fantastic 🌹 isn't it weird that the Monolith perfectly encapsulates something modern Homo sapiens have become so accustomed to..the smartphone. Kubrik & Clarke approached tech companies for futuristic envishionment so it may not be a coincidence
I enjoyed the missing part of Kubrick's moon ship leaving the space station. Kubrick just cut to the moon ship heading towards the moon. You gave it context. Good job with the details.
Fantastic video. It just confirms that 2001: A Space Odyssey is has been and will always be THE BEST MOVIE EVER MADE periiod. It will NEVER BE SURPASSED.
A most magnificently done tribute, it took me back to when I first saw the film in an Edinburgh cinema in the sixties, sitting enthralled in the middle of the main balcony watching the twin-wheeled space station in all its glory, which you have captured so well!
Amazing and beautiful. You perfectly captured the feeling of each key scene, details timing music. So good! One of my all time favorite films, too. Well done!!
2001: A Space Odyssey could not have been made today due to no African Americans, lesbians or transsexuals. On top of that, white males are not portrayed as evil.
probably not as inspirational, when we show how restrictions can't stop us, that is what inspires people. I think when people watched it for the first time it was like viewing a magic show. "how did they do that?" with every scene. now when I watch a movie I just say, "oh, probably CGI."
I know its a huge step from here, to getting VA's and soundtracks, but it would really good to see more of Clarke's works (and a few others) put out there like this. The irony could be, if you follow the books close enough, when Hollywood sees that it's popular, it will be hard for them to mess with the story lines, if people can point to RUclips and say, "But here..." Oops, almost forgot; Brilliant piece of work there.
Remarkable! Some of these scenes could have been interchanged with those of the movie! The Discovery sequence was PARTICULARLY well done - and the juxtapositioning of the Monolith and HAL's faceplate was thought-provoking!
I love this tribute, its lucid, flowing momentum is mesmirising, the music combined with the visuals is a feast for the senses. 2001 ASO will always remain my most cherished movie experience.
Excellent work! FYI, the ‘track’ running along the floor to the door of the Parts/Equipment Store at 10:53 isn’t meant to be there. It was to accommodate the film camera.
@@marcusanimation100 Nice touch, Please excuse my presumption! Have you seen the recent 2001 uploads on the OTOY channel? Check them out. It’s a trailer of sorts and a short documentary on 2001.
A beautiful tribute. Great job! Just thinking about the work needed to make the original (models, sets, film processing ...) its amazing how the technology now enables this kind of production by individuals.
Cool! I like how you matched the monolith and HAL at the end, which is an association I think Kubrick made on purpose. Though the "my God it's full of stars" isn't at all a Kubrick thing, it's just in the Clarke 2001 universe. I missed seeing the "IBM" nameplate on the flight computer in the Orion III spaceplane cockpit.
What a brilliant film,one of my many favourite science fiction films Kubrick is a visionary of film, the same as George Lucas as well,and a brilliant book by Arthur.c.clarke.
2 month ago i decided to finally watch this movie to understand the influence of this film, and now is my favorite sci-fi movies about the space, i liked the another perspective of the "Also Sprach Zarathustra" and the docking and launch of the moon lander sequences, the Discovery one is so well done and magnificent that i can feel Kubrick made it! , my favorite part about this tribute is 12:30 "My god it's full of stars" from the sequel, 2010: The Year We Make Contact (Odyssey Two) (i liked the movie and the book) and how Hal is represented if it was the monolith all of this time and watching how Hal watchs the born of the first Stellar baby, is just inspirational, amazing and beautiful tribute!! :D Poor Frank, but i liked that too :]
Ha ha! My time was well spent after all! Thanks for noticing! I also corrected the rotation direction of the spacestation (exterior shot), and the rotation of the sun (interior shot).
I enjoyed this. I do believe I'm eager to see your work in a VR world game on Steam Channel. It would be so cool to sit in the seat of the each craft, space walk over Jupiter. Extract the AE-35 unit. Nice work.
