3D Printing the Innovative CFM RISE Demonstrator

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 16 июл 2022
  • The innovative open fan design of the CFM RISE* demonstrator now has a 3D printed model, thanks to engineer and 3D printing enthusiast Alex Hills.
    See what we are doing today for the benefit of us all tomorrow:
    blog.geaviation.com/farnborou...
    *CFM is a 50/50 joint business between Safran Aircraft Engines and GE.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 70

  • @hypercomms2001
    @hypercomms2001 Год назад +13

    It is good to see that GE did not give up on their UDF work that they did back in the 1980s... and finally it has a chance to see commercial implementation....

    • @hypercomms2001
      @hypercomms2001 Год назад +1

      One change I see is they did away with the counter rotating prop-fan and gear box, and instead have blades that can change the direction of the prop fan wash…

    • @RaJ2986
      @RaJ2986 4 месяца назад

      glad im not the only one who thought of the UDF when i saw this

  • @warrenbarnes6629
    @warrenbarnes6629 Год назад +5

    Great work Alex!

  • @diamondbreak
    @diamondbreak Год назад

    Look forward to seeing the testing.

  • @zhengweiwang6235
    @zhengweiwang6235 Год назад +21

    where to download STL files?

  • @WildWildWeasel
    @WildWildWeasel Год назад +3

    The spiritual successor to the mighty GE UDF

  • @Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P
    @Hey_MikeZeroEcho22P Год назад +3

    SUPER!!!!
    Can you print a 1/144 scale engine????!!!!
    Great Work, Alex Hills!!!

  • @joachims.8084
    @joachims.8084 Год назад

    Wow !

  • @dr.strangelove7739
    @dr.strangelove7739 Год назад

    Cant wait until its on commercail aircraft. We have not made any major technological advancements on jet engine design in more than 50 years. We make them more efficient and faster, but the platforms are the same since 1st gen engine designs. Looking forward to seeing innovation in aerospace powerplant design...

  • @fredclarke801
    @fredclarke801 Год назад

    FANtastic! (LOL) Strange how the blades seem to be set at the wrong angle @ 0:05 and are rotating the wrong way. A front shot later shows the same rotation and looks okay.
    Regarding fuel saving, what was wrong with doing that years ago, even though fuel was cheap? 20% saving was still worth having whenever.

  • @davidperry4013
    @davidperry4013 Год назад

    I would love to fly on an MD80X with CFM RISE engines.

  • @suchhun
    @suchhun Год назад

    What the difference between this and any other turboprop

  • @SubtractZero
    @SubtractZero Год назад +1

    Um... don't these need Kevlar cowlings to make sure the blades don't break off and penetrate the aircraft structure?
    Are they "gearing down" these engines to keep the blades from creating the noise of the previous iteration of this idea?

    • @fredclarke801
      @fredclarke801 Год назад

      Yes I believe they is a reduction gear employed.

  • @davidcerven5072
    @davidcerven5072 11 месяцев назад +1

    Where can I find STL files for 3D printing ?

  • @cupofjoen
    @cupofjoen Год назад +5

    So the whole plot was, instead of sending cease and desist letter and copyright infringement charge. They decided to recruit this guy? lol

    • @electrolove9538
      @electrolove9538 Год назад +2

      Pretty hilarious video tbh 😂. Not something I would be bragging about if I were GE. I think he was already a GE engineer? But the fact GE had to rely on some random guy to do a rush prototype model for them speaks volumes to the organization LOL wow. I am rooting for the Rise tho!!! Turned down an offer from Pratt & Whitney years ago due to a similarly sketchy feeling from their managers...maybe this is par for the course in the engine industry.

  • @seanavery7265
    @seanavery7265 Год назад +2

    Dear GE ,boom supersonic are looking for a new engine.what about taking the core of a leap and putting two carbon fiber fans in the front steam.?that's what I would go for .✈️

    • @buyerattorney599
      @buyerattorney599 Год назад

      Sean Waste of your Time !!! No One is Offering Engine to Boom Aerospace they already DOOMed and reason in Boeing, they will not allow to emerge competitor to them. Remember what happen to aerion supersonic, and Zunum Aerospace they were killed

  • @jacoblathrop1835
    @jacoblathrop1835 Год назад +3

    So we’re going back to prop fans? OK with it.

  • @artus198
    @artus198 Год назад +3

    Question: In open fan architecture, how do the fan blades remain protected from outside elements, object hits etc ?

    • @ToolofSociety
      @ToolofSociety Год назад +4

      Same way propellers do.

    • @artus198
      @artus198 Год назад

      @@ToolofSociety - so why do we even need a Casing for Jet liner engines today ?

    • @ToolofSociety
      @ToolofSociety Год назад +2

      ​@@artus198 The casing is a result of how high bypass turbofans have evolved. The compressor blades used in a modern high bypass turbofan spin at a much faster RPM than the RISE design. The blades of the compressor are also much slimmer and made of different materials than the RISE. The casing is more of a duct really with enough reinforcement to handle some blades being chucked off the compressor at higher RPM.
      If it helps you any think of the RISE as a higher speed turboprop design..I know it overly simplifies what is going on but it's the same protection. I for one will be looking forward to actually seeing one in action before I made judgements.

