This man has not a clue as to what the AV King James Bible is, nor does he know what that Holy book and the Textus Receptus from which it hails has done for the English speaking world and any other language translation that uses the TR, till those supposed "earlier and better" mss. were found (forged) in the mid 19th century. So, i suppose he is saying, God left the world without his Holy word of truth for 19 centuries? In essence, he states that the Textus Receptus which makes up 95% of all extant mss. is corrupt, while the Roman Catholic gnostic, Alexandrian mss. that only comprise 5% between Vaticanus, Sinaiticus and the Alexandrinus texts are much better and not corrupted? What a fool, for such a smart man.
@Calvin Clemons Very well said! I personally totally agree with your comment. He is one of those foolish, subtle liars who one minute says something good about the King James Holy Bible, and then the next minute he attacks it. He is a proponent and supporter of modern bible perversions, and a rank enemy of the King James Holy Bible. He is also just another scholar trying to undermine and destroy someone's faith in the true Holy Bible. 👍
Your argument would be against the so call TR itself. If the kjv or the TR didn’t come into existence until the 16th and 17th centuries, then the world was without a Bible for 14-15 centuries as well. Your own logic self refutes your position. Of course if you think the TR was one monolithic text with thousands of copies and little to no differences between them, as if it is one and the same with the greater collection of the Byzantine family of manuscripts, then this misconception allows for this error. There are multiple TRs, if we should even use that term as it is a bit of a historical misnomer. All of these so called TRs differ from one another, as each Byzantine manuscript also differs from one another. Even if you were going to reject all so called alexandrian manuscripts and only use the Byzantine family of Manuscripts, you would still have to engage in textual criticism (which simply means textual examination) and scholars, pastors, authors, etc. would still argue over which readings are correct.
the king and his translators compare nothing to what Tyndale did by himself... Im yet to finish reading this book but good insight on the king and subjects, from what I understand the king and state surely wanted to control the people, specially by not translating the words priesthood, bishop, deacon, and specially church which are not in the original language Greek...
I absolutely love the king James Bible it is the best translation ever one of the best translations ever because it’s from the original Hebrew and Greek. I even love the audio version on CD read by Alexander Scourby wow when I first heard him read the king James Bible I was immediately blown away I love the king James Bible because it’s the old English which is some tastic.
85% of the KJV contains the words of William Tyndale via the Bishop's Bible. I always kind of hate when people elevate the 1604 translation committee's contribution when it was basically them editing Tyndale. Never forget, people: William Tyndale was a poet who was MURDERED in order to give us the Word. He was clearly on par with the other William: Shakespeare. Check out the Tyndale Bible and you will see for yourself, so much of KJV is thanks to William Tyndale.
The true story of the king James bible and people that died so we could have it see. The story of the king James bible scourby youbible channel. Beautiful!
The fruit of the KJV is undeniable, multiple millions were saved from the preaching of the Gospel out of the KJV, there were even 2-3 great revivals that came during the reign of the KJV. In order to even have it blood was shed by the martyrs, the Lollards, and William Tyndale, about 82 percent of our KJV comes from William Tyndale. Gee, I wonder if any blood was shed to give us the modern perversions that would be a resounding NO!!! But satans cronies won't be silent, they will bash the Word of God and try to give us counterfeits as their master satan would have then to do. He has not changed in 6,000 years Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. His first attack was on the Word of God, as he was the first interpreter of God's word, oh that does not mean what you think it does, here let me explain what it really means, and 6,000 years later he is still doing the same thing attacking the true word of God while trying to impose his counterfeits.
