Self-important BBC interviewer crushed by Jill Stein, US Green Party candidate for President

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 12 авг 2016
  • August 12, 2016, BBC News interview with Dr. Jill Stein, the Green Party candidate for President of the United States of America.

Комментарии • 483

  • @rv6672
    @rv6672 7 лет назад +43

    She did a good job against this corporate troll.

    • @nash984954
      @nash984954 7 лет назад +3

      She's really good at holding her own place in a discussion and making better points, too.

    • @zacharysanford6345
      @zacharysanford6345 7 лет назад +4

      She addressed that though... I don't understand how you claim she dodged it.

  • @hueyfreeman4366
    @hueyfreeman4366 7 лет назад +72

    the reality is if jill wasn't the third option I would just not vote..... so my voting for jill isn't a vote that would otherwise count for hillary....

    • @numchucklee4279
      @numchucklee4279 7 лет назад +18

      me too, i first started supporting jill - then switched to bernie - now i am switching back. hilliary would never get my vote.

    • @Jugivadi
      @Jugivadi 7 лет назад +11

      Same here, the two clowns in the main parties were never going to get my vote.

    • @nat-hh2rz
      @nat-hh2rz 7 лет назад +1

      The reality is though that Jill Stein will NOT win. I wish she could but the reality is you has a chance with Sanders he failed so you have two choices you may survive Hilary but Trump will literally start ww3

    • @hueyfreeman4366
      @hueyfreeman4366 7 лет назад +6

      nat1717 I actually have 5 choices.... hillary, trump, gary, jill, or nobody.....
      If your point is only trump and Hillary can win, point taken.

    • @k2k4
      @k2k4 7 лет назад +5

      if jill stein isn't on the ballot then I write her in and draw a crude picture of a middle finger since my write in vote won't be counted in my state.

  • @aubreydebliquy8051
    @aubreydebliquy8051 7 лет назад +49

    If the best reason to vote Trump is Hillary and the best reason to vote Hillary is Trump then the lesser evil scare tactic falls flat and people may now chose Green rather than an evil Red or Blue.

    • @DarylBuck
      @DarylBuck 7 лет назад +1

      Retire them with a hangman's noose.

    • @innersting3174
      @innersting3174 7 лет назад +3

      Absolutely Aubrey.

    • @zombiasnow15
      @zombiasnow15 7 лет назад +3

      yes!!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

    • @ShaniaDeville
      @ShaniaDeville 7 лет назад +2

      Yes! I'm a big fan of this woman and how she cares about the environment and the education system. Just turned 18 and I will definitely be voting for her. #greenparty

    • @aubreydebliquy8051
      @aubreydebliquy8051 7 лет назад +3

      Madam President Jill Stein sounds good. Then women get a worthy ambassador and not this obscene, deplorable political whore who Obama said will say anything and change nothing.

  • @koondogmcfry9333
    @koondogmcfry9333 7 лет назад +36

    Did this guy seriously ask if it makes sense to not pollute the planet??

    • @DarylBuck
      @DarylBuck 7 лет назад +2

      Yep, and NOW ya KNOW just exactly what WE ARE up against,

    • @thomasyasi6633
      @thomasyasi6633 7 лет назад +2

      This is the epitome of corporate the media, the BBC, and this fucking guy what a jackass

    • @DarylBuck
      @DarylBuck 7 лет назад

      Ya they're betting their ASSES on WE CAN BE CONTROLLED. They've NEVER SEEN Human Blood Lust. I HAVE. THEY ARE SOOO FUCKED, and it WILL BE UGLY. But when the Wicked are set on the Ones that are EVIL.... Well let's just say you can solve more than one problem at a time. Hands FREE even.

  • @ChannelRichard
    @ChannelRichard 7 лет назад +120

    Jill Stein handled that rude "interviewer" like a boss. That man was F'ing GROSS.

