If all muslims interpreted Islam like Dr. Shabir Ally has here, there would be no Islamic terrorism. That said, I fear that we have a very very long road ahead.
Islam has nothing to do with terrorism and there is not such term as Islamic terrorism within the teachings of Islam itself, anyone from any religion can act as a terrorist, so why only one fait should be blamed all the time
@@sanjarbek7037 I too believe in not to perticularly label a religion or groupe of people for the terrorism but if you dig it from the beginning then all you would find that most of the attacks were carried out by people related to or followers of islam.
@@rishid100 where bro? America are the biggest terrorists in the world, they even done 9/11. I don’t believe that goat farmers from Afghanistan hijacked a plane and flew it into the world trade centre come on.
I understand what Dr Ally has to say, but refusing a hadith needs more than 9 minutes. Some of us are so dumb and blinded that they still would not understand what the main issue is. And this is why ummah is in this situation of mass chaos on the first place. If we spoke to each other with understanding, open mind, patience and staying within the context, ummah wouldn't be having troubles. If anyone bothered to read the description of this video it clearly says '' keeping the balanced approach to hadith that we don't contradict Quran'' but it's just about IQ. These people will refuse to listen to Dr Shabir because he is holding Quran first and then hadtih. These people are so dumb wallah!
So in hadith, Allah commanded the prophet to fignt the unbelievers until they become muslims..... That command must be somewhere in Quran.. But in Quran we find rather this command... "So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder. You are not over them a controller. However, he who turns away and disbelieves - Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment. [Quran 88:21-24]
Every knowledgeable muslim knows that surah 9 is about war times. 9:5 is about those who broke treaty and launched an armed rebel against the state, and is not about general circumstances, a fact which is evident once one reads 9:5 with 9:6. 9: 29 is not about forcing someone to change his religion, rather it is about the role of people of the book who live in muslim land, that they should acceptthe authority of muslim state, which must be manifested in the form of them paying taxes willingly to the Government. And if they dont pay tax, it would be taken as that they still have affiliation with the enemy empire (Byzantine Empire) and they will be fought as was the norm of the time. The most important thing is, both of those verses are about specific war time circumstances and should not be taken as general commandments.
@@Jspeclol a little reminder "Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes - from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly. Allah only forbids you from those who fight you because of religion and expel you from your homes and aid in your expulsion - [forbids] that you make allies of them. And whoever makes allies of them, then it is those who are the wrongdoers." Al Qur'an 60: 8-9
@@Jspeclol Mam ,Kindly read 9.4 and 9.6..in 9.4 the condition of Exception with whom NOT FIGHT Is mention PLEASE... 9.29 talks about JAZIYA but read there r many places muslims r instructed to pay ZAKAH....So,Jaziya is just Balancing Tax,paid by non muslims of Zakah ,paid by muslims ....please read Wikipedia page of Jaziya, where u will know there r many for whom Jaziya not need to pay..please wiki page of Jaziya... THANKS YOU MAM....
The Follower of Islam tend to stick with something unQuranic because they relied the Scholar and the Leader of Islam too much and follow anything by their Leader blindly without Questioning them. Why? Because the follower especially the villager thinks imam, sheikh, ulama, ustaz, etc as pious person that made not a mistakes. The Follower even gone too far as even said the religious person is not touched by sin.. And even worse some sincere believer fall to the abyss of idolatry because of heart that long for goodness but adoring the God's creation and even asking their leader to pray for them while they may pray themselves, God is All Hearing and far from Deaf. God's know what was hidden inside their chest. I myself once thinks Quran is not complete and need a Hadith to explain the detail while the Quran denied this fact since the Quran claim the Book itself is Perfect as a sole guidance and reasoning for those who use their thinking.. Just to name few unspeakable act from Muslim's religious scholar that made the Hadith as priority while Quran is number 2.. They even as far to say whoever disbelieve Hadith is Kafir while the Quran claims those who reject the Quran is Kafir which contradicts the religious leaders saying. Even worsening they even say the average person has no right to talks about religion which is contradicts the Quran that encourage every reader to use AQL (thinking, reasons). The reason mainly because the average person don't understand Arabic and may in the wrong path by relying on translation which once again contradicts their action by making the Hadith as priority and source inside of Islam. Another error they made is to reject any quotation Made by honest person that has learned the truth, and even go far to misinterpret the meaning of Quran by relying Hadith that has no place in Quran to be mentioned but Invention according to Quran. They even went above to say whoever sharing surah from the Quran is not on the right path but the Hadith follower is on the right path. Again, the only Hadith that Allah approved is the Quran itself, not another source as a sole guidance. On Jumaat Solat, the imam always warn the audience not to believe a person that follow the Quran, they said this is a new religion. It is shocking to heard this myself. Why the person who rely on Quran is guilty and at fault? Doesn't the Quran encourage every reader to think and learn and study the Quran and reason with the content inside of Quran? After that, wasn't the Quran said the reader may choose to believe or reject the Quran and at the same time offer a blissful reward for the believers while the rejector will be punished on fire? Strangely why almost all of our religious scholar teach the follower like that? Isn't not they claim themselves as a Muslim and even Did testify that they Believe in Quran and not the Hadith? If we are following One God, surely we just only need the Quran as a guidance. And you have the right to choose and decide which one is the True Path if you are being HONEST to Yourself!
Quintus Lentulus itsvtalking about the Byzantines about to attack Muhammad and his army gets a link for more information www.google.com/amp/s/discover-the-truth.com/2014/06/03/examining-quran-929-does-islam-sanction-the-killing-of-christians-and-jews/amp/
*v.22 : The noun hūr - rendered by me as “companions pure” - is a plural of both ahwar (masc.) and hawrā’ (fem.), either of which describes “a person distinguished by hawar,” which latter term primarily denotes “intense whiteness of the eyeballs and lustrous black of the iris” (Qāmūs). In a more general sense, hawar signifies simply “whiteness” (Asās) or, as a moral qualification, “purity” (cf. Tabarī, Rāzī, and Ibn Kathīr in their explanations of the term hawāriyyūn in **3:52**). Hence, the compound expression hūr ‘īn signifies, approximately, “pure beings [or, more specifically, “companions pure”], most beautiful of eye” (which latter is the meaning of ‘īn, the plural of a‘yan). In his comments on the identical expression in **52:20**, Rāzī observes that inasmuch as a person’s eye reflects his soul more clearly than any other part of the human body, ‘īn may be understood as “rich of soul” or “soulful.” Mohamed Asad*
Hadith is simply not part of Islam. This is so ridiculous, debating whether Chinese whispers are "sahih" or not. How's about you read the Quran itself and reflect and think for yourself. God himself told us it's complete and made easy to understand.
yas44 Hadith is the sayings of the Prophet peace be upon him. To say it's not a part of Islam is daring. Quran is the primary text of course, but Hadith does help in Quranic interpretation. People just need to be sincere and more open minded.
The Quran itself says it is the perfect Hadith, and nothing more is needed. Also, if you follow Hadith, why don't you follow the Hadith that says not to write down anything that the Prophet said or did, but only follow the Quran? The Hadith were selected and picked by men over the centuries, while the Quran is from God, I think I will stick with the Quran alone thank you.
