Good to see yet another manufacturer offering disc and dac stages as an option and also reasonably priced . As for your question I have gone down the route of a separate preamplifier and two bridges mono power amplifiers believing that it will achieve the best sound quality,including a preamplifier which has an internally balanced architecture. The arrangement gives detail and space with a balanced sound quality overall. I have not looked at an integrated for a long time but you never know I might be surprised.
Funny how just a single purchase can change our purchase criteria completely! I only ever looked at integrated amps up to 12 months ago but now I have a pre-amp I love I'm only really looking at power amps!! The IN400 would have definitely been on my radar after this review even if at the very top of my budget!! Great review Tarun thank you.
Recently got my hands on an entry levels accuphase preamp and am totally blown away! Outstanding performance, the tone controls also give you so much more flexibility which makes the hobby imo more interesting and satisfying.
I am an Atoll fan so I'm especially happy to see the in400 get top marks! I have an Atoll cd transport and the in80 (thanks in part to this very channel) and I just love them to bits. If and when I break out of the tiny studio apartment I live in now, I would not hesitate for one moment to trial their higher end models first and foremost. As you say, they offer exceptional quality at very reasonable prices - nevermind the extra edge that they are still made in France. And to your question of the day, in fact I ended up with the IN80 after a frustrating search for a "good" preamp to match with a hypex power amp. For the love of pete, the available preamps were more expensive than the amp itself and of course there was the added rabbit hole of evaling "synergy" etc - I got so disgusted I decided to simplify things so I trialed an open box IN50. It was a little bit too thick and forward in the midrange for my taste (I also suspected that unit may have been...ridden hard, shall we say?) I exchanged that for a spanking new IN80 and found a *very* happy place. If and when I am in the market again I think I will keep things simple and go for an integrated. Not only is it easier (for me) to eval the sound qualities with just one unit, it also takes up less space, and I prefer that.
Because of your excellent reviews Atoll remains on my radar as a worthwhile purchase. Thank you for your time, efforts, and sharing this manufacturer with us all. Stay well, Sir.
Great review, Tarun. It’s a fascinating amplifier. I have been curious about Atoll ever since you reviewed the IN300. I have always liked the idea of separate pre and power amplifiers. It is just that they don’t get reviewed very often and retailers here generally don’t have more than a few separates to audition.
I often enjoy your Atoll Reviews....If I were to buy an integrated amp this would be at top of my list...OOH La La! I'll have mine in silver, please. Being a crass American I LOVE the "tacky" knob backlights and and the elegant design, but prefer the the shape and styling of the chassis on The Evo's predecessor! Love the beauty of the innards too, Tarun! I am an American-separates kind of guy: Turbocharged Schiit Freya + pre-amp (I replaced the cheap capacitors & resistors with $800 worth of audiophile replacements in the tube circuit), driving my McIntosh MC152 Power Amp. Full-bodied, powerful and tight...just like this Atoll!!!
Thanks Tarun. My experience with Atoll was very positive. I like things voiced this way. Keep up the good work. I am a tinkerer so I love having separates, I can tube roll my preamp and juggle interconnects between pre and amps. Just fine tune to my hearts discontent.
Thanks for the review. Again an integrated amp that’s new to me. To answer your question, I prefer separate amps and preamps after many years with many different integrated components. I find that the focus on just inputs and control and just clean clear power gives the edge to separates. Plus I love the looks of separate matching pieces. I loved it when I was a kid and couldn’t afford it so I’m living the dream now. Have a great weekend!
