Did the 2060 steal your parking spot? There's a seething rage, hidden behind gritted teeth every time you talk about it, what did that card do to you, we need to know!?!?!
It's a disappointing card with a disappointing price, isn't that a good reason? In fact, throughout most of Europe, a brand new 2060 6GB costs almost as much as a 3060 12 GB. The used prices are not all that tempting either, averaging 75% of the new prices. Looks like demand is still high.
@@eye776 The 2060 has always struck me as a card with terrible value throughout its lifespan because they increased the price quite a bit compared to the 1060 6GB even
The Rtx 2060 came from a shitty generation with shitty Ray Tracing and jacked up prices for a technology nobody wanted or needed and forced it down our throats until it infected more and more games . Especially when the previous generation 1000 series was the best thing Nvidia has done in the history of their company and then Jensen said he needed a new leather jacket and decided that being a decent human being was unnecessary because he could get MORE MONEY if he screwed over the people and he lacks a conscious and is consumed by greed. You would have to pry vram out of his cold dead hands 😂 so yeah everything 1600 and 2000 series was utter garbage and so was 3000 and 4000 🙄 here’s wishing for the 5000 series but I’ll probably end up going AMD when they can replace my Gtx 1080 Ti for a reasonable price
I think you can still use FSR 1.0 through lossless scaling in Elden Ring, but yeah, this game is extremely demanding for it's visuals. One more thing that you didn't cover is the VRAM limitation. In some games on a 480 4GB the VRAM buffer was full (of course, it's 4K on 4GB!), so that means that the 8Gb version could handle it a lot better. Moreover, in Forza test 1070 can have some advantage since you can pull the Geometry and Textures up to Extreme and it will make a HUGE difference in visuals, for balancing the performance you could switch the shadows a bit lower or whatever else, but on 2060 this is not an option. Not trying to critisize, just a few things to reflect on. The video is great!
Just discovered this great channel. I love it when i stumble across channels this size. I know they will take off, content and delivery is excellent with next to no bullsh!t.
Interesting choices as I'd have thought that anything less than a 1080ti/RTX 2070 super/Radeon VII /5700xt would seriously struggle with 4k but was interesting to see what lower end cards could do at the resolutions.
Thanks! My mission this year has been to explore what's out there within a £200 budget. Who knows, next year I might be able do the same video with one of the cards you mentioned!
@@IcebergTechI reckon my 2080ti which in February cost me three and a half times that price is a bit underpowered at native 4k with RT settings enabled but dlss rescues things ;) . Did have a Vega 64 which could do 4k with high settings with indie titles and some older games like Nier Automata and Fallout 4 (Midnight Ride modlist) but newer things it really struggled with.
You're not alone in questioning AMD's RSR restrictions. But then, FSR started as RDNA-only too before throwing a bone to the 400 and 500 series, so here's hoping it will eventually come to the GPUs that need it most.
On AliExpress there are some mobile gpus that somehow been turned into desktop versions for a really reasonable price, like the rtx3060m and the rx6600m, these gpus draw less power btw. The only drawback is that not all sellers there are authentic and the gpu drivers are bit sketchy .
It's interesting to see how far scaling tech can lower the barrier to 4k, but personally I don't see the point in upscaling to 4k. If you can't play it natively are you really getting any visual quality bump? A thing I've discovered is that playing at the monitor's native resolution makes more of a difference than a strictly higher resolution. I have a 4k monitor for school/photo editing. But I also have a 1080p display to play newer games that I can't run at 4k on my 2060. Aside from the inherent anti-aliasing of the 4k resolution, in terms of sharpness and clarity I'm hard pressed to notice a difference when the monitor is using it's native resolution. In fact when I have headroom on the 1080p display I will use Nvidia's DSR feature and I think it's reasonably indistinguishable from 4k
Found a massive difference going from 1920x1200 24 inch to 4k 27 inch displays , even in gaming with both at native resolution. DSR might help with that but still takes a lot of power to run
@@tourmaline07 That's not surprising to me. 1920x1200 monitors ime have always been office monitors. With poor response times and contrast ratios so you tend to get a smudgy poor quality picture when gaming on them.
I never thought I'd feel blessed to have the Oz GPU market, but I can find FB listings of the 6600 for 200 AUD or around £120. xt is around £170. Maybe we have cheaper electricity over here so there were more miners?
