IBN ARABI - STATEMENTS OF KUFR?!?!?!?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 26 июл 2021
- Who was Ibn ‘Arabi?
He was a prominent Sufi; in fact he was an extreme Sufi. His name was Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhammad al-Taa’i al-Andalusi.
This video will provide a lengthy academic breakdown providing a breakdown, as to what the Imaams of this religion and the guides of the Muslims say about this Extreme Sufi and his book
#BroHajji
#Sufi
#Islam
Who was Ibn ‘Arabi?
He was a prominent Sufi; in fact he was an extreme Sufi. His name was Muhammad ibn ‘Ali ibn Muhammad al-Taa’i al-Andalusi.
This video will provide a lengthy academic breakdown, as to what the Imaams of this religion and the guides of the Muslims say about this Extreme Sufi and his book.
#BroHajji
#Sufi
#Islam
You've entered لا يعني. What benefit will this bring to the ummah? Are people spreading his beliefs?...it's best to stay away and not be deprived brother. Do a video of following madhabs and scholars or something
@@abdullahibnmiah2986 it's actually very interestingl topic. Some najdis make takfir or call mubtadi of those who make interpretation of wahjatul wujood. Like Dr Israr Ahmed had different interpretation of wahjatul wujood. So this would be an interesting lecture. I am no sufi but Many Sufis say Ibn Taymiyyah misunderstood the statements of ibn Arabi. So would be interested to listen Bro hajji's comment on it
Btw Bro Hajji. I have recently started following your videos. They are very interesting.
One suggestion: change your name from Bro Hajji to Br. Hajji. Or just Hajji. I feel a student of knowledge deserves a better sounding name. I maybe wrong. Thank you
@Labbaik Ya Rasulallah ❤️ MIAW made fatawa that were disgusting but not kufr. Whereas Ibn Arabi made kufr statements. Sheikh al Islam Al Izz (r.a) is blatant on this
@Bro Hajji. Perhaps you should consult with someone like Shaykh Amin Kholwadia on this subject. He is a student of Qari Tayyib saab and a good representation for Deoband in the west.
A great explanation by Dr. Israr Ahmad regarding Shaikh Al Akbar Ibn Arabi(RA) is present on RUclips. It's in urdu. Anyone interested can look up....
What if you don’t understand Urdu?
How would you respond to the classical Scholars, like As Sayuthi and Abdul Ghani, who defended Ibn Arabi? You also quoted Ibn Hajar Al Haythami recently who was not a detractor of Ibn Arabi. Imam Suyuthi also wrote a book "The idiot who call IA a kaafir". Also Shah Wali'ullah was a defender of IA.
A great explanation by Dr. Israr Ahmad regarding Shaikh Al Akbar Ibn Arabi(RA) is present on RUclips. It's in urdu. Anyone interested can look up....
@@syedz9072 wasn’t he a SALAFI too?
People, don't listen to this Bro Hajji boy. All what this anthropomorphic
misguided individual doesn't know anything about Mawlana Shaykh Akbar, The Great Ibn Arabi. Ignore this extremist Najdi kid.
Learn more about Ibn Arabi r.a Here
ruclips.net/video/Kliq0GGysAc/видео.html
Ibn Hajar said:
Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir.Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi said:
Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it.Concerning the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq, they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.
Then he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.
Then he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they were on a straight path.
@@syedz9072 sheikh ul kufr
Surah al-A’raf, verse 156, “Wa rahmati wasi’at kulla shay’in.” Translated: “And My mercy embraces all things.
مَنۡ أَشَآءُۖ وَرَحۡمَتِي وَسِعَتۡ كُلَّ شَيۡءٖۚ فَسَأَكۡتُبُهَا لِلَّذِينَ يَتَّقُونَ وَيُؤۡتُونَ ٱلزَّكَوٰةَ وَٱلَّذِينَ هُم بِـَٔايَٰتِنَا يُؤۡمِنُونَ
“With My punishment I visit whom I will; but My mercy extendeth to all things. That (mercy) I shall ordain for those who do right, and practise regular charity, and those who believe in Our signs;-
this is the full ayah only muslims get his mercy not everyone
Which Subki is it? Taj right?
