Anti-Trans Ideology Threatens All Of Our Freedoms | Judith Butler Meets Ash Sarkar
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 май 2024
- For a special edition of Downstream IRL, Ash Sarkar is joined by philosopher, author, and one of the world's most cited academics, Judith Butler.
Their new book, 'Who’s Afraid of Gender' charts how a transphobic moral panic morphed into an all-our war on so-called ‘gender ideology’.
Together, Ash and Judith explore how Britain became TERF island, the limits of self-identification, and what really defines a woman.
00:00 Intro
02:27 What is a Woman?
07:19 What’s the Deal with UK Transphobia?
15:51 Aren’t Transphobes Just Defending Vulnerable Women?
25:03 Self Identification
37:42 Does Self ID Apply to Race?
44:03 What About our Aging Populations?
47:24 Gender Ideology and Fascism
Novara Live broadcasts every weekday from 6PM on RUclips and Twitch.
Episodes of Downstream are released Sundays at 3PM on RUclips.
__________________________
Support our journalism by buying Novara Media merch:
shop.novaramedia.com
Donate one hour’s wage per month, or whatever you can afford:
novara.media/support
I'd love Ash to interview Helen Joyce or better still a conversation between Butler and Joyce.
Yes, please! 😂
They don’t dare, it would result in Butler looking even more ridiculous than she is on her own.
No not Joyce. I think Kathleen Stock is a better debater.
Yep
no? we do not debate with fascists.
I started watching this interview live with my Mum and Dad at their house yesterday. We didn't get to far into it, not because it is complicated, with many moving parts and different levels, which it is, and which it has, but because it kicked off a long discussion after only a several minutes in. They have invited me back over today to watch some more, and i get a free home cooked dinner too.
So very interesting, socially consequential, and with a high positive utility margin for me, so far.
Meanwhile Britain is doing genocide in Gaza
a free dinner cooked by a loving parent is not to be sniffed at! lucky you! ;)
@@atee876 its true and I got two of 'em.
I still haven' got any further though the interview. But an odd thing is, my feminist colleague doing post grad stuff after finishing, went from theory to praxis, and gave a me a pile of her feminists texts to add to my home library between my epistemology and logic sections. They are fairly recent general texts and collections of essays mostly. The thing is, Judith Butler is not even in most of them, and is only a couple of quotes in the one that mentions bodies. I mean I'm all for privileging margins, but really?
So i read all i have of Judith Butler in books in five minutes. Thing is i went full Butlerian for some years from late 2000's though to early 2010s. All the EGS seminars and lectures some I watched several times, and many other lectures too. So right now I thought I'd have a go at performing Butler and then return to this interview and write about it after some praxis and experience. Just don't tell my friends on the right and my conservative colleagues.
You can assess this already in comments on a Konstantin Kisin talk at Centre for Independent Study 2 weeks ago. For praxis reasons I choose to omit any reference to Butler, until I've drawn them in.
Butler is a master of denial in every possible direction. A woman runs away from truth
you maybe are an afraid person and you think there's a "truth" as if universal view could be
"Are we bringing vibes to a gun fight" is such an iconic line and the perfect way to express that sentiment 😂
Means nothing
How insulting, my womanhood is biological and not because of my presentation
mine isn't
@@chrono4998 is your womanhood constructed?
There is no right or left when it comes to what is a woman. Adult human female.
Why not get Hilary Cass involved next time you sit down for a cosy chat. She might introduce some reality into the conversation.
Yeah, lets invite a person that ignores 98% of all studies available on trans healthcare for their review and then even backpaddles on the report. Not even going into the bias she obviously has...
@@sodaaccount Oh really? What's your basis for saying that?
@@davidwarden4974 Reality? Just read the "report" and you know what I mean. It is clearly disclosed that 101/103 (EDIT: iirc) studies were excluded because they were "weak". Some of those weak studies were used anyway as they painted a transphobic picture, LOL.
As to her backpaddling, she gave an interview to the Kite Trust. There she acknowledged that it would be inhumane to conduct double blind studies on trans people (the reason they declared 98% of all studies as weak). “In the data the Cass Review examined, the most common age that trans young people were being initially prescribed puberty suppressing hormones was 15. Dr. Cass’s view is that this is too late to have the intended benefits of suppressing the effects of puberty and was caused by the previous NHS policy of requiring a trans young person to be on puberty suppressing hormones for a year before accessing gender affirming hormones. The Cass Review Report recommends that a different approach is needed, with puberty suppressing hormones and gender affirming hormones being available to young people at different ages and developmental stages alongside a wider range of gender affirming healthcare based on individual need.”
@@davidwarden4974my reply got hidden for some reason. If you sort by newest you will find it.
You mean the Hillary Cass that just recinded positions that her report said?
