You must have the largest youtube library of click baity sounding titles without being click bait. Amazing how many intriguing questions there are to discover in the universe.
James Web keeps changing everything .... Like the idea that this unusual light shows us the formation of of a plasmoid that will focus energy and material to build and drive a galaxie full of stars.... It is described as starting with a z pinch in one of the large Birkland Currents that form the web like structure of the universe we observe.
The bots on here are out of hand: "Your channel is a place where I can always relax and enjoy great humor. Keep up your hilarious videos." Now I do agree with the notion that Anton's sense of humor is solid, but comedy is NOT the main reason anybody has clicked thumbnails for ever.
@@vapormissile They are fishing for you. You replied to one. Their objective is to solicit humans to volunteer personal and behavioral information by injecting prompts that are incongruous to us. This is slow training data.
A possible way for Population III stars to present metalicity (i.e. elements other than hydrogen in pop III stars.) Convection which can bring up elements produced by fusion. Massive, somewhat evolved stars -- such as Zeta Puppis (O4I) -- can have both helium and nitrogen on their surfaces (although they do not have surfaces like our G2V.)
@@christopherbrice5473 : yes, exactly. I wonder about the size range of those earliest black holes after the Big Bang, tiniest to most massive. Were there the tiny primordial black holes proposed by some? I assume the most massive were the seeds of the first galaxies, back when everything was close together. I’m no astrophysicist, but I’ve always imagined black holes of some kind played some role in dark matter.
Trying to imagine looking through our own galaxy that's holding a couple hundred billion stars, at whole other galaxies and stars at the beginning of the universe....and that's mind bending.
- Scientist 1: "How are we going to call the FIRST stars of the universe ?" - Scientist 2: "Population 3 stars" - Scientist 1: "Population 3 ? Why not Population1 ? Population 3 will just confuse people" - Scientist 2: "That's what we want"
At least in physics the names usually relate to the phenomena. In microbiology you are just memorizing endless Greek and Latin names which no connection (in English) to the microorganism. Learning scientific Greek and Latin is a big help
@@power2084 - That is much better than biology! For real though, I think some scientists enjoy the thought of making their profession opaque to the layman so they have “prestige”. Kind of like how the ancient churches would hold everything in Latin so the common people could not understand it
@@power2084 - It must happen at the phd level, because I only have a masters in chemistry and I don’t have a huge ego. When you become a scientist and have a PhD, it really seems to inflate the ego
I somewhat doubt that this is the result of Population III stars. This region is already one billion years old. The first Population III stars would have begun to appear when the Universe was only 400 million years old. There is no way that these stars would have survived for 600 million years.
There is a conflict between theory and facts. Population 3 stars should be a Giant stars, which is burning H in very high rate, but... the theory suggest that Giant stars is not producing Supernova, but is collapsing quietly directly into a Black Hole. The question is if all first stars must collapse into a Black Holes, where the mass of the Universe is coming from?... And this is not the only conflict between observations and theory.
I imagine some people on a planet in a galaxy 20 billion light years away looking at the light from our galaxy right now thinking the same thing we do about their galaxy. "Oh wow look at the early universe,"
If the skirt of the galaxy doesn’t displace enough mass, sometimes a crash will pierce and just pass through. So sometimes gasses will ionize; charge and or catch heavy density from condensation. As they condense, they displace the empty space making a gravitational pull more intense. The earth is spongy, but black holes and neutron stars are dense. They absolutely force empty black vacuum out. In that case, I’d have to guess, it’s probably ionized gas. Gasses in space can become superheated, due to compression effects. They act just like a pipe.
my apologies anton i didnt realize that my efforts to be helpful to humanity scientifically would be met with such resistance. love your show buddy bin watching for years. wont happen again.
I really wish they would change around the classifications for stellar populations - it makes no sense that the oldest are population 3 stars and the ours is a populatioon 1 star. It would make far more sense for the first stars to be Population 1, then Population 2, now Population 3 (stars like the Sun) and eventually we will get Pop 4 etc as their metallacity increases....