2001 was so far ahead of its time, the effects still hold up. its viewed as boring by todays standards but in 1968 it amazed, yes I was an 11yo boy who went to see it. hard to imagine this came out before man landed on the moon really well done and executed. you used Blender for this? impressive, as a 3D hobby I use Houdini
日本が映ってる！ Japan is shown! Nice view of the cockpit of the PanAm shuttle. Glad to see the scene of the lunar module launching from the station! The depiction of the earth is a little too crisp, I would have liked a little fuzzy texture and tint in an analog way. In the scene where the shuttle enters the square dog of the space station, It would be best if there was a rear-projection-like depiction of the personnel working inside the station!
Have you thought of trying to animate things from Clarke's un-adapted Odyssey novels, 2061 and 3001? I'd love to see Mount Zeus and the space elevators.
En 1968, tout ça, c'était des jouets, des maquettes, des transparences et du contreplaqué. C'était Méliès et coûtait des millions de dollars. Aujourd'hui, cinq garçons font tout cela avec leur carte graphique NVIDIA dans leur chambre.
Are you sure you are not thinking of the Aries space shuttle, that travels from the spacestation to the moon? In that, the flight crew sat facing a window in the "top" of the craft.
@@marcusanimation100 Hi Marcus. No. There is a scene in the film, during one of the pod EVAs where we see a crewman (not sure which one. Yellow Spacesuit) sitting in the cockpit facing a large control panel. The windows can be seen above his head. There does seem to be some inconsistency in the sets as the exterior shots do look much like your model. I have a screen shot of the interior but it seems I can't post it here. All the best, Jeff
A solid B+ .... as your TEXTURE MAPS needed some more randomizing on the Space Station as the 'flopping' was too noticeable on the Orion entrance. That and the STAR FIELD in the titles were repeated. Not that it matters, but I worked for Douglas Trumbull in the mid-80's at ShowScan and he'd notice it too. Otherwise, great work. Keep at it. BRAVO-! D.A.
I have an odd workflow, dropping shots into the editor timeline and shifting them, and adding new shots until it feels complete, or until I am bored and want to animate something else! 😆
I think modernizing this and other absolute classic science fiction movie takes away the flavour of the movie it’s supposed to gritty,dark and dirty not a sterile fairy tale some movies editing and modernizing does it justice some don’t 2001 ain’t about a pristine pretty paradise!
@@marcusanimation100 the original was done in 1968, I don't think they were satisfied with the pyrotechnics they could have used back then, so they chose to have "invisible" rocket exhaust instead. I have seen some other animations of vehicles landing on the Moon. The intent in 2001 was to make those vehicles as realistic as possible back then, I'm sure if they had the technology then that we have today, they would have chosen to show rocket exhaust and dust being kicked up on the Moon, but they we limited to what they had back then, and they didn't want to stick fire crackers at the ends of their models, because then it would have looked more fake than if they didn't show rocket exhaust at all.
I agree. In this case, I tried to match the original. I did try and fix the space station rotation direction, and sun position in other shots though...
At the risk of being run off the internet for suggesting this the ONE CHANGE I would like to see done to _both_ *2OO1: A SPACE ODYSSEY* and *2O1O: THE YEAR WE MAKE CONTACT* -- and I presume it could be done with CGI -- would be to put the _wings_ back on *_Discovery One._* *_Discovery One_* was nuclear powered, so it would require external heat radiators to manage the waste hea produced by the reactors, just like all other nuclear reactors do. The design for *_Discovery_* originally included them, but they were eventually removed because it was feared 1960s audiences would not understand why _Discovery_ had _wings._ The two projections on the sides of the propulsion module, which remained in the film, eere where the radiators would have been mounted.
@marcusanimation100 I imagine they'd have to be as big as the rear ones. But spaceprobes do indeed flip over for orbital insertion burn. Cassini had to flip over twice because the high gain antenna was used as a shield as it passed through Saturn's ring plane. It then flipped over to fire its engine before flipping again to present its high gain antenna as a shield.
Stanley Kubrick era muy preciso en cuanto a fuentes de luz se refiere,y , al principio de este video se ve la tierra iluminada por algún sol, luego aparece el sol detrás de la tierra. Sí este es un video-tributo , creo que se debió cuidar mucho más ese aspecto.
