puntualmente lo de la religion lo habla mucho en la fatal arrogancia. Donde habla de la religion tradicional y plantea incluso como el socialismo entra en categoria de religion. pero sobre como hay que llevarse bien, por lo menos no TENEMOS que llevarnos mal con los religiosos lo explica en la segunda mitad de libro
"The industrialists, and so called liberal economists and conservative circles always open the door to all brown dictatorships. We are talking about a political-ideological relationship, and sometimes an identity. Of course, not all liberals are fascists, but Friedman, Mises, Hayek and Rand were quite close to fascist thinkers. Hayek, the iconic economists at the Austrian Economic School, admired and support Hitler for the economic model, because it was extremely liberalized and the dictatorship was then apologized by seeing the dictatorship as a transitional phase for the truly liberal society, much like Marxists see the dictatorship of the proletariat as a transitional phase to the classless society. Alan Bullock : "Hitler: A Study in Tyranny.”
XavierFernández that’s the problem with ignorance, and the leftist tend to be real champions in this regard. Thus, they are incapable to see much more complexity but the two sides of a coin: if you are not leftist, you are fascist. 🤪 Of course, what fascism actually is, glues completely beyond their intelectual capacity of understanding. And to understand that communism and fascism are basically the same thing, well, that of course would blow their mind
@@enricolucarelli816: 1) "That’s the problem with ignorance, and the leftist tend to be real champions in this regard. Thus, they are incapable to see much more complexity but the two sides of a coin: if you are not leftist, you are fascist. Well! Your reasoning is exactly like the ideology you supposedly are denying. I ask you. Are all leftists ignorant? Your reasoning is very similar to the fascist-stalinists. 2) "Of course, what fascism actually is, glues completely beyond their intelectual capacity of understanding." Again, you evidence your stalinist-fascist conviction. You divide people between them, ignorant and without comprehension capacity, and us (represented by you), wise and with the greatest capacity for understanding. 3) "And to understand that communism and fascism are basically the same thing, well, that of course would blow their mind." One again, you confirm your ideology and conviction. The others, don´t understand what is correct, what you understand, consequently, they are idiots. You could have refuted the theses of the English historian, but apparently it was easier for you to make your own speech to pose as a wise man. Puedes bien responder en español. Aunque es mi tercer idioma nativo, me siento seguro como el que más, para discutir y debatir en el idioma de Cervantes.
XavierFernández En ningún momento me atribuido ser sabio. No ser tan ignorante como para decir que Friedman, Mises, Hayek y Rand son fascistas dista mucho de ser suficiente como para ser sabio. Y escribir en inglés en un foro español ... en fin, me culpo de perder el tiempo.
@@enricolucarelli816: Escribir en inglés en cualquier foro es absolutamente pertinente y apropiado, pues el idioma inglés, es, se quiera o no, el idioma universal.
@@enricolucarelli816: Yo he citado el profesor e historiador inglés Alan Bullock. Tú puedes bien refutar sus tesis, si crees que es un ignorante y si tienes conocimientos para hacerlo. Tal vez podrías mencionar las tesis de la Escuela Económica (Ideológica) Austriaca que han sido sometidas a algún principio (científico) de falsabilidad y se ha demostrado que son fiables y se pueden aplicar en cualquier país o países. La tesis principal de tus gurús, "el orden espontáneo que regula el mercado" es para mí, tan creíble como escuchar a un mago en la radio.
Excelente ponencia
Gracias, cien onzas de oro, de gracias por tomarse el tiempo de subir estos vídeos y difundirlos. 👍
Excelente video, Hayek uno de los grandes pensadores.
"Hayek uno de los grandes pensadores" chocolate por las noticias...
Gracias
Luces!! 🎉🎉
donde puedo encontrar esos discursos de hayek ??
Eduardo Durán muchas de estas cosas están en sus libros bro
puntualmente lo de la religion lo habla mucho en la fatal arrogancia. Donde habla de la religion tradicional y plantea incluso como el socialismo entra en categoria de religion. pero sobre como hay que llevarse bien, por lo menos no TENEMOS que llevarnos mal con los religiosos lo explica en la segunda mitad de libro
"The industrialists, and so called liberal economists and conservative circles always open the door to all brown dictatorships. We are talking about a political-ideological relationship, and sometimes an identity. Of course, not all liberals are fascists, but Friedman, Mises, Hayek and Rand were quite close to fascist thinkers. Hayek, the iconic economists at the Austrian Economic School, admired and support Hitler for the economic model, because it was extremely liberalized and the dictatorship was then apologized by seeing the dictatorship as a transitional phase for the truly liberal society, much like Marxists see the dictatorship of the proletariat as a transitional phase to the classless society. Alan Bullock : "Hitler: A Study in Tyranny.”
XavierFernández that’s the problem with ignorance, and the leftist tend to be real champions in this regard. Thus, they are incapable to see much more complexity but the two sides of a coin: if you are not leftist, you are fascist. 🤪 Of course, what fascism actually is, glues completely beyond their intelectual capacity of understanding. And to understand that communism and fascism are basically the same thing, well, that of course would blow their mind
@@enricolucarelli816: 1) "That’s the problem with ignorance, and the leftist tend to be real champions in this regard. Thus, they are incapable to see much more complexity but the two sides of a coin: if you are not leftist, you are fascist. Well! Your reasoning is exactly like the ideology you supposedly are denying. I ask you. Are all leftists ignorant? Your reasoning is very similar to the fascist-stalinists.
2) "Of course, what fascism actually is, glues completely beyond their intelectual capacity of understanding." Again, you evidence your stalinist-fascist conviction. You divide people between them, ignorant and without comprehension capacity, and us (represented by you), wise and with the greatest capacity for understanding.
3) "And to understand that communism and fascism are basically the same thing, well, that of course would blow their mind." One again, you confirm your ideology and conviction. The others, don´t understand what is correct, what you understand, consequently, they are idiots.
You could have refuted
the theses of the English historian, but apparently it was easier for you to make your own speech to pose as a wise man.
Puedes bien responder en español. Aunque es mi tercer idioma nativo, me siento seguro como el que más, para discutir y debatir en el idioma de Cervantes.
XavierFernández En ningún momento me atribuido ser sabio. No ser tan ignorante como para decir que Friedman, Mises, Hayek y Rand son fascistas dista mucho de ser suficiente como para ser sabio.
Y escribir en inglés en un foro español ... en fin, me culpo de perder el tiempo.
@@enricolucarelli816: Escribir en inglés en cualquier foro es absolutamente pertinente y apropiado, pues el idioma inglés, es, se quiera o no, el idioma universal.
@@enricolucarelli816: Yo he citado el profesor e historiador inglés Alan Bullock. Tú puedes bien refutar sus tesis, si crees que es un ignorante y si tienes conocimientos para hacerlo. Tal vez podrías mencionar las tesis de la Escuela Económica (Ideológica) Austriaca que han sido sometidas a algún principio (científico) de falsabilidad y se ha demostrado que son fiables y se pueden aplicar en cualquier país o países. La tesis principal de tus gurús, "el orden espontáneo que regula el mercado" es para mí, tan creíble como escuchar a un mago en la radio.