Laplace Transform to Solve Differential Equations

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 25

  • @exodus5948
    @exodus5948 6 лет назад +1

    I will be satisfied once u finish the entire signal system playlist by april. I will indebted to you forever. Please upload all the remaining ones and complete the playlist.

  • @rahulripu
    @rahulripu 6 лет назад +7

    Please upload control system videos.

  • @phanindrareddy4885
    @phanindrareddy4885 6 лет назад +2

    Doing nice work by neso academy

  • @Kavithomas_Engineer
    @Kavithomas_Engineer 6 лет назад

    Very good detail explanation, but it's an simple concept sir, thank you.

  • @brosjay2131
    @brosjay2131 2 года назад

    Perfect. Absolutely perfect!!

  • @naptunegt7266
    @naptunegt7266 6 лет назад +5

    After completing signal and system start control system.
    Please sir.

  • @deshmetal
    @deshmetal 3 года назад +2

    " and as we are not having, more space here" this is gold XD

  • @neeshusharma5889
    @neeshusharma5889 Год назад

    In every video our voice is like robot ( i personally like that voice )

  • @prasad1284
    @prasad1284 3 года назад +1

    good job nice explanation :)

  • @examtips3913
    @examtips3913 6 лет назад +3

    Hello sir.. i have a dout ..
    According to differentation property
    df(t)/dt =sF(s)-f(0-) .. so why dont u put f(0) ??
    In maths we also put F(0) and F'(0)
    Reply ??

    • @anusmitsaha8604
      @anusmitsaha8604 3 года назад

      Because in maths we use unilateral laplace transform and in signals we use bilateral laplace transform. Sir have also very clearly said the difference between them in the introductory lecture and also in the properties of laplace transform.

  • @shaillybhai007
    @shaillybhai007 3 года назад

    considering x(0+) the right part of the LT(differential equation) is coming out to be zero.

  • @parthmittal5625
    @parthmittal5625 3 года назад

    Life saver! :)

  • @dipanjanmondal640
    @dipanjanmondal640 6 лет назад

    pls upload Z-transform videos

  • @bakourabdelghani3265
    @bakourabdelghani3265 5 лет назад +1

    i don t understand why you didn t take the ROC in consideration ??

  • @ganesharts4748
    @ganesharts4748 6 лет назад

    Plz start NW theory

  • @motibogale6226
    @motibogale6226 Год назад

    Why you did not consider this two x(+0) and y(+0)

  • @shibanikumari8291
    @shibanikumari8291 6 лет назад +1

    i don't understand one thing when to use to differentiation in time property and differntiation in frequency property....plzzz explain it

    • @chandanv925
      @chandanv925 6 лет назад

      Yes there is max two time differentiation in the question...
      But property like one time differentiation is used in this question..

  • @ArjunKumar-dv5fq
    @ArjunKumar-dv5fq 5 лет назад

    if initial condition are given

  • @qlz1.12
    @qlz1.12 6 лет назад

    Sir How much more tym will u take to over this playlist?

    • @exodus5948
      @exodus5948 6 лет назад

      prashant kumar singh More than 1.5 months i think...

  • @whytushar
    @whytushar 5 лет назад

    niice

  • @aayush5474
    @aayush5474 5 лет назад

    My boy even a blind man can see the partial fractions by just looking at them.Why are you trying to make the problem so long?

    • @Randsome1
      @Randsome1 5 месяцев назад

      There is option to skip