I've had mine a little over 5 years. I noticed the fit was sloppy right out of the box. The weather seal twisted up on it right before Christmas so I sent it to New Jersey to repair it. They put a new mount on it and tightened everything up. The fit is still sloppy but the auto-focus is as fast if not faster than when it was new. They do need to come out with a MKII version though. Thanks for the video and all your videos. I've learned a ton from you!
Before moving to the Nikon mirrorless system this was one of my landscape lenses for 5 years and when I sold it it was just as good as when I first bought it. There was never any wobble at the lens mount, the focus was good, weather sealing was top notch. I shot in the pouring rain countless times, in sub zero and hot humid tropical conditions and the lens performed great. Fujifilms autofocus is not as reliable as my Nikon kit but it was good enough.
I know you've mentioned probably buying a new one but I'd definitely say it's worth getting a quote for servicing from Fujifilm, I had my 100-400 repaired/serviced by Fujifilm after a monopod failure and it didn't break the bank. The loose mount... both my 50-140mm and 100-400mm have done that from day one of owning them.
This lens is the first one I bought when I switched to Fuji (I bought it used). I absolutely love it for landscapes. It’s heavy for me but every single time I use it I’m happy. I’m constantly shocked by the quality and stability of the video (paired with x-t4) 😄 Such a good lens so far!
I’ve had this lens for awhile and it’s definitely a BEAST AND EXTREMELY SHARP however I’ve never used a 50-140 as a landscape lens maybe I should because is much sharper than my 55-200. Yes I too own a Viltrox 85mm and for the price and quality is good enough for me. Great blog Aloha 🙏
Many thanks, I think the 50-140 lacks a bit of reach for landscapes and is also quite a bit heavier than the 55-200. I guess its just a case of weighing up whether the extra little bit of sharpness is worth the trade off 👍
As others have mentioned, maybe sending it in for a tune up is the way to go. Doesn't sound like anything they couldn't fix relatively inexpensively. It sounds like it's a good sharp copy so worth the investment to keep it going for sure! I use the 55-200 for my landscape stuff due to the size and weight. It does the job, but I would have the lens you got if I still shot weddings. Thanks for the video!
Hi Ian, Great video. You should send the 50-140 lens back to Fujifilm for servicing. You cannot necessarily expect it to be maintenance free for five years! However, I would also purchase the excellent and affordable 55-200mm for landscape work. I have one and love it! It is sharp, flexible and lightweight and you don't need the fast aperture for landscapes.
I send my body 1 time a year to service! Lenses every 2 years! Lenses and body are send with order to check if they harmonize together! In mirrorless days not so important but still use my d750 and there it is a a question!
Thanks for your candid review. Loved the choice of angle and long exposure on church rock. Have always loved minimalist images and this was a great variety.
Five year ownership too, although not as heavily used as yours. Had lens mount issues within 6 months with my first example; rotating between landscape and portrait would cause the camera to turn on and off with a clunk sound to the stabilisation. With the warranty replaced lens focus acquisition issues began after 18 months. The quality it delivers still outweighs the frustrations although the stubbornly awkward and sticking lens hood tests my patience 😅
Hi Ian it was interesting to hear the issues that you've been having with this lens I have also had issues regarding the play at the Mount and AF hunting etc. To be honest since buying the excellent 70-300mm the 50-140mm has been left on the shelf at home. I really love that lens as it's got great reach especially with the 1.4x convertor and is half the weight of the 50-140mm. I have considered selling the 50-140mm but still think that's the best lens for fast moving sports photography
Hi Ian. This raises, by implication at least, an important point. A lot of attention is directed at camera performance and whilst lenses get reviewed there rarely seems to be a broader assessment of the range and quality of glass for each system. I've recently bought a Sony A7R IV (used in very good condition) for the big sensor and the ability to crop aggressively. Coming from Fuji I have been pleased by the range of glass on offer from Sony and third party manufacturers. This has made me think that rather that buying into a system because of the cameras the first port of call really needs to concentrate on glass. It would be interesting to gather data on lens build quality in the real world rather than at the time of review. Potential longevity would be a good metric. Anyway my thoughts. Enjoyable interesting vid. 👍
Thanks Kane, very true. Build quality can only be assessed after a period of time, which is why I shared my experience, hopefully it will give others an idea of what to expect 👍👍
Just a thought Ian, have you tried cleaning the contacts on the lens? after all those shoots they must have become dirty and would benefit from a clean?