@@matthewpettipas8233 lol there are more Quranist than I thought. I will stick with the Quran. The ahadiths are problematic and they are not a tool to interpret the Quran because by the time you Cypher through the Ahadiths in order to determine which ahadiths are authentic, you could have just read the Quran and asked Allah for guidance and understanding. The Quran is clear. The ahadiths have created a false and fabricated Islam- an attempt to add pre-islamic practices into Islam. No thank you.
In order to understand the life of Prophet Muhammad and some of the apparent 'violence' that took place during his prophetic mission, it is important to understand few crucial aspects about the narrative of the Quran. It is as if the Quran is doing commentary on the life of Prophet Muhammad. It is being highlighted in some recent works on Quran that with regards to its subject-matter, Quran is the narrative of a messenger's warning (indhar in Arabic) to his people. Seen in this light Quran would be the best biography of Prophet Muhammad. Obviously, it takes deep insight to see how this is the case. The crucial point to realize in this regard is the difference between a Prophet (nabi) and a Messenger (rasul). Messengers are special prophets who carry out a divine mission on Earth. Let us try to understand that mission and the history of all the Prophets and Messengers sent by God. We will then see the pattern emerging and would help us understand the wisdom behind God's plan with humanity. As the Quran claims the unity of God and unity of man, initially mankind had one religion: belief in one God and humanity to man. But then as history progressed, human beings deviated from this basic and simple religion (which we can call basic Islam) by adding to it alien doctrines and practices. In order to guide them back to the correct religion, God decided to send prophets and books to different nations. The prophets would remind them of their duty towards God (they didn't bring any new information with regards to this doctrine, it is already innate in all human beings) and responsibility towards his creation. They would also warn them of the day of judgment when God will judge based on our deeds. But even after hearing the rational evidence and seeing God's signs in his creation, people of the prophet's nation would deny him knowingly. In order to establish demonstrable proof of His message, God then decided to appoint certain of these prophets as messengers. According to Quran Noah (Nuh) would be the first such messenger on Earth. A messenger starts his mission as a prophet, calling people to rectify their deviation. They would give rational evidence and proof to his people in order for them to think and self-reflect. But then during this prophetic phase of the messenger's mission will come a time when God decides that no more evidence would be presented as those people will not mend their ways and his judgment would now take place on Earth. For this, the messenger and those who responded to his call are divinely instructed to separate from the rejecters. Noah's ark was this separation, it separated the believers from the disbelievers. God then sends the forces of nature to establish his judgment for the nation of the messenger on this very Earth, believers are saved/victorious and rejecters punished, just like what will take place in the day of judgment. The objective is to establish historical witness of the day of judgment, in Quranic terminology this is called 'shahadah' (witness). In short, we can summarize the difference between a prophet and a messenger, a messenger's call culminates to a witness. This is the reason we say 'I bear witness Muhammad is Allah's Messenger' and not merely Allah's prophet. This is what is referred to in the Quran as the 'sunnatAllah', the divine practice of God through his messengers. The story of Saalih, Lut (Lot), Musa (Moses), Ibraheem (Abraham), Isa (Jesus) all have this feature in common since all of them came as God's messengers. Space doesn't permit, but it would be instructive to see how God's judgment took place at various degrees for all of these personalities and their respective nations. Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was also a messenger and his 23 years of preaching mission was no different. As a messenger he established God's judgment on his people, the children of Ishmael (Arabs) and the people of the book of Arabia (Jews & Christian). The difference between his mission and that of Nuh is that since he was able to get substantial followers (through divine help), God used the 'hand of man' instead of the 'power of nature' to punish the rejecters. The military mission of Prophet Muhammad needs to be seen in this light primarily. Sometimes we get lost in the details of the story and don't see the big picture. After 10 years of various military and political campaign (again through divine instruction), the final judgment was announced after the conquest of Makkah in surah Taubah (chapter 9 of Quran). Those non-Muslims who quote the 'jihad' verses of surah Taubah fail to realize the background of its revelation, unfortunately many of the extremist groups would do the same and think that the verses are instructing us to wage war against today's non-Muslims. Another profound misunderstanding of the modern-day Islamists (like Jamat Islami, Ikhwan al-Muslimin, Hizbut Tahrir etc) is to see the prophetic mission of Prophet Muhammad as primarily a political and social revolution. The judgment that took place in 7th century Arabia through Prophet Muhammad has taken place in the known history of mankind, so too the judgment through Jesus and Moses. The three Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) are a historical reality and it is through them that God communicated his message to the other nation of the world in this historical period. The stories of the messengers sent to different nations of the globe before Abraham are all part of pre-history, mankind has not been able to preserve those incidents when God directly intervened in human history. It is altogether a different matter how the followers (not the immediate followers of the messengers - the first generation) of all the three branches of Abraham have deviated or fallen short of holding fast to the true teachings of God's religion. All the battles fought by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and his followers had two dimensions: firstly it was a means to eradicate oppression and persecution and secondly to establish a miniature Day of Judgment on this very earth by establishing God's judgment. The believers are given victory and authority over the land and the rejectors are given punishments according to their crimes: death penalty for the polytheists of Arabia and jizya for the people of the book. No doubt the latter dimension can only be specific to the age of the messenger, the former is the universal shariah applicable for Muslims for all time and place. The hadith 'whoever changes his religion kill him' has to be understood in this context. It is not an independent directive of shariah. As is often the case with hadith, the background and context is not always apparent, as the narrators sometime omit them. The hadith is talking about death punishment of the people of Arabia (the nation of the Prophet) at that time. Whoever rejects faith after accepting Islam, must face God’s judgment as the truth has been conclusively communicated to the nation of the messenger. The hadith "I have been commanded to fight the people (the people of Arabia at the time of the Prophet) until they testify 'la ilaha illallah.' "also needs to be understood in this context. It is a divine law regarding the messengers. The incident of banu-quraidha, the war of apostasy waged by Abu Bakr during his caliphate and the execution of certain disbelievers outside of the battlefield also make sense once we see them in this light. The military campaigns of the companions of Prophet Muhammad after his demise towards the empires surrounding Arabia were also an extension of this divine judgment. It might seem strange at first to see their military campaign in this light, but once we start to appreciate this perspective we will gradually realize God's wisdom on how he has interacted in human history. How he has tried to lit up the light of his universal guidance time and again, if only people would take heed. Our respected scholars have incorrectly tried to derive rulings of shariah from all of these incidents and narrations, whereas they are specific for the age of the messenger and his people. These conclusions are based on a critical analysis and appreciation of the language and coherence of the Qur'anic discourse, without any need to read 'liberalism' between its lines. An extensive amount of foundational work has been done on Qur'anic hermeneutics by the scholars of the Farahi school (Indo-Pak) in this regard for the last 100 years. Please refer to the following, 1. Javed Ahmad Ghamidi, 'Islam: A Comprehensive Introduction' chapter 5. 2. Dr. Shehzaad Saleem, 'Playing God: Misreading a Divine Practice'. 3. Dr. Shehzaad Saleem, ‘Understanding the Qur’ān: A Fundamental Premise’.
