I love these synth versions, the voices sound so clean and distinct. One of my frustrations with the church organ pieces is that things tend to get muddy, especially on a recording.
Completely agree. I only started to appreciate fully these works when I translated them into synthesizer music. With a real organ, even the division between Oberwek and Positiv (which should be easy to hear) is somewhat muddle to my ear.
Your dynamics and patches are flawless. And you create moments here I don't recall so beautiful ever before when listening to this classic of JSB's organ works. Sparkling with joy and energy, truly glorious! And regarding the fugue, I feel that by employing the synthesizer the different voices sound more transparent than with the church organ. I never heard this fugue in a clearer way. Wonderful!!!
I really love this! The other day I was listening to BWV 564 Fugue and I thought I'd love to listen to it in this style, so here's my suggestion in case it might interest you!
This is like a maturing of your art, seems to me. Well done! I'm glad you revised both movements and added a highlighted score. There's something hypnotic about both movements. One is kinetic--almost perpetual motion-like. the other is relentless in its obsession with stretto. I think when Bach got an idea he exhausted all the possibilities of its potential most of the time. I also want to express my appreciation that you have found a balance between the potential for sound color that electronic media provides but also for your attention to articulation and other purely musical considerations. You're still the only person that isn't using the medium as a player piano where one just "plugs in" new sound colors without any musical sense involved. Anybody can do that. Jus my opinion.
"...when Bach got an idea he exhausted all the possibilities of its potential most of the time" I get the same feeling - look no further than the art of the fugue. Thank you so much for your support and encouragement, it has been a journey for me, but always (almost always anyway) I have enjoyed the products of my work. I don't mean I have enjoyed making them, that's almost a given, I mean that I regularly listen to these videos, and I take notes when I hear something that could be done differently. In short: I produce the music that I want to listen to, perhaps it's normal, but to me it sounds a bit odd. I feel like I started this because I wanted to hear more of Wendy Carlos' work, but she only created a relatively limited corpus, so I had to get creative and do it myself. Perhaps this explains why I try (and you notice) to make my pieces as musical as possible.
Sure! It's all virtual (I don't have any hardware beside my laptop), I'm using Musescore to sequence the score, and Reaper as the DAW. In terms of VST, I'm only using free synths and effects (mostly Dexed, Model-E, Surge XT, plus a bunch of Reaper standard plugins for effects). I also use Reaper for video editing. Literally, the only thing I pay for is the licence for Reaper ($60). Talking about an affordable hobby :)
@@OrzoMondo thanks!! I’ve also picked synthing classical music as a hobby over the last few months, using musescore to sequence and Vital as a synth, but I’ve found Vital has some limitations and have been looking for something else to use. Will definitely trial Reaper, very happy to have found your channel!
@@aidenpeleg2789 Thank you! If you want to try another very powerful and free synth, I suggest Surge XT. In my opinion, time spent learning it it's time well spent :)
Thanks for this, OrzoMondo, I enjoyed it very much. This is one of those pieces I'm nowhere near capable of arranging in this way, so the 'how?' is also of interest to me. Thanks for that, too. I look forward to your next upload!
El concepto de la foto es genial, pero la ejecución de la AI hace que caiga en el montón. Desconozco la capacidad de la cuenta o las ganancias que le genera el canal, pero sería un acierto que en cuanto se pueda le pague a un artista para que trabaje sobre la minatura, le daría un detalle al canal y promovería el trabajo de un artista y le contribuiría económicamente. Pero es una observación sobre la miniatura. El trabajo que hacés es impresionante, el esfuerzo que debe haber detrás y luego cómo se siente tan bien los dinámicos son detalles que se aprecian y hacen destacar el producto. Gracias por ser quien satisface esta pequeña demanda.
Hola Joaquin, y muchas gracias por el agradecimiento! El beneficio que el canal me ha generado hasta ahora es de 0,05 euros, no creo que un artista acepte un pago de un céntimo por crear una imagen :) sin embargo, es una buena idea. Si conoces a alguien que haría esto gratis, ¡házmelo saber!
@@OrzoMondo Si se me ocurre algo o consiga contribuirte económicamente te lo hago saber a modo de apoyo, de momento solo puedo apoyar al canal beneficiando al algoritmo entonces estaré viendo tu canal. Pido disculpas por el idioma.
@@OrzoMondo la IA acá solo beneficia a tu contenido y yo simplemente me apresuré en exigir algo que en principio no corresponde, pero me encantan las ideas de tus miniaturas y no dejaré el canal pronto porque el contenido que ofrece es muy interesante, si puedo apoyarte en algún momento lo haré encantado
As you know, BWV 1052 is one-third done (you can find the first movement here: ruclips.net/video/iBunkSdNZmI/видео.html), but I am already working on the third movement. As for 553, definitely in the works, but less developed. It will come :)
I definitely think this is Bach's most sublime fugue.
True. It definitely grew on me. It became one of my favourites.
I agree. This is another of my favorites. The fugue really drives. BWV 915 ruclips.net/video/ERISHVNCmAk/видео.htmlsi=E_C7wekBsZWeHTwn
Not every composer could survive to this era and still be so fresh and vivid like that....its an insight for futuristic composers
It is absolutely amazing the modernity of it.
I love these synth versions, the voices sound so clean and distinct. One of my frustrations with the church organ pieces is that things tend to get muddy, especially on a recording.
Completely agree. I only started to appreciate fully these works when I translated them into synthesizer music. With a real organ, even the division between Oberwek and Positiv (which should be easy to hear) is somewhat muddle to my ear.
