Two "jokes" about bad astrologers. 1. A distressed mother consulted a second astrologer because she was told that such an aspect in her son's chart was characteristic of a murderer, to which the astrologer replied: I have this aspect in my chart and for more than 60 years I have never killed anyone. 2. A mature woman who was successful in her business consulted an astrologer who told her that she would never be successful in business.
I admire you so much, Chris. Your contribution to the world hasn’t even been understood yet. Tip of the iceberg. We are so lucky to have you in this community.
One thing I would add to her question around astrologers maybe obfuscating their lack of understanding about WHY astrology works... Chris uses the example of machines, like microwaves or cars, saying that we don't necessarily need to know the mechanics of those machines to know that they work. But one could counter, SOMEONE knows how those things work. The example that I would use, actually, is nature. Because nature works in spite of our baffling lack of understanding of its mechanics. We think we know, but we are unable thus far as a species to understand the specific workings of nature without a profound level of reductionism and leaving things out. Our understanding of science, as Chris says, is subject to change, and that's really in large part because of our inherent ignorance of how the world works. So as with nature, astrology operates in this sort of realm of mystery. When it works, I think it's best for us to be humble toward that and almost recognize that the science we have at present is inadequate to understand it. As of now, it is only able to reduce down elements into their constituent parts, when that's not how nature nor astrology work. Both only operate in relationship to all other parts and facets and must be understood in a transcontextual sense. This is hard for scientifically minded people programmed into the doctrine of reductionism to understand: that reducing something down does not inherently enhance your understanding of something. It may indeed obfuscate and lead to far LESS understanding. There is a level of faith, perhaps, but more than that: there is a humility in approaching astrology and nature that is necessary, in my opinion.
Chris I’ve been drawn to your marvelous combination of intellect and wisdom. I’m a psychologist and analyst and I’m grateful this area knocked on my door in my sixties
I really appreciate your approach to astrology. I was practically born a skeptic and have remained that way, except for a new age phase that culminated in a mental health crisis that taught me I can't just let magical thinking answer everything for me. Even having sworn off of spirituality entirely if there's no empirical evidence, I was never able to let go of astrology because it just works, plain and simple. Especially as I've become more educated on the subject, while looking to be proven wrong, astrology still works despite my skepticism. I'd love to see more skeptics look into astrology below the surface, and really understand it beyond a pop astrology level. It would be fantastic to see more science based research on astrology with an advanced understanding of it
I would prefer it if people who don’t respect or understand astrology stay away from trying to pick it apart with studies. Scientists who are open-minded and team up with professional respected astrologers to work on this are welcome to join the party.
I work at a small town Home Depot. Today I assisted a wonderful customer in need of some basic plumbing bits. After some general small talk, I learned that she was a professional astrologer with 30 years of experience. I said that I would love to schedule a reading with her. She looked sad and said that she would love to do that, she was completely exhausted as she worked with corporations, the human resources for Fortune 500 companies, and she had very little time for personal consultations. I completely believe her because she mentioned multiple things that only an astrologer would even know OR name, or even consider...
@@melissamoore521 oh wow! I hope you were able to at least get an email or some contact info from her. It isn't easy to find people with that many years experience nearby.
Chris I think you’ve played a big part in the expansion of the astrology communities peak over the last few years. I’ve been studying it for the last two years now and I listen to you every week.
Another important note is knowing how valuable the sun & moon’s existence is towards humankind. Without the sun & moon, nothing would grow, no serotonin would be produced, no tides would move, no seasons, no time to rest and regenerate, no concept of cycles and patterns, just nothingness.
1:34:57 Arthur M. Young, engineer, mathematician and the inventor of the Bell helicopter (the first commercialy licensed civilian helicopter) is one example of a highly smart person that wasn't an astrologer but studied it heavily and applied it in his work, which encapsulated other scientific areas. The Geometry of Meaning, one of his books, is one example that beautifully integrated Astrology in a coherent Theory of Everything (TOE).
I don't think it matters if Astrology can be proven or not, as long as it makes you question your existence. As well as questioning what is your true self and what is societal conditioning and/or trauma. it can help you to evolve into a whole person and become to more self aware; which hopefully would lead you to being a more empathetic, compassionate, confident part of the Universe🌌💜 Astrology works for me, but I have seen charts that don't resonate with the person as much as I do with mine. I think this is because I have a natural house chart (Aries rising and so on) and the signs and house expressions are in sync even more than other people's. Thank You Chris 🙏♏✨
Chris, you are such a gift and offer a validity and understanding to astrology. There is so much more to it and with and your depth of knowledge and incredibly capable way of answering these questions have allowed for astrology be given more respect and understanding for more people. So good to have you speak for all of us who practice. Always grateful for all you do, 🙏❤️
Quantum phenomena is actually measurable and you can conduct tests with quantum particles and even replicate results you can’t do that with astrology, in fact if you had 2 people with identical birth charts you would get 2 different outcomes as far as their personalities and what their lives are like , these inconsistencies are what make astrology rather weak and more in the realm of “faith” as opposed to testable/repeatable science
@@SamyyCJRastrology aspects and signs manifest in multiple ways, as people have different lives and have there own choices make. to think if somebody has these same exact aspects and signs it will play out the same is really uninformed view. Not all scorpio sun Aquarius moon and sag rising will act the same, have the same experiences, is just not correct.
Excellent episode! My two cents about the rise of popularity - it's go to do with the Millennials and Pluto in Scorpio. I'm part of that generationally speaking. There's a rise in the need for self-awareness and people my age seek all possible tools to help them understand their complexities and find predictability in a chaotic world. There's a rise in the number of Psychology students as well.
I just want to say that I really truly hope you know how phenomenally well you do what you do, Chris, and how important a role you have played in my life in the last couple of years as a role model in how to be a great astrologer. Keep it up and I wish you even more success!
my skepticism about astrology ends when it is confronted with history, as Chris did in this video. a series of videos from another channel also do this, the 1st video is The Astrology of the 2020s.
The 75% need to listen to this podcast to appreciate the validity, usefulness and complexity of astrology. It may peek the curiosity of many to research it further like your guest. Well done!
7:40! Yes Chris! I really enjoyed this episode (and your magi position!) Abi was a perfect foil for your usually critical perspective. You are the very BEST kind of investigator. You never buy into your own perspective. You always wonder if there is another explanation. Namaste, dear Critic.
You go Chris; breaking down the Scientific Methodology of how Astrology, looks at correlation and methods in the practice as a field of the applied Arts and ai would say science. Very Interesting topic and you are the expert who can speak to its methods and historical evolution and evidence of it as a practice ❤! Thank you for sharing this.
Thanks for the reasoned discussion. My use of astrology has changed over the last twenty years or so, from an initial interest in the psychological aspects to predictive forecasting and now as a personalised mythology for making sense of life. Consequently, I no longer feel the need to find a scientific explanation or even justification for how or why it might work, which is very freeing. Social media's definitely played a role in the current resurgence/popularity, even if mostly superficial or for pure entertainment. It's also interesting to see younger generations talking more openly about Sun-Moon-Rising Signs, retrogrades, etc. I think this coincides with the (inevitable) decline of old-world religions yet those generations still needing an underlying and meaningful connection, such as a shared mythology, which is why many are turning to practices like astrology.