If i am not get it wrong Ibn Arabi was one of sufist who have big influence on the ottoman empire
Interesting. Alhumdolilah this is an area I don't know much about. I have read some of Ibn Arabi's translated books. I won't lie, there was some benefit in there for me personally as they were more about behaviour rather than Fiqh or Aqidah and I didn't really have any sources to prove or discount what he was saying (this is over ten years ago, not recently). However this is sth new to me so I appreciate this effort and for clarifying. Jzk once again.
The stance that scholars took to Ibn Arabi and Ibn Taymiya when in came to problematic statements was that of silence.
One of the reasons for this was that statements attributed to them could not be verified thus they opted for husnu dhan. This was the safest stance.
True. Because sometimes they weren't there to hear every single statement directly. So it could just be a rumour as well. True.
@@malikialgeriankabyleswag4200 “allah hu alam”
Ibn Hajar said:
Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir.Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi said:
Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it.Concerning the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq, they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.
Then he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.
Then he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they were on a straight path.
What if the book is not from ibn Arabi?
Muhiyyudin Ibn Arabi, What do classical scholars say about him and is it advisable to stay away from his books?
Answer
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful
Assalaamu `alaykum waRahmatullahi Wabarakatuh
Shaykh Muhyiddīn Ibn Arabi was a scholar of the seventh century. He hailed from Spain and was a leading scholar of his era. He excelled in all sciences of Islāmic knowledge. He had authored hundreds books on different topics. He was recognized for his piety and profound knowledge in Tasawwuf. He is counted amongst the great Sufis and was given the title ‘Shaykhul Akbar’ (the great Saint) and ‘Muhyiddīn’ (the reviver of dīn). Allāmah Sha’rāni in his Al-Tabaqāt al-Kubrā, ‘Izzuddīn ibnus Sallām, Safiyyuddīn bin Abil Mansūr, Shaykh Muhammad Al-Yāfi’ī and other Scholars, have praised him.
Ibn Hajar Al-Makki says regarding him:
“There is unanimity that Ibn Arabi was the most knowledgeable Scholar of his era, as he mastered every science of Islāmic knowledge….And there is unanimity that he was the most pious in his era, most staunch on the Sunna and the greatest in self-sacrifice”.
(Al-Fatāwā al-Hadīthiyya, pg 210, Al-Fikr)
Ibn Arabi held a high rank in Ilm (knowledge) and Tasawwuf. However, some Scholars expressed doubts concerning his Aqīda (belief), especially concerning the concept ‘Wahdah Al-Wujūd’. Amongst them were Imām Ibn Taymiyya Al-Harrāni, Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhāb and Imām Dhahabi. Ibn Taymiyya Al-Harrāni was amongst the first that expressed doubt. In fact, some labelled him as Kāfir (wana ‘ūzubillāh).
However, it is important to point out that these doubts concerning Ibn Arabi were due to misunderstanding the writings and terminologies used by Ibn Arabi. The writings of Ibn Arabi are profound, intense and philosophical. Many terminologies used by Ibn Arabi were not understood by all. It was mainly the Sufis and those involved in spiritual exercises that really understood his writings. Therefore, it was the misunderstanding of these scholars that lead them to doubt the legitimacy of Ibn Arabi.
Ibn Arabi stated:
“It is not permissible for those that do not understand our terminologies to study our books” (Al-Fatāwā al-Hadīthiyya, pg 211, Al-Fikr)
The late Grand Mufti of Deoband, Mufti Mahmūd Al-Hasan Ganghohi had stated that there is a lot of misunderstanding regarding Ibn Arabi.
Allāmah Sha’rāni and Mawlāna Ashraf Ali Thānwi had written Al-Yawāqīt wal Jawāhir and Al-Tanbih al-Turba respectively, to clear the doubts and reservations held against Ibn Arabi. Many other books have been authored in support of Ibn Arabi. Therefore, Ibn Arabi was an accepted Scholar.
The books of Ibn Arabi are of two types:
1. Basic books:
These are straight forward and simple books to understand. For example, books that discuss Ahlāq (character), Tarbiya (upbringing) etc. It is advisable to read these books.
2. Complex books:
Those that discuss the concepts of Tasawwuf and other intricate issues. These books should not be studied alone. The tutelage and guidance of a competent Scholar should be sought. Ibn Hajar Makki has warned against studying these books alone.
