Use Discount Code ABHILIVE for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount! Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/dQjABAKNDD Telegram - t.me/lawshala
Tqsm sir for the class. My opinion regarding Sonelal Case is an affirmation with the All HC because this circular is made in the public interest and to secure justice which is the ultimate purpose of judiciary. As far as Lalita Kumari judgment is considered it still holds relevance in offences which are purely criminal in nature that is when there is no other resort available for the wrong so done with the party but in cases which are civil and commercial in nature i.e. where another remedy is available (civil courts and arbitration) then inclination should be made to exhaustion of such remedies first and then filing FIR. But to secure ends of justice Allahabad HC should make such provision for objection raising plea where the party has to show compelling reasons as to why FIR should be filed.And according to facts and circumstances of the case , the court should see the matter.
Sir, in the adjudicate of State of U.P and Sone lal , I agree with Allahabad highcourt as many civil cases are being filed FIR cases just to bring fear in the mind of opposite party and to gain their profit that clearly waste the time of criminal court which can easily be dealt with civil court. I affirm that any dispute that is of civil nature should not be filled with criminal section untill and unless genuine concern is shown in regarding with criminal court.
Nishin Hussain case- No, a woman can't keep a common intention for the offence that she can not commit under IPC or BNS. So, she can't be prosecuted for 354A r/w 34 IPC. For criminal conspiracy- It is a substantive offence in itslf. So, she can be prosecuted here.
Sir,I agree with Allahabad highcourt judgement because many of civil cases filled just for pressuring the opposite party to do so or create fear as my opinion Supreme court should think because many of civil is still pending in our court of law and GENERATION TO GENERATION wise get involved in civil matters,there is no conclusion comes out of our court of law.Its create a waste of time of law.
Sir, Allahabad high court decision might curtail Burden of cases , but this decision can also be use in negative way, first they won't lodge an fir of weak people as usual, 2nd there would be delay occure in lodging an Fir by police , which Would have adverse impact on case & would weaken the case.
Also sir in regard with case of Nirin Hussain , I agree with the point that personally "man" cannot only assault but also women can sexually assault other women.
Sir allahabad high court ka judgment correct hai kyu civil matters m unnecessary criminal trail se jo zaruri mamle h wo delay hote h court party donno ka time waste hota hai...
Ha.. agr koi female koi rape ya harresment jaise offences me involved h.. to but comitt nhi kiya .. Use particularly act wise punishment hogi.. Ye maine kisi case law me pdha tha.. 😊😊
Use Discount Code ABHILIVE for StudyIQ Judiciary Courses at a Maximum discount!
Hurry Enroll Now : studyiq.u9ilnk.me/d/dQjABAKNDD
Telegram - t.me/lawshala
Thanks sir🎉🎉 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Welcome😊
Tqsm sir for the class. My opinion regarding Sonelal Case is an affirmation with the All HC because this circular is made in the public interest and to secure justice which is the ultimate purpose of judiciary. As far as Lalita Kumari judgment is considered it still holds relevance in offences which are purely criminal in nature that is when there is no other resort available for the wrong so done with the party but in cases which are civil and commercial in nature i.e. where another remedy is available (civil courts and arbitration) then inclination should be made to exhaustion of such remedies first and then filing FIR. But to secure ends of justice Allahabad HC should make such provision for objection raising plea where the party has to show compelling reasons as to why FIR should be filed.And according to facts and circumstances of the case , the court should see the matter.
Sir, in the adjudicate of State of U.P and Sone lal , I agree with Allahabad highcourt as many civil cases are being filed FIR cases just to bring fear in the mind of opposite party and to gain their profit that clearly waste the time of criminal court which can easily be dealt with civil court. I affirm that any dispute that is of civil nature should not be filled with criminal section untill and unless genuine concern is shown in regarding with criminal court.
I hopw the SC understands that too 😊
Thank you sir 🙏
Nishin Hussain case-
No, a woman can't keep a common intention for the offence that she can not commit under IPC or BNS. So, she can't be prosecuted for 354A r/w 34 IPC.
For criminal conspiracy- It is a substantive offence in itslf. So, she can be prosecuted here.
Right. Thank you for the response. 😊
Sir,I agree with Allahabad highcourt judgement because many of civil cases filled just for pressuring the opposite party to do so or create fear as my opinion Supreme court should think because many of civil is still pending in our court of law and GENERATION TO GENERATION wise get involved in civil matters,there is no conclusion comes out of our court of law.Its create a waste of time of law.
Lets hope for the best from SC
Sir please sir aap public and private international law padha dijiye,,
yes sir plz
Yes sir plzzz
Sir, Allahabad high court decision might curtail Burden of cases , but this decision can also be use in negative way, first they won't lodge an fir of weak people as usual, 2nd there would be delay occure in lodging an Fir by police , which Would have adverse impact on case & would weaken the case.
Thankyou so much sir ❤😊
Welcome
थैंक्स सर
Welcome😊
Also sir in regard with case of Nirin Hussain , I agree with the point that personally "man" cannot only assault but also women can sexually assault other women.
34 ipc and 120B ipc mei women is booked ..
Yes law needs to be changed
well explained..
Thank you 😊
Sir allahabad high court ka judgment correct hai kyu civil matters m unnecessary criminal trail se jo zaruri mamle h wo delay hote h court party donno ka time waste hota hai...
Haan I agree. SC dekho kya karta hai
सर इस तरह के निर्देश सही है पर ये सवाल, फॉलो करने वाले और फॉलो करने वाले की नियत हमारी ईमानदारी पर निर्भर करेगी..
Yes I agree
Sir news 4 me ek mahila 354a ka crime nhi kr sakti but us crime ko abet to kr sakti hai to uski saja to usko milegi ??
Ha.. agr koi female koi rape ya harresment jaise offences me involved h.. to but comitt nhi kiya ..
Use particularly act wise punishment hogi..
Ye maine kisi case law me pdha tha.. 😊😊
Abetment to hona chahiye
@@Halfpace ji sir