Yes, I probably had too much light on the Earth before the sun comes into view. However, I had to rotate the scene 90 degrees because the youtube algorithm complained it was a clip from the movie, so I was still fairly close to the original! 😁
Beautiful recap. Given the recent developments in ai, the original film and now this recap, eh? Don't know if I buy into HAL's going off of his rails or not, I suspect that HAL's rails bit it a literary hook of some sort. Still, beautify written, acted, and presented. Really liked the film's and now, this recap's emphasis on Newton's Laws of Motion, With rockets? Why only rockets? Why not toss for good measure, or a measure of Huygens' just because you could? ... as in... Y' know, there might be a different solution to some of this, maybe. F=ma=(m*v^2)/r, as in Huygens' equation for uniform circular motion. As in a rock on an end of a string being twirled? Where the rock is the mass, 'm.' Mass moving in a uniform circular motion. Water being pumped through a circular tube of 3" ID at a rate of 3 gallons per second, by a centrifugal pump like those found in fire engines that can pump 600 gallons per minute --- if you think of this circular pipe having a radius of about 10' and if the circular tube is folded roughly along its diameter to about 20 degrees then the equation then can be expressed as F = 2*cos(10 degrees)*[(25^3)/10] = 1.5 short tons, about (if you assume a path of 25' or so, not a full circumference then, sounds like. And other than keeping the water in its liquid state and having enough power to run the cited pump at 25 pounds per (about3 gal) second and the system doesn't spring a leak (maybe self-sealing like fighter plane gas tanks?), I think that it might work. Nothing fancy here, just High School level Physics or Geometry. Best of luck. So if you have a fresh sheet of paper with a circle drawn on it, you can draw little arrow counter clockwise with little squares next to the little arrows, all the way around (that 'right-hand rule' for vector cross products). Fold the sheet along the circle's diameter to about 20 degrees with the drawings on the outside where you can see ‘em, and there you go. A demonstration of how to keep the ‘crossed product’ vectors from canceling each out out? I guess? Then you can get some flexible plastic tubing, a yardstick (that has on it a marked 18" spot for a balance beam and some counter weight masses), an empty 2 liter pop bottle for a water tank, some tape, cardboard to fold into a 20-degree wedge shape, some string to string everything up and 'there you go, again.' Happy tinkering. & y' can talk over any of this to anyone y' want. High School Physics, that sort of thing. I don’t think that either the NSA or the CIA would get too excited.
@@pi.actual Do I really look that old in my picture? I'm not even 50 years old yet. 😄 So no I didn't see it in 68. But even if I had this movie would still be lame. The passage of decades doesn't make it any better any more than the passage of decades has made the Star Wars prequels any better (although I will happily concede that they are infinitely better than anything that Disney has put out).
I enjoyed 2001 and 2010, though very different in styles.As 2001 is consistently in best movie lists, I think saying it sucked puts you in a minority. I can see how the pacing and disjointedness would put people off though...
It's not as though we were not critical back in 1968. For instance, with a nuclear powered spacecraft that could make it all the way to Jupiter why did Frank's suit have a stupid rubber hose sticking out the back of the helmet just waiting to get caught on something? But to say it "sucked" and was "unwatchable garbage" is not a credible opinion in my mind.
@@pi.actual Im sorry you think my opinion isnt credible simply because I didnt like a movie that you enjoy? Precisely what isnt credible about it? 2001 had an incredibly vapid ending that served no purpose other than to draw a bunch of drugged up hippies to movie theaters. It was a gimmick to get butts in seats and it has aged very poorly. And like all art project films the story was boring and the ending was nonsensical. Plus nothing was resolved in the film. One guy died the other dude went into the monolith and the computer driven mad by contradictory instructions was shut down. And that was it. On the other hand 2010 is a film where the conflicts introduced in the story were actually resolved. It was much more of a traditional story and not some lame art project on film. The visual spectacle at the end of 2010 made sense even though the laws of physics at work in the movie were clearly ridiculous. Jupiter is far too small to ignite into a star no matter how much you increase its density. But we will give the filmmakers a pass on that one since the general public doesn't seem to understand that calling Jupiter a failed star is like calling a house a failed Freedom Tower or Burj Khalifa.
