@@isaiasanchez1987 Yes, the 50 will be wider, but you can get closer. It really sort of evens out. I have the F-mount 60/2.8 macro that has been a workhorse for me, so I really just need to add the 105 (for now). Tip: lighting can be easier with a longer focal length because you're not as close, and not blocking the light with your camera (and head, if handheld). 105/2.8 also makes a great portrait lens.
I have tons of 35mm negatives and slides as well as 6x6 negs I have been putting off. The 50mm looks to be the 1:1 macro I've been waiting for. Other than That, some small critters, flowers and product or food work.
The 105 is $1000, and the 50mm is $650. I think the 105 is prices extremely fair, the 50 coulda maybe been like $450-$550 since it isn't even an "S" lens.
@@Realletsplaygrey Wow, really? That's a terrible price. Are we ever going to get prime lenses as cheap as the F mount? The Z lens lineup needs lenses in the 300-400$ mark desperately.
@@TexelGuy for both? I find 1000$ fair for the 105. But yeah the 50 should be much cheaper. Their 50 1.8 should honestly be $350. I shot F mount for 8 years so I can definitely say the Z glass is a massive upgrade, but the prices shouldn't double.
they are going to release a 40mm F2 later this year. Better wait for that, will also be very compact and ligthweight. Perfect for the Z50. edit: depends on if you want a macro lens or not of course. The 40mm won't be a macro but probably 300 $ or less.
I agree with Johan. If you have enough distance between you and your models use the 105mm. It will produce a nicely compressed image with great bokeh. >Mark
The Nikkor Z MC 50mm f/2.8 would be ideal if you needed to shoot the face of the watch for example in greater detail, due to the shorter focusing distance.
Ricci Talks said he'll be doing a video on exactly this topic, comparing both of these lenses. He doesn't have the 50 yet but it's on the way (his video on the 105 is out now). I asked him if the main difference was minimum focusing distance, he mentioned there are more technicals to consider. I pre-ordered the 50 from B&H - but I might change my mind. Both have some advantages for sure.
The right choice would depend on how close you need to get to the subject. With the Z MC 50mm f/2.8, it would have a shorter focus distance which is better when you're able to get physically closer to the subject. Otherwise if the subject is a bit out of reach, the Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S would be best since it offers a longer focal length.
The Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S Macro Lens would work very well on the Nikon Z50 and is definitely worth purchasing if you're looking to shoot macro images.
@@BandH Thank you very much for your reply and clarification. I was concerned about the usability of the lens because of the crop factor resulting in a narrower field of view. Kind regards.
The Z MC 50mm f/2.8 would be most practically for its shorter focusing distance, which would be ideal if you're shooting a mix of macro images or portraits. The Z 50mm f/1.8 would be ideal if macro images are not something you're taking, but rather you're working in low light situations or needed an even shallower depth of field.
Use the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S Macro Lens B&H # NIZ10528 for more compression of the background and a greater bokeh. Use the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens B&H # NIZ5028 for less effect. >Mark
@@BandH I took it out on the 4th for a portrait shoot and now on my Z6 II the L-Fn shows up in custom controls, could have been a dirty contact, but now it is working.
ok my ONLY question, because this is the ONLY issue I have with the F mount 105. How is the focus breathing problem with the new Z 105? The F mount, while a great macro lens, suffers an INCREDIBLE amount of focus breathing to the point where a rail is almost necessary for most shots. Has there been any improvement to this in the new lenses?
Not that one needs fast AF on macro lenses, but to call the 105 macro AF “fast” is an overstatement. It’s painfully slow from what appears from this video.
The difference between 1.4:1 and 1:1 is pretty small, if something is too small for 1:1, you probably need _way_ more magnification not just a little more, and very few macro lenses do that.
@@andrzejjaniak6849 Yep, three uninspiring lenses released in the last year and a half or so. What happened to the plethora of lenses they listed in their lens roadmap a few years back. Down the memory hole ...
Pre-ordered. I've been looking forward to the macros!
What are the prices?
same! 105mm
50 or 105? I can't decide wich i want more for my macro. I'm guessing the 50 will have a wider focus area than the 105?