Refer to:
Al- Fatāwā al-Hadīthiyya, pg 210, 211, Dar Al-Fikr)
Al-Tabaqāt al-Kubrā of Sha’rāni, vol 1, pg 260, Dar Al-Fikr)
Fatāwā Al-Mahmūdiyya, vol 4, pg 469, Fārūqiyya)
And Allah knows best
People, don't listen to this Bro Hajji boy. All what this anthropomorphic
misguided individual doesn't know anything about Mawlana Shaykh Akbar, The Great Ibn Arabi. Ignore this extremist Najdi kid.
Learn more about Ibn Arabi r.a Here
ruclips.net/video/Kliq0GGysAc/видео.html
Ibn Hajar said:
Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir.Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi said:
Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it.Concerning the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq, they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.
Then he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.
Then he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they were on a straight path.
It is mentioned in Radd ul Muhtar v6 p380 that Sultan Al Ulema Izz ud Din Abd us Salaam said reproached Shaykh Al Akbar Muhiyuddin ibn Arabi and said
هو زنديق - he is a heretic
Then one day when one of his companions said to him “I want you to show me the Qutb (one of the highest stations of the Awliyaa)” so he pointed towards ibn Arabi.
So he said to him, you had to reproached him. So he, Sultan Al Ulema Izz ud Din Abd us Salaam, said:
حتى أصون ظاهر الشرع
That was so I could uphold the apparent part of the Shariah (for the common Muslims).
So Ibn Arabi stated:
“It is not permissible for those that do not understand our terminologies to study our books” (Al-Fatāwā al-Hadīthiyya, pg 211, Al-Fikr)
Ibn Hajar said:
Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir.Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi said:
Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it.Concerning the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq, they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.
Then he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.
Then he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they were on a straight path.
It is well known that there are many interpolations in many of the works of ibn arabi that have reached us.
This criticism is entirely based on fusus al hikam. We know ibn arabi wrote a book of this title, however, the version that has reached us cannot authentically be attributed to ibn arabi as there is no authentic sanad connecting the book (in the form that has reached us) back to ibn arabi.
It also contradicts what is in the futuhat al makkiyah, of which we have copies signed by ibn arabi still preserved. There is a critical
edition in print based on this (mahmud ghurab's edition). Ibn Arabi also lays out his aqida in the early chapters of the 1st volume, which is very close to the athari aqida.
The criticism of ibn arabi should be limited
to what has been authentically translated to him (i.e. the futuhat) not the fusus al
hikam.
You should have a talk with someone like sh asrar rashid...would be good
What's he on?
@@TehAbdullah sh asrar rashid is ashari /barelvi . (The one who debated abdru rahman hasan on istagatha) . Bro hajji and asrar rashid are both from bham aswell
@@farzana6676 most likely bro hajji is deobandi if he is attacking thr other 2 groups lol
@@lollol-hm7oz he doesn’t identify as a Barelwi. Although he is on good terms with them
@@lollol-hm7oz he’s not Deobandi. Deobandis are Asharis/ Maturidis. Bro Hajji is Athari
Nooice!
This bro. Hajji believed that he exist, your existence is kufur itself Only Allah Exist.
Doesn't seem to be a strong argument.
These statements don't seem as black and white as they're being made out to be.
Anyone sane knows any Muslim, let alone a Scholar would not agree Pharaoh is the Lord, the most high.
There must be some explanation.
Pharoah manifested the attribute of Allah in his Majesty and splendor. His error was not humbling himself before Allah who gave him these attributes.
@@malikialgeriankabyleswag4200 have you read ibn Arabi? Each of the 99 names of God are expressed at one point or another in believers, whether Majesty or Mercy, but only God has them in their completeness and fullness.
@@malikialgeriankabyleswag4200 that's why getting cozy with ahl ul-bid'ah is such a dangerous endeavour. Hajji and his audience are gradually being pulled toward more and more ghulū.