![BLACK BAG - Official Trailer [HD] - Only in Theaters March 14](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Du0Xp8WX_7I/mqdefault.jpg)
fantastic 🌹
isn't it weird that the Monolith perfectly encapsulates something modern Homo sapiens have become so accustomed to..the smartphone.
Kubrik & Clarke approached tech companies for futuristic envishionment so it may not be a coincidence
HAL has been my lockscreen for sometime now, also partly due to its dimensions...
I never even noticed that! GREAT catch!
Reading that, I'm surprised no ad agencies in the past thought to use the monolith scene, and have turn around to be the latest model phone.
Amazing job! You spent long enough on each different scene. The flow and pacing were smooth. Loved this!
Thank you. Appreciated!
I enjoyed the missing part of Kubrick's moon ship leaving the space station. Kubrick just cut to the moon ship heading towards the moon. You gave it context. Good job with the details.
Thanks for noticing! 😃
Fantastic video. It just confirms that 2001: A Space Odyssey is has been and will always be THE BEST MOVIE EVER MADE periiod. It will NEVER BE SURPASSED.
Thanks!
2001 will be surpassed, just not by Hollywood. They are creatively bankrupt, and have been for 30 years.
A most magnificently done tribute, it took me back to when I first saw the film in an Edinburgh cinema in the sixties, sitting enthralled in the middle of the main balcony watching the twin-wheeled space station in all its glory, which you have captured so well!
Thanks very much! Happy to have helped bring back good memories!
Beautiful!! Extended the docking & launch of the moon lander sequences , will add to my HAL screensaver now 😊😊😊
Thanks! And, well spotted!😁
So will I.
Thanks. This happens to be my favorite movie, and I enjoyed your tribute.
Thank you!
Terrific! About the best CGI tribute I’ve seen! Beautiful modelling!
Absolutely Astounding!!! One of the very best "tributes" to Kubrick's Iconic film I have yet seen. Phenomenal work!!
Wow! Thank you very much! That means a lot! (Dune next! 🤫)
Amazing and beautiful. You perfectly captured the feeling of each key scene, details timing music. So good! One of my all time favorite films, too. Well done!!
Thanks very much! Glad you liked it, because it took a while! 😆
Imagine how 2001:A Space Odyssey would have turned out had Kubrick had todays technology to draw upon.
Agreed, although surprisingly little has dated that much...
2001: A Space Odyssey could not have been made today due to no African Americans, lesbians or transsexuals. On top of that, white males are not portrayed as evil.
It would be the same! Unless Michael Bay , or JJ Abrams directed then it would be a mess of explosions and space junk and quick cut editing!! Gross!!
The technology would look dated, like it does in 2010
probably not as inspirational, when we show how restrictions can't stop us, that is what inspires people. I think when people watched it for the first time it was like viewing a magic show. "how did they do that?" with every scene. now when I watch a movie I just say, "oh, probably CGI."
I know its a huge step from here, to getting VA's and soundtracks, but it would really good to see more of Clarke's works (and a few others) put out there like this.
The irony could be, if you follow the books close enough, when Hollywood sees that it's popular, it will be hard for them to mess with the story lines, if people can point to RUclips and say, "But here..."
Oops, almost forgot; Brilliant piece of work there.
Thanks very much!
Remarkable! Some of these scenes could have been interchanged with those of the movie! The Discovery sequence was PARTICULARLY well done - and the juxtapositioning of the Monolith and HAL's faceplate was thought-provoking!
Thanks very much! Glad you liked the ending!
That was gorgeous! BRAVO!!!
Thank you!
Greatest movie ever made, period
I love this tribute, its lucid, flowing momentum is mesmirising, the music combined with the visuals is a feast for the senses. 2001 ASO will always remain my most cherished movie experience.
Thank you very much!
stunning!!! truly the greatest science fiction movie of all time and you did such incredible work!!
Thank you very much!
船内連絡通路の床（撮影のドリー）まで完璧に再現してる！ 素晴らしい。
Thank you for noticing! 😄
Excellent work! FYI, the ‘track’ running along the floor to the door of the Parts/Equipment Store at 10:53 isn’t meant to be there. It was to accommodate the film camera.
