If I were to guess Belarus has probably deployed more than 1/3rd to the border and with another 1/3rd within a 48 hour call up duty if an emergency was declared. I think Belarus is being defensive just to make sure there isn't a incursion. I think 12 to 15 thousand mobile fast acting ready at all times to meet any Ukrainian invading force is enough to slow down an incursion enough for the rest to be called up and for Russia to come in for help. The terrain isn't suitable for moving heavy equipment so this would mostly be done on foot.
Belarus is integrated in the armed forces of the Russian Federation. They are in union. Consider Belarus a republic of the family of nations that is Russia today. The Russian forces act freely there.
That was a good point on the Berlin wall not coming down if the Soviet Union could see the future, but that is true of all our ancestors if they could see what has become of the world. The wrong side won.
It shows 52 comments, while actually yt only shows 23. My comment was deleted even before it was posted, and comments’ counter was nit even updated, like it never happened. They’re SUCKS! 👎
You say the average suburbanite American is making a big deal about the Belarus moving towards the border but you doing the same thing with your delusional fears that Ukraine would launch an assault into Belarus. They don’t have any kind of manpower, resources, no support from their Allie’s to ever pull off such an attack. It would go literally nowhere. At this stage with all their struggles it would be hands down the biggest military blunder in history to introduce a new opponent into the fight. Not even Zelensky is that stupid.
Brilliant report I completely agree with you Belarus will get a Kursk style attack Nowhere else to escalate except perhaps Kaliningrad Perhaps both at same time
The Berlin Wall coming down was strategic for Russia as well. Look at the influence they’ve been able to openly conduct since then. Had those tensions still existed, it would have been nearly impossible to conduct the operations that they have been successful deploying. You can look at our civilization and see a distinct pivot in the years that followed. They used the weakness of capitalism (greed) to deploy communism, knowing that communism destroys countries.
I think Putin might be slow, mentally, I still like the guy but my goodness. Patient at best. Putin an Urbanite? At this point I'm wondering if Russia even has tactical nuclear weapons 😅. There will never be an end as long as "the Ukraine" continues to have hundreds and thousands of troops
What's the use for ua to intervent br? Ua automatically becomes aggressor. -Eu says we not with ua. What's the use for nato to intervent br? Nuke strikes exchange.- gg wp.
Ya, belarus has all of four regular army brigades, but as I recall, two of those brigades aren't even fully manned. Basically, belarus hardly has an army.
Where are the Ukrainians getting all these troops to remain active on all of these fronts ? And also, the Chinese army has forces deployed in Belarus, are they going to want to start a war with China ?
All you guys have said for over a year the Ukrainians are running out of soldiers. Then it would make no sense for the Ukrainians to park as you say 100,000 to 120,000 soldiers on that border. That would mean that the Russians could just park and not use three times that amount in that country. The Ukrainians need an additional 300,000 troops on the eastern front. Leaving that many soldiers unengaged would be illogical. Your numbers make no sense. I rarely find disagreement with your statements; but this overview is looking for rationale foundation.
Western sources claim that many Ukrainian soldiers on the border with Belarus. Ukraine probably uses those positions as a furlough for active troops. They’re not just sitting there camping.
Most people thought Ukraine leaders would have an ounce of sanity but they're willing to throw every single man woman and child into the grinder because they're controlled by NATO
Jesus H Crash! What are your sources for the strength of Belarus forces? Their population was one fourth that of Ukraine in 2021 and their GDP/capita 35% higher. That's very substantial considering how Ukraine is now at bay. And now they also have MASSIVE Russian military support aince a year+. They are ready to storm across the Suwalki gap to supply Kaliningrad in a WW3 scenario. "Three brigades" nonsense [UMAss]. According to reputable Wikipedia(!) Belarus could mobilize 400,000 soldiers on their own in 2017 already. It was through Belarus that the Russian dagger was thrown into the suburbs of Kiev on the very first day of the SMO. How do you imagine that they couldn't do the same on Vilnius and Gdansk tomorrow?