the basics of Islamic teaching is surah ikhlas In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful. 1. Say, “He is God, the One. 2. God, the Absolute. 3. He begets not, nor was He begotten. 4. And there is nothing comparable to Him.” i hope you are aware of this surah. god is something that is beyond the imagination of mankind anything every muslim is of course aware of it but when muslim and bukhari wrote this in their books i dont know when but these books came in mainstream Islam during 70's and 80's while cia was recruiting for mujahideen for soviet union this hadith sunnah.com/muslim/53/32 خَلَقَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ آدَمَ عَلَى صُورَتِهِ طُولُهُ سِتُّونَ ذِرَاعًا فَلَمَّا خَلَقَهُ قَالَ اذْهَبْ فَسَلِّمْ عَلَى أُولَئِكَ النَّفَرِ وَهُمْ نَفَرٌ مِنَ الْمَلاَئِكَةِ جُلُوسٌ فَاسْتَمِعْ مَا يُجِيبُونَكَ فَإِنَّهَا تَحِيَّتُكَ وَتَحِيَّةُ ذُرِّيَّتِكَ قَالَ فَذَهَبَ فَقَالَ السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ فَقَالُوا السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكَ وَرَحْمَةُ اللَّهِ - قَالَ - فَزَادُوهُ وَرَحْمَةُ اللَّهِ - قَالَ - فَكُلُّ مَنْ يَدْخُلُ الْجَنَّةَ عَلَى صُورَةِ آدَمَ وَطُولُهُ سِتُّونَ ذِرَاعًا فَلَمْ يَزَلِ الْخَلْقُ يَنْقُصُ بَعْدَهُ حَتَّى الآنَ " Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, created Adam in His image with His length of sixty cubits, and as He created him He told him to greet that group, and that was a party of angels sitting there, and listen to the response that they give him, for it would form his greeting and that of his offspring. He then went away and said: Peace be upon you! They (the angels) said: May there be peace upon you and the Mercy of Allah, and they made an addition of" Mercy of Allah". So he who would get into Paradise would get in the form of Adam, his length being sixty cubits, then the people who followed him continued to diminish in size up to this day. he was not aware of basic tenets of Islam so I would not trade my eternity for what he has said there is a problem with every hadith written in Bukhari and other books if you look them with critical eyes slandering the character of Prophet and his wife Hazrat Aisha allah says in quran he will protect this book from abrogation for a reason and I personally believe that Salafis worship satin not Allah there is a thin difference allah is rahman and raheem satan is evil and cursed both are wahad one
nicolas if you ever had read Quran you won't ask this question. only and only allah can give Hidayat even prophet Mohammad couldn't bring people to islam unless Allah will make them to believe in
there are multiple hadith on this subject in bukhari and muslims in his own image . when a christain say god created adam in his own image thats a shrik but when a wahabi says its its pure tawheed pure hypocrisy here is full description of this according to salafi website Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: “The word soorah (image) in this hadeeth is like all the other names and attributes narrated (in the texts) where the words used may also be applied to created beings, in a limited manner. When these words are applied to Allaah, they carry a unique meaning, such as al-‘Aleem (All Knowing), al-Qadeer (All-Powerful), al-Raheem (Most Merciful), al-Samee’ (All Hearing), al-Baseer (All-Seeing), and such as His creating with His hands, rising above the Throne, etc.” Naqd al-Ta’sees, 3/396 islamqa.info/en/20652 www.clearquran.com/009.html 9:107. Then there are those who establish a mosque to cause harm, and disbelief, and disunity among the believers, and as an outpost for those who fight God and His Messenger. They will swear: “Our intentions are nothing but good.” But God bears witness that they are liars. 6:19. Say, “What thing is more solemn in testimony?” Say, “God is Witness between you and me. This Quran was revealed to me, that I may warn you with it, and whomever it may reach. Do you indeed testify that there are other gods with God?” Say, “I myself do not testify.” Say, “He is but One God, and I am innocent of your idolatry.” i know these words of quran have no effect on you becuase you are here just troll and boost you ego
the point is 99% of hadith is just assumptions made by people during writing these book and falsely attributing them to the prophet and quran does mention that but muslims seem to be clueless and think they are really from messenger of god . quran is clear in its message but present day mullahs have made useless issues to divide people like how to dress, music, shrines etc etc there is important task people of knowledge like shabir ally should rescue the real message islam from this madness .
Agree with shabbir alley not calling to throw away everything in Hadith but keep what is relevant to Muslims today and do away with the things that contradicts the Quran, but salafis want to take every Chinese whispers to be true which leads to oppression
where did "Amr bil Maroof wa Nahi 'anil Munkar" comes from and what was the original intent for it. Does it mean suggestion or force? is it the verse in Quran?
I m a Muslim from Malaysia..i have studied Torah Bible and Quran for more than 2 decades includes the so called hadith sahih...Tafseer by Jalalyen..Al Tabari..Al Qhutubi..Ibn Kathir and many more..also compared to mesopotamia and gilgamesh epic..it is a clear cut proof that all religions were man made..MYTH
Peace Be Upon You. The Quran stated that you should rejected Hadiths and ONLY believe in the Quran. But million of Muslims believe in these fabricated Hadiths books of deception. Hear are few verse from Quran rejecting Hadiths. These are the verses(Quran) of Allah which We recite to you in truth. Then in what statement(Hadith) after Allah and His verses(Quran) will they believe 45:6 Then in what statement(Hadith) after the Qur'an will they believe? 77:50 [Say], "Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book explained in detail?" And those to whom We [previously] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters. 6:114 May Allah keep us believer on the guide path. Peace and blessing be upon you. Abdullah
I have come to the same conclusion as you. and I am confused as to why other people aren't seeing it. I see more Muslims adhering to the ahadiths rather than the Quran. And I think it has created mass confusion within the Ummah
@@Oshianis Peace be upon.😊 Thanks someone is finally listening. The reason why you are so confused about why other people aren't seeing it. Two word '' Brain wash. '' These scholar, sheik and Iman put these Hadiths into their lectures every time. So, if I keep repeat the same verses over and over soon or later you will start to believe. Yes, and you will continue to see it. The teachers of Islam always telling their audience or students '' Order for you can understand the Quran you have to understand the Hadiths. The Quran ( Sunnah of Allah) is all you need. This is what the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) follow, not his own sunnah. That mean he would be disobey Allah(swt) commandment and mislead the Ummah if he following his own sunnah (Hadiths). You're right ! It have create a mass confusion and this what Satan once. [Say], "Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book [i.e., the Qur’ān] explained in detail?" And those to whom We [previously] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters. 6 - 114 Q And the word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can alter His words, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing. 6-115 Q If you what true teaching all you need is the Quran and pray and ask for guidance. Peace be upon you. 😊 Quran only Muslim
@@Oshianis Yes , I performing the prescribed salat that the Quran command us to do which is 3 time a day. 1 -Al-Fajr (Dawn Prayer) 24:58Q 2- Al-Salat Al-Wusta (The Middle Prayer) 2:238 Q 3- Salat Al-Isha (Night Prayer) 24:58 Q
Shabir is falling short of saying Islam does not apply to non arabs Surah Fussilat (Quran. 41.44) Had We revealed it as a non-Arabic Quran, THEY would have certainly argued, "If only its verses were made clear 'in our language'. What! A non - Arabic revelation for an Arab audience!" Say, 'O Prophet,' "It is a guide and a healing to the believers. As for those who DISBELIEVE, there is deafness in their ears and blindness to it 'in their hearts'. It is as if they are being called from a faraway place."
It is not presumed context Shabir when the prophet said he was sent to fight the people the people referred to the Arab polytheists this is not even a question debated amongst scholars it is seriously concerning that you don’t know this- many other Hadiths and the seerah show that indeed the prophet had to fight until the Arab polytheists either converted or they were forced to leave Arabia!!! Abu bakr himself fought them when they refused to pay the zakat.
