this film developing/production series has been incredible! you're the only person that's showing this type of in-depth behind-the-scenes content with this level of quality. we really appreciate the work you put into this and for sharing these processes with us
This was a trip. I was watching this while scanning 35mm film I shot this week (still frames, not movie). My scanner is a PrimeFilm XA which scans a whole uncut roll of 35mm, 38 frames in a batch in my case. Watching my little desk scanner struggle with 10000DPI while seeing that 12K scanner was unreal.
They must have hard drives the size of the moon to store all that data. Really interesting, especially the Super 8. I've never seen Super 8 look that good 🙂
We have over 2PB (Petabytes - 2000 Terabytes) of SAN high performance storage - at 12K we can be up to 500MB per frame - >10GB/sec (bytes not bits!) to playback in real time. Standard definition video was approx 1MB per frame. There’s a lot of cloud used for distribution of lower resolution proxy files, but currently not practical to send the majority via the cloud.
@@v2bull I'm assuming you work for the guys in the video then? Really amazing setup you have, and really awesome to see guys like you doing as much if not more to keep film alive than people like us shooting stills. I have to ask though, what kind of specs do you use on the machines for playback or editing of those 12k files? I'm just thinking I've got an iMac with 64GB of RAM and a decent spec but it still chugs editing 4k video, so I can't imagine the monster machines you must have just for playback at 10GB/s, let alone editing or processing those files!
yetanotherbassdude it’s me in the video talking about scanning, Super8 and 65 - for the big stuff typically we create optimised lower res proxies to enable faster editing, review and approval - and then once edit is complete then re-link the EDL to the uncompressed master files which takes a load of crunching but doesn’t have to happen real-time. The main SAN supports an over10GB/sec read/write performance, but to deal with the 12K we will work with a smaller faster SSD based SAN and limit what’s happening on this at any time. 100gE infrastructure with Melanox switches and lots of fibre! Most of the Macs will be connected over T2 or T3 it’s quite a fusion of photochemical and digital technology and we love it!
Amazing to see, and nicely done getting them to show you around and document everything they're doing! I really feel like it's the movie industry that's a huge part of why film isn't dead so it's really awesome to see film in movies is still very much alive and that there's still cutting edge R&D being done even today to build new machines and processes like the 12k scanner or that laser film printer. Awesome stuff!
@@ribsy 100%! I'm just getting into doing my own colour processing after previously only doing black & white, and I'm actually going into ECN2 first rather than C41. Vision 3 stocks just seem to be the only ones that don't have availability issues right now so it seems like a better process to invest in, and that's ultimately down to people like Cinelab supporting film in the movie industry, and to guys like you showing us the process for the home game and demystifying it all too. Also just as an aside, I have to give you a shout out for always being here in the comments and joining in the discussion like this. Really appreciate you taking the time for it, and it's definitely a big part of why I keep coming back for your new videos. Cheers, dude!
Wow thank you ribsy and cinelabs for this tour. It was so incredibly interesting. Just to hear the costs (£600/min)that can be incurred in filming is amazing. At least every film is professionally licked at least once. 😆
Thanks for coming to see us Ribsy, love the video and great to see the Super8 - hope you’re going to enter the next Straight8 competition! Cheers, Adrian
That's really cool! How nice to know that somebody is still manufacturing and processing Eastmancolor ECN2 from Super 8 to 65mm and making rock-steady, hi resolution scans using a classic pin-registered slap gate (as seen on the 1912 Bell and Howell 2709 camera)! On one hand it's like a living museum - I used to process colour motion picture film in similar processing lines in Sydney in the late 70s before moving to laboratory control, flashing and reading the test wedges and correcting processor speeds and printer trims. The processing end of this all felt so familiar! We didn't need scanners - we did all our visual effects with optical printers printing on EK colour intermediate films, B+W hi contrast and rarely B+W separation master positives. The world has moved on and I've been compositing digitally for nearly 30 years now. While digital is definitely the way to go (I do things every day quickly that I would have been unable to do optically) for me digital also came at a price. I used to get to the lab early before our optical rushes came up so I could watch the latest footage from currently shooting Australian feature films. Projected on an ANSI standard screen, these rushes - only 1 generation from the original negative - represented the best image Eastmancolor could offer, and it was utterly superb. The practice down there was to always print one-light rushes, so if the director of photography underexposed or somebody forgot the Wratten 85 filter outdoors, we got to see it even before the editor. I miss seeing my work on the big screen. Months later the lab would screen the answer print complete with colour correction, opticals and fully mixed stereo sound for the staff and it was always a blast. The dupes the audience got to see in the cinemas were slightly degraded bulk release printing. Motion picture printing was an analog process and this is something that is not an issue for digital intermediates. We even restored a couple of major historical Australian feature films on Eastmancolor: 'Jedda' (1954, Gevacolor) and 'For The Term of His Natural Life' (1927, B+W) which required simulating in Eastmancolor the tinting and toning with which this film was originally presented. I would love to see the laboratory negative rolls from something like the 1968 Tony Richardson epic "The Charge of the Light Brigade" scanned to 4k+ in a film lab like this then digitally restored to its original magnificence. So great to hear that film still lives! Thanks for a great video!