I'm going to say what everyone else is saying - "Excellent job and we'll done Chris Brennan". Blew me away with how you articulated those thoughts and answers so fu*//n well. Thank you for educated me through this discussion and at the same time being such a great spokesman for astrologers everywhere.
Around 29:00 while the discussion is covering confirmation bias: confirmation bias is the name given to a statistical observation by psychologists, itself probability-based. In recent times, scientists have turned their judgment around another concept in psychology, “the placebo effect”, This concept has been used to point to some apparent flaw in the human psyche, but is now being used by drug manufacturers and the medical profession to bring about healing. Psychology as a field of study is not itself immune from all kinds of cultural bias that prevents researchers from studying phenomena they already think they know is worthy of study or not. The scientific method must be used to ask the right questions. We may yet find that there is actually a lot more to “confirmation bias” in understanding the nature of human consciousness than the labeling of a perceived flaw. Thanks to both for keeping a window open on this as a public discussion.
Even as a astrology student I learnt so much off this podcast. I always get scoffed at by skeptical people but this has really put the whole process in an order that can be understood by both astrologers and skepics. Thank you!
Love love love this. Thank you for always keeping things professional, articulate and detailed. She picked a great person to have this conversation with. Thanks again for all you do Chris 👏
Well done Chris! I got into astrology through an earlier fascination (and education) in science and mathematics. When I realised that science didn't have the answers to the big questions, and that academic science was too entrenched to assimilate it's own revolutionary findings, specifically non-linear dynamics, (also misleadingly called chaos theory), I gave up on the academic career I assumed I would follow, took a sabbatical and looked around for ways of running with my interest in these new discoveries. I found astrology, which fit comfortably within a fractal or holographic model of the universe, in keeping with the findings of non-linear dynamics. Within this kind of model, self-similarity - the appearance in the microcosm of patterns manifest in the macrocosm - is the norm, and the idea of wholeness or oneness is fundamental. Although this kind of model doesn't actually explain astrology, it does provide a basis on which astrology 'makes sense', rather than the outdated and now thoroughly disproven 18th century model of causative rationalism which still pervades the majority of society to this day, against which astrology is clearly nonsense.
@@Firqin1986 I just made it up :) It's a short hand for a belief that the world can be understood by breaking it down into parts and understanding those parts and how they interact (rationalism, as in ratio, as in breaking into parts), and that things happen because of physical laws of cause and effect (causative). Having split things into bits, the behaviour of one bit can be explained by other bits acting on it and causing that behaviour. In modern industrial cultures, this is an underlying belief, typically held unconsciously, which makes it hard for people to accept things like astrology, holistic healing modalities and even things like the results of quantum mechanics, and the butterfly effect, despite the fact that these last two things were arrived at using the analytical scientific method (which makes this belief itself, irrational - a paradox which disproves the belief itself).
Perfectly expressed! I too got tired of the entrenched worldviews of academic science that couldn’t grow with new knowledge. Show me a fractal and I can understand what you’re talking about lol
Let me get this straight, so the reason why you believe astrology is right, is due to the concept of self-similarity? I don't understand how these things correlate?
Absolutely brilliant!! You truly are the best spokesperson for the job, Chris! The astrological community wouldn't be the same without you bringing it all together. Scepticism n all 🙌
Dear Chris....I am so grateful for all your knowledge and wisdom that you share. Your Mother must be so proud of you...cause i sure am. I jumped on this art/science/philosophy of the stars during covid days. I am a 65 year old kid who loves to study astrology. Oh and am your Scorpio sun sister from another mother with the moon in Cancer and Libra rising. You have always fascinated me with the amount of information you've got stored and literally pour out during your amazing interviews. Holyeeee! Abi was wonderful and asked great questions which you so carefully and respectfully gave your orations reflecting your passion for this topic. Bravo to you! Much respect🪶
Another great episode on how to deal with sceptics. This has been important as I come from a very science-based family and was totally shamed for loving astrology as I did throughout my life. I liken the inablity to prove astrology to the inability to prove gravity. The only "proof" is in the demonstration/observation that it works!
Great job Chris! You argued your points so eloquently and with such a depth of knowledge it was impossible to walk away not having learned something new. Thank you both!
Thank you for your thoughtful and eloquent responses, Chris. Your book is brilliant. Coming from decades in academia and having been trained in a Research I institution, I was delighted to see this scholarly contribution to the field. Thanks for all you do!
1:35:59 please see a Robotics engineer turned Astrologer named Deepanshu Giri from India who has a channel called LunarAstro and ONLY focuses on predictions as a benchmark for all his trainees and as far as what you said here Chris 1:39:08 The liturgical calendar followed by the Vatican is based on the Nakshatra system.
you provided great critical responses to the complexity of astrology and its study as someone who came into astrology in my mid twenties and attending UAC in 2018 i met many peers who shared a skeptical mind but found astrology hard to deny despite ourselves. we were all of the saturn-uranus-neptune in capricorn cohort trying to find a serious spiritual foundation that wasn’t too woo woo or wild that had us take some time before we could commit to astrology. i feel like astrologers younger than us are more credulous and enthusiastic of astrology as the ease of astro knowledge online has grown. astrologers like you Chris who are grounded and considered were a big part of the shift for me, and finding Tarnas’s academic and philosophical approach. just my take
Great episode explaining astrology to non-experts and skeptics! 👏 Interesting that the popularity of all astrology began in 2018-2019. I became interested in astrology in 2018, but became a student of astrology in 2019.
Just a thought but the uptick in people interested in astrology could be due to the Uranus Sagittarius/9th house ppl like myself...having left or wandered away from traditional religions. I think it was religion that caused astrology to kind of go underground in the first place, but as more truth came out in regard to religion or when people started to question it they opened their mind up to the things that religion rejected. Such as astrology. I actually came into astrology through religion. I would consider myself a scholar honestly because I studied day and night the Bible thoroughly, myself, for understanding (and not just that but i studied diff translations,the hebrew language itself and the torah). Amongst several things I started to see the many references of astrology throughout the Bible, specifically, to the point where I started to view the Bible as a pseudo-astrological-biological book. When the Bible said the word became flesh... are we not all evidence of this? The word being the language of the heavens (the stars/signs) ... we literally emBODY. It's funny because as Chris talked about Astrologers it remind me of Jesus in a way lol. Persecuted, rejected and scoffed at. Loved by some privately and others willing to give their life (symbolically, through avid belief). I think astrology is like the middle man or could be that rainbow bridge that brings together both science and religion...Christ was the middle man between man and "God" ... right? He didn't come to abolish the law but to FULFILL. Astrology doesn't have to come to abolish religion, but maybe through it people may naturally not feel a need for it, almost as if that phase is complete (fulfilled)...