@@malikialgeriankabyleswag4200 it should be as the way you described, brother. The Sufis are not a sect which reject the other schools like the Salafi Manhaj. They are a Tariqa under a wali, with the silsila passed in a train of transmission, but we keep the aqeedah of the Maliki or Hanafi school we already tread upon. Good question
@@malikialgeriankabyleswag4200 100% correct, these statements cannot be taken out of context
Bro just allow it allah hu alam we don’t know exactly the context of the 7th century literature and the way metaphorically or however he expressed himself allah hu alam
Was he the one in ertugrul lol
Yup
@@ebruvlogs2514 There's no evidence that they came across each other. The drama is not factual except the half of the characters and the main events.
Lol Sultan Ertugrul. My man was NO Sultan
@@smuhammad6763 but he still have big influence on the Ottoman , the other scholar is Ebu Suud Effendi
@@bosbanon3452 his influence was on the latter ottoman earlier ottoman viewed ibn arabi as a heretic
I think my brother if you can call Abdul wahab, rahmallah when he shed so much blood, Is not the blood of a muslim more sacred than the kaba dont know how euthentic that is but you get the jist. Yes i agree some of them statements are strange but to quote scholors just against him is not fair. I think tasawaf is more deeper than just literal understandings ie like mentioned noah (as) people worshipped the idols of their time, these idol worshippers do believe in god but use these animals etc as a reminder of gods power etc.So to go away from that and god is even worser etc. but im not saying scholors cant make mistakes to say that is wrong ie mankind have this weakness. But take the good of each scholor and leave what does not make sense. To call scholars kuffar is wrong.I think theres a balance with being too literal and too spiritual.
This comment not about Ibn 'Arabiy as mu'gtabar scholars are divided about his status, so you will find many lesser Sunnis among ASWJ will remain quiet about him. Neither for him nor against him.
But the Suwfiyya uses a third form of tafsiyr. Ie Tafsiyr bil iyshara. As well as heavily applies flowery ta'gwiyl in their speech and the concept of zdawq.
I used to be rabid against these sort of things as well until i hear the explaination about Tafsiyr Iyshara and how it works. Now i just remain quiet as tafsiyr bil Iyshara is beyond my mind can grasp.
The level of 'Arabic language and Kalaam mastery needed to comment on Tafsiyr bil Ishara is quite high. Beyond the abilities of laymen.
Needless to say, personally i don't agree with this kind of tafsiyr due to itsnature, but again the 'ulamaa are divided on the use of this method of tafsiyr. With some allowing and some against.
Anyways, the Asthaariyya are not suppose to dabble in Kalaam while the Suwfiys are the opposite, heavily into ta'gwiyl and zdaawq; thus judging them using the same intellectual standards is not a cautious act. Rather, the Asthaariyya claimants are weighted against their own professed standards, and the Suwfiyya claimaints likewise are weighted against ttheir own agreed standards.
One thing is for sure though. This hidden/high level meaning stuff Ibn Arabi does is not the way of the Prophet SAW. The Prophet SAW was jawami' al-kalim. His speech was concise but straightforward and contained no hidden meaning/intent. So Ibn Arabi is clearly learning these complicated concepts from something other than Islam.
Personally I do not rate Ibn Arabi at all. Just avoid him. He's not an Imam Abu Hanifa or Imam Maalik or something. His works can be completely disregarded because we dont need to rely on him for anything. It doesn't benefit your Islam to defend someone so controversial.
@@hanzo7616 Read the first paragraph. People are raising a fuss about Ibn 'Arabiy just to create a ruckus. His matter is unclear due to great scholars being so divided about him.
The problem being, there is no studiying of Hadiysth without studyibg Fiq'h and no studying of Fiq'h witbout studying Tasawwuf. Without Tasawwuf, your Islaam will never be complete.
You can only take Tasawwuf by sitting directly with those icenced to teached it. The Suwfiy scholarship. For the members of ASWJ pursing higher knowledge, there is just no way around it.
Imaam Maalik RHM and Imaam Abuw Haniyfa RHM are 'Aimmatul Huda for Fiq'h not Tasawwuf. The main scholars for Tasawwuf agreed by the Sunni scholarship across the board is the chain of Imaam Junayd Al-Bargdaadiy RHM and Imaam Al-Rgazzaliy RHM.