Your statement around 4:40 or so about the gravitation of the one galaxy powering the dwarf satellites and globular clusters and such got me to thinking about gravity, and the hypothetical antigravitational force which has yet to be actually discovered and documented. What if both examples of this force have the same effect on matter, the only difference being that the gravitational waves being produced are somehow different. Kind of like the spins and flavors of quarks or something.
A simple way to explain all these findings is to take the phase shift as a result from gravity of distant masses causeing light to loose energy and become redshifted. The sam Hubble formula is obtained this way. And that blackholes although true don't allow light out, but the are not singularities. Their central portion is pure radiation under extreme conditions and outer layers at gradually smaller pressure to zero at the surface. When a blackhole explodes due to some internal or external cuases, all sorts of matter is released whether today or before eons.
James Webb is the first device designed to look for pop. 3 stars, and it really is not that far into its mission. The fact that none have yet been found is preliminary. Still, is there a possibility that all the pop. 3 stars are already over the horizon with the expansion of the universe, and will never be visible to us? Thanks, Anton.
@@Tugela60 Before destroying the population 3 stars, the Vogons wrote epic poems describing the great beauty of these starts, individually and in groups. Unfortunately, Vogon poetry has gotten a bad reputation, due to one being from a planet described as "mostly harmless", so it's extremely unlikely that this poetry will ever be translated into any Earth llanguage.
The name "Black Hole" is properly misleading. If you think of a black hole as a round ball, so heavy it makes a deep hole in the fabric of space. The white hole would make sense if a black hole was the entrance to a wormhole-thingy and the white hole was an exit. Maybe a better name for a black hole would be a "gravi star".
Ahh the mythical population III stars... that might never be found because they don't exist and never have. Electric Universe theory says that higher elements are produced in the photosphere itself, NOT in supernovas exclusively.
I'm not sure if this has been asked and answered elsewhere, but were the laws of physics set at the birth of this universe or were they 'formed' afterwards? Was gravity a thing back then or did gravity come about after massive stars were formed? I know it seems like a nonsensical question, but I'd really like to know.
It is not so strange that the models are not working as predicted. Just think if the models were close and described the universe? I have to think if true that would be the greatest proof of our existence being in a simulation and since it is not true that the models work, that would make it seem that our existence is not in a simulation.
Let's play a drinking game where we drink every time Anton say the word Super. 😂 Don't get me wrong this is good so an astronomy noob like me could understand complex thing like this
Did the universe start with equal numbers of protons and electrons? How would we know? Talking about pristine hydrogen in gen. 3 stars had me thinking about that. I know it isn't so simple, but it makes me wonder what is possible. Could you have a black hole made of nothing but electrons?
How about the Galaxy is really full of gas and dust like a fluorescent tube. Now all you need is a very powerful stellar source that is ionizing the gas in the galaxy.
I'm hoping for the development of a functional time machine and hyperlight drive. We can then time warp, back to the early universe, discovering how it really developed.
![BabyChiefDoit - Too Slow (feat. STAR BANDZ) [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zayaxws7RPg/mqdefault.jpg)
You must have the largest youtube library of click baity sounding titles without being click bait. Amazing how many intriguing questions there are to discover in the universe.
He was so excited by the news in this video that he almost forgot his iconic "Hello, wonderful person, this is Anton"-intro
James Web keeps changing everything .... Like the idea that this unusual light shows us the formation of of a plasmoid that will focus energy and material to build and drive a galaxie full of stars.... It is described as starting with a z pinch in one of the large Birkland Currents that form the web like structure of the universe we observe.
Another miracle I can grasp slightly, but only because you've taken the time to break it down to us! Thank you for keeping me looking up!
The Ultimate Florescent light ! Thanks Anton!
Anton, I think you are a wonderfull person. Thanks for keeping me up to date about science.
Thank you Wonderful Anton, for doing videos we want to watch😊
Wonderful as always Anton. Thank you. 🫡🙂
The bots on here are out of hand: "Your channel is a place where I can always relax and enjoy great humor. Keep up your hilarious videos."