1. For desktop applications I am more inclined towards simplicity. So two possible solutions come to mind: Active speakers with everything built in (KEF LS50 wirelss) or passive speakers with "super" integrated amplifier (streamer, DAC and integrated amp in one): e.g. lidenmann Move Mini speakers with Musicbook Combo integrated amp). For both of these solutions you need ethernet cable (if WIFI is not included) and power cable. That is it. No clutter. 2. For standard listening application I see two possible solution to my taste. Quite opposite to each other. Both solutions include a power amplifier (mono or not; does not matter if quality is there). First solution needs a streamer, DAC as it is an analog valve/tube preamplifier for its otherwise unreproducible tube sound (e.g. PS Audio BHK preamplifier). The second is a "digital" preamplifier with streamer, DAC, HDMI Arc input, DIRAC, independent sub outs etc... (e.g. NAD M66). That is my take on integrated vs. separates. ;-)
Much impressed by the layout, looks to be an awesome amplifier. Regarding pre+power vs. integrated, I’ve always preferred separates, but I have to admit that the built-in synergy of an integrated finds me questioning my preference. Then there is the issue of interconnecting cables, and the sheer bulk of a two-box solution, which can easily morph into a three-box solution if your preamp puts its power supply in a separate enclosure. I really like the fact that the IN400 doesn’t force you accept a DAC or phono stage, I also like the fact that a 1/4” Jack is provided for a headphone is provided: every integrated should have one. Another issue is a balance control, power amps generally do not have them, and not all preamps have them (Schiit Freya+), most all integrated amplifiers offer this feature. When you need it, you really need it.
I recently purchased a Schiit Ragnarok 2. Yeah, it sounds much to my liking but I'd like to improve my system with a bit more power. Enter the new Schiit Wotan class A/B power amp that reportedly runs Class A up to 30W. Evidently the Forkbeard app indicates Class A usage. Fortunately the Ragnarok has pre-out via XLR which would make for a perfect link to the Wotan's XLR. Further: There's a chap here in Canada that designs tube buffers. (Space-Tech Labs) Fortunately he lives close by and I have visited him a few times. It would be fun to place one of his buffers between the Rag and the Wotan and see if the sound opens up to the degree to make an investment worthwhile. There ya have it Tarun... you asked where some of us are at integrated amp-wise. I love this hobby!!! One of my audio buddies once called me a bliss-pig. I Am.
another great review as always. i like to think of myself as someone who looks to the future. i am not stuck in my ways and welcome all the advancements in 2 channel technology. i was speaking to an electrical engineer the other day, who was fixing a part for me and it became obvious that he was not interested in new technology, (he was pretty old) as i tried to convince him that class d and switch mode power supplies had come along way. class a and a/b are not the obvious choice these days and one doesn't need a huge toroidal transformer to get great sound anymore. just ask the scandinavians. so i would imagine that the same applies to mono blocks v integrated. having said that, if the budget was around 30 to 40k for a system, then i would go down the mono block route, because large standmounts with big drivers need as much grip and control as you can get.
Thanks for covering Atoll. I have a SDA-300. Had a H190. What you described I observed as well for the most part. The Hegel had tighter bass. In my case the Atoll App and streamer work flawlessly. That BB dac is well thought out.
I have been considering trying a pre/power combo. I thought about getting a Zinamp tube preamp and a smaller stereo or mono power amp, but worry if matching is an issue. I would also love to try a passive pre, and the Zinamp provides that too. It really is a little gem if you ask me. Another interesting review, cheers Tarun.
Love the new look of the EVO. I am still in the separates camp but can certainly see the appeal of an integrated. Especially when the DAC and phono inputs are reasonably priced options. Great review Tarun!
Great review! For those interested, I choose for the new AM400 Signature + Topping Pre90. This is a little more flexible for the future, a little cheaper and the AM400 comes with even more capacitors and nice Claritycaps. Couldn´t be happier with the sound 😊
Fine review yet again. Interesting your request for Integrated Amps versus Pre Power Combo’s. Like you I have been an Exposure Integrated amp user for many years from the 80’onwards, several different models from a 15 to 3010S2D. All very nice amps (in my book). A few years back I got into Quad Pre/Power Artera combo. Maybe a more subtle sound? Must be me getting older! 70 plus. Not sure I could make the call between the two types of set ups. Latest system comprises of the Quad Artera Pre ( super flexibility) and PMC upgrade to my TwentyFive.23 speakers being 200 watt Class D ICE amps driving them in active mode each. I have had experience with class D via Marantz equipment but was amazed at the result when being used in the PMC speakers. I can make the call on these, staggeringly good (again only my opinion). Sound stage and dynamics are great, drive and bass control very good. Tonality good. Enough from me, that you again for a great channel, making you a Truly Fine Citizen ( to quote Moby Grape) Cheers Chap.