"According to reputable Wikipedia(!) Belarus could mobilize 400,000 soldiers on their own in 2017 already." That would be an extremely theoretical ability. They haven't spent the years since 2014 getting 30 billion$ per year in militarisation aid from EU and Nato like UA. Instead they've spent that time getting more and more sanctioned for something they had no part of and being attacked by coup attempts and various other covert warfare by the west overall and USA in particular. They can mobilise 400 thousand if they're directly attacked, yes. But until that happens, no.
@@DIREWOLFx75 I'm Swede and made my mandatory one-year conscript training as 18-19 years old in 1991/92. All able men did it during the cold war, and in the aftermath. It had been like that in all European countries since 100 years. It was taken for granted that all able young men were trained and organized into an Army (and some in the Navy and the Airforce whatnot). When the order came, one went to one's deignated mobilization site, picked up the uniform, rifle and other equipment. Met up with the comrades one had trained together with, and the platoon and company and battalion officers and went to the front. Of course! How else!?? That is the very definition of the concept MOBILIZATION! That's what conscription means. It is the last year of mandatory school. And one does get pretty good training when spending a whole year at solving the tasks of a certain armed bransch. Do "professional" US soldiers spend 12 hours a day 5 of 7 days a week for a year, plus 6 weeks 24 hours-around in the forest training for war? I don't understand what is happening here today when people are talking about "conscription" as if it was capturing middle aged guys on the street and putting them through a few weeks of soldier training. What is that? Unheard of throughout all earlier Indo-European history! In 1914 Russia put a couple of millions of well trained soldiers at the front within a couple of weeks. It was a machinery, just push the buttio, and the rails and equipment and officers and everything was where it was supposed to be. What is this stuff hiring some ragtag newbies and rushtraining them? Horrible! Terrible! Awful! (Google translate "Kamala" into the Finish language to see those three words pop up, btw ;-)
@@bjorntorlarsson "I'm Swede and made my mandatory one-year conscript training as 18-19 years old in 1991/92." Yes, i did the "mönstring" the year after, just as the big military drawdown had started and they basically had no clue how many conscripts were supposed to be taken on any more so i ended up dismissed as i was at school, with the end words of "if you want to do conscription later call this number". "When the order came, one went to one's deignated mobilization site, picked up the uniform, rifle and other equipment. Met up with the comrades one had trained together with, and the platoon and company and battalion officers and went to the front. Of course! How else!?? That is the very definition of the concept MOBILIZATION!" Yes. And in the 80s at the very peak of military size, with the extremely wellorganised Swedish system, we could mobilise around 1 million. Just barely and at least theoretically keep everything vital still up and running. But that was full on war mobilisation, which would effectively remove almost all hints of civillian economy. Longterm high readiness but not total mobilisation, IIRC, Sweden could manage about 100-150 thousand while still maintaining relatively normal society. "Do "professional" US soldiers spend 12 hours a day 5 of 7 days a week for a year, plus 6 weeks 24 hours-around in the forest training for war?" *lol* Nope. Which is why back in the day when Swedish conscription still worked properly, it was a mostly unspoken truth that when compared, Swedish conscripts got a more thorough training in less than 1 year, than US army soldiers got in their first 5 years. Sadly, since then, Sweden have adopted a training system closer to the US one... Gods know why... Back in the 90s, training against US troops, unless they were given too much of a handicap, Swedish conscripts trashed them most of the time. Nowadays... Not so much. Especially funny the time US troops bugged out after taking too many losses in a training exercise, under the excuse that Swedish military was acting "unsafe", like terrainfollowing helicopter flights and the like... "I don't understand what is happening here today when people are talking about "conscription" as if it was capturing middle aged guys on the street and putting them through a few weeks of soldier training. What is that? Unheard of throughout all earlier Indo-European history!" Because that is what Ukraine has been doing for over 2 years now. Early on, they