very close to the cellos to get that biting sound. The tradition was to place the microphones well away from the players. This caused consternation in the Abbey Road engineers.
Yes, they famously kept pushing the mics away. I think their reaction is what led to stories that the classical musicians were snotty and condescending to The Beatles. The Revolver outtakes released in 2022 show that was not at all the case. The musicians were very much engaged. I think the close mics are probably the origin of those stories. Geoff Emerick was barely 20 years old and he was, as far as these professional musicians were concerned, setting up the mics all wrong. They likely were somewhat condescending to him and were definitely not entirely cooperative. But Emerick knew exactly what he wanted and his method is now so standard we no longer even recognize the strangeness of the sound he produced.
@@patricknelson5151that just might be my favorite outtake out of all the sets and the Anthology. Just being a fly on the wall listening to Paul, George Martin and the musicians work through the arrangement. It was cooperative and collaborative. I could have listen to the whole session!
I have been soooo looking forward to this one!!!!! P.S. I am really looking forward to you getting back into Led Zeppelin as well. The Rain Song is going to be so much fun! Peace
You asked why she was there in the church where a wedding had been, the lady was probably someone who helped out in the church, cleaning up, doing the flowers etc, making sure all was as it should be, especially after funerals, weddings, christenings etc The choice of words in this song is so clever, it’s poetic, and it’s interesting how sensitive to issues such as isolation and loneliness Paul was at quite a young age
I also thought she might be living in quite dire poverty (which can often contribute to isolation and loneliness) and therefore she was gathering up the rice the guests had thrown, to take home to wash and cook for herself to eat.
My understanding is that this was in the Dorian mode. And 1 violinist used - but recorded 3 times. That gave some "volume". Of course, if auto-tune had been used, that would have killed it totally 🙂
Based on analysis I have encountered elsewhere, the song switches between an Aeolian mode and a Dorian mode, which gives the song a vaguely Medieval sound. As for the octet, there was no double tracking or overdubs of the octet on this song. The octet was recorded live in the studio under the direction of George Martin with all four Beatles present. There is a recording of the octet working with Martin and McCartney on the Revolver Super Deluxe edition, which came out in 2022. You may be recalling other times that orchestra overdubs were used. For example, McCartney wanted a 90 piece orchestra on A Day in the Life but that was too expensive; only a 40 piece orchestra was available. So, according to the George Martin biography, Sound Pictures, McCartney did two takes with the orchestra and overlaid the two takes to artificially increase the size of the orchestra. According to Wikipedia, pulling from Ian McDonald’s research, the octet on “Eleanor Rigby” was made up of the following musicians: Tony Gilbert - violin Sidney Sax - violin John Sharpe - violin Juergen Hess - violin Stephen Shingles - viola John Underwood - viola Derek Simpson - cello Norman Jones - cello
I think it was this song that got english language teachers in England setting Beatles songs for their classes to analyse. Your reaction and analysis deserves an A++ Keep Reacting!
Amy did a great job here with some of the technical nuances etc., but I find Howard Goodall's breakdown of Eleanor Rigby to be the most moving that you will ever hear: ruclips.net/video/ZQS91wVdvYc/видео.htmlsi=Z7Gx1wNH7BkNLmJB&t=1738
As soon as i saw you were doing this i was like I can't wait for your reaction to this. And i was correct. It took me a while to truly appreciate this song . But i knew there was something special about it.
This is the first time, as far as I can recall, that I have seen you get stuck on the first line of a song for 15 minutes. I realised as I listened to you explaining the 4 bars you had heard, that we hadn't gotten past the first line "Ah, look at all the lonely people" and I think this must have profoundly touched you in some way. Great work.
Love to see you just do a straight reaction and smiles. At first I thought you were milking it ( 25 minutes )....but then I smiled, realized your love of strings and orchestration. Made me continue.... From west coast Canada 🇨🇦, peace. ( ps. Love to hear more, by ear harp playing to the songs reacted! ).
I've been waiting for you to hear this one. To me this is an absolute masterpiece, both as a very expressive song about a very particular state of so many human beings (I grew up among such elderly, lonely people) and technically, every bit of the accompaniment (If we can call it simply an accompaniment) is what is should be. And there's a lot of finesse, small, yummy contrapuntal moments that I enjoy so much! It does make me sad indeed. But then so does Mahler - although in a very different sense. But that's one of the jobs of all art isn't it? Often it can and should turn our world upside down, make us sad or mad or question our own thoughts and beliefs. Rock music does that more often than not, that's part of why I love it. Maybe the Czech writer Bohumil Hrabal was right when he said: “No book worth its salt is meant to put you to sleep, it's meant to make you jump out of your bed in your underwear and run and beat the author's brains out.”
lol! 😀 I had a Czech visual artist friend who would probably have felt something of that sort about art in general. Those crazy Bohemians... I'll admit I do have some books though, that I treasure specifically because of their soothing, drifting quality, to read after the laptop goes off before going to sleep. Puts the brainwaves and nervous system into a more spacious, less focused pattern. It doesn't have to be dumb, just another form of the writers' craft.
I really enjoyed your analysis of this piece. You have great insight and really bought this piece to life for me. The Beatles are simply the best and hopefully after your journey through their music you will agree with Vlad and me!
"I have a hard time calling this piece rock music." Well there it is, you have unlocked the rest of what you will hear from the Beatles. First they mastered rock & roll music. Then through their inventive music and creative lyrics they broadened the definition wider and wider. "I didn't know you could do that in a rock song." You couldn't - not until the Beatles knocked down the walls. The Queen songs you have come to love would not have happened if the Beatles hadn't joyfully broken the rules of what a pop song could be. Through their example, breaking the rules became one of the defining characteristics of the genre.
Good write-up.
Well said!
Exactly. I have watched many of Amý´s videos. She really knows her stuff and she provides lots of interesting insights. But very ofted she lacks historical perspective. You need to know what pop music was like and how it was produced when the Beatles started. You just cannot apply the same standards to an early Beatles song and to Queen songs written ten years later. Without the Beatles´ revolution that music may have never been written.