"Are we bringing vibes to a gunfight" :) Ash is well on form, brilliant.
We must keep plugging away, coalitions are the only thing that works against fascism. 💜
Happy Trans Day of Visibility.
i loved that lol
I'm gonna steal that.
What does it mean?
@@uncoiledfish2561 "are we focused so much on feelings and ideas that we are unequipped to deal with the material consequences of transphobia?"
Judith Butler's views on gender are part of the reason why we are in a mess as a society today.
No they aren't.
Gender nonconformity is always used as a scapegoat when society is a mess, but gender nonconformity has always been a part of human nature, it's nothing new.
You're just falling for tired old propaganda.
I think you missed the point where she said that that's the narrative that is being pushed so that you blame other struggling people for low pay and shitty living conditions
lol because society's always been neat and tidy
@@chrisharvey7461 It wasn't neat or tidy but it was never this absurd with so much cultural degeneration.
@@Inquiringmind0 “cultural degeneration”. lmao are you lost
Just from the start she is gaslighting us. "What is a woman" - the "stays in the kitchen" was never part of definition of what woman is. There was an expectation in some societies that presupposed certain role for a woman, but woman itself was still the same. Adult human female. You do not need to say how long hairs she happen to have, what she likes to do and what she has to do to make clear definition what that word means. In all languages around the world at least to my current knowledge. Feminist changed what role woman can choose for herself, but didn't changed the definition or meaning of the word woman.
Exactly
💯
Succinctly and eloquently stated!!
Her 20 minute bout of logorrhea when asked, ‘what is a woman’, was just an embarrassment of pseudo intellectual transcendental nonsensical word salad.
Butler seems to not be able to comprehend it's imperative for women's rights to differentiate between "a woman can be everything" and "everything can be a woman". The former opens the world for women, the later puts us back in the box, because for any concept to be meaningful, there has to be a coherent definition behind it. If that definition isn't grounded in biology - such as a woman is a woman because of her biology as a woman no matter what she looks like, does, says, etc. then what is a woman? By Butler's words, if anyone can become a woman, then for women to be anything at all, you have to fall back on stereotypes or just erase the concept completely, because there is no inherent concept to step into.
A trans woman is a trans woman by approximating the concept of womanhood, but they inherently can't enter biological womanhood. By this same token Butler is suggestion, what is the limitation to womanhood? Because any concept has a limitation for it to have a meaning. It's actually by far easier by her logical than any patriarchal one to limit women from the concept of womanhood through their behavior, looks, words, because if they no longer are defined as women by their biology then they can be excluded from it by any other concept.
Precisely
I came here to take a deeper look into pro trans trans movement and I listened for 19 minutes and 44 seconds, and Butler hasn't directly answered a single question! Everything that comes out of her mouth is twisted.
There is no logic to the pro-trans movement, in fact when faced with logic it withers up and dies.
The entire movement is twisted
@@urbansetter1 thats the entire point of the theory. Sometimes also called "sophistry"
The problem here is that some things are quite complicated, you see
To post-modern thinkers, everything -- and I mean EVERYTHING -- is relative.
Thank you Ash, fantastic to see such in-depth discussion around freedoms 🤩
I love Judith Butler & Ash was a perfect interviewer 🫶🏽
It's not freedom, it's slavery. The first step, preparation. If you don't see it, I am very sorry.
You ask excellent questions. :)
The onslaught of gender ideology is a threat to women more than men and it makes me sad to see women seeming to back it to the hilt. Id love to see how they dealt with Helen Joyce.
The protracted bloviation is strong with Judith
5:26 Femininsts keeping the question open - I dont think femininsts ever debated what a women was? At least not in the main stream. There was an understanding that women exist and the question was around what is their role and what are their limits in society? with the intension of expanding that range. With respect to broadened the category they ask "why stop here?" The response is "why not stop here?" Every category must have a limit. An all encompasing category has no meaning. The the question really is where is the end point for that category?
Great interview. Thank you Ash for always asking the right questions. Never really heard Judith Butler speak before - only knew their name from all the tansphobia panic, great to see they were not snide or cruel to anyone and answered every question with intelligence. Look forward to reading their book.
Butler is really a good academic and a decent person. The transpanic will only subside with more calm conversations: share this widely, please. 💜
The problem is that even when we are polite, transphobes will spin it any way they can unless peoppe take the time to watch videos like this, and most right wingers don't watch this channel unfortunately, because it'd pretty leftist
When she said that she doesn't understand any of the gener crtitical stuff, I thought "I'm not surprised". One needs a functioning, open, and not ideologically corrupted mind for that
Well said!
It doesn’t even require an open mind. Just common sense.
@@dewilew2137 absolutely
An absolute charlatan posing as an intellectual. Continental philosophy after Nietzsche had taken an incredible nosedive.