Thank you! Yes, I knew about the camera dolly track that keir had to carefully step over. I added it because it was in the movie! 😁
@@marcusanimation100 Nice touch, Please excuse my presumption! Have you seen the recent 2001 uploads on the OTOY channel? Check them out. It’s a trailer of sorts and a short documentary on 2001.
@@KiloOneThree Thanks, I'll check it out!
It's truly beautiful.
A masterpiece accompanied musically with another masterpiece. 🙂
😄
OUTSTANDING PIECE OF WORK - Very Well Done.
Thanks very much!
Gorgeous work. Really beautiful.
Thank you!
A beautiful tribute. Great job! Just thinking about the work needed to make the original (models, sets, film processing ...) its amazing how the technology now enables this kind of production by individuals.
Thanks very much, but my 3d is still a long way from the fidelity of detailed physical models. One day! 🤞😁
Cool! I like how you matched the monolith and HAL at the end, which is an association I think Kubrick made on purpose. Though the "my God it's full of stars" isn't at all a Kubrick thing, it's just in the Clarke 2001 universe. I missed seeing the "IBM" nameplate on the flight computer in the Orion III spaceplane cockpit.
Thank you! Glad you liked it! The "stars" line is from the Clarke novel of the movie. So that's why I added it as text.
What a brilliant film,one of my many favourite science fiction films Kubrick is a visionary of film, the same as George Lucas as well,and a brilliant book by Arthur.c.clarke.
yes, thank you! you did a wonderful job. I love 2001, you really showcased the power of computer generated models, and how far they have really come.
2 month ago i decided to finally watch this movie to understand the influence of this film, and now is my favorite sci-fi movies about the space, i liked the another perspective of the "Also Sprach Zarathustra" and the docking and launch of the moon lander sequences, the Discovery one is so well done and magnificent that i can feel Kubrick made it! , my favorite part about this tribute is 12:30 "My god it's full of stars" from the sequel, 2010: The Year We Make Contact (Odyssey Two) (i liked the movie and the book) and how Hal is represented if it was the monolith all of this time and watching how Hal watchs the born of the first Stellar baby, is just inspirational, amazing and beautiful tribute!! :D
Poor Frank, but i liked that too :]
Wow, thank you very much for these comment on my animation. So happy that you noticed and liked all the little details!
This my favorite movie before Star Trek
Star Trek TMP is the best Trek movie...but 2001 is a masterpiece
Incredible work! Thank you for sharing this with us.
Glad you enjoyed it!
At 4:41 - you corrected the “out of sync” vector graphic of the SSV docking station and the Orion as shown in the original - thank you!
Ha ha! My time was well spent after all! Thanks for noticing! I also corrected the rotation direction of the spacestation (exterior shot), and the rotation of the sun (interior shot).
This is beautiful, what a labor of love!
Thanks! Glad you like it!
Wow that's fantastic, a great job, well done. And thankyou so much for sharing it with us all.
Thank you! Glad you like it!
❤😂
Beautifully reimagined. Bravo!
Thank you!
Stupendous work. Well done.
Thanks very much!
A great creation MM's, thanks for transporting us to the world of 2001
My pleasure, Capitan!
I enjoyed this. I do believe I'm eager to see your work in a VR world game on Steam Channel. It would be so cool to sit in the seat of the each craft, space walk over Jupiter. Extract the AE-35 unit.
Nice work.
Thanks, and nice idea!
Very artfully done. A fine tribute.
Thanks!
Really great work!! It will be amazing to do some videos for Rama or/and Childhood End 😍
Thanks! I might wait and see what Denis Villeneuve does with Rama, if he goes ahead!
@@marcusanimation100 How long have we been waiting for Rama now?
Excellent Work!! I would love to see more of your work!!
Thanks! Pls subscribe, I have more anims on the way!
Wonderful work!!! It's simply amazing!!!
Thanks so much!
Nice touch there at the end.
Thanks! I was looking for a new way to wrap it all up!
in actual orbital mechanics, the shuttle would approach from below, then speed up to rise to the height of the station... just fyi
Beautiful work!