    • @Jugivadi
      @Jugivadi 7 лет назад +12

      These so called pundits don't make any sense. They claim she's nothing. She's nowhere in this race, and then they claim she can turn the tide and put Donald in the White House. You pundits need to get your logic in order.

    • @ChannelRichard
      @ChannelRichard 7 лет назад +7

      EXACTLY! They can't have it both ways.

    • @nothingelsematters8529
      @nothingelsematters8529 7 лет назад +5

      Absolutly agree!! She is the Candidate to go!!

    • @JuliusGalacki
      @JuliusGalacki 7 лет назад +1

      Bernie started at one percent and nearly won (and perhaps did if the election fraud studies are right). But yes, it's still highly unlikely that Stein can win, but it can be the beginning of truly viable progressive alternative. And a strong showing will force the Democrats to be less overtly corporate at least if Clinton wins as is likely. You gotta think long term not just this immediate election.

    • @nothingelsematters8529
      @nothingelsematters8529 7 лет назад +2

      *****​ Agreed.. Would be interresting, if the green party would become a movement, gaining more traction in both houses.. 

  • @gordonthomson1427
    @gordonthomson1427 7 лет назад +112

    The BBC should not employ arrogant , self-important creeps like this one. Atrocious .
    Apparently he believes that fracking jobs are more important than the water supply.
    Ignorance like his may qualify him for a job as a spokesman for the money before lives clique.
    He did not once give a rational rebuttal of anything she said.
    This was nothing more than a hit-job on her.
    SHAME !!!

    • @jonathanfelicianovaneijndh7077
      @jonathanfelicianovaneijndh7077 7 лет назад +6

      Exacly Well Sad !

    • @yeees123
      @yeees123 7 лет назад +11

      NOT ONLY IS HE arrogant, but he uses fallacious logic, that is the problem. Comparing his height to elections? This is down right...moronic...

    • @michaelfavor5826
      @michaelfavor5826 7 лет назад +7

      who is this shameless man. he is not playing a devils advocate. it is obvious he is there to do a political hit job

    • @innersting3174
      @innersting3174 7 лет назад +2

      You both said a mouthful. This prick is clearly bucking for his big corporate promotion. What an arrogant asshole. She is so bright, classy and composed. I wish he could listen to himself...so I wouldn;t have to...

    • @tovangar
      @tovangar 7 лет назад

      The interviewer's name is Matthew Amroliwala
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Amroliwala
      @AmroliwalaBBC (on twitter)

  • @abigailjoseph6908
    @abigailjoseph6908 7 лет назад +124

    I am ashamed that this supposed journalist works for the BBC.
    Jill Stein should be proud, she came off well despite the ignorant and patronising tone of the interviewer

    • @lucien927
      @lucien927 7 лет назад +11

      Fuck those orwellian journalists!

    • @nothingelsematters8529
      @nothingelsematters8529 7 лет назад +6

      Absolute agree!! He is lobbying the establishment!!

    • @nothingelsematters8529
      @nothingelsematters8529 7 лет назад +5

      ***** That is not our point, but the behavoir he showes.. He is very rude, askes questions and intterups, when she states her answer.. He was very disrespectful, and behaved like the morrones on Fox News, interviewing her.. You know, why she is not known very well, or her chances are as low?? Bc she has not the TV coverage 3rd Parties deserve, the stakes are to high to enter presidential debates and US mainstream Media prefferes to lobby the 2 party system, where you have a choice between a mad Man (who dose not realy want to become the president) and a woman, who is willing to step over corpses to get back into the White House.. She is deeper into cooperate pockets then any candidate before, and on top of that, seems to be very sick!!

    • @nothingelsematters8529
      @nothingelsematters8529 7 лет назад +5

      Well.. I do not envy for the dicissions the States have to make, by choosing between Pest and Colera.. But you realize, the 2 party system you have there, is only because you CHOOSE to vote for the lesser EVIL.. All the time!! Hillery is no single bit better then Trump!! She is not the lesser evil..