also got a fair amount of volunteers, but the majority of their "recruiting" has been done by force, effectively kidnapping. First 15 months the average mobilised per month was around 110-115 thousand, the next 6 or so months, that dropped to around 50-55 thousand and then in May, to 35 thousand. And not just middleaged. The youngest and oldest known so far, because they managed to surrender to Russian troops before getting killed, were 16 and 76 IIRC. Not to mention that "mobilising" the physically infirm has been very popular. One case that got highlighted was the man in his 50s that had an acute heart problem, and got lucky by surrendering, because the Russians managed to get him the medication he needed and at that time had been without for over a week and was getting dangerously worse. And no, that's not conscription, that's pressganging or at best forcibly drafting people. Mobilisation just means readying a nation for war, or putting people in uniform. And according to UA males fleeing to Hungary being interviewed a few months ago, the life expectancy between getting pressganged and killed at the front is around 2-3 weeks. While Russia isn't putting any troops at the frontline without at minimum 6 months of training, and that's just if they come right out of conscription, otherwise it's 8+ months. And outside of the 300 thousand mobilised by Russia late 2022, everyone else fighting is a volunteer...
I’m not saying Belarus is dumb enough to try anything and escalate but i don’t believe for a second that if Belarus launched an attack it wouldn’t put serious strain on Ukraine who is already stretched mighty thin. I usually agree with you but you are downplaying this risk.
@@Phaeton-gu2so THE VoP says UKR has 120K troops on the Belarus border. Belarus= 18K troops. who you got in That fight? UKR has Zero interest in Putin's satellite, puppet regime in Belarus. Why would they? "a WHOLE lot of unknowns." Like in a Fantasy movie? I'm thinkin'.
Still having bad dreams I can hear. Ukraine has enough to do with Russian forces. But they have to report on what can be seen in plain sight. Bielo Russian army are app. 110.000 men all included. So the estimates at the border are within range. Any use of these forces from Bielo Russia are not likely. They have sent most of their equipment as aid to Russia. Another topic are the peoples reaction inside Bielo Russia if Lukachenko would play the card. It could stirr up a revolution. Lukachenko is a very unpopular dictator. He managed to survive the uproar after the last election only by aide from Russia. Another topic... A couple of days ago I received an reply on one of my comments to VoR. There where no adress I could answer on. BUT... I am by no means against the Russian people. I am against Putin and his supporters. The Russian people have been enslaved for hundreds of years. The only change has been in the top management. So people are in no way responsible but naturally very obedient exept for a few.
The ukrainians just attacked trying to get to the Kurk's nuclear Power Plant! If they thought they could take possession of the nuclear weapons that Belarus has. Of course they would make an attack to try and seize those weapons.... and use them
If, Ukraine would attack Belarus, Russia would ALLOW Belarus 2 deploy (they just finished nuclear drills and Russia cant be blamed 4 the use of such weapons) some of its tactical nuclear weapons, against the western side of Ukraine, to defend itself and secondly blocking Nato infiltration from Poland.
10:38 I forgot. Not all farts blow downwind. There's the lingerer. I have farted such a stink it left an impression of my body like a ghost, and when I jumped back into it (the stagnant ghostly fart), it exploded in this beauty of possession. I jumped into myself, like a pro wrestler on a trampoline to dispel the most noxious gas in every direction, stankier than the stankiest the world had ever seen. It was ten times worse than stepping in shit and tracking it through the whole of your wifes freshly cleaned house (with her labor). What impressed me most is how the fart was so well contained, the embodiment of my body, passing through the nethers of my digestion and still holding aerial form. The ghostly gas, from my ass. I splayed into it like Pepe Le Pew.
@@IAMJEFFREY-cw9ns yes, they were Nazis back then, at first they were allies and then they were competitors, the Soviets didn't fight Germany to end Nazism, they fought to come out on top and be in charge of Nazism, you should learn some history so you don't embarrass yourself like this again
Id just like to add that there is a swamp the size of belgium on the border between belarus and ukraine
And mines... Plenty of mines, even if most of them laid by UA.