@@ribsy It was slow, non-interactive and unforgiving. Many times I blew away 3 hours of my work by mis-printing a frame in the wrong place - there was no Undo! Still, along with process projection, miniatures, matte paintings and so on it was the only way to create visual effects on film. When it worked, it could look incredible and complex opticals sometimes earned cheers in the rushes room. It drove me crazy at times but I loved it.
I love this stuff. It’s so amazing to see the inner workings of a pro lab like this and the same goes with the production of Ilford products. You’ve been smashing it out the park with these. Also, can’t believe how great that super 8 quality is from that lab. I’m tempted to shoot some this summer!
Amazing video! I've always wanted to see how this scale of work gets done. I think it's a real shame that the other end of movies, projection, transitioned to digital when it did. While digital does make things a lot easier (and requires so much less effort to produce an acceptable result), the industry standard that we are only now starting to finally upgrade from is 2k xenon. As mentioned in the video, 35mm can easily produce results in 4k, and for 65mm 12k is the standard. Aside from straight resolution, color reproduction on film does feel very noticeably different (I know, cliche as hell, but it's true!), and particularly on those older xenon based digital projectors, contrast and dynamic range. Even now as we finally start to approach quality parity with 35mm with 4k laser projectors, larger film formats are still king. 70mm is a true treat to run and to watch.
@@ribsy If you don't mind Nolan movies, when Oppenheimer is released next summer, there should be both "traditional" 5 perf 70mm and 15 perf IMAX 70mm prints circulating. If you're lucky enough to be near a theater showing it, it's something I would really take advantage of!
Been a while since I been down to Cinelab but have had all sorts of footage developed by them Super 8, 16mm, Super 16mm and 2-Perf 35 and it always looks phenominal and they are great guys and love showing you around. Got to see someone doing some archive stuff and digitising as well as the lab was really cool. Used to be where they make the for GT40s as well which is kinda cool on its own.
This video is fantastic. Reminds me of the best documentaries we often had on TV in the 90s (and that's a compliment, btw. lol) But this is better, because it's shot in HD.
As an ex photo lab worker and amateur 8mm movie maker, I found this awesome.... Great job of showing the background people involved in the movie making process..
On my opinion, a fascinating lessons I learned looking your video is that technician telling us that super 8, 40 years old cameras, are filming with improved stocks and films being scanned at 4K resolution, then i only can think we are living in the golden age of super 8. Lets forget the word "resurgence of super 8". the 80's were the auge or chilhood of super 8 because cameras became popular, but now is the adulthood, lest talk about the prime of super 8, or ripeness of super 8. Thabks for that putting together that video mate!
Thanks so much for doing this dive into processing and scanning. I had no idea Super 8 was that crisp. Though using a Bolex camera is an experience I've dreamed about.
Having shot, developed, and printed B&W 35mm stills film, it’s amazing to see how gargantuan the scale of motion picture film processing is! Thank you for this peek into the process.
This was really interesting - especially the explanation of scanning and it's relationship over time to various quality/definition available. Thank you for making such great content!