Should I or shalt I ? Enjoyed the video its come at the right time.Thought about adding this to my kitbag Ian, as I don't currently own a telephoto zoom and being new to the Fujifilm system,, but having second thoughts.
Thanks for this, I just wonder can you get it refurbished ? I have this lens now for 2 years have used probably quarter of what you have and its still in very good condition mainly landscape but I’m very fond of it.
I’m not sure if the linear motors are brush or brushless. You could always have Fujifilm inspect it. If it has brushes, they are most likely worn after so much use. Just need to be replaced if that’s the case.
When I went to buy lenses outside of the 'kit lens' 18-55mm that came with my XT-3 I had to make choice due to cost. I wanted the 50-140 and the 16f1.4...but both were out of my budget. I got the 16f1.4 and the 55-200 (instead of the 50-140). I still kinda drool over the 50-140. It's definitely sharper than the 55-200 and I like the f2.8 throughout the range. I still have the 3 lenses, it's been 4 years now. I dunno if I will ever have the 50-140. The sloppy mount has me worried... I want the (don't laugh) 90mmf/2 macro now..Thx Ian!
Hello, and thank you for the woderfull review. I do have one question, did you try to service the lens with fuji? Maybe 1-200$ will bring a lot of life in that lens.
@@ian_worth Thanks for the reply, i can't wait to see it 🙂
2 года назад
Hi Ian, I am sorry for your problems with your lens. I hope you'll fix it with fuji services. And I liked your shoot! I also would like to ask a question as a new user. I just bought this lens and there is a hummıng noise on lens when OIS ıs ON or OFF, is this normal? Have you ever been experienced this?
I’ve often wondered if the o-ring on the lens mount had something to do with the loose fit over time. My 100-400 has definitely become loose over the years. Interesting you mention the Viltrox. All my Viltrox lenses fit very tightly on my Fuji cameras.
I was considering selling my XF 50-140mm a couple of weeks ago when an incident involving a tripod and playing fetch in the house with my dog resulted in the lens crashing onto a hard floor with an X-T5 attached to the other end. To my surprise, the only damage that resulted was a severe bend to the filter ring and some minor deformation of the ring behind that. It still focuses perfectly. It's a great lens all around but my plan was to sell the 50-140mm and buy the Sigma 100-400mm. I guess I'm going to have to make due until I pony up the money to have it fixed but I'll never leave a camera sitting on a tripod in the house again.
Hi Jan. Thanks for your work. I would like to know if there is a rigging part that can be assembled directly on your cage (Smallrig), under the lens and junction, that can support the lens near the camera, preventing what you mentioned. Great video.
I'll just point out that my heavier lenses (50-140 / 150-600) jiggle/move a bit on the mount and both are in excellent / like new shape. I don't notice a jiggle when shooting, and certainly they don't malfunction or stop working. Some play might be normal, in other words. My 23mm in contrast is locked on tight and doesn't budge. I assume you have never dropped the lens, but maybe the rails / AF motors need a service. Otherwise it sounds like the lens is functioning normally. You didn't note any dust / fungus / haze in the barrel, so it sounds like that aspect held up great as well. Obviously, it would be great if these things just worked forever - but moving parts are always going to cause issues sooner or later.
I’ve own the lens but not used much other than sporting events. I Owned the Canon 70-200 for many years and used much more than I’ve used Fujifilm 50-140 lens. This type of lens is really a must have lessons for indoor sports like basketball also useful for football when you’re in the end zone, it would be totally unacceptable for the focusing ability of this lens to deteriorate with time
Have you considered sending in for repair? I wonder how expensive that would be? I love mine, but I don't use it as often as a pro would. What lens foot brand are you using. Mine Fujifilm one is too small is too small.
Absolutely mate, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍 I think its a sunwayfoto arca swiss mount 👍
Did you have the play between the camerabody and lens from the beginning, bought one of these used and there is as you describe in the video some play which I never noticed on any other lens. The play dont affect iq which is stellar, its quite discomforting though.
You should consider to have a repair by Fuji. I had good experience with their service. They charged me always below 100€ and what I got back was always like a new lense. You need some patience since the lense would be away for some weeks. But in the end I think that this a far better option than buying a new or different one....
Hey there! Sorry to hear that you got issues with your copy off the lens. That does not seem to happen with all copies though. I bought my version from a wedding photographer that also used it for years. And I abused myself for a year now, and it is still like new. I have good experiences with the support of Fuji. Maybe you can ask them for support. It sounds like things they could fix.