    • @nothingelsematters8529
      @nothingelsematters8529 7 лет назад +2

      ***** Agreed, she is not as bad as Trump, but she is still a hwak and all the Neo Cons are standing by, to help her push the States in 3 more conflicts.. Closing in Russia with the NATO, sending a fleet to the South Chinese Sea and continuesly sawing an Assads chair.. She will have no issue to go to war.. But, Trump said, a Nuclear option with Russia should mot be taken off the table, that puts hime on a similar level like the new PM in the UK, who states, if there are Nukes in the arsenal, the world should be aware, she is willing to use them, if necessary.. Interresting times ahead!! I think, the Doomsdayclock can be dedusted again, bc we are resetting to 11.55..

  • @SurfinScientist
    @SurfinScientist 7 лет назад +20

    I noticed that Jill Stein does better when the interviewer is non-friendly. She's a great debater!

  • @jamieholmes5443
    @jamieholmes5443 7 лет назад +36

    YES! I love how she dos not let him interupt her. That interviewer is a sheep huh?

  • @baby-boomer3693
    @baby-boomer3693 7 лет назад +13

    Jill Stein rocks! she owned his self righteous ass! I used to think the BBC had class. I was mistaken.

  • @akmal94ibrahim
    @akmal94ibrahim 7 лет назад +13

    Come on Americans! Get her into the debates

  • @Tlimfree2010
    @Tlimfree2010 7 лет назад +28

    there is a level of irritation arises within me seeing this sexist, bigot keeps on cutting in and interrupting the guest, but on the other hand, it shows how well #JillStein responds with proper attitude and logic. This is the attitude of a good leader

    • @orionsghost9511
      @orionsghost9511 7 лет назад +8

      Absolutely agree with that, Tony. I've seen her do this in multiple interviews thus far. She is very cool and collected, and seems to think on her feet very well.

    • @NkoziKulu
      @NkoziKulu 7 лет назад +2

      disagreeing with a woman is not 'sexist' .......

    • @Tlimfree2010
      @Tlimfree2010 7 лет назад +1

      +NkoziKulu thank you for your input.

    • @NkoziKulu
      @NkoziKulu 7 лет назад +1

      ***** no..... just rude, nothing more.

  • @abemartin6297
    @abemartin6297 7 лет назад +10

    Now she uses the real revolutionary language such as " indebted=indentured servitude"

  • @ImproveYourMagic
    @ImproveYourMagic 7 лет назад +17

    Yet again, Jill Stein shows that she can keep a cool head while remaining focused. This guy behaves as if he has ties to the DNC or to the Clinton Foundation.

  • @wayneenterprise463
    @wayneenterprise463 7 лет назад +10

    You got my vote Dr.Jillstein, amazing answers!

  • @cazd4590
    @cazd4590 7 лет назад +14

    The framing of the questions by this journalist is pathetic and hilarious. What a sham mainstream media has become. It's disgusting.

    • @nash984954
      @nash984954 7 лет назад +1

      Intentional distraction to dissuade and move the discussion to remove her views from serious discussion...he failed though.

  • @Khusrav96
    @Khusrav96 7 лет назад +10

    This guy should interview Hillary and Trump and see if their policies make much more sense.

  • @runeh3022
    @runeh3022 7 лет назад +8

    Gotta give it too her, she answers like a champ!

  • @RFKjrForPres
    @RFKjrForPres 7 лет назад +21

    BBC shouldn't be cheerleaders for the Demo-Republicrat Two Party Duopoly. It's a shame on the BBC. I'm voting for Jill Stein and not being dissuaded by the establishment press in this country or any other country.

    • @hloyhesit8403
      @hloyhesit8403 7 лет назад +1

      WABASM!

    • @RFKjrForPres
      @RFKjrForPres 7 лет назад

      What does that mean?