Really cool! I grew up shooting on film but abandoned it like most of humanity. But it never really left me. I can tell an analog vs a digital image, and I am happy that companies like Cinelab are around to continue the great tradition of film. This is a fine documentary, well-made and informative.
wow! this is the most amazing, the most exciting, the most entertaining, the most educational video the ever hit any social media platform! I started my career as a photo developer in Junior high school, and to see this for the first time in my life, and to understand and learn how motion picture is developed, is an absolute privilege. The fact that you were able to videotape a tour of a facility like this is absolutely amazing. You can only develop a higher level of appreciation regardless of whether or not you are involved in this industry. One can only hypothesize the future of this process giving the state of of tomorrow's technology. I just glanced at your page and noticed you have videos spanning back two years, I am definitely subscribing to your channel, and I am absolutely going to watch every video you made. This channel is education at its best. Thank you!
this was awesome! what a treat! im old and im a cinematographer and photographer. yes, I remember the days when NOBODY would run to the camera to see the results. And I actually loaded bolex 16mm wind ups out in the field, in the black bag by hand ha ha. gawd I loved the smell in the developing room. it wasn't the scent of the chemicals, it was knowing magic was happening. Its like when I was a kid and you'd see a special effects film, when I saw those ugly blue screen matte lines, or that projected footage background I got chills, I was watching magic happen. although I wholly embraced the digital age. For what its worth weve come a long way and the offsets of working in digital is soooo worth it. Of course film will always be magic but its such an art form now. I mean it always was though.. we just didnt know we were artists back then. we were just dreamers.
Love this documentary, educational series on film! Thanks so much. Very educational. When I saw how IMAX is 3x width of a 65 shot horizontally with 15 perforations, that really made it make sense, actually seeing the film. Much better than a diagram.
24:32 Scanner is smth doing scanning and scanning (by difinition) is registration dot by dot, or row by row, but not simultanious "area' as camera sensor do. Scanner sensors are just one (per RGB channel) row, but not an area sensor. So this digitizing by camera, or as we see on this footage is not scanning at all, as scanning does not mean digitizing.
Its good to understand, that scanned 12K is much more than bayer 12K. Scanners scan full RGB values, so its 3x12K (that's why it takes 3 exposures with RGB). While digital cameras shoot 1x12K (if they can shoot 12K) and interpolate 2x12K worth of data. This is why scanned film 1080p looks really good, you can go watch something like Fires of Kuwait in youtubes.
All I could think when watching this was how much of a bad day youd have at work if you accidentally exposed someones feature film to light. Great video, really enjoying the behind the scenes stuff you've been doing lately.
When you use a scaffolding to reach the rest of a machine, you know it's serious! Thanks to you both - Eric & CineLab - for this amazing tour! Also, what feature film were they processing?
Great deep dive! I worked in a closed loop scanning environment for stills with the E6 process back in the 90's and this brought a lot of it back! I'd love to work for Cinelab :)
Damn this is awesome! I discovered your channel recently and just subscribed. Learned so much thank you very much! Now I understand somehow better why Imax tickets are kind of expensive ^^' I didn't know 8mm was this tiny I was shocked! So cool!
I have a color negative slide, size 10 * 15 cm. my parents did a photo shoot in a photo salon in 1992, the camera was old (made of wood). The photographer shot them on a color film of such a large size. Now, in 2018, I digitized this slide with a scanner, I saw a very unusual effect of this slide. In the frame, the father is out of focus (he was standing behind) and the mother is in focus, but after I turned the slide over and scanned it again, and got the opposite result, already the mother was out of focus and the father in focus. I came to the conclusion that large slides retain a lot of information about the depth of field that can be selected. I did a Photoshop gluing of the frame scanned from both sides and got both parents in focus!)))
21:32 2.5fps wow its just like VHS-Decode the demodulation & timebase correction take about the same time on standard hardware to produce the full 4fsc 1135x625 frame that's properly corrected.
@@ribsy Yeah I do the documentation for the wiki, you basically copy the RF signal off the tape and bypass hardware processing allowing for beyond broadcast quality level of post control for colour under tape formats (S)VHS, High8, Umatic, BetaMax, BetaCam etc, and the byproduct is you have a 1:1 archival copy of your tape that can be put on more stable media like 100GB M-Disk's.
I'm intrigued by the tricolored scanning process. Really thinking about getting a 16 mil cartridge camera (they run at like 100$ with a fast prime lens) and will have to self load and process if I do because 100£ a roll is insane just for a process/scann as a consumer. Got the bug when buying film from FPP as they really market their movie film well.
So dope! I've always wanted to see how this process was done! How does he not cut himself when he was checking the edges for damage. 😂 I'm not sure how I missed your last few vids!
The way I look at the process of digitising film to get the 'authentic film look' is that you can recreate the film look by applying a LUT to it without all the hassle of chemicals and working in total darkness.You can recreate the film look with pure digital,but you can't reproduce the digital look on film.