Abi Miller, if you're reading this, I recommend you look at the work of Bernardo Kastrup, particularly his book "More Than Allegory: On religious myth, truth and belief."
I hope astrology is referred to as practical knowledge some time in the future. It is life changing. Idk why it is. But I don't have to have all the answers to have peace. The fact that people try sooo hard to stamp out truly healthy "hippie" ideas and practices is one of many reasons why they should be explored. To get better exploration is necessary.
i just happened to watch the explaining astrology to non astrologers video yesterday and saw that this one came out today. you used the microwave analogy in both and initially when i heard it i really liked it. it made sense that we don't have to understand how something works for it to still work but then I realized that someone out there does understand the mechanics of a microwave (like the manufacturers) or else it wouldn't work. astrology is different, people didn't know why certain celestial movements coincided with earthly events, they just recognized that they did. i personally have reverence for astrology and recognize it's validity but this analogy isn't quite analogous.
What about a doctor who knows anatomy and how the body works but cannot say how the body is given life? I know conception but before that where did we come from and what happens after death.
There are tons of scientifically validated things for which we cannot determine why they work. For numerous medicines we take, we don't know why they work, only that they do work to treat whatever they're indicated to treat. An example would be anti-depressants. One popular hypothesis for why people develop depression was that the brains of depressed people do not produce enough serotonin. This has since been disproved - the brains of depressed and non-depressed people show no significant differences in serotonin levels. And yet, SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, which increase the amount of serotonin in the brain) are still used to treat depression. Why? Because they have still been shown by studies to work to treat depression. We don't know why increasing the levels of serotonin helps depression, even though it does. Here is a quote from an article called 'One Big Myth About Medicine: We Know How Drugs Work: "Knowing why a drug works has historically trailed the treatment, sometimes by decades. Some of the most recognizable drugs -- acetaminophen for pain relief, penicillin for infections, and lithium for bipolar disorder, continue to be scientific mysteries today." The article was published in the Washington Post and shared on the Harvard Medical School website (mentioned so it's clear I'm not citing something on the crackpot side of the internet). Even in the realm of science, both with medicines and various natural processes, we often don't initially understand how or why things work the way they do. When that standard is acceptable for medications many people take everyday that affect their bodies, I think it is fair to extend that standard to astrology. I too dislike the microwave analogy, because microwaves are man-made. I think that a better analogy for astrology is comparing it to how, in the past, we didn't understand how various processes and phenomena in nature work that we know do understand. I think that, given that astrology does work, people will eventually determine the causal mechanism of astrology even though we don't know it today.
I think it’s important to differentiate between modern psychological astrology and traditional astrology for a skeptic. Traditional astrology is predictive and modern astrology “psychological” so I think it depends which kind of astrologer you consult. It’s much easier to confirm the accuracy of predictions than broad strokes of your psychological dispositions… not to say that traditional astrology doesn’t approach your psychological disposition, however they are different approaches generally
New to your channel - it was recommended to me by an astrologer. Very helpful information here for someone who is just starting to learn - thank you 😊 ❤️
Will you be consider inviting astrologer Donny Lim to be on a podcast. I really enjoy him and feel he would fit in great on the astrology podcast. Thanks
Chris, I absolutely loved this interview! Very well done. I’m glad you addressed the topic of a 13th zodiac sign. My hope is that people will broaden their perspective and consider the impact on one’s life using astrology.
You did a very good job here Chris. I would make a suggestion in my observations that science is taking a much more philosophical turn in the last 10 years due to philosophical questions in reference to quantum mechanics etc. as I love much science, read scientific books, watch RUclips channels like Closer To The Truth and yes there is a shift in thinking.
Honestly for me where I'm located everybody that I talk to still has no idea anything about Astrology and it's 2024... Most people that I asked about it only know their sun signs
As to the question of free will and fate. One answer may be: We are destined by the stars, but who is to say our sol did not choose to manifest at the exact moment it did, perhaps with other terms and conditions you would have pre-choosen or agreed to as for the characteristics and vices and virtues to evolve through.
I think one major problem of "science" is when it becomes more of a fixed belief and almost religion when science has no affiliation to any one sort of belief or practice in attempting to observe and understand the world around us. No one can claim there are more scientific than another if someone is in fact using the scientific method which advanced astrologers do in fact use appropriately. In addition, purely using science in a material fashion, I believe, is not in the name of true scientific action which is to observe and use any and all possible tools the world seems to offer or humans have made for ourselves. I believe science is going to make a major evolution in the next 50 years when tools like astrology and other spiritual practices are seen for what they truly offer and have more material observations done about them. Istand by the fact the astrology is not a belief system and it does not require faith. It is a legitimate observation about what is inside which cannot be proven in a typical scientific material fashion, but can be proven nonetheless when one is open-minded and chooses to see the patterns and connections.
Getting into the Jungian book on “dark religion”, eh? Good interview, I could argue that it was too short so many topics fall out of view which isn’t a complaint. If I HAD to do something publicly talking or writing about astrology, it would be the chronological order on why I didn’t care for it and what changed my mind. Also, Dark Religion is a great book, the issue is, it was published not that long ago and the social dynamics have changed so much by the time it was released that it missed many current subjects. I can say, being of the libra Pluto Gen, that being able to calculate a chart yourself is likely a huge reason why it spiked. My Gen liked astrology but it was much more difficult to cast your own chart. I think Chris mentioned “libra’s” as being the most skeptical, one possible reason and/or trick is more “relational” astrology. My Gen cared more about astrology by interpersonal dynamics than “self” dynamics. An issue with that lies in modern sun sign compatibility. Though, that’s fine, especially today; pop astrologers can be gateways into learning more on topics than in the past when info was harder to find. Very rapidly it became too much information where different approaches blend and it ends up a dog chasing their own tails. The DR book focuses on the decline of beliefs, a strong emphasis on Jungian analysis, where the “self” becomes a religion which can be anything from science to superficial beliefs systems which are geared to boost the ego OR practices like yoga that are for exercise (recreation) without the spiritual/religious context on what they mean symbolically. That book was written when the far right started to surface with the dark “self” being worshipped as a “god”, we’ve seen some left escalation also which is completely the point. Psychological astrology is equally dependent on prediction. I don’t remember what made me align the thema Mundi with the Buddhist wheel of life, but it’s the same concept. That wheel, even the 12 links of dependent origins, is like the house/sign system where they’re different experiences that weave together and also rely and are dependable on what’s in aspect an connected; it’s infinite and ever changing. One other example is, I still need to listen to Chris and his appearance on WYS; I like that podcast because I like that people decided to learn about something in the form of a podcast. As the guest stated, part of the problem is there’s this issue where we want to have a solid fact like “how this works” to legitimize something where life is so absurd that we’ll never have that answer. Part of spiritual life is being comfortable with the unknown, we’ve seen the problem with religions where people claim to know a truth they couldn’t possibly know as if they’re the vessel of said truth which is the “dark side of the self”. Scientific mindsets don’t commit to a “fact” until it’s been repeatedly tested as so, and even then it’s still up to be dethroned. An important part of critical thinking is not completely subscribing to anything and collecting more information. One thing that changed my mind on astrology was that this actually happens where astrologers are studying astrology as they go instead of assuming they know the answers, yet, there is an issue with that a little which apparently (when reading some of Valens anthology) was a problem then, also. I like how Valens has brief commentaries getting angrier with each one. I like how he was nice about quadrants, then gets snippier later on. This episode could have been much longer because the topics within astrology are very vast, I prefer the philosophical side more so than most other topics. Medical astrology? 