    • @hloyhesit8403
      @hloyhesit8403 7 лет назад

      +Major Tim To Ground Control it's lik saying "BAM!"

    • @RFKjrForPres
      @RFKjrForPres 7 лет назад

      "Smack on"

    • @adamyoussef2257
      @adamyoussef2257 7 лет назад +1

      They are not. They are cheerleaders for Clinton.
      US elections isn't the only area where BBC reports this way. Should be named BPC.

  • @raykirkham114
    @raykirkham114 7 лет назад +9

    Would this turkey interviewer question Clinton or Trump this way or would he merely genuflect and toss them a few soft balls? Jill was more than this guy's equal. Let the debates begin.

  • @EasternMarshLands
    @EasternMarshLands 7 лет назад +5

    Journalism MUST stay neutral. This guy is just openly attacking Dr. Stein!

  • @ronreiserer8556
    @ronreiserer8556 7 лет назад +7

    Jill Rocks! She is more politically correct than any other candidate. Just imagine the response of the other candidates being interviewed like that. She was cool the whole time and got her points in whether the interviewer liked it or not. Go Jill!!!

  • @winchesterlyon
    @winchesterlyon 7 лет назад +22

    Sounds like he was given talking points and questions and quite frankly none of them seems to care about "democracy". This resemble the CNN/MSNBC interviews with Bernie during the primaries..

    • @orionsghost9511
      @orionsghost9511 7 лет назад +3

      England, surely, doesn't know much about democracy. They have a literal welfare queen. Not that we get it, either.

    • @orinlee6123
      @orinlee6123 7 лет назад +1

      We are headed for monarchy with an imperial warhawk hive queen chimera thing in the oval office... -.-

    • @chamboyette853
      @chamboyette853 7 лет назад +2

      Ikr. I was very disappointed to see such cheap propaganda coming from the BBC. I used to think they were much better than that.

    • @amlecciones
      @amlecciones 7 лет назад +2

      Difference this time is people see it clearly and thanks to wiki leaks and DNC leaks we know how corruptedly linked mainstream media is not only in corporate America but corporate UK and the rest of corporate institutions in the world.

    • @chamboyette853
      @chamboyette853 7 лет назад +1

      Aaron Lecciones I see this, and you see this, but it is incredible how many Americans are so brainwashed that they still believe mainstream media in spite of this. Such is not the case in France. Do you know how it is in England?

  • @leahpabst6054
    @leahpabst6054 7 лет назад +8

    Great job Jill!!!! You shut this guy down!!!

  • @theyamahac40
    @theyamahac40 7 лет назад +4

    As a Syrian it saddens me how Americans have a choice like Dr.Jill and they are still gonna vote for corruption and organized crime.
    What's wrong with world?

  • @PseudoAccurate
    @PseudoAccurate 7 лет назад +5

    Jill seems like a sweet, genuine person. I like all of her propositions that I've seen. I really like how she handles the press. Her message is on point and she never falters from making that point. If enough people could hear her message it could start a movement.

  • @theodoreruleoflaw2277
    @theodoreruleoflaw2277 7 лет назад +22

    Young fellow, if you know all the answers already, why are you bothering to interview her? Youre disabusing me of my fond notion that you in the old country are worldly-wiser and more sophisticated than we are.
    Oh, wait, Dick Cheney suckered your Tony Blair back into Afghânistân after you repeatedly got your asses kicked by the Afghâns under the Râj.
    I love the way she keeps smiling, but on the other hand, dude is ridiculous, so its possibly not all that hard. In fact shes smiling more, At this rate shell be laughing out loud before hes done. …

    • @winchesterlyon
      @winchesterlyon 7 лет назад

      He's trying to blame Nader for Bush, but who were to blame for Blair??

    • @JuliusGalacki
      @JuliusGalacki 7 лет назад +4

      No one blames Jeb Bush for disenfranchising 50,000 voters from the rolls for Gore losing. No one blames 100's of thousands of Democrats who crossed over for Bush. No one blames the 3 other minor parties that each took over 500 votes... and Bush only won by 500... and of course, no one blames Gore for blowing it on multiple levels.