That just shows how quickly prices have dropped! This video is less than two months old, and at the time a Vega 56 was between £160 and £180 on eBay. I was actually considering it for the £200 card, but I decided that DLSS made the 2060 a better choice for 4K.
where I live you can buy vega 64 for just over 100£ today on the used market and that's very much 4k capable but it will likely be on its last legs after years of nonstop mining but if you're looking for 4k under 100£ - that's your golden ticket
They are on Facebook in UK too! Facebook is the place to be cause people just wanna get rid no bullshit, I jumped in my wagon a few days ago and picked up a 3080 TI from a lady for £450.. Bargain of the century I have to say! She said it was her husband's who was away for work and he just upgraded to a 4090, Either they didn't care about the money or she made a mistake lol I didn't question.
where I live you can buy vega 64 for just over 100£ today on the used market and that's very much 4k capable but it will likely be on its last legs after years of nonstop mining back in the day mining in Russia was bigger than in the west due to cheap electricity, so now the market is flooded with cheap vegas that no one is buying because they're notoriously unreliable but if you're looking for 4k under 100£ - that's your golden ticket
I used my 980Ti for 4k quite often, in GTA V and War Thunder 60fps was not a problem on max details (with 1530 core, 4000 mem) This with Fury X and R9 290X were first cards that had 4k potential without SLI or CF setup imo But still... was really disappointed that Cyberpunk was playble only in 1080p on premiere despite Witcher 3 heaving 0 problems in 1440p 60fps with ton of graphic mods on and running on the same engine... oh and they got rid of CF and SLI support too
Eh, I'd really only include the 980 Ti and R9 290X in that list. The R9 Fury X certainly had decent horsepower for the time, but 4GB was pretty low for a $650 card even back then, and it certainly didn't hold up nearly as well as its Maxwell competitor (particularly at 4K).
@@DrearierSpider1 Oh yeah decision by AMD to stick to 4gb was not an ideal one to say the least, it sticked along due to share speed of HBM but 7 years later it starts to show With my 290X heaving modded 900mhz strap from 390X and 1420mhz memory overclock it just about makes with 3,8-3,9gb usage in most titles but then you expect Fury to be a step up from it right?
The PS5 actually runs God of War at between 1440p and 4K on the PS5. Rarely does the PS5 hit native 4K. There's almost always some sort of upscaling used and dynamic resolution used. Very good upscaling mind you. However, sometimes, it's very clearly running at 1440p more than 4k, such as in spider man remastered.
We should pity the poor filthy console pheasants, trying to grasp controllers in their talons, manipulating sticks and buttons with their delicious wings...
on my gtx1070 in cyberpunk I had to go down to 1440p on my 4k monitor and even then I had to use XESS for stable performance so yeah, 1070 is not enough for cyberpunk in 4k unless you want to play a 4k potato or a 4k slideshow
10:50 It’s checkerboarded 4k on PS4 Pro and PS5, not native. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, image reconstruction is a good solution when you’re GPU limited. Just saying why it’s more demanding at native 4k than might be expected.
A 4gb card playing anything from the last 10 years at 4K is eye opening and very telling that the ever increasing need for more and more Vram is more about defeating bad optimization on the software side rather than genuine Vram inadequacy
Considering all the latest developments with FSR3 and DSL and even those being able to benefit for each other, would you say this video still is relevant? Or would there be a new selection of gpu's with the current market?
why the 2060 struggling so much on cyberbug? I have GTX 1080 TI with i7 6700k at 4.7ghz with high settings and FSR at quality for nearly locked 60FPS. Side note the resolution your showing not 4K that's UHD 4K is 4096x2160 and my EVGA GTX 1080 TI i got on eBay for £134 including delivery around year ago when they was going for over £500. Deals always to be had if look for them
i got for my 2nd pc a rx480 8gb for 70€ and it is running great in my games at 4k and in the main pc is running a rtx 2060 which is in most games a really capeable 4k card
i know this vids about gpus but i thought its worth saying if your looking to play cyberpunk and have an AMD GPU then FSR 2.1 is an option you can turn on that's basically AMDs version of DLSS but works amazingly i cant notice a difference in image when i use it but my fps is up above 60 all the time on high and medium settings so try that before you go looking at spending good money on a new gpu
I play older games @4k all the time id always rather have older GPU & newer screen since you can always just lower your resolution when ever you want, you cant make a lower res screen output higher
To be fair, we all know the consoles didn't ACTUALLY do 4K, apart from in 2 titles or very, very old games "remastered". They were more like 1440p upscaled to 4K interpolated, and largely locked at 30fps. Asking for 4K out of these cards is ridiculous, especially on modern games. Playing much older games in 4K is still viable, and a lot of fun, with titles like Age Of Mythology Extended Edition, Morrowind with Graphics Extender, Stardew Valley - etc. But anyone with a 4K display, even if they are using a 43" 4K TV, will not be skimping by spending £100-£200 on a GPU to run 4K gaming unless they have a screw loose. Who would pick 4K and high details but 10-15fps, over 1080p and high details and a smooth 60fps? And who would run 4K with FSR/DSR and lowest quality settings just to get that magic 60fps, when the games now look like a washed out messes? In short, 4K gaming starts at a 1080Ti / RX 5700 if you want to sacrifice quality settings, but is much more suited to the RX 6700 XT / RTX 2080 territory. All of which can be had at very decent price on the used market. MUCH less than a good 4K or Monitor costs.