@@Rightlydividing-wx1xb I have been trying to study this issue for some time, when you say textual criticism i cringe, Have you not read anything concerning the counter-reformation of the Jesuits? all of this higher critisism and such can be traced back to them. The council of Trent condemned the writings of protestants, and yet today the Catholic church recomends the niv as an ecumenical translation, but says of the KJV it is woefully out dated. I have the images of sinaiticus, I have a pdf of vaticannus, I cannot read Greek or Hebrew, but I do possess a pair of working eyes, that can see plainly the erased columns in sinaiticus, do I really need to be a Greek or Hebrew scholar to be able to coment on the ghost characters still visible. John Dean Burgon was a Paleographer, an expert in ancient documents, and there have been other scholars, who have weighed in. sinaiticus and vaticanus differ essentially in 3,000 places just in the four Gospels alone. I have all of the most popular bibles, most are in E-sword, some in an android emulator, yet not one of of the 20 plus that I have contains the apocrapha and yet both vaticanus and sinanticus have apocryphal books, if these manuscripts are the oldest and best why are they leaving the Apocrypha out of the protestant editions? I will tell you exactly why, because if they put it in, most of the protestants would not buy them, because the Apocrypha is considered to be a catholic text and unwanted by protestants, thats, why they are not included in the bibles targeted to protestants. They would rather be untrue to their text to sell their bibles than to be true to their text and fail to sell their bibles. I do not need to be an expert myself when so many have already weighed in on this issue, I need but to quote the scholars who have already weighed in. There are just way to many experts in these last days, I have a little something I found, "the tyranny of the expert" Many of the modern day scholars have played right into Rome's hand, oblivious to Rome's desire to get all of her harlot daughters to come back home to roost. The so called critical texts are just one of many means being employed by the Jesuits to bring the protestants back into Rome's clutches. Higher criticism, textual criticism, the tyranny of the scholar!, no longer is Sola Scriptura the basis of truth but truth is disseminated by the scholars if a modern-day scholar says 2 + 2 = 3 then by jingoes 2 + 2 = 3. Everyone and his brother fawns over the scholar, if the scholar says so then it is so.
It is the fruit of the Holy Spirit that you know them. Not the so called fruit of the KJV. The fruit of KJV onlyism is absolutely rotten, full of double standards, hypocrisy and outrageous lies.
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." When a well packaged web of lies has been sold gradually through time to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic. It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled. No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth. This truth will free you to seek for the Living God in the Spirit and to truly KNOW GOD instead of just knowing ABOUT HIM. The GOSPEL is NOT written with ink, nor on tablets of stone, but on our hearts by the Spirit of the Living God. The gentiles who have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, then they are a law unto themselves. Under the New Covenant we are to be led by the Holy Spirit, not the bible. I was searching for truth when Jesus told me, "The bible is an idol" which completely changed my direction. After that I only sought for Him in the Spirit and He has taught me many things on life's journey. The most important of which is that He died so we could be regenerated by the Holy Spirit into sons and daughters of God. The gospel is simple, repent from living after the flesh, ask Jesus to fill you with the Holy Spirit and then be led and controlled by Him through the Spirit. The bible is only history and has absolutely no authority from God to control us, the outward law was under the old covenant. Jesus died to redeem us from the curse of the written law because we were unable to keep it. Have a great journey through life with the Living Christ guiding you. When Jesus words are written down and Satan is using them, then the bible becomes the word of Satan. Constantine (1st) beast compiled 50 bibles, legalized Christianity and set up the false prophet (pope). King James (2nd) beast, born 6/1566, 6th of Scotland, authorized a bible in 1611 that now has 66 books to control people with, an image of God's word they make to speak (the bible says). By having faith in the bible which has been made into an idol, they break the new covenant of having faith in the Living Christ through the Holy Spirit, who is the true word of God. THE BIBLE IS THE MARK OF THE BEAST Ask Jesus -Yeshua for the Holy Spirit. Link To Blog Site Book: Book 1 THE BIBLE IS THE MARK OF THE BEAST bibleismarkofbeast.blogspot.co... BOOK 2 THE BIBLE IS AN IDOL bibleismarkofbeast.blogspot.co... RUclips Channel: ruclips.net/user/BIBLEisMARKofBEASTvideos ••••🕊 💖••••
Removing 7 books from the Old Testament, believed to be the Written Word of God for over 1,100 years (until a Catholic Priest named Luther said otherwise) is nothing to be proud about. Interesting though, the Original King James version of 1611 had all those books in it. Who had the authority to remove them? And how could God lead his Church to error for 1,100 years? Didn't Jesus Christ *promise* to send the paraclete, to lead it to *all truth?* Not just some truth, some of the time?