Dr. Shabbir, is it true that Hoor Al Ayun, mentioned in the Quran, have been described as light-skinned women? Is this the case or has the mean been lost in the translation? please do reply.
He won't reply but I will. *v.22 : The noun hūr - rendered by me as “companions pure” - is a plural of both ahwar (masc.) and hawrā’ (fem.), either of which describes “a person distinguished by hawar,” which latter term primarily denotes “intense whiteness of the eyeballs and lustrous black of the iris” (Qāmūs). In a more general sense, hawar signifies simply “whiteness” (Asās) or, as a moral qualification, “purity” (cf. Tabarī, Rāzī, and Ibn Kathīr in their explanations of the term hawāriyyūn in **3:52**). Hence, the compound expression hūr ‘īn signifies, approximately, “pure beings [or, more specifically, “companions pure”], most beautiful of eye” (which latter is the meaning of ‘īn, the plural of a‘yan). In his comments on the identical expression in **52:20**, Rāzī observes that inasmuch as a person’s eye reflects his soul more clearly than any other part of the human body, ‘īn may be understood as “rich of soul” or “soulful.” Mohamed Asad*
At-Taubah 9:29 قَٰتِلُوا۟ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَلَا بِٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْءَاخِرِ وَلَا يُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ ٱللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُۥ وَلَا يَدِينُونَ دِينَ ٱلْحَقِّ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُوا۟ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ حَتَّىٰ يُعْطُوا۟ ٱلْجِزْيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَٰغِرُونَ Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. This verse should also be problematic according to understanding of Shabir Aly. He is a hadith rejector for sure. He rejects Ahadith based on his own logic but when it comes to Quran He dares to do that so he says but this mean is not this, read the context etc. He is misleading many Muslims. He should fear Allah
Ibn Wabb radiyallahu anh one of the students of Imam Malik radiyallahu anh Saïd: i met Imam Malik because the science of hadith could be my dalal way. For that it s Haram tout use the hadith if WE aren t mujtahid. In the hadith de have got the sanad and the matn. There is not ijma on the classification of narrators of ahadiths...
Just coz something seems problematic you can't just throw it away especially if it has been deemed to authentic unless you can prove otherwise. If there's violence in authentic narrations, it is there...no point to sugarcoat Islam...
At the end of all the discourse and interpretations and arguments...Islam is simply a blasphemy and a curse upon mankind! Jesus Christ is returning to defend Israel and destroy the Antichrist, MUSLIM Armies and to destroy the Beast..In the end, God wins!
Yuuuuuuup, Yeshua is dead and gone, sorry to break it to you. Do you even understand Christian history? How orthodox Christianity came to be? The original followers of Yeshua never considered him divine or even the Messiah, but simply a Prophet sent by God. So please spare me the nonsense of him returning, it's been two thousand years, he ain't coming back.
I so regularly hear that the Quran is perfect...flawless text from the prophet as dictated by the angel Gabriel(not God btw)... And all I hear from this gentleman is the claim that sections of the Quran are wrong... I believe that if Islam was the last revelation of God to man then such discrepancies wouldn't exist. Read the New Testament, there's no violence, no executions, no polygamy... Just sincere peace... that book was wrote 700 years before Mohamnad aswell.... there are certain things Muslims really need to consider.
The same could be said about Christians, there is much they need to consider! The Old Testament is an integral part of the Christian faith and there is so much more violence then you will find in the Quran! In any case during the crusades some of the most horrible violence was committed against the Muslims and Jews, and justified on the basis of the Christian faith (the New and the Old Testament). More recently, in the last century, two of the bloodiest wars in history were initiated and fought in large part by people who considered themselves to be Christians! Hardly a resounding endorsement of Christianity as a religion of "sincere peace!"
He is talking about hadith never ever he said any word of quran is wrong!!! Quran is full of peace also, and there is nothing bad on it alhamdulillah, i m a convert from cristianity myself and i convert only by reading many imes the quran and not finding any mistake! And the new testament is also beautiful, but most of the Christians don't follow anything of it, specially that Jesus never said he is God 🙏
EmeraldDiamond3 He did not throw away the sunna dear brother. He is being very specific. Some hadith go directly against the Holy Quran. It doesn't matter if the hadith is authentic or not. Hadith is man's work. The Quran is God's word. Which one should you choose?
Salar Abbas Salar Abbas You do realize the Quran is also from muttawatir Hadith. Unless you think the Prophet (saw) hand wrote it and copied it for everyone. Which he didn't. Shabir ally has done the same thing with other authentic ahadith. Which is a huge favor to Islam haters as they can now question just about anything they want. Not to mention Uthman (ra) did burn some Qurans from other cultures to insure only the original text was being distributed. A fact even shabir ally agrees with. Well with that said who's to say Uthman(ra) didn't rewrite some himself ? We would never know unless you trust in the reports of thousands of companions of the prophet. Which we do. Shabir throws that away when he rejects authentic Sunnah. Essentially calling into question every Hadith. And the Quran itself.
EmeraldDiamond3 Dear brother. It is true that the Holy Quran also was passed on threw the same tradition. But there is no muttwatir hadith like the Quran. Name me 1 hadith that is the same muttwatir level as the Quran. There is none. And we muslims see the Quran as the infallible Word of God. Other hadith is man's work. The point is very simple. There are hadiths which clearly contradicts the Quran. What will you choose as most authentic?
The Quran says nothing about the Sunnah, the Prophet's only job was to recite it, nothing more, nothing left. The way of the Prophet was the Quran, the Hadith are man made.
You do realise if you don't throw away this hadith then you are throwing away rest of many hadiths which says do not kill people who have different belief than you? I hope you are okay with ditching all those hadiths because you want to hold on to this one? Why don't you take a flexible approach and understand the context rather than have an extreme approach!!!
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
If all muslims interpreted Islam like Dr. Shabir Ally has here, there would be no Islamic terrorism. That said, I fear that we have a very very long road ahead.
Stop Kafirophobia The problem is not "interpretations" but ignorance. It is not hard to read the Quran in its whole beside the tafsir.
Islam has nothing to do with terrorism and there is not such term as Islamic terrorism within the teachings of Islam itself, anyone from any religion can act as a terrorist, so why only one fait should be blamed all the time
@@sanjarbek7037 I too believe in not to perticularly label a religion or groupe of people for the terrorism but if you dig it from the beginning then all you would find that most of the attacks were carried out by people related to or followers of islam.
@@rishid100 where bro? America are the biggest terrorists in the world, they even done 9/11. I don’t believe that goat farmers from Afghanistan hijacked a plane and flew it into the world trade centre come on.
Quran is main book of islam. if any hadith against quran then we should not follow the hadith
I understand what Dr Ally has to say, but refusing a hadith needs more than 9 minutes. Some of us are so dumb and blinded that they still would not understand what the main issue is.
And this is why ummah is in this situation of mass chaos on the first place. If we spoke to each other with understanding, open mind, patience and staying within the context, ummah wouldn't be having troubles.
If anyone bothered to read the description of this video it clearly says '' keeping the balanced approach to hadith that we don't contradict Quran'' but it's just about IQ. These people will refuse to listen to Dr Shabir because he is holding Quran first and then hadtih. These people are so dumb wallah!
