People seem to forget that nobody has the right to demand an inheritance. Outside of minimal legal obligations, the grandparents may gift their estate as they wish.
Until it happens to you don't tell people how to leave their money. No it's not the childs fault but the parents. So they put the child in that situation. Husband should have gotten a divorce first. Mistress knew he was married.
A kid isn't a catch-all for relatives' money. The kid isn't being "punished." he just isn't being offered the same things due to his parents' choices. Your relatives dont have to like you, support you, pay for you, give your kids money when you die, or leave all their stuff to you because you fell from the same DNA tree. You wanted a supportive family for your kid? Guess you should have been supportive to your FAMILY first.
You don't inherit debt, so there's no debt to settle. Lenders may trust their best to demand their money back, but you're not legally required to give them shit.
@@middletech hypothetically speaking: I'm certain that the mistress would stay out of the way and run for the hills. Why would she pay for anything when they don't have to?
It's the old woman's money. She doesn't want to have a relationship with her son or his son. 😅 She has a right to choose who she wants to give her money to. She chose her former daughter-in-law and her son. It doesn't mean she hates the other child. She just doesn't want anything to do with her son and his new family. It's the parent's job to provide for their son. Not the grandparents. The old woman did it for her son till he gave her a reason to want nothing to do with him and his family. Now she CHOSE a new family to leave her hard earned and well looked after money and things to. 😅 The same goes for me. If I do something to cause my parents to cut me out of their lives, I don't expect them to want to leave things for my child. It's my job to do that. I don't have the right to tell them what to do with their money 😂🤣💀💀 They'll leave things to those they know and love or think deserve what they worked hard for. It's their right. 😅 There is a consequence to every action. Sonny boii effed around and found out 🤷🏿♀️
I don't care who inherent. But the true victims are the children. In particular. The love child. That child did nothing for such hate. Sad, the Emilee thinks this is okay.
@kellymorgan4372 It is absolutely hate. If it were indifference, she would not have highlighted all the ways she had ensured the child suffered. People cheat. The children are the loosers. She gloats that the child will have no grandparent love. Who does that, but a bitter woman. Get over it. Life is better because they aren't together. The child did nothing wrong. He is the true victim in the entire story. As for the grandmother, she is just as bad. Disown your son and his tramp. But the grandchild did nothing to deserve the treatment inflicted upon him. The husband was wrong. The tramp was wrong. The grandmother is wrong for ostracizing her grandchild. The x is wrong for being vindictive to the child. Evil and ugliness all around. None have a moral code. Both children suffer. Grow up, get along. The x is still stewing in her betraya. She is very far from indifferent. X needs to let it go. Grandma, your son sucks. But don't throw your grandchild away like trash. He isn't. All need to do better. What grandma is doing is just as vile as the affair. X's minupulation and glee at the child's losses shows she is just as vile.
@@patriciagalvin4568 you can't disown your son and go no contact but still see the kid. All grandma did was stand by the injured parties, disown her cheating son, decide not to have a relationship with his other kid (which would cause indifference toward that kid since there's no emotional connection), and choose to leave HER MONEY to the grandchild she actually does know and loves. I have plenty of relatives that I've never met in my life. I don't love them, don't hate them, don't feel anything for them at all. They're strangers, which is exactly what the love child was to her, a complete stranger
It's up to the grandma who she leaves her assests to,but shunning her other grandchild because of the was born is wrong. He's innocent she should take her anger and disappointment out on the parents
My grandma told me that it’s a shame that grandma is punishing the child it’s not it’s fault because of the parents she said people have affair babies more likely to be punished for being born
So it's okay to leave everything to the cheater and op and her son will probably get nothing when the cheater passes? How's that fair? No one is owed anything after someone passes. Also considering the affair baby gets two parents full time, their money and support, it actually is fair that op's kid gets all grandma's stuff because he doesn't get to grow up in a home with two parents care and finances. But apparently that doesn't matter to you either.
Maybe the MIL should put something aside for the son second child. The child had nothing to do with the situation and if it's her son's child he deserves as much as the OP's child. Making a child pay for a bad parent isn't a decision is a wise adult.