I had a 6800xt and I've tried FSR, while pointless for the most part, it didn't look good at all, But I got me a good deal on a 3080ti, and DLSS, I've vary impressed with it, as long as you don't use Ultra Performance its actually pretty hard to tell its being upscaled, especially in them games that have a lot of camera effects.
That's odd, I played cyberpunk 2077 with my 2070 on balanced dlss with ultra settings on "3.8k" (samsung odyssey g9 5120x1440) with an average of 65-75fps. Probably your capture card fakes the results, like you had very bad cache sync problems (due to disabled vsync).
I'm not planning on being one of those channels that gives people unrealistic expectations of what kind of deals they can get on the secondhand market. In the UK right now you can pick up a GTX 1060 6GB for about £130, and an 8GB RX 5500 XT for £150-160. An RX 480 4GB costs £85-95. Sure, you can find better deals if you're patient and lucky, but these should be achievable by just about anyone.
@@IcebergTech what about 580? I have to admit, I'm not from uk, so irrelevant, but on our used market there's a number of 1060s and 580s for around 100-105 gbp. Other than 480, everything else was exactly as i would pick myself, no objections there
@@romanthegambler6966 Yes, the 580 costs about the same as the 480. It's the same card, just with an extra PCIE power socket and ~100MHz higher clocks. As I already have the RX 480 I didn't feel the need to buy a 580.
@@IcebergTech a 4k card might benefit from 4 more gigs of vram, as 480 has only 4, I'd say, there's a potential bottleneck, but i have no way to prove or test it out, as i only have a 1066 and a 5700xt
Its fun bot nobody buys a GPU to barely play older games. Everybody buys to be somewhat future proof for a few years if possible. These are 1080p cards for at least 2 more years.
Yeah for the most part but if you just want something to play mostly older games at like 1080p you don't have to buy top of the line or even midrange cards. Honestly most new games don't even seem worth buying
My NITRO 5 Came with an RTX 3060 and no way it can Run 4K Games any better than 10 FPS or worst. This Video is kind of impossible to Believe because of this. I even Upgraded to 32 GB of Ram and a Great SSD and still do not Run in 4K. RTX 3060 Runs 1080p at HIGH on None-Demanding Games or 1080p Low on High demanding Games. Not even 1080p EPIC on any Game. Somebody is Lying in this Video...
Forza didn't have FSR when this video came out and Lossless Scaling doesn't work with it...... Unless you managed to get a beta build somehow? NGL this kind of hurts this entire video's credibility.
Did the 2060 steal your parking spot? There's a seething rage, hidden behind gritted teeth every time you talk about it, what did that card do to you, we need to know!?!?!
It's a disappointing card with a disappointing price, isn't that a good reason?
In fact, throughout most of Europe, a brand new 2060 6GB costs almost as much as a 3060 12 GB.
The used prices are not all that tempting either, averaging 75% of the new prices. Looks like demand is still high.