Now I do agree with the notion that Anton's sense of humor is solid, but comedy is NOT the main reason anybody has clicked thumbnails for ever.
I wonder what they're actually doing...
@@vapormissile They are fishing for you. You replied to one. Their objective is to solicit humans to volunteer personal and behavioral information by injecting prompts that are incongruous to us. This is slow training data.
In his defence (not the bots lol) but anton does have some witty banter at times lol
OK, our McDonald's is now hiring $25/hr. Moderate drug use OK
@@Nethershaw is it still you in there? Have you been assimilated? Has your uniqueness been added to the bots? Is resistance futile?! 🤖😱
Nothing like a video talking about the hottest young stars in the universe... 😂😂😂
Could've got more views using your title.
Always a fashinating topic 😜
These Stars have Gas 😊.
Pretty soon you're going to have to click a 'I am 18' button to view
Ppphhhfffttttt lol
Thank you for such an interesting video with such beautiful visuals and your easy to understand information and reassuring, soothing voice.
Thanks!
A possible way for Population III stars to present metalicity (i.e. elements other than hydrogen in pop III stars.) Convection which can bring up elements produced by fusion. Massive, somewhat evolved stars -- such as Zeta Puppis (O4I) -- can have both helium and nitrogen on their surfaces (although they do not have surfaces like our G2V.)
Imagine how many black holes those early stars turned into. There would have been an age of supernovae.
Imagine how many the early universe produced and are still lurking out there
@@christopherbrice5473 : yes, exactly. I wonder about the size range of those earliest black holes after the Big Bang, tiniest to most massive. Were there the tiny primordial black holes proposed by some? I assume the most massive were the seeds of the first galaxies, back when everything was close together. I’m no astrophysicist, but I’ve always imagined black holes of some kind played some role in dark matter.
Fascinating Anton, Fascinating!!!!
So cool😎. My money is on these stars being among the first of the generation two stars, formed from the death of primordial stars in that region.
Trying to imagine looking through our own galaxy that's holding a couple hundred billion stars, at whole other galaxies and stars at the beginning of the universe....and that's mind bending.
So fires in the old days used to warm up the local space ...wow, we learn something new every day.
That's very generous of the JWST!
Absolutely love that
Appreciate ya. Thanks for sharing.
Furzl-Fub, did you forget that you should not leave out the mirrors again? Whatever will poor earthlings think of it?!?!
- Scientist 1: "How are we going to call the FIRST stars of the universe ?"
- Scientist 2: "Population 3 stars"
- Scientist 1: "Population 3 ? Why not Population1 ? Population 3 will just confuse people"
- Scientist 2: "That's what we want"
At least in physics the names usually relate to the phenomena. In microbiology you are just memorizing endless Greek and Latin names which no connection (in English) to the microorganism. Learning scientific Greek and Latin is a big help
@@ElectronFieldPulse I would say that not more than 50% of the name is related to the phenomena.
@@power2084 - That is much better than biology! For real though, I think some scientists enjoy the thought of making their profession opaque to the layman so they have “prestige”. Kind of like how the ancient churches would hold everything in Latin so the common people could not understand it
@@ElectronFieldPulse "some" scientists.
@@power2084 - It must happen at the phd level, because I only have a masters in chemistry and I don’t have a huge ego. When you become a scientist and have a PhD, it really seems to inflate the ego
It is hard to search for something before we know what it looks like. Models only take you so far.
I somewhat doubt that this is the result of Population III stars. This region is already one billion years old. The first Population III stars would have begun to appear when the Universe was only 400 million years old. There is no way that these stars would have survived for 600 million years.
There is a conflict between theory and facts. Population 3 stars should be a Giant stars, which is burning H in very high rate, but... the theory suggest that Giant stars is not producing Supernova, but is collapsing quietly directly into a Black Hole. The question is if all first stars must collapse into a Black Holes, where the mass of the Universe is coming from?... And this is not the only conflict between observations and theory.
We've all been looking at a population III star this whole time, it's you Anton ❤☀️
Hello wonderful people have a good day! What a neat discovery.