    • @nikki9759
      @nikki9759 7 лет назад +3

      #jillStein bcz #integrityMatters

    • @parallax5000
      @parallax5000 7 лет назад +1

      The powerful always try to distract the gullible by placing the blame on the ones who are the least powerful to make an impact. Sucess! The consumers have a bone to fight over while the powerful continue business as usual. No one in Congress actually cares who occupies the Oval Office because it doesn't matter. The President is only there short term (due to term limits on the POTUS and not Congress) so if they don't get satisfaction from this person they'll get it from another (or coerce the President to cooperate if they can't get anyone else to play ball.)

  • @k2k4
    @k2k4 7 лет назад +5

    omg he even says "enough about policy, lets talk about your chances of winning the race?" seriously if we voted based only on who may be winning, then we will never get the candidates who we need.

  • @sailorboy165
    @sailorboy165 7 лет назад +5

    Jill stein embodies exactly how i feel about my country and the planet i tired of this enslavement

  • @nothingelsematters8529
    @nothingelsematters8529 7 лет назад +10

    Jill Stein!! Great lady!!

  • @CareFreeWherever
    @CareFreeWherever 7 лет назад +3

    Many people say this guy was rude. But it's very important to subject politicians to hard questions. And damn did Stein do well. She is so good at responding to criticism with concise accurate answers.

    • @Sarchein
      @Sarchein 7 лет назад +1

      The thing is that the questions are gotcha' ya questions

  • @jamesdean1695
    @jamesdean1695 7 лет назад +9

    In a perfect world she would be in the headlines leading the poles

    • @amlecciones
      @amlecciones 7 лет назад

      The poles from end to end and all over the waiter, including the polls.

    • @leavemealone4904
      @leavemealone4904 7 лет назад

      1776 letfreedomring 100% she would be headlining the poles. She is, but not let in. We need a bigger noise somehow to prise open the doors

  • @marjannourai3286
    @marjannourai3286 7 лет назад +1

    He is NOT a JOURNALIST! Good job Jill for being a strong , smart, elegant respectful candidate! I hope the American people will wake up, hear you, and see you.

  • @nancythecat1079
    @nancythecat1079 7 лет назад +2

    She has an excellent answer each time. I'm quite impressed.

  • @numchucklee4279
    @numchucklee4279 7 лет назад +2

    Corporations are afraid, this is exactly what they did to bernie to shut him up...

  • @coolbreeze7356
    @coolbreeze7356 7 лет назад +2

    Jill destroys the bs that the two sides try to spew at her. Right or left she is the common sense level headed person that should lead us through these troubling times.

  • @kamranuser1
    @kamranuser1 7 лет назад +3

    Interviewer is full of it.

  • @jacklinton257
    @jacklinton257 7 лет назад +2

    Wow she literally used this journalists bad questioning to deliver to the audience her platform policies. That was extraordinary.

  • @legato699
    @legato699 7 лет назад +2

    I love her, though :"We need to stand up for the right things", while the BBC host tries to cut her off.

  • @tpl2023
    @tpl2023 7 лет назад +1

    All the interviewer did was serve to ellivate Stein. She handled that interview with class and power

  • @numchucklee4279
    @numchucklee4279 7 лет назад +3

    This guy is a corporate stooge. good job jill.

  • @pjamesbda
    @pjamesbda 7 лет назад +1

    She was more of a gentleman than he was to be sure. And certainly more intelligent!

  • @koondogmcfry9333
    @koondogmcfry9333 7 лет назад +2

    The argument that a vote for someone is a vote for someone else defies logic. Trump supporters will tell you that a vote for Jill Stein is a vote for Hillary, and HRC supporters tell you a vote for Jill is a vote for Trump.
    I do know that a vote for Hillary or Trump is a vote for corruption and war.