Beatlesque became the word for it.
We've all heard the phrase: "The Rolling Stones are the greatest Rock-n-Roll band ever." And I agree. The Beatles transcend that. McCartney once called the Stones the greatest cover band in history. He said: "We always wanted to cast a wider net." Understatement.
Paul and John commented that George Martin earlier had taught them that you could use the chorus for the intro and it was a lesson they never forgot
I think they did it first on She Loves You... definitely had great impact. Explosive!
her video is too chopped up ---- technical and correct and totally unenjoyable.
@@odurandina I'm guessing it might be that content/copyright would take down any lengthy Beatles segment so they had to record this one this way. I agree with your sentiment but that's my theory.
I think using the chorus for the intro sets up the main theme of the song. Then, you get a specific example of that theme (Elenore Rigby herself) which can be fleshed out. Then the chorus can come back in to remind us of what the song is about.
In 1972 I was in the 8th grade - and my young English teacher was teaching us poetry - using Eleanor Rigby as an example. When she got to the part where Eleanor *_puts on a face that she keeps in a jar by the door_* - our teacher started crying - I mean really crying. The room was deathly silent as she composed herself - and as I sat there - Eleanor Rigby became one of the favorite songs of my life - because I got it - lyrics mean things.
Wow, thanks for sharing. I’m also proud to have been taught Eleanor Rigby in 7th grade (in 2003). Our teachers knew what was up!
Recorded 12 days before Paul McCartney's 24th birthday. He was 23 years old when he wrote it..
Gawd...and while he stands unique in that era, he had a BUNCH of 23-year-olds in his 'industry' in those years. I hope we still have those. I always wondered how Paul wrote this song - I assume "on the piano" - but he had access to cellos and violins IF he wanted. And for more experienced fingers, he had George Martin who I credit with final orchestration.
But the Beatles wrong the song
her video is too chopped up ---- technical and correct and totally unenjoyable.
@@odurandina Yes, I can understand why you don't find her videos enjoyable.
When Paul started recording Sgt Pepper, the Beatles 8th album, he was still only 24 years old.
He began recording Rubber Soul, Revolver and Sgt Pepper between the ages of 23 and 24.
It's outrageous.
your innocent, heartfelt analysis is truly touching. you remind me of my sister. she was a principal cellist in several orchestras (until she passed away a year ago), and the strings used to make her cry because of the simple energy, beauty, and harmonics. i'm getting tears hearing you explicate those beautiful details in her absence. thank you Amy.
This song is great in every possible way. Here and gone in 2 minutes and a few seconds. Loved your reaction. The background info was excellent. This song is one of The Beatles' songs that got EVERYBODY'S respect from around the world of music.
I put it in the top songs of the 20th century at least. Possibly Paul’s best work, though I don’t like to try numeric ranks for creative works.
I think Roger Waters would respect and admire not only this song, but also Amy's brilliant analysis of and commentary on it. This universal need for connection and belonging inspires so much of Roger's lyrical composition and, here, Paul's unique and multifaceted songwriting skills. Amy's masterful, deep dive into Elanor's (and Father Mac's) story interestingly links these two artists.
I was convinced I wouldn't listen to nearly an hour of review on a 3 min song.
Yet I did listen to it all. Shows how little I knew !
Hello EVERYONE, with Amy's first listen We Are All Together.😊
OK, 8 minutes in and I have to interject something important concerning the quote from engineer Geoff Emerick. Emerick is mistaken here and contradicts every other authoritative first hand source when he describes George Martin suggesting strings and having to persuade a reluctant McCartney. *Emerick here conflates the story of Yesterday with the storty of Eleanor Rigby." That;'s exactly what happened with Yesterday in 1965, right down to the detail of Paul fearing it could be "too lush, too Mancini [sic. Mantovani]". The story with Eleanor Rigby as told by John Lennon, by George Martin, and by Paul himelf, is quite different:
According to John Lennon, Paul conceived the idea in the first place. ‘The violin backing was Paul’s idea,’ John said. ‘Jane Asher had turned him on to Vivaldi.’ Paul specified aspects of the score George Martin produced for the string arrangement which was based on Paul’s Vivaldi-inspired staccato piano: ‘I thought of the backing, but it was George Martin who finished it off,’ he said, adding ‘I just go bash, bash on the piano. He knows what I mean.’ He visited George Martin’s flat to rough out the score. ‘Paul told me he wanted the strings to be doing a rhythm,' said Martin. 'He played the piano and I played the piano, and I took a note of his music.’ Martin wrote out the string parts guided (he said) by the sound of a Bernard Herrmann film score. Paul also supervised the string recording session from the control room. His final instruction relayed via George Martin was to insist on ‘no vibrato,’ as he had done two years before for Yesterday.
In his recent 'The Lyrics' Paul describes it like this:
'George Martin had introduced me to the string-quartet idea through “Yesterday.” I’d resisted the idea at first, but when it worked I fell in love with it. So I ended up writing “Eleanor Rigby” with a string component in mind. When I took the song to George, I said that, for accompaniment, I wanted a series of E-minor chord stabs. In fact, the whole song is really only two chords: C major and E minor. In George’s version of things, he conflates my idea of the stabs and his own inspiration by Bernard Herrmann, who had written the music for the movie “Psycho.” George wanted to bring some of that drama into the arrangement. And, of course, there’s some kind of madcap connection between Eleanor Rigby, an elderly woman left high and dry, and the mummified mother in “Psycho.”'
[I should add that I'm very far from the first to notice memory errors in Emerick's essential but occasionally unreliable book, Here, There & Everywhere.]
Well interjected!
Appreciated, but FYI your second paragraph was quoted by Amy herself in this video. She made note of the conflicting stories.
@@Johnny_Socko Yes. Sorry. A case of premature interjection! But I think it helps to understand why Emerick's account is confused.