Exactly,
If any hadith against quran then the hadith is fake
So in hadith, Allah commanded the prophet to fignt the unbelievers until they become muslims..... That command must be somewhere in Quran.. But in Quran we find rather this command... "So remind, [O Muhammad]; you are only a reminder. You are not over them a controller. However, he who turns away and disbelieves - Then Allah will punish him with the greatest punishment. [Quran 88:21-24]
Try 9:5 and 9:29
Every knowledgeable muslim knows that surah 9 is about war times. 9:5 is about those who broke treaty and launched an armed rebel against the state, and is not about general circumstances, a fact which is evident once one reads 9:5 with 9:6. 9: 29 is not about forcing someone to change his religion, rather it is about the role of people of the book who live in muslim land, that they should acceptthe authority of muslim state, which must be manifested in the form of them paying taxes willingly to the Government. And if they dont pay tax, it would be taken as that they still have affiliation with the enemy empire (Byzantine Empire) and they will be fought as was the norm of the time.
The most important thing is, both of those verses are about specific war time circumstances and should not be taken as general commandments.
+nina verbod you really have no idea about either Islam or Quran just an ignorant fool.
@@Jspeclol a little reminder
"Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes - from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly. Allah only forbids you from those who fight you because of religion and expel you from your homes and aid in your expulsion - [forbids] that you make allies of them. And whoever makes allies of them, then it is those who are the wrongdoers."
Al Qur'an 60: 8-9
@@Jspeclol Mam ,Kindly read 9.4 and 9.6..in 9.4 the condition of Exception with whom NOT FIGHT Is mention PLEASE...
9.29 talks about JAZIYA but read there r many places muslims r instructed to pay ZAKAH....So,Jaziya is just Balancing Tax,paid by non muslims of Zakah ,paid by muslims ....please read Wikipedia page of Jaziya, where u will know there r many for whom Jaziya not need to pay..please wiki page of Jaziya...
THANKS YOU MAM....
What concerns me is that the lack of views on this channel 😢 shows how many Muslims blindly follow
The Follower of Islam tend to stick with something unQuranic because they relied the Scholar and the Leader of Islam too much and follow anything by their Leader blindly without Questioning them. Why? Because the follower especially the villager thinks imam, sheikh, ulama, ustaz, etc as pious person that made not a mistakes. The Follower even gone too far as even said the religious person is not touched by sin.. And even worse some sincere believer fall to the abyss of idolatry because of heart that long for goodness but adoring the God's creation and even asking their leader to pray for them while they may pray themselves, God is All Hearing and far from Deaf. God's know what was hidden inside their chest.
I myself once thinks Quran is not complete and need a Hadith to explain the detail while the Quran denied this fact since the Quran claim the Book itself is Perfect as a sole guidance and reasoning for those who use their thinking..
Just to name few unspeakable act from Muslim's religious scholar that made the Hadith as priority while Quran is number 2.. They even as far to say whoever disbelieve Hadith is Kafir while the Quran claims those who reject the Quran is Kafir which contradicts the religious leaders saying.
Even worsening they even say the average person has no right to talks about religion which is contradicts the Quran that encourage every reader to use AQL (thinking, reasons). The reason mainly because the average person don't understand Arabic and may in the wrong path by relying on translation which once again contradicts their action by making the Hadith as priority and source inside of Islam.
Another error they made is to reject any quotation Made by honest person that has learned the truth, and even go far to misinterpret the meaning of Quran by relying Hadith that has no place in Quran to be mentioned but Invention according to Quran. They even went above to say whoever sharing surah from the Quran is not on the right path but the Hadith follower is on the right path. Again, the only Hadith that Allah approved is the Quran itself, not another source as a sole guidance.
On Jumaat Solat, the imam always warn the audience not to believe a person that follow the Quran, they said this is a new religion. It is shocking to heard this myself. Why the person who rely on Quran is guilty and at fault? Doesn't the Quran encourage every reader to think and learn and study the Quran and reason with the content inside of Quran? After that, wasn't the Quran said the reader may choose to believe or reject the Quran and at the same time offer a blissful reward for the believers while the rejector will be punished on fire?
Strangely why almost all of our religious scholar teach the follower like that?
Isn't not they claim themselves as a Muslim and even Did testify that they Believe in Quran and not the Hadith?
If we are following One God, surely we just only need the Quran as a guidance.
And you have the right to choose and decide which one is the True Path if you are being HONEST to Yourself!
I am glad I am not alone in this approach
Excellent program
What does Allah mean when he says "Fight those who do not believe in Allah" in Surah 9:29?
Quintus Lentulus itsvtalking about the Byzantines about to attack Muhammad and his army gets a link for more information www.google.com/amp/s/discover-the-truth.com/2014/06/03/examining-quran-929-does-islam-sanction-the-killing-of-christians-and-jews/amp/
Its only wat time of prophet(s). non muslim misunderstood quran
I see it as Islam not being a religion , rather a political movement disguised as such. To conquer other lands under a banner of Islam.
Read the reason Chapter 9 was revealed!
Asslmukm, Please have a discussion on the hadith about cursing. JazkAllah
Throw that Hadith out the window, it contradicts Quran.
What was the name of the non-muslim scholar please (7:45 ) ? I didn't quite catch it. Lloyd _______? Thankyou
*v.22 : The noun hūr - rendered by me as “companions pure” - is a plural of both ahwar (masc.) and hawrā’ (fem.), either of which describes “a person distinguished by hawar,” which latter term primarily denotes “intense whiteness of the eyeballs and lustrous black of the iris” (Qāmūs). In a more general sense, hawar signifies simply “whiteness” (Asās) or, as a moral qualification, “purity” (cf. Tabarī, Rāzī, and Ibn Kathīr in their explanations of the term hawāriyyūn in **3:52**). Hence, the compound expression hūr ‘īn signifies, approximately, “pure beings [or, more specifically, “companions pure”], most beautiful of eye” (which latter is the meaning of ‘īn, the plural of a‘yan). In his comments on the identical expression in **52:20**, Rāzī observes that inasmuch as a person’s eye reflects his soul more clearly than any other part of the human body, ‘īn may be understood as “rich of soul” or “soulful.” Mohamed Asad*
Hadith is simply not part of Islam. This is so ridiculous, debating whether Chinese whispers are "sahih" or not. How's about you read the Quran itself and reflect and think for yourself. God himself told us it's complete and made easy to understand.
yas44
Hadith is the sayings of the Prophet peace be upon him. To say it's not a part of Islam is daring.
Quran is the primary text of course, but Hadith does help in Quranic interpretation.
People just need to be sincere and more open minded.
Thank goodness someone else who is a Quranist haha. I agree with you one hundred percent!
The Quran itself says it is the perfect Hadith, and nothing more is needed. Also, if you follow Hadith, why don't you follow the Hadith that says not to write down anything that the Prophet said or did, but only follow the Quran? The Hadith were selected and picked by men over the centuries, while the Quran is from God, I think I will stick with the Quran alone thank you.
@@matthewpettipas8233 lol there are more Quranist than I thought. I will stick with the Quran. The ahadiths are problematic and they are not a tool to interpret the Quran because by the time you Cypher through the Ahadiths in order to determine which ahadiths are authentic, you could have just read the Quran and asked Allah for guidance and understanding. The Quran is clear.
The ahadiths have created a false and fabricated Islam- an attempt to add pre-islamic practices into Islam. No thank you.