@Vincent Wood Well _wrong_ Vincent. The Disapora Jews used the septuagint which included all of deuterocanonicals. Jesus and the apostles used the septuagint. And the very same 4th century Catholic Bishops - who decided what books are New Testament scripture - you use the 27 books that they decided upon, out of 300+ early Christian writings, affirmed that the Old Testament consisted of 46 books. Father Luther had no authority whatsoever to say that they error'd 1,100 years earlier on the OT, all the while trusting them on the NT. You do the same.
He'll is the word Gehenna- the always worm infested, burning refuse "garbage dump" of 1st century Jerusalem. The proper understanding is that the jews that rejected the Messiah would end up there- AND THEY DID in the 1st century through the conquering Roman army comprised of many foreign nations. Futurist eschatology does not acknowledge context or Hebrew culture.
Unitarians? Universalists? Why did you not provide a caveat beforehand and not after the presentation? Damn liberal/ latitudinarian jackals. Nevertheless, an informative presentation by My Nicolson
Why does the Geneva Bible reference the word King as King and not Tyrant as you espouse?
Rhetoric and dogma are dangerous, we must seek Truth always even if it goes against what we thought we knew 🙏🏻
All this sounds like today in 2022. Great video thank you Adam for writing the book!
This man has not a clue as to what the AV King James Bible is, nor does he know what that Holy book and the Textus Receptus from which it hails has done for the English speaking world and any other language translation that uses the TR, till those supposed "earlier and better" mss. were found (forged) in the mid 19th century. So, i suppose he is saying, God left the world without his Holy word of truth for 19 centuries?
In essence, he states that the Textus Receptus which makes up 95% of all extant mss. is corrupt, while the Roman Catholic gnostic, Alexandrian mss. that only comprise 5% between Vaticanus, Sinaiticus and the Alexandrinus texts are much better and not corrupted? What a fool, for such a smart man.
Calvin, look in a mirror, then you'll see a fool.
No, he's saying that the King James was a political Bible copied mainly from the Bishops Bible.
@Calvin Clemons
Very well said! I personally totally agree with your comment.
He is one of those foolish, subtle liars who one minute says something good about the King James Holy Bible, and then the next minute he attacks it.
He is a proponent and supporter of modern bible perversions, and a rank enemy of the King James Holy Bible. He is also just another scholar trying to undermine and destroy someone's faith in the true Holy Bible. 👍
If it smells like a Catholic it is.
Your argument would be against the so call TR itself. If the kjv or the TR didn’t come into existence until the 16th and 17th centuries, then the world was without a Bible for 14-15 centuries as well. Your own logic self refutes your position.
Of course if you think the TR was one monolithic text with thousands of copies and little to no differences between them, as if it is one and the same with the greater collection of the Byzantine family of manuscripts, then this misconception allows for this error.
There are multiple TRs, if we should even use that term as it is a bit of a historical misnomer. All of these so called TRs differ from one another, as each Byzantine manuscript also differs from one another.
Even if you were going to reject all so called alexandrian manuscripts and only use the Byzantine family of
Manuscripts, you would still have to engage in textual criticism (which simply means textual examination) and scholars, pastors, authors, etc. would still argue over which readings are correct.
If it turns your crank to have the Apocrypha included by all means have at it. I've seen them and read some and what a bunch of baloney
Interesting
Can anyone tell me what the gentleman says about the book at 3 minutes and 8 seconds
He says "it is an ____ book"
Author-less book😉
@@TheLord_MyShepherd
Thank you!
the king and his translators compare nothing to what Tyndale did by himself... Im yet to finish reading this book but good insight on the king and subjects, from what I understand the king and state surely wanted to control the people, specially by not translating the words priesthood, bishop, deacon, and specially church which are not in the original language Greek...
@Lou Mndzbl Thanks for sharing that viewpoint. These are important issues that can't be overlooked.