Can you imagine processing dailies for Hollywood back in the 30s and 40s? Those big movies sets, all the work, someone opens the door or you do something stupid. A lot of pressure. I think it’s that pressure that makes people embrace digital. It’s idiot proof.
@@ribsy It's quite striking - I watch it on my projector and it was a treat to see the 8mm blow up into full 16:9 while the rest of the (high quality digital) is 2.35:1
Loving these film related company tours! The Ilford one was amazing and this one is great so far as well (haven't finished the video yet)
Glad you are enjoying it!
this film developing/production series has been incredible! you're the only person that's showing this type of in-depth behind-the-scenes content with this level of quality.
we really appreciate the work you put into this and for sharing these processes with us
thanks for watching!
theres a couple on smarter every day too :) kodak stuff and also a small film developer company
This was a trip. I was watching this while scanning 35mm film I shot this week (still frames, not movie). My scanner is a PrimeFilm XA which scans a whole uncut roll of 35mm, 38 frames in a batch in my case. Watching my little desk scanner struggle with 10000DPI while seeing that 12K scanner was unreal.
Haha yea - those high end scanners are something!
They must have hard drives the size of the moon to store all that data. Really interesting, especially the Super 8. I've never seen Super 8 look that good 🙂
Haha I think it’s all on the cloud at this point. But yes - wild file sizes
We have over 2PB (Petabytes - 2000 Terabytes) of SAN high performance storage - at 12K we can be up to 500MB per frame - >10GB/sec (bytes not bits!) to playback in real time. Standard definition video was approx 1MB per frame. There’s a lot of cloud used for distribution of lower resolution proxy files, but currently not practical to send the majority via the cloud.
Digital Cinema also generating ton of data, imaging shooting raw footage at 8k
@@v2bull I'm assuming you work for the guys in the video then? Really amazing setup you have, and really awesome to see guys like you doing as much if not more to keep film alive than people like us shooting stills. I have to ask though, what kind of specs do you use on the machines for playback or editing of those 12k files? I'm just thinking I've got an iMac with 64GB of RAM and a decent spec but it still chugs editing 4k video, so I can't imagine the monster machines you must have just for playback at 10GB/s, let alone editing or processing those files!
yetanotherbassdude it’s me in the video talking about scanning, Super8 and 65 - for the big stuff typically we create optimised lower res proxies to enable faster editing, review and approval - and then once edit is complete then re-link the EDL to the uncompressed master files which takes a load of crunching but doesn’t have to happen real-time. The main SAN supports an over10GB/sec read/write performance, but to deal with the 12K we will work with a smaller faster SSD based SAN and limit what’s happening on this at any time. 100gE infrastructure with Melanox switches and lots of fibre! Most of the Macs will be connected over T2 or T3 it’s quite a fusion of photochemical and digital technology and we love it!
Enjoyed that immensely. Thanks for taking us along. The prices are eye-watering for the casual photographer! Learned a lot.
haha yes the prices are wild - but worth it once in a while
Man, you are outdoing yourself with this kind of content! Great work!
Thanks for watching!
Amazing to see, and nicely done getting them to show you around and document everything they're doing! I really feel like it's the movie industry that's a huge part of why film isn't dead so it's really awesome to see film in movies is still very much alive and that there's still cutting edge R&D being done even today to build new machines and processes like the 12k scanner or that laser film printer. Awesome stuff!
Yea 100% we owe a lot to them - they help keep film alive
@@ribsy 100%! I'm just getting into doing my own colour processing after previously only doing black & white, and I'm actually going into ECN2 first rather than C41. Vision 3 stocks just seem to be the only ones that don't have availability issues right now so it seems like a better process to invest in, and that's ultimately down to people like Cinelab supporting film in the movie industry, and to guys like you showing us the process for the home game and demystifying it all too. Also just as an aside, I have to give you a shout out for always being here in the comments and joining in the discussion like this. Really appreciate you taking the time for it, and it's definitely a big part of why I keep coming back for your new videos. Cheers, dude!
Wow thank you ribsy and cinelabs for this tour. It was so incredibly interesting. Just to hear the costs (£600/min)that can be incurred in filming is amazing. At least every film is professionally licked at least once. 😆
yea the cost for 65mm is nuts!