In order to understand the life of Prophet Muhammad and some of the apparent 'violence' that took place during his prophetic mission, it is important to understand few crucial aspects about the narrative of the Quran. It is as if the Quran is doing commentary on the life of Prophet Muhammad. It is being highlighted in some recent works on Quran that with regards to its subject-matter, Quran is the narrative of a messenger's warning (indhar in Arabic) to his people. Seen in this light Quran would be the best biography of Prophet Muhammad. Obviously, it takes deep insight to see how this is the case.
The crucial point to realize in this regard is the difference between a Prophet (nabi) and a Messenger (rasul). Messengers are special prophets who carry out a divine mission on Earth. Let us try to understand that mission and the history of all the Prophets and Messengers sent by God. We will then see the pattern emerging and would help us understand the wisdom behind God's plan with humanity. As the Quran claims the unity of God and unity of man, initially mankind had one religion: belief in one God and humanity to man. But then as history progressed, human beings deviated from this basic and simple religion (which we can call basic Islam) by adding to it alien doctrines and practices. In order to guide them back to the correct religion, God decided to send prophets and books to different nations. The prophets would remind them of their duty towards God (they didn't bring any new information with regards to this doctrine, it is already innate in all human beings) and responsibility towards his creation. They would also warn them of the day of judgment when God will judge based on our deeds. But even after hearing the rational evidence and seeing God's signs in his creation, people of the prophet's nation would deny him knowingly. In order to establish demonstrable proof of His message, God then decided to appoint certain of these prophets as messengers. According to Quran Noah (Nuh) would be the first such messenger on Earth. A messenger starts his mission as a prophet, calling people to rectify their deviation. They would give rational evidence and proof to his people in order for them to think and self-reflect. But then during this prophetic phase of the messenger's mission will come a time when God decides that no more evidence would be presented as those people will not mend their ways and his judgment would now take place on Earth. For this, the messenger and those who responded to his call are divinely instructed to separate from the rejecters. Noah's ark was this separation, it separated the believers from the disbelievers. God then sends the forces of nature to establish his judgment for the nation of the messenger on this very Earth, believers are saved/victorious and rejecters punished, just like what will take place in the day of judgment. The objective is to establish historical witness of the day of judgment, in Quranic terminology this is called 'shahadah' (witness). In short, we can summarize the difference between a prophet and a messenger, a messenger's call culminates to a witness. This is the reason we say 'I bear witness Muhammad is Allah's Messenger' and not merely Allah's prophet. This is what is referred to in the Quran as the 'sunnatAllah', the divine practice of God through his messengers. The story of Saalih, Lut (Lot), Musa (Moses), Ibraheem (Abraham), Isa (Jesus) all have this feature in common since all of them came as God's messengers. Space doesn't permit, but it would be instructive to see how God's judgment took place at various degrees for all of these personalities and their respective nations.
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was also a messenger and his 23 years of preaching mission was no different. As a messenger he established God's judgment on his people, the children of Ishmael (Arabs) and the people of the book of Arabia (Jews & Christian). The difference between his mission and that of Nuh is that since he was able to get substantial followers (through divine help), God used the 'hand of man' instead of the 'power of nature' to punish the rejecters. The military mission of Prophet Muhammad needs to be seen in this light primarily. Sometimes we get lost in the details of the story and don't see the big picture. After 10 years of various military and political campaign (again through divine instruction), the final judgment was announced after the conquest of Makkah in surah Taubah (chapter 9 of Quran). Those non-Muslims who quote the 'jihad' verses of surah Taubah fail to realize the background of its revelation, unfortunately many of the extremist groups would do the same and think that the verses are instructing us to wage war against today's non-Muslims. Another profound misunderstanding of the modern-day Islamists (like Jamat Islami, Ikhwan al-Muslimin, Hizbut Tahrir etc) is to see the prophetic mission of Prophet Muhammad as primarily a political and social revolution.
The judgment that took place in 7th century Arabia through Prophet Muhammad has taken place in the known history of mankind, so too the judgment through Jesus and Moses. The three Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) are a historical reality and it is through them that God communicated his message to the other nation of the world in this historical period. The stories of the messengers sent to different nations of the globe before Abraham are all part of pre-history, mankind has not been able to preserve those incidents when God directly intervened in human history. It is altogether a different matter how the followers (not the immediate followers of the messengers - the first generation) of all the three branches of Abraham have deviated or fallen short of holding fast to the true teachings of God's religion.
All the battles fought by Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and his followers had two dimensions: firstly it was a means to eradicate oppression and persecution and secondly to establish a miniature Day of Judgment on this very earth by establishing God's judgment. The believers are given victory and authority over the land and the rejectors are given punishments according to their crimes: death penalty for the polytheists of Arabia and jizya for the people of the book. No doubt the latter dimension can only be specific to the age of the messenger, the former is the universal shariah applicable for Muslims for all time and place. The hadith 'whoever changes his religion kill him' has to be understood in this context. It is not an independent directive of shariah. As is often the case with hadith, the background and context is not always apparent, as the narrators sometime omit them. The hadith is talking about death punishment of the people of Arabia (the nation of the Prophet) at that time. Whoever rejects faith after accepting Islam, must face God’s judgment as the truth has been conclusively communicated to the nation of the messenger. The hadith "I have been commanded to fight the people (the people of Arabia at the time of the Prophet) until they testify 'la ilaha illallah.' "also needs to be understood in this context. It is a divine law regarding the messengers. The incident of banu-quraidha, the war of apostasy waged by Abu Bakr during his caliphate and the execution of certain disbelievers outside of the battlefield also make sense once we see them in this light. The military campaigns of the companions of Prophet Muhammad after his demise towards the empires surrounding Arabia were also an extension of this divine judgment. It might seem strange at first to see their military campaign in this light, but once we start to appreciate this perspective we will gradually realize God's wisdom on how he has interacted in human history. How he has tried to lit up the light of his universal guidance time and again, if only people would take heed. Our respected scholars have incorrectly tried to derive rulings of shariah from all of these incidents and narrations, whereas they are specific for the age of the messenger and his people. These conclusions are based on a critical analysis and appreciation of the language and coherence of the Qur'anic discourse, without any need to read 'liberalism' between its lines. An extensive amount of foundational work has been done on Qur'anic hermeneutics by the scholars of the Farahi school (Indo-Pak) in this regard for the last 100 years. Please refer to the following,
1. Javed Ahmad Ghamidi, 'Islam: A Comprehensive Introduction' chapter 5.
2. Dr. Shehzaad Saleem, 'Playing God: Misreading a Divine Practice'.
3. Dr. Shehzaad Saleem, ‘Understanding the Qur’ān: A Fundamental Premise’.
what bukahri muslim and others did to Islam is same what paul did to Christianity
MR FOGGY bukhari and Muslim are the most authentic books after the Quran. You find them problematic? That's your problem.
the basics of Islamic teaching is surah ikhlas
In the name of God, the Gracious, the Merciful.