I have separates and I struggled a lot to get a proper preamplifier that preserved tone, timbre and dynamics. In separates, it is always the preamp that makes or breaks the system not the power amp. There are very many high quality power amps for real world prices but finding a really good preamp - that is a challenge. I currently run a Modwright LS100 into either a pair of Audio Space Nova M34 tube monoblocks or a Rogue Audio stereo 100 power amp based on my mood. They drive a pair of Tannoy Turnberry SE loudspeakers.
Yes, the pre makes the music!!! I always drive my tube amps with transistor basesd pre-amps. My advice to your combo: Holo Audio Serene KTE. /ruclips.net/video/lD2Fj1tTu8Y/видео.html Golden Sound from GB Greetings from Dortmund/ Germany
@@soumyajitdeb3943 I find it curious that you choose between two tubed power amps. Owning a Rogue Stereo 100 myself, I would be interested in what the Audio Space Nova offers that the Stereo 100 does not. Is it all down to the output tubes? The Stereo 100’s KT88/120/150 vs. the Space Nova’s EL34s?
Another great review! I think the preamplifier is the weak point of most integrated amplifiers so i prefer separate pre/power but i don't have the space or the desire to go as far as monoblocks.
Excellent review! Would love to get a chance to hear one of these but not widely sold in the USA. You say the warmth of the tone does not sacrifice resolution but what about transparency?
Very cool to see the flagship atoll integrated, Hegel gets some competition. Having said that, reckon something like exposure 5010 pre/power would be the way to go or even audiolab 9000 pre/power.
May i ask which version do you have? I am looking for the 9's and the 9.1's on the used market lately. An Atoll would fit perfectly in my my price range (and i love the design).
Thanks for the review Tarun, I recently purchased a new integrated (Exposure 3510). I could have gone down the pre-power route but I have enough box’s fighting for space and plug sockets. The Exposure will allow me to use it as a pre or a power amplifier should I want to gradually upgrade to separates in the future but I cannot see that happening, the integrated is more than I need.
Great review as always. I love how throroughly you go through the constructuon and quality of components. Regarding the integrated vs separates debate. I bought a Musical Fidelity KW500 hybrid integrated for a good price in 2015. Its a monster. A huge outboard power supply and main chassis that produces 510w. A combined weight of almost 100lbs for the two peices. Way more amp than I needed at the time. But it has paired well with every speaker upgrade i've thrown at it from Monitor Audio, Spendor, and now Revival Audio. I am tempted to move to separates to see if there is anything I'm missing, but i just dont know if a $7000 MSRP integrated in 2004 (over $10,0000 today thanks to inflation) can be bested by separates in the same price range. Dealers around me in California dont allow a trial period. What do you think?
I am sitting on two Hypex Nilai Monoblocks that will drive anything (500w into 4ohm and also into 2ohm). Using a Class A pre-amp, now still an Aune S17 pro, but a Chinese Accuphase inspired pre-amp is burning in right now. I like to be able to switch pre-amps. So an integrated would do (of course if it has a pre in, that can be circumvented).
I have often been able to compare Atoll amplifiers and CD players with Exposure. Atoll is quite good, but I clearly prefer Exposure. Exposure simply has more PRAT.
Are you going to check any of the fell audio products out ! I'm going to get one of the amplifiers I listen to it in a shop spectacular 500£ I don't think it will last for that price for much longer. No Chinese components all built in the UK can't ask for better. I would advise you to check one out great digital Stage and great phono stage
I Owned the old version of f the in 400 se….that realy was better than the Accuphase e 600. My friend owned that and we compared them a lot… the atoll was alway better in every way. The speakers were avant-garde acoustic horns… real hi end…. So the atoll is a geme…..