24х60=🤔/600
Thanks for coming to see us Ribsy, love the video and great to see the Super8 - hope you’re going to enter the next Straight8 competition! Cheers, Adrian
the pleasure was all mine - thanks for having me. and yes - still amazed at the 4k results of the super 8 film
That's really cool!
How nice to know that somebody is still manufacturing and processing Eastmancolor ECN2 from Super 8 to 65mm and making rock-steady, hi resolution scans using a classic pin-registered slap gate (as seen on the 1912 Bell and Howell 2709 camera)! On one hand it's like a living museum - I used to process colour motion picture film in similar processing lines in Sydney in the late 70s before moving to laboratory control, flashing and reading the test wedges and correcting processor speeds and printer trims. The processing end of this all felt so familiar!
We didn't need scanners - we did all our visual effects with optical printers printing on EK colour intermediate films, B+W hi contrast and rarely B+W separation master positives. The world has moved on and I've been compositing digitally for nearly 30 years now. While digital is definitely the way to go (I do things every day quickly that I would have been unable to do optically) for me digital also came at a price. I used to get to the lab early before our optical rushes came up so I could watch the latest footage from currently shooting Australian feature films. Projected on an ANSI standard screen, these rushes - only 1 generation from the original negative - represented the best image Eastmancolor could offer, and it was utterly superb. The practice down there was to always print one-light rushes, so if the director of photography underexposed or somebody forgot the Wratten 85 filter outdoors, we got to see it even before the editor. I miss seeing my work on the big screen.
Months later the lab would screen the answer print complete with colour correction, opticals and fully mixed stereo sound for the staff and it was always a blast. The dupes the audience got to see in the cinemas were slightly degraded bulk release printing. Motion picture printing was an analog process and this is something that is not an issue for digital intermediates. We even restored a couple of major historical Australian feature films on Eastmancolor: 'Jedda' (1954, Gevacolor) and 'For The Term of His Natural Life' (1927, B+W) which required simulating in Eastmancolor the tinting and toning with which this film was originally presented.
I would love to see the laboratory negative rolls from something like the 1968 Tony Richardson epic "The Charge of the Light Brigade" scanned to 4k+ in a film lab like this then digitally restored to its original magnificence. So great to hear that film still lives!
Thanks for a great video!
i can only imagine how tough it was to do vfx with optical printers. how far the tech has come!
@@ribsy It was slow, non-interactive and unforgiving. Many times I blew away 3 hours of my work by mis-printing a frame in the wrong place - there was no Undo! Still, along with process projection, miniatures, matte paintings and so on it was the only way to create visual effects on film. When it worked, it could look incredible and complex opticals sometimes earned cheers in the rushes room. It drove me crazy at times but I loved it.
This is the sharpest super 8 footage I’ve ever seen
yea - i have it in 4k and it looks even better
I love this stuff. It’s so amazing to see the inner workings of a pro lab like this and the same goes with the production of Ilford products. You’ve been smashing it out the park with these. Also, can’t believe how great that super 8 quality is from that lab. I’m tempted to shoot some this summer!
yea the super 8 footage is amazing scanned at high res
Amazing video! I've always wanted to see how this scale of work gets done.
I think it's a real shame that the other end of movies, projection, transitioned to digital when it did. While digital does make things a lot easier (and requires so much less effort to produce an acceptable result), the industry standard that we are only now starting to finally upgrade from is 2k xenon. As mentioned in the video, 35mm can easily produce results in 4k, and for 65mm 12k is the standard. Aside from straight resolution, color reproduction on film does feel very noticeably different (I know, cliche as hell, but it's true!), and particularly on those older xenon based digital projectors, contrast and dynamic range. Even now as we finally start to approach quality parity with 35mm with 4k laser projectors, larger film formats are still king. 70mm is a true treat to run and to watch.
yea id love to see 70mm in a theater
@@ribsy If you don't mind Nolan movies, when Oppenheimer is released next summer, there should be both "traditional" 5 perf 70mm and 15 perf IMAX 70mm prints circulating. If you're lucky enough to be near a theater showing it, it's something I would really take advantage of!
Been a while since I been down to Cinelab but have had all sorts of footage developed by them Super 8, 16mm, Super 16mm and 2-Perf 35 and it always looks phenominal and they are great guys and love showing you around. Got to see someone doing some archive stuff and digitising as well as the lab was really cool. Used to be where they make the for GT40s as well which is kinda cool on its own.
Thanks for the info!