Swamp mine?
ukraine has released alligators to prevent belarus from invading
Ah yes, belarus my beloved, slavic denmark, best milk products you could get, try glazed cheese from belarus, believe me you wont regret it.
If I were to guess Belarus has probably deployed more than 1/3rd to the border and with another 1/3rd within a 48 hour call up duty if an emergency was declared. I think Belarus is being defensive just to make sure there isn't a incursion. I think 12 to 15 thousand mobile fast acting ready at all times to meet any Ukrainian invading force is enough to slow down an incursion enough for the rest to be called up and for Russia to come in for help. The terrain isn't suitable for moving heavy equipment so this would mostly be done on foot.
Belarus is integrated in the armed forces of the Russian Federation. They are in union. Consider Belarus a republic of the family of nations that is Russia today. The Russian forces act freely there.
FABS would fall on Kiev
That was a good point on the Berlin wall not coming down if the Soviet Union could see the future, but that is true of all our ancestors if they could see what has become of the world. The wrong side won.
Thanks for the update.
“The Ukraine” kills me
because its correct
It shows 52 comments, while actually yt only shows 23.
My comment was deleted even before it was posted, and comments’ counter was nit even updated, like it never happened.
They’re SUCKS! 👎
Thanks Sir, great show .
.... oh and dont forget about the tens of thousands of Chinese and NK troops in Belarus..... hmnnnn....??
And the Nukes on loan from Russia
Wagner forces as well....
tens of thousands? reportedly there are only a couple of 100 unless you are saying every asian soldier counts for 100 regulars
You say the average suburbanite American is making a big deal about the Belarus moving towards the border but you doing the same thing with your delusional fears that Ukraine would launch an assault into Belarus. They don’t have any kind of manpower, resources, no support from their Allie’s to ever pull off such an attack. It would go literally nowhere. At this stage with all their struggles it would be hands down the biggest military blunder in history to introduce a new opponent into the fight. Not even Zelensky is that stupid.
Brilliant report
I completely agree with you
Belarus will get a Kursk style attack
Nowhere else to escalate except perhaps Kaliningrad
Perhaps both at same time
I think Kaliningrad would be a bridge too far for the west. It couldn’t even happen without allowing Ukraine to transit western countries.
KALININGRAD🇷🇺
Im very surprised I thought Belarus had a decent fighting force.
Finland, Japan and the Baltics have "strengthened" their frontiers with Belarus/Russia, with deployment of forces near the borders.
NATO has big sleeves.
The Berlin Wall coming down was strategic for Russia as well. Look at the influence they’ve been able to openly conduct since then. Had those tensions still existed, it would have been nearly impossible to conduct the operations that they have been successful deploying. You can look at our civilization and see a distinct pivot in the years that followed.
They used the weakness of capitalism (greed) to deploy communism, knowing that communism destroys countries.
The hydro dam was a warning shot. If the dam breaks, it floods Kiev.
I think Putin might be slow, mentally, I still like the guy but my goodness. Patient at best. Putin an Urbanite? At this point I'm wondering if Russia even has tactical nuclear weapons 😅. There will never be an end as long as "the Ukraine" continues to have hundreds and thousands of troops
NATO might not win against Russia
Oh well. Better late than sorry, I suppose.
Welcome to reality!
Cant win against so much nuclear weapons....Nato shot everything but not sucess...it is stupid idea from Nato to proxy over Ukraine people
Lmfao, the insanity of that cope 😂
NATO is an international terrorist organization.
What's the use for ua to intervent br?
Ua automatically becomes aggressor. -Eu says we not with ua.
What's the use for nato to intervent br?
Nuke strikes exchange.- gg wp.