That’s between me and the card 😡
@@eye776 The 2060 has always struck me as a card with terrible value throughout its lifespan because they increased the price quite a bit compared to the 1060 6GB even
The Rtx 2060 came from a shitty generation with shitty Ray Tracing and jacked up prices for a technology nobody wanted or needed and forced it down our throats until it infected more and more games . Especially when the previous generation 1000 series was the best thing Nvidia has done in the history of their company and then Jensen said he needed a new leather jacket and decided that being a decent human being was unnecessary because he could get MORE MONEY if he screwed over the people and he lacks a conscious and is consumed by greed. You would have to pry vram out of his cold dead hands 😂 so yeah everything 1600 and 2000 series was utter garbage and so was 3000 and 4000 🙄 here’s wishing for the 5000 series but I’ll probably end up going AMD when they can replace my Gtx 1080 Ti for a reasonable price
@@IcebergTechagreed, they know what they did 😡
God dude this channel just keeps getting better and better
I think you can still use FSR 1.0 through lossless scaling in Elden Ring, but yeah, this game is extremely demanding for it's visuals. One more thing that you didn't cover is the VRAM limitation. In some games on a 480 4GB the VRAM buffer was full (of course, it's 4K on 4GB!), so that means that the 8Gb version could handle it a lot better. Moreover, in Forza test 1070 can have some advantage since you can pull the Geometry and Textures up to Extreme and it will make a HUGE difference in visuals, for balancing the performance you could switch the shadows a bit lower or whatever else, but on 2060 this is not an option. Not trying to critisize, just a few things to reflect on. The video is great!
Just discovered this great channel. I love it when i stumble across channels this size. I know they will take off, content and delivery is excellent with next to no bullsh!t.
Neo is MJ Mulk and i hate the ilLuM team
Interesting choices as I'd have thought that anything less than a 1080ti/RTX 2070 super/Radeon VII /5700xt would seriously struggle with 4k but was interesting to see what lower end cards could do at the resolutions.
Thanks! My mission this year has been to explore what's out there within a £200 budget. Who knows, next year I might be able do the same video with one of the cards you mentioned!
@@IcebergTechI reckon my 2080ti which in February cost me three and a half times that price is a bit underpowered at native 4k with RT settings enabled but dlss rescues things ;) . Did have a Vega 64 which could do 4k with high settings with indie titles and some older games like Nier Automata and Fallout 4 (Midnight Ride modlist) but newer things it really struggled with.
@@tourmaline07my 2080ti has a light vram overclock and crushes native 4K with rtx at ultra. Although with my old 6700K it kinda struggled.
You're not alone in questioning AMD's RSR restrictions. But then, FSR started as RDNA-only too before throwing a bone to the 400 and 500 series, so here's hoping it will eventually come to the GPUs that need it most.
The content on this channel is genuinely so good! Keep up the great work man much love from the USA 🇺🇸
UK people never bough these 4k 120 TV's ?
On AliExpress there are some mobile gpus that somehow been turned into desktop versions for a really reasonable price, like the rtx3060m and the rx6600m, these gpus draw less power btw. The only drawback is that not all sellers there are authentic and the gpu drivers are bit sketchy .
On aliexpress there are even rx 5700xt at the 160$ range, this card is perfect for 1440p 60.
It's interesting to see how far scaling tech can lower the barrier to 4k, but personally I don't see the point in upscaling to 4k. If you can't play it natively are you really getting any visual quality bump? A thing I've discovered is that playing at the monitor's native resolution makes more of a difference than a strictly higher resolution. I have a 4k monitor for school/photo editing. But I also have a 1080p display to play newer games that I can't run at 4k on my 2060. Aside from the inherent anti-aliasing of the 4k resolution, in terms of sharpness and clarity I'm hard pressed to notice a difference when the monitor is using it's native resolution. In fact when I have headroom on the 1080p display I will use Nvidia's DSR feature and I think it's reasonably indistinguishable from 4k
Found a massive difference going from 1920x1200 24 inch to 4k 27 inch displays , even in gaming with both at native resolution. DSR might help with that but still takes a lot of power to run
@@tourmaline07 That's not surprising to me. 1920x1200 monitors ime have always been office monitors. With poor response times and contrast ratios so you tend to get a smudgy poor quality picture when gaming on them.
Got platinum on Sekiro, GoW, Elden Ring, Days Gone, etc, at 4K/1800p 30FPS with a Athlon 200GE @4.0GHz, 16GB @2666, and a RX 570 8GB...
I was just looking for this! Perfect timing. Love your content
the rx 6600 is almost at 200 pounds more or less in second hand and performs good
I never thought I'd feel blessed to have the Oz GPU market, but I can find FB listings of the 6600 for 200 AUD or around £120. xt is around £170. Maybe we have cheaper electricity over here so there were more miners?