Wow! I've always thought the staccato violins reminded me specifically of the shower scene from "Psycho" but figured I was reading- or should say listening- too much into it. Bernard Hermann is the obvious connection. Thanks!
I always found Father McKenzie was writing a sermon for Eleanor's funeral. Since she was alone, no one would attend the funeral, hence no one would hear the sermon.
I was going to say the same thing.
Writing sermon in mind not on paper.
"Father McKenzie, writing the words to a sermon that no one would hear."
Or is Father Mckenzie ALSO a "lonely person?" Maybe both things are true...
@@art.is.life.eternal Maybe. And maybe he is also an adulterer. The option he is also lonely is never substantiated anywhere in the text with not a single reference in the lyrics he is, so what makes more sense...
Father McKenzie is also lonely which is a supposition taken out of thin air with no lyrical backing, or is Father McKenzie just a regular priest who writes a sermon to a last farewell of Eleanor Rigby where nobody will come to listen to it because she was such a lonely person when she was alive, which is literally the lyrics?
Of all the Beatles' songs I think this one would be the most appreciated by a Classical musician.
"Because" is a serious contender
That's why she's reacting to it. As if it's her first time hearing it though, give me a break! People lie so freely these days.
No guitars, no drums, no rock keyboards. What other rock and roll band could pull this off? None! This is an example of the Beatles playing chess while all other bands were playing checkers.
Draughts lol.
You'd like Radiohead for the same reason. Listen to Pyramid Song and How to Dissappear Completely.
When i hear the song, i think of the phrase "People living lives of quiet desperation", it's a song for everyone who never made it, never realized any dreams, never found their soul mate, never got any lucky breaks, they aren't really living, just existing. Paul saw the Darkside of that and commented on it.
Personally, I saw this song as the opposite. Both had lived full lives, and now all that they loved were gone so they only had themselves and were existing on memories.
"Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way. The time is gone. The song is over. Thought I'd something more to say." :)
@@ElementaryPenguin It can definitely happen that way too. People can have a great life, then become isolated for many reasons, including through illness, disability, poverty, loss of partner, children moving far away and not coming to visit, and death or moving away of friends - or a combination of any such factors. I know, because it happened to me! And I always used to puzzle over the song too, when I was young. I never in a million years thought I might end up as one of those 'lonely people'. Fortunately, I have found ways to make my life meaningful and full despite my circumstances, just as Eleanor Rigby was no doubt trying to do by being involved in some way with her local church, and keeping a sociable face in that jar by the door just in case a visitor should arrive...
I like how the priests life was equally empty, at least that's how I Interpret it.
@@duanevp"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation. What is called resignation is confirmed desperation."
Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience and Other Essays
Paul sitting in ‘Eleanor Rigby’s’ kitchen listening to her stories …… and that’s why Paul has always been my favorite Beatle ✌🏼
Like Beaver Cleaver and Gus the fireman?
He always sounds like a nice guy.
his songs compared to john and george are so much worse imo
@@thomaskoukouris4070 His songs are geared towards pop. John's are geared toward experimental. Harrison I don't know as much. I think he's kind of between the two? Ringo's work is mostly voice acting (Thomas the tank engine).
@@thomaskoukouris4070 LOL...sure.
This was greatest deep dive into Eleanor Rigby imaginable. It’s noteworthy that in the second to last chorus they sing “Lovely People” with the more emphatic vocals. It’s to say that those lonely people are also lovable. Brilliant song. Brilliant analysis Amy. Thanks Virgin Rock
Hi Amy, I'm Marco and I'm writing to you from Italy. I've been following your channel since you opened it and I find it absolutely interesting. First of all, excuse me for the mistakes but my English is not the best. I've been a Beatles fan since I was 14, now I'm 58 and you can imagine how much I've listened to them, I couldn't wait for you to get to Revolver because as far as I'm concerned, it's from this album that the lyrics and music become more interesting. I saw the video on Taxman and I just finished Eleonor Rigby; your analyses and explanations on the musical passages are interesting and enlightening even if I'm just a terrible guitarist.
I don't know if you've read Geoff Emerick's autobiography, but in that book there are explained so many technical things that he, Martin and the Beatles themselves used from Revolver to Abbey Road: for example, it was Paul who asked Geoff that the violins had to sound very "sharp" and Geoff brought the microphones very close to the instruments during the recording phase.
If you want to listen to the Only Strings version, you can find it on CD 1 of Anthology 2.
P.S. I'm impatient and curious about what you'll say when you get to track 14...
Bye bye from Italy
One of your best reactions - well done. I think you captures all the elements of this masterpiece, including an important one as I see it: The point of having father McKenzie in the song is to have two lonely people coming to the same place in years without ever connecting. The story is that so many people pass through life without noticing each other. It's a very sad an melancholic song of missed opportunities of what life could be. And I am glad you also caught the meaning of '..was buried along with her name'. The lyrics are brilliant - so much said in so few lines, and the music match the lyrics perfectly, like you point out very clearly.
You explained it so well. Some people are skeptical when someone analyzes a piece of art, and say the reviewer reads too much into it. But many times the artist creates by instinct, and the meaning is there even if he/she didn't think of that consciously.
And then the artist reads the analysis and realizes where in themselves the art came from, even if unknown at the start. This isn't always true, but sometimes, the art is deeper than the artist knew.
I've cherished the intense feelings of this lyrical tale since I was a kid in 1966. Thanks for letting us know what makes it great.
This is absolutely stunning. A highly detailed, unbiased dissection and appreciation of a 60 year old piece of the soundtrack of my youth - an hour devoted to a 2 minute piece of music. A half hour passes before we get past the introduction, and I am rivited. While listening to Amy, I am convinced this is a significant event, and I'm amazed it's not been done before. Thank you.
