I have 90 HEALTH and endless healing...
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 авг 2024
- I was so excited to try out the new Signature Treasure card Crimson, and it didn't disappoint in this awesome Triple Blood Scarlet Duels run!
#DuelsRun #MarchOfTheLichKing #RegisKillbin
--
Hearthstone | Duels | I have 90 HEALTH and endless healing...
Regis Titles: YOU CANT WIN. I AM TOO POWERFUL. I WILL DESTROY YOU. YOU ARE A FEEBLE SHEEP AND SHALL BE DESTROYED.
Regis talking about the game: Whew, that was a close one guys. I can't believe this run is going so well. I guess we'll pick this bucket but I don't know guys. We just keep on getting these bad buckets.
I am so happy that you are back to playing Duels runs, now that the new expansion hoopla is over
“The tiny muncher army steals the victory!” Is one of my new favourite Regis quotes 😂
honestly Regis had great play that entire game. That deck the opponent had looks like absolute shit to play against and I'm glad he won.
45:40 is the most soul-destroying moment I've ever seen
Certified Regis Chicanery
The kill at 1:18:40 was amazing
It is unfair to use hindsight to judge prior decisions in Hearthstone. But given hindsight, I think he would've been better off burning the vampiric blood because it would've given him the draw to clear the high damage minion that same turn, saving more life in the long run. That being said, he still made the right play. The odds of that secret being counterspell weren't great, and the upside of playing Looming Presence far outweighed the other line of testing with vampiric. Hindsight is 20/20 and sometimes chat is just wrong.
15:50 that had me dead…all your mana spent on tentacles instead of patchwork.
This video was a real rollercoaster of emotions. I loved it!
Ayyy! Love duels content, it's what brought me back to Hearthstone. Was just playing some a while ago.
I honestly just concede against Reno in duels. It is not fun to play around so many secrets over and over again. Secrets are a fun mechanic when used sparingly, but when every single action you take is at risk, it isn't really playing around it at that point. It is hoping you have something to minimize risk and test. Over and over.
They should have taken a page out of Magic's book and just had Objection return the minion to hand without proccing Battlecry. It would still be a great secret if it did that, and it wouldn't make people cry half as much the sixth time in one game it came down
1:45:30 Devastating, but man way to play it out to the very end!
Fair to say it's inconclusive whether either action was correct during the Counterspell turn. Foregoing the Blood boil for 2 extra cards and a bit of armor may have drawn you into the Soulstealer/other useful cards sooner or could have given you nothing useful BUT it can also be argued you were going to draw into Soulstealer next turn with your chosen path & won had your opponent not discovered that treasure right at that moment. A better argument may have been towards not playing Corpse Bride if we wanted to be cautious of the crab but the risk was necessary to hopefully delay them long enough for a chance to win. It was a cool game & awesome to see that Blood Boil interaction either way!
Glad to see another quick duels run... keep up the great work Regis!
Have you ever had a dream, that 2:15:17
Remember when Gary Kasparov said, of his own volition and totally not while being paid for it - that Hearthstone was as high level tactical as chess?
Regis - "The plan is, go face alot"
Best quote: "The tiny muncher army!"
Yeah, the fact that deckbuilding is hm, should I include one deathrattle or will that screw me with buckets is not a good system
Happy to see duels content. I wound up quitting hearthstone at the start of the last expansion but your content, duels especially, is my one link to the game.
Loved watching this! I've been wondering how good the 1/1 minion treasure would be, and now I see he can be very nice with blood dk
Blur is broken in the tavern brawl where you use health for spells.
2:11:31 not hitting face here cost him the win
That blood to ichor discussion, around 32:25 , Regis has a point.
It's similar to how SC2 commentators have agreed that "lair" only has one pronunciation and has explicitly stated that every other dialect is wrong. They pronounce it like "layer", but there are other ways to say it. L-air is a very popular one.
That gnomish army knife was heart breaking
27:10 suddenly, Blackwater Behemoth
Soulstealer is red mixed with blue. Purple has red
That game against the frost dk was bonkers!
Hey Regis , Iam a big fan of yours. I´ve been watching you since ungoro expansion and always liked they way you play hearthstone. Here´s the thing recently I found a really interesting deck with new Arcane bolt mechanic. Could you use a deck like this ??? Or maybe my decklist :) keep doing great videos 🥳🥳🥳
Hello Regis.
do you have a place where you post your standard deck codes?
and have you thought about doing a video where you try to give some insight on why you chose what cards you do in duels.
i'd love to play it a bit more but feel like i can't figure out what cards would be needed and why when building a deck
I got a 12 win run yesterday using the discard lock and I got shadowcrafting. Infinite killmox was ridiculous.