I think a vega 56 may be a better pick for the £150 price point for 4K than the 1070
That just shows how quickly prices have dropped! This video is less than two months old, and at the time a Vega 56 was between £160 and £180 on eBay. I was actually considering it for the £200 card, but I decided that DLSS made the 2060 a better choice for 4K.
Used 3060s have started to dip into the 200-pound range used.
Note that the PS4 Pro didn't use Polaris. That was only for the One X.
Your videos are so amazing dude, you should be incredibly proud of your level of quality
GTX 1080 can be found preowned for £200 or less. 30fps 4K is playable on any modern game that's decently optimised at medium to high.
where I live you can buy vega 64 for just over 100£ today on the used market and that's very much 4k capable
but it will likely be on its last legs after years of nonstop mining
but if you're looking for 4k under 100£ - that's your golden ticket
Vega 56 would have been a good £150 candidate.
Surprised the Vega cards aren’t mentioned, nowadays they’re 75-100$ and surpass all of the candidates here when properly tweaked
17:27 very smooth
Keep up the great content good sir! 💪💪
Thanks again 🙏
I just got yesterday a 2060 super for 200$ and 3080 TI for 500$. Deals are crazy right now in Facebook Marketplace here in USA!
They are on Facebook in UK too! Facebook is the place to be cause people just wanna get rid no bullshit, I jumped in my wagon a few days ago and picked up a 3080 TI from a lady for £450.. Bargain of the century I have to say! She said it was her husband's who was away for work and he just upgraded to a 4090, Either they didn't care about the money or she made a mistake lol I didn't question.
Well, if you stick to 30/45 fps locked at 4k on slow paced games, you’re good!
Good video but a frustrating number of adverts.
5:50 omg you killed bob!
where I live you can buy vega 64 for just over 100£ today on the used market and that's very much 4k capable
but it will likely be on its last legs after years of nonstop mining
back in the day mining in Russia was bigger than in the west due to cheap electricity, so now the market is flooded with cheap vegas that no one is buying because they're notoriously unreliable
but if you're looking for 4k under 100£ - that's your golden ticket
I used my 980Ti for 4k quite often, in GTA V and War Thunder 60fps was not a problem on max details (with 1530 core, 4000 mem)
This with Fury X and R9 290X were first cards that had 4k potential without SLI or CF setup imo
But still... was really disappointed that Cyberpunk was playble only in 1080p on premiere despite Witcher 3 heaving 0 problems in 1440p 60fps with ton of graphic mods on and running on the same engine... oh and they got rid of CF and SLI support too
Eh, I'd really only include the 980 Ti and R9 290X in that list. The R9 Fury X certainly had decent horsepower for the time, but 4GB was pretty low for a $650 card even back then, and it certainly didn't hold up nearly as well as its Maxwell competitor (particularly at 4K).
@@DrearierSpider1 Oh yeah decision by AMD to stick to 4gb was not an ideal one to say the least, it sticked along due to share speed of HBM but 7 years later it starts to show
With my 290X heaving modded 900mhz strap from 390X and 1420mhz memory overclock it just about makes with 3,8-3,9gb usage in most titles but then you expect Fury to be a step up from it right?
heyyy i play war thunder on a 980 Ti aswel! do you wanna play with me?
@@Pelliq_E Sure sometime, I don't have too much time due to trenings but nick is SamuraiPilot if you catch me online
Wonder if Lossless Scaling would help you out with that 480 and 1070
Another informative video, excellent.
The PS5 actually runs God of War at between 1440p and 4K on the PS5.
Rarely does the PS5 hit native 4K. There's almost always some sort of upscaling used and dynamic resolution used.
Very good upscaling mind you. However, sometimes, it's very clearly running at 1440p more than 4k, such as in spider man remastered.
If we're using a Console Developer's approach to defining our PC gaming settings, then we're no better than filthy console pheasants!
We should pity the poor filthy console pheasants, trying to grasp controllers in their talons, manipulating sticks and buttons with their delicious wings...
thanks for making this video. I am really grateful.
Great video, I gave you a shoutout in my Quadro M4000 project:)
You need to channel your inner Brian to find a 200£ 2080 Super 🙏
I got a 4K 144Hz monitor for my RTX 3080 laptop (100W TGP) and it's great!
on my gtx1070 in cyberpunk I had to go down to 1440p on my 4k monitor and even then I had to use XESS for stable performance
so yeah, 1070 is not enough for cyberpunk in 4k unless you want to play a 4k potato or a 4k slideshow
I cant even set my monitor to 30hz lol, it just says in input not supported.