If integrated and is good enough,then why wouldn't one go this route.Less units/cabling/plugs is always a good thing,as long as quality is there with the sounds,that's all that should matter!
It looked great, but it was out of my budget. I'd hate to see your impression of some of the gaming pc builds on RUclips if you think that lighting was tacky.
Integrated amp vs separate pre and power amps. Advantages Integrated: engineering of internal pre/power interaction optimized by designer, fewer (expensive) power cables, fewer (expensive) interconnect cables, less heat generation, less shelf-space taken. Advantages separates: possible incremental improvement in performance-but against today's integrated offerings...well... you'll be able to claim you spent more (to anyone who'll listen).
...And, in my experience, well-engineered powered or active speakers driven by a well-engineered streaming source trump all of the above considerations.
I reviewed gear for Stereophile for 32 years (as Sam Tellig). Atoll is my favorite electronics manufacturer.
Hello Sam. Always loved your work
I have done so for 33 years.
A class defining review from the world's greatest audio reviewer.
A solid brand that has been around a long time. Always wanted to try their gear. So many great brands so little time!
@@willbrink thx Will 😊
I have now 3 Atoll amps (some modified to an even higher level), this brand is the base in my setups and customer service is very responsive 👍🏻
So save time and buy Atoll. Even their most affordable gear has that sumptuous sonic signature.
Good to see yet another manufacturer offering disc and dac stages as an option and also reasonably priced . As for your question I have gone down the route of a separate preamplifier and two bridges mono power amplifiers believing that it will achieve the best sound quality,including a preamplifier which has an internally balanced architecture. The arrangement gives detail and space with a balanced sound quality overall. I have not looked at an integrated for a long time but you never know I might be surprised.
Funny how just a single purchase can change our purchase criteria completely! I only ever looked at integrated amps up to 12 months ago but now I have a pre-amp I love I'm only really looking at power amps!! The IN400 would have definitely been on my radar after this review even if at the very top of my budget!! Great review Tarun thank you.
Recently got my hands on an entry levels accuphase preamp and am totally blown away! Outstanding performance, the tone controls also give you so much more flexibility which makes the hobby imo more interesting and satisfying.
I am an Atoll fan so I'm especially happy to see the in400 get top marks!
I have an Atoll cd transport and the in80 (thanks in part to this very channel) and I just love them to bits. If and when I break out of the tiny studio apartment I live in now, I would not hesitate for one moment to trial their higher end models first and foremost. As you say, they offer exceptional quality at very reasonable prices - nevermind the extra edge that they are still made in France.
And to your question of the day, in fact I ended up with the IN80 after a frustrating search for a "good" preamp to match with a hypex power amp. For the love of pete, the available preamps were more expensive than the amp itself and of course there was the added rabbit hole of evaling "synergy" etc - I got so disgusted I decided to simplify things so I trialed an open box IN50. It was a little bit too thick and forward in the midrange for my taste (I also suspected that unit may have been...ridden hard, shall we say?) I exchanged that for a spanking new IN80 and found a *very* happy place.
If and when I am in the market again I think I will keep things simple and go for an integrated. Not only is it easier (for me) to eval the sound qualities with just one unit, it also takes up less space, and I prefer that.
Because of your excellent reviews Atoll remains on my radar as a worthwhile purchase. Thank you for your time, efforts, and sharing this manufacturer with us all. Stay well, Sir.
Great review, Tarun. It’s a fascinating amplifier. I have been curious about Atoll ever since you reviewed the IN300.
I have always liked the idea of separate pre and power amplifiers. It is just that they don’t get reviewed very often and retailers here generally don’t have more than a few separates to audition.