Thanks!
2001 was so far ahead of its time, the effects still hold up. its viewed as boring by todays standards but in 1968 it amazed, yes I was an 11yo boy who went to see it. hard to imagine this came out before man landed on the moon
really well done and executed. you used Blender for this? impressive, as a 3D hobby I use Houdini
Yes, blender and davinci resolve. Thanks!
Awesome, phantastic work
Thanks!
Very well done,Marcus😁👍
Thanks very much!
Really enjoyed this, a really good tribute.
Thanks very much!
Ja da werden Erinnerungen wach. Ich wurde echt zum SF-Fan als ich diese Filme damals im Orginal gesehen habe.
日本が映ってる！
Japan is shown!
Nice view of the cockpit of the PanAm shuttle.
Glad to see the scene of the lunar module launching from the station!
The depiction of the earth is a little too crisp,
I would have liked a little fuzzy texture and tint in an analog way.
In the scene where the shuttle enters the square dog of the space station,
It would be best if there was a rear-projection-like depiction of the personnel working inside the station!
Ha ha! Yes! I love Japan, and so I included a view of it!
Thank you for all your thoughts!
Outstanding work, sir.
Thank you, Sir!
великолепный видеоролик. Старая добрая твёрдая научная фантастика. Этого так мало сейчас...
Thanks!
Brilliant, apart from the music used for the Jupiter mission. That should have been the Guyane Ballet Suite
Unfortunately that music is still under copyright restrictions.
Beautiful! And thank you.
Thank you too!
This is fantastic.
Thank you!
Beautiful!
Thankyou!
Beautiful, a perfect tribute
Thank you!
Have you thought of trying to animate things from Clarke's un-adapted Odyssey novels, 2061 and 3001? I'd love to see Mount Zeus and the space elevators.
I'll consider it! Working on an Oblivion tribute at the moment...
Excellent.
Many thanks!
amazing !
Thank you!
SUPER Cool!
SUPER Thanks!
Well done.
.
Thanks!
En 1968, tout ça, c'était des jouets, des maquettes, des transparences et du contreplaqué. C'était Méliès et coûtait des millions de dollars.
Aujourd'hui, cinq garçons font tout cela avec leur carte graphique NVIDIA dans leur chambre.
Very lovely, although the Discovery cockpit is wrong. In the film the crew sat with the window above their heads.
Are you sure you are not thinking of the Aries space shuttle, that travels from the spacestation to the moon? In that, the flight crew sat facing a window in the "top" of the craft.
@@marcusanimation100 Hi Marcus. No. There is a scene in the film, during one of the pod EVAs where we see a crewman (not sure which one. Yellow Spacesuit) sitting in the cockpit facing a large control panel. The windows can be seen above his head. There does seem to be some inconsistency in the sets as the exterior shots do look much like your model. I have a screen shot of the interior but it seems I can't post it here. All the best, Jeff
Wonderful!
Thank you!
Excellent work, despite it ending with a line which isn't in the film. 😏
Best wishes from Vermont ❄️
Thank you. It's a line from Clarke's novel, which is why I included it as text.
A solid B+ .... as your TEXTURE MAPS needed some more randomizing on the Space Station as the 'flopping' was too noticeable on the Orion entrance.
That and the STAR FIELD in the titles were repeated.
Not that it matters, but I worked for Douglas Trumbull in the mid-80's at ShowScan and he'd notice it too.
Otherwise, great work. Keep at it. BRAVO-!
D.A.
Thanks for your input!
How do you decide on the final cut for a video like this?
I have an odd workflow, dropping shots into the editor timeline and shifting them, and adding new shots until it feels complete, or until I am bored and want to animate something else! 😆
A making of part of it should be next.
I wondered how they choose and select this music for this theme
I think modernizing this and other absolute classic science fiction movie takes away the flavour of the movie it’s supposed to gritty,dark and dirty not a sterile fairy tale some movies editing and modernizing does it justice some don’t 2001 ain’t about a pristine pretty paradise!
Really good.
Thanks!
WOW!
*GREAT VIDEO!*
Also: Subbed...👍
THANKS! 😀
@@marcusanimation100>>> You're Welcome.
