Review: SilverFire Hunter biomass stove field tested (2 of 3)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 1 окт 2024
  • The only real test of an outdoor product is to use it outside, under field conditions. Recently, I took a SilverFire Biomass cookstove to a Boy Scout camp and used it to cook several very different items. The stove worked great, even though I deliberately misused it. Check out the review!

Комментарии • 6

  • @oldtimerlee8820
    @oldtimerlee8820 11 лет назад +1

    Thanks for sharing review. Debating between the SilverFire Hunter & Survivor. Want them both! :-)
    You didn't break Hunter "rules"! Used outdoors, no problem using it as you did.
    Indoors, having burn chamber sealed, as with the wok, makes sure smoke & carbon monoxide are drawn outdoors by the flu. (Whether using a tent jack or through a house window.)
    Appears, too, that covering burn chamber with tight fitting pan, affects draft, therefore affects burn rate of fuel. Slower when covered.

  • @SouthWestWildernessScotland
    @SouthWestWildernessScotland 11 лет назад +1

    Good looking stove and it seems to work very well. Atb Glenn.

  • @WayneMeador
    @WayneMeador 11 лет назад +1

    Very cool review...thanks for putting it through it's paces for us! Wayne

  • @exotika1301
    @exotika1301 10 лет назад

    But how do you add fuel to the fire without taking away the cook pan, pot, or grill to add biomass in the top. All I saw was an air vent below. Did I miss something? So seems like an incomplete review, imho, or maybe I don't have any survival sense to understand.

    • @survivalcommonsense
      @survivalcommonsense  10 лет назад +1

      You can't add fuel without removing the pan or pot. I didn't find that to be a problem at all.

    • @THEfromkentucky
      @THEfromkentucky 10 лет назад +1

      He said the fuel load burned for almost 2 hours.