I absolutely love the king James Bible it is the best translation ever one of the best translations ever because it’s from the original Hebrew and Greek. I even love the audio version on CD read by Alexander Scourby wow when I first heard him read the king James Bible I was immediately blown away I love the king James Bible because it’s the old English which is some tastic.
1 John 5:7. KJB ☝️
AMEN!
85% of the KJV contains the words of William Tyndale via the Bishop's Bible. I always kind of hate when people elevate the 1604 translation committee's contribution when it was basically them editing Tyndale. Never forget, people: William Tyndale was a poet who was MURDERED in order to give us the Word. He was clearly on par with the other William: Shakespeare. Check out the Tyndale Bible and you will see for yourself, so much of KJV is thanks to William Tyndale.
The true story of the king James bible and people that died so we could have it see. The story of the king James bible scourby youbible channel. Beautiful!
Lol
The fruit of the KJV is undeniable, multiple millions were saved from the preaching of the Gospel out of the KJV, there were even 2-3 great revivals that came during the reign of the KJV.
In order to even have it blood was shed by the martyrs, the Lollards, and William Tyndale, about 82 percent of our KJV comes from William Tyndale.
Gee, I wonder if any blood was shed to give us the modern perversions that would be a resounding NO!!!
But satans cronies won't be silent, they will bash the Word of God and try to give us counterfeits as their master satan would have then to do.
He has not changed in 6,000 years
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
His first attack was on the Word of God, as he was the first interpreter of God's word, oh that does not mean what you think it does, here let me explain what it really means, and 6,000 years later he is still doing the same thing attacking the true word of God while trying to impose his counterfeits.
You are spot on
@@Rightlydividing-wx1xb
I have been trying to study this issue for some time, when you say textual criticism i cringe,
Have you not read anything concerning the counter-reformation of the Jesuits? all of this higher critisism and such can be traced back to them.
The council of Trent condemned the writings of protestants, and yet today the Catholic church recomends the niv as an ecumenical translation, but says of the KJV it is woefully out dated.
I have the images of sinaiticus, I have a pdf of vaticannus, I cannot read Greek or Hebrew, but I do possess a pair of working eyes, that can see plainly the erased columns in sinaiticus, do I really need to be a Greek or Hebrew scholar to be able to coment on the ghost characters still visible.
John Dean Burgon was a Paleographer, an expert in ancient documents, and there have been other scholars, who have weighed in.
sinaiticus and vaticanus differ essentially in 3,000 places just in the four Gospels alone.
I have all of the most popular bibles, most are in E-sword, some in an android emulator, yet not one of of the 20 plus that I have contains the apocrapha and yet both vaticanus and sinanticus have apocryphal books, if these manuscripts are the oldest and best why are they leaving the Apocrypha out of the protestant editions?
I will tell you exactly why, because if they put it in, most of the protestants would not buy them, because the Apocrypha is considered to be a catholic text and unwanted by protestants, thats, why they are not included in the bibles targeted to protestants.
They would rather be untrue to their text to sell their bibles than to be true to their text and fail to sell their bibles.
I do not need to be an expert myself when so many have already weighed in on this issue, I need but to quote the scholars who have already weighed in.
There are just way to many experts in these last days, I have a little something I found, "the tyranny of the expert"
Many of the modern day scholars have played right into Rome's hand, oblivious to Rome's desire to get all of her harlot daughters to come back home to roost.
The so called critical texts are just one of many means being employed by the Jesuits to bring the protestants back into Rome's clutches.
Higher criticism, textual criticism, the tyranny of the scholar!, no longer is Sola Scriptura the basis of truth but truth is disseminated by the scholars if a modern-day scholar says 2 + 2 = 3 then by jingoes 2 + 2 = 3.
Everyone and his brother fawns over the scholar, if the scholar says so then it is so.
@@Rightlydividing-wx1xb
Yes I have an almost 1611 facsimile but with a Roman font and updated spelling
Why it says 1611 on the cover beats me.
It is the fruit of the Holy Spirit that you know them. Not the so called fruit of the KJV. The fruit of KJV onlyism is absolutely rotten, full of double standards, hypocrisy and outrageous lies.