The other death knight has a ridiculous hero power that summons a ghoul with reborn(it is so much stronger than it sounds)
15:30 I’m pretty sure you can still do it all full health unless it said “Whenever you restore health to your hero, gain that much attack and health”
We saw in this video that it doesn't work that way. Healing requires ability to heal. We've known that since the Uldum quests.
I was just watching the stream recording of this, when i saw the video 😅
Hi @RegisKillbin
I was just wondering if you had any plans on making a Mine Warlock video. I have been having fun with the deck, and I feel like it is quite solid - I have a 66% winrate from an OK sample size.
What a great run
Love watching duels but hate playing it with a passion
Watching that Reno match, is honesty why I don’t play HS anymore, I was tilting for you, watching you make good decisions only for the opponent to be stupidly annoying and lucky
Still think he should have sent the bird face when it was a 19/13 It would have sent the guy into a defence mode and he would have pulled home the win
Duels for the win
Could it be that only death k ughr is viable later on since they do not get bad buckets?
Regis maybe try to get Heavy Armor with Blood Deathknight. It is not balanced like with the Priest max health increase. I had 35 health, was taking only 1 damage at a time and nearly endless healing. So hopefully they will fix this issue after you streamed it. 😂
Not sure if it is lucky or something, but I feel like every asphyxiate I play/see hits the highest health minion in the case of a tie for high attack. Anyone know if this is the case?
i wouldnt be surpised tbh, death knight cards seem really jankily coded
Obligatory comment for good Tuber.
3:04
Reno +this card
Seeing people games being destroyed with scroll of wonder is my new fetish.
cool now i know i was mispronouncing ichor
Give me a reason not to watch the same video on the Streambin channel
Can't use bloody magic in the art otherwise this game would be banned in China my guy.
Theorizing and then have your theory confirmed isn’t “using hindsight” as hindsight is looking back at the situation and using the knowledge you didn’t have when you made the decision. If what the chat did was “using hindsight” then Regis is also “using hindsight” to justify using looming presence because there wouldn’t have been that blood boil on mida. Which is arguably using hindsight more than the people that were theorizing.
It’s odd to say that hearthstone players suffer from using hindsight while also using hindsight to justify the plays you made.
Stop arguing with twitch chat on screen it's boring and obnoxious.
If someone says, "You should play around x outcome," you don't listen, and you lose... then they aren't Captain Hindsight, they are completely justified in saying, "I told you so." (Not for the others, yes, they have no right.)
You were really insistent that you were right and they were wrong, for a guy who lost that game. You were even using hindsight to justify your position while chastizing those who used foresight to warn you.
All told, you are the streamer and you must make the calls, but when you're wrong (demonstrated clearly by the outcome), you should have enough confidence to own that the call was wrong, even if you would have made it again in similar circumstances.
I believe you missed the point Regis was trying to make. Even if testing for the secret would've resulted in a win (which I'm not convinced it would have), Regis was still correct to play to his outs. I think there's some confusion about what "correct decision" means (is that "the line that appeared to have the best chance of winning at the time" or "the line that would've actually won in retrospect"?), but it's not an "I Told You So" situation either way.
The best decision at the time was to take the line that had the most outs. His choice at that stage in the game amounted to "play risky and either eke out a win or lose big" or "play safe and definitely lose." That the risk ended up being "punished" is irrelevant if taking the risk was his only shot at that point, given how far behind he was. "Play it safe so you can lose in a less painful way" is not good advice, and doesn't earn the giver an "I Told You So."
Without hindsight, Regis played to his outs, which was the correct decision to make.
With hindsight, Regis was almost certainly doomed even if he had chosen to sacrifice the Blood Boil to push Looming Presence through. (As far as I can tell. I'm not going to try to simulate the exact sequence of plays that would've occurred had Regis gone with that line.)
Save your I Told You So for when it's an insightful prediction (e.g. "You can tell it's a Counterspell because the opponent was comfortable committing a lot to the board, signaling that they trusted their secret to stop a board wipe") or at least when the unchosen line would've been a win.
@@temtempo13 Right, but saying, "I must take this risky line that could become a win because the safe line results in a slow loss," is valid only when you're correct in that assessment.
Playing the odds is right, and yet someone wins the lottery megabucks every so often. Feel free to argue get their choice to play against the odds was wrong while they laugh at you all the way to the bank.
Sometimes, the "technically" correct move is still the actually wrong one.
If you stop with these runs, I will just die. 😭💀🦹🦸