@@meowson4rlthe baby is deprived by not having his grandparents. Regardless of the affair the child did nothing wrong to not be recognized as family. It truly shows their character.
No one is depriving the childs life. That child botha mother and a father. He will do just fine. Money does not equal right,and inheritance is always guaranteed. That child is not the grandmothers responsibility nore ex wifes responsibility. Meanwhile, OP will have to take care of her son all on her own her own, forced to be a single mother and her child not having a father. Motherinlaw is doing what she can, helping her grandson, who is abandoned by his father, making sure he will be ok when she is gone. i hope u get put in the same position. See how fast you change your tune. @BlackChambermaid
It's funny. In situations where the woman cheats, gets knocked up, and tries to pass the kid off as the husbands.....everyone just tells him to "man up" and sacrifice his resources to raise the other man's kid because "it's not the kid's fault". It's interesting to see how society holds men accountable for their poor choices while they let women off the hook.
I understand the whole concept but the child is a victim just like she is. Its not an it and maybe some day in the future her son would like to know his sibling.
Sounds like a classic "fuck around find out situation". Looks like sonny boy did the fucking around. Now hes about to find out.
If only unfaithful WOMEN and THEIR affair babies were treated equally.
Find out something more than the child from fu*king
Sounds like Mom is letting Sonny know how she feels about his affair.
People seem to forget that nobody has the right to demand an inheritance. Outside of minimal legal obligations, the grandparents may gift their estate as they wish.
I honestly hope that affair baby won't have an awful life because of the baby's parents mistakes.
Thats entirety upto your MIL its hers to leave as she wishes
Until it happens to you don't tell people how to leave their money. No it's not the childs fault but the parents. So they put the child in that situation. Husband should have gotten a divorce first. Mistress knew he was married.
A kid isn't a catch-all for relatives' money. The kid isn't being "punished." he just isn't being offered the same things due to his parents' choices. Your relatives dont have to like you, support you, pay for you, give your kids money when you die, or leave all their stuff to you because you fell from the same DNA tree. You wanted a supportive family for your kid? Guess you should have been supportive to your FAMILY first.
Well the husband should have a good insurance policy for the other child.
I feel bad for the affair child not the parents
If your husband died in debt would the mistress think she should help settle the debt.
You don't inherit debt, so there's no debt to settle. Lenders may trust their best to demand their money back, but you're not legally required to give them shit.
@@SailorYuki hypothetically
Just indulge me.
@@middletech hypothetically speaking: I'm certain that the mistress would stay out of the way and run for the hills. Why would she pay for anything when they don't have to?
@@SailorYuki aman!
It's the old woman's money. She doesn't want to have a relationship with her son or his son. 😅
She has a right to choose who she wants to give her money to. She chose her former daughter-in-law and her son.
It doesn't mean she hates the other child. She just doesn't want anything to do with her son and his new family.
It's the parent's job to provide for their son. Not the grandparents. The old woman did it for her son till he gave her a reason to want nothing to do with him and his family. Now she CHOSE a new family to leave her hard earned and well looked after money and things to. 😅
The same goes for me. If I do something to cause my parents to cut me out of their lives, I don't expect them to want to leave things for my child. It's my job to do that. I don't have the right to tell them what to do with their money 😂🤣💀💀
They'll leave things to those they know and love or think deserve what they worked hard for. It's their right. 😅
There is a consequence to every action. Sonny boii effed around and found out 🤷🏿♀️
I am sorry for the child, since it is innocent.
But its parents f**ked up
The heart perfect
I don't care who inherent. But the true victims are the children. In particular. The love child. That child did nothing for such hate. Sad, the Emilee thinks this is okay.
it's not hate, it's indifference.