I'm glad to see that someone here can see through her!
Judith Butler is a veteran and well respected feminist. You not agreeing with her does not negate that.
@@sarah-janelambert8962 Her framing of feminism in this is absurd.
@@sarah-janelambert8962 Putin is a veteran and well respected Russian politician. Must be a great guy, then...
@@jamakaya1332 It is my experience that the majority of single issue GC campaigners are not in fact feminists of any kind. I am a second wave feminist from the 1980s onwards and biological essentialism was never a part of our feminism.
You were asked whether you could define in good faith what a woman. After 12 minutes of nonsense your answer was... "why define a woman". Am so pleased Judith that you don't build bridges...
would love to know what your definition of a woman is without resorting to a circular definition, i.e relying on “adult female” to save you
LOL, "adult human female" IS the definition of the word "woman". Nothing circular about it. Read a book - the dictionary.
@@sillyguy951 the words "adult" "human" "female" dont need "woman" to be defined so its not circular
Adult human female is not a circular definition for woman.
@@dakinichick yeah that's a very simple and clear definition. but go read the definition of "female" on dictionary and say farewell to all the simplicity.
Perfect example that academics should not be taken at a face value... What a shitshow
Fascinating conversation - thank you...
☝️😎
Thank you! Both of you so much
Butler is so condescending.
I came to hear garbage and I wasn't disappointed.
This is great and really informative just the sort of thing Novara needs to do
like a surprising number of middle-aged alternative people, I wasn't particularly open to new ideas on gender. My children told me just to sit down and watch a bit of Judith and maybe eat a biscuit. Over time, I was able to understand a little better. I would really recommend Judith Butler and Biscuits approach, rather than massively freaking out and radicalising yourself on Twitter because a thing has happened that you don't understand.
Thank you Jane, for being considerate :)
I think that's a good approach, I think that's what my parents did as well after I came out
Obviously you don’t understand basic biology. Please study what exactly Postmodernism is. Then you will understand what reality bending Butler does.
@@PattisKarriereKarten We're all biology experts here, didn't you know? Elon has now insisted that all Blue Tick Twitter Accounts prove their expertise in biology and pass an ELON MANDATED BIOLOGY TEST and produce an inexpensive CERTIFICATE before being allowed to scream abuse at trans people!
That's an interesting way to characterise feminists objecting to, for example, convicted rapists in women's prisons. They are being hysterical, whereas you are, quite reasonably, outsourcing your politics to your children. And there are only people, by the way. There isn't an "alternative" to that.
Glad you understood something from her explanation of what a woman is, other than “nothing.”
Bless you Ash Sarkar for your advocacy and integrity. And big love to Judith Butler too of course! I think their insights around gender are getting sharper every time they speak.
Butler emphasizes coalitions against fascism that uses fear of their own stuff being taken away to get people to agree to giving up human rights for everyone. More healthcare, more social agency, more history, more work, more funding, more art, more science research happens with equity and inclusion.
Everyone else stopped being interested in gender stereotypes in about 1950 but Judith's still trying to put us in little boxes
@@ayeright320 That seems like such a strange perspective to me. Do you have a concrete example of Butler’s gender stereotyping?
@@B99994 C'mon you only have to go about 5 mins through the interview to get to the first example. That's just being lazy...
@@alst4817 Can you be more specific? Clearly I wasn’t watching closely enough.
I love how Judith asks for statistics for the risk of having trans women in women’s jail, but gets to just infer what would happen if a trans woman is in a man’s jail “we all know what would happen”. You showed your inconsistency but get to breeze right past it.
They have protection wings for vulnerable or at risk inmates, men's prisons aren't safe for many men, do they all get to go to the women's prison too?
Funny you NEVER hear of Transmen going into men's prisons.
It is the most bizarre thing to have feminists advocating for men over actual women.
She mouths contradictions continually and seems oblivious. No intellectual rigor to her thinking at all.
The risk of having trans women in women's prison is lower for women than the risk for trans men if they are in men's prison, but that's just because of numbers. With transwomen in women's prison, we have a low number of transwomen compared to women while with transmen at men's prison, we would have a high number of men compared to a low number of transmen. Basically, a rabbit is in less danger if there are 100 rabbits and 1 fox in a forest than if there are 1 rabbit and 100 foxes. That does not remove the danger however, it just means it's lower than it could have been.
I watched this video with an open mind but after finishing this one hour interview, I could say that Butler is “The Queen of Word Salad”. Loads of word salad when the answer can be said in three sentences max. Let alone that most of her answers are descriptive instead of fully addressing the main question. Also you can tell that she doesn’t know what the position of her opponents are. Take for example that Gender Critics actually ENDORSE ‘Gender nonconforming’ and many of them are. Butler is the prophet of poststructuralism, which is illogical, incoherent, and in practice very anti-science.