The play on the lens mount could be the cause of the auto focus issues as the lens is not communicating with the camera. I had the 55-200 which was alright, when I shot Fujifilm. It cost £138.00 to repair my 18-55mm kit lens when I traded it in to go to Nikon Z mount, because the lens had fungus. I thought I had taken every precaution with it as I knew there was no weather sealing. Things are not always what they seem for a Pro grade lens then it should have pro grade build quality. Send it back to Fujifilm.
Question; did your lens mount ever come loose, and the screws loosen up? Mine kept loosening up, then finaly came out. Now it's into Fuji Repair, NJ, and it's going to be $ 400 to repair. I love the sharpness of the lens, but after 18 months, of not using it heavily, the loose mount thing was driving me crazy. Then it fell apart.
@@ian_worth It would be interesting to hear what you have to say about said service etc. I may share this Vlog with a friend who uses the same lens and see what she has to say about it, more so as she is an Ambassador for Fuji and the last thing she needs is a lens going tits up in Nepal or even a portrait shoot in the UK.
Disappointing build quality given its professional status. I did have a Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 mkii fail after a similar time frame and usage and while I did have it repaired (at a fairly high cost) it never was quite the same. My relatively new Canon RF 70-200 f/2.8 also has some hiccups so perhaps it’s not an unusual situation given the complexity of design and electronics in today’s lenses. BTW, my Mamiya RB67 is working beautifully.
Had the lens and its great but far too heavy in the bag (chronic bad back so every ounce counts) so sold it and bought the 70-300. I miss 2.8 but happy with the decision and the extra reach. but if I shot portraits weddings etc would have definitely kept it.
I waited a long time for the video about the lens. I use the xf55-200 in landscape photography, otherwise I use the same lenses as you. I'm thinking about switching to the 50-140 because of the 2.8 aperture. But your problems after 5 years, even with frequent use, must not be. I would contact fuji. maybe something can be done there. Greetings from germany
I'd be interested in a more compact 50-140 f4-5.6. Something that would be really small for travel. The telephoto zooms are just as big as full frame and I choose to shoot telephoto bright light work with Micro Four Thirsds. For low light I use my primes on Fuji (Viltrox 85mm f1.8 and Fuji 50mm f2).
Don't miss a video - Sign up for my free newsletter to be notified when I next upload - www.iworthphotos.com/take-action
I've had mine a little over 5 years. I noticed the fit was sloppy right out of the box. The weather seal twisted up on it right before Christmas so I sent it to New Jersey to repair it. They put a new mount on it and tightened everything up. The fit is still sloppy but the auto-focus is as fast if not faster than when it was new. They do need to come out with a MKII version though. Thanks for the video and all your videos. I've learned a ton from you!
Thanks Joe, very interesting mate 👍👍
How much did you pay for that repair joe?
Before moving to the Nikon mirrorless system this was one of my landscape lenses for 5 years and when I sold it it was just as good as when I first bought it. There was never any wobble at the lens mount, the focus was good, weather sealing was top notch. I shot in the pouring rain countless times, in sub zero and hot humid tropical conditions and the lens performed great. Fujifilms autofocus is not as reliable as my Nikon kit but it was good enough.
Very interesting and good to hear 👍👍
I know you've mentioned probably buying a new one but I'd definitely say it's worth getting a quote for servicing from Fujifilm, I had my 100-400 repaired/serviced by Fujifilm after a monopod failure and it didn't break the bank. The loose mount... both my 50-140mm and 100-400mm have done that from day one of owning them.
Absolutely mate, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
This lens is the first one I bought when I switched to Fuji (I bought it used). I absolutely love it for landscapes. It’s heavy for me but every single time I use it I’m happy. I’m constantly shocked by the quality and stability of the video (paired with x-t4) 😄 Such a good lens so far!
Its definitely a great lens Sarah, no doubt 👍👍
hi, is there any hummıng noise on your lens when OIS ıs ON or OFF?
I’ve had this lens for awhile and it’s definitely a BEAST AND EXTREMELY SHARP however I’ve never used a 50-140 as a landscape lens maybe I should because is much sharper than my 55-200. Yes I too own a Viltrox 85mm and for the price and quality is good enough for me. Great blog Aloha 🙏
Many thanks, I think the 50-140 lacks a bit of reach for landscapes and is also quite a bit heavier than the 55-200. I guess its just a case of weighing up whether the extra little bit of sharpness is worth the trade off 👍
As others have mentioned, maybe sending it in for a tune up is the way to go. Doesn't sound like anything they couldn't fix relatively inexpensively. It sounds like it's a good sharp copy so worth the investment to keep it going for sure! I use the 55-200 for my landscape stuff due to the size and weight. It does the job, but I would have the lens you got if I still shot weddings. Thanks for the video!