10:50 It’s checkerboarded 4k on PS4 Pro and PS5, not native. Not that there’s anything wrong with that, image reconstruction is a good solution when you’re GPU limited. Just saying why it’s more demanding at native 4k than might be expected.
A 4gb card playing anything from the last 10 years at 4K is eye opening and very telling that the ever increasing need for more and more Vram is more about defeating bad optimization on the software side rather than genuine Vram inadequacy
At this point, anything under $300 could be considered budget. It would be nice to see what cards are good at those tiers too.
The 580 8gb is going for $100 on ebay
British market is not the same. In SEA 580 8GB are going for like $80 US including tax from official resellers. US isn't end all be all.
Considering all the latest developments with FSR3 and DSL and even those being able to benefit for each other, would you say this video still is relevant? Or would there be a new selection of gpu's with the current market?
In the US, you could see RX 5700 XTs going for under $200 US. So yeah, if you are that fortunate, go with that instead or something.
Surprised that the 1080 Ti wasn't on this list.
Would love to see a 1440p version of this
Watching this on Nov 2023, you could do an update this year.
Great content glad to subscribe
Hey do you think could do a video on the r9 295x2? Super cool card!
Now, the rx 6600 could be part of this holy quartet.
What about the nvidia shield? Stream from 1080p on pc and shield will upscale it to 4k 60 on TV? Wouldn't that be a valid setup?
I play COD MW2 on my GTX 1070 with 60-80 FPS at 3440x1440. Its ok but I definitely need to upgrade my GPU...
"Au contraire, Randy, au contraire." If you get the reference you are the goat. ;)
why the 2060 struggling so much on cyberbug? I have GTX 1080 TI with i7 6700k at 4.7ghz with high settings and FSR at quality for nearly locked 60FPS.
Side note the resolution your showing not 4K that's UHD 4K is 4096x2160 and my EVGA GTX 1080 TI i got on eBay for £134 including delivery around year ago when they was going for over £500. Deals always to be had if look for them
i got for my 2nd pc a rx480 8gb for 70€ and it is running great in my games at 4k and in the main pc is running a rtx 2060 which is in most games a really capeable 4k card
i know this vids about gpus but i thought its worth saying if your looking to play cyberpunk and have an AMD GPU then FSR 2.1 is an option you can turn on that's basically AMDs version of DLSS but works amazingly i cant notice a difference in image when i use it but my fps is up above 60 all the time on high and medium settings so try that before you go looking at spending good money on a new gpu
I play older games @4k all the time id always rather have older GPU & newer screen since you can always just lower your resolution when ever you want, you cant make a lower res screen output higher
To be fair, we all know the consoles didn't ACTUALLY do 4K, apart from in 2 titles or very, very old games "remastered". They were more like 1440p upscaled to 4K interpolated, and largely locked at 30fps.
Asking for 4K out of these cards is ridiculous, especially on modern games. Playing much older games in 4K is still viable, and a lot of fun, with titles like Age Of Mythology Extended Edition, Morrowind with Graphics Extender, Stardew Valley - etc.
But anyone with a 4K display, even if they are using a 43" 4K TV, will not be skimping by spending £100-£200 on a GPU to run 4K gaming unless they have a screw loose.
Who would pick 4K and high details but 10-15fps, over 1080p and high details and a smooth 60fps? And who would run 4K with FSR/DSR and lowest quality settings just to get that magic 60fps, when the games now look like a washed out messes?
In short, 4K gaming starts at a 1080Ti / RX 5700 if you want to sacrifice quality settings, but is much more suited to the RX 6700 XT / RTX 2080 territory. All of which can be had at very decent price on the used market. MUCH less than a good 4K or Monitor costs.
Great price analysis
Did you try with Lossless scaling ? It's an app who can bring FSR and others upscaler in all games
Vega 64 would be a good option in the UK (under £200 at CeX)
Would say a Vega 56 would be a better option there. For £200, you can get a 5700XT now
@@Amusia727 While you may be able to get a 5700xt 2nd hand for 200 or less I always go with cex due to the 2yr warranty
If we go back to this, rx 5700xt is a stellar deal
next video title: 1440p gaming under £50
Now there's an idea! I mean, it wouldn't be NEW games...
I've got two gtx 1080ti's £180 so would be interested in how they perform at 4k
underrated channel.
any gpu can game at 4k low settings.