She is also immersed in a world of conjuring enemies where things are purely black and white. It closes the door for any possible self-criticism and self-reflection within this paranoiac movement she wants to create.
I came in here with an open mind, too- well, as open as I can allow lest my brains fall out.
That one hour is enough to be fully convinced that Gender Theory/Ideology has no leg to stand on.
I can watch debates from the Gender Critics for hours and be enriched with their coherence and rationality. I‘ve always wondered why she has not been on a debate, now I know why. She knows she‘s a fraud.
We were more progressive by the late 90s than we are today, transgender ideology is regressive and confining with it's labels. Watching this was tough.
I appreciate this interview. It was nice to listen to. Unscripted academics can be a little bit difficult to follow for someone that's never been in that community but I thought everyone did a fantastic job.
This woman's brain is so addled. Gender simply identifies a human being's sex. It has nothing to do with socially perceived activities. They have had to change the entire language used in order to make a case for quite frankly, nothing. Male and Female is all that is relevant
One of the best interviews with Judith I have seen. She is comfortable and able to explain the broader way of thinking, not have to defend or attack an arguement
She sneers that her opponents haven't done their homework about what they're criticizing but then demonstrates she has no idea about the substance of their criticisms. Unbecoming and sloppy.
When have you ever seen her defend an argument in a situation where her nonsense is actually challenged?
Judith is the epitome of sophistry
@@umamicashflow1809 "She sneers"? Really? You might be projecting.
@@raincadeify "Sneers" was used metaphorically to indicate the arrogance of the behavior that was the subject of my comment. Funny how you completely ignored its substance to nitpick its vocabulary. Very Butlerian.
I tried but this was too ridiculous for me.
How so? Butler comes across as rational and well spoken here.
@@vishalcain It's because it makes less than no sense. It's one constant strawman from the start.
@@vishalcain😂😂
That’s because you have more sense than these people. I’m proud of you, and you should be proud too. 💗
Same. Butler and Sarkar are as ridiculous as each other.
Within a couple of minutes of starting this she makes a comment about "gender non conforming uncle" - that can only mean something if she had a stereotype in mind. Everything she talks about is with reference to stereotypes - that's all gender is a collection or old fashioned stereotypes.
How so? Is gender-nonconforming uncle a stereotype? I've never heard it.
And trans ideology is strengthening those stereotypes.
@@milascave2What is he not conforming with?
@@Qq-xs1fzfor sure. Tomboys are now trans. It has taken us back to the 60s
@@milascave2 A gay uncle (an effeminate gay uncle;. not complicated at all; obvious)
A great discussion. I do feel the question about whether self ID applied to race wasn't satisfactorily answered though. The reality at the moment is that there are very few examples of people wishing to identify as a different race as compared to gender. But I imagine this was the case with gender in the past. How do we know the feeling of being a different race isn't currently being suppressed, and would we accept it in the future if the numbers identifying as a different race increased?
You give that a go and see how it works out for you
Please invite some educated pushback, as the debate is not simply "Butler is correct on gender".
Listening to Butler is always a treat, but when the interviewer is super excited and having a great time, it’s even better!
You don't like your pope being challenged?
You need to get out more
Aren't your gender ideology legitimizing male voilence towards women in sports? And sexual voilence in prison? Or is that not relevant now that me changed the categories? What about social contagion? Ever wondered if spreading the gospel so intensely could affect kids that are very suggestionable?
They don’t give a shit about any of these things.
In today's society there are very few expections of how a boy or girl should act or represent their gender.
what is “expection”?
@@expedition346 A typo.
What a great conversation. Challenging, informative inspirational and importantly a lot of fun too! Well done Ash and Judith. ✊🏼
This such an excellent & accessible interview/conversation full of commonsense, intelligence and sprinkled with wonderful humour. Definately a delight.
Commonsense?? What is a woman - waffle waffle waffle nonsense.... Still no answer....
False equivalence: transphobia and anti semitism being linked…brutal
When a person replies to a question with the phrase "it depends who's asking.." ok.. Dear they, reality is hard for you
Words contain meaning and are filled with conotations. If a judge asks you if you like children, he could mean if you are pedophile, but asking the same from parents, is more like smalltalk about family, etc.
Transphobes use that, as she clearly describes in the talk, that its used to discredit people that feel unomfortable giving a clear answere, because they dont want to exclude trans people.
Others use that to try and better understand a topic.
The goal is different, so the answere should be different to.
@@v_6302 the answer is clear, and people avoid giving it because men aren't women so transwomen are men.
Was so glad I got to attend this, Judith was great and I got to ask them a Q at the end - thanks for hosting :-)
I'm a bit disappointed that we didn't get to hear any audience questions 😔
Also, jealous! 😁
Likely questions weren't included bc of sound/no mic or no signoff of permission when audience came in to release their image use. (I'm an AV tech, that's the 2 most common reasons especially for early sessions and small orgs.) Audience: always eat the mic with your question and offer to sign a release or it won't be used in videos.