Para você Aton Petrov possui ótimas informações, dicas e ideias 💡 ❤❤❤❤.
I imagine some people on a planet in a galaxy 20 billion light years away looking at the light from our galaxy right now thinking the same thing we do about their galaxy. "Oh wow look at the early universe,"
My daily video of making me smarter. ❤
Thank you Anton! 🙂
Thank you as always
If the skirt of the galaxy doesn’t displace enough mass, sometimes a crash will pierce and just pass through. So sometimes gasses will ionize; charge and or catch heavy density from condensation. As they condense, they displace the empty space making a gravitational pull more intense. The earth is spongy, but black holes and neutron stars are dense. They absolutely force empty black vacuum out. In that case, I’d have to guess, it’s probably ionized gas. Gasses in space can become superheated, due to compression effects. They act just like a pipe.
my apologies anton i didnt realize that my efforts to be helpful to humanity scientifically would be met with such resistance. love your show buddy bin watching for years. wont happen again.
Great video. Thanks for posting.
Fascinating!
Law 1 of 48: DO NOT OUTSHINE THE MASTER
Brilliant stuff!
I really wish they would change around the classifications for stellar populations - it makes no sense that the oldest are population 3 stars and the ours is a populatioon 1 star. It would make far more sense for the first stars to be Population 1, then Population 2, now Population 3 (stars like the Sun) and eventually we will get Pop 4 etc as their metallacity increases....
Right, they redefined the terms for Pluto, why not stars.
Your statement around 4:40 or so about the gravitation of the one galaxy powering the dwarf satellites and globular clusters and such got me to thinking about gravity, and the hypothetical antigravitational force which has yet to be actually discovered and documented. What if both examples of this force have the same effect on matter, the only difference being that the gravitational waves being produced are somehow different. Kind of like the spins and flavors of quarks or something.
4:25 ish...
Looking forward to your take on the recent “negative time” discovery by quantum scientists
Im suprised they havent looked at proxima B!3 planets in the habitable zone!Whats the hold up?should of been the first one to observe!
The Taco Bell galaxy. Nothing but hot glowing gas.
And unexpected violent expansion of such gases.
I told you it was the chalk dust! 😊
Old stars?
Cool!
A simple way to explain all these findings is to take the phase shift as a result from gravity of distant masses causeing light to loose energy and become redshifted. The sam Hubble formula is obtained this way. And that blackholes although true don't allow light out, but the are not singularities. Their central portion is pure radiation under extreme conditions and outer layers at gradually smaller pressure to zero at the surface. When a blackhole explodes due to some internal or external cuases, all sorts of matter is released whether today or before eons.
Please make a quick video about these two CME that happed today and the possible effects. Thanks
bravo, beau travail!
Interesting information thanks 👍❤
Keep an eye on it. If it keeps getting brighter and brighter, it might be a new Big Bang.
The light comes from primordial cosmic lightning bugs.
sounds like great idea to produce lgm1 type signal in this manner.... lets light it up , boys!
Anything is possible; that's what I like about today's Astro Physics.
Truly amazing
James Webb is the first device designed to look for pop. 3 stars, and it really is not that far into its mission. The fact that none have yet been found is preliminary. Still, is there a possibility that all the pop. 3 stars are already over the horizon with the expansion of the universe, and will never be visible to us?
Thanks, Anton.
man over the horizon is so ominous and terrifying
The population 3 stars were all demolished by the Vogons to make way for the new intergalatic highway. That is why there are none now.
@@Tugela60 Before destroying the population 3 stars, the Vogons wrote epic poems describing the great beauty of these starts, individually and in groups. Unfortunately, Vogon poetry has gotten a bad reputation, due to one being from a planet described as "mostly harmless", so it's extremely unlikely that this poetry will ever be translated into any Earth llanguage.
Maybe these sexy stars got tired of being so smart they bought a fluorescent light kit before they got completely phased out. Or maybe not.
"JWST Funds a Glowing Galaxy" That is why it cost so much!