GG wp is highly predictable end)
EU doesn't mind taking the side of the aggressor its easy just make up a lying false narrative it works every time why not now?
Ya, belarus has all of four regular army brigades, but as I recall, two of those brigades aren't even fully manned. Basically, belarus hardly has an army.
Where are the Ukrainians getting all these troops to remain active on all of these fronts ? And also, the Chinese army has forces deployed in Belarus, are they going to want to start a war with China ?
43 million people live in Ukraine bro
not anymore
I didn't see any video from your channel since February
Subscribe, normally one a day
All you guys have said for over a year the Ukrainians are running out of soldiers. Then it would make no sense for the Ukrainians to park as you say 100,000 to 120,000 soldiers on that border. That would mean that the Russians could just park and not use three times that amount in that country. The Ukrainians need an additional 300,000 troops on the eastern front. Leaving that many soldiers unengaged would be illogical. Your numbers make no sense. I rarely find disagreement with your statements; but this overview is looking for rationale foundation.
Western press said that Russia was running out of missiles and ammo in 2022.
Western sources claim that many Ukrainian soldiers on the border with Belarus. Ukraine probably uses those positions as a furlough for active troops. They’re not just sitting there camping.
Most people thought Ukraine leaders would have an ounce of sanity but they're willing to throw every single man woman and child into the grinder because they're controlled by NATO
How close is Kiev to the Belarussian border?
Jesus H Crash! What are your sources for the strength of Belarus forces? Their population was one fourth that of Ukraine in 2021 and their GDP/capita 35% higher. That's very substantial considering how Ukraine is now at bay. And now they also have MASSIVE Russian military support aince a year+. They are ready to storm across the Suwalki gap to supply Kaliningrad in a WW3 scenario. "Three brigades" nonsense [UMAss]. According to reputable Wikipedia(!) Belarus could mobilize 400,000 soldiers on their own in 2017 already.
It was through Belarus that the Russian dagger was thrown into the suburbs of Kiev on the very first day of the SMO. How do you imagine that they couldn't do the same on Vilnius and Gdansk tomorrow?
(((Opinion))) detected.
You can't vary troop strength by economic numbers 3 years into a conflict with new alliances Moshe.
"According to reputable Wikipedia(!) Belarus could mobilize 400,000 soldiers on their own in 2017 already."
That would be an extremely theoretical ability. They haven't spent the years since 2014 getting 30 billion$ per year in militarisation aid from EU and Nato like UA.
Instead they've spent that time getting more and more sanctioned for something they had no part of and being attacked by coup attempts and various other covert warfare by the west overall and USA in particular.
They can mobilise 400 thousand if they're directly attacked, yes. But until that happens, no.
@@DIREWOLFx75 I'm Swede and made my mandatory one-year conscript training as 18-19 years old in 1991/92. All able men did it during the cold war, and in the aftermath. It had been like that in all European countries since 100 years. It was taken for granted that all able young men were trained and organized into an Army (and some in the Navy and the Airforce whatnot). When the order came, one went to one's deignated mobilization site, picked up the uniform, rifle and other equipment. Met up with the comrades one had trained together with, and the platoon and company and battalion officers and went to the front. Of course! How else!?? That is the very definition of the concept MOBILIZATION!
That's what conscription means. It is the last year of mandatory school. And one does get pretty good training when spending a whole year at solving the tasks of a certain armed bransch. Do "professional" US soldiers spend 12 hours a day 5 of 7 days a week for a year, plus 6 weeks 24 hours-around in the forest training for war?
I don't understand what is happening here today when people are talking about "conscription" as if it was capturing middle aged guys on the street and putting them through a few weeks of soldier training. What is that? Unheard of throughout all earlier Indo-European history!
In 1914 Russia put a couple of millions of well trained soldiers at the front within a couple of weeks. It was a machinery, just push the buttio, and the rails and equipment and officers and everything was where it was supposed to be. What is this stuff hiring some ragtag newbies and rushtraining them? Horrible! Terrible! Awful! (Google translate "Kamala" into the Finish language to see those three words pop up, btw ;-)
@@bjorntorlarsson "I'm Swede and made my mandatory one-year conscript training as 18-19 years old in 1991/92."