This has to be one of the best suggestions from the algorithm. Who knew developing film could be so interesting!
Thanks for watching
This video is fantastic.
Reminds me of the best documentaries we often had on TV in the 90s (and that's a compliment, btw. lol)
But this is better, because it's shot in HD.
Subbed!
haha i appreciate that!
As an ex photo lab worker and amateur 8mm movie maker, I found this awesome.... Great job of showing the background people involved in the movie making process..
Glad you enjoyed it
Amazing how clean and streamlined the process they have is. Nice work!
yea! cinelab cranks through the film!
On my opinion, a fascinating lessons I learned looking your video is that technician telling us that super 8, 40 years old cameras, are filming with improved stocks and films being scanned at 4K resolution, then i only can think we are living in the golden age of super 8. Lets forget the word "resurgence of super 8". the 80's were the auge or chilhood of super 8 because cameras became popular, but now is the adulthood, lest talk about the prime of super 8, or ripeness of super 8. Thabks for that putting together that video mate!
thanks for watching!
Thanks so much for doing this dive into processing and scanning. I had no idea Super 8 was that crisp. Though using a Bolex camera is an experience I've dreamed about.
Oh yea - super 8 looks great
Thank you folk at Cinelab, that was fascinating.
yea they are great!
Having shot, developed, and printed B&W 35mm stills film, it’s amazing to see how gargantuan the scale of motion picture film processing is! Thank you for this peek into the process.
yea the processing is nuts
Oh my GOSH Ribsy!! These tour/ documentary vids of the industry are seriously a public service! So cool!
thanks for watching
If only a Bolex could show more than someone's shirt, a shaky blip of something that looks like a film gate, & part of an ND filter moving.
what?
This is golden. Thank you for the tour. Enjoy every foot of it …
thanks for watching!
This was really interesting - especially the explanation of scanning and it's relationship over time to various quality/definition available. Thank you for making such great content!
yea scanning is quite interesting
I really appreciate these tours! Keep up the good work! 🙏🏾
Glad you enjoy it
This is a fascinating half hour of goodness, so informative and interesting, need raw 12K now!
glad you enjoyed it. the best i can do is 4k lol
Really cool! I grew up shooting on film but abandoned it like most of humanity. But it never really left me. I can tell an analog vs a digital image, and I am happy that companies like Cinelab are around to continue the great tradition of film. This is a fine documentary, well-made and informative.
There is always time to jump back in!
One of the most entertaining and interesting videos I've seen. Thank you for that. Great job!
yea i enjoyed making it!
wow! this is the most amazing, the most exciting, the most entertaining, the most educational video the ever hit any social media platform! I started my career as a photo developer in Junior high school, and to see this for the first time in my life, and to understand and learn how motion picture is developed, is an absolute privilege. The fact that you were able to videotape a tour of a facility like this is absolutely amazing. You can only develop a higher level of appreciation regardless of whether or not you are involved in this industry. One can only hypothesize the future of this process giving the state of of tomorrow's technology. I just glanced at your page and noticed you have videos spanning back two years, I am definitely subscribing to your channel, and I am absolutely going to watch every video you made. This channel is education at its best. Thank you!
Thanks for watching
INCREDIBLE Quality!! Best Super8 scans i've seen !!
Yea not bad!
this was awesome! what a treat! im old and im a cinematographer and photographer. yes, I remember the days when NOBODY would run to the camera to see the results. And I actually loaded bolex 16mm wind ups out in the field, in the black bag by hand ha ha. gawd I loved the smell in the developing room. it wasn't the scent of the chemicals, it was knowing magic was happening. Its like when I was a kid and you'd see a special effects film, when I saw those ugly blue screen matte lines, or that projected footage background I got chills, I was watching magic happen. although I wholly embraced the digital age. For what its worth weve come a long way and the offsets of working in digital is soooo worth it. Of course film will always be magic but its such an art form now. I mean it always was though.. we just didnt know we were artists back then. we were just dreamers.
Sounds like an incredible time
Love this documentary, educational series on film! Thanks so much. Very educational. When I saw how IMAX is 3x width of a 65 shot horizontally with 15 perforations, that really made it make sense, actually seeing the film. Much better than a diagram.
glad you liked it!
Thank you Ribsy for this wonderful video. Greetings from Poland
cheers!
Oh, wow. Amazing, mate. Thanks for sharing. Really great.