I think they found population three stars
Hi Anton
Here's a question if we came in from a blackhole are whiteholes our exit outta here??
The name "Black Hole" is properly misleading. If you think of a black hole as a round ball, so heavy it makes a deep hole in the fabric of space.
The white hole would make sense if a black hole was the entrance to a wormhole-thingy and the white hole was an exit. Maybe a better name for a black hole would be a "gravi star".
I will be waiting at the restaurant at the end of the universe for the final results of cosmology :P
best teacher Mr. Petrov 🤭
That’s all great, James Webb. Now find planets with life.
It would be nice if "Artist Representations" were labeled as such
Really need it pointed out lol?
They all are!
Can we have a video about the “morning star” as seen through a gravitational lense please 🙏 thank you Anton 😊
JWST is funding galaxies now? It's even more amazing than I thought. 😉
"I'm gonna go get the papers, get the papers."
As resolution gets better, our info and theories will get better.
How kind of the telescope to fund a galaxy…I didn’t realise they had financial struggles 😏
🙋🏽♀️💖anton everyday
If the JWST is funding an entire galaxy, we now know why it was so expensive!
my model is telling me that this galaxy is very far away but its unreasonably shiny, ok then unreasonably shiny galaxy it is
Truly a testament to the idea that if there were aliens, the US Government would find a way to give money to them.
now witness the resolving power of this fully calibrated and operational space telescope.
Ahh the mythical population III stars... that might never be found because they don't exist and never have. Electric Universe theory says that higher elements are produced in the photosphere itself, NOT in supernovas exclusively.
I'd LOVE to go back twenty years! Hahaha
80,000K?! Goodness me…..
“As always bye bye”
You can just say bye man lol
He's just staying on Brand. 😅
I'm not sure if this has been asked and answered elsewhere, but were the laws of physics set at the birth of this universe or were they 'formed' afterwards? Was gravity a thing back then or did gravity come about after massive stars were formed? I know it seems like a nonsensical question, but I'd really like to know.
that was the death star exploding
I wonder what it would look like in the night sky if it was in the milkyway
It is not so strange that the models are not working as predicted. Just think if the models were close and described the universe? I have to think if true that would be the greatest proof of our existence being in a simulation and since it is not true that the models work, that would make it seem that our existence is not in a simulation.
Or that the current model of our simulations are not capable of simulating something as complex as our world.
Mother nature's gas lightbulb.
The absence of observers
Anton, why is there a space ship in bound to the galaxy behind you at 6.30?
“Hello” two minutes in…?
Let's play a drinking game where we drink every time Anton say the word Super. 😂 Don't get me wrong this is good so an astronomy noob like me could understand complex thing like this
I haf done dat for12 yearsh an an an my liversh d'shizhe of Shaturn now.🥴
Did the universe start with equal numbers of protons and electrons? How would we know? Talking about pristine hydrogen in gen. 3 stars had me thinking about that. I know it isn't so simple, but it makes me wonder what is possible. Could you have a black hole made of nothing but electrons?
No.
Leptogenesis.
Yes; cf. the Reissner-Nordström metric.
I bet you want to understand who understands the red shift thing but I guess I don't or I forgot were the recap of the aspect
Ðe JWST must be mega rich, even richer ðan Uncle Scrooge, to fund a whole galaxy 😅.
Plasma cosmology isn't going anyplace.
Take your time.
How fo we know how red shifted we all are?
Todays drinking game : anytime anton says 'super' !
(Bonk)
How about the Galaxy is really full of gas and dust like a fluorescent tube. Now all you need is a very powerful stellar source that is ionizing the gas in the galaxy.
if it was so common why only one was found....
I'll bet it isn't a disk ether.
The Big Rave at the End of the Universe. 🌌
The Restaurant at the End of the Universe.
It’s a black hole 🕳️
Population 2.5 ?
Here we go again with this stupid naming convention pop 1 2 and 3 but backwards….. rolling my eyes
I'm hoping for the development of a functional time machine and hyperlight drive. We can then time warp, back to the early universe, discovering how it really developed.