The true genius starts with Revolver. The albums from here on in are all unique (even Let it Be). The despair and desolation at the end of this song is complete. Then the next song is so different in music and tone…and the next one, and the next one. Please, don’t miss any songs from Revolver, there is so much texture and variety.
I disagree. That genius was there from the beginning. I'm sure you're aware that every song from A Hard Day's Night was a Lennon/McCartney original. When The Beatles recorded it, John Lennon was 23 and Paul McCartney 21. The collective genius may have developed, but just consider the breadth of the songs they wrote before Revolver. What was so stunning about the early Beatles was how catchy almost all of their songs were. Just this morning, Facebook, which knows me too well, offered me a short of When I Get Home. I adore that song, and Lennon's multi tracking of the vocal is exhilarating. The guitar work and the drumming and the singing are like an absolutely wonderful assault.
@@bobtaylor170The Beatles are strange in that way. You sort of go from the highest peaks most people could imagine at the time to even higher peaks than anyone could imagine. And then you go higher. And yet it often astonishes me that after they broke up, the members all produced amazing music (even Ringo at times) but nothing that ever again had the cultural and artistic impact of what they produced together.
@@patricknelson5151 very true! It's freakish that they did what they did, nothing less.
@@bobtaylor170I love the early stuff too but from Revolver they became a studio band and took music to a new place, using that musicality to great effect. They could always write great tunes. Many bands have been experimental but none have married that to the Beatles level of songwriting.
@@jenscee7679 , true. Our only difference is that I maintain that most of their early songs show that genius.
This is closer to a podcast than a music reaction. Fantastic job.
Hello, Virginia. I'm Brazilian, I'm 67 years old, and I've been listening to the Beatles since I was a child, because my older sister was a Beatlemaniac. Only when I was an adult and more mature did I realize how brilliant they were. I understood that Eleanor Rigby's lyrics portrayed the human loneliness created by the cosmopolitan society that emerged 6,000 years ago, when it became "sedentary" and isolationist, unlike prehistoric times, when we were "nomads - hunter-gatherers", we lived in groups and everything was for everyone. In some tribes there was not even the pronoun "I", but only "we". As I said, I'm referring to the lyrics, because I've never heard anyone explain the melody like you. I thought your explanations were brilliant. Congratulations.
Olá, Virgínia. Sou brasileiro, tenho 67 anos e ouço Beatles desde criança, pois minha irmã mais velha era beatlemaníaca. Somente quando adulto e mais maduro percebi quão geniais eles foram. Entendi que a letra de Eleanor Rigby retratava a solidão humana criada pela sociedade cosmopolita surgida há 6000 anos, quando se tornou "sedentária" e isolacionista, ao contrário da pré-história, quando éramos "nômades - caçadores coletores", vivíamos em grupo e tudo era para todos. Em algumas tribos sequer havia o pronome "eu", mas apenas "nós". Como disse, refiro-me à letra, pois jamais ouvi quem explicasse a melodia como você. Achei brilhante suas explicações. Parabéns.
When your video spends twenty five minutes in the first seven seconds of a song, you know that song is special. 😁
this lady does go on and on.
The quiet desperation reminds me of a William Blake poem. "I wander through each charter'd Street, near where the charter'd Thames does flow, and mark in every face I meet, marks of weakness, marks of woe.."
Solidarity brother.
Re: weddings. It used to be common in the UK for women to congregate at churches for weddings, to see the spectacle, comment on the wedding dress, flowers, etc. I guess it was kind of a free show for them, where they could imagine themselves in a similar situation. Perhaps the kind of thing that a friendless spinster might yearn for.
Frank Zappa, known for his eclectic and often satirical musical style, once expressed his thoughts on The Beatles' song "Eleanor Rigby." He admired the song's composition and the way it blended classical elements with rock music. Zappa acknowledged that The Beatles' ability to integrate orchestral instruments, like the string quartet in "Eleanor Rigby," demonstrated their innovative approach to music. He also appreciated the song's dark and introspective lyrics, which were a departure from the typical pop themes of the time.
A very insightful analysis. It's amazing to see someone, on their first listen, notice aspects of this music that I've missed, even after listening to this song for most of my life. I think we often pick up on certain internal patterns in great music unconsciously when listening. It's similar to how Paul McCartney, who wrote this song without any formal knowledge of musical structure or harmony. Apparently guided by his intuition. Or whatever it is that gives someone this kind of talent,
This was written in the 1960s, only 20years after the end on WWII. Many people were still afftected by loss of loved ones, or the Blitz...
And the First World War. A woman's expectations were marriage and children. So many men lost in the wars left women out of society even as they grieved.
Perhaps even more significantly, Eleanor Rigby would have been one of that generation of young women who had their future torn away from them, when their young husbands, lovers, and fiancés where killed in the trenches of WW I. I recall, as a child in the 1960s, the legions of older maiden aunts, who were of that generation. Eleanor Rigby was one of them, perhaps haunted by that wedding that might, in another world, have been hers along with a family.
Thank you for this, Amy. I love the way that you broke the song down and, with your classically trained ear, offered a different perspective on a classic song.
Again it was very pleasant to watch this reaction 👌😃 The intensity in this song ... you named it strikingly well. I really got goosebumps sometimes when you pointed this out ...
A vivid colourful street scene ... people walking in both directions ... isolated, no connection to each others ... great description 😊👍 No place for melisma in the music, so appropriate! The eloquence of the Beatles ❤️😊👌
You've outdone yourself with this analysis. In '66, hearing this for the first time, I cried. Years later, John Prine's song ' Hello in There' evoked the same response. Cheers, --bd
I love your breakdown! That "sigh" sound of the hopes and dreams fizzling out and dissipating could also symbolize the rice falling at the wedding and the soil falling at the grave- those few moments that jump out at us amidst the monotony of our lives and seem to give us a moment of excitement or hope before drifting away.....
I interpreted the face in a jar by the door the same way you did…the face you put on to show the world as you leave your front door. Paul may have been thinking of cold cream, but the line says so much more than that.