"It's raining graphics cards out there right now..." Where? I can barely find an RX570 for under 100€ in my country. I think you mean in USA.
Yeah because this guy is clearly an American lol. Sounds like a Californian to me for sure
I had a 6800xt and I've tried FSR, while pointless for the most part, it didn't look good at all, But I got me a good deal on a 3080ti, and DLSS, I've vary impressed with it, as long as you don't use Ultra Performance its actually pretty hard to tell its being upscaled, especially in them games that have a lot of camera effects.
Can get 5700/xt for around 205 210
Meanwhile I play at 1440p ultrawide with a 4090 lol
Also you TRULY sound like the late TotalBiscuit
in poland you can buy rx 5700 xt for 160$
200dollars is used rx580 where i live kekw,2060 is 300-350
Witcher is more than playable, if you had used Vulkan instead of dx11.
They have GTX 1080's on ebay for $160.
Id call cap but Im legit just interested, mind sending a link?
The 6600 XT is about £230 atm and is about = 3060
Rx6650xt is the new buy
0:21 sorry but half a billion pixels?last i checked 4k was 8.2m pixels
8.2m * 60 (frames per second) = 492m pixels.
"Half a billion pixels ... every second"
@@IcebergTech aah! Brain fart my bad
That's odd, I played cyberpunk 2077 with my 2070 on balanced dlss with ultra settings on "3.8k" (samsung odyssey g9 5120x1440) with an average of 65-75fps.
Probably your capture card fakes the results, like you had very bad cache sync problems (due to disabled vsync).
rx480 for 4k? I bet there are rx5500/-xt models out there that would be much better for a similar price, or gtx1066 even, why 480?
I'm not planning on being one of those channels that gives people unrealistic expectations of what kind of deals they can get on the secondhand market. In the UK right now you can pick up a GTX 1060 6GB for about £130, and an 8GB RX 5500 XT for £150-160. An RX 480 4GB costs £85-95. Sure, you can find better deals if you're patient and lucky, but these should be achievable by just about anyone.
@@IcebergTech what about 580? I have to admit, I'm not from uk, so irrelevant, but on our used market there's a number of 1060s and 580s for around 100-105 gbp. Other than 480, everything else was exactly as i would pick myself, no objections there
@@romanthegambler6966 Yes, the 580 costs about the same as the 480. It's the same card, just with an extra PCIE power socket and ~100MHz higher clocks. As I already have the RX 480 I didn't feel the need to buy a 580.
@@IcebergTech a 4k card might benefit from 4 more gigs of vram, as 480 has only 4, I'd say, there's a potential bottleneck, but i have no way to prove or test it out, as i only have a 1066 and a 5700xt
Its fun bot nobody buys a GPU to barely play older games. Everybody buys to be somewhat future proof for a few years if possible. These are 1080p cards for at least 2 more years.
Yeah for the most part but if you just want something to play mostly older games at like 1080p you don't have to buy top of the line or even midrange cards. Honestly most new games don't even seem worth buying
try the 6650xt
theres a difference between able and can game at 4K
Nobody ever thinks about the RX 5700 non XT
lol i 4k gamed with gtx 10603gb but like on 7th-6th gen games
My NITRO 5 Came with an RTX 3060 and no way it can Run 4K Games any better than 10 FPS or worst. This Video is kind of impossible to Believe because of this. I even Upgraded to 32 GB of Ram and a Great SSD and still do not Run in 4K. RTX 3060 Runs 1080p at HIGH on None-Demanding Games or 1080p Low on High demanding Games. Not even 1080p EPIC on any Game. Somebody is Lying in this Video...
Rx 6600 🖤♥️
im so sad bro i tried to watch your video at 4k but my wifi caps at 25 mbs i guess i dont need to get a m.2 drive now 😥
you should have tried the 5600xt its £150 and faster than a rtx 2060
Totally agree had this card before i got a rx Vega 56, both amazing cards!
rx6600 can be had for $200 or less. It's much better than RTX 2060
5700xt
A750 200.00
Dont kill jack you monster! I know you watch el kryzpo!
2023 update ¿
You could've got a 6600 for 200 actually
Forza didn't have FSR when this video came out and Lossless Scaling doesn't work with it...... Unless you managed to get a beta build somehow?
NGL this kind of hurts this entire video's credibility.
Try the rx 6600 it's 250
The 2060 is worse than the 1660 super in rasta performance
Just remember if you use less than 100% resolution scale it is cheating.
P opposite