  • @ottrovgeisha2150
    @ottrovgeisha2150 7 лет назад +3

    The level of the host's unobjectivity, lack of logic, even hidden resentment, probably from selfish considerations, and obnoxiousness is a bit difficult to take frankly.

  • @angelospoto3329
    @angelospoto3329 7 лет назад +1

    Stein was poised, articulate, spoke with great conviction, and was genuine in all her responses. The BBC ass who did the interview needs to get over himself. Even with his cynical questioning and constant interrupting, she delivered a rock, soild message.

  • @i5m1thy
    @i5m1thy 7 лет назад +1

    On behalf of the UK I apologise for this absolute tool.

  • @Epyrian04
    @Epyrian04 7 лет назад +2

    Wow, this interviewer is so disrespectful! And Stein crushed him. hahaha

  • @rislam59
    @rislam59 7 лет назад +2

    The math is not really controversial. 50% of the eligible voters that don't vote can make anyone win if they care to vote. If you know that each American pays $50,000 for sustaining the war, you can begin to become reasonable. People forget Bernie Sanders was trailing Hillary by 70 points.

  • @Asenueh
    @Asenueh 7 лет назад +1

    The BBC anchor was intellectually dishonest in the framing of his questions, suggesting that the answer he expects will be wrong.

  • @suspendedhatch
    @suspendedhatch 7 лет назад +1

    I'm floored by the BBC's naked bias.

  • @MrMadvibez
    @MrMadvibez 7 лет назад +1

    True class makes rudeness really accentuate its ugliness

  • @anneporter123
    @anneporter123 7 лет назад +1

    The harder the attacks, the better Jill is!! So proud. So happy. I love you Jill!

  • @peterblomstrom3961
    @peterblomstrom3961 7 лет назад

    That reporter was trying to use all the familiar shock tactics and she defeated him.

  • @juligrlee
    @juligrlee 7 лет назад +2

    The debate rules are controlled by the multinational corporations, many of which are headquartered in London with their banking in the Bermudas.

  • @HaHaroni
    @HaHaroni 7 лет назад +1

    How can the BBC tolerate such an obnoxious interviewer?

  • @specialandroid1603
    @specialandroid1603 7 лет назад +4

    unprofessional interview by the BBC - nothing new

  • @unbrnwsh
    @unbrnwsh 7 лет назад +2

    According to BBC (representing the .01%) President of the USA has to be a politician. Sure that would be great for the .01% since then he/she will comprise for their benefit since money talks. What we really need is a Statesmen or Stateswoman as the President.

  • @martellsimpson7199
    @martellsimpson7199 7 лет назад +2

    What a bully...Good Job, Jill....

  • @leavemealone4904
    @leavemealone4904 7 лет назад

    Jill Stein is what we have been waiting for. DO NOT MISS IT. Support her any way you can think of.

  • @agnosticii
    @agnosticii 7 лет назад

    That interviewer is an absolute c word. Jill Stein is brilliant and remarkably patient.

  • @alexdavila8240
    @alexdavila8240 7 лет назад +1

    I will write her in if they don't put her on the ballot.
    jill stein 2016

  • @agent42q
    @agent42q 7 лет назад +1

    A) The BBC apparently need a refresher on how the US President is elected.
    B) They need a review of their journalistic policies, if they honestly feel she doesn't have a shot or isn't worth the time. Why are they interviewing her? By their own words essentially they are wasting their viewers time.
    C) To get someone as important and interesting as Jill Stein and shout her down? That's just a poor interview.
    I don't care that the guy is rude, I care that this is showing bigger problems.

  • @lucien927
    @lucien927 7 лет назад +3

    Jill Stein 2016.

  • @carolsecret7517
    @carolsecret7517 7 лет назад +1

    This dude was rude! Jill was Smart and informative despite him! VOTE JILL!!!!