Absolutely Edward, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
Hi Ian, Great video. You should send the 50-140 lens back to Fujifilm for servicing. You cannot necessarily expect it to be maintenance free for five years! However, I would also purchase the excellent and affordable 55-200mm for landscape work. I have one and love it! It is sharp, flexible and lightweight and you don't need the fast aperture for landscapes.
Absolutely mate, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
I send my body 1 time a year to service! Lenses every 2 years! Lenses and body are send with order to check if they harmonize together! In mirrorless days not so important but still use my d750 and there it is a a question!
Thanks for your candid review. Loved the choice of angle and long exposure on church rock. Have always loved minimalist images and this was a great variety.
Many thanks 👍🙏
Love your vid's, keep em coming! Re the 50-140, given the use you have had from it, surely its due a service then good to go for another few years?
Absolutely David, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
It’s about time Fuji update this lens with mk II version.
Yeah, would be nice to see a mk2 👍👍
2 years later and everyone is still waiting on lens updates... crazy.
Five year ownership too, although not as heavily used as yours. Had lens mount issues within 6 months with my first example; rotating between landscape and portrait would cause the camera to turn on and off with a clunk sound to the stabilisation. With the warranty replaced lens focus acquisition issues began after 18 months. The quality it delivers still outweighs the frustrations although the stubbornly awkward and sticking lens hood tests my patience 😅
Hi Ian it was interesting to hear the issues that you've been having with this lens I have also had issues regarding the play at the Mount and AF hunting etc. To be honest since buying the excellent 70-300mm the 50-140mm has been left on the shelf at home. I really love that lens as it's got great reach especially with the 1.4x convertor and is half the weight of the 50-140mm. I have considered selling the 50-140mm but still think that's the best lens for fast moving sports photography
Thanks Paul 😊👍
Hi Ian. This raises, by implication at least, an important point. A lot of attention is directed at camera performance and whilst lenses get reviewed there rarely seems to be a broader assessment of the range and quality of glass for each system.
I've recently bought a Sony A7R IV (used in very good condition) for the big sensor and the ability to crop aggressively.
Coming from Fuji I have been pleased by the range of glass on offer from Sony and third party manufacturers.
This has made me think that rather that buying into a system because of the cameras the first port of call really needs to concentrate on glass. It would be interesting to gather data on lens build quality in the real world rather than at the time of review. Potential longevity would be a good metric.
Anyway my thoughts. Enjoyable interesting vid. 👍
Thanks Kane, very true. Build quality can only be assessed after a period of time, which is why I shared my experience, hopefully it will give others an idea of what to expect 👍👍
Just a thought Ian, have you tried cleaning the contacts on the lens? after all those shoots they must have become dirty and would benefit from a clean?
Hi Dan, yes I strip all of my gear down and give it all a good clean every winter, 👍👍
Should I or shalt I ? Enjoyed the video its come at the right time.Thought about adding this to my kitbag Ian, as I don't currently own a telephoto zoom and being new to the Fujifilm system,, but having second thoughts.
Its a great lens Paul, just a shame it wasn't as durable as I'd hoped. Maybe the build quality has improved, after all, mine was built 5 years ago 👍
Thanks for this, I just wonder can you get it refurbished ? I have this lens now for 2 years have used probably quarter of what you have and its still in very good condition mainly landscape but I’m very fond of it.
Absolutely David, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
Very useful information as I'm looking into buying this model in used condition.
I’m not sure if the linear motors are brush or brushless. You could always have Fujifilm inspect it. If it has brushes, they are most likely worn after so much use. Just need to be replaced if that’s the case.
Yeah, I'm kind of thinking if it needs a new mount, a service and new motors, it will probably be worth me saving up and buying a new one 👍
When I went to buy lenses outside of the 'kit lens' 18-55mm that came with my XT-3 I had to make choice due to cost. I wanted the 50-140 and the 16f1.4...but both were out of my budget. I got the 16f1.4 and the 55-200 (instead of the 50-140). I still kinda drool over the 50-140. It's definitely sharper than the 55-200 and I like the f2.8 throughout the range. I still have the 3 lenses, it's been 4 years now. I dunno if I will ever have the 50-140. The sloppy mount has me worried... I want the (don't laugh) 90mmf/2 macro now..Thx Ian!