It’s very cathartic watching your reviews. Thank you. I had tears several times.
I think I needed the connection to my past again. Cheers xx
First time viewer. A reactor who actually knows music, music theory and it's development over centuries and deep dives into contemporary masterpieces such as this. Scribed.
Eleanor Rigby redefined what so many people did with strings in rock/pop music for ages...even to this day! 50 years later when Radiohead did "Burn The Witch" they sought something to break out of the Eleanor Rigby mold and I think they managed it. Some other key string/orchestral parts in popular music that spring to mind include Moody Blues "The Night" (1967), Serge Gainsbourg's 1971 album, and Elton John's Madman Across The Water, also from 1971. Appreciate your detailed thematic analysis on this one, you had different assumptions than I did on some things that will change how I listen to this in the future!
The strings are very reminiscent of the striking ones in Psycho the Hitchcock movie from 1960. Very abrupt and striking .. which fits in with the subject matter perfectly.. distressing and stark at the same time .. genius … no one had heard this type of “pop” music in 1966 and follows on from the bitterness from Taxman perfectly
Great comment ✌🏼
Awesome comment 👍😊
Very well put, you have a great musical mind there my friend 😊 👍
Well, that's what Paul and George Martin have said - it was Paul's sonic idea, transmitted to GM, who translated it, inspired by the famous Psycho 'stabbing' shower scene music by Bernard Herrmann, into a strings arrangement, which was then edited by Paul to get the exact sound he heard in his head.. Although I'm not entirely sure whether it was Paul or George who first got the Psycho idea...
Scored by the legendary composer Bernard Herrman, whose final score was for the movie "Taxi Driver" starring Robert DeNiro.
The Beatles are their own genre.
Absolutely! It's called Beatlesque!🌹👍
Well said!
@@koralart Thanks! ✌️
Paul recalled the look of horror on the string players’ faces when they were asked to play an “add 7th” note.
Beat poet Allen Ginsberg thought very highly of this lyric. On a visit to Ezra Pound in Rapallo, Ginsberg played this for him.
I recall watching a TV show at the time where someone did a dramatic recitation of the lyrics to Eleanor Rigby. Reading your comment now, I believe it was Ginsberg.
I was glad to hear that, I remember when Ginsberg praised the lyrics of Dylan's A Hard Rain's a-Gonna Fall. I always wondered what he would think of some Beatles songs, since Ginsberg was interested in rock poetry.
It's expressive, it's profound, and it's also simple in its writing. And the string arrangement suit perfectly well to this lyrics.
Great song by the Beatles. Thank you for this analysis.
Regards from Argentina.
Not a criticism, but you never got back to the 'modal' character of the vocal melody. It goes through C# rather than the more usually expected C natural as the 6th note in the key of E minor. This means it's in the Dorian mode. Perhaps that's what Paul felt gave it a slightly exotic, maybe Eastern feel. But this mode (scale) can be heard in traditional British and Irish music, and also in some Gregorian chant, which makes an interesting connection with the characters in the song.
Revolver is a very existential album. It's about consciousness, life, death, spirituality, etc. It's extremely bold, especially at the time. Even Taxman mentions death. One extra point about Eleanor Rigby is that the high staccato strings are reminiscent of the film Psycho. Anyway, I'm keen to see what she thinks of "Got To Get You Into My Life" and "Tomorrow Never Knows", although I can't imagine her saying much about the last song's music as it stays on one chord and has lots of special effects.
Death. Taxes. Existence
A little tip about Beatles songs, the writer is as far as I can tell, is always the singer 😊
Almost always…but John and Paul wrote songs for George and Ringo to sing as well.
You're right, but there are exceptions: Day tripper for instance ... and there you have A hard day's night : as far as I know, John wrote the whole song, and Paul sings the bridge (if you like).
@@fernandodeleon7466 they did each other's middle 8's often. Same with Day in the Life, it's a John song, but Paul does the bridge.
@@jimchabai3163 for sure, but in that case Paul wrote the bridge
I was around seven when this came out and my family had the album; this song always scared the crap out of me and, being around seven years old, I had no idea why. Your musical breakdowns are very nice to hear. Be well.
A most pleasing analysis, Amy! Eleanore Rigby is one of my fave Beatles songs and I must have listened to it over a thousand times (no exaggeration!) I gained a lot from your take, musically, of course, but also from your rather articulate "sense" of the song itself. I am enriched. My genuine thanks! 🙂
"There will be time to prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet" TS Eliot
"Wearing the face that she keeps in a jar by the door..." -- McCartney
And which is the better line? I know my choice.
I just stumbled across your masterful deconstruction of this classic of the Beatles repertoire. As a Boomer, I remember where I was when the originality of the song struck me--standing on a dock looking out over a lake. It was not long before I hit the subscribe button, as I would like to listen to at least one of your videos a day, time permitting. The year prior to the release of Revolver 1965, the Fab 4 released an album, Rubber Soul, that brought a new level of sophistication to their music, and Revolver is in a way the culmination of that transformation. I see you have done some takes on songs from that album. The shift was prompted by the group's experience in the US tour and their decision to cease touring. Hence it was produced with far more studio time devoted to any previous album. It look forward to viewing your dissection.
Sir Paul is out of this world .He's a pure genius .
I have always loved your musical knowledge as you cover the Beatles music and so pleased you can now play the track again x
I LOVE this channel. I have been a Beatles Fan my whole life. It’s so nice to have a fresh set of ears listening and analyzing their music. I love that you are following the songs and in order so we can better understand their growth. I also like that you are not reading anything BEFORE the song.
Also, Howard Goodall is a composer and music historian. He had a good documentary on how the Beatles changed Pop,Rock, AND Classical music.
People who like this channel will really like that documentary.
Amy, you should watch it, but AFTER the 150 series is completed.
