Benjamin Britten - String Quartet No. 2, Op. 36

Benjamin Britten (1913 - 1976) - String Quartet No. 2 in C major, Op. 36 (1945)
I. Allegro calmo senza rigore [0:00]
II. Vivace [7:52]
III. Chacony. Sostenuto [11:29]
Maggini Quartet (1998)
Britten's second numbered string quartet is in three movements, typically lasting around 28 to 32 minutes.
"Britten’s String Quartet No 2 was written in October 1945, towards the end of a year which had seen the composer catapulted to international stardom with the phenomenal success of his opera Peter Grimes, premiered on 7 June. Grimes marked Britten’s wholehearted return to the English language after the foreign texts which had dominated his vocal works in the preceding years, and this celebration of his vernacular literary heritage continued with the song cycle The Holy Sonnets of John Donne, written just two months after the first production of Peter Grimes. Appropriately, it was at this time that Britten began to devote serious attention to the music of Henry Purcell-undoubtedly the greatest setter of English texts before Britten himself. The Holy Sonnets reveal the influence of Purcell in the use of a ground bass in the final song, and in the carefully controlled declamatory style of the voice throughout the cycle. The Second Quartet, composed immediately after the Donne settings, was specifically written to celebrate the 250th anniversary of Purcell’s death and first performed on the precise date of the anniversary (21 November 1945) at Wigmore Hall by the Zorian Quartet. (Coincidentally, the Donne settings were premiered at the same venue by Britten and Peter Pears on the very next day, which was Britten’s thirty-second birthday.) In homage to Purcell, Britten cast the finale of the Second Quartet in the form of a massive Chacony which lasts considerably longer than the sum of the other two movements.
The first movement of Britten’s Second Quartet is a fine illustration of the close interrelationship of melody and harmony which is such a characteristic feature of his style. The three themes presented consecutively at the outset all commence with the interval of a tenth which is to dominate the movement not only in the melodic dimension but also as a vertical, harmonic element. The movement is original in structure, avoiding a conventional sonata plan in favour of an ongoing process of development. There are occasional glimpses of the influence of Bartók (especially in the use of open-string pedal points and widely spaced harmonics), but the overall effect of the movement is highly unusual. The ensuing scherzo (Vivace) is entirely muted, agitated in mood and built on a stark contrast between shadowy spiccato arpeggios and vigorous unison melody. During the jauntier trio section, the principal theme of the scherzo is presented by the first violin in octaves and rhythmic augmentation. The Chacony finale opens with a unison statement of the ground theme, followed by three sets of six variations each: the first six explore the theme’s harmonic implications, the second are mainly concerned with contrasting rhythmic patterns, and the third with melodic developments. The three groups of variations are punctuated by cadenzas for solo instruments: cello between the first and second groups, viola between the second and third, and first violin after the third. The movement concludes with three further variations which build towards a final climax where the C major tonality of the work is reasserted in a succession of powerful tonic triads. In many ways, this magnificent set of variations forms the culmination of Britten’s early interest in the form as manifested in the youthful sets for piano and oboe, and the Variations on a theme of Frank Bridge for string orchestra."
(sources: Wikipedia, www.hyperion-records.co.uk/dw...)

[@stueystuey1962]

Interesting. I removed my entire watch history (purposely) so that I might be introduced to new works via the autoplay algorithm, which is heavily influenced by ones watch history. So...here is a piece I am not familiar with. At first I assumed it was Schnittke but really not; not macabre or gothic enough. And in some ways better than Schnittke. Also ironically reminiscent of Shostakovich (which it predates!) and a hint of Janacek. I love the lyricism. I love that he anticipates a few of the more modern gestures. Really really good stuff. As a palette cleanser to the ultra modern American serialists I can listen to this once in a while. It may not appear so but I am saying kudos to this English composer who fits really well into the development of the 20th century String Quartet.

[@slateflash]

Their blending in the second movement and their seamless passing-around of that ostinato triplet line is incredible

[@johnpcomposer]

2nd movement is quite a delight.

[@philipthonemann2524]

Thank you very much for posting this! Not a work I know, and very impressive indeed!

[@hemiolaguy]

A masterpiece!

[@timmynaylor4963]

Hugely enjoyable, thankyou

[@binacaman]

Thank you. Marvelous performance of a wonderful work.

[@aramkhachaturian8043]

Interesting

[@robintranter8260]

As well as Purcell, surely Bartok is a powerful influence here.

[@eelswamp]

@@davidschreiter3513 Tonalities, rhythms, structure and an overarching sensing of beauty and profundity.

[@cobblestonegenerator]

@@eelswamp are you saying he got all that from Bartok? Usually most of those things i just attribute to composers doing a good job composing. And while i love Bartok, in my opinion Brittens music is about 10x more "profound" and generally more "beautiful" than Bartoks.

[@eelswamp]

@@cobblestonegenerator "...are you saying he got all that from Bartok?" No. Just an influence.

[@geraldharvey8979]

I love Britten, however, I longed for some passages of full-throated singing.

[@louchesimon]

Schoenberg citation ? At 6min27

[@torterrakart7249]

11:05