@@alioxinfree Bit of a shame about the mic feedback in this, huh? I didn't want to moan about it, but come on, it's Judith Butler! Get the tech shit together!
She talks absolute nonsense that would fall apart on the first challenge. No way she is taking questions
@@ayeright320 They did though.
Bravo ash, brilliant interview
Judith Butler proves that any idiotic ideology can always be backed up with seemingly plausible rationalizations that a lot of otherwise well meaning and highly educated and intelligent people will fall for.
Novara Media, which otherwise does a lot of good journalism, should know better.
It’s interesting how many times reinforcement of societal gender norms was confirmed in this conversation.
It's accessible. And everyone needs a jumping off point that is grounded in their reality. I myself appreciated some simple anchors. Given at the end you reflect on it, but the fight isn't for ground zero on social identity. Its about taking ground back from ignorance.
You don't teach math with algebra. You start with the numbers.
@@philsanders9625Then why not start with biological reality rather than the seemingly idosyncratic social norms that have developed over the course of millenia?
Then you might learn why those social norms exist in the first place, and thereby learn why it's idiotic to use them as a proxy for becoming the opposite sex.
@@philsanders9625 and when talking about gender and sex stereotypes, you start with the immutable nature of sex. A transwoman is only a transwoman because they are a male sexed person.
What an utter bag of hot air
Pseudo-intellectuel claptrap.
What you mean to say is you're offended by you can't explain why.
That's okay, I'll do it for you: It's because you are obedient.
@@paulsmart4672There's nothing obedient about disagreement. You seem to agree with what you have just heard. That stinks to the core of obedience, passivity, ignorance and thoughtlessness.
@@familiecole fact
@@paulsmart4672 Don't be so kind. There is ZERO intellectual value, this is as anti-intellectual as it gets.
@@paulsmart4672 Perhaps, but atleast he can string a sentence together.
listened to the whole thing but heard nothing persuasive or to convince me that anything she said was anything but waffle.
I tried. I really tried.
😅😂
i lasted 10 seconds
You shouldn't have
Brilliant. Great interview Ash and Judith❤
Among many other philosophers, I also read Judith Butler's books whilst at University more than a decade ago. Interesting, BUT, I view all philosophers' concepts as based on their life perspectives, and the world of Butler is viewed from Butler's eyes - no matter how much research and critical thinking is going on. All of Butler's points are not from true objectiveness as this is impossible to achieve. These are subjective view points and possibly begin with Butler's own childhood experiences...??? I don't disagree but I also don't agree. Interestingly, the last comment was personally telling from Butler, as it included the words Hierarchy and Oppression, so on that note, I don't want to be referred as a CIS, chest feeder, and all the other silly things...
Only through a return to a class based politics which fights for universal freedom and global solidarity can current problems, including otherness, be solved.
Congrats Ash that was a great interview!
Butler seems to not be able to comprehend it's imperative for women's rights to differentiate between "a woman can be everything" and "everything can be a woman". The former opens the world for women, the later puts us back in the box, because for any concept to be meaningful, there has to be a coherent definition behind it. If that definition isn't grounded in biology - such as a woman is a woman because of her biology as a woman no matter what she looks like, does, says, etc. then what is a woman? By Butler's words, if anyone can become a woman, then for women to be anything at all, you have to fall back on stereotypes or just erase the concept completely, because there is no inherent concept to step into.
A trans woman is a trans woman by approximating the concept of womanhood, but they inherently can't enter biological womanhood. By this same token Butler is suggestion, what is the limitation to womanhood? Because any concept has a limitation for it to have a meaning. It's actually by far easier by her logical than any patriarchal one to limit women from the concept of womanhood through their behavior, looks, words, because if they no longer are defined as women by their biology then they can be excluded from it by any other concept.
Of 129 trans identified males in UK prisons 78 are convicted sex offenders. Isn't anyone seriously worried about this? This is a much higher % than the male population.
This isn't of course to say all trans identified males are perpetrators as these are prison-specific figures.
Good to see Judith much more concerned about the welfare of men in prison than women here. Not sure which stats Ash is using here to seriously suggest that trans identified men are the most vulnerable in prison.
Ash is probably referring to PMC6830990 and or PMC10756016, which states that on many occasions that incarcerated trans women have it worse in many ways, including resource access and sexual violence inflicted onto trans women. The former also does specifically mention where error and limits can conflict with the result, which can come as an issue with the data collected.