I pictured Eleanor Rigby as a very old and very poor woman, picking up the rice from a stranger's wedding to wash and cook at home. I don't imagine her as always having been alone, but rather having outlived everyone she cared about, everyone who cared about her. That she was "buried along with her name" means she had no sons, or that if she did she outlived them -- she's the last Rigby. I think it's implied that she had no daughters either. A spinster? Perhaps. A woman who lost the people she loved in the world wars? Also a possibility.
I think the sermon that no one will hear is the sermon for Eleanor's funeral. No one really cares about her, not even him -- he's darning his socks while he works on the sermon rather than giving it his whole attention. "What does he care?" That's not certain, since the verse comes before the revelation that Eleanor has died. It's possible that that means his ordinary Sunday sermons fall on deaf ears, but I don't think the story has to be strictly linear.
Also, there was a real Eleanor Rigby in Liverpool -- she was buried in a cemetery where John Lennon played as a child. It's possible he took Paul there when they were teenagers and Paul subconsciously remembered seeing her headstone, though his conscious reasons for choosing the name were the ones you mentioned. "Father McKenzie" was originally "Father McCartney" but they decided that didn't sound right, so Paul went through the phone book looking for other names that scanned the same.
This was a big one and I loved your reaction. Amazing what Paul and George Martin were able to do with such a simple structure. I think George Martin has earned his title as the 5th Beatle with you Amy.😉 I enjoyed your comments on the lyrics. Yeah, I don't think Father McKenzie is delivering his sermon to an empty church. It is just that they don't really hear what he is saying, and neither side connects with the other. This does bring it closer to the poetic vibe in "Sound of Silence" with people speaking without listening. Great reaction! I'm glad you enjoyed it so much and found so many things to say about it. Very nice closing words.
Top 10 song for me for sure. I always saw Eleanor Rigby as the church secretary listening to this song.
Dorian mode is what I think it is. The C# in the verse melody with a song that basically has 2 chords, Em and C. How do they get away with that, and make it sound that good? A perfect string arrangement by George Martin, the movement of the violins later in the song, and using the cellos to play the melody and shadow Paul's voice in the third verse. Plus, George picks the right ensemble for the job. I've heard full orchestras play this, but the only way it sounds right to me is to do it with a string octet, and I think Paul's honest, sort of naive voice really helps here. What would be cool with a full orchestra would be if they could use this as an introduction or allegro giving the third person perspective, and have the next section be more serene music (use the flutes, woodwinds, etc.) that speaks to the woman's and the priest's first person POV of their lot in life, and then a conclusion that revisits the theme from this song and puts it all together.
What really made me happy is that I was thinking of Vivaldi's "Winter" at work today, and the immediacy of the strings in that piece, and how well that portrays the desolation of winter. Thinking of this song did remind me of that, if only because it is portraying loneliness with music. String-wise, I'd always heard he wanted something that sounded like Bernard Herrmann's score for "Psycho". I prefer the comparison to Vivaldi, and apparently, I also need to start listening to more of Schubert's work.
I think you are really going to like the rest of this album.
One of the five favorites of all Beatles songs.
Same ✌🏼
Me too. It feels like I've walked into a room of people having intense conversations. A humming cacophony of different voices, confused and stressed.
Love it!
A masterpiece!! Thank you very much for another excellent reaction/analysis Amy. Thanks Vlad!
The Beatles are quite worthy of this professional-level critical analysis, and you are more than worthy of being the one to do it. This is a remarkable treasure-trove of insight and knowledge. Thank you, from a lifetime Beatles fan who is learning something new from every word you speak! I am only 20min into this, but I had to pause to comment before my thoughts moved any further along. Back to it...
Brilliant analysis, Amy. You made me see things even I didn't think of after 58 years of listening to this! Or may be I did, but never quite recognised it. Can't wait for Here, There and Everywhere!
Mesmerising video!!!! Thanks a lot; you make my days always better!!!!
in my own timeline of Beatle history, "Eleanor Rigby" and "Yellow Submarine," which appear on Revolver, mark the beginning of the psychedelicized Victoriana-Edwardiana of the group's middle period. Not only were the songs released, at the time of the album's release, as a double-A single; they were followed by the double-A "Penny Lane" and "Strawberry Fields," which furthered their themes and were recorded when the Sgt. Pepper project was getting under way. "Sgt. Pepper" was the period's high point (obviously) and was followed by the single of "Hello Goodbye" and the Lewis-Carroll-ish "I am the Walrus." Those two songs were included on "Magical Mystery Tour," which was released right after them and with which this period fades away. The song "Magical Mystery Tour" itself, with its psychedelicized bus trip of the kind with which, I'll guess, the Beatles were familiar in their Liverpool childhoods, is more or less the period's ending, the group's last treatment of the English life that, in a way, this music swept into history. Compare, with the "Sgt Pepper" cover, the unpsychedelic Northern England brass band at the following:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_brass_band#History
From Liverpool and Manchester, in the early 1800s, came the first phase of the modern industrial world. From Liverpool again, via the Beatles, came the goodbye to it. Hello, Goodbye.
In at least one interview Paul went on the explain the ''face' in the 'jar by the door' as being cold cream. He adds "My mum’s favourite cold cream was Nivea, and I love it to this day. That’s the cold cream I was thinking of in the description... I was always a little scared by how often women used cold cream". Thanks for your detailed analysis. Earlier this morning I was checking my references for a book I have been writing relating to an aspect of Bristol's history. The reference was to the warehouse of Rigby & Evens which was certainly in the same street as the Old Vic. This afternoon your talk popped up (I'd forgotten this track was going to be next) How about that for a coincidence?!
from that era my mother used Ponds cold cream
I have always considered this song a direct response to The Rolling Stones "Paint it Black" which came out a few months earlier. Rock music started to turn away from the sunshine and rainbows and delving into real topics of real life that there is sadness, loneliness, depression and heartbreak out there.
I always considered Paint It Black a response to Lennon's Norwegian Wood, sitar and all.