Excellent animation paying tribute to one of my favorite movies! What software did you use?
Thank you! I used Blender and Davinci Resolve.
BRAVO! ❤❤❤
Thanks!
great job
Thanks!
FOV must be more narrow. And camera must be more far for fov compensation. Then space-station will seem more big and not like a toy.
Feels somewhat incomplete but good work!
Well, I wasn't going to model and render the full 2 1/2 hours! 😁
This spoke Zarathustra.
They should have shown engine exhaust from the Moon Lander in the animation, I know they could have.
I was torn between "Improving" and keeping to the original...
@@marcusanimation100 the original was done in 1968, I don't think they were satisfied with the pyrotechnics they could have used back then, so they chose to have "invisible" rocket exhaust instead. I have seen some other animations of vehicles landing on the Moon. The intent in 2001 was to make those vehicles as realistic as possible back then, I'm sure if they had the technology then that we have today, they would have chosen to show rocket exhaust and dust being kicked up on the Moon, but they we limited to what they had back then, and they didn't want to stick fire crackers at the ends of their models, because then it would have looked more fake than if they didn't show rocket exhaust at all.
I agree. In this case, I tried to match the original. I did try and fix the space station rotation direction, and sun position in other shots though...
nice!
Thanks, glad you liked it!
The best part is that all the music is public domain
Not all, unfortunately...
@@marcusanimation100 the Ligeti?
@@shaggycan Gayane Ballet Suite
¡Excelente!
Gracias!
At the risk of being run off the internet for suggesting this the ONE CHANGE I would like to see done to _both_ *2OO1: A SPACE ODYSSEY* and *2O1O: THE YEAR WE MAKE CONTACT* -- and I presume it could be done with CGI -- would be to put the _wings_ back on *_Discovery One._*
*_Discovery One_* was nuclear powered, so it would require external heat radiators to manage the waste hea produced by the reactors, just like all other nuclear reactors do. The design for *_Discovery_* originally included them, but they were eventually removed because it was feared 1960s audiences would not understand why _Discovery_ had _wings._
The two projections on the sides of the propulsion module, which remained in the film, eere where the radiators would have been mounted.
I put off taking a pee for 13.39 mins because of this.
🤣🤣 You didn't like the last second?
Discovery would have had to flip and burn at some point. Don't think it was designed to aerobreak like the Leonov.
Forward facing thrusters, maybe?
@marcusanimation100 I imagine they'd have to be as big as the rear ones. But spaceprobes do indeed flip over for orbital insertion burn.
Cassini had to flip over twice because the high gain antenna was used as a shield as it passed through Saturn's ring plane. It then flipped over to fire its engine before flipping again to present its high gain antenna as a shield.
Stanley Kubrick era muy preciso en cuanto a fuentes de luz se refiere,y , al principio de este video se ve la tierra iluminada por algún sol, luego aparece el sol detrás de la tierra. Sí este es un video-tributo , creo que se debió cuidar mucho más ese aspecto.
Yes, I probably had too much light on the Earth before the sun comes into view. However, I had to rotate the scene 90 degrees because the youtube algorithm complained it was a clip from the movie, so I was still fairly close to the original! 😁
@@marcusanimation100 Oh! Gracias por tu tiempo y la explicación, la cuál es muy lógica . ( No sarcasmo ).