Respectfully, I also have had many suspicions with how the data in the Parliament evidence (referring to the 78/129 statistic) referenced is collected. The pool of trans women is quite inconsistent, sometimes exceeding Prison and Probation reports on their own times, and is overly vague across the paper (of which I suspect is due to a strong emphasis on evidence collected by single-issue groups), there is too little data to make any conclusions. That's not to say this article isn't valid in all aspects, it at the very least shows that self ID access shouldn't be entirely unfettered, although it does not mean to abolish it entirely.
Source? Ya made it up.
@@brentboymebob8754There are protection wings in men's prisons where they can put men scared of other prisoners. Absolutely nothing to do with women whatsoever - not one man should be in a women's prisons don't care if they've had surgery or whatever. Not women's problem.
@ayeright320 You should look at the studies I just linked, they literally mention that protective custody is ineffective for solving the problem in it's entirety, because the prison never works in mental help, counseling, or providing medication. It's even been mentioned that prison staff of the mens prisons often discriminate against the trans women in particular.
Not to mention, excluding trans people from prisons provides more problems. Trans men also come into custody, and regardless of your thoughts on their identity, they are still masculine people that get incarcerated, and like anyone else, they can be abusive, violent, and if the law does not care about surgery, still penetrative.
@@brentboymebob8754 Prisons have better things to do than pander to these people. Everyone in prison has mental health problems no one gets fussed over because of their lifestyle choices.
Biology > Social Constructivism
Thanks so much for having this guest on. What an enlightening discussion.
Except for as usual. Jb is pretending she doesn't understand the harm that is being done to women under the guise of this change and expansion.
Yep she knows full well but it doesn't fit with her grift
i'm statistically more likely to be harmed than a cis woman. give me a break
Judith Butler has absolutely perfected never answering the question asked.
At a certain point, one has to wonder if you're even listening.
Judith is asked layered questions, which require layered responses. Having an attention span that lasts longer than three sentences really helps to parse the language she's using here.
Oh I understand what she's saying, it's just there's no substance to the answer.
@@theotherzaphriel488where is the lack of substance in the idea that cultural expectations of gender are different from the biological expectations of sex?
@@zacharybosley1935 mainly the follow through of thought. The cultural expectations of the sexes are determined by their biological contribution to the family unit and based on average physical strength. I don't see where she mentioned that they're born of actual limitations and strengths and although one size doesn't fit all, it has served a historical importance in a protection of the biological imperative.
that's because the "actual differences" don't meaningfully contribute to how those expectations are sculpted in the present day, boss. You gotta recognize that the norms of the hunter-gatherers have less than zero utility to a fully industrialized culture. Historical precedent is just as illogical as any appeal to tradition, especially when we have been re-evaluating those expectations since before first-wave feminism.
Acknowledging biological differences does not meaningfully justify the status quo.
She’s as disturbed as she is verbose.
Le preguntan que es una mujer y va al significado estetico para justificar que es cualquier cosa menos un significado biologico, es una tonteria. Entonces cualquier palabra debe de significar cualquier cosa que sentido tiene un idioma?. Pura doctrina dogmática.
words have different connotations, and in that specific example it wasnt even about the word “woman” but rather the meaning of the entire sentence “what is a woman?”
"What are they taking?"
Sports medals for a kick-off. 🤨
Oh dear. We do have a real wars going on, climate change and poverty. Could someone please try to tackle those?
That was brilliant. Lovely work, Ash x
All oppression is connected, animals also deserve liberation 🐣
A squirrel lives in my garden rent-free.
Making all oppression to be connected eliminates the significance between them.
@@chibu3212 What significance? That our capitalist imperialist or any authoritarian dictatorship depends on oppression as a feature of that system continuing?
But what *is* an animal?
@@incurableromantic4006 A creature that identifies as one is an animal. Oh wait ....
I grew up never being told what it "means" to be a man or a woman, my parents are feminists. I can't help but think that religion plays a large role in people holding onto gender roles.
But even if you weren't "told" directly, society tells us the way things are. Most learning is aquired, not instructed, such as language. You need to know that bigots, such as Richard Dawkins, also don't like transgendered and queer people. Religion has a par, but being conservative is more of a factorx and that doesn't necessarily equate religion, especially if you look outside the US. Sorry, I thought I had to add that, just saying are implicit values that we learn or aquire in society without having lessons on it.
Yes, because religion can be an expression not of spirituality but of authority. God the father, is the chief guy in charge and he must be obeyed. Faith constitutes the rules that lay down fundamental rules of being that cannot be contravened.
@@alvodin6197I bet you use the word 'bigot' a lot. Dawkins is a liberal. He's also a scientist.
@@kevinjohnson9533 religion is only ever an expression of authority. Faith is different thing altogether
@@JohnnyComelately-eb5zv He's also been roundly condemned for anti-semitism, Islamaphobia, and promoting classist eugenic ideology - as well as several pseudo-scientific ideas.