  • @marjannourai3286
    @marjannourai3286 7 лет назад +1

    This BBC interviewer sound more like a FOX news actor! Where the hell did he come from?

  • @phillipbeltre353
    @phillipbeltre353 7 лет назад

    Jill Stein deserves so much props for the way she handled these questions

  • @rageagainstmyhatchet
    @rageagainstmyhatchet 7 лет назад +2

    Wow, - 90% of his questions were either: Aren't you ashamed of splitting the vote of the real parties? or Aren't you aware that you're actually not a real candidate and the real candidates are trying to have a debate?
    We've known it for many years here in the UK, - when a nice establishment representative is on the air, they'll get a few testing questions to give the impression of "rigour", but when you move outside of the Box, the BBC just shuts you down and makes sure that anyone watching thinks you're a joke. The BBC = filth

  • @morgannemacdonald3254
    @morgannemacdonald3254 7 лет назад +1

    BBC Gentleman is a jerk. Let her actually answer your questions and you may be surprised by the coherent nature of her answers.

  • @leavemealone4904
    @leavemealone4904 7 лет назад

    NATIONWIDE
    STATE BALLOT ACCESS!! Today 15 Sept 2016
    Mr BBC interviewer. You are what??

  • @juligrlee
    @juligrlee 7 лет назад +1

    The physical exertion implication is such a sexist question. He's saying that females are easily exhausted. In point of fact, women have much more biological ability to survive and thrive over longer periods of time without the rest needed by men. How many men could withstand a muscle contraction that lasts continuously for 24-36+ hours as most women can endure during the exercise of the largest muscle in the human body, namely the uterine muscle.

  • @qualix7
    @qualix7 7 лет назад

    Goddamn! Every time I see this woman speak, she's more charming than the last. She piles through rude interviewers with grace and dignity. Jill Stein NEEDS to be our next president.

  • @MrMassivefavour
    @MrMassivefavour 7 лет назад +1

    wonderful lady. By far the most intelligent choice for president the voters have. plus.... not bought, plus....very likeable, plus.....a force for good, plus..... honest, plus... a much needed change!

  • @hinxlinx
    @hinxlinx 7 лет назад +2

    This interruptive reporter is awful with a condescending tone. Typical in major news agency these days.

  • @TigerPrawn_
    @TigerPrawn_ 7 лет назад +1

    Yaaas queen.
    Who is this BBC interviewer? He sounds like a Fox broadcaster!

  • @ThePhunboy
    @ThePhunboy 7 лет назад +1

    The BBC becomes more of a mouthpiece for the right all the time.

  • @kellyd6619
    @kellyd6619 7 лет назад

    Great interview with Jill Stein! She was thoughtful, poised, honest, and intelligent. I agree with her policies that are very doable and will create a better world for all! I'm voting for Jill Stein!

  • @immortalis1001
    @immortalis1001 7 лет назад

    The most difficult election ever...do you vote for a sociopath or do you vote for a sociopath or do you vote for Jill Stein?

  • @WeaponizedPanda
    @WeaponizedPanda 7 лет назад

    This interviewer asked many questions along the same lines as her Fox News interview. The questions are designed to corner her in an 'a-ha' moment; but, Dr. Stein handled them all with poise and grace, and she stayed on point backed up with facts. It is unfortunate that she is polling so low, but the system is designed to keep intelligent independents like her and her campaign out of public view, as she had said.

  • @lsipahelut
    @lsipahelut 7 лет назад +3

    I haven't watched TV for a few months now to the benefit of my own sanity. I obtain information from online sources of my own choice and I have found that instead of taking everything in passively I am now more likely to do my own research. That anchorman btw doesn't have a clue about what he's talking about; he doesn't have a clue from where Stein is coming from.

  • @GOGOLH
    @GOGOLH 7 лет назад +1

    It's the BBC that's out of time.