🤢 not into that, but there’s a topic for everyone. I enjoy the free will vs determinism debate, if spear bearers exist as a concept they’d have to function to protect SOME free will. That’s what I found interesting in the house debate, it makes sense to me that they were used as a prediction in length of life. I do view a potential of a changing astrology chart, but I view it as more spacial awareness. The predictive would me like in my own where the sect malefic (bc it’s rising) gains strength but bc it’s in conjunction with a benefic and a superior sect benefic has a superior square, that malefic can’t do that much damage. Saturn in the whole sign 1st, not 12th, should show up as a 1st very very obviously. Psychologically, through the chart experience, different places likely show up. That’s a tough area, any argument for birth chart quadrants are explained by rulership schemes. I could argue planets rising up to angular are that, but if they’re gaining strength through the duration of life they’d show more influence by rulership scheme. I will admit, part of why I’m considering linking the “12 links” is Neptune in pisces may have had an impact on understanding that our individual self identity is completely dependent on another’s self identity. It’s also nice to see Chris channeling his inner Leo 😺. Leader… doing a good job. Paying attention to transits, chiron in the 9th looks very likely to be “astrology” which, if aspects are looked at it’s easy to infer why/what. Astrology caught my attention with a 12th house sun, Valens probably had the most accurate read on moon in 6th. Chiron aspects a lot, but there’s a specific reason why I’m looking at astrology a certain way. Related, one of the few areas I disagree with Chris is astrologers discussing their charts bc I find it fascinating, but I do see (every so often) why Chris doesn’t care for it. Part of why I say chiron is likely astro is the “yod” incident which I think.. if a person has a fragile ego, they may overcompensate using their natal to justify it. Yet, if people openly discussed their charts it can help with modern issues like what makes a person susceptible to conspiracy theories or how to understand how algorithms can manipulate you. Diana Rose often discussed topics like that on episodes. I’d slightly beg to differ a little like.. it’s hard to not watch clips of the WEF and not see extremely weak and pathetic people who need MORE wealth and power bc they are so void of purpose without it. Yet, it’s been culturally propagated to inflate their self worth where, historically, we’ve always hated the wealthy and powerful. (That’s why we used to have high tax rates on the rich) idolizing them is very modern. ^^^ too much. I’ll reuse the song Laibach - Vor Sonnen Auf-gang since it’s about Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra. God is dead. “Oh heaven in the night, you fine, deeper! Higher! I already know it You want to be rid of me; Dawn is already coming You are my freedom Oh heaven above me You, vanishing Here comes the sun, the bright sun. So far, the Hellenistic revival is exciting in terms of that. Hopefully we don’t start sacrificing people during an eclipse, though.
Great episode! She should read _Cosmos and Psyche_ for mundane astrology. Minor point on the 13th sign foolishness: it would not have been NASA that made that declaration, but the IAU. That's enough by itself to recognize clickbait.
Wonderful interview, with interesting discussions!! You really are a gem in the astrology community, Chris. Discovering you and your podcast really deepened my interest in astrology, and has inspired me to pursue it as more than a hobby. Thank you so much! I recently bought your book, and I can't wait to take your course :)
I've been really getting into this podcast since the new year and I'm loving it. I wanted to ask, do you think there is any astrological meaning or impact of the asteroid that came really close to earth last night? I know in this episode you were hesitant to explore the cosmology of why Astrology works but it got me thinking about events like this being more difficult to study because they are so brief, yet the proximity surely has an impact just as powerful if not more so than the asteroids we study like Juno or Chiron. I'd love to hear what thoughts you or others reading this might have on the subject?
Although it's generally viewed that the Heliocentric model replaced the Geocentric one, that doesn't necessarily have to be the case, in that the Heliocentric model is based on a criteria of abstract & mathematically elegent orbits, whilst the Geocentric model is experientially based, both could be correct, just based on different criteria, a type of multicentrism.
1:05:14 Okay! You’re far more patient that I would have been! She needs to listen to one lecture by “Gemini Brett” and understand the simple difference between 360 divided by 12 and the “tropical” tropicos…Earth-based zodiac vs Stellar Sidereal (star based) Constellations of which my people (Vedic astrologers) consider 27/28 that are pertinent to the horizon and ecliptic and not the whole lot of some 88 or so that have very deep predictive capability but is also far more esoteric and only shared word of mouth. 🙏🏼
She picked the right, best, person to talk to. Excellent job, Chris! Thank you.
Agreed!
@@MB.77 Wow yes...Ditto
Two "jokes" about bad astrologers.
1. A distressed mother consulted a second astrologer because she was told that such an aspect in her son's chart was characteristic of a murderer, to which the astrologer replied: I have this aspect in my chart and for more than 60 years I have never killed anyone.
2. A mature woman who was successful in her business consulted an astrologer who told her that she would never be successful in business.
I admire you so much, Chris. Your contribution to the world hasn’t even been understood yet. Tip of the iceberg. We are so lucky to have you in this community.
I second that emotion!
3rd 😁💫💛
Fourth 😊
AMEN ‼️👍🏻👍🏻‼️ & I Fifth that emotion!
Sixth 😊
One thing I would add to her question around astrologers maybe obfuscating their lack of understanding about WHY astrology works... Chris uses the example of machines, like microwaves or cars, saying that we don't necessarily need to know the mechanics of those machines to know that they work. But one could counter, SOMEONE knows how those things work. The example that I would use, actually, is nature. Because nature works in spite of our baffling lack of understanding of its mechanics. We think we know, but we are unable thus far as a species to understand the specific workings of nature without a profound level of reductionism and leaving things out. Our understanding of science, as Chris says, is subject to change, and that's really in large part because of our inherent ignorance of how the world works. So as with nature, astrology operates in this sort of realm of mystery. When it works, I think it's best for us to be humble toward that and almost recognize that the science we have at present is inadequate to understand it. As of now, it is only able to reduce down elements into their constituent parts, when that's not how nature nor astrology work. Both only operate in relationship to all other parts and facets and must be understood in a transcontextual sense. This is hard for scientifically minded people programmed into the doctrine of reductionism to understand: that reducing something down does not inherently enhance your understanding of something. It may indeed obfuscate and lead to far LESS understanding. There is a level of faith, perhaps, but more than that: there is a humility in approaching astrology and nature that is necessary, in my opinion.
Well said!