@kellymorgan4372 It is absolutely hate. If it were indifference, she would not have highlighted all the ways she had ensured the child suffered. People cheat. The children are the loosers. She gloats that the child will have no grandparent love. Who does that, but a bitter woman. Get over it. Life is better because they aren't together. The child did nothing wrong. He is the true victim in the entire story. As for the grandmother, she is just as bad. Disown your son and his tramp. But the grandchild did nothing to deserve the treatment inflicted upon him. The husband was wrong. The tramp was wrong. The grandmother is wrong for ostracizing her grandchild. The x is wrong for being vindictive to the child. Evil and ugliness all around. None have a moral code. Both children suffer. Grow up, get along. The x is still stewing in her betraya. She is very far from indifferent. X needs to let it go. Grandma, your son sucks. But don't throw your grandchild away like trash. He isn't. All need to do better. What grandma is doing is just as vile as the affair. X's minupulation and glee at the child's losses shows she is just as vile.
@@patriciagalvin4568 you can't disown your son and go no contact but still see the kid. All grandma did was stand by the injured parties, disown her cheating son, decide not to have a relationship with his other kid (which would cause indifference toward that kid since there's no emotional connection), and choose to leave HER MONEY to the grandchild she actually does know and loves. I have plenty of relatives that I've never met in my life. I don't love them, don't hate them, don't feel anything for them at all. They're strangers, which is exactly what the love child was to her, a complete stranger
It's up to the grandma who she leaves her assests to,but shunning her other grandchild because of the was born is wrong. He's innocent she should take her anger and disappointment out on the parents
My grandma told me that it’s a shame that grandma is punishing the child it’s not it’s fault because of the parents she said people have affair babies more likely to be punished for being born
So it's okay to leave everything to the cheater and op and her son will probably get nothing when the cheater passes? How's that fair? No one is owed anything after someone passes. Also considering the affair baby gets two parents full time, their money and support, it actually is fair that op's kid gets all grandma's stuff because he doesn't get to grow up in a home with two parents care and finances. But apparently that doesn't matter to you either.
He'll get his father's money
How does she have a son? Didn't she miscarry?
She said she was pregnant with their 2nd child miscarried that baby
She said she has a five year son and had a miscarriage with the second baby
The child isn't responsible so the grandparents are wrong for shunning the baby.
Grandparents have a right to ignore who they want
Maybe the MIL should put something aside for the son second child. The child had nothing to do with the situation and if it's her son's child he deserves as much as the OP's child. Making a child pay for a bad parent isn't a decision is a wise adult.
And raising a child to think they are entitled to things offered to others simply because they are related, is also unwise.
I can completely understand the drama between all the adults, but the children regardless of who they belong to are innocent
Imagine being angry at a kid lol
Uhhhh, that kid is the parent’s responsibility-not the grandparent's. Also, turn around and face the consequences. Their money - their choice.
@@mignon902 of course it is. But I wouldn't be proud of depriving an innocent child's life. And we just have one side of the story.
@@BlackChambermaid how's the affair baby deprived? Unlike older son he still has dad around
@@meowson4rlthe baby is deprived by not having his grandparents. Regardless of the affair the child did nothing wrong to not be recognized as family. It truly shows their character.
No one is depriving the childs life. That child botha mother and a father. He will do just fine. Money does not equal right,and inheritance is always guaranteed. That child is not the grandmothers responsibility nore ex wifes responsibility. Meanwhile, OP will have to take care of her son all on her own her own, forced to be a single mother and her child not having a father. Motherinlaw is doing what she can, helping her grandson, who is abandoned by his father, making sure he will be ok when she is gone. i hope u get put in the same position. See how fast you change your tune. @BlackChambermaid
It's her money she can leave it to whoever she wants.
That patch was dog shit just saying
It's funny. In situations where the woman cheats, gets knocked up, and tries to pass the kid off as the husbands.....everyone just tells him to "man up" and sacrifice his resources to raise the other man's kid because "it's not the kid's fault".
It's interesting to see how society holds men accountable for their poor choices while they let women off the hook.
I understand the whole concept but the child is a victim just like she is. Its not an it and maybe some day in the future her son would like to know his sibling.
"that child contributed to my miscarriage" is crazy. Your freaking husband abandoned you, don't blame an innocent child.