Glad you enjoyed
24:32 Scanner is smth doing scanning and scanning (by difinition) is registration dot by dot, or row by row, but not simultanious "area' as camera sensor do. Scanner sensors are just one (per RGB channel) row, but not an area sensor.
So this digitizing by camera, or as we see on this footage is not scanning at all, as scanning does not mean digitizing.
Its good to understand, that scanned 12K is much more than bayer 12K. Scanners scan full RGB values, so its 3x12K (that's why it takes 3 exposures with RGB). While digital cameras shoot 1x12K (if they can shoot 12K) and interpolate 2x12K worth of data. This is why scanned film 1080p looks really good, you can go watch something like Fires of Kuwait in youtubes.
This is BTW the same reason why film scanners are always far superior to copying your negs with digital cameras.
very interesting!
Wow! I love your videos printing photos but this…love it too! 👏👏👏
Haha glad you like them both
All I could think when watching this was how much of a bad day youd have at work if you accidentally exposed someones feature film to light. Great video, really enjoying the behind the scenes stuff you've been doing lately.
yea me too! scared the crap out of me
Another excellent video, Ribsy! Well done on going the extra mile to bring us this interesting content!
Much appreciated
This was awesome! Nice work Ribsy and nice shirt at the end ;)
Thanks for watching
When you use a scaffolding to reach the rest of a machine, you know it's serious!
Thanks to you both - Eric & CineLab - for this amazing tour!
Also, what feature film were they processing?
haha yes indeed! and i don't know what film -- its a secret
Amazing video! It's very interesting these "background" videos because never though the process is made this way. Thank you!
Yea it’s cool to see
Great content as always! Me being a total noob about films it's really nice to have a glance of what's happening behind the scenes. Gracias mano.
Haha yea man. We all learned something here!
Great deep dive! I worked in a closed loop scanning environment for stills with the E6 process back in the 90's and this brought a lot of it back! I'd love to work for Cinelab :)
Oh yea - check their site maybe they have job openings!
Love this content. So interesting to see BTS how this technology works on commercial scale 🙏👍
Yea exactly. So impressive at this scale
Thank you!!!! This is so sick to see : ) I love these "behind the curtain" looks - really appreciate the effort
yea thanks for watching
28:00 I sow Davinci Resolve runing at background. Thanks for sharing this type of content and waiting for more !!!
Yea that’s what the pros use!
This is amazing work. Thanks for getting these and putting them together. Appreciate it
Thanks for watching 😀
Good job!
Thanks ☺️
Absolutely fantastic...bravo!
thanks
Back at it with another tour!!
Yea and there will be more 😀
Film is on of the most beautiful inventions ever. Looks far more beatiful than digital. Scanning Film is totally okey, it preserves the look
Film lives!
Thanks for sharing this man. Grettings from Brazil!
Thanks for watching
An incredible video. Brilliant stuff. Thank you.
Thanks for watching
Jackpot Ribsy! Outstanding.
Thanks for watching
Damn this is awesome! I discovered your channel recently and just subscribed. Learned so much thank you very much! Now I understand somehow better why Imax tickets are kind of expensive ^^' I didn't know 8mm was this tiny I was shocked! So cool!
welcome aboard!
Similar process is used in high-end music recording. The analog tape, once used throughout production, is now a temporary step.
interesting
wow that super 8 footage looks insane!
Yea the scan is everything
this was so good to see!!! very informative
Glad you enjoyed it!
Oddly, this makes me appreciate the Nikon slide scanner (with its digital negative file format NEF) landed to me...
haha yes indeed
I have a color negative slide, size 10 * 15 cm. my parents did a photo shoot in a photo salon in 1992, the camera was old (made of wood). The photographer shot them on a color film of such a large size. Now, in 2018, I digitized this slide with a scanner, I saw a very unusual effect of this slide. In the frame, the father is out of focus (he was standing behind) and the mother is in focus, but after I turned the slide over and scanned it again, and got the opposite result, already the mother was out of focus and the father in focus. I came to the conclusion that large slides retain a lot of information about the depth of field that can be selected. I did a Photoshop gluing of the frame scanned from both sides and got both parents in focus!)))
Yea better scanning tech means better digital photos
This was absolutely fascinating.. Thank you
Glad you enjoyed
This was extremely interesting, thanks for sharing.