Beautiful comment
Chris I’ve been drawn to your marvelous combination of intellect and wisdom. I’m a psychologist and analyst and I’m grateful this area knocked on my door in my sixties
I really appreciate your approach to astrology. I was practically born a skeptic and have remained that way, except for a new age phase that culminated in a mental health crisis that taught me I can't just let magical thinking answer everything for me. Even having sworn off of spirituality entirely if there's no empirical evidence, I was never able to let go of astrology because it just works, plain and simple. Especially as I've become more educated on the subject, while looking to be proven wrong, astrology still works despite my skepticism. I'd love to see more skeptics look into astrology below the surface, and really understand it beyond a pop astrology level. It would be fantastic to see more science based research on astrology with an advanced understanding of it
I would prefer it if people who don’t respect or understand astrology stay away from trying to pick it apart with studies. Scientists who are open-minded and team up with professional respected astrologers to work on this are welcome to join the party.
I work at a small town Home Depot. Today I assisted a wonderful customer in need of some basic plumbing bits. After some general small talk, I learned that she was a professional astrologer with 30 years of experience. I said that I would love to schedule a reading with her. She looked sad and said that she would love to do that, she was completely exhausted as she worked with corporations, the human resources for Fortune 500 companies, and she had very little time for personal consultations. I completely believe her because she mentioned multiple things that only an astrologer would even know OR name, or even consider...
@@melissamoore521 oh wow! I hope you were able to at least get an email or some contact info from her. It isn't easy to find people with that many years experience nearby.
Thank you, Chris, for representing astrology with such an erudite & articulate manner - a really excellent conversation ✨🌟👏
Chris I think you’ve played a big part in the expansion of the astrology communities peak over the last few years. I’ve been studying it for the last two years now and I listen to you every week.
Another important note is knowing how valuable the sun & moon’s existence is towards humankind. Without the sun & moon, nothing would grow, no serotonin would be produced, no tides would move, no seasons, no time to rest and regenerate, no concept of cycles and patterns, just nothingness.
1:34:57 Arthur M. Young, engineer, mathematician and the inventor of the Bell helicopter (the first commercialy licensed civilian helicopter) is one example of a highly smart person that wasn't an astrologer but studied it heavily and applied it in his work, which encapsulated other scientific areas. The Geometry of Meaning, one of his books, is one example that beautifully integrated Astrology in a coherent Theory of Everything (TOE).
I don't think it matters if Astrology can be proven or not, as long as it makes you question your existence. As well as questioning what is your true self and what is societal conditioning and/or trauma. it can help you to evolve into a whole person and become to more self aware; which hopefully would lead you to being a more empathetic, compassionate, confident part of the Universe🌌💜 Astrology works for me, but I have seen charts that don't resonate with the person as much as I do with mine. I think this is because I have a natural house chart (Aries rising and so on) and the signs and house expressions are in sync even more than other people's.
Thank You Chris 🙏♏✨
Chris, you are such a gift and offer a validity and understanding to astrology. There is so much more to it and with and your depth of knowledge and incredibly capable way of answering these questions have allowed for astrology be given more respect and understanding for more people. So good to have you speak for all of us who practice. Always grateful for all you do, 🙏❤️
Should I believe in quantum mechanics even though there's no explanation for *why* it should work? (Rhetorical)
Quantum phenomena is actually measurable and you can conduct tests with quantum particles and even replicate results you can’t do that with astrology, in fact if you had 2 people with identical birth charts you would get 2 different outcomes as far as their personalities and what their lives are like , these inconsistencies are what make astrology rather weak and more in the realm of “faith” as opposed to testable/repeatable science
@@SamyyCJRastrology aspects and signs manifest in multiple ways, as people have different lives and have there own choices make. to think if somebody has these same exact aspects and signs it will play out the same is really uninformed view. Not all scorpio sun Aquarius moon and sag rising will act the same, have the same experiences, is just not correct.
Excellent episode! My two cents about the rise of popularity - it's go to do with the Millennials and Pluto in Scorpio. I'm part of that generationally speaking. There's a rise in the need for self-awareness and people my age seek all possible tools to help them understand their complexities and find predictability in a chaotic world. There's a rise in the number of Psychology students as well.
I just want to say that I really truly hope you know how phenomenally well you do what you do, Chris, and how important a role you have played in my life in the last couple of years as a role model in how to be a great astrologer. Keep it up and I wish you even more success!
30 minutes in and absolutely floored at how knowledgeable you are on the subject. even when pressed, you are able to present facts driven responses
my skepticism about astrology ends when it is confronted with history, as Chris did in this video. a series of videos from another channel also do this, the 1st video is The Astrology of the 2020s.
It does become difficult to refute when you see historical events played out and then forward predictions from these come true.
The 75% need to listen to this podcast to appreciate the validity, usefulness and complexity of astrology. It may peek the curiosity of many to research it further like your guest. Well done!
7:40! Yes Chris! I really enjoyed this episode (and your magi position!) Abi was a perfect foil for your usually critical perspective. You are the very BEST kind of investigator. You never buy into your own perspective. You always wonder if there is another explanation. Namaste, dear Critic.
You go Chris; breaking down the Scientific Methodology of how Astrology, looks at correlation and methods in the practice as a field of the applied Arts and ai would say science. Very Interesting topic and you are the expert who can speak to its methods and historical evolution and evidence of it as a practice ❤! Thank you for sharing this.
People in their twenties around 2018: Uranus Neptune conjunction in their birth chart.
Chris is fabulous ...I wish I could have learnt Astrology in school, when i think of all the years wasted on Algebra ...uhh.
Thanks for the reasoned discussion. My use of astrology has changed over the last twenty years or so, from an initial interest in the psychological aspects to predictive forecasting and now as a personalised mythology for making sense of life. Consequently, I no longer feel the need to find a scientific explanation or even justification for how or why it might work, which is very freeing.
Social media's definitely played a role in the current resurgence/popularity, even if mostly superficial or for pure entertainment. It's also interesting to see younger generations talking more openly about Sun-Moon-Rising Signs, retrogrades, etc. I think this coincides with the (inevitable) decline of old-world religions yet those generations still needing an underlying and meaningful connection, such as a shared mythology, which is why many are turning to practices like astrology.
I'm going to say what everyone else is saying - "Excellent job and we'll done Chris Brennan".
Blew me away with how you articulated those thoughts and answers so fu*//n well.
Thank you for educated me through this discussion and at the same time being such a great spokesman for astrologers everywhere.
Around 29:00 while the discussion is covering confirmation bias: confirmation bias is the name given to a statistical observation by psychologists, itself probability-based. In recent times, scientists have turned their judgment around another concept in psychology, “the placebo effect”, This concept has been used to point to some apparent flaw in the human psyche, but is now being used by drug manufacturers and the medical profession to bring about healing. Psychology as a field of study is not itself immune from all kinds of cultural bias that prevents researchers from studying phenomena they already think they know is worthy of study or not. The scientific method must be used to ask the right questions. We may yet find that there is actually a lot more to “confirmation bias” in understanding the nature of human consciousness than the labeling of a perceived flaw. Thanks to both for keeping a window open on this as a public discussion.