Contrary to what the Salaafiy wants people to believe, Imaam Al-Rgazzaliy RHM is actually a Mujtaahid Mutlaq fiy Al-Mazdhab. A very high level scholar of all the sciences who in theory can start a new mazdhab of his own if it were not for ASWJ agreement to not allowed the formation of any new mazdhab within the fold of ASWJ by 400-500H.
People, don't listen to this Bro Hajji boy. All what this anthropomorphic
misguided individual doesn't know anything about Mawlana Shaykh Akbar, The Great Ibn Arabi. Ignore this extremist Najdi kid.
Learn more about Ibn Arabi r.a Here
ruclips.net/video/Kliq0GGysAc/видео.html
you just wont understand Shaykh Ibn Arabi. just like a high school student might not comprehend or understand an advanced book made for the professors thats the mindset and level of understanding of Shayk Ibn Arabi in relation to the average muslim. believe me Ibn Arabi is for the elites and scholars of spirituality
I clearly understand statements of disbelief - Keep defending kufr 🤦🏽♂️
@@BroHajji but you know that many ulama of the highest rank defended him and said his opponents misunderstood him.
@@BroHajji I guess all the big alims who had a million times more knowledge than you were defending kufr. Allah will take revenge on the Day of Judgement for those harsh words you uttered unless you repent.
@@BroHajji you are thinking like this because your base itself is built by takfiri sect
@@BroHajji cracks me up that legendary scholars who thousands of historic ulemma not only defended but venerated.... will get "refuted" by some dawah boy in birmingham who got C's in high school LOL
08:42 isn't this then subukis takfeer of ottoman empire as they were the followere of these extreme sufis? isnt this chain takfeer like MIAW?
He doesn't make takfir of them. He said خارجون عن طريقة الإسلام
Meaning: they left the "path/way" of Islam.
He's not saying they left Islam. In fact before that he says they are misguided and ignorant. But doesn't make takfir of them.
*and listen, imam Bukhari, rahmatullahi aalayh, refutes your kufr here: Allah has hands, but they are not physical!...*
Only pure hearts that really submitted and surrendered to Allah could understand such great works by Ibn Arabi. Go discover yourself rather than believing what limited minds and tainted hearts say or gossip.
*so no wahhabi who is against imam Bukhari, rahmatullahi aalayh, should live long enough in a state under a Khaliifa, aalayhimur RidwanAllah, saying Allah has a body, and organs, a starting point and an ending point, just not like ours, lol...*
Tread carefully.
What's going on in these comments? Why isn't anyone addressing the clear Kufri statements made by Ibn Arabi? And no, saying that they're too "high level" and that the "context was different" isn't a good argument. Explain what's so high level and out of context and why these statements can't be taken at face value? To call yourself Allah? To claim he is in your pocket? To claim idol worshipping is okay? Are the Muslims who support him really that idiotic?
Many people don’t understand ibn arabi. He was the greatest cheikh of his time.
greatest kafir
Ibn Hajar said:
Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir.Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi said:
Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it.Concerning the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq, they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.
Then he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.
Then he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they were on a straight path.
As an Ashari Sufi-striving person, my jaw dropped at the part about Musa a.s rebuking Harun a.s.
I was going to eventually read Ibn Arabi's books.
Ibn Arabi has nothing to do with asharis.
@Alliance so by this logic you can't say anything is wrong because christians will use same logic to prove themselves even though they themselves know they are wrong
@Alliance if someone say 2+2=5 then he is wrong now you can't say by that he meant something else
People, don't listen to this Bro Hajji boy. All what this anthropomorphic
misguided individual doesn't know anything about Mawlana Shaykh Akbar, The Great Ibn Arabi. Ignore this extremist Najdi kid.
Learn more about Ibn Arabi r.a Here
ruclips.net/video/Kliq0GGysAc/видео.html
Totally disgusting topic, If you have no calibre so why you are discussing about such controversial person? Ulama has difference of opinion and many scholars defended sheikhul Akbar even early ahle hadees scholars of Indian subcontinent despite the fact modern day ahle hadees started taqleed of wahabis... According to mian nazeer hussain dehlvi many wrong things was added into his books by the Jews to defame his image, other says he was in such state of ecstacy where he was unaware and not accountable... Please don't discuss about the thing you have no knowledge about, many big scholars can't understand ibn arabi so who the hell you are?