You want the 80mm f2.8 macro ! The 90mm f2 is not macro ! I have the 80mm it is fenomenaal !! Also for portret ! Sharpest Fuji lens !
Hello, and thank you for the woderfull review. I do have one question, did you try to service the lens with fuji? Maybe 1-200$ will bring a lot of life in that lens.
yep, had it serviced 👍I'm going to talk about that in a future video 👍👍
@@ian_worth Thanks for the reply, i can't wait to see it 🙂
Hi Ian, I am sorry for your problems with your lens. I hope you'll fix it with fuji services. And I liked your shoot! I also would like to ask a question as a new user. I just bought this lens and there is a hummıng noise on lens when OIS ıs ON or OFF, is this normal? Have you ever been experienced this?
Five years of professional use I'd say most lenses would be due a service, that's probably all it needs.
Yeah, I'm kind of thinking if it needs a new mount, a service and new motors, it will probably be worth me saving up and buying a new one 👍
is the optical quality in this lens much better than the xf70-300 for landscape? thanks for video :-D
Video coming soon 👍👍
Thanks Ian, like the shot.
Awesome Rodg 👍👍😊
I’ve often wondered if the o-ring on the lens mount had something to do with the loose fit over time. My 100-400 has definitely become loose over the years. Interesting you mention the Viltrox. All my Viltrox lenses fit very tightly on my Fuji cameras.
I was considering selling my XF 50-140mm a couple of weeks ago when an incident involving a tripod and playing fetch in the house with my dog resulted in the lens crashing onto a hard floor with an X-T5 attached to the other end. To my surprise, the only damage that resulted was a severe bend to the filter ring and some minor deformation of the ring behind that. It still focuses perfectly. It's a great lens all around but my plan was to sell the 50-140mm and buy the Sigma 100-400mm. I guess I'm going to have to make due until I pony up the money to have it fixed but I'll never leave a camera sitting on a tripod in the house again.
Hi Jan. Thanks for your work. I would like to know if there is a rigging part that can be assembled directly on your cage (Smallrig), under the lens and junction, that can support the lens near the camera, preventing what you mentioned. Great video.
I'll just point out that my heavier lenses (50-140 / 150-600) jiggle/move a bit on the mount and both are in excellent / like new shape. I don't notice a jiggle when shooting, and certainly they don't malfunction or stop working. Some play might be normal, in other words. My 23mm in contrast is locked on tight and doesn't budge. I assume you have never dropped the lens, but maybe the rails / AF motors need a service. Otherwise it sounds like the lens is functioning normally. You didn't note any dust / fungus / haze in the barrel, so it sounds like that aspect held up great as well. Obviously, it would be great if these things just worked forever - but moving parts are always going to cause issues sooner or later.
I’ve own the lens but not used much other than sporting events. I Owned the Canon 70-200 for many years and used much more than I’ve used Fujifilm 50-140 lens. This type of lens is really a must have lessons for indoor sports like basketball also useful for football when you’re in the end zone, it would be totally unacceptable for the focusing ability of this lens to deteriorate with time
Beast of a lens. I shot one of my best seascapes with this lens. The one thing that would make it better is an acra swiss foot
Cheers for watching buddy 🙏👍
Just put an Arca plate on the foot.
I have trouble with my lens choice. I am looking for best video quality for handheld usage. Here is my choices 18-120, 50-140, 70-300
Have you considered sending in for repair? I wonder how expensive that would be? I love mine, but I don't use it as often as a pro would. What lens foot brand are you using. Mine Fujifilm one is too small is too small.
Absolutely mate, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍 I think its a sunwayfoto arca swiss mount 👍
Did you have the play between the camerabody and lens from the beginning, bought one of these used and there is as you describe in the video some play which I never noticed on any other lens. The play dont affect iq which is stellar, its quite discomforting though.
I don't think it was as tight as other Fuji lenses, but it has got looser over time 👍👍
You should consider to have a repair by Fuji. I had good experience with their service. They charged me always below 100€ and what I got back was always like a new lense. You need some patience since the lense would be away for some weeks. But in the end I think that this a far better option than buying a new or different one....