Even as a astrology student I learnt so much off this podcast. I always get scoffed at by skeptical people but this has really put the whole process in an order that can be understood by both astrologers and skepics. Thank you!
Love love love this. Thank you for always keeping things professional, articulate and detailed. She picked a great person to have this conversation with. Thanks again for all you do Chris 👏
Well done Chris!
I got into astrology through an earlier fascination (and education) in science and mathematics. When I realised that science didn't have the answers to the big questions, and that academic science was too entrenched to assimilate it's own revolutionary findings, specifically non-linear dynamics, (also misleadingly called chaos theory), I gave up on the academic career I assumed I would follow, took a sabbatical and looked around for ways of running with my interest in these new discoveries. I found astrology, which fit comfortably within a fractal or holographic model of the universe, in keeping with the findings of non-linear dynamics. Within this kind of model, self-similarity - the appearance in the microcosm of patterns manifest in the macrocosm - is the norm, and the idea of wholeness or oneness is fundamental. Although this kind of model doesn't actually explain astrology, it does provide a basis on which astrology 'makes sense', rather than the outdated and now thoroughly disproven 18th century model of causative rationalism which still pervades the majority of society to this day, against which astrology is clearly nonsense.
What is causative rationalism?
@@Firqin1986 I just made it up :) It's a short hand for a belief that the world can be understood by breaking it down into parts and understanding those parts and how they interact (rationalism, as in ratio, as in breaking into parts), and that things happen because of physical laws of cause and effect (causative). Having split things into bits, the behaviour of one bit can be explained by other bits acting on it and causing that behaviour. In modern industrial cultures, this is an underlying belief, typically held unconsciously, which makes it hard for people to accept things like astrology, holistic healing modalities and even things like the results of quantum mechanics, and the butterfly effect, despite the fact that these last two things were arrived at using the analytical scientific method (which makes this belief itself, irrational - a paradox which disproves the belief itself).
Perfectly expressed! I too got tired of the entrenched worldviews of academic science that couldn’t grow with new knowledge. Show me a fractal and I can understand what you’re talking about lol
@@SacredandSalty Thanks! Nice to know I'm not alone ;)
Let me get this straight, so the reason why you believe astrology is right, is due to the concept of self-similarity? I don't understand how these things correlate?
Absolutely brilliant!! You truly are the best spokesperson for the job, Chris! The astrological community wouldn't be the same without you bringing it all together. Scepticism n all 🙌
Dear Chris....I am so grateful for all your knowledge and wisdom that you share. Your Mother must be so proud of you...cause i sure am. I jumped on this art/science/philosophy of the stars during covid days. I am a 65 year old kid who loves to study astrology. Oh and am your Scorpio sun sister from another mother with the moon in Cancer and Libra rising. You have always fascinated me with the amount of information you've got stored and literally pour out during your amazing interviews. Holyeeee! Abi was wonderful and asked great questions which you so carefully and respectfully gave your orations reflecting your passion for this topic. Bravo to you!
Much respect🪶
Another great episode on how to deal with sceptics. This has been important as I come from a very science-based family and was totally shamed for loving astrology as I did throughout my life. I liken the inablity to prove astrology to the inability to prove gravity. The only "proof" is in the demonstration/observation that it works!
Great job Chris! You argued your points so eloquently and with such a depth of knowledge it was impossible to walk away not having learned something new. Thank you both!
Thank you for your thoughtful and eloquent responses, Chris. Your book is brilliant. Coming from decades in academia and having been trained in a Research I institution, I was delighted to see this scholarly contribution to the field. Thanks for all you do!
Chris you are truly the GOAT
This is great!!!
I hope the journalist grasped the general concepts and will use the material on an unbiased angle.
1:35:59 please see a Robotics engineer turned Astrologer named Deepanshu Giri from India who has a channel called LunarAstro and ONLY focuses on predictions as a benchmark for all his trainees and as far as what you said here Chris 1:39:08 The liturgical calendar followed by the Vatican is based on the Nakshatra system.
Perfect timing as we celebrate the New Year and more and more people who never believed are starting to ask questions.
Psychologically speaking, having the sense that astrology works has to do with the ability to differentiate or observe oneself
Brilliant. Sometimes I think without this channel would be a bit lost in astrology. A beautifully clarifying, respectful and informative video.
you provided great critical responses to the complexity of astrology and its study
as someone who came into astrology in my mid twenties and attending UAC in 2018 i met many peers who shared a skeptical mind but found astrology hard to deny despite ourselves. we were all of the saturn-uranus-neptune in capricorn cohort trying to find a serious spiritual foundation that wasn’t too woo woo or wild that had us take some time before we could commit to astrology. i feel like astrologers younger than us are more credulous and enthusiastic of astrology as the ease of astro knowledge online has grown. astrologers like you Chris who are grounded and considered were a big part of the shift for me, and finding Tarnas’s academic and philosophical approach. just my take
Great conversation! Thanks for recording and sharing.
Absolutely *yes.* That is all :D *Aquarius stellium & Taurus rising* ☆
Great episode explaining astrology to non-experts and skeptics! 👏 Interesting that the popularity of all astrology began in 2018-2019. I became interested in astrology in 2018, but became a student of astrology in 2019.
What an amazing discussion! Thank you Chris Brennan, you brilliancy is uncanny!
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Fantastic job Chris, I also really appreciated Abi. This was a nice conversation that I enjoyed listening to 😁
Great talk, Chris and Abi! Chris, you could've also mentioned Jung's study on the probable links between psychoanalysis and astrology.
Wonderful discussion Chris, many thanks ❤️
This was a fantastic episode! Chris, your brain is so complex. I really appreciate the connections you make. Respect.
Just a thought but the uptick in people interested in astrology could be due to the Uranus Sagittarius/9th house ppl like myself...having left or wandered away from traditional religions. I think it was religion that caused astrology to kind of go underground in the first place, but as more truth came out in regard to religion or when people started to question it they opened their mind up to the things that religion rejected. Such as astrology.
I actually came into astrology through religion. I would consider myself a scholar honestly because I studied day and night the Bible thoroughly, myself, for understanding (and not just that but i studied diff translations,the hebrew language itself and the torah). Amongst several things I started to see the many references of astrology throughout the Bible, specifically, to the point where I started to view the Bible as a pseudo-astrological-biological book.
When the Bible said the word became flesh... are we not all evidence of this? The word being the language of the heavens (the stars/signs) ... we literally emBODY.
It's funny because as Chris talked about Astrologers it remind me of Jesus in a way lol. Persecuted, rejected and scoffed at. Loved by some privately and others willing to give their life (symbolically, through avid belief). I think astrology is like the middle man or could be that rainbow bridge that brings together both science and religion...Christ was the middle man between man and "God" ... right? He didn't come to abolish the law but to FULFILL. Astrology doesn't have to come to abolish religion, but maybe through it people may naturally not feel a need for it, almost as if that phase is complete (fulfilled)...