@@isaiasanchez1987 Yes, the 50 will be wider, but you can get closer. It really sort of evens out. I have the F-mount 60/2.8 macro that has been a workhorse for me, so I really just need to add the 105 (for now). Tip: lighting can be easier with a longer focal length because you're not as close, and not blocking the light with your camera (and head, if handheld). 105/2.8 also makes a great portrait lens.
Y
I have tons of 35mm negatives and slides as well as 6x6 negs I have been putting off. The 50mm looks to be the 1:1 macro I've been waiting for.
Other than That, some small critters, flowers and product or food work.
Same! It'll be a nice bonus to finally be able to easily convert those.
They're just to clarify you can digitize 35 mm negatives with this lens? Using the es-1 and es-2?
Beyond hyped for the 105.
Such a beauty! Awesome lineup for Z cameras❤️
Just waiting for 100-400 and/or 200-600!!
Next lens 24-105 F4 S please!!!!
24-105 f2,8 in price of f4 : )
@@pk6221 ...and in size of f4! :D Would be great... Unfortunately, rules of physics and rules of the economy are against us :/
Welp this comment aged well. 24-120 boys!
Looks sharp and contrasty these lenses.
I was wondering if I should buy the 105 mm... you've answered my question. Thanks!
I hope they're priced well, the 50mm 2.8 might be the next lens for my Z50, unless they release a DX prime later on.
The 105 is $1000, and the 50mm is $650. I think the 105 is prices extremely fair, the 50 coulda maybe been like $450-$550 since it isn't even an "S" lens.
@@Realletsplaygrey Wow, really? That's a terrible price. Are we ever going to get prime lenses as cheap as the F mount? The Z lens lineup needs lenses in the 300-400$ mark desperately.
@@TexelGuy for both? I find 1000$ fair for the 105. But yeah the 50 should be much cheaper. Their 50 1.8 should honestly be $350. I shot F mount for 8 years so I can definitely say the Z glass is a massive upgrade, but the prices shouldn't double.
@@Realletsplaygrey Yeah I meant the 50mm, the 105mm is fine, most of the S line lenses have been priced fairly for what they're capable of.
they are going to release a 40mm F2 later this year. Better wait for that, will also be very compact and ligthweight. Perfect for the Z50.
edit: depends on if you want a macro lens or not of course. The 40mm won't be a macro but probably 300 $ or less.
Hoping to catalog my diecast 1:400 scale airliner models. Which lens would be better for this macro work, 105mm or 50mm?? Will be paired with Z6II
Depends on space but if you can get far back enough the 105 would compress the image.
I agree with Johan. If you have enough distance between you and your models use the 105mm. It will produce a nicely compressed image with great bokeh. >Mark
I've been thinking about starting out macro photography of eyes. Would you say the 50mm f/2.8 would be a good pick for that?
Yes, a Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 50mm f/2.8 would be a good starting point for macro work using your Nikon Z mount camera.
@@BandH great thanks :)
Konten Anda sangat bagus, i like it...!!!👍
My froom Indonesia
Would the 50mm lens be the more appropriate choice to photograph watches?
The Nikkor Z MC 50mm f/2.8 would be ideal if you needed to shoot the face of the watch for example in greater detail, due to the shorter focusing distance.
Damn. As a Z50 user, I was all set to invest in the 105. However the 50 is just as good with some added versatility, especially for my wallet.
Great video ! I reviewed the 105 I find the stabilization very average I am disappointed
Think the 50mm macro should be ideal for the masses. The 105 is only when you require certain distance
El 50mm es genial para la Z5 pero sería interesante profundizar en la combinación de este cuerpo con el 105mm.
How do you choose between the two (seriously)? What are the primary advantages of one over the other?
Ricci Talks said he'll be doing a video on exactly this topic, comparing both of these lenses. He doesn't have the 50 yet but it's on the way (his video on the 105 is out now).
I asked him if the main difference was minimum focusing distance, he mentioned there are more technicals to consider.
I pre-ordered the 50 from B&H - but I might change my mind. Both have some advantages for sure.
@@csc-photo Cool. Thank you. I'll have a look. I'm new to macro so I appreciate the lead.