Great review as always ! This evo series gonna be amazing in sound quality in the atoll amp range. This is my dream amp
I often enjoy your Atoll Reviews....If I were to buy an integrated amp this would be at top of my list...OOH La La! I'll have mine in silver, please. Being a crass American I LOVE the "tacky" knob backlights and and the elegant design, but prefer the the shape and styling of the chassis on The Evo's predecessor! Love the beauty of the innards too, Tarun! I am an American-separates kind of guy: Turbocharged Schiit Freya + pre-amp (I replaced the cheap capacitors & resistors with $800 worth of audiophile replacements in the tube circuit), driving my McIntosh MC152 Power Amp. Full-bodied, powerful and tight...just like this Atoll!!!
“Full bodied, powerful and tight”, just how I like my women!
Another great review!! Thanks!!
Thanks Tarun. My experience with Atoll was very positive. I like things voiced this way. Keep up the good work. I am a tinkerer so I love having separates, I can tube roll my preamp and juggle interconnects between pre and amps. Just fine tune to my hearts discontent.
Thanks for the review. Again an integrated amp that’s new to me. To answer your question, I prefer separate amps and preamps after many years with many different integrated components. I find that the focus on just inputs and control and just clean clear power gives the edge to separates. Plus I love the looks of separate matching pieces. I loved it when I was a kid and couldn’t afford it so I’m living the dream now. Have a great weekend!
Amazing review and amazing amp!! ❤
You became one of my favourite reviewers, great job once again. Eversolo dmp-a6 gen2 soon?
1. For desktop applications I am more inclined towards simplicity. So two possible solutions come to mind:
Active speakers with everything built in (KEF LS50 wirelss) or passive speakers with "super" integrated amplifier (streamer, DAC and integrated amp in one): e.g. lidenmann Move Mini speakers with Musicbook Combo integrated amp). For both of these solutions you need ethernet cable (if WIFI is not included) and power cable. That is it. No clutter.
2. For standard listening application I see two possible solution to my taste. Quite opposite to each other. Both solutions include a power amplifier (mono or not; does not matter if quality is there). First solution needs a streamer, DAC as it is an analog valve/tube preamplifier for its otherwise unreproducible tube sound (e.g. PS Audio BHK preamplifier).
The second is a "digital" preamplifier with streamer, DAC, HDMI Arc input, DIRAC, independent sub outs etc... (e.g. NAD M66).
That is my take on integrated vs. separates. ;-)
Much impressed by the layout, looks to be an awesome amplifier.
Regarding pre+power vs. integrated, I’ve always preferred separates, but I have to admit that the built-in synergy of an integrated finds me questioning my preference. Then there is the issue of interconnecting cables, and the sheer bulk of a two-box solution, which can easily morph into a three-box solution if your preamp puts its power supply in a separate enclosure. I really like the fact that the IN400 doesn’t force you accept a DAC or phono stage, I also like the fact that a 1/4” Jack is provided for a headphone is provided: every integrated should have one. Another issue is a balance control, power amps generally do not have them, and not all preamps have them (Schiit Freya+), most all integrated amplifiers offer this feature. When you need it, you really need it.
I recently purchased a Schiit Ragnarok 2. Yeah, it sounds much to my liking but I'd like to
improve my system with a bit more power. Enter the new Schiit Wotan class A/B power
amp that reportedly runs Class A up to 30W. Evidently the Forkbeard app indicates Class A
usage. Fortunately the Ragnarok has pre-out via XLR which would make for a perfect
link to the Wotan's XLR. Further: There's a chap here in Canada that designs tube buffers.