  • @diMizza09
    @diMizza09 7 лет назад +1

    kinda glad he threw hardball (as rude af as they were) but she got to show that she is the real deal, although she won't win, she's got my v

  • @nikki9759
    @nikki9759 7 лет назад +2

    #jillStein bcz #integrityMatters

  • @bogavante89
    @bogavante89 7 лет назад +1

    Is this guy even interviewing? What kind of remarks are these. Rude bbc.

  • @techionontangle4980
    @techionontangle4980 7 лет назад

    We need more Airtime!

  • @philipterry2141
    @philipterry2141 7 лет назад

    Well done Jill - keep the message going. You are a true inspiration....

  • @shadus7218
    @shadus7218 7 лет назад

    Hell yeah Jill Stein handled that rude interviewer. The more that I have looked into her the more I like her. I wish Bernie would have endorsed her instead of Clinton. It is important to vote for something you believe in instead of against somebody you don't like.

  • @CCRyder-vm2tu
    @CCRyder-vm2tu 7 лет назад +1

    Intelligence and innovation in politics. It could catch on if the youth are not swayed by the illusion of hopelessness. Cynicism in journalism is never a good platform for questioning. Disappointed in the BBC

  • @Soaringthezidang
    @Soaringthezidang 7 лет назад

    Jill you are a beautiful soul. My vote will not be wasted. Nevada heads up. No one is voting for Killary or Drumpf.

  • @tunupa1
    @tunupa1 7 лет назад +1

    This bloke was no match for Jill.

  • @cherriegetison6093
    @cherriegetison6093 7 лет назад

    Dr. Jill Stein is so classy. If only Jill and Gary could fuse into one person and create one debate-viable candidate. Jill Johnson: economic moderate candidate of peace. Imperfect, but vastly superior to the top two options.

  • @kailaleegibbons6143
    @kailaleegibbons6143 7 лет назад +1

    Jill held her own, but I still wish her public speaking was less politician sound bites. She could have called out the interviewer's manipulation much stronger if she didn't stick to party lines.

  • @parisabanks1333
    @parisabanks1333 7 лет назад +1

    I'm so glad she demolished him. He sounds like a spoiled child. Very unprofessional. What is his name?

  • @chappiescollectables
    @chappiescollectables 7 лет назад

    Totally nailed it.

  • @jpalmer1287
    @jpalmer1287 7 лет назад +1

    Go Jill! Who owns the BBC? Corporations?

  • @numchucklee4279
    @numchucklee4279 7 лет назад +2

    passive aggressive and rude brit.

  • @syourke3
    @syourke3 7 лет назад +1

    Just proves what a pathetic joke the BBC really is - totally committed to the status quo.

  • @ladamyre1
    @ladamyre1 7 лет назад +2

    She's getting MY vote. Frankly my opinion is there is no difference between Hitlery and Trump. They're BOTH warmongering bigots. She just lies about being a bigot and he lies about being a warmonger.

    • @ladamyre1
      @ladamyre1 7 лет назад

      charles botha
      Yup, because as Ralph Nader said in the 2000 election, "If you go into that voting booth and vote for the lesser of two evils, at the end of the day, *you voted FOR evil*" When I vote, it's only when I can vote FOR something good.
      BTW, the last time I voted was for Obama in 2008, and I voted for him strictly *because* he was a black man. I'm a white man but I wanted little black boys to finally be able to put their heads on their pillows at night and dream of being president someday just as I did when I was a little boy.
      And that's going to be the ONLY good thing about Obama's presidency, sad to say. I unknowingly voted for an evil murderous man, but for a good principle in 2008.

  • @tangobango9653
    @tangobango9653 7 лет назад +2

    This BBC news guy is truly a BUFFOON!

  • @tjw3999
    @tjw3999 7 лет назад

    let jill into the debates and her numbers would sky rocket

  • @stevehartedief983
    @stevehartedief983 7 лет назад +1

    Who is that BBC poodle anyway ?
    I LUV Jill Stein , she is sending on my frequency.