Bro Hajji, you have achieved the most extraordinary heights of ignorance. Congratulations on your accomplishment!
Don’t take your knowledge from RUclips influencers who perform these lectures (because, sometimes it is just an act) as a part time hobby.
Knowledge should only be taken from those who have studied the traditional Islamic Sciences rigorously under Upright Scholars, with their Sanad tracing back - unbroken - to the Holy Messenger of Allah alayhisalam.
50 years ago, we could never imagine taking our knowledge from a commoner like this. In fact, it never happened over nearly 14 centuries. What a travesty and what a dire state of affairs.
so true!
I don’t think you understand ibn arabi. His whole concept was that Allah swt is “al-Haqq” so nothing truly exists except for Allah swt. Therefore, he meant about the idol worshippers of Nuh that they were worshipping the image of Allah swt that they had for themselves. This is what I understand from ibn arabi. His idea is very deep, that Allah swt is the only reality.
Bro Haji, stick to abc's , don't delve into things you do not have the ability to speak about..
The biggest joke is that ibn jawzi whose example u cite himself did tawba from his previous stance and did baya in hands of Shaykh Syed Abdul Qadir Jeelani, but this fact is conveniently hid under the carpet
How does one claim to be a Hanafi Athari? 🤔
What do you mean?
Anyone who doesn't have collected the proper amount of knowledge and sciences should refrain from reading Ibn 'Arabi's books. Or else they will fall in the same pit as this so called 'Sunni' Bro Hajji
Why you so mad though ..?
Totally disgusting topic out of you, If you have no calibre so why you are discussing about such controversial person? Ulama has difference of opinion and many scholars defended sheikhul Akbar even early ahle hadees scholars of Indian subcontinent despite the fact modern day ahle hadees started taqleed of wahabis... According to mian nazeer hussain dehlvi many wrong things was added into his books by the Jews to defame his image, other says he was in such state of ecstacy where he was unaware and not accountable... Please don't discuss about the thing you have no knowledge about, many big scholars can't understand ibn arabi so who the hell you are?
He wasn't Kufr. He didn't understand you or you don't understand him. Kufr is to do with belief in God, that he clearly is not. A muslim should not doubt another muslif as kufr, doing that is kufr rather. May God guide us.
One thing I can expect some extreme sufis to say is the comment that "Ibn Arabi used sufi specific terminology that if you are unfamiliar with the definitions then on the outward appearance the text does appears to be kufr but the reality is that it is not". Would you be able to address this line of thinking please?
(I believe this idea was sort of mentioned by Imam Suyuti in his work titled 'Tanbih al-Ghabi fi Tanzih Ibn `Arabi' which you might find useful to read over).
Edit: You mentioned in this video Imam Ghazali on witnessing saints and prophets in a state of wakefulness I believe. There's more information on this by again Imam Suyuti in a book called 'Shedding Light on the Possibility of Seeing Prophets and Angels: Tanwīr Al-Ḥalak Fī Imkān Ru'yah Al-Nabī Wa Al-Malak'. Maybe give it a read as well inshaAllah.
People, don't listen to this Bro Hajji boy. All what this anthropomorphic
misguided individual doesn't know anything about Mawlana Shaykh Akbar, The Great Ibn Arabi. Ignore this extremist Najdi kid.
Learn more about Ibn Arabi r.a Here
ruclips.net/video/Kliq0GGysAc/видео.html
@@islamandthesoul mate clearly you haven't watched any of his other videos to be calling him a najdi so ignorantly.
Ibn Hajar said:
Some confusing words of Ibn ‘Arabi were mentioned to our master Shaykh al-Islam Siraaj al-Deen al-Balqeeni, and he was asked about Ibn ‘Arabi. Our Shaykh al-Balqeeni said: he is a kaafir.Abu Zar’ah ibn al-Haafiz al-‘Iraaqi said:
Undoubtedly the famous book Al-Fusoos contains blatant kufr, as does al-Futoohaat al-Makkiyyah. If it is true that he wrote this and continued to believe in it until he died, then he is a kaafir who is doomed to eternity in Hell, no doubt about it.Concerning the people of Nooh he said: if they had turned away from their worship of [their idols] Wudd, Siwaa’, Yaghooth and Ya’ooq, they would have lost more of Al-Haqq.