(Space-Tech Labs) Fortunately he lives close by and I have visited him a few times. It would
be fun to place one of his buffers between the Rag and the Wotan and see if the sound opens
up to the degree to make an investment worthwhile. There ya have it Tarun... you asked where
some of us are at integrated amp-wise. I love this hobby!!! One of my audio buddies once
called me a bliss-pig. I Am.
another great review as always. i like to think of myself as someone who looks to the future. i am not stuck in my ways and welcome all the advancements in 2 channel technology. i was speaking to an electrical engineer the other day, who was fixing a part for me and it became obvious that he was not interested in new technology, (he was pretty old) as i tried to convince him that class d and switch mode power supplies had come along way. class a and a/b are not the obvious choice these days and one doesn't need a huge toroidal transformer to get great sound anymore. just ask the scandinavians. so i would imagine that the same applies to mono blocks v integrated. having said that, if the budget was around 30 to 40k for a system, then i would go down the mono block route, because large standmounts with big drivers need as much grip and control as you can get.
Hi praise indeed and well presented again Tarun
Thanks for covering Atoll. I have a SDA-300. Had a H190. What you described I observed as well for the most part. The Hegel had tighter bass. In my case the Atoll App and streamer work flawlessly. That BB dac is well thought out.
I have been considering trying a pre/power combo. I thought about getting a Zinamp tube preamp and a smaller stereo or mono power amp, but worry if matching is an issue. I would also love to try a passive pre, and the Zinamp provides that too. It really is a little gem if you ask me. Another interesting review, cheers Tarun.
Love the new look of the EVO. I am still in the separates camp but can certainly see the appeal of an integrated. Especially when the DAC and phono inputs are reasonably priced options. Great review Tarun!
@@bryanherr1093 thank you Bryan 😊
Great review! For those interested, I choose for the new AM400 Signature + Topping Pre90. This is a little more flexible for the future, a little cheaper and the AM400 comes with even more capacitors and nice Claritycaps. Couldn´t be happier with the sound 😊
@@justasimplefox great. Thx for sharing 😊
Fine review yet again. Interesting your request for Integrated Amps versus Pre Power Combo’s. Like you I have been an Exposure Integrated amp user for many years from the 80’onwards, several different models from a 15 to 3010S2D. All very nice amps (in my book). A few years back I got into Quad Pre/Power Artera combo. Maybe a more subtle sound? Must be me getting older! 70 plus. Not sure I could make the call between the two types of set ups. Latest system comprises of the Quad Artera Pre ( super flexibility) and PMC upgrade to my TwentyFive.23 speakers being 200 watt Class D ICE amps driving them in active mode each. I have had experience with class D via Marantz equipment but was amazed at the result when being used in the PMC speakers. I can make the call on these, staggeringly good (again only my opinion). Sound stage and dynamics are great, drive and bass control very good. Tonality good. Enough from me, that you again for a great channel, making you a Truly Fine Citizen ( to quote Moby Grape) Cheers Chap.
Great review sir. I have the IN300 and love it.
I have separates and I struggled a lot to get a proper preamplifier that preserved tone, timbre and dynamics. In separates, it is always the preamp that makes or breaks the system not the power amp. There are very many high quality power amps for real world prices but finding a really good preamp - that is a challenge.
I currently run a Modwright LS100 into either a pair of Audio Space Nova M34 tube monoblocks or a Rogue Audio stereo 100 power amp based on my mood. They drive a pair of Tannoy Turnberry SE loudspeakers.
Yes, the pre makes the music!!! I always drive my tube amps with transistor basesd pre-amps. My advice to your combo: Holo Audio Serene KTE. /ruclips.net/video/lD2Fj1tTu8Y/видео.html Golden Sound from GB Greetings from Dortmund/ Germany
@@soumyajitdeb3943 I find it curious that you choose between two tubed power amps. Owning a Rogue Stereo 100 myself, I would be interested in what the Audio Space Nova offers that the Stereo 100 does not. Is it all down to the output tubes? The Stereo 100’s KT88/120/150 vs. the Space Nova’s EL34s?
@@soumyajitdeb3943 I agree. Great preamps are trickier to find 😊
Another great review! I think the preamplifier is the weak point of most integrated amplifiers so i prefer separate pre/power but i don't have the space or the desire to go as far as monoblocks.
Beautiful amp!
Good to hear about Atoll improvements.
It's time for new PMC Prophecy.