Aww man, you made the idea before my friend
Oops! 😁
Beautiful recap. Given the recent developments in ai, the original film and now this recap, eh? Don't know if I buy into HAL's going off of his rails or not, I suspect that HAL's rails bit it a literary hook of some sort. Still, beautify written, acted, and presented. Really liked the film's and now, this recap's emphasis on Newton's Laws of Motion, With rockets? Why only rockets? Why not toss for good measure, or a measure of Huygens' just because you could? ... as in... Y' know, there might be a different solution to some of this, maybe. F=ma=(m*v^2)/r, as in Huygens' equation for uniform circular motion. As in a rock on an end of a string being twirled? Where the rock is the mass, 'm.' Mass moving in a uniform circular motion. Water being pumped through a circular tube of 3" ID at a rate of 3 gallons per second, by a centrifugal pump like those found in fire engines that can pump 600 gallons per minute --- if you think of this circular pipe having a radius of about 10' and if the circular tube is folded roughly along its diameter to about 20 degrees then the equation then can be expressed as F = 2*cos(10 degrees)*[(25^3)/10] = 1.5 short tons, about (if you assume a path of 25' or so, not a full circumference then, sounds like. And other than keeping the water in its liquid state and having enough power to run the cited pump at 25 pounds per (about3 gal) second and the system doesn't spring a leak (maybe self-sealing like fighter plane gas tanks?), I think that it might work. Nothing fancy here, just High School level Physics or Geometry. Best of luck. So if you have a fresh sheet of paper with a circle drawn on it, you can draw little arrow counter clockwise with little squares next to the little arrows, all the way around (that 'right-hand rule' for vector cross products). Fold the sheet along the circle's diameter to about 20 degrees with the drawings on the outside where you can see ‘em, and there you go. A demonstration of how to keep the ‘crossed product’ vectors from canceling each out out? I guess? Then you can get some flexible plastic tubing, a yardstick (that has on it a marked 18" spot for a balance beam and some counter weight masses), an empty 2 liter pop bottle for a water tank, some tape, cardboard to fold into a 20-degree wedge shape, some string to string everything up and 'there you go, again.' Happy tinkering. & y' can talk over any of this to anyone y' want. High School Physics, that sort of thing. I don’t think that either the NSA or the CIA would get too excited.
😵💫
OUTTA SIGHT MMAAAAAN...
Thanks!
AMAZING! Would you share your model of the DISCOVERY ONE ?? Message me.
If the sun is BEHIND the Earth, what is shining on the Earth off to the side and in front of it? Bad form.
It's called artistic license. Neither I, nor Kubrick, wanted an entirely unlit Earth.
@@marcusanimation100 I figured someone would catch that, and here it is. Will have to dig up my copy and see if Kubrick did the same thing...
Daisy ...Daisy....gice ne your answer do...
I'm half-crazy, etc!
Too much arrangement for unnecessary individuality.
Sorry, I don't know what that means.
2001 sucked. It was unwatchable garbage. 2010 was superior in every way.
Did you see it in 1968?
@@pi.actual Do I really look that old in my picture? I'm not even 50 years old yet. 😄 So no I didn't see it in 68. But even if I had this movie would still be lame. The passage of decades doesn't make it any better any more than the passage of decades has made the Star Wars prequels any better (although I will happily concede that they are infinitely better than anything that Disney has put out).
I enjoyed 2001 and 2010, though very different in styles.As 2001 is consistently in best movie lists, I think saying it sucked puts you in a minority. I can see how the pacing and disjointedness would put people off though...
It's not as though we were not critical back in 1968. For instance, with a nuclear powered spacecraft that could make it all the way to Jupiter why did Frank's suit have a stupid rubber hose sticking out the back of the helmet just waiting to get caught on something? But to say it "sucked" and was "unwatchable garbage" is not a credible opinion in my mind.
@@pi.actual Im sorry you think my opinion isnt credible simply because I didnt like a movie that you enjoy? Precisely what isnt credible about it? 2001 had an incredibly vapid ending that served no purpose other than to draw a bunch of drugged up hippies to movie theaters. It was a gimmick to get butts in seats and it has aged very poorly. And like all art project films the story was boring and the ending was nonsensical. Plus nothing was resolved in the film. One guy died the other dude went into the monolith and the computer driven mad by contradictory instructions was shut down. And that was it. On the other hand 2010 is a film where the conflicts introduced in the story were actually resolved. It was much more of a traditional story and not some lame art project on film. The visual spectacle at the end of 2010 made sense even though the laws of physics at work in the movie were clearly ridiculous. Jupiter is far too small to ignite into a star no matter how much you increase its density. But we will give the filmmakers a pass on that one since the general public doesn't seem to understand that calling Jupiter a failed star is like calling a house a failed Freedom Tower or Burj Khalifa.
Gran trabajo... Espectacular!!!!
Muchas Gracias, Señor
9:09 not the ksp music😭😭💀
Copyright issues prevented it...