Then he said: Every object of worship is a manifestation of Al-Haqq. Those who know it, know it, and those who do not know it, do not know it. The one who has knowledge knows what he is worshipping and in what image the object of his worship is manifested. These many and varied manifestations are like the limbs of a physical image.
Then he said concerning the people of Hood: They reached a true state of closeness (to Allaah) and were no longer remote. The heat of Hell no longer affected them and they gained the blessing of closeness to Allaah because they deserved it. They were not given this delicious experience as a favour, but because they deserved it as a result of the essence of their deeds, for they were on a straight path.
Shah Waliullah Dehlvi (ra) himself wrote in his book that he met with the holy soul of the holy Prophet (saws) as for ibn arabi it is better not to talk about him because we are not eligible to talk about him
*Bro hajji needs a braincheck, he does not understand any of the terms, like Rabbaniyya or wahdat al wujood, unity with Allah only means, you have reached the rank of killing your lower self, the nafs...not becoming a creator, lol, ask your miaw, if he is rabbaniya, one with his lord Shaytan, hahaha*
May God forgive you. Little knowledge is dangerous.
People, don't listen to this Bro Hajji boy. All what this anthropomorphic
misguided individual doesn't know anything about Mawlana Shaykh Akbar, The Great Ibn Arabi. Ignore this extremist Najdi kid.
Learn more about Ibn Arabi r.a Here
ruclips.net/video/Kliq0GGysAc/видео.html
To be fair Ibn Arabi was closer to Hinduism than to Islam so he may be an extreme Sufi but a moderate Hindu
Shaykh al-Akbar was from al-Andalus, but sure he’s somehow a Hindu.
This is an ignorant statement. Beware of slandering the friends of Allah, you would do better to just keep your mouth shut.
@@desertezz friend of Iblis, actually even Iblis doesn't believe in Ibn Arabi's paganism.
@@user-kt3uv7nf7i how do you explain that his belief were very similar to that of hindu philosophy called Advaita Vedanta
@@misterx711 how do you explain that Sayyidinan Nabi (ﷺ) held a belief in Jannat that was similar to that of the Christians. Shaykh Ibn al-Arabi had little contact with Hind, and was a Muslim, why do you Indians always make everything about you?
جهل مركب و من لا ادب له
Soooooo according to bro haji. ibn wahab is a Muslim, he is not a khawarij.
Yet he is the forefather of daesh.
One can deduce then that in bro hajis eyes daesh are also Muslim and not khawarij.
Quite contradictory if you ask me
Go watch teletubbies or something this field is not for you or your likes
@@SIGSEGV1337 do educate me. What are the conditions to be classed as a khawarij?
@@osamaal-farra3026 oh nooooo. Someone has resorted to insults. How apt
They are Muslims even if you consider them khawarij. On what basis are you takfeering them?
Ali (r.a) didn't take war booty after fighting the the khawarij. They're Muslim
Dang bro, you sure love pissing off all groups lol. Not that I mind it myself
What kuffr statement did he make ?
did u not watch this whole video ?
People, don't listen to this Bro Hajji boy. All what this anthropomorphic
misguided individual doesn't know anything about Mawlana Shaykh Akbar, The Great Ibn Arabi. Ignore this extremist Najdi kid.
Learn more about Ibn Arabi r.a Here
ruclips.net/video/Kliq0GGysAc/видео.html
As a viewer, I have a request brother hajji, please also do a video on the hardcore kuffriya statements of the founding founders of the deobandi sect THANVi, nanotvi and gangohi who have spread a serious virus for years and every scholar from their sect ducks and dives when questioned.
𝒶𝓂𝑒𝑒𝓃 جزاك الله خيرا
No one ducks and dives them. They are fabricated misprints that don't exist in the real books.
whats wrong with them?
@@hanzo7616 hmmm this is why I am requesting that someone explains this as I haven’t seen any one explain how these books are misprints.
@@ISHsClips read fatawa raheemiyyah vol 1 clearly explained no ducking and diving and its in english!
@@ISHsClips Listen to Maulana Ilyas Ghuman Sahab. He explains them so that even a non Alim or 'student of knowledge' like yourself can understand them. Of course you don't want to see the explanantion since it goes against your narrative.