Yes, i did the "mönstring" the year after, just as the big military drawdown had started and they basically had no clue how many conscripts were supposed to be taken on any more so i ended up dismissed as i was at school, with the end words of "if you want to do conscription later call this number".
"When the order came, one went to one's deignated mobilization site, picked up the uniform, rifle and other equipment. Met up with the comrades one had trained together with, and the platoon and company and battalion officers and went to the front. Of course! How else!?? That is the very definition of the concept MOBILIZATION!"
Yes. And in the 80s at the very peak of military size, with the extremely wellorganised Swedish system, we could mobilise around 1 million. Just barely and at least theoretically keep everything vital still up and running.
But that was full on war mobilisation, which would effectively remove almost all hints of civillian economy.
Longterm high readiness but not total mobilisation, IIRC, Sweden could manage about 100-150 thousand while still maintaining relatively normal society.
"Do "professional" US soldiers spend 12 hours a day 5 of 7 days a week for a year, plus 6 weeks 24 hours-around in the forest training for war?"
*lol*
Nope. Which is why back in the day when Swedish conscription still worked properly, it was a mostly unspoken truth that when compared, Swedish conscripts got a more thorough training in less than 1 year, than US army soldiers got in their first 5 years.
Sadly, since then, Sweden have adopted a training system closer to the US one...
Gods know why...
Back in the 90s, training against US troops, unless they were given too much of a handicap, Swedish conscripts trashed them most of the time.
Nowadays... Not so much.
Especially funny the time US troops bugged out after taking too many losses in a training exercise, under the excuse that Swedish military was acting "unsafe", like terrainfollowing helicopter flights and the like...
"I don't understand what is happening here today when people are talking about "conscription" as if it was capturing middle aged guys on the street and putting them through a few weeks of soldier training. What is that? Unheard of throughout all earlier Indo-European history!"
Because that is what Ukraine has been doing for over 2 years now.
Early on, they also got a fair amount of volunteers, but the majority of their "recruiting" has been done by force, effectively kidnapping.
First 15 months the average mobilised per month was around 110-115 thousand, the next 6 or so months, that dropped to around 50-55 thousand and then in May, to 35 thousand.
And not just middleaged. The youngest and oldest known so far, because they managed to surrender to Russian troops before getting killed, were 16 and 76 IIRC. Not to mention that "mobilising" the physically infirm has been very popular. One case that got highlighted was the man in his 50s that had an acute heart problem, and got lucky by surrendering, because the Russians managed to get him the medication he needed and at that time had been without for over a week and was getting dangerously worse.
And no, that's not conscription, that's pressganging or at best forcibly drafting people.
Mobilisation just means readying a nation for war, or putting people in uniform.
And according to UA males fleeing to Hungary being interviewed a few months ago, the life expectancy between getting pressganged and killed at the front is around 2-3 weeks.
While Russia isn't putting any troops at the frontline without at minimum 6 months of training, and that's just if they come right out of conscription, otherwise it's 8+ months.
And outside of the 300 thousand mobilised by Russia late 2022, everyone else fighting is a volunteer...
I find your channel very informing and unbiased I don't see where Ukraine would have the Manpower to mass 100,000 troops at the Belarus border
Scary times. It’s 1939 all over again
I’m not saying Belarus is dumb enough to try anything and escalate but i don’t believe for a second that if Belarus launched an attack it wouldn’t put serious strain on Ukraine who is already stretched mighty thin. I usually agree with you but you are downplaying this risk.
Yeah but, in the end, Belarus would Not have a Military.. huh?
@@louislinsley3128 in the end depends on a WHOLE lot of unknowns.