In one of the interviews with Paul, he said that he and George Martin had discussed composer Bernard Herman with regard to the sound of the violins that they were trying to achieve. PS I wis you could see A Hard Days Night, so you could see the guys and exoerience their personalities
easy beatle ID is John wrote in first person and Paul wrote in third person. Mostly.
I love this song so much. It's a masterpiece.
I was waiting for this, Amy, I had a feeling you'd connect with it.🙂
The strings are meaty, very sophisticated.
As always another interesting reaction. I have a few comments on the lyrics. I had read that Paul had the first two verses and wasn't sure where to go with the last verse. To sum up the storyline, supposedly he got help from his bandmates. And even though he knew it had to do with loneliness, it was George Harrison who came up with the line "look at all the lonely people". Also, Paul's original line was Father McCartney and later changed to McKenzie.
Having seen the first few minutes of this video, I can't wait to see your reaction when you finally realise the opening chord is Am, the relative minor of C! Given that the song progresses to Em, I would have laid odds on you spotting that.
The song that changed rock and roll - it blew everyone's mind on what rock (and pop) music could be.
It did! For the first time ever, serious music critics began to sit up and took notice. Until then, pop music was regarded with disdain, as cheap flash-in-the-pan trash for the youngsters who didn't know any better, to be discarded and forgotten tomorrow. No-one ever imagined a classical musician would be sitting down in 50 or 60 years time giving a 'pop' song serious analysis, or that people of all ages would still be listening and falling in love with it.
I watch her reactions (good on a musical level} but she doesn't have the context of the importance of one Beatles song vs another. Which ones were instant classics, and hits for all time (like Eleanor) or which ones were just good album tracks..
@@phila3884 I haven't bothered to watch many of these reactions recently because with such a wealth of brilliant Beatles songs to pick from, the choices for these YT videos (as opposed to those on her paid platforms) have been so humdrum - almost as if Vlad was picking the dullest or least consequential songs he could think of for her to analyse. Of course, it could just be me - perhaps others' taste is different. I found the same with the Queen selections.
Oh yes, and I must say I very much enjoyed your musical analyses. Reminds me of how I use to like talking with a musical friend about.
Scored by George Martin using a string octet, ( 4 violins, 2 violas, 2 cellos, ) he referenced Bernard Herrmann's Psycho music for the staccato quality. Paul wrote the song with lyrical input from John, George and Ringo. He is the main vocal with harmonies by John and George. An astonishing entry on the Revolver album. Influenced many other groups to utilize orchestral instruments, ( Rolling Stones' Ruby Tuesday for instance. ) Brilliant!😊😊😊
It's worth 3 minutes of anyone's time to listen to the strings-only Eleanor Rigby on the Beatles Anthology, where you can really appreciate the stark minimalism of George Martin's arrangement.
What I love about this song and the with the time you spent on the intro is like the saying, " you had me at hello". The intro grabs the attention and you have to learn more. Thank you. Great review.
At some point would love your perspective on the Velvet Undergroind. The band with likely the most highly trained classical musician…
I think the lyric: "wearing a face that she keeps in a jar by the door", perfectly explains a person like the Milkman, Postman, Rent Collector. . . Etc calling to be paid, so before she opens the door, she dons a happy face as she speaks to the caller and pays the bill but after closing the door her happy face turns sorrowful again.
"Eleanor Rigby" has always made me sad for them both. It's a melancholy song. Maybe Eleanor didn't put herself out, maybe she was shy, perhaps she was aloof, and therefore no one knew her as a person with a soul. She did all the "right" things as a member of society--that's the face that she keeps in a jar---a facade. I have heard many sermons from a Father McKinsey-type preacher---sermons that don't move the soul, that doesn't inspire, that doesn't move one to be a better person.
Amy, I had watched your analysis of "Sound of Silence" and responded by saying if you liked that one, you'll like this one. So happy that you made a reference to it. One thing to remember about the Beatles is that they were so so powerful by this time that they could command pretty much whatever they wanted in the studio and they could record whatever they wanted as well. Going forward you'll hear lots of different types of music from them. Paul McCartney lived in London and would go out at night to the clubs and soak in all sorts of music and used it as inspiration.George Harrison had a growing interest in Indian music. John Lennon's favorite novelist was Lewis Carroll---he loved the play on words, painting a picture with words, making up words.
It is no mistake that The Beatles were and are the Greatest of All Time.
This is an iconic song within the Beatles oeuvre, and obviously one many of us had been waiting for you to hear, Amy. Also, because this DOES pre-date "She's Leaving Home" it lends weight to arguments that 'Revolver' was the *real* turning point of innovation for the Beatles, rather than 'Sgt Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band'.
I'll also just add that, re: Paul's commentary on the declining place of the church in people's lives, this is also around the time that John got into hot water because of an interview he'd recently given where he made the remark that -- from his perspective -- the Beatles seemed to have displaced religion as the main influence in young people's lives. The click-bait headline quote the media used was "The Beatles are bigger than Jesus", although of course it was far more nuanced than that. But that didn't stop the Bible Belt in America (including places like Nashville) from going apoplectic, leading to book and album burnings, threats by the KKK, etc. It was a turning point in the Beatles' popularity in the USA that made their decision to give up touring that much easier.
25 minutes on the first 10 seconds of the song - amazing
McCartney can write in any and every style. Think of the Bossa Nova 'Step Inside Love' -he set out specifically to write a Bossa Nova.
Think of Blackbird . He set out to write an Air On A G String inspired song around a G string drone mix.
His Liverpool Oratorio never gets mentioned, he just got Carl Davis to write the dots.
Let Me Roll It is pure Blues.
Helter Skelter is Heavy Rock.
Lots of songs have church music influenced chord movements.
I can see it as rock because rock has a HUGE umbrella. That's exactly what I LOVE about rock.
It has been said that Paul wanted the microphone very close to the cellos to get that biting sound. The tradition was to place the microphones well away from the players. This caused consternation in the Abbey Road engineers.