The right choice would depend on how close you need to get to the subject. With the Z MC 50mm f/2.8, it would have a shorter focus distance which is better when you're able to get physically closer to the subject. Otherwise if the subject is a bit out of reach, the Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S would be best since it offers a longer focal length.
Hello there, how well does the Z MC 105 work on the Nikon Z50 and is it worth buying it ? Thank you.
The Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S Macro Lens
would work very well on the Nikon Z50 and is definitely worth purchasing if you're looking to shoot macro images.
@@BandH Thank you very much for your reply and clarification. I was concerned about the usability of the lens because of the crop factor resulting in a narrower field of view. Kind regards.
In terms of a day-to-day use lens, how does the MC 2.8 50 compare with the Z 1.8s 50mm practically?
Seems they both have bokeh.
The Z MC 50mm f/2.8 would be most practically for its shorter focusing distance, which would be ideal if you're shooting a mix of macro images or portraits. The Z 50mm f/1.8 would be ideal if macro images are not something you're taking, but rather you're working in low light situations or needed an even shallower depth of field.
hello ,is that lens fully compatible with the z7?
Yes. Both new lenses will work well with the Nikon Z-7. >Mark
Do you note any distortion on 50mm on portraits?
There has been no report of distortion when shooting portraits with the Nikkor Z MC 50mm f/2.8.
Which is better to shoot small coins?
Use the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 105mm f/2.8 VR S Macro Lens
B&H # NIZ10528 for more compression of the background and a greater bokeh. Use the Nikon NIKKOR Z MC 50mm f/2.8 Macro Lens B&H # NIZ5028 for less effect. >Mark
What is prize ?
You can view current pricing for these lenses here: bhpho.to/3uGJebu
Why doe the L-Fn button on the Nikon 105mm f2.8 S not show up in custom controls on either the Z6 II or Z7 II (firmware is up to date).
Please e-mail us: askbh@bandh.com >Mark
@@BandH I took it out on the 4th for a portrait shoot and now on my Z6 II the L-Fn shows up in custom controls, could have been a dirty contact, but now it is working.
These lenses have been announced just this morning. How in the world did you get the lens already and made a video about it?!
Ever heard of early review copies?
@@virtualwarp lol. He was just asking an honest question. Cut him some slack. Sheesh.
@@jacksonjackson9474
I was simply answering his question.
Sheesh, cut me some slack.
Early review plus it’s B&H we’re talking about. You can bet they were sent those lenses early.
2:07 - 3:39 "Sony 105 f28" :-)
ok my ONLY question, because this is the ONLY issue I have with the F mount 105. How is the focus breathing problem with the new Z 105? The F mount, while a great macro lens, suffers an INCREDIBLE amount of focus breathing to the point where a rail is almost necessary for most shots. Has there been any improvement to this in the new lenses?
A very small amount of focus breathing has been reported by some customers and reviewers. We did not notice any in our hands-on review. >Mark
Not that one needs fast AF on macro lenses, but to call the 105 macro AF “fast” is an overstatement. It’s painfully slow from what appears from this video.
Very fast for macro class lens.
Nobody takes true macro in autofocus.
Fast lens means lower f value
He has read the brochure...
Mc 50 mm will become 75 mm on z50 DX.
He's such a hunk.
It's Zed, but sure
Hmm..being a nikon user..not impressed compared to the canon 100mm macro f2.8 with 1.4x mag.
The difference between 1.4:1 and 1:1 is pretty small, if something is too small for 1:1, you probably need _way_ more magnification not just a little more, and very few macro lenses do that.
@@-szega Thanks for sharing. 👍
$1400 vs $1k... Nikon all day :) just pre-ordered it.
Is Nikon still in business ...
Yes, and it's doing better than you think.
Sell more cameras than sony.
@@andrzejjaniak6849 Yep, three uninspiring lenses released in the last year and a half or so. What happened to the plethora of lenses they listed in their lens roadmap a few years back. Down the memory hole ...
@@ktcool4660 At least in the parallel universe in which you live ...
@@stevemckenzie4731 Facts don't care about your feelings.