@@samlawrence2695 can you give an example of such?
Ever since Gen 3 , man thinks he has a better idea than the God-breathed Word of Truth.
How does one read a God's breathed word?
@@sansocie
By reading the King James Bible.
I pray that you have been born again.
Nothing like a fool who thinks himself superior to reality. Should've left the subject alone.
Amen!
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."
When a well packaged web of lies has been sold gradually through time to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.
It’s easier to fool people than it is to convince them that they have been fooled.
No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth.
This truth will free you to seek for the Living God in the Spirit and to truly KNOW GOD instead of just knowing ABOUT HIM.
The GOSPEL is NOT written with ink, nor on tablets of stone, but on our hearts by the Spirit of the Living God.
The gentiles who have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, then they are a law unto themselves.
Under the New Covenant we are to be led by the Holy Spirit, not the bible.
I was searching for truth when Jesus told me, "The bible is an idol" which completely changed my direction. After that I only sought for Him in the Spirit and He has taught me many things on life's journey.
The most important of which is that He died so we could be regenerated by the Holy Spirit into sons and daughters of God.
The gospel is simple, repent from living after the flesh, ask Jesus to fill you with the Holy Spirit and then be led and controlled by Him through the Spirit.
The bible is only history and has absolutely no authority from God to control us, the outward law was under the old covenant. Jesus died to redeem us from the curse of the written law because we were unable to keep it.
Have a great journey through life with the Living Christ guiding you.
When Jesus words are written down and Satan is using them, then the bible becomes the word of Satan.
Constantine (1st) beast compiled 50 bibles, legalized Christianity and set up the false prophet (pope).
King James (2nd) beast, born 6/1566, 6th of Scotland, authorized a bible in 1611 that now has 66 books to control people with, an image of God's word they make to speak (the bible says).
By having faith in the bible which has been made into an idol, they break the new covenant of having faith in the Living Christ through the Holy Spirit, who is the true word of God.
THE BIBLE IS THE MARK OF THE BEAST
Ask Jesus -Yeshua for the Holy Spirit.
Link To Blog Site Book:
Book 1 THE BIBLE IS THE MARK OF THE BEAST
bibleismarkofbeast.blogspot.co...
BOOK 2 THE BIBLE IS AN IDOL
bibleismarkofbeast.blogspot.co...
RUclips Channel:
ruclips.net/user/BIBLEisMARKofBEASTvideos
••••🕊 💖••••
?
♥️
Removing 7 books from the Old Testament, believed to be the Written Word of God for over 1,100 years (until a Catholic Priest named Luther said otherwise) is nothing to be proud about.
Interesting though, the Original King James version of 1611 had all those books in it.
Who had the authority to remove them?
And how could God lead his Church to error for 1,100 years?
Didn't Jesus Christ *promise* to send the paraclete, to lead it to *all truth?*
Not just some truth, some of the time?
Have you read those books, wow, what a fairy tail
@Vincent Wood Well _wrong_ Vincent. The Disapora Jews used the septuagint which included all of deuterocanonicals. Jesus and the apostles used the septuagint. And the very same 4th century Catholic Bishops - who decided what books are New Testament scripture - you use the 27 books that they decided upon, out of 300+ early Christian writings, affirmed that the Old Testament consisted of 46 books.
Father Luther had no authority whatsoever to say that they error'd 1,100 years earlier on the OT, all the while trusting them on the NT. You do the same.
Those books were off, except maccabees
Which describes hanukah
I think Adam is wrong about the 'holiness' part. The KJB can not address 'holiness' when its miss translations lie about important things like hell.
He'll is the word Gehenna- the always worm infested, burning refuse "garbage dump" of 1st century Jerusalem. The proper understanding is that the jews that rejected the Messiah would end up there- AND THEY DID in the 1st century through the conquering Roman army comprised of many foreign nations. Futurist eschatology does not acknowledge context or Hebrew culture.
Unitarians? Universalists? Why did you not provide a caveat beforehand and not after the presentation?
Damn liberal/ latitudinarian jackals. Nevertheless, an informative presentation by My Nicolson