Really love this coming out on the hours of Aquarian new moon, with Venus joined Saturn.
Idealistic. 💜
Abi Miller, if you're reading this, I recommend you look at the work of Bernardo Kastrup, particularly his book "More Than Allegory: On religious myth, truth and belief."
Its like being a mathematician and trying to explain the value of numbers to someone that knows only how to add.
I hope astrology is referred to as practical knowledge some time in the future. It is life changing. Idk why it is. But I don't have to have all the answers to have peace. The fact that people try sooo hard to stamp out truly healthy "hippie" ideas and practices is one of many reasons why they should be explored. To get better exploration is necessary.
Nailed it!
Thank you for your wise words, Chris. ❤️
Now I have the perfect video to offer someone who is giving me shit about listening to astrology. Nice one Chris!
i just happened to watch the explaining astrology to non astrologers video yesterday and saw that this one came out today. you used the microwave analogy in both and initially when i heard it i really liked it. it made sense that we don't have to understand how something works for it to still work but then I realized that someone out there does understand the mechanics of a microwave (like the manufacturers) or else it wouldn't work. astrology is different, people didn't know why certain celestial movements coincided with earthly events, they just recognized that they did. i personally have reverence for astrology and recognize it's validity but this analogy isn't quite analogous.
What about a doctor who knows anatomy and how the body works but cannot say how the body is given life? I know conception but before that where did we come from and what happens after death.
There are tons of scientifically validated things for which we cannot determine why they work.
For numerous medicines we take, we don't know why they work, only that they do work to treat whatever they're indicated to treat.
An example would be anti-depressants. One popular hypothesis for why people develop depression was that the brains of depressed people do not produce enough serotonin. This has since been disproved - the brains of depressed and non-depressed people show no significant differences in serotonin levels. And yet, SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, which increase the amount of serotonin in the brain) are still used to treat depression. Why? Because they have still been shown by studies to work to treat depression. We don't know why increasing the levels of serotonin helps depression, even though it does.
Here is a quote from an article called 'One Big Myth About Medicine: We Know How Drugs Work: "Knowing why a drug works has historically trailed the treatment, sometimes by decades. Some of the most recognizable drugs -- acetaminophen for pain relief, penicillin for infections, and lithium for bipolar disorder, continue to be scientific mysteries today." The article was published in the Washington Post and shared on the Harvard Medical School website (mentioned so it's clear I'm not citing something on the crackpot side of the internet).
Even in the realm of science, both with medicines and various natural processes, we often don't initially understand how or why things work the way they do. When that standard is acceptable for medications many people take everyday that affect their bodies, I think it is fair to extend that standard to astrology.
I too dislike the microwave analogy, because microwaves are man-made. I think that a better analogy for astrology is comparing it to how, in the past, we didn't understand how various processes and phenomena in nature work that we know do understand. I think that, given that astrology does work, people will eventually determine the causal mechanism of astrology even though we don't know it today.
Brilliant. Enlightening. Thanks so much for posting this.
Chris, this is you best episode so far (and I have seen many good ones)
Thank you for this! I am grateful for this conversation!
This is such an important and therefore valuable discussion!
Thank you!
I think it’s important to differentiate between modern psychological astrology and traditional astrology for a skeptic. Traditional astrology is predictive and modern astrology “psychological” so I think it depends which kind of astrologer you consult. It’s much easier to confirm the accuracy of predictions than broad strokes of your psychological dispositions… not to say that traditional astrology doesn’t approach your psychological disposition, however they are different approaches generally
Brilliant Chris! Thank you so much!!
New to your channel - it was recommended to me by an astrologer. Very helpful information here for someone who is just starting to learn - thank you 😊 ❤️
Will you be consider inviting astrologer Donny Lim to be on a podcast. I really enjoy him and feel he would fit in great on the astrology podcast. Thanks
this was an amazing episode! I loved Abi and all her questions and it was really cool to see you guys chat
So enjoy this podcast.
Great conversation, raises more questions than answers, but that unto itself is useful. The dialogue is excellent.
This is a fantastic episode, thank you! Your wisdom and analysis are inspiring
Chris, I absolutely loved this interview! Very well done. I’m glad you addressed the topic of a 13th zodiac sign. My hope is that people will broaden their perspective and consider the impact on one’s life using astrology.
You did a very good job here Chris. I would make a suggestion in my observations that science is taking a much more philosophical turn in the last 10 years due to philosophical questions in reference to quantum mechanics etc. as I love much science, read scientific books, watch RUclips channels like Closer To The Truth and yes there is a shift in thinking.
Any recommended reading related to this trend/phenomenon?
"Loved"..
Thank you Chris 40's
Most excellent!
I'm glad to have you. 1:42:12
Would consider doing an episode/a deep dive conversation on astrocartography?
Wonderful discussion! Thank you 💞
Honestly for me where I'm located everybody that I talk to still has no idea anything about Astrology and it's 2024... Most people that I asked about it only know their sun signs
Go Chris!!! 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Thank you for doing this
As to the question of free will and fate. One answer may be: We are destined by the stars, but who is to say our sol did not choose to manifest at the exact moment it did, perhaps with other terms and conditions you would have pre-choosen or agreed to as for the characteristics and vices and virtues to evolve through.
I think one major problem of "science" is when it becomes more of a fixed belief and almost religion when science has no affiliation to any one sort of belief or practice in attempting to observe and understand the world around us. No one can claim there are more scientific than another if someone is in fact using the scientific method which advanced astrologers do in fact use appropriately. In addition, purely using science in a material fashion, I believe, is not in the name of true scientific action which is to observe and use any and all possible tools the world seems to offer or humans have made for ourselves. I believe science is going to make a major evolution in the next 50 years when tools like astrology and other spiritual practices are seen for what they truly offer and have more material observations done about them.
Istand by the fact the astrology is not a belief system and it does not require faith. It is a legitimate observation about what is inside which cannot be proven in a typical scientific material fashion, but can be proven nonetheless when one is open-minded and chooses to see the patterns and connections.
Getting into the Jungian book on “dark religion”, eh? Good interview, I could argue that it was too short so many topics fall out of view which isn’t a complaint. If I HAD to do something publicly talking or writing about astrology, it would be the chronological order on why I didn’t care for it and what changed my mind. Also, Dark Religion is a great book, the issue is, it was published not that long ago and the social dynamics have changed so much by the time it was released that it missed many current subjects.
I can say, being of the libra Pluto Gen, that being able to calculate a chart yourself is likely a huge reason why it spiked. My Gen liked astrology but it was much more difficult to cast your own chart. I think Chris mentioned “libra’s” as being the most skeptical, one possible reason and/or trick is more “relational” astrology. My Gen cared more about astrology by interpersonal dynamics than “self” dynamics. An issue with that lies in modern sun sign compatibility. Though, that’s fine, especially today; pop astrologers can be gateways into learning more on topics than in the past when info was harder to find. Very rapidly it became too much information where different approaches blend and it ends up a dog chasing their own tails.