@@Phaeton-gu2so THE VoP says UKR has 120K troops on the Belarus border. Belarus= 18K troops. who you got in That fight?
UKR has Zero interest in Putin's satellite, puppet regime in Belarus. Why would they?
"a WHOLE lot of unknowns." Like in a Fantasy movie? I'm thinkin'.
Belarus 🦢🦢🦢 ! J
Belarus have nukes now.
Belarus is not a threat to Ukraine ... I think that if Luka moves into Ukraine, West airforce would target, in Ukraine, Belarusian troops
Belarus has close relationships with China.
@@Dmitrij-nl3sc Maybe China will take Lukashenko like Russia took Yanukovich.
Politically invading Belarus would have very negative consequences for Ukraine - it’s politically indefensible (not impossible but unlikely)
baloney. The west can excuse anything Ukraine does that's the power of propaganda and stupid populations
👍💕🇷🇺💪🏻
Still having bad dreams I can hear. Ukraine has enough to do with Russian forces. But they have to report on what can be seen in plain sight. Bielo Russian army are app. 110.000 men all included. So the estimates at the border are within range. Any use of these forces from Bielo Russia are not likely. They have sent most of their equipment as aid to Russia. Another topic are the peoples reaction inside Bielo Russia if Lukachenko would play the card. It could stirr up a revolution. Lukachenko is a very unpopular dictator. He managed to survive the uproar after the last election only by aide from Russia.
Another topic... A couple of days ago I received an reply on one of my comments to VoR. There where no adress I could answer on. BUT... I am by no means against the Russian people. I am against Putin and his supporters. The Russian people have been enslaved for hundreds of years. The only change has been in the top management. So people are in no way responsible but naturally very obedient exept for a few.
Let's go
What do you think will happen if Trump wins vs Kamala?
Then there will come peace around the world.
@@venturehunter3456lol no
@venturehunter3456 are you trolling or really that stupid?
@@alfredpeasant5980 Yes
@@venturehunter3456 🤣🤣🤣🤯🤯
The ukrainians just attacked trying to get to the Kurk's nuclear Power Plant! If they thought they could take possession of the nuclear weapons that Belarus has. Of course they would make an attack to try and seize those weapons.... and use them
😂😂😂
Wow! More russian talking points from ThE VoIcE oF rEaSoN. Who would've thought?
The Voice of sOMeOnE who can't deal with objective truth.
If, Ukraine would attack Belarus, Russia would ALLOW Belarus 2 deploy (they just finished nuclear drills and Russia cant be blamed 4 the use of such weapons) some of its tactical nuclear weapons, against the western side of Ukraine, to defend itself and secondly blocking Nato infiltration from Poland.
10:38 I forgot. Not all farts blow downwind. There's the lingerer. I have farted such a stink it left an impression of my body like a ghost, and when I jumped back into it (the stagnant ghostly fart), it exploded in this beauty of possession. I jumped into myself, like a pro wrestler on a trampoline to dispel the most noxious gas in every direction, stankier than the stankiest the world had ever seen. It was ten times worse than stepping in shit and tracking it through the whole of your wifes freshly cleaned house (with her labor). What impressed me most is how the fart was so well contained, the embodiment of my body, passing through the nethers of my digestion and still holding aerial form. The ghostly gas, from my ass. I splayed into it like Pepe Le Pew.
Wagner are in Belarus over a year for training
Literally Russian Nazis
@@xp8969So the nation that fought Nazis in WW2 to the bitter end now is Nazi? Good joke😒
@@IAMJEFFREY-cw9ns yes, they were Nazis back then, at first they were allies and then they were competitors, the Soviets didn't fight Germany to end Nazism, they fought to come out on top and be in charge of Nazism, you should learn some history so you don't embarrass yourself like this again
@@xp8969 Your comment history says everything about you😂🤣
@@IAMJEFFREY-cw9ns that I hate Nazis? You're right, as a descendent of a woman who barely survived the Holocaust I definitely hate Nazis