Yes, they famously kept pushing the mics away. I think their reaction is what led to stories that the classical musicians were snotty and condescending to The Beatles. The Revolver outtakes released in 2022 show that was not at all the case. The musicians were very much engaged. I think the close mics are probably the origin of those stories. Geoff Emerick was barely 20 years old and he was, as far as these professional musicians were concerned, setting up the mics all wrong. They likely were somewhat condescending to him and were definitely not entirely cooperative. But Emerick knew exactly what he wanted and his method is now so standard we no longer even recognize the strangeness of the sound he produced.
@@patricknelson5151that just might be my favorite outtake out of all the sets and the Anthology. Just being a fly on the wall listening to Paul, George Martin and the musicians work through the arrangement.
It was cooperative and collaborative. I could have listen to the whole session!
The opening voices are of ALL the Beatles, of course in perfect harmony. 🎸♥️
that's why the beatles were great they didn't have any set format in their music which no one else at the time in rock & roll music was doing !
All three syllables are pronounced in "Durante". He was very popular in movies and TV when I was growing up.
I have been soooo looking forward to this one!!!!!
P.S. I am really looking forward to you getting back into Led Zeppelin as well. The Rain Song is going to be so much fun!
Peace
I was waiting for it!
You asked why she was there in the church where a wedding had been, the lady was probably someone who helped out in the church, cleaning up, doing the flowers etc, making sure all was as it should be, especially after funerals, weddings, christenings etc
The choice of words in this song is so clever, it’s poetic, and it’s interesting how sensitive to issues such as isolation and loneliness Paul was at quite a young age
I also thought she might be living in quite dire poverty (which can often contribute to isolation and loneliness) and therefore she was gathering up the rice the guests had thrown, to take home to wash and cook for herself to eat.
Yes, I always figured that it was her local parish church, so she would show up to any events as a matter of course.
My understanding is that this was in the Dorian mode. And 1 violinist used - but recorded 3 times. That gave some "volume". Of course, if auto-tune had been used, that would have killed it totally 🙂
Great comment
Based on analysis I have encountered elsewhere, the song switches between an Aeolian mode and a Dorian mode, which gives the song a vaguely Medieval sound. As for the octet, there was no double tracking or overdubs of the octet on this song. The octet was recorded live in the studio under the direction of George Martin with all four Beatles present. There is a recording of the octet working with Martin and McCartney on the Revolver Super Deluxe edition, which came out in 2022. You may be recalling other times that orchestra overdubs were used. For example, McCartney wanted a 90 piece orchestra on A Day in the Life but that was too expensive; only a 40 piece orchestra was available. So, according to the George Martin biography, Sound Pictures, McCartney did two takes with the orchestra and overlaid the two takes to artificially increase the size of the orchestra.
According to Wikipedia, pulling from Ian McDonald’s research, the octet on “Eleanor Rigby” was made up of the following musicians:
Tony Gilbert - violin
Sidney Sax - violin
John Sharpe - violin
Juergen Hess - violin
Stephen Shingles - viola
John Underwood - viola
Derek Simpson - cello
Norman Jones - cello
This song is in the post-WWI tradition, similar to The Wasteland, that focus on the alienation of modern life. It is beyond pop culture.
I think it was this song that got english language teachers in England setting Beatles songs for their classes to analyse. Your reaction and analysis deserves an A++
Keep Reacting!
Amy did a great job here with some of the technical nuances etc., but I find Howard Goodall's breakdown of Eleanor Rigby to be the most moving that you will ever hear: ruclips.net/video/ZQS91wVdvYc/видео.htmlsi=Z7Gx1wNH7BkNLmJB&t=1738
As soon as i saw you were doing this i was like I can't wait for your reaction to this. And i was correct. It took me a while to truly appreciate this song . But i knew there was something special about it.
This is the first time, as far as I can recall, that I have seen you get stuck on the first line of a song for 15 minutes. I realised as I listened to you explaining the 4 bars you had heard, that we hadn't gotten past the first line "Ah, look at all the lonely people" and I think this must have profoundly touched you in some way. Great work.
Love to see you just do a straight reaction and smiles.
At first I thought you were milking it ( 25 minutes )....but then I smiled, realized your love of strings and orchestration. Made me continue....
From west coast Canada 🇨🇦, peace.
( ps. Love to hear more, by ear harp playing to the songs reacted! ).
Truly great song. Really enjoyed your reaction. So interesting.
Rock has become a very big umbrella, covering many styles.
The misery of it is precisely why it is so beautiful and rewards multiple listens
I've been waiting for you to hear this one. To me this is an absolute masterpiece, both as a very expressive song about a very particular state of so many human beings (I grew up among such elderly, lonely people) and technically, every bit of the accompaniment (If we can call it simply an accompaniment) is what is should be.
And there's a lot of finesse, small, yummy contrapuntal moments that I enjoy so much!
It does make me sad indeed. But then so does Mahler - although in a very different sense.
But that's one of the jobs of all art isn't it?
Often it can and should turn our world upside down, make us sad or mad or question our own thoughts and beliefs. Rock music does that more often than not, that's part of why I love it.
Maybe the Czech writer Bohumil Hrabal was right when he said:
“No book worth its salt is meant to put you to sleep, it's meant to make you jump out of your bed in your underwear and run and beat the author's brains out.”
lol! 😀
I had a Czech visual artist friend who would probably have felt something of that sort about art in general. Those crazy Bohemians...
I'll admit I do have some books though, that I treasure specifically because of their soothing, drifting quality, to read after the laptop goes off before going to sleep. Puts the brainwaves and nervous system into a more spacious, less focused pattern. It doesn't have to be dumb, just another form of the writers' craft.
I really enjoyed your analysis of this piece. You have great insight and really bought this piece to life for me. The Beatles are simply the best and hopefully after your journey through their music you will agree with Vlad and me!
18:00 and we haven't gotten to the second verse. That's how you know you are dealing with greatness.