Thanks Andreas, I may well send it in for a service but just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
Hey there! Sorry to hear that you got issues with your copy off the lens. That does not seem to happen with all copies though. I bought my version from a wedding photographer that also used it for years. And I abused myself for a year now, and it is still like new. I have good experiences with the support of Fuji. Maybe you can ask them for support. It sounds like things they could fix.
Cheers Jaap, yes could just be my copy, or maybe I'm too heavy handed with it 👍
What backpack are you using, is that the Lowepro Vertrex 300? Would you recommended it?
The play on the lens mount could be the cause of the auto focus issues as the lens is not communicating with the camera. I had the 55-200 which was alright, when I shot Fujifilm. It cost £138.00 to repair my 18-55mm kit lens when I traded it in to go to Nikon Z mount, because the lens had fungus. I thought I had taken every precaution with it as I knew there was no weather sealing. Things are not always what they seem for a Pro grade lens then it should have pro grade build quality. Send it back to Fujifilm.
Thanks Nicky, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
Question; did your lens mount ever come loose, and the screws loosen up? Mine kept loosening up, then finaly came out. Now it's into Fuji Repair, NJ, and it's going to be $ 400 to repair. I love the sharpness of the lens, but after 18 months, of not using it heavily, the loose mount thing was driving me crazy. Then it fell apart.
Have you ever thought of sending it back to Fuji for a service and sorting the focus out?
Absolutely mate, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
@@ian_worth It would be interesting to hear what you have to say about said service etc. I may share this Vlog with a friend who uses the same lens and see what she has to say about it, more so as she is an Ambassador for Fuji and the last thing she needs is a lens going tits up in Nepal or even a portrait shoot in the UK.
Disappointing build quality given its professional status. I did have a Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 mkii fail after a similar time frame and usage and while I did have it repaired (at a fairly high cost) it never was quite the same. My relatively new Canon RF 70-200 f/2.8 also has some hiccups so perhaps it’s not an unusual situation given the complexity of design and electronics in today’s lenses. BTW, my Mamiya RB67 is working beautifully.
Cheers for info re: canon, very interesting 👍👍
Thumbs up Ian 👍👍
Thanks 👍
Loved the photo.
Thanks Paulus 🙏🙏
Had the lens and its great but far too heavy in the bag (chronic bad back so every ounce counts) so sold it and bought the 70-300. I miss 2.8 but happy with the decision and the extra reach. but if I shot portraits weddings etc would have definitely kept it.
So true Tony 👍👍
Is it ok for indoor sports shooting?
Ive never tried it for sports, but i would thinks so,especially if its paired with one of the newer cameras like the xh2
@@ian_worth I have the xt4
Super nice, I don't own this lens I do own a Viltrox, However I stop buying anything from China very much enjoy your video's!!!
Glad you like them! 👍🙏🙏
I waited a long time for the video about the lens. I use the xf55-200 in landscape photography, otherwise I use the same lenses as you. I'm thinking about switching to the 50-140 because of the 2.8 aperture. But your problems after 5 years, even with frequent use, must not be. I would contact fuji. maybe something can be done there. Greetings from germany
Cheers buddy, Its a great lens, just didn't last as long as I'd hoped. I'm probably being too heavy handed with it. lol
Did you install the newest firmware 1.31?
Where did you get your L bracket/grip ?
Fujifilm UK do a very good fixed pricing repair service, log on and they give your a guaranteed price.
Absolutely mate, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
How much video
I'd be interested in a more compact 50-140 f4-5.6. Something that would be really small for travel. The telephoto zooms are just as big as full frame and I choose to shoot telephoto bright light work with Micro Four Thirsds. For low light I use my primes on Fuji (Viltrox 85mm f1.8 and Fuji 50mm f2).
Fuji's 55-200 is pretty small already. 50-230 even smaller.
@@thegrayyernaut relatively small. But not as small as the 35-100 f4-5.6 on MFT. Now that's not a good comparison but just saying.
I think it needs a bit of maintenance perhaps?
Yeah, I'm kind of thinking if it needs a new mount, a service and new motors, it will probably be worth me saving up and buying a new one 👍
@@ian_worth A bit of maintenance will probably turn out cheaper than outright replacement! 😉
I would expect a good lens to last at least 20 years!
I wouls send it off to Fujifilm and have them fix 'er up....
Absolutely mate, just wanted to share my findings so others could know what to expect in terms of longevity 👍
Appreciate the honest review.
Really? 10 minutes of monologue for a single shot of a rock??
Boring 🙄
Interesting review. You should do a 3-5yr review for other items in your bag
Good idea! 😊🙏