Excellent review! Would love to get a chance to hear one of these but not widely sold in the USA. You say the warmth of the tone does not sacrifice resolution but what about transparency?
Great review as always thx
@@christiantessier1661 thank you 😊
🤗 hope all is well Taryn💚💚💚
Very cool to see the flagship atoll integrated, Hegel gets some competition. Having said that, reckon something like exposure 5010 pre/power would be the way to go or even audiolab 9000 pre/power.
Top review ❤
Great review as always! I drive my Canton reference 9 stand mounts with an atoll AM100, a great combination indeed 🎉
May i ask which version do you have? I am looking for the 9's and the 9.1's on the used market lately.
An Atoll would fit perfectly in my my price range (and i love the design).
Thanks for the review Tarun,
I recently purchased a new integrated (Exposure 3510). I could have gone down the pre-power route but I have enough box’s fighting for space and plug sockets. The Exposure will allow me to use it as a pre or a power amplifier should I want to gradually upgrade to separates in the future but I cannot see that happening, the integrated is more than I need.
Would be interesting to know if it is the pre or power amp section that gives the good sound, maybe you will review a power amp from them 😜
Great review as always. I love how throroughly you go through the constructuon and quality of components.
Regarding the integrated vs separates debate. I bought a Musical Fidelity KW500 hybrid integrated for a good price in 2015. Its a monster. A huge outboard power supply and main chassis that produces 510w. A combined weight of almost 100lbs for the two peices. Way more amp than I needed at the time. But it has paired well with every speaker upgrade i've thrown at it from Monitor Audio, Spendor, and now Revival Audio.
I am tempted to move to separates to see if there is anything I'm missing, but i just dont know if a $7000 MSRP integrated in 2004 (over $10,0000 today thanks to inflation) can be bested by separates in the same price range. Dealers around me in California dont allow a trial period. What do you think?
I am sitting on two Hypex Nilai Monoblocks that will drive anything (500w into 4ohm and also into 2ohm). Using a Class A pre-amp, now still an Aune S17 pro, but a Chinese Accuphase inspired pre-amp is burning in right now. I like to be able to switch pre-amps. So an integrated would do (of course if it has a pre in, that can be circumvented).
@@D1N02 thank you for sharing 😊
I have often been able to compare Atoll amplifiers and CD players with Exposure. Atoll is quite good, but I clearly prefer Exposure. Exposure simply has more PRAT.
Are you going to check any of the fell audio products out ! I'm going to get one of the amplifiers I listen to it in a shop spectacular 500£ I don't think it will last for that price for much longer. No Chinese components all built in the UK can't ask for better. I would advise you to check one out great digital Stage and great phono stage
@jedi-mic on my radar 😊
they missed a trick by not putting the headphone socket centrally in the "O" in the logo.
I Owned the old version of f the in 400 se….that realy was better than the Accuphase e 600. My friend owned that and we compared them a lot… the atoll was alway better in every way. The speakers were avant-garde acoustic horns… real hi end…. So the atoll is a geme…..
If integrated and is good enough,then why wouldn't one go this route.Less units/cabling/plugs is always a good thing,as long as quality is there with the sounds,that's all that should matter!
Lego!
It looked great, but it was out of my budget. I'd hate to see your impression of some of the gaming pc builds on RUclips if you think that lighting was tacky.
@@patricaomas8750 thx for watching 😊
Atoll makes a lot of more affordable gear. I listen to the little AM100 power amp and love it!
Integrated amp vs separate pre and power amps. Advantages Integrated: engineering of internal pre/power interaction optimized by designer, fewer (expensive) power cables, fewer (expensive) interconnect cables, less heat generation, less shelf-space taken. Advantages separates: possible incremental improvement in performance-but against today's integrated offerings...well... you'll be able to claim you spent more (to anyone who'll listen).
...And, in my experience, well-engineered powered or active speakers driven by a well-engineered streaming source trump all of the above considerations.
Integrated amp for £5000+ does not compute...tilt.