The DR book focuses on the decline of beliefs, a strong emphasis on Jungian analysis, where the “self” becomes a religion which can be anything from science to superficial beliefs systems which are geared to boost the ego OR practices like yoga that are for exercise (recreation) without the spiritual/religious context on what they mean symbolically. That book was written when the far right started to surface with the dark “self” being worshipped as a “god”, we’ve seen some left escalation also which is completely the point.
Psychological astrology is equally dependent on prediction. I don’t remember what made me align the thema Mundi with the Buddhist wheel of life, but it’s the same concept. That wheel, even the 12 links of dependent origins, is like the house/sign system where they’re different experiences that weave together and also rely and are dependable on what’s in aspect an connected; it’s infinite and ever changing.
One other example is, I still need to listen to Chris and his appearance on WYS; I like that podcast because I like that people decided to learn about something in the form of a podcast.
As the guest stated, part of the problem is there’s this issue where we want to have a solid fact like “how this works” to legitimize something where life is so absurd that we’ll never have that answer. Part of spiritual life is being comfortable with the unknown, we’ve seen the problem with religions where people claim to know a truth they couldn’t possibly know as if they’re the vessel of said truth which is the “dark side of the self”. Scientific mindsets don’t commit to a “fact” until it’s been repeatedly tested as so, and even then it’s still up to be dethroned. An important part of critical thinking is not completely subscribing to anything and collecting more information. One thing that changed my mind on astrology was that this actually happens where astrologers are studying astrology as they go instead of assuming they know the answers, yet, there is an issue with that a little which apparently (when reading some of Valens anthology) was a problem then, also. I like how Valens has brief commentaries getting angrier with each one. I like how he was nice about quadrants, then gets snippier later on. This episode could have been much longer because the topics within astrology are very vast, I prefer the philosophical side more so than most other topics. Medical astrology? 🤢 not into that, but there’s a topic for everyone.
I enjoy the free will vs determinism debate, if spear bearers exist as a concept they’d have to function to protect SOME free will. That’s what I found interesting in the house debate, it makes sense to me that they were used as a prediction in length of life. I do view a potential of a changing astrology chart, but I view it as more spacial awareness. The predictive would me like in my own where the sect malefic (bc it’s rising) gains strength but bc it’s in conjunction with a benefic and a superior sect benefic has a superior square, that malefic can’t do that much damage. Saturn in the whole sign 1st, not 12th, should show up as a 1st very very obviously. Psychologically, through the chart experience, different places likely show up. That’s a tough area, any argument for birth chart quadrants are explained by rulership schemes. I could argue planets rising up to angular are that, but if they’re gaining strength through the duration of life they’d show more influence by rulership scheme. I will admit, part of why I’m considering linking the “12 links” is Neptune in pisces may have had an impact on understanding that our individual self identity is completely dependent on another’s self identity.
It’s also nice to see Chris channeling his inner Leo 😺. Leader… doing a good job. Paying attention to transits, chiron in the 9th looks very likely to be “astrology” which, if aspects are looked at it’s easy to infer why/what. Astrology caught my attention with a 12th house sun, Valens probably had the most accurate read on moon in 6th. Chiron aspects a lot, but there’s a specific reason why I’m looking at astrology a certain way. Related, one of the few areas I disagree with Chris is astrologers discussing their charts bc I find it fascinating, but I do see (every so often) why Chris doesn’t care for it. Part of why I say chiron is likely astro is the “yod” incident which I think.. if a person has a fragile ego, they may overcompensate using their natal to justify it. Yet, if people openly discussed their charts it can help with modern issues like what makes a person susceptible to conspiracy theories or how to understand how algorithms can manipulate you. Diana Rose often discussed topics like that on episodes. I’d slightly beg to differ a little like.. it’s hard to not watch clips of the WEF and not see extremely weak and pathetic people who need MORE wealth and power bc they are so void of purpose without it. Yet, it’s been culturally propagated to inflate their self worth where, historically, we’ve always hated the wealthy and powerful. (That’s why we used to have high tax rates on the rich) idolizing them is very modern.
^^^ too much. I’ll reuse the song Laibach - Vor Sonnen Auf-gang since it’s about Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra. God is dead. “Oh heaven in the night, you fine, deeper! Higher!
I already know it
You want to be rid of me;
Dawn is already coming
You are my freedom
Oh heaven above me
You, vanishing
Here comes the sun, the bright sun.
So far, the Hellenistic revival is exciting in terms of that. Hopefully we don’t start sacrificing people during an eclipse, though.
Great episode! She should read _Cosmos and Psyche_ for mundane astrology. Minor point on the 13th sign foolishness: it would not have been NASA that made that declaration, but the IAU. That's enough by itself to recognize clickbait.
Excellent! Well done. 👍👍
Just absolutely brilliant!
Wonderful interview, with interesting discussions!! You really are a gem in the astrology community, Chris. Discovering you and your podcast really deepened my interest in astrology, and has inspired me to pursue it as more than a hobby. Thank you so much! I recently bought your book, and I can't wait to take your course :)
Very well spoken. Much respect!
Great job 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Thank you
I've been really getting into this podcast since the new year and I'm loving it. I wanted to ask, do you think there is any astrological meaning or impact of the asteroid that came really close to earth last night? I know in this episode you were hesitant to explore the cosmology of why Astrology works but it got me thinking about events like this being more difficult to study because they are so brief, yet the proximity surely has an impact just as powerful if not more so than the asteroids we study like Juno or Chiron. I'd love to hear what thoughts you or others reading this might have on the subject?
Although it's generally viewed that the Heliocentric model replaced the Geocentric one, that doesn't necessarily have to be the case, in that the Heliocentric model is based on a criteria of abstract & mathematically elegent orbits, whilst the Geocentric model is experientially based, both could be correct, just based on different criteria, a type of multicentrism.
Would love to hear a Neptune in Aries talk joining with Saturn in 2026 forming a conjunction.
Great job Chris!
Good on you Chris. She could speak with Adam Elenbaas regarding astrology being a spiritual practice ☯️🪶
Liked & shared.
Another great talk Chris!
Chris, I'm waiting and waiting for your next book... 🤓 I really hope that something is being created behind the scenes 😛
Epic topic!
this was wonderful! thank you so much ♥️
1:05:14 Okay! You’re far more patient that I would have been! She needs to listen to one lecture by “Gemini Brett” and understand the simple difference between 360 divided by 12 and the “tropical” tropicos…Earth-based zodiac vs Stellar Sidereal (star based) Constellations of which my people (Vedic astrologers) consider 27/28 that are pertinent to the horizon and ecliptic and not the whole lot of some 88 or so that have very deep predictive capability but is also far more esoteric and only shared word of mouth. 🙏🏼
Your videos are very educational. If you have knowledge of "Directional Astrology" by Sepharial, could you make a video discussing this method?
I think the cosmology of astrology is related with platonic forms theory and also the medieval cosmological view held by people like Agrippa