This is the part of Novara I’m not left enough for
Novara is not left enough for you on this issue.
Identity politics are the very definition of Moderate/Centrist. You are not alone brothers and sisters.
@@climaksy1659 What's the point of a Left that doesn't challenge socially constructed identities?
Ya chatting slop. Social liberalism and economic liberalism are not inseparable. In fact, social liberalism and leftist politics can be very happy bedfellows.
@@climaksy1659 Clip kicks off with Butler critiquing neoliberal and its multifarious social impacts -all fine. Then you remember they donated to Cop-ala Harris in the 2020 primary. Wendy Brown is definitely the 'based' one in that partnership.
“The most striking difference between ancient and modern sophists is that the ancients were satisfied with a passing victory of the argument at the expense of truth, whereas the moderns want a more lasting victory at the expense of reality” Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism. Butler is a Sophist personified.
It’s fascinating how criticism of Butler so rarely touches on anything they’ve written or said. Here: “Butler is a sophist.” Why? Dunno. Because you said so, I suppose.
@@sasha_something . I find it equally fascinating, that the confirmation bias, and celebration of cognitive dissonance evoked by the words of Butler is rife.. She espouses rhetoric that is at best contradictory, and at worst disingenuous, but she remains the go to figurehead when it comes to all things transgender, so much so she has made a successful career out of it. Her 1990 book, Gender Trouble as one example, introduces the now-mainstreamed (academic) concept that gender, sex, and the “category of woman” are “fluid.”
"The main conundrum faced by gender identity ideologues today (and, by proxy, women’s rights advocates), which they have refused to respond to in a cohesive way, is that, 1) If there is no concrete definition of “woman,” what is a “woman’s right”? And 2) If a woman is not a material thing, but just a vague idea, why the concerted, often violent effort to insist “transwomen are [literally] women”? What does that mean? What is a woman? And why is it important we “accept transwomen as women” (particularly if there is no such thing)? What are we accepting them as, and how does it improve a male person’s life to be “accepted as a woman”? Hence my use of Sophist to describe her.
@@rexcarrulers6504 When I clicked on this video, I was prepared to give this perspective a fair hearing. But they (plural, the two of them) lost me with the casual, group-loyalty-signaling use of the derogatory term 'terf'.
@@ronmackinnon9374terf isn't derogatory it just means trans exclusionary radical feminist
@@marcydarcie5884 “terf” is sometkmes used derogatorily
First time I've heard Judith, very impressive. How they are able to reduce a controversial & often emotive topic to simple, yet extremely focused logical propositions should be a lesson to our politicians & policy makers.
This is all waffling and sophistry. Hardly anything logical about her statement.
@@nataliekhanyola5669 Of course you can intellectualize prejudice anyway you like, to claim a persons logical world view doesn't meet your personal cultural bias, so not add up by your logic doesn't mean the other persons thinking is illogical, you just lack empathy or understanding of nuance for their particular points.
@@sophiepooks2174"you lack empathy" there you go - the ad hominem attack because this person can see what rubbish this women talks and you can't.
fantastic to watch such a thoughtful conversation between two very interesting people!
Its great when you click newest on comments, i wonder when RUclips will do away with that like the dislike to give a false representation of popular public opinion.
The newest comments also include people whos comments are later deleted because:
Unwanted commercial content or spam
Pornography or sexually explicit material
Child abuse
Hate speech or graphic violence
Promotes terrorism
Harassment or bullying
Suicide or self injury
Misinformation
Legal issue
Sure thats public opinion, but also extremist views, neutral people comment less, so get a bias.
There is a extension for the browser called "Return RUclips Dislikes". I may not agree with you on things but i still want a objective and scientific view.
_____________She never answered what a woman is.
Philosophy isn’t about answers it’s about questions
She wasn't really asked that question. The question was, "What do people mean when they ask that question?" So basically, they avoided having to define "woman."
@@mewho6199
Same thing, same answer.
Q. What is a woman? A. adult human female
Q. "What do people mean when they ask that question?" A. They're asking if you think a woman is an adult human female.
Either/or, they end up at the same thing. Her answer should have been 'They're asking if you think a woman is an adult human female."
She doesn’t know.
@@barbarasumrok8321
_______________Of course she does. Everyone knows.
17:33 is where I stopped listening, with Butler actually claiming that we terves recommend that transwomen be sexually violated, after a good ten minutes of wind to the effect that woman is a category without boundaries, with everything and nothing inside it. This particular boomer is the platonic ideal of academic insanity. Her dishonesty about the opposing side is insulting and not worth listening to behind this point.
one terf, two terves?
Well by forcing them to go in the bathroom that matches their sex instead of their gender, you are literally forcing woman into men-toilets etc.
Wich often leads to sexual violation.