Glad you liked it
great content. very informative. keep up the good work.
thanks for watching
Awesome video! however, I noticed some low bitrate issues throughout the video and especially at 11:14
All good
Awesome video nice👌good job
thanks for watching!
Nice work, I enjoyed this one a lot.
thanks!
Excellent a video about 35mm to 12K
Thanks for watching!
Well done Ribs! Fantastic video!
Thanks for watching!
just dazzling! thanxx
def a trip!
Thanks. A fascinating insight. Any more like this and the Ilford one in the pipeline?
definitely more on the way
Genial vídeo! Una maravilla tanto este como el de la fábrica de Ilford. Enhorabuena!
Gracias!
thank you so much ribsy! very interesting
Glad you think so
21:32 2.5fps wow its just like VHS-Decode the demodulation & timebase correction take about the same time on standard hardware to produce the full 4fsc 1135x625 frame that's properly corrected.
sounds interesting
@@ribsy Yeah I do the documentation for the wiki, you basically copy the RF signal off the tape and bypass hardware processing allowing for beyond broadcast quality level of post control for colour under tape formats (S)VHS, High8, Umatic, BetaMax, BetaCam etc, and the byproduct is you have a 1:1 archival copy of your tape that can be put on more stable media like 100GB M-Disk's.
Absolutely amazing
thanks
Damn this video is amazing! I study motion film and this is just perfect. Thanks so much!
Amazing. Glad it was useful
old school seems just so straight forward..
Haha. I dig it
Absolutely fascinating
It is indeed!
I'm intrigued by the tricolored scanning process. Really thinking about getting a 16 mil cartridge camera (they run at like 100$ with a fast prime lens) and will have to self load and process if I do because 100£ a roll is insane just for a process/scann as a consumer. Got the bug when buying film from FPP as they really market their movie film well.
yea ive been looking for a cheap one as well
I was very surprised you would convert an already digital footage to film.
Yea for the look
That looks like my dream job!
Haha yea it’s pretty cool
So dope! I've always wanted to see how this process was done! How does he not cut himself when he was checking the edges for damage. 😂
I'm not sure how I missed your last few vids!
glad you enjoyed!
Phase One sensor on that 12k scanner? So this basically IS camera scanning :)
Exactly, just more advanced
Exactly, just more advanced
BW sensor 🤔maybe
Great video, great tour, great GI Jane joke.
thanks for watching
How do you avoid static electricity when checking the perforation of the film?
🤷♂️
Where is the sound? I feel like I'm missing most of the goods just not being able to hear the explanations.
the sounds is totally fine other than the loud developing room. Not sure what you mean
The way I look at the process of digitising film to get the 'authentic film look' is that you can recreate the film look by applying a LUT to it without all the hassle of chemicals and working in total darkness.You can recreate the film look with pure digital,but you can't reproduce the digital look on film.
there is no need to create the digital look though. that is the default
Fascinating! Thanks!👍🤙👐
Indeed!
Can you imagine processing dailies for Hollywood back in the 30s and 40s? Those big movies sets, all the work, someone opens the door or you do something stupid. A lot of pressure. I think it’s that pressure that makes people embrace digital. It’s idiot proof.
Yea digital is def more idiot proof. Altho I’m sure some horrible stuff has happened to footage in the past haha
Loved this Ribsy 👏🏻👍🏻
Thanks for watching!
Amazing stuff! Thanks for content!
Thank you
18:35 they charge a 100£ for scanning and processing a cartridge in 4k. Is this right?
That means development and scanning?
Plus shipping to and back.
I think it’s 100 for the whole package. Plus extra for shipping
With the new Super-8 stock it is also important that the lens of the camera delivers a clear image. Otherwist the 4K is for nothing.
Yup
What was that london meet up in the video? Looks fun!
look up analog.meetups on IG
The new monarch TV series has some interesting imax scenes in super 8 that are simulated
Interesting
@@ribsy It's quite striking - I watch it on my projector and it was a treat to see the 8mm blow up into full 16:9 while the rest of the (high quality digital) is 2.35:1
@@RXP91 i gotta give that a shot!
Wouldn't a 4k scan of 8mm be WAY beyond the grain size? I'd like to see a side by side 1080p vs 4k comparison.
You can never get enough K’s haha
For some reason the world is always a nicer, kinder place on Super 8.
Totally agree! 🥹
Of course. Super 8 is super¡😊
really enjoyed this... and i subscribed :)
glad you enjoyed it