1. Say, “He is God, the One.
2. God, the Absolute.
3. He begets not, nor was He begotten.
4. And there is nothing comparable to Him.”
i hope you are aware of this surah. god is something that is beyond the imagination of mankind anything every muslim is of course aware of it but when muslim and bukhari wrote this in their books i dont know when but these books came in mainstream Islam during 70's and 80's while cia was recruiting for mujahideen for soviet union
this hadith
sunnah.com/muslim/53/32
خَلَقَ اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ آدَمَ عَلَى صُورَتِهِ طُولُهُ سِتُّونَ ذِرَاعًا فَلَمَّا خَلَقَهُ قَالَ اذْهَبْ فَسَلِّمْ عَلَى أُولَئِكَ النَّفَرِ وَهُمْ نَفَرٌ مِنَ الْمَلاَئِكَةِ جُلُوسٌ فَاسْتَمِعْ مَا يُجِيبُونَكَ فَإِنَّهَا تَحِيَّتُكَ وَتَحِيَّةُ ذُرِّيَّتِكَ قَالَ فَذَهَبَ فَقَالَ السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكُمْ فَقَالُوا السَّلاَمُ عَلَيْكَ وَرَحْمَةُ اللَّهِ - قَالَ - فَزَادُوهُ وَرَحْمَةُ اللَّهِ - قَالَ - فَكُلُّ مَنْ يَدْخُلُ الْجَنَّةَ عَلَى صُورَةِ آدَمَ وَطُولُهُ سِتُّونَ ذِرَاعًا فَلَمْ يَزَلِ الْخَلْقُ يَنْقُصُ بَعْدَهُ حَتَّى الآنَ "
Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, created Adam in His image with His length of sixty cubits, and as He created him He told him to greet that group, and that was a party of angels sitting there, and listen to the response that they give him, for it would form his greeting and that of his offspring. He then went away and said: Peace be upon you! They (the angels) said: May there be peace upon you and the Mercy of Allah, and they made an addition of" Mercy of Allah". So he who would get into Paradise would get in the form of Adam, his length being sixty cubits, then the people who followed him continued to diminish in size up to this day.
he was not aware of basic tenets of Islam so I would not trade my eternity for what he has said
there is a problem with every hadith written in Bukhari and other books if you look them with critical eyes
slandering the character of Prophet and his wife Hazrat Aisha
allah says in quran he will protect this book from abrogation for a reason
and I personally believe that Salafis worship satin not Allah there is a thin difference allah is rahman and raheem satan is evil and cursed both are wahad one
nicolas if you ever had read Quran you won't ask this question. only and only allah can give Hidayat even prophet Mohammad couldn't bring people to islam unless Allah will make them to believe in
there are multiple hadith on this subject in bukhari and muslims in his own image . when a christain say god created adam in his own image thats a shrik but when a wahabi says its its pure tawheed pure hypocrisy
here is full description of this according to salafi website
Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah said: “The word soorah (image) in this hadeeth is like all the other names and attributes narrated (in the texts) where the words used may also be applied to created beings, in a limited manner. When these words are applied to Allaah, they carry a unique meaning, such as al-‘Aleem (All Knowing), al-Qadeer (All-Powerful), al-Raheem (Most Merciful), al-Samee’ (All Hearing), al-Baseer (All-Seeing), and such as His creating with His hands, rising above the Throne, etc.” Naqd al-Ta’sees, 3/396
islamqa.info/en/20652
www.clearquran.com/009.html
9:107. Then there are those who establish a mosque to cause harm, and disbelief, and disunity among the believers, and as an outpost for those who fight God and His Messenger. They will swear: “Our intentions are nothing but good.” But God bears witness that they are liars.
6:19. Say, “What thing is more solemn in testimony?” Say, “God is Witness between you and me. This Quran was revealed to me, that I may warn you with it, and whomever it may reach. Do you indeed testify that there are other gods with God?” Say, “I myself do not testify.” Say, “He is but One God, and I am innocent of your idolatry.”
i know these words of quran have no effect on you becuase you are here just troll and boost you ego
the point is 99% of hadith is just assumptions made by people during writing these book and falsely attributing them to the prophet and quran does mention that but muslims seem to be clueless and think they are really from messenger of god . quran is clear in its message but present day mullahs have made useless issues to divide people like how to dress, music, shrines etc etc
there is important task people of knowledge like shabir ally should rescue the real message islam from this madness .
Agree with shabbir alley not calling to throw away everything in Hadith but keep what is relevant to Muslims today and do away with the things that contradicts the Quran, but salafis want to take every Chinese whispers to be true which leads to oppression
where did "Amr bil Maroof wa Nahi 'anil Munkar" comes from and what was the original intent for it. Does it mean suggestion or force? is it the verse in Quran?
it is in the quran, mentioned 8 times
tell me where please?
What is merit emman after.....!
Hey how would you approach your parents about wanting to become muslim?
i told my mom first to know her reaction, she wasnt happy ! I havent told my father till date !
Just be upfront and honest with them. Tell them you believe Islam is the best path for you. I am sure they will understand in time.
i did i am homeless now.
Ravi verma you didn't you just want him not to become muslim shame on you
With your Imaan and Aamal, give them dawah with your character,but don't just directly tell them right in the beginning,ask them for their opinions
I m a Muslim from Malaysia..i have studied Torah Bible and Quran for more than 2 decades includes the so called hadith sahih...Tafseer by Jalalyen..Al Tabari..Al Qhutubi..Ibn Kathir and many more..also compared to mesopotamia and gilgamesh epic..it is a clear cut proof that all religions were man made..MYTH
How are you still a muslim
@@iceseic I guess he meant that all other religions are man made.
Confusion!
Quran is main book of islam. if any hadith against quran then we should not follow the hadith
....
Peace Be Upon You. The Quran stated that you should rejected Hadiths and ONLY believe in the Quran. But million of Muslims believe in these fabricated Hadiths books of deception. Hear are few verse from Quran rejecting Hadiths.
These are the verses(Quran) of Allah which We recite to you in truth. Then in what statement(Hadith) after Allah and His verses(Quran) will they believe 45:6
Then in what statement(Hadith) after the Qur'an will they believe? 77:50
[Say], "Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book explained in detail?" And those to whom We [previously] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters. 6:114
May Allah keep us believer on the guide path. Peace and blessing be upon you. Abdullah
I have come to the same conclusion as you. and I am confused as to why other people aren't seeing it.
I see more Muslims adhering to the ahadiths rather than the Quran.
And I think it has created mass confusion within the Ummah
@@Oshianis Peace be upon.😊 Thanks someone is finally listening.
The reason why you are so confused about why other people aren't seeing it. Two word '' Brain wash. '' These scholar, sheik and Iman put these Hadiths into their lectures every time. So, if I keep repeat the same verses over and over soon or later you will start to believe.
Yes, and you will continue to see it. The teachers of Islam always telling their audience or students '' Order for you can understand the Quran you have to understand the Hadiths. The Quran ( Sunnah of Allah) is all you need. This is what the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) follow, not his own sunnah. That mean he would be disobey Allah(swt) commandment and mislead the Ummah if he following his own sunnah (Hadiths).
You're right ! It have create a mass confusion and this what Satan once.
[Say], "Then is it other than Allah I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book [i.e., the Qur’ān] explained in detail?" And those to whom We [previously] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters. 6 - 114 Q
And the word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can alter His words, and He is the Hearing, the Knowing. 6-115 Q
If you what true teaching all you need is the Quran and pray and ask for guidance. Peace be upon you. 😊 Quran only Muslim
@@ot5634 so let me ask you this- are you performing the prescribed prayers or no??
@@Oshianis Yes , I performing the prescribed salat that the Quran command us to do which is 3 time a day.
1 -Al-Fajr (Dawn Prayer) 24:58Q
2- Al-Salat Al-Wusta (The Middle Prayer) 2:238 Q
3- Salat Al-Isha (Night Prayer) 24:58 Q
@@ot5634 how do you perform the Salah?? Is that method of performance been passed down to you by your family?