One thing for the terfs (not terves):
What about trans men? They are now forced to be in womens spaces where they also dont want to be. Yes sexual assault is a lesser problem, but still you will whine. And why? Because its not about that.
@@v_6302 “Well by forcing them to go in the bathroom that matches their sex instead of their gender”. strawman. apparently no one has thought of third gender bathrooms.
“What about trans men?” no one talks about trans men because they dont pose sexual-violent threat to men; why does no one realize this?
To post-modernists, everything is relative; there is no stable meaning. It's a free pass to mouth nonsense.
First minute was really insulting. It's a bad look for someone to not engage with anything from the other side and just hand wave it away as fearmongering.
Great interview, would love to see Novara doing more of these kinds of interviews and feminist events.
This ain't feminist
@@soulfoodie1 You don't have to hatewatch RUclips.
Orwellian use of the word 'feminist.' Strange times.
@@JohnnyComelately-eb5zv there's nothing Orwellian (really you meant dystopian) about calling contemporary feminist debate, feminist.
@@moonpixelle No. I meant Orwellian. Look in a dictionary. It's Orwellian to describe a men's rights movement as feminist. Nothing to do with 'dystopia.' Although, if you have your way we may well be in a dystopia.
7:00 So after minutes of talking in circles, this expert can't define what a woman is either, and that's one of many, many problems about gender ideology. It trumps humanity and common sense. This is why the world is better without this than with it, on balance. The definition of a woman has been straightforward throughout history. Why are trans ideologues changing the definition of what a woman is and forcing others to accept it, when they can't define it themselves, and when their expanded definition of womanhood trample upon the rights of others?
Interested that the question is 'what is a woman? not 'what is a man'. Trans women are sometimes quite aggressive about their right to female identity. It's very complex psychologically, much more so than the trans rights lobby would admit.
Well, males tend to be aggressive.
Really? Judith Butler? The woman makes no sense, people, she is not capable of a coherent sentence. Do you actually expect anyone to take you seriously?
it sounded reasonable to me. but I'll watch it again..
Yet all institutions are teaching queer theory
Great interview Ash. Thank you Novara, you are all amazing ❤
😂😅😂
Ash really on it - great Qs
If Butler is in favour of unlimited migration then Butler is an unwitting supporter of the economic neoliberalism Butler affects to despise.
Great conversation. Thanks.
The answer to the question about race seems very evasive. Clearly the question threatens the whole ontology of Butler's worldview, so it is set aside with a historical argument rather than a philosophical one.
Do whatever you want when you are adult. But keep your ideology out of children's malleable minds.
pot calling the kettle black.
right back at yuou
Ever notice how Butler uses western example to highlight what needs to change. Maybe she should go to Saudi Arabia and suggest Muslim need to go through a change and come out the other side.
Reclaim feminism: this may go beyond butler's point, but to my mind along with terfs there are issues with the 'online feministas'; these folks seem to lack any sense of being self critical, oft lack in understanding that there are actually different views within feminism that don't always agree, and tend far more heavily towards the misandrist bent.
This is utter rubbish; she speaks but says nothing. Her words are nothing more than a meaningless religious chant for the faithful.
Good questions Ash, but i would like to have probed into the distinction between what someone "is" amd what someone "does". I think this is fundamental in this discussion, and without clarification it causes a circular argument e.g. "Are you a woman?" This is an 'is' question for some and a 'does' question for others.
I think one of the points made in Judith's book, Gender Trouble, is that someone's gender is the result of repeated gendered acts (hair, clothes, speech etc). So in a way it equates what people are and what they do. A bit of a chicken and egg question
Stop gas lighting us just stop its disgusting.
Also in response to the engaging population - the conversation can move from reproduction to economic reorganizing. The aging population calls capitalism into question, not reproduction or falling birth rates. As Judith said, the earth could handle less of humans.
Aging*
however, if we are to ever transition to a society based on allocation to those in need, we certainly have to consider intergenerational population proportionality, regardless of our technological level. this does not necessitate patriarchal fixation with birth rates however-we just need a certain continuity (ie no booms nor busts)
Beautiful, Judith and Ash, thanks!
two brilliant people talking! what a joy
Trans meannes online is 1,000% more than women´s. Did anyone see the insults JK Rowling received from the trans war?
Straw maaaaannnnnnnnnn. Butler has made no attempt to understand her opponents. That's a bummer, as she's quite engaging and smart.
this was a delight!
MALE AND FEMALE PERIOD
It's partly true, in biology there are mainly two sexes, though also states of intersex exist. but regarding gender, which is culturally formed in the brain, which is a very complex organ, there can potentially be more than male and female
(edit: but in the sense of biology, man is just man, woman just woman)
@@eigentlichtoll02Intersex conditions also fall within the binary of male and female
Fantastic interview and discussion ❤