Simply PRECIOUS, molto obrigado Gran Signore
Thank you!
Your dynamics and patches are flawless. And you create moments here I don't recall so beautiful ever before when listening to this classic of JSB's organ works. Sparkling with joy and energy, truly glorious! And regarding the fugue, I feel that by employing the synthesizer the different voices sound more transparent than with the church organ. I never heard this fugue in a clearer way. Wonderful!!!
Thank you so much Andreas!!
Close to your well deserved first K subs💪
Thank you! I am planning to do something a little celebratory when I reach that first goal :)
Diese musik ist nicht von dieser Welt sondern von einem anderen Planeten aus der Ewigkeit 🎉🎉
Oh, du bist sehr nett, vielen Dank fürs Zuhören!
This is a wonderful piece of music to soon take with me into my subconscious journey through the long night.😌
Thank you!!
Just gets better
Thank you!
I really love this! The other day I was listening to BWV 564 Fugue and I thought I'd love to listen to it in this style, so here's my suggestion in case it might interest you!
Of course it does interest me! I am planning to do all the great fugues, so stay tuned :)
This is like a maturing of your art, seems to me. Well done! I'm glad you revised both movements and added a highlighted score. There's something hypnotic about both movements. One is kinetic--almost perpetual motion-like. the other is relentless in its obsession with stretto. I think when Bach got an idea he exhausted all the possibilities of its potential most of the time. I also want to express my appreciation that you have found a balance between the potential for sound color that electronic media provides but also for your attention to articulation and other purely musical considerations. You're still the only person that isn't using the medium as a player piano where one just "plugs in" new sound colors without any musical sense involved. Anybody can do that. Jus my opinion.
"...when Bach got an idea he exhausted all the possibilities of its potential most of the time"
I get the same feeling - look no further than the art of the fugue.
Thank you so much for your support and encouragement, it has been a journey for me, but always (almost always anyway) I have enjoyed the products of my work. I don't mean I have enjoyed making them, that's almost a given, I mean that I regularly listen to these videos, and I take notes when I hear something that could be done differently.
In short: I produce the music that I want to listen to, perhaps it's normal, but to me it sounds a bit odd.
I feel like I started this because I wanted to hear more of Wendy Carlos' work, but she only created a relatively limited corpus, so I had to get creative and do it myself. Perhaps this explains why I try (and you notice) to make my pieces as musical as possible.
❤
Thank you!
Bravo orzomondo
Grazie!
3:21
I love these! May I ask what synth/software you use?
Sure! It's all virtual (I don't have any hardware beside my laptop), I'm using Musescore to sequence the score, and Reaper as the DAW. In terms of VST, I'm only using free synths and effects (mostly Dexed, Model-E, Surge XT, plus a bunch of Reaper standard plugins for effects). I also use Reaper for video editing. Literally, the only thing I pay for is the licence for Reaper ($60). Talking about an affordable hobby :)
@@OrzoMondo thanks!! I’ve also picked synthing classical music as a hobby over the last few months, using musescore to sequence and Vital as a synth, but I’ve found Vital has some limitations and have been looking for something else to use. Will definitely trial Reaper, very happy to have found your channel!
@@aidenpeleg2789 Thank you! If you want to try another very powerful and free synth, I suggest Surge XT. In my opinion, time spent learning it it's time well spent :)
Thanks for this, OrzoMondo, I enjoyed it very much.
This is one of those pieces I'm nowhere near capable of arranging in this way, so the 'how?' is also of interest to me. Thanks for that, too.
I look forward to your next upload!
Thank you so much Karl! I am not sure I buy the "I'm nowhere near capable" part, I've listened to your work, you know? :)
El concepto de la foto es genial, pero la ejecución de la AI hace que caiga en el montón. Desconozco la capacidad de la cuenta o las ganancias que le genera el canal, pero sería un acierto que en cuanto se pueda le pague a un artista para que trabaje sobre la minatura, le daría un detalle al canal y promovería el trabajo de un artista y le contribuiría económicamente. Pero es una observación sobre la miniatura. El trabajo que hacés es impresionante, el esfuerzo que debe haber detrás y luego cómo se siente tan bien los dinámicos son detalles que se aprecian y hacen destacar el producto. Gracias por ser quien satisface esta pequeña demanda.
Hola Joaquin, y muchas gracias por el agradecimiento! El beneficio que el canal me ha generado hasta ahora es de 0,05 euros, no creo que un artista acepte un pago de un céntimo por crear una imagen :) sin embargo, es una buena idea. Si conoces a alguien que haría esto gratis, ¡házmelo saber!
@@OrzoMondo Si se me ocurre algo o consiga contribuirte económicamente te lo hago saber a modo de apoyo, de momento solo puedo apoyar al canal beneficiando al algoritmo entonces estaré viendo tu canal. Pido disculpas por el idioma.
@@OrzoMondo la IA acá solo beneficia a tu contenido y yo simplemente me apresuré en exigir algo que en principio no corresponde, pero me encantan las ideas de tus miniaturas y no dejaré el canal pronto porque el contenido que ofrece es muy interesante, si puedo apoyarte en algún momento lo haré encantado
@@joaquinascencio1054 Muchas gracias por tu apoyo y no te preocupes para nada por el idioma
When will you do BWV 1052 and 553??
As you know, BWV 1052 is one-third done (you can find the first movement here: ruclips.net/video/iBunkSdNZmI/видео.html), but I am already working on the third movement. As for 553, definitely in the works, but less developed. It will come :)