Shabir is falling short of saying Islam does not apply to non arabs
Surah Fussilat (Quran. 41.44)
Had We revealed it as a non-Arabic Quran, THEY would have certainly argued, "If only its verses were made clear 'in our language'. What! A non - Arabic revelation for an Arab audience!" Say, 'O Prophet,' "It is a guide and a healing to the believers. As for those who DISBELIEVE, there is deafness in their ears and blindness to it 'in their hearts'. It is as if they are being called from a
faraway place."
It is not presumed context Shabir when the prophet said he was sent to fight the people the people referred to the Arab polytheists this is not even a question debated amongst scholars it is seriously concerning that you don’t know this- many other Hadiths and the seerah show that indeed the prophet had to fight until the Arab polytheists either converted or they were forced to leave Arabia!!! Abu bakr himself fought them when they refused to pay the zakat.
So when will Sunni boko haram Muslims stop terrorizing Nigeria?
Dr. Shabbir, is it true that Hoor Al Ayun, mentioned in the Quran, have been described as light-skinned women? Is this the case or has the mean been lost in the translation? please do reply.
He won't reply but I will.
*v.22 : The noun hūr - rendered by me as “companions pure” - is a plural of both ahwar (masc.) and hawrā’ (fem.), either of which describes “a person distinguished by hawar,” which latter term primarily denotes “intense whiteness of the eyeballs and lustrous black of the iris” (Qāmūs). In a more general sense, hawar signifies simply “whiteness” (Asās) or, as a moral qualification, “purity” (cf. Tabarī, Rāzī, and Ibn Kathīr in their explanations of the term hawāriyyūn in **3:52**). Hence, the compound expression hūr ‘īn signifies, approximately, “pure beings [or, more specifically, “companions pure”], most beautiful of eye” (which latter is the meaning of ‘īn, the plural of a‘yan). In his comments on the identical expression in **52:20**, Rāzī observes that inasmuch as a person’s eye reflects his soul more clearly than any other part of the human body, ‘īn may be understood as “rich of soul” or “soulful.” Mohamed Asad*
At-Taubah 9:29
قَٰتِلُوا۟ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَلَا بِٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْءَاخِرِ وَلَا يُحَرِّمُونَ مَا حَرَّمَ ٱللَّهُ وَرَسُولُهُۥ وَلَا يَدِينُونَ دِينَ ٱلْحَقِّ مِنَ ٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُوا۟ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ حَتَّىٰ يُعْطُوا۟ ٱلْجِزْيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُمْ صَٰغِرُونَ
Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.
This verse should also be problematic according to understanding of Shabir Aly. He is a hadith rejector for sure. He rejects Ahadith based on his own logic but when it comes to Quran He dares to do that so he says but this mean is not this, read the context etc. He is misleading many Muslims. He should fear Allah
ماشاءالله
Ibn Wabb radiyallahu anh one of the students of Imam Malik radiyallahu anh Saïd: i met Imam Malik because the science of hadith could be my dalal way.
For that it s Haram tout use the hadith if WE aren t mujtahid. In the hadith de have got the sanad and the matn. There is not ijma on the classification of narrators of ahadiths...
I think that Asians scholars are the best in that Time. More sincerity and hikma
Just coz something seems problematic you can't just throw it away especially if it has been deemed to authentic unless you can prove otherwise. If there's violence in authentic narrations, it is there...no point to sugarcoat Islam...
The only authentic text is the Quran, the Hadith aren't from God, but man.
What do you mean authentic? according to who? Use your God giving brain, Dr Shabir is trying to help u here,
The Quran is the revelation. Not the Ahadiths. Throw them out lol
At the end of all the discourse and interpretations and arguments...Islam is simply a blasphemy and a curse upon mankind! Jesus Christ is returning to defend Israel and destroy the Antichrist, MUSLIM Armies and to destroy the Beast..In the end, God wins!
Yuuuuuuup, Yeshua is dead and gone, sorry to break it to you. Do you even understand Christian history? How orthodox Christianity came to be? The original followers of Yeshua never considered him divine or even the Messiah, but simply a Prophet sent by God. So please spare me the nonsense of him returning, it's been two thousand years, he ain't coming back.
I so regularly hear that the Quran is perfect...flawless text from the prophet as dictated by the angel Gabriel(not God btw)... And all I hear from this gentleman is the claim that sections of the Quran are wrong... I believe that if Islam was the last revelation of God to man then such discrepancies wouldn't exist.
Read the New Testament, there's no violence, no executions, no polygamy... Just sincere peace... that book was wrote 700 years before Mohamnad aswell....
there are certain things Muslims really need to consider.
The same could be said about Christians, there is much they need to consider! The Old Testament is an integral part of the Christian faith and there is so much more violence then you will find in the Quran! In any case during the crusades some of the most horrible violence was committed against the Muslims and Jews, and justified on the basis of the Christian faith (the New and the Old Testament). More recently, in the last century, two of the bloodiest wars in history were initiated and fought in large part by people who considered themselves to be Christians! Hardly a resounding endorsement of Christianity as a religion of "sincere peace!"
That's not what he said, that's just what you chose to hear..
He is talking about hadith never ever he said any word of quran is wrong!!! Quran is full of peace also, and there is nothing bad on it alhamdulillah, i m a convert from cristianity myself and i convert only by reading many imes the quran and not finding any mistake! And the new testament is also beautiful, but most of the Christians don't follow anything of it, specially that Jesus never said he is God 🙏
Well. No more listening to shabir ally. Lol. Throwing out authentic Sunnah not best way to go
EmeraldDiamond3 He did not throw away the sunna dear brother. He is being very specific. Some hadith go directly against the Holy Quran. It doesn't matter if the hadith is authentic or not. Hadith is man's work. The Quran is God's word. Which one should you choose?
Salar Abbas Salar Abbas You do realize the Quran is also from muttawatir Hadith. Unless you think the Prophet (saw) hand wrote it and copied it for everyone. Which he didn't. Shabir ally has done the same thing with other authentic ahadith. Which is a huge favor to Islam haters as they can now question just about anything they want. Not to mention Uthman (ra) did burn some Qurans from other cultures to insure only the original text was being distributed. A fact even shabir ally agrees with. Well with that said who's to say Uthman(ra) didn't rewrite some himself ? We would never know unless you trust in the reports of thousands of companions of the prophet. Which we do. Shabir throws that away when he rejects authentic Sunnah. Essentially calling into question every Hadith. And the Quran itself.
EmeraldDiamond3 Dear brother. It is true that the Holy Quran also was passed on threw the same tradition. But there is no muttwatir hadith like the Quran. Name me 1 hadith that is the same muttwatir level as the Quran. There is none. And we muslims see the Quran as the infallible Word of God. Other hadith is man's work. The point is very simple. There are hadiths which clearly contradicts the Quran. What will you choose as most authentic?
The Quran says nothing about the Sunnah, the Prophet's only job was to recite it, nothing more, nothing left. The way of the Prophet was the Quran, the Hadith are man made.
You do realise if you don't throw away this hadith then you are throwing away rest of many hadiths which says do not kill people who have different belief than you? I hope you are okay with ditching all those hadiths because you want to hold on to this one? Why don't you take a flexible approach and understand the context rather than have an extreme approach!!!