    • @artus198
      @artus198 Год назад

      @@ToolofSociety - Can the Rise Engine reach 0.85 MACH ?

    • @cedricfranzen8558
      @cedricfranzen8558 11 месяцев назад

      @@artus198 probably not. But it’s a mood point anyway, since both Airbus and Boeing NB cruise at m0.8 or less. Typically more like .76-.78

  • @tong.clement
    @tong.clement Год назад +3

    Is the rise engine safe as I am worried if a no gear landing is performed, will the props shatter into the pieces and kill people

    • @GhostOO9
      @GhostOO9 Год назад +1

      Check the mounting location

    • @boyteebah3794
      @boyteebah3794 Год назад +1

      🤣🤣🤣… GE needs to do a Hazop study and consider such scenario

    • @stefanweilhartner4415
      @stefanweilhartner4415 Год назад

      the blades are very light and the fan speed is very low

    • @HrishikeshMagdum
      @HrishikeshMagdum Год назад

      I think you're watching too much of final destination..

    • @JohnDoe-bd5sz
      @JohnDoe-bd5sz Год назад

      Yeah on current turbofan engines, the cowling has to be designed to contain a blade off at full throttle.
      Imagine what damage such a blade would be able to do in a blade-off situation in the air

  • @kwasiadu-amankwah7578
    @kwasiadu-amankwah7578 Год назад

    What will be the rpm of this engine

  • @GAMRMNTS2
    @GAMRMNTS2 Год назад +4

    GE Stands for Goat Engines 🐐

  • @beachboardfan9544
    @beachboardfan9544 Год назад +8

    Thought nasa tried these back in the 80 and decided they were too noisy?

    • @yoog
      @yoog Год назад +3

      GE and CFM had one In the 80s and same as NASA decided it was pointless. To loud in the cabin

    • @beachboardfan9544
      @beachboardfan9544 Год назад +3

      @@yoog So whats the scoop with CFM repeating history?

    • @mmontalvan1848
      @mmontalvan1848 Год назад +1

      They have static fan blades in the back that can change angles to help solve that issue.___.

    • @beachboardfan9544
      @beachboardfan9544 Год назад

      @@mmontalvan1848 Stators?

    • @yoog
      @yoog Год назад +1

      @@mmontalvan1848 thay would be stators not fan blades. Or even fan exit gide vains. But I don't see it doing much for noise abatement.

  • @toddwolfe6867
    @toddwolfe6867 Год назад

    From a safety standpoint, I have serious questions about this engine and it's unducted fan.
    First, General Aviation understands the dangers of working around propeller aircraft, but now commercial ground personnel are going to be working around congested fast paced airport environments and all it takes is one incident of someone rushing and losing their situational awareness because of airline schedule pressures to cause a major catastrophe.
    Second, ducted fan engines have a safety feature in that the fan duct is rated to contain any fan blades failures so if a fan were to come apart in flight, odds are nothing would penetrate the pressure vessel (fuselage). Not so with this new design.
    Call me crazy, but I am not a "fan" of this new design.

  • @ethanspaziani1070
    @ethanspaziani1070 6 месяцев назад

    Didn't they already design and build these and give up on them because they were too loud

  • @fal218
    @fal218 Год назад

    You will compensate airlines and passengers billions of dollars but brilliant idea 😅

  • @finnwolff7759
    @finnwolff7759 Год назад +1

    second

  • @sachiootsuka
    @sachiootsuka Год назад +1

    first

  • @Shadow_of_STLKR
    @Shadow_of_STLKR Год назад

    Much talking, but no real simulations etc Stop Hyping show some resoults.

  • @illusion7951
    @illusion7951 Год назад

    But the engine is ugly

  • @asharma9345
    @asharma9345 Год назад +4

    What is new here ?
    GE and PW already made and tested such Engines in 1990s.
    Search Propfan.
    Failed due to High Noise and Blade tip losses.

    • @asharma9345
      @asharma9345 Год назад +3

      I highly suggest,
      you look into Geared or Semi geared fan,
      and if possible the main fan be covered by Smaller ducts,
      With stator vanes.

    • @BlackElf94
      @BlackElf94 Год назад +1

      There have been a LOT of advancements in computational fluid dynamics and other computer modeling methods to reduce blade tip losses through complex blade geometries while also cutting down noise

    • @vince4876
      @vince4876 Год назад +1

      you know that is tested in 90s right? and what year now is? yes 2022

    • @mr.framar0t339
      @mr.framar0t339 Год назад

      1990 and 2022 are different years, Fool

    • @buyerattorney599
      @buyerattorney599 Год назад +1

      Old is always GOLD GE's Engineering Team in 1990 was much Skilled than today

  • @robertojuarez959
    @robertojuarez959 Год назад +1

    It's a real shame, it would have been incredible and interesting to travel on a plane with engines of this type, hopefully one day planes with this type of engine can be manufactured and enjoy traveling on them 🤔😔🤩😍🌎✈️🛫🛬🗺️🌐 🏝️🧳💺.